U.S. Department of Homeland Security OEC/ICTAP CLASSIFIED Office of Emergency Communications / Interoperable Communications Technical Assistance Program [State] Incident Command System (ICS) Communications Unit Program Plan Outline A supplement to the Incident Command System Communications Unit Implementation and Best Practices guide Prepared by: [Name] DHS/OEC/ICTAP Day, Month, Year DHS/OEC/ICTAP ICS Communications Unit Program Plan Outline How to Use This Template This template supplements the ICS Communications Unit Implementation and Best Practices: A Guide for Program Development. Use it within your agency to create an Incident Command System (ICS) Communications Unit (COMU) Program Plan to support your ICS COMU Program. SEARCH used several sources to develop this model: The National Association of State 9-1-1 Administrators’ (NASNA) Model State 9-1-1 Plan.1 Responses to the survey of Statewide Interoperability Coordinators (SWICs) conducted by the Executive Council of the National Council of SWICs (NCSWIC) in 2010. Responses from states interviewed to develop the ICS Communications Unit Implementation and Best Practices guide. This ICS Communications Unit Program Plan Outline serves to guide SWICs and other personnel charged with overseeing public safety communications projects, and who are responsible for establishing a COMU Program, to incorporate COMU positions into planning and response. It is intended to provide assistance with the development of the COMU Program Plan and the associated document sections. Additional information related to each plan section presented in this document is available in the ICS Communications Unit Implementation and Best Practices guide. This template provides instructions on how to create an ICS COMU Program Plan—what to consider, who to engage, and what information to collect. You may need to modify the template to meet specific organizational needs. The basic sections and sub-sections of the COMU Program Plan include: Executive Summary (see pp. 4–5) — Background and Purpose — The Planning Process — Goals and Objectives Introduction (see pp. 5–6) — Overview: National History/Background of All-Hazards ICS COMU Positions — Overview: History/Background of All-Hazards COMU Positions in Your State — Conclusion Current ICS COMU Environment (see pp. 6–10) — Current Legislative and Regulatory Environment and Program Structure — Current ICS COMU Staff and Technology — Integration with PSAP/Dispatch Operations and Incident Communications Center — Economics — Mutual Aid Considerations and EMAC Future Environment (see p. 10) 1 Published July 2008. Available at https://www.911resourcecenter.org/code/ContentDetail.aspx?ContentID=333 DHS/OEC/ICTAP 2 ICS Communications Unit Program Plan Outline Goals, Objectives, and Measures (see pp. 10–11) — Developing a Vision, Goals, Objectives, and Performance Measures — Tracking Progress Resource Allocation (see pp. 11–12) Updating the Plan (see p. 12) Governance and Managing the ICS COMU Program (see pp. 12–13) — Implementation Plan Conclusion (see p. 13) References (see p. 13) Appendixes (see p. 13) — Glossary DHS/OEC/ICTAP 3 ICS Communications Unit Program Plan Outline Executive Summary The Executive Summary section is a condensed version of the full ICS COMU Program Plan. It summarizes the contents of the full document so the audience can quickly familiarize themselves with the material. Generally, it contains a statement of the problem or purpose of the document, highlights of any background information, provides an abridged analysis, and offers primary conclusions. An effective executive summary should give the audience a clear idea of the main points of the document without reading the entire document. A good executive summary can serve as an aid to decision-making by executive-level personnel. Executive summary key points: Since the intent is to summarize the content and highlight the mission-critical elements of the ICS COMU Program Plan that can affect decision-making, write the executive summary after you write the plan. Target the executive summary for the executive/senior-level management and the nontechnical managers and administrators.2 An executive summary of more than 3 pages will not be as effective as one that is less than a page or two. The executive summary is not the place for new information. The information in an executive summary must be located within the main sections of plan. Recommended components of the ICS COMU Program Plan executive summary are: Background and Purpose Planning Process Goals and Objectives — Background and Purpose Background and Purpose describes the following to your audience: why you are writing the ICS COMU Program Plan, what the purpose of the plan is, who the intended users are, and the expected outcomes. — The Planning Process Planning Process presents a condensed version of the planning process. Project management research clearly demonstrates the importance of following a project management methodology and includes a high level of stakeholder and user involvement. 3 User involvement is vital to project success and implementation of the ICS COMU Program Plan. Include these planning tools in your planning process: Decision-making Structure Risk Management Plan Project Charter Communications Plan 2 The NASA Model State 9-1-1 Plan is available for download at https://www.911resourcecenter.org/code/ContentDetail.aspx?ContentID=333 3 Law Enforcement Tech Guide: How to Plan Purchase, and Manage Technology, Successfully!, available at http://www.cops.usdoj.gov/files/ric/Publications/lawenforcementtechguide.pdf. Hereafter, LETG. DHS/OEC/ICTAP 4 ICS Communications Unit Program Plan Outline The information contained in these tools is part of the most vital planning tool—the Project Charter.4 By using a project management methodology, you are providing decision-makers with the confidence that the process is structured and based on user needs. Even though each state, region, or local jurisdiction’s experience with the planning process will differ in actual implementation and environmental factors such as politics and economics, there are areas of commonality. Although a Project Charter exists as a separate document from the ICS COMU Program Plan, this “Planning Process” section should contain summary statements about the information in these three planning tools (Decision-making Structure, Risk Management Plan, Communications Plan). — Goals and Objectives This component of the executive summary is straightforward. It briefly outlines key Goals and Objectives of the ICS COMU Program. Just like the planning process, there will be differences between each state, region, or local jurisdiction—but there should be continuity of goals and objectives within the state itself. Categories to formulate program goals and objectives on include: ICS COMU services and capabilities Equipment and technology (capital improvements) to be acquired Funding and sustainability requirements Legislative requirements Operational support Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) Staffing needs Training and recognition requirements State ICS COMU program administration Recordkeeping and documentation needs Deployment and mutual aid Methods for bringing the ICS COMU into a formalized existence during planning and response, via documentation and a process that recognizes what they are and what they do, and how they operate so they become an asset to the state. Introduction The Introduction section should be brief and provide information on the state’s ICS COMU Program Plan. The introduction provides the opportunity to explain why the plan was developed and what the purpose of the plan is. — Overview: National History and Background of All-Hazards ICS Communications Unit Positions This subsection provides a national perspective of the ICS COMU and its position as a component of the ICS from its inception to its current state. Do not expect this section to include every detail of the evolution of the ICS COMU. Rather, it should present the audience with information needed to see the benefits and contributions the ICS COMU 4 This document is the foundation of any project and contains a project description (scope, objectives, risks, organization/staffing, decision-making structure, the project management approach, and initial resource requirements). DHS/OEC/ICTAP 5 ICS Communications Unit Program Plan Outline brings to the table. This section should highlight required actions to ensure that future incidents include recognized ICS COMU personnel. — Overview: History and Background of All-Hazards COMU Positions in Your State This subsection brings the history of the ICS COMU and its position closer to home and provides an overview of the development of the ICS COMU within your state. This means that it will be unique to each state. — Conclusion The conclusion of the Introduction should emphasize that work exists into the future. Include a brief description of how this plan fits within the national and state positions. Current ICS Communications Unit Environment The Current Environment section focuses on the specifics of the state’s ICS COMU Plan, including a description of the state’s coordination function, staffing, funding mechanism, authority, etc. Include factors that potentially influence ICS COMU development throughout the state. Examples include states that do not have recognized Communications Unit Leader (COML) Instructors, challenges getting Position Task Books (PTBs) completed, responding to results of after action reports, funding reductions, etc. — Current Legislative and Regulatory Environment and Program Structure This subsection is straightforward and should include statutory provisions for ICS COMU Program development, including governance, training, and funding. Include a description of the nature and scope of authority of state, regional, and local-level ICS COMU programs. Include specific references to existing statutes or other state codes. Information relating to an ICS COMU coordinating function, if one exists, should include: How it is organized or positioned within local, regional, and/or state government, including references to any legislative, statutory, or other regulatory codes. The roles, responsibilities, and scope of authority. Identification of staff. Relationships to other agencies that may have a role in ICS COMU Program coordination, such as the State Training Office, Office of Emergency Communications (OEC), Telecommunicator Emergency Response Team (TERT), etc. Interactions or relationships with local or regional ICS COMU authorities. Methods for funding local, regional, or state ICS COMU Programs, such as COML training and COML exercise Technical Assistance offered by OEC and COML training offered through the Emergency Management Institute (EMI). Current methods for documenting and tracking both trained and deployable personnel. DHS/OEC/ICTAP 6 ICS Communications Unit Program Plan Outline Methods used to engage users and obtain feedback, such as from National Council of Statewide Interoperability Coordinators (NCSWIC) involvement. Identify pending legislation that may affect the ICS COMU Program. A regular review of current governing rules and legislation should identify if any changes are necessary to achieve ICS COMU Program goals and objectives. — Current ICS Communications Unit Staff and Technology This subsection should include an assessment of the current ICS COMU staffing and technology for the state, region, or jurisdiction. It should include the number of recognized personnel and command vehicles, availability for deployment, and general capabilities. The technology element may already be contained in a Tactical Interoperable Communications Plan (TICP) or Statewide Communications Interoperability Plan (SCIP). If not, conduct an inventory of technology along with ICS COMU staffing resources. For example, staffing and assessment for any ICS COMU position—Communications Unit Leader (COML), Communications Unit Technician (COMT), Incident Communications Center Manager (INCM), Radio Operator (RADO), Technical Specialist (THSP), Message Runner (MsgR), and Communications Coordinator (COMC)—could include the following elements: Identify and provide contact information for members of the governance structure, including subcommittees and working groups. List state, regional, and local agency websites and databases that contain ICS COMU information. Identify practices, processes, and procedures that exist at the state, regional, and local level. Identify how many individuals have received training, including the training source. Identify how many individuals have completed their Position Task Books (PTBs). Identify how many individuals that the Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ) recognizes and has available for deployment, including agency, location, and contact information. Identify how many individuals the AHJ recognizes as instructors for ICS Communication position-specific training. List anticipated annual training and exercise requirements. Baseline data should be available through each of the SWICs. It is important to know where your program is and where you want to go so you can plan how to get there. If you do not know where you are, you cannot determine what you need. A baseline assessment determines your starting point. The relationship between baseline information and future assessments determines your progress, where your gaps are, and how far you need to go to achieve your ICS COMU Program goals. DHS/OEC/ICTAP 7 ICS Communications Unit Program Plan Outline — Integration with Public Safety Answering Point (PSAP)/Dispatch Operations and Incident Communications Center This subsection describes how the PSAP or dispatch center fits into ICS and integrates with an Incident Communications Center. This integration is an important consideration and may impact incident resource coordination. It is necessary for many, if not most states today to not only use ICS, but also to integrate incident-based communications with daily PSAP and dispatch operations. Once an Incident Command Post (ICP) is established, there often tends to be a lack of information flow and therefore a disconnect between the ICP back to the PSAP and/or the main dispatch center. On-scene personnel may focus efforts on communicating face-to-face or between the ICP and field units. The result of this approach is that vital information is not shared and available technology and resources fail to get used. Some areas with Incident and Tactical Dispatch Teams that deploy with a command vehicle or that are based on incident-level criteria have already moved in a positive direction with regard to this challenge. Incident-based communications, once established, need to address these missioncritical elements for successful integration of the PSAP, main dispatch center, or both into ICS. Items to document in the plan include: Technology and equipment Staffing Deployment and mutual aid Information and data sharing functions Exploring the what, who, when, and where of these elements to support incidents of all levels is key to a successful incident resolution. Identify specific integration considerations and reference SOPs that address these considerations. Develop this subsection with the big picture in mind. Do not focus solely on a state, regional, or specific local agencies. This area of the document should identify opportunities to request and deploy resources at the local level, as well as inter- and intra-state mutual aid (e.g., mutual aid agreements, TERT, etc.). Cost recovery and interoperable communications can also provide additional opportunities for integration. — Economics As the name implies, this subsection includes information related to the current economic and funding environment specific to the ICS COMU Program. This can include Federal, state, and local funding for training and exercises, equipment, and mutual aid deployment (including cost recovery). Current Funding Mechanism(s). The most common funding mechanism for ICS COMU-related activities is currently through the OEC Interoperable Communications Technical Assistance Program (ICTAP). States/Territories may request COML and COMT training and COML exercises, SOP assessment and development, governance assessment and development, etc., through the SWIC.5 A COMU Exercise (COMLEX) is a good opportunity for attendees who need to complete their PTB. Plan authors can refer to the ICS Communications Unit Implementation and Best Practices guide for a list 5 OEC Technical Assistance Catalogue: www.publicsafetytools.info DHS/OEC/ICTAP 8 ICS Communications Unit Program Plan Outline of funding mechanisms that may be available. Conducting a funding source review and analysis helps to identify funding sources within the listed categories.6 List references to any Federal or state funding legislation that exists to provide the audience with an idea of how ICS COMU needs are funded. Current Revenues and Costs. Present data on any revenues and expenditures that may be part of the ICS COMU Program. Describe state, regional, and local relationships that are part of planning for revenue, costs, and cost recovery. Full and advanced ICS COMU Programs will likely have more costs associated with technology and equipment.7 List potential new costs. Costs may change as states expand training and exercises to include INCM, RADO, AUXCOMM and others, not just COML and COMT. With new technology we now have the ability to share radio resources (Voice over Internet Protocol [VoIP] , interoperability networks, common talk groups, etc.), and there will be new costs that may be shared between state, regional, and local agencies. It is important to note that the existing cost recovery and funding allocation mechanisms do not account for new or shared costs. Funding and cost allocation may be further complicated if agencies share network components. Organizations can implement ICS COMU Programs element by element or use a strategic planning process. Each implementation will have its own unique stakeholder group, interoperability resources (shared and independent), operational needs and expectations (man-made and/or natural disasters), as well as its own unique funding and cost allocation needs. Allocating and Distributing Federal, State, Regional, and Local Funding for Equipment, Operations, and Personnel. Describe the process to allocate and distribute funds and include a sustainability model. Fund distribution between states and local agencies differs from one state to another, and depends on a variety of factors, including statutory requirements. State statutes generally define the purposes for using or not using specific funds. Many variables can affect how much funding is available, as well as the process for acquiring it. In situations where a state-level agency receives funds, the state redistributes them, with the smallest portion going to the state for its administrative costs and the largest portion sent back to local governments. States determine the actual amount to be distributed to each region or county in a variety of ways, including population, subscriber count, percentage, and budget/funding requests. Federal funding is rapidly becoming scarce. The current year’s SAFECOM grant guidance can provide valuable information that can assist in applying for grant funding opportunities.8 6 A set of ICS COMU funding and sustainment strategy forms are described in Part 2 of the ICS Communications Unit Implementation and Best Practices guide. Download them at http://www.publicsafetytools.info/ or http://www.search.org/products. 7 Review the ICS Communications Unit Assessment and Development Matrix for definitions of early, moderate, full, and advanced programs. Download the matrix at http://www.publicsafetytools.info/ or www.search.org/products. 8 SAFECOM Guidance of Emergency Communications Grants: http://www.safecomprogram.gov/library/lists/library/DispForm.aspx?ID=334 DHS/OEC/ICTAP 9 ICS Communications Unit Program Plan Outline — Mutual Aid Considerations and EMAC Some states require regional policy development to dictate how to request an ICS COMU resource at the regional level first. The state then develops a complementary policy expanding the process to go beyond the region when a regional resource is not available. These policies should describe who maintains the list of ICS COMU resources in the state and the procedure for requesting them. States should also consider how to manage requests for an ICS COMU from across a state border. Making ICS COMU resources available through the Emergency Management Assistance Compact (EMAC) and existing cross-border Memorandums of Understanding helps streamline requests and deployments during emergencies. This subsection should specify how to request, deploy, and use ICS COMU resources, during interstate and intrastate mutual aid situations based on the policies. It does not need to repeat the policies, just summarize them, and provide links to find them. During times of an emergency, National Emergency Management Agency (NEMA) staff works with EMAC member states to ensure that a smooth relay of information passes through the EMAC system to coordinate relief efforts. States may use EMAC for any capability—no matter how large or small, how typical or specialized—that one member state has available that it can share with another member state. As long as there is a governor-declared state of emergency, you can request resources using EMAC.9 EMAC’s website also offers educational resources and library documents that can help determine the types of information that need to be contained in this section. Future Environment The ICS Communications Unit Implementation and Best Practices guide provides a detailed overview of future environment considerations for ICS COMU Program development. This section should reflect considerations specific to the state, region, or local agency programs and how they dovetail together. Goals, Objectives, and Measures — Developing a Vision, Goals, Objectives, and Performance Measures This section describes the vision for the ICS COMU program at the state, regional, and local level. The vision statement brings a tangible reality to what the program will address by developing COMU-specific positions and plays a major role in defining the program scope and developing realistic objectives and milestones.10 A vision statement answers the question: What will success look like?11 Like other sections, the information contained in this section will be unique to each state, region, or agency. The items on this list are the key elements of the ICS Communications Unit Program Assessment and Development Matrix.12 This is not an 9 http://www.emacweb.org/ LETG, at page 52. Alliance for Nonprofit Management: www.allianceonline.org 12 The ICS Communications Unit Program Assessment and Development Matrix is a supplement to the ICS Communications Unit Implementation and Best Practices guide. It is available for download at http://www.publicsafetytools.info/ or http://www.search.org/products 10 11 DHS/OEC/ICTAP 10 ICS Communications Unit Program Plan Outline exhaustive list—however, ICS communications experts and SEARCH project staff think it contains the primary elements that program coordinators should consider and measure: Governance (Leadership, Decision-making Structure, Agreements, Strategic Planning, SWIC Integration, State Training Officer [STO] Integration) Funding (Operational, Sustainability) Training, Exercises, and Staffing (Initial Training, Recurrent Training, Exercises, COML, COMT, AUXCOMM, INCM, RADO, Instructor, Other Positions) Recognition and Currency (PTB, Currency) SOPs (Policies, Procedures, and Practices) Usage (Requests, Deployment, Integration) Other User-Defined Elements ICS COMU Program Planning (Program Plan, Communications Plan, Risk Management Plan) We should be clear here that there are actually two sets of goals and objectives: 1. One set relates to the goals and objectives for the overall ICS COMU Program. This set relates to the overall strategic planning process and is the focus of this section of the plan. 2. The second set is part of the project plan to implement the ICS COMU Program. Steps for creating and monitoring the implementation goals and objectives of an ICS COMU Project Plan are located in the ICS Communications Unit Implementation and Best Practices guide. — Tracking Progress SCIPs, TICPs, and ICS COMU Program Plans are all dynamic documents. As lessons are learned, technology advances, and as the social, economic, and environmental factors change, you should expect to update the plans. This section should describe the process that will be used to track and measure progress and update the plan. The ICS Communications Unit Assessment and Development Matrix referenced throughout this document is intended to be used for this purpose. Resource Allocation This section of the plan is not exactly what you would think after reviewing the ICS Communications Unit Implementation and Best Practices guide. This section actually outlines the resources needed to implement the plan, not the number of trained or response-ready ICS COMU personnel. This section includes the resource needs to actually execute the ICS COMU Program Plan. This could include personnel such as the SWIC, STO, Emergency Support Function #2 (ESF2) Coordinator, administrative support, non-staff expertise, funding priorities, and others. The focus of this section is on the overall ICS COMU Program, not just the implementation aspect of it. DHS/OEC/ICTAP 11 ICS Communications Unit Program Plan Outline Questions this section should answer include: Are current staffing levels adequate to support ICS COMU Program initiatives and tasks? Does existing staff have the necessary expertise? This section should also describe how you plan to allocate and/or train resources. For example, if the expertise does not exist, the question becomes how to acquire it. Methods include: Collaborative agreements with another state agency or organization that has employees with the necessary expertise. Hiring consultants or other subject matter experts with the specific knowledge, skills, and experience that are required. Updating the Plan The ICS Communications Unit Implementation and Best Practices guide includes considerations regarding the process and frequency for updating an ICS COMU Program Plan. This section of the Program Plan should contain the language specific to that process, along with identifying who is responsible for it. This section can describe handling revisions—anything more significant than administrative—through a more formal process that engages users and stakeholders. Individuals who were involved in the original process would be ideal; however, with typical staff turnover, it is unlikely that will be possible. The process should also be flexible enough to address lessons learned, technology upgrades, and legislative changes in a timely manner. How to accomplish the updates will be a decision each ICS COMU governance structure will have to determine. The important thing is to define a process. Governance and Managing the ICS Communications Unit Program All the information relating to governance and coordination appears in this section of the ICS COMU Program Plan, including the organizational structure. This will be unique to each state and include roles, responsibilities, and authority of the decision-making structure, stakeholder involvement, service providers, equipment vendors, etc. No matter what the final governance structure looks like, some of the responsibilities of program management include: Coordinate the development and implementation of the ICS COMU Program Plan. Provide a single point of accountability for ICS COMU Program issues. Review and update the plan. Coordinate ICS COMU Program implementation activities. Provide a clearinghouse for information about state, regional, local, and national ICS COMU issues. Gather and disseminate information on how the plan’s initiatives are progressing. Be the liaison between other ICS COMU stakeholders. DHS/OEC/ICTAP 12 ICS Communications Unit Program Plan Outline — Implementation Plan The ICS Communications Unit Implementation and Best Practices guide addresses the importance of engaging in a flexible project management process, including developing a Project Charter and detailed Project Plan. You can include information relating to the ICS COMU Program Project Plan here, along with a project schedule. Conclusion This section provides a recap and review of the key points of an ICS COMU Program. It can include a brief outline of any significant gaps and provide recommendations for program development. References This section includes information related to the references used to develop the ICS COMU Program Plan. This is important to establish continuity of research and data between updates. It can save those tasked with updating the plan time by allowing stakeholders to locate resources easily when they need supporting documentation. Appendixes This section includes information referenced elsewhere in the ICS COMU Program Plan but may need to be listed at the end of document rather than in the body. This could include copies of the assessment, funding strategy information, and copies of the Communications or Risk Management Plans, etc. — Glossary This section identifies industry terms and acronyms. Including a glossary, or referring readers to an external resource, will assist those not familiar with or new to the profession. It also assists in making sure stakeholders are on the same map and talk the same language. DHS/OEC/ICTAP 13