Resolution 81

advertisement
1
[DISCUSSION DRAFT]
81ST SESSION
2013-2014
S. RES. 81- ##
IN SUPPORT OF THE DEAN’S FUTURE SCHOLARS PROGRAM GETTING A PERMANENT
LOUNGE ON CAMPUS
_______________________________
IN THE SENATE OF THE ASSOCIATED STUDENTS
_______________________________
OCTOBER 22, 2013
SUBMITTED BY SENATOR OLMOS TO THE COMMITTEE ON ACADEMICS
_______________________________
A Resolution
In Support of the Dean’s Future Scholars Program Getting a Permanent Lounge on Campus
1
Whereas, University of Nevada’s mission statement emphasizes four main points: (1) Prepares
2
graduates to compete in a global environment; (2) Creates new knowledge; (3) Improves economic
3
and social development; and (4) Respects and seeks the diversity of the citizens of Nevada.
4
Whereas, Dean’s Future Scholars (DFS) “empowers low-income, first generation students to
5
graduate high school and achieve higher education by fostering long-term relationships and
6
equipping students with the knowledge, skills, and support in order for them to become responsible
7
and productive citizens” (Dean’s Future Scholars, 2013).
2
1
Whereas, Campbell and Campbell (1997) stated that students in a mentoring program were
2
retained at a higher rate than students not in a mentoring program and Salinitiri (2005) found that
3
participation in a mentoring program has a positive influence on at-risk student persistence;
4
Whereas, the DFS program selects Washoe County School District (WCSD) students initially
5
in the 6th grade and mentors them through middle and high school in hopes of each student
6
enrolling into an institution of higher learning. This early intervention builds a long-term relationship
7
between the students and the DFS staff creating a sense of family, loyalty, dedication, and a drive to
8
achieve an advanced degree;
9
Whereas, since 2000, DFS has encouraged over 650 low-income first generation students to
10
challenge themselves and achieve their dreams, while building a successful track record of
11
outperforming the overall WCSD high school graduation rates. For example, in 2012, DFS’s
12
graduation rate was at 85%, compared to the WCSD’s graduation rate of 69%, of which the
13
graduation rate for low-income WCSD students was only 56%;
14
Whereas, “many first-generation students had no or low aspirations for going to college prior to
15
participating in pre-college programs” (Engle et al., 2006), hence the DFS program intervenes with
16
this student population at a young age so then those students know that college is a possibility;
17
Whereas, Tinto (1993) argued that it was beneficial for students to engage in “anticipatory
18
socialization” or preparation of integration into the college social system prior to entering college (p.
19
98). Findings indicated that the “DFS program appeared to provide a wide array of pathways
20
including mentoring, summer programs, and the lounge for transition” (Beattie, 2013, p. 115).
21
Whereas, findings also indicated that the DFS lounge acts as “a safe haven for the reproduction
22
of social and cultural capital on campus” (Beattie, 2013, p. 117). The lounge not only provides
23
academic support, but it prides itself in which it acts as “a second home where students can eat,
3
1
sleep, study, and interact with other DFS students and staff in a variety of ways” (Beattie, 2013, p.
2
115)
3
Whereas, the lounge was utilized for basic needs, academic help, and emotional support;
4
however, as students persisted in college into the second semester of their sophomore year, usage of
5
the lounge began to decrease indicating that students may have integrated into other aspects of
6
college life.
7
Whereas, academic outreach programs should provide a shared space on campus that can act as
8
a second home for students upon college entrance (Beattie 2013), the DFS lounge keeps paving the
9
way for numerous DFS students to pursue the opportunities of student engagement at the
10
University of Nevada such as clubs and organizations, Greek life, and student government.
11
Whereas, the current DFS 1,500 square foot lounge space within the William Raggio Education
12
building contains 16 computers that have access to internet, printing, and scanning, 24/7 student
13
access to the lounge space, five couches, kitchenette, storage room, office space for professional
14
staff, and sufficient room for DFS students;
15
16
17
18
19
Whereas, the DFS lounge is crucial to the success of the DFS program while aiding the
University’s mission to increase persistence and graduate rates;
Whereas, the Child and Family Research Center will be temporarily relocated to the current
DFS lounge space;
Be it resolved by the Senate of the Associated Students of the University of Nevada, that the DFS program
20
must have a permanent and adequate space on campus to provide continuous support to their
21
students.
22
23
Be it further resolved that this resolution be sent to, Dr. Marc Johnson, President of the University
of Nevada, Reno, Dr. Shannon Ellis, Vice President of Student Services, Dr. Kevin Carmen,
4
1
University Provost, Dr. Kevin Coll, Dean of the College of Education, Ms. Mariluz Garcia, Director
2
of Dean’s Future Scholar, and Ms. Megan Ortiz, Editor-in-Chief of The Nevada Sagebrush.
○
5
References
Campbell, T. A., & Campbell, D. E. (2012). Faculty / Student Mentor Program: Effects on Academic
Performance and Retention. Research in Higher Education, 38(6), 727–742.
Dean’s Future Scholars. (2013). About Us. Retrieved from
http://www.unr.edu/education/centers/dfs/about-us
Engle, J., Bermeo, A., & Obrian, C. (2006). Straight from the source: What works for first-generation college
students? Washington, D.C.: The Pell Institute of the Study of Opportunity in Higher Education.
Salinitri, G. (2012). The Effects of Formal Mentoring on the Retention Rates for First-Year, Low
Achieving Students, Canadian Journal of Education, 28(4).
1
Download