Introduction to Critical Exploration – example Eggs & Chickens Critical Exploration Pedagogy in Science Education through the lens of the structure of an elementary education graduate class (EEDUC 5135) Begin by looking at eggs (because they embody many complex scientific concepts, they are common, most people have prior experiences with them and think they know a lot about them.) Put learners in groups of 2-4. Present an initial question that “levels the playing field” intentionally providing access to everyone regardless of prior knowledge, experience, or skill. In this case” what do you notice?” Start without talking, each learner observing alone with pencil and paper. Push the boundaries of silence, allow learners to struggle to look again and again at the eggs. Quietly invite them to touch them if they have not done so, offer a hand lens – keep them silently looking for more. When 90% -100% of the room seems at a loss of what to do next, invite them to begin sharing verbally with their neighbor. Invite learners to share what they noticed as a way to begin to expand thinking. Provide additional materials and questions to keep learners thinking and observing always grounding ideas in the evidence – the eggs by asking “can you show me?” Bring groups together to further expand thinking and challenge ideas/assumptions. Gather questions – look for moments of Aha, insight, doubt Bring class together to investigate questions as a group. Return to small groups with new materials and questions - grounding ideas in the evidence – the eggs. Introduce live chickens to deepen the complexity of the observation Practice in following the same process outlined eggs fieldwork with additional familiar materials that embody complex scientific concepts that align with STEM standards. (water, seeds, rocks, flowers, mirrors, balls and ramps, construction, simple machines, engineering design) Participate in fieldwork – process experience Observe professor working with children in class – process observation Practice prescribed fieldwork with individual or small groups of children Document experience in a report Map all student engagement back to STEM standards Process experiences in class Receive detailed feedback focused on keeping learners engaged, learning to ask quality questions. o The majority of feedback focuses on looking for what is working rather than changing what isn’t. o Letting go of why and how in favor of can you show me? Can you tell more about that? Is there a way we can test that idea out with what we have here? Expand content understanding Susan Rauchwerk, Nicole Weber, and Berri Jacque April 2015 Science Notebooks are elf-driven hands-on exploration of a science topic of choice requiring at least 50% time with hands on materials. 6 sessions, 4 prior to SCF, 2 while engaging kids in a self-designed critical exploration Collaborative exploration and construction of understanding is used as a community data gathering, like the moon, the way leaves change, or climate change Releasing responsibility- student lead discussions. Use primarily the discussion board In class discussions to o decide on goal setting and content focus o share, discuss and debate learnings o practice leadership Our Research Process… Develop a Science Curriculum Fieldwork that draws upon all course learning and experiences to develop and implement a CE. Science notebooks – content – being able to identify materials that embody complex scientific ideas In-class and practice fieldwork – modeling of questions and hands-on inquiry STEM standards – keeping in mind what we hope to teach Collaborating with colleagues o challenges and opportunities of designing effective instruction o observing/teaching/supporting o coordinating schedules o pacing/timing o out materials and instruction o Trouble shooting challenges Listening to learners Reflection on teaching practices Documentation of student learning for the purpose of informing instruction Developing instruction based on student engagement with materials AND potential of materials Guided Questions for Journals: 1. Describe a highlight from the session in detail, what happened, why did it stand out for you? 2. How was the students’ prior understandings revealed, used and or expanded? 3. What surprised you?