The theory of exchangeability as a tool to build the new architecture of the global monetary system Bayzakov S.-Scientific Director Economic Research Institute PhD., Professor GDP deflator nature in the theory of Friedman-Fischer The existing model of nominal GDP according to official data is the sum of the following: NGDP1 + NGDP2+ NGDP3+ NGDP4 = NGDP. NGDP i = p i *Q i NGDPi is the nominal GDP as defined by the scalar multiplication of the respective deflator - Ρi to their physical volumes – Qi in constant prices NGDP1 is the final NGDP2 - is the NGDP3 - is the NGDP4 – balance consumption by final consumption final consumption on export-import the household by the government on investments operations in sector physical terms Constraints of the monetary theory of Friedman-Fischer for the audit of market economy development sustainability GDP deflator as nominal GDP growth rates divided by real GDP growth rates has no relations to the actual prices of the current year: π(π‘) ππΊπ·ππ‘/ ππΊπ·π0 = (1) π(0) π πΊπ·ππ‘/ π πΊπ·π0 The nature of the deflator stems from the interpretation of the monetarism model which by mathematical methods proves the constraints of the GDP deflator (p(t)) and its inconsistency as a key tool for financial management in real economy development: p(t) x Q(t) = v(t) x M(t). Thus, since NGDP=v*M, it is easy to get the formula of the GDP deflator nature: NGDPt/ NGDP0 pt Mt /M0 vt = * = p0 Q t /Q 0 v0 RGDPt/ RGDP0 (2) «Notice, - confirm our conclusion Saks and Laren – that we calculate the index indirectly. We first take the nominal GDP (NGDP) in current prices, then find the real RGDP in constant prices, i.Π΅. Q= RGDP. So the price deflator calculated this way is sometimes called a revealed price deflator of GDP» [Saks J.D., Laren F.B. Macroeconomics, - M: Delo, 1996. P54]. GDP deflator nature in the theory of duality by Kantorovich Koopmans GDP deflator serves as a financial regulator in the model of joint tasks by Kantorovich-Koopmans which in a general case is reflected as follows: Qt x pt = ct x Xt . (3) ct - is the coefficient of money velocity efficiency which expresses the contribution of scientifric and technical progress (STP) to the real economy. Xt - is the output from national accounts. After the slight transformation the formula (3) is provided as an index of GDP deflator measurement: ππ‘ π /π = π‘ 0 , (4) π0 Where ππ0 ππ0 = ππ‘ /π0 ππ‘ /π0 πππ‘ /ππ0 means change in money purchasing power growth Constraints of the theory of duality by Kantorovich Koopmans for audit of sustainability in market economy growth Constraints of the theory of duality by Kantorovich Koopmans for audit of sustainability in economy growth is explained by excessive mathematic form of interface for dual estimations as the prices of scarce resources as production inputs. As seen from formula (4), the GDP deflator inside it is the efficiency coefficient of the money velocity divided by money purchasing power. That means here constraints of the theory of duality by Kantorovich Koopmans is narrowing the economic contents of the task to manage the real economy and excessive use of quantitative methods of analysis. But the theory of duality developed by American mathematician Koopmans and Soviet academic Kantorovich is the universal mathematic tool for analysis of economy and monetary system. This mathematic tool is independent of ideological, political, and social context of society. R.Benzel, being the member of the Sweden Royal Academy of Sciences on the ceremony of Nobel prize winners Kantorovich Koopmans in 1975 pronounced the key words yet not thought through and realized: “the main economic problems are identical in all the societies”, and the whole bunch of similar scientific problems can be investigated in its pure shape, independent of political organization of the society where they are developed”. Exchangeability theory – the base tool for market economy liberalization In the formula (4) acquired after scientific rethinking of the GDP deflator nature in the theory of duality by Kantorovich Koopmans we see the unity of two mutually independent indicator for economy management. One of them is the coefficient of scientific-technological risk of entrepreneurs in the real sector - Ρ(t), the other one – money purchasing power in the monetary system - pp(t). One of them expresses the quality of the performance in the real sector, the other one – in the financial sector. The principle of mutual exchangeability of money and prices for goods and services is formulated as follows: Multiple of money purchasing power index pp(t) on GDP growth rates in nominal terms prices (i1) equal the multiple of economy progress Ρ(t) on real growth rates (i2) : pp(t) x i1 = c(t) x i2 (5) This is the basic rule of economy development which is unique in the world and supports overall liberalization of market economy and on the basis of labor productivity and capital growth. The Roadmap for justification of economic laws that allow to define the prices Step1. estimating the progress in economy found by the coefficient Ρ(t): c(t)= GDP/(QP+GDP) Where GDP – GDP in current prices, QP – the cost of materials used for its production. The sum QP+GDP = Π₯ is the output from national accounts. Step2. Index of real economy growth via money purchasing power, in Kazakh interpretation is counted under the new formula (i3*), i3* = c(t) x i2. Index of real economy growth via money purchasing power is found with account of scientific-technological risk/stimulus as multiple of real output growth rates and scientific-technical progress coefficient. Step3. The replacement of growth index i2 by the similar index i1/Ρ(t) allows to get a new real growth rate index i3*: i3* = c(t) x i1 / Ρ(t) =ΡΡ(t) x i1 This money purchasing power indicator pp(t) has no analogues in the world and is defined on the basis of the growth rates i1 and i2, which shape the frame of the GDP. GDP deflator nature in the theory of exchangeability of money cost and prices for goods and services The targeted index of prices for goods and services and, accordingly, the answer to the question by A.Marshall “what defines the equilibrium price of goods” is found as the inverse of money purchasing power: 1/pp(t) = i1 / (c(t) x i2). Inflation index (GDP deflator) is the scientific-technical progress coefficient divided by money purchasing power: p(t) = c(t) / pp(t) = i1 / i2. Estimation of the net growth of the scientific-technical progress coefficient: dc(t) = c(t) – 100%. The scope of main formulas in practice of market economy management 1. To estimate the coefficient of scientific-technologic progress: c(t) = CDP / (QP+GDP). 2. To estimate money purchasing power: pp(t) = (c(t) x i2) / i1 3. To estimate prices for G&S: 1 / pp(t) = i1 / (c(t) x i2) 4. To estimate real economy growth: i3 = pp x i1, ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ i3 = c(t) x i2 5. To estimate the GDP deflator: Ρ(t) = Ρ(t) / ΡΡ(t) 6. To estimate the net growth of scientific-technologic progress coefficient : dc(t) = c(t) – 100%. The model of world reserve currency by IMF developed through purchasing powers of national currencies Since on each country through purchasing powers of national currencies is known, then using basics of SDR calculation we have the following: PP(Π‘ΠΠ , t ) ο½ ο₯i ο½1 NGDP(i) /[ pp(1) * NGDP(1) ο« pp(2) * NGDP(2) ο« ... ο« pp(n) * NGDP(n)], i ο½n Where n stands for the quantity of countries trade partners Calculation of SDR in 2000-2010 on 35 countries (CIS, BRIC, ΠΠ‘ 27, USA and Japan) is given an the table below: NGDP, USD bn. 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 100,0 99,8 104,0 116,7 130,1 138,5 148,8 165,8 179,7 175,2 200,9 RGDP, USD bn. PPP 100,0 99,1 102,2 106,0 108,2 106,7 108,5 112,6 114,6 120,4 128,7 SDR calculation, % 100,0 100,8 101,8 110,0 120,2 129,8 137,2 147,3 156,8 145,6 156,1 As seen from the table, the growth rates of nominal GDP on these 35 countries is 201%, whereas the real growth -128,7%. The calculated rate of SDR in US dollars grew to 156% what is equivalent to USD purchasing power up to ΠΎ 0.64 SDR. The comparative analysis of economic growth in Kazakhstan and Germany in 2000-2008, 2000=100% GDP deflator from official statistics Economic growth from official statistics Scientific progress contribution, % Real growth index of prices for G&S Economic growth through purchasing power of currencies Kazakhstan 358,0 203,8 +9,5 327,0 223,0 Germany 168 111 -9 184 106 The example shows that even the advanced countries having the high-tech production, may fall captured by negative aggregate contributions of the invested inputs and organization of scientific progress management. This is shown by +9.5% and -9% contribution of STP in Kazakhstan and Germany respectively. In 2008 as per 2000 prices. As a result, the real economic growth rate under the purchasing power of money in Kazakhstan was 223,0% against 203,8% according to official statistics. In case of Germany the real economic growth rate was 106% against 111 %. Roadmap for estimation of STP impact on appreciation of regional currencies The example above is not the exception for a couple of countries. Current growth rates of world economy after 2010 confirm that the previous decade’s tempo is still preserved. It is seen from the analysis of 35 countries during the period of economic crisis from the net growth of the coefficient Ρ(t)%-100%. What gives hope in it is just the tempos of the net growth in the development of economies of G35, BRIC, Japan and USA in 2005-2010, which we provide below (2000=100%): 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 CES (RUS-KZ-BEL) 2 2 1 0 -1 0 BRIC ΠΠ‘ 27 G35 USA Japan Great Britain Germany France -2 -3 -2 1 -8 -2 -1 -3 0 -4 -3 1 -13 1 -4 -4 3 -4 -3 0 -10 0 -4 -3 1 -3 -2 -1 0 3 -9 -4 13 -4 3 8 2 -23 -2 -1 32 -2 7 4 12 -4 -6 -2 Liberal market economy – the acknowledged necessity The model of monetarism is constrained by the growth of GDP deflator in real economy: Qt x pt = vt x Mt . But this growth may be originating from the speculations in the monetary system The model by Kantorovich-Koopmans is constrained by objectively conditioned estimates: Qt x pt = Ρt x Π₯t . But this growth in prices may be originating in excessive operational costs of production. The model of mutual exchangeability of money and prices for G&S is free from constraints: Ρt x RGDPt=ppt x NGDPt . Liberal market economy becomes the acknowledged necessity: both sectors of economy are interested in growing efficiency of their functioning, these interests are not contradictory but mutually supportive. The theory of exchangeability – the most progressive generation of models for real economy management As already shown, both the monetarism model: Qt x pt = vt x Mt , and duality model: Qt x pt = Ρt x Π₯t are not the adequate models providing sustainable development of real economy. The problems of monetary system development are solved by use in a model of real economy development of the third dimension – growth rates of economy based on the new formula of GDP deflator which reflects the changes in real economy and changes in the monetary system: ππ‘ ππ‘ /π0 = π0 πππ‘ /ππ0 The final new model of sustainable development in real economy received by “crossing” of the monetary model by Friedman-Fischer and duality principle by Kantorovich-Koopmans is written as follows: Ρt x RGDPt=ppt x NGDPt Or the formula of money cost exchangeability and prices for G&S where the GDP deflator in the concealed shape is presented as the efficiency of real sector and financial sector performance: Ρ x I2= pp x I1 If William Petti told that “the labor is father of wealth, the land is its mother”, then we can say” “the duality principle is the father of the scientific management and the monetarism model is its mother”.