Strategic Response Plan for Nigeria 2014

advertisement
FINAL DRAFT – FINALISED DOCUMENT AVAILABLE SOON
2014-2016
STRATEGIC
Response Plan
Nigeria
January 2014
Prepared by OCHA
The boundaries and names shown and the designations used in this document do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the
Humanitarian Country Team.
STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN
Nigeria
SUMMARY
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES
1. Track and analyse risk and vulnerability, integrating findings into humanitarian and development
programming.
2. Support vulnerable populations to better cope with shocks by responding earlier to warning signals, by
reducing post-crisis recovery times and by building capacity of national actors.
3. Deliver coordinated and integrated life-saving assistance to people affected by emergencies.
PRIORITY ACTIONS
PERIOD:
January 2014 – December 2016
100%
170 million: Total population (annual
growth rate of 2.5% with 140 million
recorded in census of 2006)
9.5 million: Estimated number of
people affected by conflict and natural
disaster
5.5%
8.3 million
of total population
People in need
4.8%
8.3 million
of total population
People targeted for humanitarian
assistance in this plan
4.8%
7.2 million
of total population
Key categories of people in
need:
3.9
million undernourished people
4.2
million food insecure people
(North eastern Nigeria)
194,859
Internally Displaced Persons
(IDPs)
Source: UNCIEF, NEMA, UNCT
assessment
75 million
requested by UN and NGOs
humanitarian actors
2
PARAMETERS OF THE RESPONSE
of total population
From sahelian states and northern
Nigeria targeted for humanitarian
assistance in this plan
4.2%

Improve access to protection and assistance to civilians in conflict
areas, including for the internally displaced.

Provide essential primary and secondary health services
(preventive and curative) by addressing chronic diseases, reproductive
health, infant and child health and treatment and prevention of acute
malnutrition.

Increase monitoring of early warning and early detection of
possible outbreaks of communicable diseases. Initiate of an effective
response for disease control.

Intervene where necessary to promote livelihoods, rehabilitate
damaged infrastructures and supportincome generating activities, to
provide immediate economic relief to affected populations in rural and
urban areas.
While the Humanitarian Needs Overview (HNO) comprised a countrywide
assessment of needs, the Strategic Response Plan (SRP) has prioritized
response mainly in northern Nigeria. The prioritization of response in this
part of the country is due mainly to the prevalence of critical humanitarian
challenges in the region as a result of lingering malnutrition affecting half a
million children and the impact of armed confrontation between militant
insurgent groups and the Nigerian army, which has left close to 6 million
people food insecure.
A total of 9.5 million people are currently affected by conflict and natural
disaster in Nigeria. Humanitarian partners have targeted 8.3 million people
for humanitarian assistance. Of the amount targeted, 7.2 million are from
the 8 sahelian states and an additional 3 states in northern Nigeria which
face similar humanitarian challenges to the sahelian states.
An estimated 4.2 million people in three states in the north-east of the
country declared by the Government to be under a state of emergency
(SoE) will be targeted for assistance, while 323,488 severe acute
malnourished children under the age of five will be treated in eleven
Nigeria
STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN
northern states1. The Strategic Response Plan (SRP) has been developed through joint planning and consultation
between the National Emergency Management Agency (NEMA); nine humanitarian sectors co-led by Government
line ministries and United Nations agencies; non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and six sub-national
geopolitical zones representing Nigeria’s 36 states. Given the population and size of the country, data collection is
a resource-demanding task. Continuous data collection has been prioritized by humanitarian actors across the
country on an on-going basis. As new information emerges from these assessments data collection efforts the
Humanitarian Needs Overview (HNO) will be updated accordingly. However, information on food security and on
planning for internally displaced persons (IDPs), has not been readily available; hence the immediate need to elicit
relevant information in these sectors for effective planning and response.
Of the total population of 9.5 million, 8.3 million will be targeted for
response on the basis of figures received from the Government, the
UN and NGOs. According to the National Emergency Management
Agency (NEMA) about 124,859 people displaced as a result of flooding
following rains between June and August 2013 remained displaced at
the end of 2013. According to the NEMA update of December 2013,
the Local Government Areas (LGA) in a state of emergency which
have been most affected by the insurgency are Metropolitan
Maiduguri, Kaga, Goza, Bama, Dambua, Baga in Kukawa, Marte,
Gubiyo, Abadam (Malam Fatori), Damsac, Mungunu, Ngalia and
Konduga in Borno state; Damaturu, Yadin Buni, Gujuba, Potiskum,
Fika, Gashua, Gaidam and Fune in Yobe state and Mubi, Ganye and
Song in Adamawa state. An estimated 4,732,802 people count
amongst the worst affected in SoE areas.
According to the latest UN country team (UNCT) assessment of SoE
states, 5,972,760 million people have been affected by the insurgency
in Borno, Adamawa and Yobe states. This includes 27 LGAs in Borno
state, 6 LGAs in Adamawa state (Mubi North, Yola North, Yola South,
Girei, Numan, and Mayo Belwa) and 5 LGAs in Yobe state (Damaturu,
Potiskum, Geidem, Fune, Gujba). According to OCHA monitoring
reports, 70,000 people were displaced from Taraba, Benue,
Nasarawa, Kaduna, Kogi and Plateau states as a result of
intercommunal conflict.
PRIORITY HUMANITARIAN
NEEDS
1
Protection of civilians
2
Provision of life saving
assistance
3
Improved humanitarian
access
4
Better preparedness
5
Building resilience
Full HNO:
http://wca.humanitarianresponse.info
UNICEF has projected that 1,790,920 people are likely to be malnourished in 2014 in 11 northern states. This
figure includes 539,147 children under five who are expected to suffer from severe acute malnutrition (SAM) while
1,251,773 people are predicted to suffer from moderate acute malnutrition (MAM) in 11 states in 2014. 90,823 of
children under the age of five are expected to suffer from Severe Acute Malnutrition (SAM) are in Borno, Yobe and
Adamawa. Epidemic-prone diseases such as measles, meningitis, cholera and Lassa fever occur as recurrent
outbreaks. In 2013, a total of 53,023 confirmed measles cases and 2,771 deaths were reported in 753 LGAs in the
36 states and in the Federal Capital Territory; as many as 6,600 suspected cases of cholera with 229 deaths were
reported in 94 LGAs in 20 states; 1,195 suspected Lassa fever cases and 39 deaths were reported in 14 states (27
LGAs) and 871 suspected cerebrospinal meningitis cases with 47 deaths in 28 states over the same period.
CONTENTS
Summary....................................................................................................................................................................... 2
Contents ........................................................................................................................................................................ 3
1
Adamawa, Bauchi, Borno, Gombe, Jigawa, Kano, Katsina, Kebbi, Sokoto, Yobe and Zamfara
3
STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN
Nigeria
Strategy......................................................................................................................................................................... 6
Strategic objectives and indicators ............................................................................................................................... 9
Cluster plans ...............................................................................................................................................................13
COORDINATION ...................................................................................................................................................................... 14
EDUCATION ............................................................................................................................................................................. 16
FOOD SECURITY ...................................................................................................................................................23
HEALTH.................................................................................................................................................................................... 30
NUTRITION .............................................................................................................................................................................. 34
SHELTER AND NON FOOD ITEMS......................................................................................................................................... 38
PROTECTION .......................................................................................................................................................................... 42
WATER SANITATION AND HYGIENE ..................................................................................................................................... 46
ANNEX: Financement Requis ....................................................................................................................................57
4
Nigeria
STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN
5
STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN
Nigeria
STRATEGY
People in need and targeted
Since 2012, the UN, INGOs and the Government have carried out assessments in various locations in order to
ascertain the extent of needs occasioned by disasters. . The joint UN and Government assessments highlighted
the needs of over 2.1 million and 124,859 people affected by flooding in 2012 and 2013 respectively. The
prioritization analysis conducted in 2013 for the (HNO helped the humanitarian community to further define its
targeting per sector. The sectors took into account capacity of partners and government-planned responses, which
they plan to complement. The sectors are targeting assistance as follows: coordination 8.3 million people,
education 600,000 people, food security and agriculture 1 million people; health 1.8 million, nutrition 323,488,
shelter 2.5 million, protection 500,000 and water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) 2 million.
Figure 1: Number of people in need
Category
Female
Male
194,859
IDPs
Food Insecure (northern Nigeria)
TOTAL
2,008,030
Malnourished
TOTAL
2,818,620
4,189,650
3.900,920
8.375,429
Source: UNICEF, NEMA, OCHA
Planning assumptions
As stated in the HNO, insurgency in the north-east, inter-communal conflict in the north, malnutrition and food
insecurity in the Sahel region, election violence, epidemics (cholera) and flooding, will all continue to threaten the
lives and livelihoods of the population of Nigeria in 2014. In developing the planning assumptions for 2014, the
SRP critically analysed the likely scenarios that would play out based on the dynamics and complexities of the
various humanitarian challenges that are being addressed.
The aftermath of insurgency and the subsequent declaration of a state of emergency in the three northern states of
Borno, Yobe and Adamawa in 2013 will likely continue to disrupt markets, impact household farming and livelihood
activities and cause displacement in 2014. In addition, the 6-month extension of the state of emergency
(November-May 2014) and the unabated killings and heightened insecurity, may continue to narrow the
humanitarian space while food insecurity, which is currently projected at Integrated Food Security Phase
Classification (IPC) Phase 32 from January to March 2014, will further deteriorate throughout the extension period.
Also, poor households affected by this conflict may rely on sales of productive assets, such as livestock, farmland
and farm tools in order to meet their basic food consumption needs. In addition, households that are still recovering
from the impact of the floods in 2012 and those recovering from the disrupted harvest due to prolonged dryness in
northern, central and north-western zones are likely to continue to meet basic food consumption needs with a tight
margin. Long-term solutions are essential if displaced and other vulnerable people are to rebuild their lives.
Although the Government at national and sub-national levels has continued to provide some support to reduce the
extent of food insecurity among the most vulnerable, much more has to be done to improve targeting through better
2
6
IPC refers to Integrated Food Security Phase Classification system
Nigeria
STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN
identification of vulnerable groups, more accurate estimates of the level and type of support needed and overall
preparedness for emergencies. It is important to ensure that relevant programmes are put in place and sufficiently
supported to reduce vulnerabilities and chronic malnutrition, through better response planning and programming,
including institutionalizing safety-net programmes for the most vulnerable and the food insecure. Financial support
will be key to speeding up implementation of programmes.
Figure 2: Number of people targeted
Category
Female
Male
IDPs
111069
83,789
194,859
Food Insecure
570,000
430,000
1.,000,000
Education
258,000
34,200
600,000
Malnourished
184,388
139,099
1,026,000
774,000
1.800.000
285,000
215,000
500,000
WASH
1,140,000
860,000
2,000.000
Shelter and NFI
1,115,536
841,548
1,957082
TOTAL
4,773,993
3,601,436
8,375,429
Health
Protection
TOTAL
323,488
Source: Nigeria HNO, December 2013
Strategy
Strategic objectives have been designed on the basis of consultation at international, national and sub-national,
government and non-government level, to address priority needs and ensure multi-sectoral response in line with
each objective.The present objectives are aligned with priority categories set out by the Government and the
humanitarian country team in Nigeria. The SRP is designed to complement government programmes and meet the
needs of disaster-affected people in the areas of livelihood recovery, food security and agriculture, sanitation,
hygiene, health, and education. Protection issues will remain a key concern until the Government lifts the state of
emergency declared in the north-eastern states.
Following the 2012 flooding, the Government developed a comprehensive Post Disaster Needs Assessment
(PDNA) aimed at ensuring recovery and rehabilitation. Though the PDNA has not been implemented, it presents a
comprehensive picture of the damage and residual needs of the population affected by the floods. In developing
the SRP, the Government and humanitarian community agreed to factor in the PDNA, to cover residual
humanitarian needs and to support resilience and recovery.
In addition, it was agreed that the SRP should be guided by the following criteria:
1. Each project can realistically be implemented by the organization concerned, with reasonable scale-up where
necessary.
2. Projects target the most vulnerable groups according to vulnerability criteria. This is to be achieved by each
sector continuously collecting, analysing and applying sex- and age-disaggregated data.Establish evidence
based needs specific to the location and caseload of each project to be addressed.
3. Projects strengthen the resilience of people and systems to mitigate shocks in the longer term.
7
STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN
Nigeria
4. Develop mechanisms which national and local government can continue using independently of international
players.
Scope of the strategy
The 2014 plan seeks to meet the “strategic needs” of a population spanning six geo-political zones in Nigeria:
North-West, North-East, North-Central, South-South, South-East and South-West. This is predicated on the
complexity and dynamics of a humanitarian crisis that cuts across different regions. However, the SRP will pay
particular attention to the north considering the extent of humanitarian challenges identified from 2010 to 2013,
which are likely to persist due mainly to the declaration of a state of emergency and the on-going malnutrition crisis.
This SRP covers 24 months and clearly identifies areas where the Government and international partners can
cooperate to achieve sustainable improvements in living conditions and livelihoods for the most vulnerable
members of the population.
Priorities within the scope of the strategy
The projects in the SRP are designed around the five humanitarian priorities identified at regional level, that is, food
insecurity, malnutrition, conflict, epidemics and natural disaster. In setting these strategic priorities and especially in
selecting projects, the Government and the humanitarian country team agreed to the following:
Project selection guidance
The appealing organization and its implementing partners should have the capacity to implement the
1
project.
2
The appealing organization should be a member of the sector.
3
The project will align with the HNO and must meet the needs of the affected population.
4
The project should contribute to one or more sector strategic objectives.
5
The project should fall within the list of prioritized locations for the sectors or with justification accepted.
The project should have a clear target population, planned outputs, expected outcomes and
6
performance indictors.
The project should identify and respond to the distinct needs of women, girls, boys and men, or justify
7
its focus on one group.
8
The project should not duplicate activities implemented by other organisations.
9
The project activities should be feasible within the 12 month timeframe of the plan.
The project should be cost-effective in terms of the number of affected people assisted and the needs
10
to which the project responds.
The generic project selection criteria above were provided for sector coordinators to use in addition to the sector
specific criteria. The criteria reinforced the principle of working within targeted locations addressing gender,
environmental and accountability considerations.
Cross-cutting and context-specific issues
Gender
Humanitarian actors in Nigeria have committed to ensuring and promoting gender equality in the humanitarian
response through the application of the Gender Marker, a tool designed to ensure that all segments of the target
population will benefit equally. This will be achieved through working with sectors and implementing partners on
two aspects: first, to build capacity around the design of “gender equality programming” to ensure more equitable
participation and an appropriate distribution of humanitarian assistance. Second, to ensure monitoring of project
implementation takes into account gender equality considerations.
Early Recovery
Early recovery plans should be integrated into humanitarian work to ensure the dividends of humanitarian response
are sustainable and interventions link to longer-term development processes and goals. Although life-saving
support remains the first priority, early recovery approaches aim to restore services, livelihoods and governance
capacity, which are conducive to an environment where the displaced have the opportunity to access essential
services, have viable livelihoods, and live in safety and dignity. Early recovery approaches also seek to involve
8
Nigeria
STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN
local authorities and communities in the planning as much as possible. Early recovery-centred approaches are not
new to Nigeria; the Nigeria National Strategic Plan, the interim Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper (PRSP) and the
2013-2016 United Nations Development Assistance Framework (UNDAF) all reflect a policy-driven emphasis on
opportunity-based transitions from relief to development.
Constraints and how the sectors will address them
The main constraint to the execution of this emergency response plan especially in north-eastern Nigeria is the
insecurity due to the violent insurgency of Boko Haram, which has led to complete collapse of economic activities
and displacement of thousands of households into neighbouring states and to refugees crossing borders to Niger,
Cameroun and Chad. One upshot of the conflict has been a reduction in household food production in the region.
Access to most of northern Nigeria is constrained due to insecurity, making data collection for humanitarian
planning a challenge. Sectors will address the above constraints through regular assessment of the security
situation in the north-east and will adjust their projects accordingly. The UN in particular will implement the
recommendations from the programme criticality assessment conducted in 2012 as one of the measures to
minimize risks in the highly insecure environment of Nigeria. Periodic joint meetings will be held with the
humanitarian country team to evaluate the security situation, and decisions will be taken as to security advisories
so that humanitarian actors are able to deliver assistance and remain safe.
Direct efforts will be geared towards strengthening institutional capacities of relevant Government line ministries
and agencies in data collection and management. Close collaboration will also be developed between stakeholders
to reduce vulnerability and build community resilience, especially in flood and drought prone areas. Regular
vulnerability assessments and food and nutrition analyses will be envisaged, especially in the Sahelian regions of
Nigeria where drought is more frequent.
Response monitoring
The Government and humanitarian country team in Nigeria will set up and manage a response monitoring
framework. The monitoring framework will outline the process, timing, and responsibilities for the gathering and
analysis of data on the collective humanitarian response; set forth scheduled intervals for reporting key findings;
and provide evidence for decision-making and corrective action. The inter-sectoral coordination group will track and
analyse outcome and output indicators and measure progress against the strategic objectives of the response.
Sector coordinators will aggregate project outputs and assess outcome indicators, and measure progress towards
sector objectives while individual organizations will register their projects’ output results and feed them to the
respective sectors.
Analysis of monitoring information will feed into a number of reporting products, including the Humanitarian Bulletin,
the Humanitarian Dashboard, and sector reports. The frequency of reporting will be quarterly for most indicators. In
the first few months following the launch of the SRP, output-level reporting will be carried out on a monthly basis.
The first report was released at the end of January 2014. Outcome-level monitoring will take place at mid-term
review and at the end of the SRP cycle.
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES AND INDICATORS
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE 1: Track and analyse risk and vulnerability, integrating
findings into humanitarian and development programming
Indicator
Baseline and targets
Explanation/Monitoring method
9
STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN
Indicator
Nigeria
Baseline and targets
Base
End2014
Explanation/Monitoring method
2015
2016
Early warning mechanisms
established for food security,
malnutrition, epidemics,
displacement and disasters
Number of priority risks (food
security, malnutrition, epidemics,
displacement and disasters) that
have early warning mechanisms e.g.
the Cadre Harmonise for food
security
Food Security
FEWSNET
2
2
2
Nutrition
Nutrition
survey
(SMART)
2
4
6
62
62
62
Existence of vulnerability data sets Vulnerability
for all sectors and regions
Mapping
2
4
6
Number of sectors with vulnerability
data sets (e.g. CH for food sec)
Risk and vulnerability analysis
45%
integrated in country UNDAFs,
Common Country Assessments
(CCA) and SRPs and other key
international planning instruments
55%
80%
100%
Percentage of international planning
instruments existing in country which
include a risk and vulnerability
analysis
Epidemics
Collected by the Food Sec, Nutrition,
Health, Protection Clusters and
OCHA and/or RCO
Weekly CSM
Update
National development plans and
budgets target
vulnerablepopulation
Yes
Collected by OCHA and/or RCO
through document review.
Yes
Yes
Yes
This is a yes/ no indicator
Collected by OCHA and/or RCO
through document review.
Agricultural investments target
marginalised and vulnerable
households (AGIR indicator)
10%
20%
40%
60%
Percentage of agricultural
investments targeting marginalised
and vulnerable households. This
indicator is included in the AGIR
framework.
Collected by FAO and/or the Food
Security Cluster by document
review.
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE 2: Support vulnerable populations to better cope with
shocks by responding earlier to warning signals, by reducing post-crisis recovery
times and by building capacity of national actors
Indicator
10
Baseline and targets
Explanation/Monitoring method
Nigeria
STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN
Indicator
Baseline and targets
Base
Improve coping capacity of affected 15.1
households (measured by the coping
strategies index (CSI)
Explanation/Monitoring method
End2014
2015
2016
-
-
-
This index has been used in Niger by
WFP. It measures the coping capacity
and recovery period
WFP at regional level is supportive of
expanding its use to other Sahel
countries. We would discuss with
WFP in country.
Increase recovery rates of affected
households (measured by the Coping
Strategies
20
Development and implementation of Yes
national social protection policies and
programmes (AGIR)
Stabilisation or improvement of overall
Cadre Harmonisé classification in
livelihood zones over two seasons as
a result of continued humanitarian
assistance
7
An Early Action trigger mechanism for Yes
emergencies developed and
operational
25
30
35
Same as above
Yes
Yes
Yes
This is Yes/No indicator
8
8
8
Percentage of Admin 2 zones that
remain stable or improve in the CH
classification over a two season
period.
Collected by Food Security Cluster
using PREGEC seasonal
assessments
Yes
Yes
Yes
This is a Yes/No indicator
Collected by OCHA and/or RCO
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE 3: Deliver coordinated and integrated life-saving assistance
to people affected by emergencies
Indicator
People affected by emergencies
receiving life-saving assistance
Baseline and targets
Explanation/Monitoring method
Base
End-2014 2015
2016
70%
90%
100%
100%
Percentage of people affected
receiving life-saving assistance.
Collected by OCHA with data from
clusters.
Percentage funding spread between 60%
70%
90%
100%
Percentage reduction in funding
11
STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN
Indicator
Nigeria
Baseline and targets
Explanation/Monitoring method
clusters
differences between sectors
Measured by calculating the %
average of the funding differences
among sectors in the appeal
Collected by OCHA using FTS data
Number of people in Cadre
Harmonise phase 3+4
-
-
-
-
(Food insecurity)
Reduction of number of people
Cadre Harmonise classification
phase 3 (crisis) and phase 4
(urgency)
Collected by Food Security Cluster
using PREGEC assessments
% of Children < 5 years with Severe 78.8%
Acute Malnutrition discharged
recovered (Malnutrition)
Crude mortality rate (CMR) trend
78.8%
78.8%
78.8%
4.6/1000 4.6/1000 4.6/1000
Negative trend of CMR
(Epidemics/Health)
Under-5 mortality rate
(U5MR) trend
Collected by Nutrition cluster
Collected by Health cluster
166
215
280
365
Negative trend of U5MR
Collected by Health cluster
(Epidemics/Health)
Number of affected vulnerable
500,000
people (children, women, men)
having received a timely and
functional WASH minimum package
adapted to their vulnerability(ies)
(WASH)
12
30%
50%
80%
Increase in number of affected
vulnerable people receiving the
WASH minimum package
Collected by WASH cluster
Nigeria
STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN
CLUSTER PLANS
PEOPLE IN NEED
PEOPLE TARGETED
REQUIREMENTS (US$)
9.5 million
8.3 million
74.9 million
Coordination
Protection
9,500,000
500,000
Emergency
Shelter
Nutrition
1,957,082
4,200,000
Health
1,800,000
Coordination
4
9,400,000
Protection
2
8,000,000
Emergency Shelter
3,900,000
323,488
Food Security
8,300,000
4,200,000
in need
targeted
Nutrition
1
1
Food Security
5
Health
4
2,500,000
Education
Education
WASH
600,000
2,000,000
1
2,000,000
WASH
4,600,000
Early recovery
5
2
Early Recovery
People in need
(in thousands)
People targeted
(in thousands)
Requirements
(in millions of US$)
Coordination
8.078.433
Early Recovery
8.050.000
Education
6,580,361
Food Security
10,683.159
Health
9,167,347
Emergency Shelter
4,500,000
Nutrition
2,333,666
Protection
2,752.831
WASH
11,937,502
TOTAL
74,860,697
13
STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN
Nigeria
COORDINATION
Lead agency: National Emergency Management Agency (NEMA) and OCHA
Contact information: Choice Okoro, OCHA okoroc@un.org
PEOPLE IN NEED
PEOPLE TARGETED
REQUIREMENTS (US$)
9.5 million
8.3 million
2.6 million
# OF PARTNERS
105
Government and humanitarian partners have been increasingly aware of the need to strengthen their joint efforts in
responding to emergencies in Nigeria. The magnitude of the 2012 floods and the deteriorating situation in the
north-east have highlighted the pressing need for more coordinated and more strategic planning among emergency
management institutions (NEMA, SEMAs, Commission for Refugees and line ministries) and humanitarian
partners.
OCHA was instrumental in establishing the Humanitarian Country Team (HCT) comprising UN operational
agencies, INGOs and donors in 2012. The HCT was instrumental in mobilizing funds ($6.5 million) from CERF to
complement the Government’s response to the needs of 2.1 million people displaced in the 14 most affected states
in 2012, and supported joint rapid assessments in north-eastern states. In addition, OCHA helped establish an
inter-sectoral coordination mechanism which currently provides a platform for the development of the HNO and
SRP.
OCHA will continue to work with the relevant federal and state government agencies to strengthen national and
sub-national coordination. OCHA’s investment will include capacity building and training for data collection and
management, through joint assessment and collaboration with various actors including NGOs and media.
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE 1: Track and analyse risk and vulnerability, integrating
findings into humanitarian and development programming.
Activity
Locations
Mapping disaster prone areas
North-West, North
Central, SouthEast, South-South
Number of disaster
risk maps produced
and shared
Support strategic coordination
through the HCT
Abuja and across
Nigeria
Number of HCT
/UNCT meetings/by
quarter
14
Output Indicator
Cluster/Sector
partner
Mid-2014
target
End-2014
target
All
10
20
All
6
12
Nigeria
Support strategic coordination
through the ISWG and
sectors/clusters and
participation of INGOS,
NNGOs and government,
where relevant
Build the capacity of national
counterparts to increase the
ability of national institutions
to better prepare and respond
to emergencies
STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN
North-East, NorthWest, NorthCentral, SouthWest, SouthSouth, South-East
Number of ISWG
meetings/month
All
6
12
North-East, NorthWest, North
Central, SouthWest, SouthSouth, South-East
North East, NorthWest, North
Central, SouthWest, SouthSouth, South-East
Number of IS
strategic analysis
communicated to
HCT/UNCT
All
4
8
Number of
Sector/Cluster
meetings/month
All
13
27
North East, NorthWest, North
Central, SouthWest, SouthSouth, South-East
Number of INGOs
participating in
ISWG/month
All
17
20
North East, NorthWest, North
Central, SouthWest, SouthSouth, South-East
Number of
functional
coordination
mechanisms at
decentralized level
All
37
72
NEMA HQ and 6
Zonal Offices
Number of training
sessions for
national
counterparts
(national authorities
and civil society)
Mapping of
Potential Partners
with capacity for
humanitarian
response
All
2
4
All
50
60
All
30
35
All
2
3
North East, NorthWest, North
Central, Southwest, South-South,
South-East
Conduct/facilitate coordinated
multi-sectoral assessments
with key partners
North East, NorthWest, North
Central, SouthWest, SouthSouth, South-East
Trainings workshop
on developing state
level Contingency
Plan for emergency
preparedness and
response in the
selected states
Assessment
conducted in North
Eastern Nigeria, 7
flood prone states
and election
conflict hotspots
Number of
coordinated multisectoral
assessments with
the participation of
the government
15
STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN
Nigeria
Multi-sectoral analysis of
risks, vulnerabilities and
opportunities to identify
priority needs/gaps (SADD
analysis)
Nigeria
Create and regularly update
country/regional baseline of
harmonized information to
facilitate joint analysis and
better planning and
monitoring
Nigeria
Support the development and
review of country/regional
HNO and SRP
Nigeria
Develop humanitarian
information products as
appropriate to support the
situational understanding,
humanitarian assessment and
evidence-based response
Nigeria
Prioritisation tool
(PT) regularly
updated
Number of risk
analysis that include
SADD
Database regularly
updated and
accessible to key
stakeholders
All
1
2
All
2
4
Number of HNO
and SRP developed
and updated
# of PT fully
operational and
regularly updated
(quarterly)
# of sectoral WG
contributing to the
elaboration of
common strategy
All
1
1
All
9
9
Number ok key
information
products developed
per reporting
schedule
(snapshots,
dashboards, sitreps,
bulletins, 3Ws, etc.)
All
10
20
EDUCATION
Lead agency: name United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF)
Contact information: Judith Giwa –Amu jgiwaamu@unicef.org, +234 8033149205
PEOPLE IN NEED
PEOPLE TARGETED
REQUIREMENTS (US$)
2 million
600,000
6.5 million
N0 OF PARTNERS
3
16
Nigeria
STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN
It is estimated that 600,000 Nigerian children have difficulty accessing education due to man made and natural
disasters3. With the incessant attacks on schools, students and parents, the schooling environment has become
increasingly insecure and many schools in disaster affected areas are being used as shelters for displaced people.
Across the twelve states affected by floods in 2012, 4,199 schools (3,205 primary schools and 994 secondary
schools) were either partially or severely damaged (PDNA, 2012). This resulted in the disruption of schooling and
in the displacement of students to neighbouring schools which established a double shift system to cope with
overcrowding. The use of school buildings as temporary shelters resulted in the loss of teaching and learning
hours, poor coverage of curriculum content and failure to achieve school goals and objectives. Parents who could
previously afford the higher fees imposed by private schools enrolled their children in public schools while many
children from poor families were forced to drop out of school during this critical period, thus exacerbating inequality
between children. In addition, school facilities were generally overstretched, and some furniture was taken for
firewood by IDPs. In many cases, the government has not been quick to restore the damaged structures so that
children can return to school. For this and other reasons, it is suggested that provision for alternative shelter
spaces should be made in preparedness and contingency plans.
Recurrent attacks on schools, learners and teachers have been reported in SoE states. In cities in north eastern
Nigeria such as Maiduguri, many children can only attend school irregularly, while others have missed up to two
years of schooling. The education sector, which has remained a frequent target of attacks, has been particularly
hard hit by the crisis. In Borno State, 77 schools and 533 classrooms offering basic education have been burned, 5
teachers have been killed and 9,546 desks have been destroyed. 25 teachers and three students have been killed
in the public senior secondary and high schools, and a further 10 students and one teacher suffered the same fate
in private schools. Ministry of Education materials and buildings have also been vandalized in some schools by
unknown gunmen. In Yobe, 21 schools have been burned down while others are in need of rehabilitation. For
details, see Annex 2.
Basic education has been the most affected aspect, and efforts to build back will take a long time. According to the
survey supported by UNICEF in 2013, most communities reported that schools are not functioning. The escalating
level of violence is threatening the education of hundreds of thousands of children as school attendance has
plummeted in many areas affected by the conflict. Given the complex situation in these states, a more systematic
approach is required to ensure delivery of education services is conflict sensitive and designed with explicit peace
building interventions in mind in order to achieve better and more sustainable results for children.
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE 1: Track and analyse risk and vulnerability, integrating
findings into humanitarian and development programming
Joint Humanitarian Priority #1 FLOOD
Activity
Locations
Output Indicator
Cluster/SectorMid-2014
Partner
target
Actively involve community in the North East, NorthNumber of
CSACEFA,
risks and vulnerabilities analysis West, North Central, consultations held CELDA,
South-West, South- that include
Ministry of
50
End-2014
target
100
3
Education Sector intervention targets the most affected/vulnerable children and adolescents and directs support to a percentage of
all the affected
17
STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN
Activity
Nigeria
Locations
Output Indicator
Cluster/SectorMid-2014
Partner
target
South, South-East
teachers and
students
Education
North East, NorthWest, North Central
Analyse the coordination
mechanisms in the targeted
areas
North-West Region
Community
prioritized
education activities CSACEFA,
CELDA,
Ministry of
Education
Effective sector
coordination
mechanisms are in
place
CSACEFA,
CELDA,
Ministry of
Education
Effective intersector coordination CSACEFA,
mechanisms are in CELDA,
place
Ministry of
Education
Identify schools located in areas North East, NorthNumber of schools
at risk
West, North Central, inventoried
South-West, SouthSouth, South-East
CSACEFA,
CELDA,
Ministry of
Education
End-2014
target
360
550
2
4
2
4
20,000
40,000
Mid-2014
target
End-2014
target
50
100
360
550
1000
2000
Joint Humanitarian Priority #3-Conflict
Activity
Locations
Actively involve community in the North East Region
risks and vulnerabilities analysis
Output Indicator
Cluster/
Sector
Partner
CSACEFA,
Number of
consultations held CELDA,
Ministry of
Education
Community
prioritizes education
CSACEFA,
activities
CELDA,
Ministry of
Education
Teachers and
students are
involved in conflict CSACEFA,
analysis
CELDA,
Ministry of
Education
18
Nigeria
Activity
STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN
Locations
Evaluate the impact of conflict on North East Region
boys and girls education
Carry out risk and conflict
analyses of the education
system
North East Region
Output Indicator
Cluster/
Sector
Partner
Mid-2014
target
End-2014
target
Evaluation of
learning
achievements
before, during and
after food insecure
period
CSACEFA,
CELDA,
Ministry of
Education
1
2
Drop-out rates
disaggregated by
gender before,
during and after
food insecure
period
CSACEFA,
CELDA,
Ministry of
Education
1
2
Number of
communities
covered by the
analysis
CSACEFA,
CELDA,
Ministry of
Education
10
30
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE 2: Support vulnerable populations to better cope with
shocks by responding earlier to warning signals, by reducing post-crisis recovery
times and by building capacity of national actors.
Joint Humanitarian Priority #1 Floods
Activity
Locations
Output Indicator
Cluster/
Sector
partner
Mid-2014
target
End-2014
target
Train teachers/other educational North-Central Region Number of
personnel in hygiene promotion
male/female
teachers/other
educational
personnel trained
CSACEFA, 50
CELDA,
Ministry of
Education
100
Build capacities of MoE at
national and local level in
emergency preparedness and
response
CSACEFA, 50
CELDA,
Ministry of
Education
100
CSACEFA,
CELDA,
250
CSACEFA,
CELDA,
Ministry of
Education
500
South-West Region
Number of MoE
officials trained at
district/local level
Number of
male/female MoE
officials trained at
national level
19
STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN
Activity
Nigeria
Locations
Support and build capacities of South-East Region
local stakeholders (traditional
leaders, PTAs, parents, etc.)
involved in education
Output Indicator
Cluster/
Sector
partner
Mid-2014
target
No of parents in
target areas
participating in
parenting
education
activities
CSACEFA, 5000
CELDA,
Ministry of
Education
No of school PTAs
with agreed
emergency plan CSACEFA, 100
and safety survey CELDA,
Ministry of
Number of
Education
traditional leaders
in target areas
participating in
CSACEFA, 300
group discussions CELDA,
on the role of girls Ministry of
education, DRR, Education
psychological
support
End-2014
target
10000
200
500
Joint Humanitarian Priority # CONFLICTS
Activity
Locations
Output Indicator
Cluster/
Sector
partner
Mid-2014
target
End-2014
target
Develop peace education and South-West, South- Number of modules
conflict prevention modules
South, North
mainstreamed in the
/support MoE to mainstream Central, North-East curriculum
peace education and conflict
prevention in the curriculum
CSACEFA, 2
CELDA,
Ministry of
Education
2
Disseminate key messages on South-West, Southemergency life skills to
South, North
children and youth in
Central, North-East
temporary learning spaces
/schools
Number of emergency
affected learning
spaces/schools providing
key messages
CSACEFA, 10
CELDA,
Ministry of
CSACEFA,
CELDA,
Ministry of
Education
20
Raise awareness on conflict North Central,
resolution and social
Northcohesion i.e.
East
Decrease in violent
CSACEFA, 50%
behaviour/incidents at
CELDA,
school/learning space in Ministry of
20
80%
Nigeria
Activity
STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN
Locations
Output Indicator
Cluster/
Sector
partner
Mid-2014
target
Targeting traditional leaders
target areas
Education
and members, CBO, FBO,
School communities (Teachers
and children) conduct
Decrease in recorded
50%
community and school level
violations
against
CSACEFA,
Dialogues and Engages using
South-West,
schools/teachers/studentsCELDA,
selected advocacy tools and
South-South,
North
Ministry of
communication materials (with
Education
emphasis on social cohesion, Central, North-East
Number of surveyed
peacebuilding and conflict
resolution) and channels that
students/teachers
150
are culturally appropriate. At
reporting that they feel
CSACEFA,
school level –increase
South-West,
safe travelling to and from CELDA,
knowledge base of learners
South-South, North-school
Ministry of
using developed modules and
Central,
North-East
Education
manual on peacebuilding and
conflict resolution to build
children as agents of
behavioural change to their
communities.
End-2014
target
80%
250
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE 3: Deliver coordinated and integrated life-saving assistance
to people affected by emergencies.
Joint Humanitarian Priority #Flood
Activity
Locations
Output Indicator
Cluster/
Sector
Partner
Mid-2014
target
End-2014
target
Undertake rapid joint need
assessments
South-East North
Central, North East
Number of inter-cluster
or from other clusters
assessments that
include education
questions
CSACEFA,
CELDA,
Ministry of
Education
3
4
CSACEFA,
CELDA,
Ministry of
Education
2
4
100
250
Number of education
joint assessments that
include data
desegregated by
gender/age/disability
Number of schools
having conducted risk
analyses
CSACEFA,
CELDA,
Ministry of
Education
21
STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN
Nigeria
Activity
Locations
Output Indicator
Cluster/
Sector
Partner
Mid-2014
target
End-2014
target
Conduct awareness
campaigns in school on life
skills/life-saving messages
South-South, North
Central, North East
Number of boys/girls
reached
CSACEFA,
CELDA,
Ministry of
Education
2000
4000
1000
2000
Number of teachers
reached
Distribute learning kits
22
CSACEFA,
CELDA,
Ministry of
Education
North Central North Number of learning
CSACEFA, 20,000
Central
kits distributed to the CELDA,
schools
Ministry of
Education
Number of children
benefiting from the
CSACEFA,
learning kit
CELDA,
40,000
distribution
Ministry of
(boys/girls)
Education
40,000
80,000
Nigeria
STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN
FOOD SECURITY
Lead Agency: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Contact information: Louise Setshwaelo louise.setshwaelo@fao.org
PEOPLE IN NEED
PEOPLE TARGETED
REQUIREMENTS (US$)
4.2 million
1 million
10.6 million
# OF PARTNERS
10
Nigeria has suffered from multiple hazards in recent times, whether natural or man made. Many rural communities
are vulnerable to floods, drought, plant pests and livestock diseases, as well as soil erosion. Violent insurgency in
the north of the country has also resulted in social and political unrest, slowing down economic activity including
agriculture in the north-east. This has increased the risk of food security in localized areas of Borno and Yobe
states. Appropriate response measures are needed to reduce the impact of violence and unrest.
Several food security and malnutrition assessments have been undertaken by UN and partner agencies in northern
states in particular and in Nigeria in general. According to UNCT assessments of the SoE states, 5,972,760 million
persons are affected by the insurgency in Borno, Adamawa and Yobe states. This includes 27 LGAs in Borno
state, 6 LGAs in Adamawa state (Mubi North, Yola North, Yola South, Girei, Numan, Mayo Belwa) and 5 LGAs in
Yobe state (Damaturu, Potiskum, Geidem, Fune, Gujba). Around 1 million people will be targeted for support out of
the 4.2 million people assessed to be in need.
Although the government at both national and sub-national levels has continued to provide some support to reduce
the extent of food insecurity among the most vulnerable population, there is an apparent need for a combination of
life-saving assistance and longer-term measures to protect and improve the livelihood of vulnerable groups and
provide better estimates of support needed and overall preparedness measures to take for emergencies. There is
also a need to ensure that relevant programmes are put in place and sufficiently supported to reduce vulnerabilities
and chronic malnutrition, through better response planning and programming, including institutionalizing safety-net
programmes for the most vulnerable and food insecure. Similarly, more financial support is required to speed up
programme implementation. Adoption of the most appropriate transfer modality will be encouraged and a wide
range of mutually supportive interventions will be promoted, involving national, NGO and UN actors to streamline
capacity building at local, national and regional levels.
23
STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN
Nigeria
The immediate priorities for the food security sector aim to accelerate recovery from the trauma of the emergency
period rebuild household food supply chains and reinstate production capacity. Meanwhile, immediate interventions
are needed in the form of direct food supply and cash assistance to purchase food. Although federal and state
governments, philanthropists and NGOs have been providing assistance, a lot more needs to be done to reach
those affected. Some of the most vulnerable people are located in remote areas without access to markets.
Immediate interventions that can be supported under this SRP include:
 UNCT to advocate with the Government to release more grain from the national reserve to compensate for the
high food prices in the SoE states. Agencies, national and international NGOs could also be encouraged to
implement projects that support household and community coping mechanisms.
 Immediate cash transfer programme to be implemented in affected states to buy food and essential household
items such as cooking utensils and kerosene.
 Direct distribution of food items to households in the most affected communities.
 National and state based NGOs with capacity and expertise to be mobilized as partners to reach remote areas
and most vulnerable households.
These interventions would improve household food security in the short term and would keep famine and crisis at
arm’s length. For the intermediate and medium term, household capacity to build resilience will be supported. To
this end, affected farmers will be provided with seeds, fertilizer and tools making it possible for them to return and
cultivate their farmlands. To address Medium Acute Malnutrition (MAM), food-based interventions will be promoted
to improve household diet quality, and to overcome and prevent malnutrition and nutritional deficiencies especially
in children. To build resilience to climate and sustainable food security systems, conservation agriculture
techniques and use of high yielding drought resistant crop varieties will be introduced to farming communities .
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE 1: Track and analyse risk and vulnerability, integrating
findings into humanitarian and development programming
Joint Humanitarian Priority #1Food Insecurity
Activity
Locations
Output Indicator
Cluster/
Sector
partner
Identifying risk areas and
vulnerable populations through
joint analysis of Food Security,
Nutrition , and Markets
North-West and
North East States,
Flood plain areas
Abia State, Benue
State, Kogi State,
number of joint
analytical work
leading to the
identification of
risk area
FSWG
2
4
Strengthening food security
coordination at regional /
national and inter sectoral level
North-West and
North East States,
number of inter
sectoral sector
meetings
FSWG
2
4
Strengthening national Early
Warning Systems through
create public awareness at
national and sub-national
levels on rationale, concepts,
protocols/ methodologies and
use of food security
vulnerability assessments and
analysis.
North-West and
North East States,
Flood plain areas
Abia State, Benue
State, Kogi State,
No of State and
Federal level
staff trained and
able to predict
and mitigate
future crises.
FEWSNET
200
400
24
Mid-2014
target
End-2014
target
Nigeria
STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN
Activity
Locations
Output Indicator
Cluster/
Sector
partner
Training and development of
skills of national and state level
experts on the use of IPC as a
tool for food security
vulnerability analysis and
reporting.
North-West and
North East States,
Flood plain areas
Abia State, Benue
State, Kogi State,
States and
Federal level
staff trained and
able to use IPC
as a tool for food
security
vulnerability
analysis
All
200
400
Support selected states to
carryout vulnerability
assessments, analysis and
reporting for 3 years;
North-West and
North East States,
Flood plain areas
Abia State, Benue
State, Kogi State,
Support selected
states to carryout
vulnerability
assessments,
analysis and
reporting for 3
years;
FSWG
5
10
Support communication and
application/use of information
for decision making by State
and Federal government as
well as development and
humanitarian partners.
North-West and
North East States,
Flood plain areas
Abia State, Benue
State, Kogi State,
Reports used by
States and
Federal
Government to
inform policy and
programs
responses on
food security and
nutrition
FSWG
2
4
Mid-2014
target
End-2014
target
Joint Humanitarian Priority #3 Conflict
Activity
Locations
Output
Indicator
Cluster/
Sector
Partner
Analysis of the response
capacity of different actors to
address food insecurity in
conflict affected areas
North East States
number of
analyses made
All
2
4
Knowledge management and
capitalization of good
practices to ensure food
security for people affected by
a conflict
North East States
number of
actions of
capitalization of
good food
security
practices in
areas affected by
a conflict
All
1
2
Mid-2014
target
End-2014
target
Joint Humanitarian Priority #3 Disasters (Floods, droughts…)
Activity
Locations
Output Indicator
Cluster/
Sector
partner
Mid-2014
target
End-2014
target
25
STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN
Nigeria
Mid-2014
target
End-2014
target
Analysis of the response capacity North-West and North number of analyses FSWG
made
of different actors to address food East States,
Flood
plain
areas
insecurity in case of disaster
Abia State, Benue
State, Kogi State,
1
2
Communicate/share with partners North-West and North number of analyses All
at regional, national and local
East States,
shared
levels, analysis and early
Flood plain areas
warnings on food security
Abia State, Benue
following a natural disaster
State, Kogi State,
3
6
Knowledge management and North-West and
capitalization of good practices North East States,
to ensure food security of
Flood plain areas
populations facing natural
Abia State, Benue
disasters
State, Kogi State,
1
2
Activity
Locations
Output Indicator
Cluster/
Sector
partner
number of actions All
of capitalization of
good food
security practices
coping with
natural disasters
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE 2: Support vulnerable populations to better cope with
shocks by responding earlier to warning signals, by reducing post-crisis recovery
times and by building capacity of national actors
Joint Humanitarian Priority #1 Food Insecurity
Mid-2014
target
End-2014
target
North-West and North Farmers in the
All
East States,
North East and
Flood plain areas
North-West region
Abia State, Benue
adopting
State, Kogi State
adaptation
measures to
reduce the impact
of droughts and
climate change.
1
1
Promote Conservation
Agriculture (CA) techniques to
farming systems in the northern
states to build resilience and
adaptation to drought and
climate change.
North-West and North Farmers in the
All
East States,
Sahel region
Flood plain areas
adopting
Abia State, Benue
adaptation
State, Kogi State
measures to
reduce the impact
of droughts and
climate change.
300
600
Timely sharing analysis and
early warnings containing
recommended preventive
measures (awareness) at local,
North-West and North number of timely
East States,
issued alerts
Flood plain areas
Abia State, Benue
12
12
Activity
Locations
Introduce climate-smart
agriculture concepts and
technologies in selected states
in the north
26
Output Indicator
Cluster/
Sector
Partner
All
Nigeria
Activity
STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN
Locations
Output Indicator
Cluster/
Sector
Partner
Mid-2014
target
End-2014
target
6
6
national and regional levels for State, Kogi State
all sectors
Pre-positioning of emergency
food stocks at local, national
and regional levels
North-West and North number of storage All
East States,
sites identified,
Flood plain areas
brought up to
Abia State, Benue
standards and
State, Kogi State
secured
Protect and rehabilitate /
North-West and
strengthen livelihoods of P
North East States,
and VP households through Flood plain areas
the distribution of agricultural Abia State, Benue
inputs where
State, Kogi State
number of
households
assisted in the
main season
All
10000
20000
number of
households
assisted in
irrigated crops
All
10000
20000
Mid-2014
target
End-2014
target
40
80
Joint Humanitarian Priority #2 Malnutrition
Activity
Locations
Output Indicator Cluster/
Sector
Partner
Build capacity of local
government institutions on
programming for food and
nutrition security.
North-West and North Number of local
East States,
government
institutions
practicing
programming for
food and nutrition
security
Joint food security/nutrition
training to promote good
nutritional practices using
appropriate training materials
North-West and North number of people FSWG, Federal 200
East States,
trained
and State ministry
of Health
Promotion of high nutritional North-West and
number of
value vegetable varieties
North East States, household
production
beneficiaries
All
All
15000
400
20000
Joint Humanitarian Priority #5 Disasters (Floods, drought)
Activity
Locations
Output Indicator Cluster/
Sector
Partner
number of
Development of contingency North-West and
plans for natural disasters to North East States, contingency
Flood plain areas
plans made
ensure food security at
Abia State, Benue
All
Mid-2014
target
End-2014
target
1
1
27
STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN
Activity
Locations
Nigeria
Output Indicator Cluster/
Sector
Partner
community , national and
regional levels
Mid-2014
target
End-2014
target
State, Kogi State
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE 3: Deliver coordinated and integrated life-saving assistance
to people affected by emergencies
Joint Humanitarian Priority #1 Food Insecurity
Activity
Locations
Output Indicator
Cluster/
Sector
Partner
Mid-2014
target
Federal and
1000000
Distribution of agricultural inputs North-West and North No of vulnerable
East States,
household able to State ministry of
(vegetable seeds, fertilizers,
produce their own Health
small agricultural tools, irrigation Flood plain areas
Abia State, Benue
food using
l
systems, agricultural material to
State, Kogi State
agricultural inputs
build fences, etc.) to vulnerable
(improved seeds,
households for rehabilitation of
fertilizers, small
agriculture
agricultural tools,
agricultural material
to build fences,
drought resistant
vegetable varieties
etc.) for all-year
round production
No of vulnerable
household
engaged in good Local
agricultural
Government
marketing practices department of
(storage,
agriculture
processing,
packaging )
1000000
End-2014
target
2000000
2000000
Strengthening the food chain
North-West and North percentage
Federal and
50%
and marketing sector (storage, East States,
decrease in
State ministry of
processing and transportation of Flood plain areas
malnutrition and
Health
agricultural goods).
Abia State, Benue
stunting indicators
State, Kogi State
among the
vulnerable
population
80%
Unconditional cash transfers
14000
28
North-West and North number of
CRS, ACF,
East States,
households
IOM, UNICEF
Flood plain areas
receiving
Abia State, Benue
unconditional cash
7000
Nigeria
Activity
Emergency distribution of
agricultural and livestock
inputs
STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN
Locations
Output Indicator
State, Kogi State
transfer
North-West and
North East States,
Flood plain areas
Abia State, Benue
State, Kogi State
number of
households
assisted in the
main season
Cluster/
Sector
Partner
Mid-2014
target
Federal and
200000
State ministry
of Health
End-2014
target
400000
29
STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN
Nigeria
HEALTH
Lead agency: WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION (WHO)
Contact information: Dr Jean Marie Yameogo yameogoj@who.int
PEOPLE IN NEED
2.5 million
PEOPLE TARGETED
1.8 million
REQUIREMENTS (US$)
9.1 millions
# OF PARTNERS
5
In recent years Nigeria has suffered devastating emergencies such as post-election violence in 2011; insurgency;
the floods of 2012 in which serious and extensive damages were recorded, and which were the first of their kind in
Nigeria; environmental disasters of erosion, land slides, lead poisoning and oil spillage in the Niger Delta; the
ocean surge; communal clashes and a current state of emergency in Borno, Yobe and Adamawa states in the
north-east of the country.
Post election violence in 2011 led to the loss of many lives and destruction of properties worth hundreds of millions
across the country. The 2012 floods cost Nigeria over $7 billion in economic terms, affected over seven million
people and displaced more than 2 million people, 597,476 houses were either damaged or destroyed, 363 people
died and much farm land and produce was destroyed4. Approximately 75% of those displaced were women and
children under five years old. Since 2009, increasingly frequent and sophisticated attacks and bombings, attributed
to Boko Haram, have been carried out, and ensuing heavy-handed counter-insurgency operations have caused
death, destruction of property and significant displacement.
Before 2009, most political violence in Nigeria occurred in the south, in the densely populated Niger Delta region
which is home to the country’s oil and gas industry. Fighting between militants and Government forces deployed to
protect oil installations and personnel led to further displacement.
Communal clashes affected almost every part of the country, including the north-west, north-east, north-central and
south-east. Many lives were lost and properties, farm land and produce destroyed. Environmental disaster included
the landslide in the South-South, South-East and lead poisoning in Zamfara state causing loss of life,
environmental damage, impairing health and rendering farmland useless. Ocean surges in Lagos occurred in 2012
and 2013, occasioning loss of life and destruction of property.
Most disaster affected people in Nigeria take shelter in schools, churches, mosques, town halls, and in makeshift
camps and NEMA camps which are grossly inadequate and unsustainable. Host communities accommodating
IDPs mostly become overstretched and overwhelmed. To date there is no standard mechanism or effective system
of distribution of non-food items for IDPs accommodated by host communities who make up the majority; schools
that serve as temporary shelters interrupt pupils’ education. The lead poisoning in Zamfara state that continues to
cause considerable loss of life, endanger health and degrade the environment is caused by the use of cyanide, a
chemical used by artisan miners/illegal miners in mining to separate precious stones from soil and clay particles
and then concentrate the mineral in one chunk. It is a scientific fact that cyanide is a highly hazardous and
4
The Post Disaster Needs Assessment on the 2012 Floods (March 2013)
30
Nigeria
STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN
corrosive poison that kills adults gradually and kills children almost immediately. It is for this reason that many
industrialized countries have banned the use of cyanide in mining.
The health sector will respond to the direct impact of these hazards and will ensure linkage to programmes
addressing malnutrition and epidemics such as cholera and other water borne diseases. In addition, the health
sector will adopt an integrated response that will address diarrheal diseases, inpatient care, essential drugs,
malaria and HIV preparedness and response including prevention of communicable diseases through awareness
raising with communities in high risk (security) areas.
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE 1: Track and analyse risk and vulnerability, integrating
findings into humanitarian and development programming.
Joint Humanitarian Priority #2 addressing the humanitarian impact Natural disasters (floods, etc.)
Activity
Locations
Output Indicator
Cluster/
Sector Partner
Mid-2014
target
End-2014
target
Advocacy on the analysed
vulnerabilities requiring
support
North East, North-West,
North Central, SouthWest, South-South,
South-East
Health
Number of joint
advocacy related to
vulnerability
analysis
.
3
6
Conduct an evaluation of
the response capacities of
the health sector
North East, NorthWest, North Central,
South-West, SouthSouth, South-East
Number of
Health Sector 3
assessment
Federal and
reports of the
State ministry
health sector
of Health
response capacity
taking into
account age,
gender and
disability
6
Joint multi-sectoral
North-East, Northvulnerability analysis taking West, North Central,
into account age, gender
South-West, Southand disability
South, South-East
Number of
Health Sector 5
meetings on the
Federal and
assessment of the
State ministry
health sector
response capacity of Health
taking into
account age,
gender and
disability
10
Mapping and risk analysis
in the health sector
North East, NorthWest, North-Central,
South-west, SouthSouth, South-East
Number of
multisectoral
analysis reports
taking into
account age,
gender and
disability
Health Sector 6
Federal and
State ministry
of Health
6
Strengthen interregional
coordination mechanisms
North East, NorthWest, North Central,
South-West, SouthSouth, South-East
Number of reports Health Sector 1
based on risk
mapping and
analysis in the
2
31
STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN
Activity
Locations
Nigeria
Output Indicator
Cluster/
Sector Partner
Mid-2014
target
End-2014
target
health sector
taking into
account age,
gender and
disability
Joint Humanitarian Priority #4: Addressing the humanitarian impact of Epidemics (cholera, malaria, etc.)
Activity
Locations
Output Indicator
Assess the coverage of
epidemic response
campaigns
North East, North-West,
North-Central, Southwest, South-South,
South-East
Number of children All
who actually
received preventive
intervention
Capacity analysis to
response to epidemics
North East, North-West, supported
North-Central, Southassessments
West, South-South,
South-East
Develop a map of epidemic
risk
North-East, North-West,
contingency plans All
North-Central, Souththat include an
West, South-South,
analysis of the local
South-East
Cluster/
Mid-2014
Sector partner target
End-2014
target
150000
350000
50
100
1
1
Epidemiology
department
Ministry of
Health
2000
2500
Reinforce existing sentinel North East, North-West, Number of cases Epidemology
sites for monitoring potential North-Central, South- detected
department
west, South-South,
epidemic diseases
Ministry of
South-East
Number of projects
Health
which support
communication for
sentinel
surveillance system
2000
2000
2
2
Number of
Health Sector
Number of
and national
capacity to respond
to outbreaks
Reinforce early warning
systems for existing potential
epidemics or diseases in
health facilities and at
community level
.
32
North-East, North-West, Number of cases
North Central, Southdetected
west, South-South,
South-East
Nigeria
STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN
Activity
Locations
Output Indicator
Cluster/
Mid-2014
Sector partner target
End-2014
target
Monitor and evaluate the
response to epidemics
North East, NorthWest, North Central,
South-west, SouthSouth, South-East
Number of
response
objectives that
have been
achieved
Epidemiology 3
department
Ministry of
Health
6
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE 3: Deliver coordinated and integrated life-saving assistance
to people affected by emergencies.
Joint Humanitarian Priority: Addressing the humanitarian impact Natural disasters (floods, etc.)
Activity
Locations
Output Indicator
Baseline
Ensure effective and
efficient coordination of
humanitarian health
activities
North East, NorthWest, North Central,
South-west, SouthSouth, South-East
Number of « Who Health Sector
does What Where »
disseminated to
the public
Number of updated
stakeholders’
Health Sector
contact lists
available per
month
Mid-2014
target
End-2014
target
20
40
100
2000
33
STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN
Nigeria
NUTRITION
Lead agency: UNICEF
Contact information: Stanley Chitekwe schitekwe@unicef.org
PEOPLE IN NEED
PEOPLE TARGETED
REQUIREMENTS (US$)
3.9 million
323,488
2.3 million
# OF PARTNERS
25
Nigeria has the second highest acute malnutrition burden in the world. An estimated 3.78 million children suffer
from wasting. In northern states, the prevalence of wasting ranges from 1.5% in Yobe to 3.7% in Katsina (SMART
nutrition survey, August 2013). This is also the region with the highest child mortality rate and the worst social and
economic indicators. Following release of the National Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) in 2008, showing
very high levels of acute malnutrition in the country, in 2009 UNICEF Nigeria introduced the Community-based
Management of Acute Malnutrition (CMAM) programme. With the onset of the nutrition crisis in the Sahel mainly in
the eight Sahelian states in the north of the country, the UNICEF Nigeria country office has been supporting the
Government in implementing a scaled-up CMAM programme; from a targeted 6,000 children in 2009 the CMAM
raised the bar to support 200,000 children 2012, so as to meet the increasing number of cases of Severe Acute
Malnutrition (SAM). UNICEF, in collaboration with the federal and state Ministries of Health and sector partners
plans to continue strengthening the CMAM interventions to provide effective treatment for children with Severe
Acute Malnutrition (SAM) in eight Sahelian states in the north.
During emergency situations, there is an increased risk of death especially among children under five due to
frequent cases of infection and high rates of malnutrition. The fundamental means of preventing malnutrition and
mortality is to ensure appropriate feeding and care. Children suffering from acute malnutrition have a high risk of
dying, thus management of acute malnutrition during the emergency is an urgent priority. From current estimates,
about 30% of affected people are living in IDP camps (2,152,699) while the others are living with host communities
(5,022,965). Of this number, 30% are estimated to be children under the age of five of whom 87,184 are expected
to be severely malnourished and some 258,324 moderately malnourished. While reports indicated that rainfall
might continue until the end of November, the flood shows no sign of receding. Livelihoods of the displaced have
also been destroyed leaving them devoid of a coping mechanism for the coming year. The state of emergency is
maintained in Borno, Yobe and Adamawa states and security has been one of the major challenges to delivering
routine nutrition programmes. It is imperative to continue providing nutritional services through CMAM to children
with Severe Acute Malnutrition (SAM) in the region, with specific focus to 11 Sahelian states. Recent results from
SMART nutrition surveys indicate that there is a need to continue treating children with SAM in these areas. In
2014 alone, a total of 539,147 cases of SAM are expected to require treatment through CMAM services in the 11
Sahelian states of Adamawa, Bauchi, Borno, Gombe, Jigawa, Kano, Katsina, Kebbi, Sokoto, Yobe and Zamfara.
Continued and strengthened Community Infant and Young Child Feeding (c-IYCF) interventions, principally in the
form of counselling, are planned in 495 PHC/CMAM sites for the promotion of exclusive breast feeding and
complimentary feeding practices. The estimated budget is for procurement of Ready-to-Use Therapeutic Foods
(RUTF), logistics and a nutrition survey for monitoring purposes. The budget is based on 60% of the total estimated
SAM burden (539,147) for the year in eleven Sahelian states, to assist 323,488 children.
34
Nigeria
STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE 1: Track and analyse risk and vulnerability, integrating
findings into humanitarian and development programming
Joint Humanitarian Priority # 1 Malnutrition
Activity
Locations
Output Indicator
Cluster/
Sector
Partner
Nutrition surveys
Sahelian States
Number of
regions covered
by a nutritional
survey and
prevalence’s of
malnutrition (all
forms) in children
less than 5 years
All
Number Of
regions covered
by coverage
surveys
All
Mid-2014
target
End-2014
target
24
24
8
8
Evaluation of real-time
responses (TEN)
Sahelian States
Number Regions
covered by a
real-time
evaluation of the
response
All
2
2
Coordination of nutrition actors
- mapping - information sharing
Sahelian States
Number of
information
reports, mapping
available
Health
4
4
Support and encourage
countries to participate in
global initiatives as SUN,
REACH, AGIR
Sahelian States
presence of
multi-sector
common result
framework for
nutrition and
actions
Strengthening health systems:
diagnostic & priority actions
plan
Sahelian States
Number of health
facility with
adequate and
qualified staffing
and information
system
Health
50
100
Monitoring and evaluation
involving the most vulnerable
Sahelian States
Number state
supported with
effective
Health
8
8
Federal
2
Government
4
35
STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN
Activity
Nigeria
Locations
Output Indicator
Cluster/
Sector
Partner
Mid-2014
target
End-2014
target
mechanisms for
representative
and participatory
input from all
users at all
phases
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE 2: Support vulnerable populations to better cope with
shocks by responding earlier to warning signals, by reducing post-crisis recovery
times and by building capacity of national actors
Joint Humanitarian Priority # 2 Malnutrition / Food insecurity
Activity
Locations
Output Indicator
Cluster/
Sector
Partner
Provision of guidance and
training of health staff and
community health workers in
IMAM / CMAM
Sahelian States
Number of health
staff and
community health
worker trained in
IMAM/CMAM
Federal
Ministry of
Health
1000
2000
Provision of guidance and
training of health staff and
community health workers
Sahelian States
Number of health
staff and
community health
worker trained
Federal
Ministry of
Health
1000
2000
Stock prepositioning (nutrition
and health essential supplies)
and hub management
Sahelian States
Number nutrition
supplies and
essential drugs
prepositioned
Federal
and state
Ministry of
Health
200000
Evidence based advocacy to
support national investment on
nutrition activities
Sahelian states
number of
advocacy
activities
Health
Sector
5
5
Number of health
facility with
adequate and
qualified staffing
and information
system
Federal
and state
Ministry of
Health
15000
20000
Strengthen health facility &
community systems including
data and information
management
Mid-2014
target
End-2014
target
400000
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE 3: Deliver coordinated and integrated life-saving assistance
36
Nigeria
STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN
to people affected by emergencies
Joint Humanitarian Priority # 2 Malnutrition
Activity
Locations
Output Indicator
Cluster/
Sector
Partner
Integrated management of
severe acute malnutrition
Sahel States
Number Children 659 months (Number
boys & girls)
affected by severe
acute malnutrition
admitted for
treatment
Nutrition
161,744
323,488
Micronutrient
supplementation and
deworming
Sahel States
Children under 5
numbers receiving
adequate
micronutrient
supplementation
Nutrition
12469316
24,938,632
Number of children
under 5 years
dewormed
Nutrition
Mid-2014
target
End-2014
target
3879343
7,758,685
Performance and quality
monitoring of nutrition
programmes
Sahel States
number of supported
health centre
providing monthly
monitoring of IMAM
(admissions and
performance
indicators )
Nutrition
248
495
Provide essential nutrition
and health supply to affected
population
Sahel States
Number of
supported health
centres with
adequate stocks of
RUTF (no short-cut
reported)
Nutrition
248
495
37
STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN
Nigeria
SHELTER AND NON FOOD ITEMS
Lead agency: Internation Organization for Migration (IOM)
Contact information: Uche Hilary-Ogbonna uhilaryogbonna@iom.int
PEOPLE IN NEED
PEOPLE TARGETED
REQUIREMENTS (US$)
8 million
1.9 million
4.5 million
# OF PARTNERS
5
Access to portable water in Nigeria is limited to about 58.5% of the population, while access to basic sanitation
and hygiene is limited to 32% (Multi Indicator Cluster Survey 2012). During floods the majority of water facilities are
destroyed thereby reducing access to portable water. In the flood disaster of 2012, according to PDNA reporting,
damage to water facilities was estimated at over $79 billion. The report also highlighted a generalized reduction in
access to water for drinking and domestic use as flood victims had to travel longer distances and spend more time
to collect water following the disaster. Early in 2013, the Nigerian Meteorological Agency Seasonal Rainfall
Prediction (SRP) indicated that high rainfalls leading to flooding are to be expected in some parts of the country.
The 2013 Annual Flood Outlook (AFO) released by the Nigerian Hydrological Services Agency (NIHSA) confirmed
NIMET’s forecast. It expected that the need for WASH will increase with the flood season from June to November
2014.
Insecurity in the states under a state of emergency (SoE) in the north-east has led to population movement to the
neigbouring states and weakened LGAs affected access to WASH services. A September 2013 assessment of
SoE states by the UNCT noted that in Borno State 70% of the respondents reported that water and sanitation
facilities were overstretched as a result of the influx of people from high risk LGAs to low risk LGAs. However, given
the timeframe of the assessment, it was difficult to ascertain the actual figure of the displaced population at
household level. In Yobe state 60% of the respondents reported that access to good water and sanitation in the
LGAs covered by the report is adequate. Adamawa state has a minimum level of contamination in comparison with
other states.
In all the affected areas, per capita availability of water supply in the north-east has decreased to one third of precrisis levels. Frequent power cuts, fuel shortages, production and maintenance of water works along with
infrastructure damages have a direct impact on water supplies in the area. Estimated pre-crisis availability of 75
litres per person per day dropped to an average of 20 litres per person per day. Access to water treatment
chemicals has also become increasingly difficult.
Water utilities establishments in most parts of the affected LGAs were moribund even before the declaration of the
state of emergency. Water is distributed by water trucks but chlorination is not systematically carried out by public
and private water truckers. The non-availability of treatment plants for properly treating and disposing of waste,
further increases the discharge of untreated waste into the environment with a heightened risk of ground and
surface water contamination.
Poor hygiene practices in densely-populated areas and collective shelters (more than one family per household)
are increasing the risk of epidemic disease outbreaks. Children and women in collective shelters are more exposed
to unsanitary conditions, including unsafe drinking water and a lack of water for personal hygiene, placing them at
38
Nigeria
STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN
further risk of water-borne diseases, including diarrhoea and skin diseases, such as scabies. In particular children
and women are more exposed to unsanitary conditions due to lack of toilet facilities. To make matters worse,
displaced persons have been observed using the limited number of toilets in their host communities for bathing and
other washing purposes, not only increasing the demand on the sewer or discharge system, but demonstrating
their overall inability to maintain good hygiene practices. There is also a lack of water for basic needs such as
personal hygiene, menstruation management, washing clothes and flushing toilets.
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE 1: Track and analyse risk and vulnerability, integrating findings
into humanitarian and development programming.
Joint Humanitarian Priority: FLOOD/ CONFLICT
Addressing the humanitarian impact Natural disasters (floods, etc.)
Activity
Locations
Output Indicator
Cluster/
Sector
Partner
Evaluation of shelter and NFI
household needs, in areas with
high potential risk of flooding
North East and South- Number assessed All
South
flood prone areas
Mapping of houses in areas with National
high potential risk of flooding
Number of houses Federal
mapped
Ministry of
Housing
Mapping of relocation areas of
populations in regions at risk of
flooding
National
Number of
relocation sites
mapped
Assessment of shelter
rehabilitation needs for
returnees and non-displaced
vulnerable living in conflicts
zones
South-west, SouthSouth, North Central,
North East
Number Regions All
(admin 2 level)
evaluated
Mid-2014
target
End-2014
target
10
20
500000
1000000
Federal
Ministry of
Housing
15
4
30
6
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE 2: Support vulnerable populations to better cope with shocks by
responding earlier to warning signals, by reducing post-crisis recovery times and by
building capacity of national actors.
Joint Humanitarian Priority: FLOOD/ CONFLICT
Activity
Locations
Pre-positioning of shelter/NFI
Nigeria
contingency stocks in regions at
Output Indicator
Cluster/
Sector
Partner
Number of region SWG
with a contingency
Mid-2014
target
3
End-2014
target
6
39
STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN
Activity
Locations
Nigeria
Output Indicator
Cluster/
Sector
Partner
Mid-2014
target
End-2014
target
risk of flooding.
stock
Training local masons in areas at Nigeria
risk of flooding, on "flood
resistant" construction techniques
Number of masons SWG
trained
100,000
200,000
Distribution of tool kits and
material kits for vulnerable
households in conflict areas
South-west, SouthNumber of
SWG
South, North Central, households
North East
receiving tools and
material kit
100,000
200,000
Capacity building trainings for
Shelter/NFI Sector members
Abuja
Number of persons SWG
trained
15
30
Advocacy & Mobilization:
Nigeria
Sensitization, Information sharing,
Media relations and campaigns
Number of persons SWG
reached
1,500 000
Capacity building trainings for South-west, SouthSouth, North Central,
partners at the sub national
North East
level
Number of
persons trained
SWG
2,500 000
200
300
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE 3: Deliver coordinated and integrated life-saving assistance to
people affected by emergencies
Joint Humanitarian Priority: FLOOD/ CONFLICT
Activity
Locations
Output Indicator
Cluster/
Sector
Partner
Mid-2014
target
End-2014
target
500 000
1,000 000
One time distribution of non-food South-west, SouthSouth, North Central,
items to flood affected
North East
households
Number of
households
receiving NFI
Number of
households
receiving NFI
South-South, North
Construction / rehabilitation of
Central, North East
damaged houses in areas not
prone to flooding or in relocation
areas
Number of houses SWG
built
10,000
20,000
South-west, SouthConstruction/rehabilitation of
housing for vulnerable people in South, North Central,
North East
conflict affected areas whose
homes were damaged; priority to
Number of houses SWG
restored/rebuilt
15,000
30,000
40
SWG
Nigeria
Activity
STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN
Locations
Output Indicator
Cluster/
Sector
Partner
Mid-2014
target
End-2014
target
Distribution of tents for families
affected by flooding
North /Niger Delta
Number of tents
distributed
Number of tents
distributed
SWG
50,000
100,000
Rental support for IDPs
through financial allowance
Nigeria
Number of
SWG
persons assisted
20,000
50,000
women heads of households
41
STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN
Nigeria
PROTECTION
Lead agency: United Nations High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR)
Contact information: Angele Dikongue-Atangana dikongue@unhcr.org
PEOPLE IN NEED
PEOPLE TARGETED
REQUIREMENTS (US$)
9.4 million
500,000
2.7 million
# OF PARTNERS
7
It is estimated that 9.4 million individuals will be affected by conflict and disasters in Nigeria including floods,
recurrent intercommunal clashes and insurgency/counter-insurgency in the three states where the Government
declared a state of emergency. Protection concerns in the context of these complex dynamics include but are not
limited to: threats to life and freedom of movement, forced evictions, violence against women and children, children
affected by armed conflict and arbitrary arrest. The displacement caused by flooding in 2012 helped draw wide
international and national attention to the displacement caused by inter-communal violence and the northern
conflict involving insurgents. While incidents of violence are regularly reported in local and national media, data on
IDPs is patchy. More information is needed on their situation, their overall needs, response to their plight and gaps
in response. In addition, internal displacement in Nigeria is generally addressed as a short-term and humanitarian
issue, with minimal resources dedicated to helping people return, integrate locally or settle elsewhere in the
country. This lack of focus on durable solutions and the absence of countrywide monitoring mean that only limited
information is available on the situation of IDPs beyond the emergency response phase.
The protection situation for civilians in the SoE states is a continued source of concern. Armed clashes between
anti-government elements and the Joint Task Force (JTF) often result in the death of civilians, including children
and women and access to the affected communities is becoming increasingly difficult. This has resulted in the
exact number of civilians (including women and children) affected often not being available. It is therefore critical to
improve monitoring and reporting of human rights violations in the three SoE states to better understand the
situation facing civilians. Armed anti-government elements have also specifically targeted the education system.
Human rights groups have reported that between January and September 2013 up to 50 schools may have been
attacked, burned or destroyed in the north-east and at least 70 teachers and 100 students have been killed or
injured since 2012, causing considerable disruption to education for children in the affected states (Amnesty
International 2013).
Gender-based violence (GBV) continues to be a cause for concern in Nigeria. Data on the extent of GBV is highly
unreliable, due to considerable under reporting of these incidents, especially sexual violence which attracts victim
stigmatisation. According to the Nigerian Demographic and Health Survey (NDHS) conducted in 2008, 28% of
women have experienced physical violence since the age of 15 while 15% of women have experienced this during
the preceding 12 months. During crises, mechanisms for physical and social protection may be weakened or
destroyed. The work of the police, legal assistance, access to health, education, and other social services are often
disrupted and for those who become displaced these services may not be available anymore. Although there is no
specific analysis available on the impact of disasters on GBV prevalence and response in Nigeria, data from other
countries shows that GBV incidents increase and response mechanisms are weakened. Therefore addressing
GBV from the earliest stages of any emergency is a basic lifesaving and protection issue.
It is also expected that with the upcoming elections in 2015 new challenges will emerge and affect the human rights
situation in the country. Political violence is expected to intensify as the political battle to control the Presidency
deepens. Since Nigeria became a democratic nation in 1999, every election has been marred by violence and
accusations of election irregularities. The 2011 elections left more than 800 persons dead after sporadic riots broke
42
Nigeria
STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN
out following the announcement of election results. There are growing worries that the divisions within the ruling
party will lead to more intense political battles for the victory in the 2015 elections.
Interactions with a wide range of stakeholders including actors in the field indicate limited awareness on
humanitarian protection principles leading to gaps in effective protection planning and response. The sector will
therefore work as a matter of priority to advocate for the integration of these principles in humanitarian planning,
assessment and response. Improving the monitoring, reporting and response of human rights violations, especially
as they relate to children in the context of armed conflict, will also be undertaken to better understand the situation
in the north-east and inform an advocacy campaign to reduce these violations. The establishment of such a system
will provide the information necessary to guide programme design for the protection of children. Generated
information will also serve as an early warning for any crisis enabling prompt and relevant programmatic
interventions.
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE 1: Track and analyse risk and vulnerability, integrating
findings into humanitarian and development programming.
Joint Humanitarian Priority #1 Natural disasters
Activity
Locations
Flood affected areas
Mapping and analysing
vulnerability as it relates to
protection in natural disaster
prone communities focusing
on boys, girls and women, in
order to improve response plan Areas prone to
natural disasters
Ensure the integration of the
principles of protection,
including Age, Gender and
Diversity (AGD) in all sectors of
humanitarian planning,
assessment and response.
Output Indicator
Number of
communities
assessed
Cluster/
Sector
Partner
Mid-2014
target
End-2014
target
All sectors
% of sector plans All sectors
which are AGD
100%
sensitive
% of interagency
assessments
conducted which
have a protection
component
integrated
100%
100%
100%
Mid-2014
target
End-2014
target
Joint Humanitarian Priority #2 Conflict
Activity
Locations
Northeast, conflict
Mapping and analysing
affected areas
vulnerability as it relates to
protection of armed conflict prone
communities focusing on boys,
girls, women, in order to improve
response
Output Indicator
Cluster/
Sector
Partner
Number of affected All sectors
communities
(including IDPs and
host communities)
assessed
43
STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN
Nigeria
Activity
Locations
Output Indicator
Development of human/child
rights monitoring and reporting
mechanisms in the situation of
armed conflict
Northeast, conflict
affected areas
Child rights specific PSWG,
monitoring
Health,
mechanism
Justice
developed (y/n)
Cluster/
Sector
Partner
Mid-2014
target
End-2014
target
Yes
Yes
Monitoring and
reporting
mechanism is
operated by trained
human rights actors
(y/n)
Yes
Monthly rights
violations
report/trend
analysis available
for programmatic
use (y/n)
Yes
Support evidence-informed
Northeast, conflict
advocacy using the data
affected areas
generated from the
abovementioned monitoring and
reporting mechanisms in order to
reduce violations.
Number of
PSWG
evidence-informed
specific advocacy
activities carried out
Ensure the integration of the
Northeast, conflict
principles of protection,
affected areas
including Age, Gender and
Diversity (AGD) in all sectors of
humanitarian planning,
assessment and response.
Number of sector All sectors
plans which are
AGD sensitive
Number of
interagency
assessments
conducted which
have a protection
integrated
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE 2: Support vulnerable populations to better cope with
shocks by responding earlier to warning signals, by reducing post-crisis recovery
times and by building capacity of national actors.
Joint Humanitarian Priority #2 Conflict
Activity
Locations
Advocacy and technical support North-East, conflict
affected areas
for improving standards,
procedures, legal framework and
specific policy in the area of IDP
44
Output Indicator
Cluster/
Sector
Partner
Draft Policy adopted PSWG
(y/n)
Number of
Mid-2014
target
End-2014
target
Yes
Nigeria
Activity
STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN
Locations
Output Indicator
Cluster/
Sector
Partner
management
advocacy/awareness
raising workshops
on the IDP legal
framework and draft
policy
In partnership with
North-East, conflict
Governments, communities
affected areas
and development actors,
address the potential root
causes of conflict focusing on
preventive actions and peace
building activities
Number of peace
dialogues
facilitated
Mid-2014
target
End-2014
target
PSWG
Number of trainers
in conflict
resolution and
peace building
trained
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE 3: Deliver coordinated and integrated life-saving assistance
to people affected by emergencies.
Joint Humanitarian Priority #1 Natural Disaster
Activity
Locations
Areas prone to
Advocate for protection
principles being integrated into natural disasters
the delivery of life saving
assistance for disaster-affected
people
Output Indicator
Cluster/
Sector
Partner
Mid-2014
target
End-2014
target
Mid-2014
target
End-2014
target
Number of sector All sectors
plans which are
AGD sensitive
Joint Humanitarian Priority #2 Conflict
Activity
Locations
Output Indicator
Cluster/
Sector
Partner
Advocate for the integration of the North-East, conflict
principles of protection, including affected areas
Age, Gender and Diversity (AGD)
in all sectors of humanitarian
response.
Number of sector
plans which are
AGD sensitive
All sectors
Development of and support for North-East, conflict
age- and gender-responsive case affected areas
management system to support
persons affected by violence,
exploitation and abuse
Number of persons
(disaggregated by
age and gender)
referred to support
services (including
health, social
Health,
education,
livelihood
cluster,
MWASD,
police,
45
STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN
Activity
Locations
Training of health workers and
medical professionals on clinical North-East, conflict
management of sexual violence affected areas
victims
Establishment of Child Friendly
North-East, conflict
Spaces including the provision of
affected areas
psychosocial services for children
Nigeria
Output Indicator
Cluster/
Sector
Partner
welfare and legal
aid)
justice
Curriculum on
Health
clinical
cluster
management of
sexual violence
victims developed
(y/n)
Number of Child
Friendly Spaces
established
Number of children
(disaggregated by
gender and age)
accessing Child
Friendly Spaces
WATER SANITATION AND HYGIENE
46
Education
cluster
Mid-2014
target
End-2014
target
Nigeria
STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN
Lead agency: Ministry of Health and UNICEF
Contact information: Adili Amatontu amatontu@unicef.org
PEOPLE IN NEED
PEOPLE TARGETED
REQUIREMENTS (US$)
4.6 million
2 million
11 million
# OF PARTNERS
5
Access to potable water in Nigeria is about 58.5% while access to basic Sanitation and Hygiene is 32% (Multi
Indicator Cluster Survey 2012). During the flood disaster, the majority of water facilities were destroyed thereby
reducing access to potable water. According to a PDNA report, damage to water facilities in the 2012 flood disaster
was estimated at N12.9 billion. The report also highlighted a general indication of reduced access to water for
drinking and domestic use as flood victims had to travel longer distances and spend more time collecting water
after the disaster.
In early 2013, the Nigerian Meteorological Agency Seasonal Rainfall Prediction (SRP) indicated that high rainfall
leading to flooding was to be expected in some parts of the country. The 2013 Annual Flood Outlook (AFO)
released by the Nigerian Hydrological Services Agency (NIHSA), confirmed NIMET’s forecast. The AFO revealed
that apart from Ekiti, Enugu, Katsina, Imo, Abia States and Federal Capital Territory (FCT), all other states in
Nigeria were likely to experience significant flooding in 2013. With regard to river flooding, the most affected areas
were expected to be in the Komadugu Yobe Basin and the Niger and Benue troughs. In areas affected by the
previous season's floods, poor households are still in the process of recovering their livelihoods. WASH issues are
still very critical in these areas, poor access to clean water, hygiene and sanitation is still very common, making the
affected population susceptible to water-borne diseases like cholera, diarrhoea or malaria.
Lead poisoning and oil pollution in Zamfara State and Niger Delta area respectively are responsible for the
contamination of domestic water sources of the communities around the affected areas. Addressing this also
requires provision of access to clean water as a way of preventing the disaster. Sanitary facilities for affected
people are also impacted. Analysis of the toilet facilities used by the respondents before and after the disaster
showed that the situation worsened as a result of the flood disaster. The survey indicated that in Anambra, Imo,
Kogi, Niger and Jigawa states the proportion of households that used household toilets declined while open
defecation increased. This situation was likely to apply across all the states impacted by the flood.
Furthermore, use of other sanitary facilities such as soap, detergents, water and sanitary napkins became
inadequate in the aftermath of the disaster. There is a continued need for humanitarian assistance to those
displaced by the floods, as well as those populations whose access to safe water and sanitation services was
reduced by the effects of flooding in their communities. Beyond the humanitarian relief and preparedness
responses, there is a need for sustainable intervention putting in place flood mitigation measures which will include
building of organizational capacity and coordination for early warning and response. Such flood mitigation
measures will include construction of flood-proof water sources and catchment treatments on micro water shed
basis.
Cumulatively from weeks 1-48, 2013, at least 4,390 suspected cholera cases were reported with 151 deaths from
18 LGAs. A priority is to strengthen the cholera monitoring and response mechanisms primarily through the FMoH
and FMoWR. Strategies would include provision of water quality testing kits and training for SMoHs and
RUWASAs to plan, implement and sustain a coherent water quality testing regime and to build capacity to respond
early to contain outbreaks. Improvement in water quality, latrine coverage and hygiene behaviour are essential
47
STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN
Nigeria
components of cholera response and such activities would use schools and health facilities as entry points to the
wider community where water treatment at household level would be a focus area.
According to WHO, nutritional status is compromised where people are exposed to high levels of infection due to
unsafe and insufficient water supply and inadequate sanitation. In secondary malnutrition, people suffering from
diarrhoea will not benefit fully from food because frequent stools prevent adequate absorption of nutrients.
Moreover, those who are already experiencing protein-energy malnutrition are more susceptible to, and less able to
recover from, infectious diseases. Nigeria has the second highest acute malnutrition burden in the world.
Malnutrition is a major health problem, especially in the 8 Sahelian states of northern Nigeria where about 367,000
children were reached through the Community-based Management of Acute Malnutrition (CMAM) programme as of
November 2013. Natural disasters and conflicts, by damaging water infrastructure and contaminating supplies,
contribute to increased malnutrition and an increased risk of death especially among children under five due to
frequent cases of infection and high rates of malnutrition.
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE 1: Track and analyse risk and vulnerability, integrating findings
into humanitarian and development programming
Joint Humanitarian Priority #1 – Natural disasters
Activity
Locations
Output Indicator
Cluster/
Sector
Partner
Mid-2014
target
End-2014
target
Support to national authorities 6 geo-political zones
for data collection and analysis
on access to water and
sanitation
Number of areas with All
humanitarian
organizations'
operations with
available data on
access to water and
sanitation, is
available
200
500
Promoting the creation of local Affected Areas
water commission or other
consultative bodies including
the most vulnerable users
Number of
All
consultative bodies
(local water
commission or
committee, etc.)
created that include
the most vulnerable
users at the decisionmaking level
(potentially from
project steering
committees,
maintenance
committees, etc.)
99
99
Identification and mapping of 6 geo-political
areas at risk for disasters
zones
(floods in the first place )
Number Of areas
All
covered by
floodplain mapping
available
6
6
Joint Humanitarian Priority #2 – Malnutrition
48
Nigeria
STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN
Activity
Locations
Output Indicator
Cluster/
Sector
Partner
Mid-2014
target
End-2014
target
Support to national authorities 6 Geo-political zones
for data collection and analysis
on access to water and
sanitation
Number of areas with All
humanitarian
organizations'
operations with
available data on
access to water and
sanitation, is
available
2
Identification of areas and the
most vulnerable population to
malnutrition, and joint analysis
WASH/ malnutrition /
aggravating factors link to the
WASH sector (diarrhea)
Number of areas with All
joint analysis
focusing on
population most at
risk of malnutrition for
which WASH actions
can be conducted as
a priority
14
20
Integration of hygiene
promotion in key family
practices in school curricula
Number of schools
integrating hygiene
and sanitation
promotion in their
curricula
2500
3000
All
6
Joint Humanitarian Priority #3 - Conflict
Activity
Locations
Mid-2014
target
End-2014 target
Number of areas with WASH
humanitarian
organizations'
operations with
available data on
access to water and
sanitation, is
available
2
6
Promoting the creation Affected Areas Number of
WASH
of local water
consultative bodies
commission or other
(local water
consultative bodies
commission or
including the most
committee, etc.)
vulnerable users
created that include
the most vulnerable
users at the
decision-making
level (potentially
from project
steering
committees,
maintenance
committees, etc.)
5
10
Support to national
6 Geo-political
authorities for data
zones
collection and analysis on
access to water and
sanitation
Output Indicator
Cluster
Sector/
Partner
49
STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN
Nigeria
Joint Humanitarian Priority #4 – Epidemics
Activity
Locations
Output Indicator
Cluster/
Sector
Partner
Mid-2014
target
End-2014
target
Support to national authorities 6 Geo-political zones
for data collection and analysis
on access to water and
sanitation
Number of areas with All
humanitarian
organizations'
operations with
available data on
access to water and
sanitation, is
available
2
6
Capitalisation / lessons learned Affected Areas
with local and / or national
Number of areas
covered by a
capitalization/lessons
learned exercise
organized with local
and / or national
authorities
All
6
12
Identification and mapping of
areas , populations, behaviours
and high risk period for cholera
transmission
Number areas with
joint WASH/Health
analysis targeting the
population most atrisk of cholera, for
which priority WASH
actions can be
conducted
All
10
20
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE 2: Support vulnerable populations to better cope with shocks by
responding earlier to warning signals, by reducing post-crisis recovery times and by building
capacity of national actors
Joint Humanitarian Priority #1 – Natural Disasters
Activity
Locations
Output Indicator
Cluster/
Sector
Partner
Mid-2014
target
End-2014
target
Taking into consideration
access to water and sanitation
during site planning
Number of planned
All
reception sites identified
in the contingency plan
explicitly taking account
of access to water
resources and sanitation
1000
2000
Flooding contingency plan,
including rapid response
capabilities WASH ( HR
inputs , seasonal
reinforcement)
Number of agencies
All
involved in the
development of a
multisectoral
contingency plan that is
200
200
50
Nigeria
Activity
STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN
Locations
Output Indicator
Cluster/
Sector
Partner
Mid-2014
target
End-2014
target
Cluster/
Sector
Partner
Mid-2014
target
End-2014
target
4000
6000
regularly updated and
that includes simulation
exercise
Joint Humanitarian Priority #3 - Conflict
Activity
Locations
Output Indicator
For communities and the most
vulnerable groups, systematize
the key steps in "participatory
decision " in humanitarian or
development projects
Number of people All
benefited from a
project's key
milestones of
"participatory
decision-making" of
communities and
the most vulnerable
groups
Contingency plan , including
rapid response capabilities
WASH ( HR inputs)
Number of
All
agencies involved
in the development
of a multisectoral
contingency plan
that is regularly
updated and that
includes simulation
exercise
Rehabilitation of access to
WASH services (schools , health
centres ) in areas of return
Number of schools All
with functional
WASH services in
the areas of return
Number of health
centres with
functional WASH
services in the
areas of return
2000
4000
Output Indicator
Mid-2014
target
End-2014
target
200
200
Joint Humanitarian Priority #4 - Epidemics
Activity
Contingency plan for the fight
against cholera / malaria ,
including rapid response
capabilities WASH / Health (RH ,
inputs , seasonal reinforcement)
Locations
Cluster/
Sector
Partner
Number of
All
agencies involved
in the development
of a multisectoral
contingency plan
that is regularly
updated and that
includes simulation
200
200
51
STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN
Activity
Locations
Nigeria
Output Indicator
Cluster/
Sector
Partner
Mid-2014
target
End-2014
target
100
200
exercise
Sustainable WASH strategies in
urban and rural areas at risk for
cholera
Number of cholera All
high-risk areas
where sustainable
WASH strategies
are put in place to
protect vulnerable
populations
Addressing the humanitarian impact
of Food insecurity
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE 3: Deliver coordinated and integrated life-saving assistance to
people affected by emergencies.
Joint Humanitarian Priority # 1 – Natural Disasters
Activity
Locations
Output Indicator
Consult women and girls at all
stages of the project. Have
special attention with regard to
the design and location of water
points, showers and toilets to
reduce the waiting time and
incidents of violence. Ensure that
the evaluation teams and
translation include female staff.
Number of women
spending less than 20
minutes to collect
water/queuing
Create hygiene promotion
activities targeting both women
AND men.
Cluster/
Sector
Partner
All
Mid-2014
target
End-2014
target
10000
20000
Number of girls
spending less than 20
minutes to collect
water/queuing
All
5000
10000
Number of boys
spending less than 20
minutes to collect
water/queuing
All
2000
4000
Number of women
having improved
knowledge on water
and hygiene related
diseases
All
20000
40000
10000
20000
50
50
All
Number of men having
improved knowledge on
water and hygiene
related diseases
Establish mechanism for
monitoring and evaluation of
cluster/sector group
performance its interaction with
52
Number of WASH
cluster members
satisfied with the
functioning of the
WASH Cluster and its
All
Nigeria
Activity
STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN
Locations
Output Indicator
Cluster/
Sector
Partner
Mid-2014
target
End-2014
target
other sectors
interaction with the
other Clusters/Sectors
in the preparedness for
and response to crises
Access to water and sanitation
programmes for the affected
populations at community level
Number of affected
All
population with access
to safe drinking water
(Global WASH Cluster
W 2-4)
1m
2m
WASH functional package of
activities in displacement sites
Number girls using
All
minimum functional
WASH package (water
drunk drinking ,
culturally appropriate
safe hygienic
defecation with
separation type , key
inputs with hygiene
promotion )
All
Number boys using
minimum functional
WASH package (water
drunk drinking ,
culturally appropriate
safe hygienic
defecation with
separation type , key
inputs with hygiene
promotion )
10000
20000
50000
100000
Output Indicator
Mid-2014
target
End-2014
target
Joint Humanitarian Priority # 3 - Conflict
Activity
Locations
Cluster/
Sector
Partner
Monitoring and evaluation on
functionality of WASH package
(residual chlorine, VIP latrines
etc.) involving the most
vulnerable
Number of people who All
have benefited from a
project involving the
most vulnerable people
in the monitoring and
evaluation of the
functionality of a WASH
package (residual
chlorine, VIP latrines
etc.)
1m
2m
Create hygiene promotion
activities targeting both women
AND men.
Number of women
having improved
knowledge on water
and hygiene related
diseases
12
24
WASH
53
STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN
Activity
Mid-2014
target
End-2014
target
Number of men having WASH
improved knowledge on
water and hygiene
related diseases
12
24
Construction of sanitation
facilities in emergency affected
communities
Number of affected
WASH
population
(disaggregated by sex
and age) using sanitary
latrines
5000
10000
“Safe access to drinking water"
activities in WASH programmes
in displacement sites
Number of drinking
WASH
water sources with safe
access
150
300
Functional package WASH in
displacement sites, host
communities / villages (drinking
water, culturally appropriated
hygienic defecation with safe
gender separation, key inputs
with hygiene promotion)
Number girls using
WASH
minimum functional
WASH package (water
drunk drinking ,
culturally appropriate
safe hygienic defecation
with separation type ,
key inputs with hygiene
promotion)
300,000
500,000
Number boys using
WASH
minimum functional
WASH package (water
drunk drinking ,
culturally appropriate
safe hygienic defecation
with separation type ,
key inputs with hygiene
promotion)
200,000
400,000
Number women using WASH
minimum functional
WASH package (water
drunk drinking ,
culturally appropriate
safe hygienic defecation
with separation type ,
key inputs with hygiene
promotion)
350,000
700,000
Number men using
WASH
minimum functional
WASH package (water
drunk drinking ,
culturally appropriate
safe hygienic defecation
170,000
340,000
54
Locations
Nigeria
Output Indicator
Cluster/
Sector
Partner
Nigeria
Activity
STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN
Locations
Output Indicator
Cluster/
Sector
Partner
Mid-2014
target
End-2014
target
Number of women
satisfied with their
access to services,
facilities, water and
sanitation made
WASH
250,000
500,000
Number of men
satisfied with their
access to services,
facilities, water and
sanitation made
WASH
150,000
300,000
Output Indicator
Cluster/Sector Mid-2014 End-2014
Partner
target
target
with separation type ,
key inputs with hygiene
promotion)
Train women and men in the
areas of building,
operationalization and
maintenance of all types of
water and sanitation facilities:
including wells, pumps, water
tanks, distribution systems,
toilets and showers.
Joint Humanitarian Priority # 4 - Epidemics
Activity
Locations
Monitoring and evaluation on
functionality of WASH package
(residual chlorine, VIP latrines
etc.) involving the most
vulnerable
Number of people who WASH
have benefited from a
project involving the
most vulnerable people
in the monitoring and
evaluation of the
functionality of a WASH
package (residual
chlorine, VIP latrines
etc.)
6
12
Create hygiene promotion
activities targeting both women
AND men.
Number of women
having improved
knowledge on water
and hygiene related
diseases
WASH
20
50
WASH
1
2
Number of men having
improved knowledge on
water and hygiene
related diseases
Establish mechanism for
monitoring and evaluation of
cluster/sector group
performance its interaction with
Number of WASH
cluster members
satisfied with the
functioning of the
WASH Cluster and its
55
STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN
Activity
Locations
Nigeria
Output Indicator
Cluster/Sector Mid-2014 End-2014
Partner
target
target
other sectors
interaction with the
other Clusters/Sectors
in the preparedness for
and response to crises
In collaboration with
healthcare stakeholders ,
gathering, investigation and
analysis of
WASH/epidemiology data
supporting WASH response
orientation
Number of areas
WASH
where, since from the
outbreak beginning of
the epidemic,
epidemiological data
on cholera is analysed
and used to guide the
response of WASH
actors
56
24
40
Nigeria
STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN
ANNEX: FINANCEMENT REQUIS
Table I: Requirements per cluster
Strategic Response Plan for Nigeria 2014
as of 31 January 2014
Requirements
($)
Cluster
COORDINATION AND SUPPORT SERVICES
8,078,433
EARLY RECOVERY
8,050,000
EDUCATION
6,580,361
EMERGENCY SHELTER AND NFI
4,500,000
FOOD SECURITY
10,683,159
HEALTH
19,944,745
NUTRITION
2,333,666
PROTECTION
2,752,831
WATER AND SANITATION
11,937,502
Grand Total
74,860,697
Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by appealing organizations.
Table II: Requirements per priority level
Strategic Response Plan for Nigeria 2014
as of 31 January 2014
Priority
High
Medium
Grand Total
Requirements
($)
70,134,199
2,950,000
73,084,199
Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by appealing organizations.
57
STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN
Nigeria
Table III: Requirements per organization
Strategic Response Plan for Nigeria 2014
as of 31 January 2014
Appealing Organization
ACF - USA
1,083,026
CCFN
6,696,745
FAO
2,650,000
IOM
9,900,000
IRC
5,130,243
OCHA
1,354,834
OXFAM Netherlands (NOVIB)
7,108,060
UNDP
8,050,000
UNFPA
4,212,498
UNICEF
24,033,126
WANEP-Nigeria
200,000
WaterAid
1,692,165
WHO
2,750,000
Grand Total
Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by appealing organizations.
58
Requirements
($)
74,860,697
Nigeria
STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN
Table IV: List of Appeal projects (grouped by cluster)
Strategic Response Plan for Nigeria 2014
as of 31 January 2014
Project code
Title
(click on hyperlinked
project code to open full
project details)
Appealing
agency
Requirements
($)
Priority
COORDINATION AND SUPPORT SERVICES
Capacity Development and support for linking
NGA-14/CSS/66393/5362 States and local NGOs/CSOs for Sub-National
Humanitarian Coordination
OXFAM
Netherlands
(NOVIB)
1,123,599 High
1,354,834 High
NGA-14/CSS/66743/119
Humanitarian Coordination and Advocacy in
Nigeria
OCHA
NGA14/CSS/66910/16502
Early warning/ information management system
for humanitarian response in Nigeria.
WANEPNigeria
NGA-14/CSS/67241/298
Strengthening Camp Coordination and Camp
Management (CCCM) Framework for IDPs in
Nigeria
IOM
Sub total for COORDINATION AND SUPPORT SERVICES
200,000 High
5,400,000 High
8,078,433
EARLY RECOVERY
NGA-14/ER/66902/776
Strengthening Disaster Risk Management and
Recovery in Nigeria
UNDP
5,100,000 High
NGA-14/ER/67193/776
Livelihood and Early Recovery Interventions for
population affected by conflict in in North Easter
Nigeria
UNDP
2,950,000 Medium
Sub total for EARLY RECOVERY
8,050,000
EDUCATION
NGA-14/E/66968/124
Education intervention on access and continued
schooling for children and adolescents in
Emergency- proned Nigerian communities.
UNICEF
Sub total for EDUCATION
6,580,361 High
6,580,361
EMERGENCY SHELTER AND NFI
NGA-14/S-NF/65657/298
Protection and Emergency Assistance to IDPs in
Nigeria
IOM
Sub total for EMERGENCY SHELTER AND NFI
4,500,000 High
4,500,000
FOOD SECURITY
NGA-14/A/65857/5362
Emergency Food Security and Livelihood
intervention for Nigerian communities in the Sahel
Region
OXFAM
Netherlands
(NOVIB)
NGA-14/A/66275/14005
Emergency Food Security and livelihoods program
for the most vulnerable population affected by
ACF - USA
insurgency in Yobe State, Northern Nigeria
1,083,026 High
NGA-14/A/66362/16475
Enhancing Food Security in Northern Nigeria
CCFN
2,742,170 High
NGA-14/A/67024/123
Promotion of Food-based interventons to improve
diet quality to overcome and prevent malnutrition
and nutritional deficiencies especially in children.
FAO
4,207,963 High
850,000 High
59
STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN
Project code
Nigeria
Title
(click on hyperlinked
project code to open full
project details)
NGA-14/A/67029/123
Introducing Conservationn Agriculture techniques
and use of high yielding drought resistant crop
varieties to farming communities.
Appealing
agency
FAO
Sub total for FOOD SECURITY
Requirements
($)
Priority
1,800,000 High
10,683,159
HEALTH
NGA-14/H/65992/1171
Building Resilience of Northern States Bordering
the Sahelian Countries
UNFPA
4,212,498 High
NGA-14/H/66368/124
Emergency Primary Health Care Convergence
intervention (Health, Nutrition and WASH water
and sanitation) for Sahelian northern states in
Nigeria
UNICEF
12,982,247 High
NGA-14/H/67011/122
Reinforcing preparedness and emergency
response to epidemic-prone diseases(Cholera and WHO
Lassa fever) in high risk states of Nigeria.
1,205,000 High
NGA-14/H/67091/122
Nutritional sentinel surveillance in Sahelian states
of Nigeria to monitor the humanitarian impact of
malnutrition among children under-five
1,545,000 High
WHO
Sub total for HEALTH
19,944,745
NUTRITION
NGA-14/H/66113/5179
Emergency Nutrition and Health Services for
Conflict Affected Persons in Adamawa State
IRC
Sub total for NUTRITION
2,333,666 High
2,333,666
PROTECTION
NGA-14/P-HRRL/66104/5179
Emergency protection monitoring and training for
conflict-affected communities in northern
Adamawa State
NGA-14/P-HRRL/66898/124
Strengthening and expanding the monitoring,
reporting & response on children’s rights violations UNICEF
in conflict in Northern Nigeria
IRC
Sub total for PROTECTION
1,383,231 High
1,369,600 High
2,752,831
WATER AND SANITATION
NGA-14/WS/65881/5362
Emergency WASH intervention for food insecure
Nigerian communities in the Sahel Region
OXFAM
Netherlands
(NOVIB)
1,776,498 High
NGA-14/WS/66109/5179
Provision of WASH activities, services and
facilities for conflict-affected persons in northern
Adamawa State
IRC
1,413,346 High
NGA-14/WS/66803/14538
Provision of WASH facilities for conflict and flood
WaterAid
prone areas in Bauchi, Plateau, Benue and Jigawa
1,692,165 High
NGA-14/WS/66889/124
Cholera Preparedness and Response
3,100,918 High
NGA-14/WS/66924/16475
Promoting WASH Intervention in 4 Sahelian State
CCFN
in North Western Nigeria
UNICEF
3,954,575 High
Sub total for WATER AND SANITATION
11,937,502
Grand Total
74,860,697
Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by appealing organizations.
60
Nigeria
STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN
Table V: Requirements per gender marker score
Strategic Response Plan for Nigeria 2014
as of 31 January 2014
Gender marker
Requirements
($)
2a-The project is designed to contribute significantly to gender equality
74,860,697
Grand Total
74,860,697
Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by appealing organizations.
61
Download