FINAL DRAFT – FINALISED DOCUMENT AVAILABLE SOON 2014-2016 STRATEGIC Response Plan Nigeria January 2014 Prepared by OCHA The boundaries and names shown and the designations used in this document do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the Humanitarian Country Team. STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN Nigeria SUMMARY STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES 1. Track and analyse risk and vulnerability, integrating findings into humanitarian and development programming. 2. Support vulnerable populations to better cope with shocks by responding earlier to warning signals, by reducing post-crisis recovery times and by building capacity of national actors. 3. Deliver coordinated and integrated life-saving assistance to people affected by emergencies. PRIORITY ACTIONS PERIOD: January 2014 – December 2016 100% 170 million: Total population (annual growth rate of 2.5% with 140 million recorded in census of 2006) 9.5 million: Estimated number of people affected by conflict and natural disaster 5.5% 8.3 million of total population People in need 4.8% 8.3 million of total population People targeted for humanitarian assistance in this plan 4.8% 7.2 million of total population Key categories of people in need: 3.9 million undernourished people 4.2 million food insecure people (North eastern Nigeria) 194,859 Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs) Source: UNCIEF, NEMA, UNCT assessment 75 million requested by UN and NGOs humanitarian actors 2 PARAMETERS OF THE RESPONSE of total population From sahelian states and northern Nigeria targeted for humanitarian assistance in this plan 4.2% Improve access to protection and assistance to civilians in conflict areas, including for the internally displaced. Provide essential primary and secondary health services (preventive and curative) by addressing chronic diseases, reproductive health, infant and child health and treatment and prevention of acute malnutrition. Increase monitoring of early warning and early detection of possible outbreaks of communicable diseases. Initiate of an effective response for disease control. Intervene where necessary to promote livelihoods, rehabilitate damaged infrastructures and supportincome generating activities, to provide immediate economic relief to affected populations in rural and urban areas. While the Humanitarian Needs Overview (HNO) comprised a countrywide assessment of needs, the Strategic Response Plan (SRP) has prioritized response mainly in northern Nigeria. The prioritization of response in this part of the country is due mainly to the prevalence of critical humanitarian challenges in the region as a result of lingering malnutrition affecting half a million children and the impact of armed confrontation between militant insurgent groups and the Nigerian army, which has left close to 6 million people food insecure. A total of 9.5 million people are currently affected by conflict and natural disaster in Nigeria. Humanitarian partners have targeted 8.3 million people for humanitarian assistance. Of the amount targeted, 7.2 million are from the 8 sahelian states and an additional 3 states in northern Nigeria which face similar humanitarian challenges to the sahelian states. An estimated 4.2 million people in three states in the north-east of the country declared by the Government to be under a state of emergency (SoE) will be targeted for assistance, while 323,488 severe acute malnourished children under the age of five will be treated in eleven Nigeria STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN northern states1. The Strategic Response Plan (SRP) has been developed through joint planning and consultation between the National Emergency Management Agency (NEMA); nine humanitarian sectors co-led by Government line ministries and United Nations agencies; non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and six sub-national geopolitical zones representing Nigeria’s 36 states. Given the population and size of the country, data collection is a resource-demanding task. Continuous data collection has been prioritized by humanitarian actors across the country on an on-going basis. As new information emerges from these assessments data collection efforts the Humanitarian Needs Overview (HNO) will be updated accordingly. However, information on food security and on planning for internally displaced persons (IDPs), has not been readily available; hence the immediate need to elicit relevant information in these sectors for effective planning and response. Of the total population of 9.5 million, 8.3 million will be targeted for response on the basis of figures received from the Government, the UN and NGOs. According to the National Emergency Management Agency (NEMA) about 124,859 people displaced as a result of flooding following rains between June and August 2013 remained displaced at the end of 2013. According to the NEMA update of December 2013, the Local Government Areas (LGA) in a state of emergency which have been most affected by the insurgency are Metropolitan Maiduguri, Kaga, Goza, Bama, Dambua, Baga in Kukawa, Marte, Gubiyo, Abadam (Malam Fatori), Damsac, Mungunu, Ngalia and Konduga in Borno state; Damaturu, Yadin Buni, Gujuba, Potiskum, Fika, Gashua, Gaidam and Fune in Yobe state and Mubi, Ganye and Song in Adamawa state. An estimated 4,732,802 people count amongst the worst affected in SoE areas. According to the latest UN country team (UNCT) assessment of SoE states, 5,972,760 million people have been affected by the insurgency in Borno, Adamawa and Yobe states. This includes 27 LGAs in Borno state, 6 LGAs in Adamawa state (Mubi North, Yola North, Yola South, Girei, Numan, and Mayo Belwa) and 5 LGAs in Yobe state (Damaturu, Potiskum, Geidem, Fune, Gujba). According to OCHA monitoring reports, 70,000 people were displaced from Taraba, Benue, Nasarawa, Kaduna, Kogi and Plateau states as a result of intercommunal conflict. PRIORITY HUMANITARIAN NEEDS 1 Protection of civilians 2 Provision of life saving assistance 3 Improved humanitarian access 4 Better preparedness 5 Building resilience Full HNO: http://wca.humanitarianresponse.info UNICEF has projected that 1,790,920 people are likely to be malnourished in 2014 in 11 northern states. This figure includes 539,147 children under five who are expected to suffer from severe acute malnutrition (SAM) while 1,251,773 people are predicted to suffer from moderate acute malnutrition (MAM) in 11 states in 2014. 90,823 of children under the age of five are expected to suffer from Severe Acute Malnutrition (SAM) are in Borno, Yobe and Adamawa. Epidemic-prone diseases such as measles, meningitis, cholera and Lassa fever occur as recurrent outbreaks. In 2013, a total of 53,023 confirmed measles cases and 2,771 deaths were reported in 753 LGAs in the 36 states and in the Federal Capital Territory; as many as 6,600 suspected cases of cholera with 229 deaths were reported in 94 LGAs in 20 states; 1,195 suspected Lassa fever cases and 39 deaths were reported in 14 states (27 LGAs) and 871 suspected cerebrospinal meningitis cases with 47 deaths in 28 states over the same period. CONTENTS Summary....................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Contents ........................................................................................................................................................................ 3 1 Adamawa, Bauchi, Borno, Gombe, Jigawa, Kano, Katsina, Kebbi, Sokoto, Yobe and Zamfara 3 STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN Nigeria Strategy......................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Strategic objectives and indicators ............................................................................................................................... 9 Cluster plans ...............................................................................................................................................................13 COORDINATION ...................................................................................................................................................................... 14 EDUCATION ............................................................................................................................................................................. 16 FOOD SECURITY ...................................................................................................................................................23 HEALTH.................................................................................................................................................................................... 30 NUTRITION .............................................................................................................................................................................. 34 SHELTER AND NON FOOD ITEMS......................................................................................................................................... 38 PROTECTION .......................................................................................................................................................................... 42 WATER SANITATION AND HYGIENE ..................................................................................................................................... 46 ANNEX: Financement Requis ....................................................................................................................................57 4 Nigeria STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN 5 STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN Nigeria STRATEGY People in need and targeted Since 2012, the UN, INGOs and the Government have carried out assessments in various locations in order to ascertain the extent of needs occasioned by disasters. . The joint UN and Government assessments highlighted the needs of over 2.1 million and 124,859 people affected by flooding in 2012 and 2013 respectively. The prioritization analysis conducted in 2013 for the (HNO helped the humanitarian community to further define its targeting per sector. The sectors took into account capacity of partners and government-planned responses, which they plan to complement. The sectors are targeting assistance as follows: coordination 8.3 million people, education 600,000 people, food security and agriculture 1 million people; health 1.8 million, nutrition 323,488, shelter 2.5 million, protection 500,000 and water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) 2 million. Figure 1: Number of people in need Category Female Male 194,859 IDPs Food Insecure (northern Nigeria) TOTAL 2,008,030 Malnourished TOTAL 2,818,620 4,189,650 3.900,920 8.375,429 Source: UNICEF, NEMA, OCHA Planning assumptions As stated in the HNO, insurgency in the north-east, inter-communal conflict in the north, malnutrition and food insecurity in the Sahel region, election violence, epidemics (cholera) and flooding, will all continue to threaten the lives and livelihoods of the population of Nigeria in 2014. In developing the planning assumptions for 2014, the SRP critically analysed the likely scenarios that would play out based on the dynamics and complexities of the various humanitarian challenges that are being addressed. The aftermath of insurgency and the subsequent declaration of a state of emergency in the three northern states of Borno, Yobe and Adamawa in 2013 will likely continue to disrupt markets, impact household farming and livelihood activities and cause displacement in 2014. In addition, the 6-month extension of the state of emergency (November-May 2014) and the unabated killings and heightened insecurity, may continue to narrow the humanitarian space while food insecurity, which is currently projected at Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) Phase 32 from January to March 2014, will further deteriorate throughout the extension period. Also, poor households affected by this conflict may rely on sales of productive assets, such as livestock, farmland and farm tools in order to meet their basic food consumption needs. In addition, households that are still recovering from the impact of the floods in 2012 and those recovering from the disrupted harvest due to prolonged dryness in northern, central and north-western zones are likely to continue to meet basic food consumption needs with a tight margin. Long-term solutions are essential if displaced and other vulnerable people are to rebuild their lives. Although the Government at national and sub-national levels has continued to provide some support to reduce the extent of food insecurity among the most vulnerable, much more has to be done to improve targeting through better 2 6 IPC refers to Integrated Food Security Phase Classification system Nigeria STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN identification of vulnerable groups, more accurate estimates of the level and type of support needed and overall preparedness for emergencies. It is important to ensure that relevant programmes are put in place and sufficiently supported to reduce vulnerabilities and chronic malnutrition, through better response planning and programming, including institutionalizing safety-net programmes for the most vulnerable and the food insecure. Financial support will be key to speeding up implementation of programmes. Figure 2: Number of people targeted Category Female Male IDPs 111069 83,789 194,859 Food Insecure 570,000 430,000 1.,000,000 Education 258,000 34,200 600,000 Malnourished 184,388 139,099 1,026,000 774,000 1.800.000 285,000 215,000 500,000 WASH 1,140,000 860,000 2,000.000 Shelter and NFI 1,115,536 841,548 1,957082 TOTAL 4,773,993 3,601,436 8,375,429 Health Protection TOTAL 323,488 Source: Nigeria HNO, December 2013 Strategy Strategic objectives have been designed on the basis of consultation at international, national and sub-national, government and non-government level, to address priority needs and ensure multi-sectoral response in line with each objective.The present objectives are aligned with priority categories set out by the Government and the humanitarian country team in Nigeria. The SRP is designed to complement government programmes and meet the needs of disaster-affected people in the areas of livelihood recovery, food security and agriculture, sanitation, hygiene, health, and education. Protection issues will remain a key concern until the Government lifts the state of emergency declared in the north-eastern states. Following the 2012 flooding, the Government developed a comprehensive Post Disaster Needs Assessment (PDNA) aimed at ensuring recovery and rehabilitation. Though the PDNA has not been implemented, it presents a comprehensive picture of the damage and residual needs of the population affected by the floods. In developing the SRP, the Government and humanitarian community agreed to factor in the PDNA, to cover residual humanitarian needs and to support resilience and recovery. In addition, it was agreed that the SRP should be guided by the following criteria: 1. Each project can realistically be implemented by the organization concerned, with reasonable scale-up where necessary. 2. Projects target the most vulnerable groups according to vulnerability criteria. This is to be achieved by each sector continuously collecting, analysing and applying sex- and age-disaggregated data.Establish evidence based needs specific to the location and caseload of each project to be addressed. 3. Projects strengthen the resilience of people and systems to mitigate shocks in the longer term. 7 STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN Nigeria 4. Develop mechanisms which national and local government can continue using independently of international players. Scope of the strategy The 2014 plan seeks to meet the “strategic needs” of a population spanning six geo-political zones in Nigeria: North-West, North-East, North-Central, South-South, South-East and South-West. This is predicated on the complexity and dynamics of a humanitarian crisis that cuts across different regions. However, the SRP will pay particular attention to the north considering the extent of humanitarian challenges identified from 2010 to 2013, which are likely to persist due mainly to the declaration of a state of emergency and the on-going malnutrition crisis. This SRP covers 24 months and clearly identifies areas where the Government and international partners can cooperate to achieve sustainable improvements in living conditions and livelihoods for the most vulnerable members of the population. Priorities within the scope of the strategy The projects in the SRP are designed around the five humanitarian priorities identified at regional level, that is, food insecurity, malnutrition, conflict, epidemics and natural disaster. In setting these strategic priorities and especially in selecting projects, the Government and the humanitarian country team agreed to the following: Project selection guidance The appealing organization and its implementing partners should have the capacity to implement the 1 project. 2 The appealing organization should be a member of the sector. 3 The project will align with the HNO and must meet the needs of the affected population. 4 The project should contribute to one or more sector strategic objectives. 5 The project should fall within the list of prioritized locations for the sectors or with justification accepted. The project should have a clear target population, planned outputs, expected outcomes and 6 performance indictors. The project should identify and respond to the distinct needs of women, girls, boys and men, or justify 7 its focus on one group. 8 The project should not duplicate activities implemented by other organisations. 9 The project activities should be feasible within the 12 month timeframe of the plan. The project should be cost-effective in terms of the number of affected people assisted and the needs 10 to which the project responds. The generic project selection criteria above were provided for sector coordinators to use in addition to the sector specific criteria. The criteria reinforced the principle of working within targeted locations addressing gender, environmental and accountability considerations. Cross-cutting and context-specific issues Gender Humanitarian actors in Nigeria have committed to ensuring and promoting gender equality in the humanitarian response through the application of the Gender Marker, a tool designed to ensure that all segments of the target population will benefit equally. This will be achieved through working with sectors and implementing partners on two aspects: first, to build capacity around the design of “gender equality programming” to ensure more equitable participation and an appropriate distribution of humanitarian assistance. Second, to ensure monitoring of project implementation takes into account gender equality considerations. Early Recovery Early recovery plans should be integrated into humanitarian work to ensure the dividends of humanitarian response are sustainable and interventions link to longer-term development processes and goals. Although life-saving support remains the first priority, early recovery approaches aim to restore services, livelihoods and governance capacity, which are conducive to an environment where the displaced have the opportunity to access essential services, have viable livelihoods, and live in safety and dignity. Early recovery approaches also seek to involve 8 Nigeria STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN local authorities and communities in the planning as much as possible. Early recovery-centred approaches are not new to Nigeria; the Nigeria National Strategic Plan, the interim Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper (PRSP) and the 2013-2016 United Nations Development Assistance Framework (UNDAF) all reflect a policy-driven emphasis on opportunity-based transitions from relief to development. Constraints and how the sectors will address them The main constraint to the execution of this emergency response plan especially in north-eastern Nigeria is the insecurity due to the violent insurgency of Boko Haram, which has led to complete collapse of economic activities and displacement of thousands of households into neighbouring states and to refugees crossing borders to Niger, Cameroun and Chad. One upshot of the conflict has been a reduction in household food production in the region. Access to most of northern Nigeria is constrained due to insecurity, making data collection for humanitarian planning a challenge. Sectors will address the above constraints through regular assessment of the security situation in the north-east and will adjust their projects accordingly. The UN in particular will implement the recommendations from the programme criticality assessment conducted in 2012 as one of the measures to minimize risks in the highly insecure environment of Nigeria. Periodic joint meetings will be held with the humanitarian country team to evaluate the security situation, and decisions will be taken as to security advisories so that humanitarian actors are able to deliver assistance and remain safe. Direct efforts will be geared towards strengthening institutional capacities of relevant Government line ministries and agencies in data collection and management. Close collaboration will also be developed between stakeholders to reduce vulnerability and build community resilience, especially in flood and drought prone areas. Regular vulnerability assessments and food and nutrition analyses will be envisaged, especially in the Sahelian regions of Nigeria where drought is more frequent. Response monitoring The Government and humanitarian country team in Nigeria will set up and manage a response monitoring framework. The monitoring framework will outline the process, timing, and responsibilities for the gathering and analysis of data on the collective humanitarian response; set forth scheduled intervals for reporting key findings; and provide evidence for decision-making and corrective action. The inter-sectoral coordination group will track and analyse outcome and output indicators and measure progress against the strategic objectives of the response. Sector coordinators will aggregate project outputs and assess outcome indicators, and measure progress towards sector objectives while individual organizations will register their projects’ output results and feed them to the respective sectors. Analysis of monitoring information will feed into a number of reporting products, including the Humanitarian Bulletin, the Humanitarian Dashboard, and sector reports. The frequency of reporting will be quarterly for most indicators. In the first few months following the launch of the SRP, output-level reporting will be carried out on a monthly basis. The first report was released at the end of January 2014. Outcome-level monitoring will take place at mid-term review and at the end of the SRP cycle. STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES AND INDICATORS STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE 1: Track and analyse risk and vulnerability, integrating findings into humanitarian and development programming Indicator Baseline and targets Explanation/Monitoring method 9 STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN Indicator Nigeria Baseline and targets Base End2014 Explanation/Monitoring method 2015 2016 Early warning mechanisms established for food security, malnutrition, epidemics, displacement and disasters Number of priority risks (food security, malnutrition, epidemics, displacement and disasters) that have early warning mechanisms e.g. the Cadre Harmonise for food security Food Security FEWSNET 2 2 2 Nutrition Nutrition survey (SMART) 2 4 6 62 62 62 Existence of vulnerability data sets Vulnerability for all sectors and regions Mapping 2 4 6 Number of sectors with vulnerability data sets (e.g. CH for food sec) Risk and vulnerability analysis 45% integrated in country UNDAFs, Common Country Assessments (CCA) and SRPs and other key international planning instruments 55% 80% 100% Percentage of international planning instruments existing in country which include a risk and vulnerability analysis Epidemics Collected by the Food Sec, Nutrition, Health, Protection Clusters and OCHA and/or RCO Weekly CSM Update National development plans and budgets target vulnerablepopulation Yes Collected by OCHA and/or RCO through document review. Yes Yes Yes This is a yes/ no indicator Collected by OCHA and/or RCO through document review. Agricultural investments target marginalised and vulnerable households (AGIR indicator) 10% 20% 40% 60% Percentage of agricultural investments targeting marginalised and vulnerable households. This indicator is included in the AGIR framework. Collected by FAO and/or the Food Security Cluster by document review. STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE 2: Support vulnerable populations to better cope with shocks by responding earlier to warning signals, by reducing post-crisis recovery times and by building capacity of national actors Indicator 10 Baseline and targets Explanation/Monitoring method Nigeria STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN Indicator Baseline and targets Base Improve coping capacity of affected 15.1 households (measured by the coping strategies index (CSI) Explanation/Monitoring method End2014 2015 2016 - - - This index has been used in Niger by WFP. It measures the coping capacity and recovery period WFP at regional level is supportive of expanding its use to other Sahel countries. We would discuss with WFP in country. Increase recovery rates of affected households (measured by the Coping Strategies 20 Development and implementation of Yes national social protection policies and programmes (AGIR) Stabilisation or improvement of overall Cadre Harmonisé classification in livelihood zones over two seasons as a result of continued humanitarian assistance 7 An Early Action trigger mechanism for Yes emergencies developed and operational 25 30 35 Same as above Yes Yes Yes This is Yes/No indicator 8 8 8 Percentage of Admin 2 zones that remain stable or improve in the CH classification over a two season period. Collected by Food Security Cluster using PREGEC seasonal assessments Yes Yes Yes This is a Yes/No indicator Collected by OCHA and/or RCO STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE 3: Deliver coordinated and integrated life-saving assistance to people affected by emergencies Indicator People affected by emergencies receiving life-saving assistance Baseline and targets Explanation/Monitoring method Base End-2014 2015 2016 70% 90% 100% 100% Percentage of people affected receiving life-saving assistance. Collected by OCHA with data from clusters. Percentage funding spread between 60% 70% 90% 100% Percentage reduction in funding 11 STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN Indicator Nigeria Baseline and targets Explanation/Monitoring method clusters differences between sectors Measured by calculating the % average of the funding differences among sectors in the appeal Collected by OCHA using FTS data Number of people in Cadre Harmonise phase 3+4 - - - - (Food insecurity) Reduction of number of people Cadre Harmonise classification phase 3 (crisis) and phase 4 (urgency) Collected by Food Security Cluster using PREGEC assessments % of Children < 5 years with Severe 78.8% Acute Malnutrition discharged recovered (Malnutrition) Crude mortality rate (CMR) trend 78.8% 78.8% 78.8% 4.6/1000 4.6/1000 4.6/1000 Negative trend of CMR (Epidemics/Health) Under-5 mortality rate (U5MR) trend Collected by Nutrition cluster Collected by Health cluster 166 215 280 365 Negative trend of U5MR Collected by Health cluster (Epidemics/Health) Number of affected vulnerable 500,000 people (children, women, men) having received a timely and functional WASH minimum package adapted to their vulnerability(ies) (WASH) 12 30% 50% 80% Increase in number of affected vulnerable people receiving the WASH minimum package Collected by WASH cluster Nigeria STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN CLUSTER PLANS PEOPLE IN NEED PEOPLE TARGETED REQUIREMENTS (US$) 9.5 million 8.3 million 74.9 million Coordination Protection 9,500,000 500,000 Emergency Shelter Nutrition 1,957,082 4,200,000 Health 1,800,000 Coordination 4 9,400,000 Protection 2 8,000,000 Emergency Shelter 3,900,000 323,488 Food Security 8,300,000 4,200,000 in need targeted Nutrition 1 1 Food Security 5 Health 4 2,500,000 Education Education WASH 600,000 2,000,000 1 2,000,000 WASH 4,600,000 Early recovery 5 2 Early Recovery People in need (in thousands) People targeted (in thousands) Requirements (in millions of US$) Coordination 8.078.433 Early Recovery 8.050.000 Education 6,580,361 Food Security 10,683.159 Health 9,167,347 Emergency Shelter 4,500,000 Nutrition 2,333,666 Protection 2,752.831 WASH 11,937,502 TOTAL 74,860,697 13 STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN Nigeria COORDINATION Lead agency: National Emergency Management Agency (NEMA) and OCHA Contact information: Choice Okoro, OCHA okoroc@un.org PEOPLE IN NEED PEOPLE TARGETED REQUIREMENTS (US$) 9.5 million 8.3 million 2.6 million # OF PARTNERS 105 Government and humanitarian partners have been increasingly aware of the need to strengthen their joint efforts in responding to emergencies in Nigeria. The magnitude of the 2012 floods and the deteriorating situation in the north-east have highlighted the pressing need for more coordinated and more strategic planning among emergency management institutions (NEMA, SEMAs, Commission for Refugees and line ministries) and humanitarian partners. OCHA was instrumental in establishing the Humanitarian Country Team (HCT) comprising UN operational agencies, INGOs and donors in 2012. The HCT was instrumental in mobilizing funds ($6.5 million) from CERF to complement the Government’s response to the needs of 2.1 million people displaced in the 14 most affected states in 2012, and supported joint rapid assessments in north-eastern states. In addition, OCHA helped establish an inter-sectoral coordination mechanism which currently provides a platform for the development of the HNO and SRP. OCHA will continue to work with the relevant federal and state government agencies to strengthen national and sub-national coordination. OCHA’s investment will include capacity building and training for data collection and management, through joint assessment and collaboration with various actors including NGOs and media. STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE 1: Track and analyse risk and vulnerability, integrating findings into humanitarian and development programming. Activity Locations Mapping disaster prone areas North-West, North Central, SouthEast, South-South Number of disaster risk maps produced and shared Support strategic coordination through the HCT Abuja and across Nigeria Number of HCT /UNCT meetings/by quarter 14 Output Indicator Cluster/Sector partner Mid-2014 target End-2014 target All 10 20 All 6 12 Nigeria Support strategic coordination through the ISWG and sectors/clusters and participation of INGOS, NNGOs and government, where relevant Build the capacity of national counterparts to increase the ability of national institutions to better prepare and respond to emergencies STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN North-East, NorthWest, NorthCentral, SouthWest, SouthSouth, South-East Number of ISWG meetings/month All 6 12 North-East, NorthWest, North Central, SouthWest, SouthSouth, South-East North East, NorthWest, North Central, SouthWest, SouthSouth, South-East Number of IS strategic analysis communicated to HCT/UNCT All 4 8 Number of Sector/Cluster meetings/month All 13 27 North East, NorthWest, North Central, SouthWest, SouthSouth, South-East Number of INGOs participating in ISWG/month All 17 20 North East, NorthWest, North Central, SouthWest, SouthSouth, South-East Number of functional coordination mechanisms at decentralized level All 37 72 NEMA HQ and 6 Zonal Offices Number of training sessions for national counterparts (national authorities and civil society) Mapping of Potential Partners with capacity for humanitarian response All 2 4 All 50 60 All 30 35 All 2 3 North East, NorthWest, North Central, Southwest, South-South, South-East Conduct/facilitate coordinated multi-sectoral assessments with key partners North East, NorthWest, North Central, SouthWest, SouthSouth, South-East Trainings workshop on developing state level Contingency Plan for emergency preparedness and response in the selected states Assessment conducted in North Eastern Nigeria, 7 flood prone states and election conflict hotspots Number of coordinated multisectoral assessments with the participation of the government 15 STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN Nigeria Multi-sectoral analysis of risks, vulnerabilities and opportunities to identify priority needs/gaps (SADD analysis) Nigeria Create and regularly update country/regional baseline of harmonized information to facilitate joint analysis and better planning and monitoring Nigeria Support the development and review of country/regional HNO and SRP Nigeria Develop humanitarian information products as appropriate to support the situational understanding, humanitarian assessment and evidence-based response Nigeria Prioritisation tool (PT) regularly updated Number of risk analysis that include SADD Database regularly updated and accessible to key stakeholders All 1 2 All 2 4 Number of HNO and SRP developed and updated # of PT fully operational and regularly updated (quarterly) # of sectoral WG contributing to the elaboration of common strategy All 1 1 All 9 9 Number ok key information products developed per reporting schedule (snapshots, dashboards, sitreps, bulletins, 3Ws, etc.) All 10 20 EDUCATION Lead agency: name United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) Contact information: Judith Giwa –Amu jgiwaamu@unicef.org, +234 8033149205 PEOPLE IN NEED PEOPLE TARGETED REQUIREMENTS (US$) 2 million 600,000 6.5 million N0 OF PARTNERS 3 16 Nigeria STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN It is estimated that 600,000 Nigerian children have difficulty accessing education due to man made and natural disasters3. With the incessant attacks on schools, students and parents, the schooling environment has become increasingly insecure and many schools in disaster affected areas are being used as shelters for displaced people. Across the twelve states affected by floods in 2012, 4,199 schools (3,205 primary schools and 994 secondary schools) were either partially or severely damaged (PDNA, 2012). This resulted in the disruption of schooling and in the displacement of students to neighbouring schools which established a double shift system to cope with overcrowding. The use of school buildings as temporary shelters resulted in the loss of teaching and learning hours, poor coverage of curriculum content and failure to achieve school goals and objectives. Parents who could previously afford the higher fees imposed by private schools enrolled their children in public schools while many children from poor families were forced to drop out of school during this critical period, thus exacerbating inequality between children. In addition, school facilities were generally overstretched, and some furniture was taken for firewood by IDPs. In many cases, the government has not been quick to restore the damaged structures so that children can return to school. For this and other reasons, it is suggested that provision for alternative shelter spaces should be made in preparedness and contingency plans. Recurrent attacks on schools, learners and teachers have been reported in SoE states. In cities in north eastern Nigeria such as Maiduguri, many children can only attend school irregularly, while others have missed up to two years of schooling. The education sector, which has remained a frequent target of attacks, has been particularly hard hit by the crisis. In Borno State, 77 schools and 533 classrooms offering basic education have been burned, 5 teachers have been killed and 9,546 desks have been destroyed. 25 teachers and three students have been killed in the public senior secondary and high schools, and a further 10 students and one teacher suffered the same fate in private schools. Ministry of Education materials and buildings have also been vandalized in some schools by unknown gunmen. In Yobe, 21 schools have been burned down while others are in need of rehabilitation. For details, see Annex 2. Basic education has been the most affected aspect, and efforts to build back will take a long time. According to the survey supported by UNICEF in 2013, most communities reported that schools are not functioning. The escalating level of violence is threatening the education of hundreds of thousands of children as school attendance has plummeted in many areas affected by the conflict. Given the complex situation in these states, a more systematic approach is required to ensure delivery of education services is conflict sensitive and designed with explicit peace building interventions in mind in order to achieve better and more sustainable results for children. STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE 1: Track and analyse risk and vulnerability, integrating findings into humanitarian and development programming Joint Humanitarian Priority #1 FLOOD Activity Locations Output Indicator Cluster/SectorMid-2014 Partner target Actively involve community in the North East, NorthNumber of CSACEFA, risks and vulnerabilities analysis West, North Central, consultations held CELDA, South-West, South- that include Ministry of 50 End-2014 target 100 3 Education Sector intervention targets the most affected/vulnerable children and adolescents and directs support to a percentage of all the affected 17 STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN Activity Nigeria Locations Output Indicator Cluster/SectorMid-2014 Partner target South, South-East teachers and students Education North East, NorthWest, North Central Analyse the coordination mechanisms in the targeted areas North-West Region Community prioritized education activities CSACEFA, CELDA, Ministry of Education Effective sector coordination mechanisms are in place CSACEFA, CELDA, Ministry of Education Effective intersector coordination CSACEFA, mechanisms are in CELDA, place Ministry of Education Identify schools located in areas North East, NorthNumber of schools at risk West, North Central, inventoried South-West, SouthSouth, South-East CSACEFA, CELDA, Ministry of Education End-2014 target 360 550 2 4 2 4 20,000 40,000 Mid-2014 target End-2014 target 50 100 360 550 1000 2000 Joint Humanitarian Priority #3-Conflict Activity Locations Actively involve community in the North East Region risks and vulnerabilities analysis Output Indicator Cluster/ Sector Partner CSACEFA, Number of consultations held CELDA, Ministry of Education Community prioritizes education CSACEFA, activities CELDA, Ministry of Education Teachers and students are involved in conflict CSACEFA, analysis CELDA, Ministry of Education 18 Nigeria Activity STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN Locations Evaluate the impact of conflict on North East Region boys and girls education Carry out risk and conflict analyses of the education system North East Region Output Indicator Cluster/ Sector Partner Mid-2014 target End-2014 target Evaluation of learning achievements before, during and after food insecure period CSACEFA, CELDA, Ministry of Education 1 2 Drop-out rates disaggregated by gender before, during and after food insecure period CSACEFA, CELDA, Ministry of Education 1 2 Number of communities covered by the analysis CSACEFA, CELDA, Ministry of Education 10 30 STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE 2: Support vulnerable populations to better cope with shocks by responding earlier to warning signals, by reducing post-crisis recovery times and by building capacity of national actors. Joint Humanitarian Priority #1 Floods Activity Locations Output Indicator Cluster/ Sector partner Mid-2014 target End-2014 target Train teachers/other educational North-Central Region Number of personnel in hygiene promotion male/female teachers/other educational personnel trained CSACEFA, 50 CELDA, Ministry of Education 100 Build capacities of MoE at national and local level in emergency preparedness and response CSACEFA, 50 CELDA, Ministry of Education 100 CSACEFA, CELDA, 250 CSACEFA, CELDA, Ministry of Education 500 South-West Region Number of MoE officials trained at district/local level Number of male/female MoE officials trained at national level 19 STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN Activity Nigeria Locations Support and build capacities of South-East Region local stakeholders (traditional leaders, PTAs, parents, etc.) involved in education Output Indicator Cluster/ Sector partner Mid-2014 target No of parents in target areas participating in parenting education activities CSACEFA, 5000 CELDA, Ministry of Education No of school PTAs with agreed emergency plan CSACEFA, 100 and safety survey CELDA, Ministry of Number of Education traditional leaders in target areas participating in CSACEFA, 300 group discussions CELDA, on the role of girls Ministry of education, DRR, Education psychological support End-2014 target 10000 200 500 Joint Humanitarian Priority # CONFLICTS Activity Locations Output Indicator Cluster/ Sector partner Mid-2014 target End-2014 target Develop peace education and South-West, South- Number of modules conflict prevention modules South, North mainstreamed in the /support MoE to mainstream Central, North-East curriculum peace education and conflict prevention in the curriculum CSACEFA, 2 CELDA, Ministry of Education 2 Disseminate key messages on South-West, Southemergency life skills to South, North children and youth in Central, North-East temporary learning spaces /schools Number of emergency affected learning spaces/schools providing key messages CSACEFA, 10 CELDA, Ministry of CSACEFA, CELDA, Ministry of Education 20 Raise awareness on conflict North Central, resolution and social Northcohesion i.e. East Decrease in violent CSACEFA, 50% behaviour/incidents at CELDA, school/learning space in Ministry of 20 80% Nigeria Activity STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN Locations Output Indicator Cluster/ Sector partner Mid-2014 target Targeting traditional leaders target areas Education and members, CBO, FBO, School communities (Teachers and children) conduct Decrease in recorded 50% community and school level violations against CSACEFA, Dialogues and Engages using South-West, schools/teachers/studentsCELDA, selected advocacy tools and South-South, North Ministry of communication materials (with Education emphasis on social cohesion, Central, North-East Number of surveyed peacebuilding and conflict resolution) and channels that students/teachers 150 are culturally appropriate. At reporting that they feel CSACEFA, school level –increase South-West, safe travelling to and from CELDA, knowledge base of learners South-South, North-school Ministry of using developed modules and Central, North-East Education manual on peacebuilding and conflict resolution to build children as agents of behavioural change to their communities. End-2014 target 80% 250 STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE 3: Deliver coordinated and integrated life-saving assistance to people affected by emergencies. Joint Humanitarian Priority #Flood Activity Locations Output Indicator Cluster/ Sector Partner Mid-2014 target End-2014 target Undertake rapid joint need assessments South-East North Central, North East Number of inter-cluster or from other clusters assessments that include education questions CSACEFA, CELDA, Ministry of Education 3 4 CSACEFA, CELDA, Ministry of Education 2 4 100 250 Number of education joint assessments that include data desegregated by gender/age/disability Number of schools having conducted risk analyses CSACEFA, CELDA, Ministry of Education 21 STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN Nigeria Activity Locations Output Indicator Cluster/ Sector Partner Mid-2014 target End-2014 target Conduct awareness campaigns in school on life skills/life-saving messages South-South, North Central, North East Number of boys/girls reached CSACEFA, CELDA, Ministry of Education 2000 4000 1000 2000 Number of teachers reached Distribute learning kits 22 CSACEFA, CELDA, Ministry of Education North Central North Number of learning CSACEFA, 20,000 Central kits distributed to the CELDA, schools Ministry of Education Number of children benefiting from the CSACEFA, learning kit CELDA, 40,000 distribution Ministry of (boys/girls) Education 40,000 80,000 Nigeria STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN FOOD SECURITY Lead Agency: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) Contact information: Louise Setshwaelo louise.setshwaelo@fao.org PEOPLE IN NEED PEOPLE TARGETED REQUIREMENTS (US$) 4.2 million 1 million 10.6 million # OF PARTNERS 10 Nigeria has suffered from multiple hazards in recent times, whether natural or man made. Many rural communities are vulnerable to floods, drought, plant pests and livestock diseases, as well as soil erosion. Violent insurgency in the north of the country has also resulted in social and political unrest, slowing down economic activity including agriculture in the north-east. This has increased the risk of food security in localized areas of Borno and Yobe states. Appropriate response measures are needed to reduce the impact of violence and unrest. Several food security and malnutrition assessments have been undertaken by UN and partner agencies in northern states in particular and in Nigeria in general. According to UNCT assessments of the SoE states, 5,972,760 million persons are affected by the insurgency in Borno, Adamawa and Yobe states. This includes 27 LGAs in Borno state, 6 LGAs in Adamawa state (Mubi North, Yola North, Yola South, Girei, Numan, Mayo Belwa) and 5 LGAs in Yobe state (Damaturu, Potiskum, Geidem, Fune, Gujba). Around 1 million people will be targeted for support out of the 4.2 million people assessed to be in need. Although the government at both national and sub-national levels has continued to provide some support to reduce the extent of food insecurity among the most vulnerable population, there is an apparent need for a combination of life-saving assistance and longer-term measures to protect and improve the livelihood of vulnerable groups and provide better estimates of support needed and overall preparedness measures to take for emergencies. There is also a need to ensure that relevant programmes are put in place and sufficiently supported to reduce vulnerabilities and chronic malnutrition, through better response planning and programming, including institutionalizing safety-net programmes for the most vulnerable and food insecure. Similarly, more financial support is required to speed up programme implementation. Adoption of the most appropriate transfer modality will be encouraged and a wide range of mutually supportive interventions will be promoted, involving national, NGO and UN actors to streamline capacity building at local, national and regional levels. 23 STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN Nigeria The immediate priorities for the food security sector aim to accelerate recovery from the trauma of the emergency period rebuild household food supply chains and reinstate production capacity. Meanwhile, immediate interventions are needed in the form of direct food supply and cash assistance to purchase food. Although federal and state governments, philanthropists and NGOs have been providing assistance, a lot more needs to be done to reach those affected. Some of the most vulnerable people are located in remote areas without access to markets. Immediate interventions that can be supported under this SRP include: UNCT to advocate with the Government to release more grain from the national reserve to compensate for the high food prices in the SoE states. Agencies, national and international NGOs could also be encouraged to implement projects that support household and community coping mechanisms. Immediate cash transfer programme to be implemented in affected states to buy food and essential household items such as cooking utensils and kerosene. Direct distribution of food items to households in the most affected communities. National and state based NGOs with capacity and expertise to be mobilized as partners to reach remote areas and most vulnerable households. These interventions would improve household food security in the short term and would keep famine and crisis at arm’s length. For the intermediate and medium term, household capacity to build resilience will be supported. To this end, affected farmers will be provided with seeds, fertilizer and tools making it possible for them to return and cultivate their farmlands. To address Medium Acute Malnutrition (MAM), food-based interventions will be promoted to improve household diet quality, and to overcome and prevent malnutrition and nutritional deficiencies especially in children. To build resilience to climate and sustainable food security systems, conservation agriculture techniques and use of high yielding drought resistant crop varieties will be introduced to farming communities . STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE 1: Track and analyse risk and vulnerability, integrating findings into humanitarian and development programming Joint Humanitarian Priority #1Food Insecurity Activity Locations Output Indicator Cluster/ Sector partner Identifying risk areas and vulnerable populations through joint analysis of Food Security, Nutrition , and Markets North-West and North East States, Flood plain areas Abia State, Benue State, Kogi State, number of joint analytical work leading to the identification of risk area FSWG 2 4 Strengthening food security coordination at regional / national and inter sectoral level North-West and North East States, number of inter sectoral sector meetings FSWG 2 4 Strengthening national Early Warning Systems through create public awareness at national and sub-national levels on rationale, concepts, protocols/ methodologies and use of food security vulnerability assessments and analysis. North-West and North East States, Flood plain areas Abia State, Benue State, Kogi State, No of State and Federal level staff trained and able to predict and mitigate future crises. FEWSNET 200 400 24 Mid-2014 target End-2014 target Nigeria STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN Activity Locations Output Indicator Cluster/ Sector partner Training and development of skills of national and state level experts on the use of IPC as a tool for food security vulnerability analysis and reporting. North-West and North East States, Flood plain areas Abia State, Benue State, Kogi State, States and Federal level staff trained and able to use IPC as a tool for food security vulnerability analysis All 200 400 Support selected states to carryout vulnerability assessments, analysis and reporting for 3 years; North-West and North East States, Flood plain areas Abia State, Benue State, Kogi State, Support selected states to carryout vulnerability assessments, analysis and reporting for 3 years; FSWG 5 10 Support communication and application/use of information for decision making by State and Federal government as well as development and humanitarian partners. North-West and North East States, Flood plain areas Abia State, Benue State, Kogi State, Reports used by States and Federal Government to inform policy and programs responses on food security and nutrition FSWG 2 4 Mid-2014 target End-2014 target Joint Humanitarian Priority #3 Conflict Activity Locations Output Indicator Cluster/ Sector Partner Analysis of the response capacity of different actors to address food insecurity in conflict affected areas North East States number of analyses made All 2 4 Knowledge management and capitalization of good practices to ensure food security for people affected by a conflict North East States number of actions of capitalization of good food security practices in areas affected by a conflict All 1 2 Mid-2014 target End-2014 target Joint Humanitarian Priority #3 Disasters (Floods, droughts…) Activity Locations Output Indicator Cluster/ Sector partner Mid-2014 target End-2014 target 25 STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN Nigeria Mid-2014 target End-2014 target Analysis of the response capacity North-West and North number of analyses FSWG made of different actors to address food East States, Flood plain areas insecurity in case of disaster Abia State, Benue State, Kogi State, 1 2 Communicate/share with partners North-West and North number of analyses All at regional, national and local East States, shared levels, analysis and early Flood plain areas warnings on food security Abia State, Benue following a natural disaster State, Kogi State, 3 6 Knowledge management and North-West and capitalization of good practices North East States, to ensure food security of Flood plain areas populations facing natural Abia State, Benue disasters State, Kogi State, 1 2 Activity Locations Output Indicator Cluster/ Sector partner number of actions All of capitalization of good food security practices coping with natural disasters STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE 2: Support vulnerable populations to better cope with shocks by responding earlier to warning signals, by reducing post-crisis recovery times and by building capacity of national actors Joint Humanitarian Priority #1 Food Insecurity Mid-2014 target End-2014 target North-West and North Farmers in the All East States, North East and Flood plain areas North-West region Abia State, Benue adopting State, Kogi State adaptation measures to reduce the impact of droughts and climate change. 1 1 Promote Conservation Agriculture (CA) techniques to farming systems in the northern states to build resilience and adaptation to drought and climate change. North-West and North Farmers in the All East States, Sahel region Flood plain areas adopting Abia State, Benue adaptation State, Kogi State measures to reduce the impact of droughts and climate change. 300 600 Timely sharing analysis and early warnings containing recommended preventive measures (awareness) at local, North-West and North number of timely East States, issued alerts Flood plain areas Abia State, Benue 12 12 Activity Locations Introduce climate-smart agriculture concepts and technologies in selected states in the north 26 Output Indicator Cluster/ Sector Partner All Nigeria Activity STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN Locations Output Indicator Cluster/ Sector Partner Mid-2014 target End-2014 target 6 6 national and regional levels for State, Kogi State all sectors Pre-positioning of emergency food stocks at local, national and regional levels North-West and North number of storage All East States, sites identified, Flood plain areas brought up to Abia State, Benue standards and State, Kogi State secured Protect and rehabilitate / North-West and strengthen livelihoods of P North East States, and VP households through Flood plain areas the distribution of agricultural Abia State, Benue inputs where State, Kogi State number of households assisted in the main season All 10000 20000 number of households assisted in irrigated crops All 10000 20000 Mid-2014 target End-2014 target 40 80 Joint Humanitarian Priority #2 Malnutrition Activity Locations Output Indicator Cluster/ Sector Partner Build capacity of local government institutions on programming for food and nutrition security. North-West and North Number of local East States, government institutions practicing programming for food and nutrition security Joint food security/nutrition training to promote good nutritional practices using appropriate training materials North-West and North number of people FSWG, Federal 200 East States, trained and State ministry of Health Promotion of high nutritional North-West and number of value vegetable varieties North East States, household production beneficiaries All All 15000 400 20000 Joint Humanitarian Priority #5 Disasters (Floods, drought) Activity Locations Output Indicator Cluster/ Sector Partner number of Development of contingency North-West and plans for natural disasters to North East States, contingency Flood plain areas plans made ensure food security at Abia State, Benue All Mid-2014 target End-2014 target 1 1 27 STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN Activity Locations Nigeria Output Indicator Cluster/ Sector Partner community , national and regional levels Mid-2014 target End-2014 target State, Kogi State STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE 3: Deliver coordinated and integrated life-saving assistance to people affected by emergencies Joint Humanitarian Priority #1 Food Insecurity Activity Locations Output Indicator Cluster/ Sector Partner Mid-2014 target Federal and 1000000 Distribution of agricultural inputs North-West and North No of vulnerable East States, household able to State ministry of (vegetable seeds, fertilizers, produce their own Health small agricultural tools, irrigation Flood plain areas Abia State, Benue food using l systems, agricultural material to State, Kogi State agricultural inputs build fences, etc.) to vulnerable (improved seeds, households for rehabilitation of fertilizers, small agriculture agricultural tools, agricultural material to build fences, drought resistant vegetable varieties etc.) for all-year round production No of vulnerable household engaged in good Local agricultural Government marketing practices department of (storage, agriculture processing, packaging ) 1000000 End-2014 target 2000000 2000000 Strengthening the food chain North-West and North percentage Federal and 50% and marketing sector (storage, East States, decrease in State ministry of processing and transportation of Flood plain areas malnutrition and Health agricultural goods). Abia State, Benue stunting indicators State, Kogi State among the vulnerable population 80% Unconditional cash transfers 14000 28 North-West and North number of CRS, ACF, East States, households IOM, UNICEF Flood plain areas receiving Abia State, Benue unconditional cash 7000 Nigeria Activity Emergency distribution of agricultural and livestock inputs STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN Locations Output Indicator State, Kogi State transfer North-West and North East States, Flood plain areas Abia State, Benue State, Kogi State number of households assisted in the main season Cluster/ Sector Partner Mid-2014 target Federal and 200000 State ministry of Health End-2014 target 400000 29 STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN Nigeria HEALTH Lead agency: WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION (WHO) Contact information: Dr Jean Marie Yameogo yameogoj@who.int PEOPLE IN NEED 2.5 million PEOPLE TARGETED 1.8 million REQUIREMENTS (US$) 9.1 millions # OF PARTNERS 5 In recent years Nigeria has suffered devastating emergencies such as post-election violence in 2011; insurgency; the floods of 2012 in which serious and extensive damages were recorded, and which were the first of their kind in Nigeria; environmental disasters of erosion, land slides, lead poisoning and oil spillage in the Niger Delta; the ocean surge; communal clashes and a current state of emergency in Borno, Yobe and Adamawa states in the north-east of the country. Post election violence in 2011 led to the loss of many lives and destruction of properties worth hundreds of millions across the country. The 2012 floods cost Nigeria over $7 billion in economic terms, affected over seven million people and displaced more than 2 million people, 597,476 houses were either damaged or destroyed, 363 people died and much farm land and produce was destroyed4. Approximately 75% of those displaced were women and children under five years old. Since 2009, increasingly frequent and sophisticated attacks and bombings, attributed to Boko Haram, have been carried out, and ensuing heavy-handed counter-insurgency operations have caused death, destruction of property and significant displacement. Before 2009, most political violence in Nigeria occurred in the south, in the densely populated Niger Delta region which is home to the country’s oil and gas industry. Fighting between militants and Government forces deployed to protect oil installations and personnel led to further displacement. Communal clashes affected almost every part of the country, including the north-west, north-east, north-central and south-east. Many lives were lost and properties, farm land and produce destroyed. Environmental disaster included the landslide in the South-South, South-East and lead poisoning in Zamfara state causing loss of life, environmental damage, impairing health and rendering farmland useless. Ocean surges in Lagos occurred in 2012 and 2013, occasioning loss of life and destruction of property. Most disaster affected people in Nigeria take shelter in schools, churches, mosques, town halls, and in makeshift camps and NEMA camps which are grossly inadequate and unsustainable. Host communities accommodating IDPs mostly become overstretched and overwhelmed. To date there is no standard mechanism or effective system of distribution of non-food items for IDPs accommodated by host communities who make up the majority; schools that serve as temporary shelters interrupt pupils’ education. The lead poisoning in Zamfara state that continues to cause considerable loss of life, endanger health and degrade the environment is caused by the use of cyanide, a chemical used by artisan miners/illegal miners in mining to separate precious stones from soil and clay particles and then concentrate the mineral in one chunk. It is a scientific fact that cyanide is a highly hazardous and 4 The Post Disaster Needs Assessment on the 2012 Floods (March 2013) 30 Nigeria STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN corrosive poison that kills adults gradually and kills children almost immediately. It is for this reason that many industrialized countries have banned the use of cyanide in mining. The health sector will respond to the direct impact of these hazards and will ensure linkage to programmes addressing malnutrition and epidemics such as cholera and other water borne diseases. In addition, the health sector will adopt an integrated response that will address diarrheal diseases, inpatient care, essential drugs, malaria and HIV preparedness and response including prevention of communicable diseases through awareness raising with communities in high risk (security) areas. STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE 1: Track and analyse risk and vulnerability, integrating findings into humanitarian and development programming. Joint Humanitarian Priority #2 addressing the humanitarian impact Natural disasters (floods, etc.) Activity Locations Output Indicator Cluster/ Sector Partner Mid-2014 target End-2014 target Advocacy on the analysed vulnerabilities requiring support North East, North-West, North Central, SouthWest, South-South, South-East Health Number of joint advocacy related to vulnerability analysis . 3 6 Conduct an evaluation of the response capacities of the health sector North East, NorthWest, North Central, South-West, SouthSouth, South-East Number of Health Sector 3 assessment Federal and reports of the State ministry health sector of Health response capacity taking into account age, gender and disability 6 Joint multi-sectoral North-East, Northvulnerability analysis taking West, North Central, into account age, gender South-West, Southand disability South, South-East Number of Health Sector 5 meetings on the Federal and assessment of the State ministry health sector response capacity of Health taking into account age, gender and disability 10 Mapping and risk analysis in the health sector North East, NorthWest, North-Central, South-west, SouthSouth, South-East Number of multisectoral analysis reports taking into account age, gender and disability Health Sector 6 Federal and State ministry of Health 6 Strengthen interregional coordination mechanisms North East, NorthWest, North Central, South-West, SouthSouth, South-East Number of reports Health Sector 1 based on risk mapping and analysis in the 2 31 STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN Activity Locations Nigeria Output Indicator Cluster/ Sector Partner Mid-2014 target End-2014 target health sector taking into account age, gender and disability Joint Humanitarian Priority #4: Addressing the humanitarian impact of Epidemics (cholera, malaria, etc.) Activity Locations Output Indicator Assess the coverage of epidemic response campaigns North East, North-West, North-Central, Southwest, South-South, South-East Number of children All who actually received preventive intervention Capacity analysis to response to epidemics North East, North-West, supported North-Central, Southassessments West, South-South, South-East Develop a map of epidemic risk North-East, North-West, contingency plans All North-Central, Souththat include an West, South-South, analysis of the local South-East Cluster/ Mid-2014 Sector partner target End-2014 target 150000 350000 50 100 1 1 Epidemiology department Ministry of Health 2000 2500 Reinforce existing sentinel North East, North-West, Number of cases Epidemology sites for monitoring potential North-Central, South- detected department west, South-South, epidemic diseases Ministry of South-East Number of projects Health which support communication for sentinel surveillance system 2000 2000 2 2 Number of Health Sector Number of and national capacity to respond to outbreaks Reinforce early warning systems for existing potential epidemics or diseases in health facilities and at community level . 32 North-East, North-West, Number of cases North Central, Southdetected west, South-South, South-East Nigeria STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN Activity Locations Output Indicator Cluster/ Mid-2014 Sector partner target End-2014 target Monitor and evaluate the response to epidemics North East, NorthWest, North Central, South-west, SouthSouth, South-East Number of response objectives that have been achieved Epidemiology 3 department Ministry of Health 6 STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE 3: Deliver coordinated and integrated life-saving assistance to people affected by emergencies. Joint Humanitarian Priority: Addressing the humanitarian impact Natural disasters (floods, etc.) Activity Locations Output Indicator Baseline Ensure effective and efficient coordination of humanitarian health activities North East, NorthWest, North Central, South-west, SouthSouth, South-East Number of « Who Health Sector does What Where » disseminated to the public Number of updated stakeholders’ Health Sector contact lists available per month Mid-2014 target End-2014 target 20 40 100 2000 33 STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN Nigeria NUTRITION Lead agency: UNICEF Contact information: Stanley Chitekwe schitekwe@unicef.org PEOPLE IN NEED PEOPLE TARGETED REQUIREMENTS (US$) 3.9 million 323,488 2.3 million # OF PARTNERS 25 Nigeria has the second highest acute malnutrition burden in the world. An estimated 3.78 million children suffer from wasting. In northern states, the prevalence of wasting ranges from 1.5% in Yobe to 3.7% in Katsina (SMART nutrition survey, August 2013). This is also the region with the highest child mortality rate and the worst social and economic indicators. Following release of the National Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) in 2008, showing very high levels of acute malnutrition in the country, in 2009 UNICEF Nigeria introduced the Community-based Management of Acute Malnutrition (CMAM) programme. With the onset of the nutrition crisis in the Sahel mainly in the eight Sahelian states in the north of the country, the UNICEF Nigeria country office has been supporting the Government in implementing a scaled-up CMAM programme; from a targeted 6,000 children in 2009 the CMAM raised the bar to support 200,000 children 2012, so as to meet the increasing number of cases of Severe Acute Malnutrition (SAM). UNICEF, in collaboration with the federal and state Ministries of Health and sector partners plans to continue strengthening the CMAM interventions to provide effective treatment for children with Severe Acute Malnutrition (SAM) in eight Sahelian states in the north. During emergency situations, there is an increased risk of death especially among children under five due to frequent cases of infection and high rates of malnutrition. The fundamental means of preventing malnutrition and mortality is to ensure appropriate feeding and care. Children suffering from acute malnutrition have a high risk of dying, thus management of acute malnutrition during the emergency is an urgent priority. From current estimates, about 30% of affected people are living in IDP camps (2,152,699) while the others are living with host communities (5,022,965). Of this number, 30% are estimated to be children under the age of five of whom 87,184 are expected to be severely malnourished and some 258,324 moderately malnourished. While reports indicated that rainfall might continue until the end of November, the flood shows no sign of receding. Livelihoods of the displaced have also been destroyed leaving them devoid of a coping mechanism for the coming year. The state of emergency is maintained in Borno, Yobe and Adamawa states and security has been one of the major challenges to delivering routine nutrition programmes. It is imperative to continue providing nutritional services through CMAM to children with Severe Acute Malnutrition (SAM) in the region, with specific focus to 11 Sahelian states. Recent results from SMART nutrition surveys indicate that there is a need to continue treating children with SAM in these areas. In 2014 alone, a total of 539,147 cases of SAM are expected to require treatment through CMAM services in the 11 Sahelian states of Adamawa, Bauchi, Borno, Gombe, Jigawa, Kano, Katsina, Kebbi, Sokoto, Yobe and Zamfara. Continued and strengthened Community Infant and Young Child Feeding (c-IYCF) interventions, principally in the form of counselling, are planned in 495 PHC/CMAM sites for the promotion of exclusive breast feeding and complimentary feeding practices. The estimated budget is for procurement of Ready-to-Use Therapeutic Foods (RUTF), logistics and a nutrition survey for monitoring purposes. The budget is based on 60% of the total estimated SAM burden (539,147) for the year in eleven Sahelian states, to assist 323,488 children. 34 Nigeria STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE 1: Track and analyse risk and vulnerability, integrating findings into humanitarian and development programming Joint Humanitarian Priority # 1 Malnutrition Activity Locations Output Indicator Cluster/ Sector Partner Nutrition surveys Sahelian States Number of regions covered by a nutritional survey and prevalence’s of malnutrition (all forms) in children less than 5 years All Number Of regions covered by coverage surveys All Mid-2014 target End-2014 target 24 24 8 8 Evaluation of real-time responses (TEN) Sahelian States Number Regions covered by a real-time evaluation of the response All 2 2 Coordination of nutrition actors - mapping - information sharing Sahelian States Number of information reports, mapping available Health 4 4 Support and encourage countries to participate in global initiatives as SUN, REACH, AGIR Sahelian States presence of multi-sector common result framework for nutrition and actions Strengthening health systems: diagnostic & priority actions plan Sahelian States Number of health facility with adequate and qualified staffing and information system Health 50 100 Monitoring and evaluation involving the most vulnerable Sahelian States Number state supported with effective Health 8 8 Federal 2 Government 4 35 STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN Activity Nigeria Locations Output Indicator Cluster/ Sector Partner Mid-2014 target End-2014 target mechanisms for representative and participatory input from all users at all phases STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE 2: Support vulnerable populations to better cope with shocks by responding earlier to warning signals, by reducing post-crisis recovery times and by building capacity of national actors Joint Humanitarian Priority # 2 Malnutrition / Food insecurity Activity Locations Output Indicator Cluster/ Sector Partner Provision of guidance and training of health staff and community health workers in IMAM / CMAM Sahelian States Number of health staff and community health worker trained in IMAM/CMAM Federal Ministry of Health 1000 2000 Provision of guidance and training of health staff and community health workers Sahelian States Number of health staff and community health worker trained Federal Ministry of Health 1000 2000 Stock prepositioning (nutrition and health essential supplies) and hub management Sahelian States Number nutrition supplies and essential drugs prepositioned Federal and state Ministry of Health 200000 Evidence based advocacy to support national investment on nutrition activities Sahelian states number of advocacy activities Health Sector 5 5 Number of health facility with adequate and qualified staffing and information system Federal and state Ministry of Health 15000 20000 Strengthen health facility & community systems including data and information management Mid-2014 target End-2014 target 400000 STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE 3: Deliver coordinated and integrated life-saving assistance 36 Nigeria STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN to people affected by emergencies Joint Humanitarian Priority # 2 Malnutrition Activity Locations Output Indicator Cluster/ Sector Partner Integrated management of severe acute malnutrition Sahel States Number Children 659 months (Number boys & girls) affected by severe acute malnutrition admitted for treatment Nutrition 161,744 323,488 Micronutrient supplementation and deworming Sahel States Children under 5 numbers receiving adequate micronutrient supplementation Nutrition 12469316 24,938,632 Number of children under 5 years dewormed Nutrition Mid-2014 target End-2014 target 3879343 7,758,685 Performance and quality monitoring of nutrition programmes Sahel States number of supported health centre providing monthly monitoring of IMAM (admissions and performance indicators ) Nutrition 248 495 Provide essential nutrition and health supply to affected population Sahel States Number of supported health centres with adequate stocks of RUTF (no short-cut reported) Nutrition 248 495 37 STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN Nigeria SHELTER AND NON FOOD ITEMS Lead agency: Internation Organization for Migration (IOM) Contact information: Uche Hilary-Ogbonna uhilaryogbonna@iom.int PEOPLE IN NEED PEOPLE TARGETED REQUIREMENTS (US$) 8 million 1.9 million 4.5 million # OF PARTNERS 5 Access to portable water in Nigeria is limited to about 58.5% of the population, while access to basic sanitation and hygiene is limited to 32% (Multi Indicator Cluster Survey 2012). During floods the majority of water facilities are destroyed thereby reducing access to portable water. In the flood disaster of 2012, according to PDNA reporting, damage to water facilities was estimated at over $79 billion. The report also highlighted a generalized reduction in access to water for drinking and domestic use as flood victims had to travel longer distances and spend more time to collect water following the disaster. Early in 2013, the Nigerian Meteorological Agency Seasonal Rainfall Prediction (SRP) indicated that high rainfalls leading to flooding are to be expected in some parts of the country. The 2013 Annual Flood Outlook (AFO) released by the Nigerian Hydrological Services Agency (NIHSA) confirmed NIMET’s forecast. It expected that the need for WASH will increase with the flood season from June to November 2014. Insecurity in the states under a state of emergency (SoE) in the north-east has led to population movement to the neigbouring states and weakened LGAs affected access to WASH services. A September 2013 assessment of SoE states by the UNCT noted that in Borno State 70% of the respondents reported that water and sanitation facilities were overstretched as a result of the influx of people from high risk LGAs to low risk LGAs. However, given the timeframe of the assessment, it was difficult to ascertain the actual figure of the displaced population at household level. In Yobe state 60% of the respondents reported that access to good water and sanitation in the LGAs covered by the report is adequate. Adamawa state has a minimum level of contamination in comparison with other states. In all the affected areas, per capita availability of water supply in the north-east has decreased to one third of precrisis levels. Frequent power cuts, fuel shortages, production and maintenance of water works along with infrastructure damages have a direct impact on water supplies in the area. Estimated pre-crisis availability of 75 litres per person per day dropped to an average of 20 litres per person per day. Access to water treatment chemicals has also become increasingly difficult. Water utilities establishments in most parts of the affected LGAs were moribund even before the declaration of the state of emergency. Water is distributed by water trucks but chlorination is not systematically carried out by public and private water truckers. The non-availability of treatment plants for properly treating and disposing of waste, further increases the discharge of untreated waste into the environment with a heightened risk of ground and surface water contamination. Poor hygiene practices in densely-populated areas and collective shelters (more than one family per household) are increasing the risk of epidemic disease outbreaks. Children and women in collective shelters are more exposed to unsanitary conditions, including unsafe drinking water and a lack of water for personal hygiene, placing them at 38 Nigeria STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN further risk of water-borne diseases, including diarrhoea and skin diseases, such as scabies. In particular children and women are more exposed to unsanitary conditions due to lack of toilet facilities. To make matters worse, displaced persons have been observed using the limited number of toilets in their host communities for bathing and other washing purposes, not only increasing the demand on the sewer or discharge system, but demonstrating their overall inability to maintain good hygiene practices. There is also a lack of water for basic needs such as personal hygiene, menstruation management, washing clothes and flushing toilets. STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE 1: Track and analyse risk and vulnerability, integrating findings into humanitarian and development programming. Joint Humanitarian Priority: FLOOD/ CONFLICT Addressing the humanitarian impact Natural disasters (floods, etc.) Activity Locations Output Indicator Cluster/ Sector Partner Evaluation of shelter and NFI household needs, in areas with high potential risk of flooding North East and South- Number assessed All South flood prone areas Mapping of houses in areas with National high potential risk of flooding Number of houses Federal mapped Ministry of Housing Mapping of relocation areas of populations in regions at risk of flooding National Number of relocation sites mapped Assessment of shelter rehabilitation needs for returnees and non-displaced vulnerable living in conflicts zones South-west, SouthSouth, North Central, North East Number Regions All (admin 2 level) evaluated Mid-2014 target End-2014 target 10 20 500000 1000000 Federal Ministry of Housing 15 4 30 6 STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE 2: Support vulnerable populations to better cope with shocks by responding earlier to warning signals, by reducing post-crisis recovery times and by building capacity of national actors. Joint Humanitarian Priority: FLOOD/ CONFLICT Activity Locations Pre-positioning of shelter/NFI Nigeria contingency stocks in regions at Output Indicator Cluster/ Sector Partner Number of region SWG with a contingency Mid-2014 target 3 End-2014 target 6 39 STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN Activity Locations Nigeria Output Indicator Cluster/ Sector Partner Mid-2014 target End-2014 target risk of flooding. stock Training local masons in areas at Nigeria risk of flooding, on "flood resistant" construction techniques Number of masons SWG trained 100,000 200,000 Distribution of tool kits and material kits for vulnerable households in conflict areas South-west, SouthNumber of SWG South, North Central, households North East receiving tools and material kit 100,000 200,000 Capacity building trainings for Shelter/NFI Sector members Abuja Number of persons SWG trained 15 30 Advocacy & Mobilization: Nigeria Sensitization, Information sharing, Media relations and campaigns Number of persons SWG reached 1,500 000 Capacity building trainings for South-west, SouthSouth, North Central, partners at the sub national North East level Number of persons trained SWG 2,500 000 200 300 STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE 3: Deliver coordinated and integrated life-saving assistance to people affected by emergencies Joint Humanitarian Priority: FLOOD/ CONFLICT Activity Locations Output Indicator Cluster/ Sector Partner Mid-2014 target End-2014 target 500 000 1,000 000 One time distribution of non-food South-west, SouthSouth, North Central, items to flood affected North East households Number of households receiving NFI Number of households receiving NFI South-South, North Construction / rehabilitation of Central, North East damaged houses in areas not prone to flooding or in relocation areas Number of houses SWG built 10,000 20,000 South-west, SouthConstruction/rehabilitation of housing for vulnerable people in South, North Central, North East conflict affected areas whose homes were damaged; priority to Number of houses SWG restored/rebuilt 15,000 30,000 40 SWG Nigeria Activity STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN Locations Output Indicator Cluster/ Sector Partner Mid-2014 target End-2014 target Distribution of tents for families affected by flooding North /Niger Delta Number of tents distributed Number of tents distributed SWG 50,000 100,000 Rental support for IDPs through financial allowance Nigeria Number of SWG persons assisted 20,000 50,000 women heads of households 41 STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN Nigeria PROTECTION Lead agency: United Nations High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR) Contact information: Angele Dikongue-Atangana dikongue@unhcr.org PEOPLE IN NEED PEOPLE TARGETED REQUIREMENTS (US$) 9.4 million 500,000 2.7 million # OF PARTNERS 7 It is estimated that 9.4 million individuals will be affected by conflict and disasters in Nigeria including floods, recurrent intercommunal clashes and insurgency/counter-insurgency in the three states where the Government declared a state of emergency. Protection concerns in the context of these complex dynamics include but are not limited to: threats to life and freedom of movement, forced evictions, violence against women and children, children affected by armed conflict and arbitrary arrest. The displacement caused by flooding in 2012 helped draw wide international and national attention to the displacement caused by inter-communal violence and the northern conflict involving insurgents. While incidents of violence are regularly reported in local and national media, data on IDPs is patchy. More information is needed on their situation, their overall needs, response to their plight and gaps in response. In addition, internal displacement in Nigeria is generally addressed as a short-term and humanitarian issue, with minimal resources dedicated to helping people return, integrate locally or settle elsewhere in the country. This lack of focus on durable solutions and the absence of countrywide monitoring mean that only limited information is available on the situation of IDPs beyond the emergency response phase. The protection situation for civilians in the SoE states is a continued source of concern. Armed clashes between anti-government elements and the Joint Task Force (JTF) often result in the death of civilians, including children and women and access to the affected communities is becoming increasingly difficult. This has resulted in the exact number of civilians (including women and children) affected often not being available. It is therefore critical to improve monitoring and reporting of human rights violations in the three SoE states to better understand the situation facing civilians. Armed anti-government elements have also specifically targeted the education system. Human rights groups have reported that between January and September 2013 up to 50 schools may have been attacked, burned or destroyed in the north-east and at least 70 teachers and 100 students have been killed or injured since 2012, causing considerable disruption to education for children in the affected states (Amnesty International 2013). Gender-based violence (GBV) continues to be a cause for concern in Nigeria. Data on the extent of GBV is highly unreliable, due to considerable under reporting of these incidents, especially sexual violence which attracts victim stigmatisation. According to the Nigerian Demographic and Health Survey (NDHS) conducted in 2008, 28% of women have experienced physical violence since the age of 15 while 15% of women have experienced this during the preceding 12 months. During crises, mechanisms for physical and social protection may be weakened or destroyed. The work of the police, legal assistance, access to health, education, and other social services are often disrupted and for those who become displaced these services may not be available anymore. Although there is no specific analysis available on the impact of disasters on GBV prevalence and response in Nigeria, data from other countries shows that GBV incidents increase and response mechanisms are weakened. Therefore addressing GBV from the earliest stages of any emergency is a basic lifesaving and protection issue. It is also expected that with the upcoming elections in 2015 new challenges will emerge and affect the human rights situation in the country. Political violence is expected to intensify as the political battle to control the Presidency deepens. Since Nigeria became a democratic nation in 1999, every election has been marred by violence and accusations of election irregularities. The 2011 elections left more than 800 persons dead after sporadic riots broke 42 Nigeria STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN out following the announcement of election results. There are growing worries that the divisions within the ruling party will lead to more intense political battles for the victory in the 2015 elections. Interactions with a wide range of stakeholders including actors in the field indicate limited awareness on humanitarian protection principles leading to gaps in effective protection planning and response. The sector will therefore work as a matter of priority to advocate for the integration of these principles in humanitarian planning, assessment and response. Improving the monitoring, reporting and response of human rights violations, especially as they relate to children in the context of armed conflict, will also be undertaken to better understand the situation in the north-east and inform an advocacy campaign to reduce these violations. The establishment of such a system will provide the information necessary to guide programme design for the protection of children. Generated information will also serve as an early warning for any crisis enabling prompt and relevant programmatic interventions. STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE 1: Track and analyse risk and vulnerability, integrating findings into humanitarian and development programming. Joint Humanitarian Priority #1 Natural disasters Activity Locations Flood affected areas Mapping and analysing vulnerability as it relates to protection in natural disaster prone communities focusing on boys, girls and women, in order to improve response plan Areas prone to natural disasters Ensure the integration of the principles of protection, including Age, Gender and Diversity (AGD) in all sectors of humanitarian planning, assessment and response. Output Indicator Number of communities assessed Cluster/ Sector Partner Mid-2014 target End-2014 target All sectors % of sector plans All sectors which are AGD 100% sensitive % of interagency assessments conducted which have a protection component integrated 100% 100% 100% Mid-2014 target End-2014 target Joint Humanitarian Priority #2 Conflict Activity Locations Northeast, conflict Mapping and analysing affected areas vulnerability as it relates to protection of armed conflict prone communities focusing on boys, girls, women, in order to improve response Output Indicator Cluster/ Sector Partner Number of affected All sectors communities (including IDPs and host communities) assessed 43 STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN Nigeria Activity Locations Output Indicator Development of human/child rights monitoring and reporting mechanisms in the situation of armed conflict Northeast, conflict affected areas Child rights specific PSWG, monitoring Health, mechanism Justice developed (y/n) Cluster/ Sector Partner Mid-2014 target End-2014 target Yes Yes Monitoring and reporting mechanism is operated by trained human rights actors (y/n) Yes Monthly rights violations report/trend analysis available for programmatic use (y/n) Yes Support evidence-informed Northeast, conflict advocacy using the data affected areas generated from the abovementioned monitoring and reporting mechanisms in order to reduce violations. Number of PSWG evidence-informed specific advocacy activities carried out Ensure the integration of the Northeast, conflict principles of protection, affected areas including Age, Gender and Diversity (AGD) in all sectors of humanitarian planning, assessment and response. Number of sector All sectors plans which are AGD sensitive Number of interagency assessments conducted which have a protection integrated STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE 2: Support vulnerable populations to better cope with shocks by responding earlier to warning signals, by reducing post-crisis recovery times and by building capacity of national actors. Joint Humanitarian Priority #2 Conflict Activity Locations Advocacy and technical support North-East, conflict affected areas for improving standards, procedures, legal framework and specific policy in the area of IDP 44 Output Indicator Cluster/ Sector Partner Draft Policy adopted PSWG (y/n) Number of Mid-2014 target End-2014 target Yes Nigeria Activity STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN Locations Output Indicator Cluster/ Sector Partner management advocacy/awareness raising workshops on the IDP legal framework and draft policy In partnership with North-East, conflict Governments, communities affected areas and development actors, address the potential root causes of conflict focusing on preventive actions and peace building activities Number of peace dialogues facilitated Mid-2014 target End-2014 target PSWG Number of trainers in conflict resolution and peace building trained STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE 3: Deliver coordinated and integrated life-saving assistance to people affected by emergencies. Joint Humanitarian Priority #1 Natural Disaster Activity Locations Areas prone to Advocate for protection principles being integrated into natural disasters the delivery of life saving assistance for disaster-affected people Output Indicator Cluster/ Sector Partner Mid-2014 target End-2014 target Mid-2014 target End-2014 target Number of sector All sectors plans which are AGD sensitive Joint Humanitarian Priority #2 Conflict Activity Locations Output Indicator Cluster/ Sector Partner Advocate for the integration of the North-East, conflict principles of protection, including affected areas Age, Gender and Diversity (AGD) in all sectors of humanitarian response. Number of sector plans which are AGD sensitive All sectors Development of and support for North-East, conflict age- and gender-responsive case affected areas management system to support persons affected by violence, exploitation and abuse Number of persons (disaggregated by age and gender) referred to support services (including health, social Health, education, livelihood cluster, MWASD, police, 45 STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN Activity Locations Training of health workers and medical professionals on clinical North-East, conflict management of sexual violence affected areas victims Establishment of Child Friendly North-East, conflict Spaces including the provision of affected areas psychosocial services for children Nigeria Output Indicator Cluster/ Sector Partner welfare and legal aid) justice Curriculum on Health clinical cluster management of sexual violence victims developed (y/n) Number of Child Friendly Spaces established Number of children (disaggregated by gender and age) accessing Child Friendly Spaces WATER SANITATION AND HYGIENE 46 Education cluster Mid-2014 target End-2014 target Nigeria STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN Lead agency: Ministry of Health and UNICEF Contact information: Adili Amatontu amatontu@unicef.org PEOPLE IN NEED PEOPLE TARGETED REQUIREMENTS (US$) 4.6 million 2 million 11 million # OF PARTNERS 5 Access to potable water in Nigeria is about 58.5% while access to basic Sanitation and Hygiene is 32% (Multi Indicator Cluster Survey 2012). During the flood disaster, the majority of water facilities were destroyed thereby reducing access to potable water. According to a PDNA report, damage to water facilities in the 2012 flood disaster was estimated at N12.9 billion. The report also highlighted a general indication of reduced access to water for drinking and domestic use as flood victims had to travel longer distances and spend more time collecting water after the disaster. In early 2013, the Nigerian Meteorological Agency Seasonal Rainfall Prediction (SRP) indicated that high rainfall leading to flooding was to be expected in some parts of the country. The 2013 Annual Flood Outlook (AFO) released by the Nigerian Hydrological Services Agency (NIHSA), confirmed NIMET’s forecast. The AFO revealed that apart from Ekiti, Enugu, Katsina, Imo, Abia States and Federal Capital Territory (FCT), all other states in Nigeria were likely to experience significant flooding in 2013. With regard to river flooding, the most affected areas were expected to be in the Komadugu Yobe Basin and the Niger and Benue troughs. In areas affected by the previous season's floods, poor households are still in the process of recovering their livelihoods. WASH issues are still very critical in these areas, poor access to clean water, hygiene and sanitation is still very common, making the affected population susceptible to water-borne diseases like cholera, diarrhoea or malaria. Lead poisoning and oil pollution in Zamfara State and Niger Delta area respectively are responsible for the contamination of domestic water sources of the communities around the affected areas. Addressing this also requires provision of access to clean water as a way of preventing the disaster. Sanitary facilities for affected people are also impacted. Analysis of the toilet facilities used by the respondents before and after the disaster showed that the situation worsened as a result of the flood disaster. The survey indicated that in Anambra, Imo, Kogi, Niger and Jigawa states the proportion of households that used household toilets declined while open defecation increased. This situation was likely to apply across all the states impacted by the flood. Furthermore, use of other sanitary facilities such as soap, detergents, water and sanitary napkins became inadequate in the aftermath of the disaster. There is a continued need for humanitarian assistance to those displaced by the floods, as well as those populations whose access to safe water and sanitation services was reduced by the effects of flooding in their communities. Beyond the humanitarian relief and preparedness responses, there is a need for sustainable intervention putting in place flood mitigation measures which will include building of organizational capacity and coordination for early warning and response. Such flood mitigation measures will include construction of flood-proof water sources and catchment treatments on micro water shed basis. Cumulatively from weeks 1-48, 2013, at least 4,390 suspected cholera cases were reported with 151 deaths from 18 LGAs. A priority is to strengthen the cholera monitoring and response mechanisms primarily through the FMoH and FMoWR. Strategies would include provision of water quality testing kits and training for SMoHs and RUWASAs to plan, implement and sustain a coherent water quality testing regime and to build capacity to respond early to contain outbreaks. Improvement in water quality, latrine coverage and hygiene behaviour are essential 47 STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN Nigeria components of cholera response and such activities would use schools and health facilities as entry points to the wider community where water treatment at household level would be a focus area. According to WHO, nutritional status is compromised where people are exposed to high levels of infection due to unsafe and insufficient water supply and inadequate sanitation. In secondary malnutrition, people suffering from diarrhoea will not benefit fully from food because frequent stools prevent adequate absorption of nutrients. Moreover, those who are already experiencing protein-energy malnutrition are more susceptible to, and less able to recover from, infectious diseases. Nigeria has the second highest acute malnutrition burden in the world. Malnutrition is a major health problem, especially in the 8 Sahelian states of northern Nigeria where about 367,000 children were reached through the Community-based Management of Acute Malnutrition (CMAM) programme as of November 2013. Natural disasters and conflicts, by damaging water infrastructure and contaminating supplies, contribute to increased malnutrition and an increased risk of death especially among children under five due to frequent cases of infection and high rates of malnutrition. STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE 1: Track and analyse risk and vulnerability, integrating findings into humanitarian and development programming Joint Humanitarian Priority #1 – Natural disasters Activity Locations Output Indicator Cluster/ Sector Partner Mid-2014 target End-2014 target Support to national authorities 6 geo-political zones for data collection and analysis on access to water and sanitation Number of areas with All humanitarian organizations' operations with available data on access to water and sanitation, is available 200 500 Promoting the creation of local Affected Areas water commission or other consultative bodies including the most vulnerable users Number of All consultative bodies (local water commission or committee, etc.) created that include the most vulnerable users at the decisionmaking level (potentially from project steering committees, maintenance committees, etc.) 99 99 Identification and mapping of 6 geo-political areas at risk for disasters zones (floods in the first place ) Number Of areas All covered by floodplain mapping available 6 6 Joint Humanitarian Priority #2 – Malnutrition 48 Nigeria STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN Activity Locations Output Indicator Cluster/ Sector Partner Mid-2014 target End-2014 target Support to national authorities 6 Geo-political zones for data collection and analysis on access to water and sanitation Number of areas with All humanitarian organizations' operations with available data on access to water and sanitation, is available 2 Identification of areas and the most vulnerable population to malnutrition, and joint analysis WASH/ malnutrition / aggravating factors link to the WASH sector (diarrhea) Number of areas with All joint analysis focusing on population most at risk of malnutrition for which WASH actions can be conducted as a priority 14 20 Integration of hygiene promotion in key family practices in school curricula Number of schools integrating hygiene and sanitation promotion in their curricula 2500 3000 All 6 Joint Humanitarian Priority #3 - Conflict Activity Locations Mid-2014 target End-2014 target Number of areas with WASH humanitarian organizations' operations with available data on access to water and sanitation, is available 2 6 Promoting the creation Affected Areas Number of WASH of local water consultative bodies commission or other (local water consultative bodies commission or including the most committee, etc.) vulnerable users created that include the most vulnerable users at the decision-making level (potentially from project steering committees, maintenance committees, etc.) 5 10 Support to national 6 Geo-political authorities for data zones collection and analysis on access to water and sanitation Output Indicator Cluster Sector/ Partner 49 STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN Nigeria Joint Humanitarian Priority #4 – Epidemics Activity Locations Output Indicator Cluster/ Sector Partner Mid-2014 target End-2014 target Support to national authorities 6 Geo-political zones for data collection and analysis on access to water and sanitation Number of areas with All humanitarian organizations' operations with available data on access to water and sanitation, is available 2 6 Capitalisation / lessons learned Affected Areas with local and / or national Number of areas covered by a capitalization/lessons learned exercise organized with local and / or national authorities All 6 12 Identification and mapping of areas , populations, behaviours and high risk period for cholera transmission Number areas with joint WASH/Health analysis targeting the population most atrisk of cholera, for which priority WASH actions can be conducted All 10 20 STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE 2: Support vulnerable populations to better cope with shocks by responding earlier to warning signals, by reducing post-crisis recovery times and by building capacity of national actors Joint Humanitarian Priority #1 – Natural Disasters Activity Locations Output Indicator Cluster/ Sector Partner Mid-2014 target End-2014 target Taking into consideration access to water and sanitation during site planning Number of planned All reception sites identified in the contingency plan explicitly taking account of access to water resources and sanitation 1000 2000 Flooding contingency plan, including rapid response capabilities WASH ( HR inputs , seasonal reinforcement) Number of agencies All involved in the development of a multisectoral contingency plan that is 200 200 50 Nigeria Activity STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN Locations Output Indicator Cluster/ Sector Partner Mid-2014 target End-2014 target Cluster/ Sector Partner Mid-2014 target End-2014 target 4000 6000 regularly updated and that includes simulation exercise Joint Humanitarian Priority #3 - Conflict Activity Locations Output Indicator For communities and the most vulnerable groups, systematize the key steps in "participatory decision " in humanitarian or development projects Number of people All benefited from a project's key milestones of "participatory decision-making" of communities and the most vulnerable groups Contingency plan , including rapid response capabilities WASH ( HR inputs) Number of All agencies involved in the development of a multisectoral contingency plan that is regularly updated and that includes simulation exercise Rehabilitation of access to WASH services (schools , health centres ) in areas of return Number of schools All with functional WASH services in the areas of return Number of health centres with functional WASH services in the areas of return 2000 4000 Output Indicator Mid-2014 target End-2014 target 200 200 Joint Humanitarian Priority #4 - Epidemics Activity Contingency plan for the fight against cholera / malaria , including rapid response capabilities WASH / Health (RH , inputs , seasonal reinforcement) Locations Cluster/ Sector Partner Number of All agencies involved in the development of a multisectoral contingency plan that is regularly updated and that includes simulation 200 200 51 STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN Activity Locations Nigeria Output Indicator Cluster/ Sector Partner Mid-2014 target End-2014 target 100 200 exercise Sustainable WASH strategies in urban and rural areas at risk for cholera Number of cholera All high-risk areas where sustainable WASH strategies are put in place to protect vulnerable populations Addressing the humanitarian impact of Food insecurity STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE 3: Deliver coordinated and integrated life-saving assistance to people affected by emergencies. Joint Humanitarian Priority # 1 – Natural Disasters Activity Locations Output Indicator Consult women and girls at all stages of the project. Have special attention with regard to the design and location of water points, showers and toilets to reduce the waiting time and incidents of violence. Ensure that the evaluation teams and translation include female staff. Number of women spending less than 20 minutes to collect water/queuing Create hygiene promotion activities targeting both women AND men. Cluster/ Sector Partner All Mid-2014 target End-2014 target 10000 20000 Number of girls spending less than 20 minutes to collect water/queuing All 5000 10000 Number of boys spending less than 20 minutes to collect water/queuing All 2000 4000 Number of women having improved knowledge on water and hygiene related diseases All 20000 40000 10000 20000 50 50 All Number of men having improved knowledge on water and hygiene related diseases Establish mechanism for monitoring and evaluation of cluster/sector group performance its interaction with 52 Number of WASH cluster members satisfied with the functioning of the WASH Cluster and its All Nigeria Activity STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN Locations Output Indicator Cluster/ Sector Partner Mid-2014 target End-2014 target other sectors interaction with the other Clusters/Sectors in the preparedness for and response to crises Access to water and sanitation programmes for the affected populations at community level Number of affected All population with access to safe drinking water (Global WASH Cluster W 2-4) 1m 2m WASH functional package of activities in displacement sites Number girls using All minimum functional WASH package (water drunk drinking , culturally appropriate safe hygienic defecation with separation type , key inputs with hygiene promotion ) All Number boys using minimum functional WASH package (water drunk drinking , culturally appropriate safe hygienic defecation with separation type , key inputs with hygiene promotion ) 10000 20000 50000 100000 Output Indicator Mid-2014 target End-2014 target Joint Humanitarian Priority # 3 - Conflict Activity Locations Cluster/ Sector Partner Monitoring and evaluation on functionality of WASH package (residual chlorine, VIP latrines etc.) involving the most vulnerable Number of people who All have benefited from a project involving the most vulnerable people in the monitoring and evaluation of the functionality of a WASH package (residual chlorine, VIP latrines etc.) 1m 2m Create hygiene promotion activities targeting both women AND men. Number of women having improved knowledge on water and hygiene related diseases 12 24 WASH 53 STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN Activity Mid-2014 target End-2014 target Number of men having WASH improved knowledge on water and hygiene related diseases 12 24 Construction of sanitation facilities in emergency affected communities Number of affected WASH population (disaggregated by sex and age) using sanitary latrines 5000 10000 “Safe access to drinking water" activities in WASH programmes in displacement sites Number of drinking WASH water sources with safe access 150 300 Functional package WASH in displacement sites, host communities / villages (drinking water, culturally appropriated hygienic defecation with safe gender separation, key inputs with hygiene promotion) Number girls using WASH minimum functional WASH package (water drunk drinking , culturally appropriate safe hygienic defecation with separation type , key inputs with hygiene promotion) 300,000 500,000 Number boys using WASH minimum functional WASH package (water drunk drinking , culturally appropriate safe hygienic defecation with separation type , key inputs with hygiene promotion) 200,000 400,000 Number women using WASH minimum functional WASH package (water drunk drinking , culturally appropriate safe hygienic defecation with separation type , key inputs with hygiene promotion) 350,000 700,000 Number men using WASH minimum functional WASH package (water drunk drinking , culturally appropriate safe hygienic defecation 170,000 340,000 54 Locations Nigeria Output Indicator Cluster/ Sector Partner Nigeria Activity STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN Locations Output Indicator Cluster/ Sector Partner Mid-2014 target End-2014 target Number of women satisfied with their access to services, facilities, water and sanitation made WASH 250,000 500,000 Number of men satisfied with their access to services, facilities, water and sanitation made WASH 150,000 300,000 Output Indicator Cluster/Sector Mid-2014 End-2014 Partner target target with separation type , key inputs with hygiene promotion) Train women and men in the areas of building, operationalization and maintenance of all types of water and sanitation facilities: including wells, pumps, water tanks, distribution systems, toilets and showers. Joint Humanitarian Priority # 4 - Epidemics Activity Locations Monitoring and evaluation on functionality of WASH package (residual chlorine, VIP latrines etc.) involving the most vulnerable Number of people who WASH have benefited from a project involving the most vulnerable people in the monitoring and evaluation of the functionality of a WASH package (residual chlorine, VIP latrines etc.) 6 12 Create hygiene promotion activities targeting both women AND men. Number of women having improved knowledge on water and hygiene related diseases WASH 20 50 WASH 1 2 Number of men having improved knowledge on water and hygiene related diseases Establish mechanism for monitoring and evaluation of cluster/sector group performance its interaction with Number of WASH cluster members satisfied with the functioning of the WASH Cluster and its 55 STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN Activity Locations Nigeria Output Indicator Cluster/Sector Mid-2014 End-2014 Partner target target other sectors interaction with the other Clusters/Sectors in the preparedness for and response to crises In collaboration with healthcare stakeholders , gathering, investigation and analysis of WASH/epidemiology data supporting WASH response orientation Number of areas WASH where, since from the outbreak beginning of the epidemic, epidemiological data on cholera is analysed and used to guide the response of WASH actors 56 24 40 Nigeria STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN ANNEX: FINANCEMENT REQUIS Table I: Requirements per cluster Strategic Response Plan for Nigeria 2014 as of 31 January 2014 Requirements ($) Cluster COORDINATION AND SUPPORT SERVICES 8,078,433 EARLY RECOVERY 8,050,000 EDUCATION 6,580,361 EMERGENCY SHELTER AND NFI 4,500,000 FOOD SECURITY 10,683,159 HEALTH 19,944,745 NUTRITION 2,333,666 PROTECTION 2,752,831 WATER AND SANITATION 11,937,502 Grand Total 74,860,697 Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by appealing organizations. Table II: Requirements per priority level Strategic Response Plan for Nigeria 2014 as of 31 January 2014 Priority High Medium Grand Total Requirements ($) 70,134,199 2,950,000 73,084,199 Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by appealing organizations. 57 STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN Nigeria Table III: Requirements per organization Strategic Response Plan for Nigeria 2014 as of 31 January 2014 Appealing Organization ACF - USA 1,083,026 CCFN 6,696,745 FAO 2,650,000 IOM 9,900,000 IRC 5,130,243 OCHA 1,354,834 OXFAM Netherlands (NOVIB) 7,108,060 UNDP 8,050,000 UNFPA 4,212,498 UNICEF 24,033,126 WANEP-Nigeria 200,000 WaterAid 1,692,165 WHO 2,750,000 Grand Total Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by appealing organizations. 58 Requirements ($) 74,860,697 Nigeria STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN Table IV: List of Appeal projects (grouped by cluster) Strategic Response Plan for Nigeria 2014 as of 31 January 2014 Project code Title (click on hyperlinked project code to open full project details) Appealing agency Requirements ($) Priority COORDINATION AND SUPPORT SERVICES Capacity Development and support for linking NGA-14/CSS/66393/5362 States and local NGOs/CSOs for Sub-National Humanitarian Coordination OXFAM Netherlands (NOVIB) 1,123,599 High 1,354,834 High NGA-14/CSS/66743/119 Humanitarian Coordination and Advocacy in Nigeria OCHA NGA14/CSS/66910/16502 Early warning/ information management system for humanitarian response in Nigeria. WANEPNigeria NGA-14/CSS/67241/298 Strengthening Camp Coordination and Camp Management (CCCM) Framework for IDPs in Nigeria IOM Sub total for COORDINATION AND SUPPORT SERVICES 200,000 High 5,400,000 High 8,078,433 EARLY RECOVERY NGA-14/ER/66902/776 Strengthening Disaster Risk Management and Recovery in Nigeria UNDP 5,100,000 High NGA-14/ER/67193/776 Livelihood and Early Recovery Interventions for population affected by conflict in in North Easter Nigeria UNDP 2,950,000 Medium Sub total for EARLY RECOVERY 8,050,000 EDUCATION NGA-14/E/66968/124 Education intervention on access and continued schooling for children and adolescents in Emergency- proned Nigerian communities. UNICEF Sub total for EDUCATION 6,580,361 High 6,580,361 EMERGENCY SHELTER AND NFI NGA-14/S-NF/65657/298 Protection and Emergency Assistance to IDPs in Nigeria IOM Sub total for EMERGENCY SHELTER AND NFI 4,500,000 High 4,500,000 FOOD SECURITY NGA-14/A/65857/5362 Emergency Food Security and Livelihood intervention for Nigerian communities in the Sahel Region OXFAM Netherlands (NOVIB) NGA-14/A/66275/14005 Emergency Food Security and livelihoods program for the most vulnerable population affected by ACF - USA insurgency in Yobe State, Northern Nigeria 1,083,026 High NGA-14/A/66362/16475 Enhancing Food Security in Northern Nigeria CCFN 2,742,170 High NGA-14/A/67024/123 Promotion of Food-based interventons to improve diet quality to overcome and prevent malnutrition and nutritional deficiencies especially in children. FAO 4,207,963 High 850,000 High 59 STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN Project code Nigeria Title (click on hyperlinked project code to open full project details) NGA-14/A/67029/123 Introducing Conservationn Agriculture techniques and use of high yielding drought resistant crop varieties to farming communities. Appealing agency FAO Sub total for FOOD SECURITY Requirements ($) Priority 1,800,000 High 10,683,159 HEALTH NGA-14/H/65992/1171 Building Resilience of Northern States Bordering the Sahelian Countries UNFPA 4,212,498 High NGA-14/H/66368/124 Emergency Primary Health Care Convergence intervention (Health, Nutrition and WASH water and sanitation) for Sahelian northern states in Nigeria UNICEF 12,982,247 High NGA-14/H/67011/122 Reinforcing preparedness and emergency response to epidemic-prone diseases(Cholera and WHO Lassa fever) in high risk states of Nigeria. 1,205,000 High NGA-14/H/67091/122 Nutritional sentinel surveillance in Sahelian states of Nigeria to monitor the humanitarian impact of malnutrition among children under-five 1,545,000 High WHO Sub total for HEALTH 19,944,745 NUTRITION NGA-14/H/66113/5179 Emergency Nutrition and Health Services for Conflict Affected Persons in Adamawa State IRC Sub total for NUTRITION 2,333,666 High 2,333,666 PROTECTION NGA-14/P-HRRL/66104/5179 Emergency protection monitoring and training for conflict-affected communities in northern Adamawa State NGA-14/P-HRRL/66898/124 Strengthening and expanding the monitoring, reporting & response on children’s rights violations UNICEF in conflict in Northern Nigeria IRC Sub total for PROTECTION 1,383,231 High 1,369,600 High 2,752,831 WATER AND SANITATION NGA-14/WS/65881/5362 Emergency WASH intervention for food insecure Nigerian communities in the Sahel Region OXFAM Netherlands (NOVIB) 1,776,498 High NGA-14/WS/66109/5179 Provision of WASH activities, services and facilities for conflict-affected persons in northern Adamawa State IRC 1,413,346 High NGA-14/WS/66803/14538 Provision of WASH facilities for conflict and flood WaterAid prone areas in Bauchi, Plateau, Benue and Jigawa 1,692,165 High NGA-14/WS/66889/124 Cholera Preparedness and Response 3,100,918 High NGA-14/WS/66924/16475 Promoting WASH Intervention in 4 Sahelian State CCFN in North Western Nigeria UNICEF 3,954,575 High Sub total for WATER AND SANITATION 11,937,502 Grand Total 74,860,697 Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by appealing organizations. 60 Nigeria STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN Table V: Requirements per gender marker score Strategic Response Plan for Nigeria 2014 as of 31 January 2014 Gender marker Requirements ($) 2a-The project is designed to contribute significantly to gender equality 74,860,697 Grand Total 74,860,697 Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by appealing organizations. 61