AP European History Document Based Questions Period 1 DOCUMENT BASED QUESTION 1 Directions: The following question is based on the accompanying Documents 1–6. This question is designed to test your ability to apply several historical-thinking skills simultaneously—i.e., periodization, historical argumentation, and patterns of continuity and change over time. Your response should be based on your analysis of the documents and your knowledge of the topic. Write a persuasive and coherent essay that does the following: States an appropriate thesis that directly addresses all parts of the question. Supports the thesis or an appropriate argument with evidence from all or all but one of the documents AND your knowledge of European history beyond/outside the documents. Analyzes a majority of the documents in terms of at least one of the following features as appropriate to the argument: intended audience, purpose, point of view, format, argument, limitations, and/or social context. Places the arguments in the context of broader regional, national, or global processes. Synthesizes all of the above into a coherent essay that extends the argument, links it to another historical context, OR accounts for conflicting evidence about the topic. Question 1. To what extent did the ideas and discoveries of the scientific revolution represent a source of continuity with or change from the world view established by ancient philosophers and the Catholic Church? 1 AP European History Document Based Questions Period 1 Document 1 Source: Nicolaus Copernicus, “To His Holiness, Pope Paul III,” Preface to On the Revolutions of the Heavenly Spheres, 1543 Those who know that the consensus of many centuries has sanctioned the conception that the earth remains at rest in the middle of the heaven as its center would, I reflected, regard it as an insane pronouncement if I made the opposite assertion that the earth moves. . . . . However, Your Holiness will perhaps not be greatly surprised that I have dared to publish my studies after devoting so much effort to working them out that I did not hesitate to put down my thoughts about the earth’s motion in written form too. But you are rather waiting to hear from me how it occurred to me to venture to conceive any motion of earth, against the traditional opinion of astronomers and almost against common sense. I have accordingly no desire to [hide] from Your Holiness that I was impelled to consider a different system of deducing the motions of the universe’s spheres for no other reason than the realization that astronomers do not agree among themselves in their investigations of this subject. For, in the first place, they are so uncertain about the motion of the sun and moon that they cannot establish and observe a constant length even for the tropical year. Secondly, in determining the motions not only of these bodies but also of the other five planets, they do not use the same principles, assumptions, and explanations of the apparent revolutions and motions. . . . . For a long time, then, I reflect on this confusion in the astronomical traditions concerning the derivation of the motions of the universe’s spheres. I began to be annoyed that the movements of the world machine. Created for our sake by the best and most systematic Artisan of all, were not understood with greater certainty by the philosophers, who otherwise examined so precisely the most insignificant trifles of this world. For this reason I undertook the task of rereading the works of all the philosophers which I could obtain to learn whether anyone had ever proposed other motions of the universe's spheres than those expounded by the teachers of astronomy in the schools. And in fact first I found in Cicero that Hicetas supposed the earth to move. Later I also discovered in Plutarch that certain others were of this opinion. I have decided to set his words down here, so that they may be available to everybody: Some think that the earth remains at rest. But Philolaus the Pythagorean believes that, like the sun and moon, it revolves around the fire in an oblique circle. Heraclides of Pontus, and Ecphantus the Pythagorean make the earth move, not in a progressive motion, but like a wheel in a rotation from west to east about its own center. 2 AP European History Document Based Questions Period 1 Document 2 Source: Cardinal Bellarmine, from a letter to Paolo Antonio Foscarini, April 12, 1615, responding to Galileo’s theories But to want to affirm that the sun really is fixed in the center of the heavens and only revolves around itself (i.e. turns upon its axis) without traveling from east to west, and that the earth is situated in the third sphere and revolves with great speed around the sun, is a very dangerous thing, not only by irritating all the philosophers and scholastic theologians, but also by injuring our holy faith and rendering the Holy Scriptures false. For Your Reverence has demonstrated many ways of explaining Holy Scripture, but you have not applied them in particular, and without a doubt you would have found it most difficult if you had attempted to explain all the passages which you yourself have cited. . . . Now consider whether in all prudence the Church could encourage giving to Scripture a sense contrary to the holy Fathers and all the Latin and Greek commentators. Document 3 Source: Galileo Galilei, from a letter to Grand Duchess Christina of Tuscany, 1615 Persisting in their original resolve to destroy me and everything mine by any means they can think of these men are aware of my views in astronomy and philosophy. They know that as to the arrangement of the parts of the universe, I hold the sun to be situated motionless in the center of the revolution of the celestial orbs while the earth revolves around the sun. They know also that I support this position not only by refuting the arguments of Ptolemy and Aristotle, but by producing many counter-arguments; in particular, some which relate to physical effects whose causes can perhaps be assigned in no other way. In addition there are astronomical arguments derived from many things in my new celestial discoveries that plainly confute the Ptolemaic system while admirable agreeing with and conforming the contrary hypothesis. Possibly because they are disturbed by the known truth of other propositions of mine which differ from those commonly held, and therefore mistrusting their defense so long as they confine themselves to the field of philosophy, these men have resolved to fabricate a shield for their fallacies out of the mantle of pretended religion and the authority of the Bible. These they apply with little judgment to the refutation [disproving] of arguments that they do not understand and have not even listened to. Document 4 Source: Sir Isaac Newton, Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy (Principia), 1687. 3 AP European History Document Based Questions Period 1 Thus far I have explained the phenomena of the heavens and of our sea by the force of gravity, but I have not yet assigned a cause to gravity. Indeed, this force arises from some cause that penetrates as far as the centers of the sun and planets without any diminution of its power to act, and that acts not in proportion to the quantity of the surfaces of the particles on which it acts (as mechanical causes are wont to do) but in proportion to the quantity of solid matter, and whose action is extended everywhere to immense distances, always decreasing as the squares of the distances. Document 5 Source: Galen, ancient Greek physician, On the Natural Faculties, second century A.D. In this way, nobody will suppose that bread represents a kind of meeting-place for bone, flesh. Nerve, and all the other parts, and that each of these subsequently become separated in the body and goes to join its own kind; before any separation takes place, the whole of the bread obviously becomes blood; (at any rate, if a man take no other food for a prolonged period, he will have blood enclosed in his veins all the same).* And clearly this disproves the view of those who consider the elements unchangeable, as also, for that matter, does the oil which is entirely used up in the flame of the lamp. . . . * Food from the alimentary canal was supposed by Galen to be converted into blood in and by the portal veins. Document 6 Source: Robert Boyle describing a conversation with William Harvey when Boyle asked Harvey what made him think that blood circulated, Robert Boyle, A Disquisition about the Final Causes of Natural Things. London,1688. ...that when he took notice the Valves in the Veins of so many several parts of the body, were so plac’d that they gave free passage to the Blood Towards the Heart, but oppos’d the passage of the Venal blood 4 AP European History Document Based Questions Period 1 the Contrary way: He was invited to imagine that so Provident a Cause as Nature had not so Plac’d so many Valves without Design: and no Design seem’d more probable, than That, since the Blood could not well, because of the interposing Valves, be Sent by the Veins to the Limbs; it should be Sent through the Arteries and Return though the Veins, whose Valves did not oppose its course that way. Key Concept: 1.1.IV.A Key Concept: 1.1.IV.B Key Concept: 1.1.IV.D Thematic Learning Objective: OS-1 Thematic Learning Objective: OS-5 Thematic Learning Objective: IS-1 Historical Thinking Skill: Periodization Historical Thinking Skill: Historical Argumentation Historical Thinking Skill: Patterns of Continuity and Change over Time (Continued on next page) DOCUMENT BASED QUESTION 2 Directions: The following question is based on the accompanying Documents 1–5. This question is designed to test your ability to apply several historical-thinking skills simultaneously—i.e., contextualization, historical argumentation, and appropriate use of relevant historical evidence. Your response should be based on your analysis of the documents and your knowledge of the topic. Write a well-integrated essay that does the following: States an appropriate thesis that directly addresses all parts of the question. 5 AP European History Document Based Questions Period 1 Supports the thesis or an appropriate argument with evidence from all or all but one of the documents AND your knowledge of European history beyond/outside the documents. Analyzes a majority of the documents in terms of at least one of the following features as appropriate to the argument: intended audience, purpose, point of view, format, argument, limitations, and/or social context. Places the arguments in the context of broader regional, national, or global processes. Synthesizes all of the above into a coherent essay that extends the argument, links it to another historical context, OR accounts for conflicting evidence about the topic. Question 2. Evaluate how effective the Catholic Reformation was in responding to the division within Christianity. Document 1 Source: Catholic Interrogation of Elizabeth Dirks, Protestant Dissenter Official, What do you think of our mass? (Elizabeth Dirks was an Anabaptist deaconess, who was tortured and eventually drowned in 1549 at the orders of the authorities in the town of Leeuwarden.) Elizabeth: My Lord, I have no faith in your mass but only in that which is the word of God. Official: What do you think of the Holy Sacrament? Elizabeth: I have never in my life read in Scripture about a Holy Sacrament, but only of the Supper of the Lord. Official: Shut your mouth; you speak with a haughty tongue. Elizabeth: No, my Lord, I speak with a free tongue. Official: Do priests have the power to forgive sins? Elizabeth: No, my Lord, how should I believe that? I say that Christ is the only priest through whom sins are forgiven. Official: So far we have treated you gently. Since you won’t confess, we will put you to torture. Take hold of her. Document 2 Source: Ignatius of Loyola, founder of the Jesuits, from his The Spiritual Exercises, 1535 Eleventh Rule. To praise positive and scholastic learning. Because, as it is more proper to the Positive Doctors, as St. Jerome, St. Augustine and St. Gregory, etc., to move the heart to love and serve God our Lord in everything; so it is more proper to the Scholastics, as St. Thomas, St. Bonaventure, and to the Master of the Sentences, etc., to define or explain for our times the things necessary for eternal salvation; and to combat and explain better all errors and all fallacies. For the Scholastic Doctors, as they are more modern, not only help themselves with the true understanding of the Sacred Scripture and of the Positive 6 AP European History Document Based Questions Period 1 and holy Doctors, but also, they being enlightened and clarified by the Divine virtue, help themselves by the Councils, Canons and Constitutions of our holy Mother the Church. Document 3 Source: Papal Bull that comes before and accompanies The Index of Prohibited Books in 1564 RULES I. All books condemned by the supreme pontiffs, or general councils, before the year 1515, and not comprised in the present Index, are, nevertheless, to be considered as condemned. II. The books of heresiarchs, whether of those who broached or disseminated their heresies prior to the year above-mentioned, or of those who have been, or are, the heads or leaders of heretics, as Luther, Zwingle, Calvin, Balthasar Pacimontanus, Swenchfeld, and other similar ones, are altogether forbidden, whatever may be their names, titles, or subjects. And the books of other heretics, which treat professedly upon religion, are totally condemned; . . . . VII. . . . But the works of antiquity, written by the heathens, are permitted to be read, because of the elegance and propriety of the language; though on no account shall they be suffered to be read by young persons. . . . X. . . . Finally, it is enjoined on all the faithful, that no one presume to keep or read any books contrary to these rules, or prohibited by this Index. But if any one read or keep any books composed by heretics, or the writings of any author suspected of heresy, or false doctrine, he shall instantly incur the sentence of excommunication; and those who read, or keep works interdicted on another account, besides the mortal sin committed, shall be severely punished at the will of the bishops. Document 4 Source: Decrees of the Council of Trent, 1564, from the Decree Concerning Purgatory. The Council of Trent met from 1545 to 1563. Whereas the Catholic Church, instructed by the Holy Ghost, has, from the sacred writings and the ancient tradition of the Fathers, taught, in sacred councils, and very recently the oecumenical [ecumenical] Synod*, that there is a Purgatory, and that the souls there detained are helped by the suffrages^ of the faithful, but principally by the acceptable sacrifice of the altar; the holy Synod enjoins on bishops that they diligently endeavor that the sound doctrine concerning Purgatory, transmitted by the holy Fathers and sacred councils, be believed, maintained, taught, and everywhere proclaimed by the faithful of Christ. But let more difficult and subtly questions, and which tend not to edification, and from which for the most part there is no increase of piety, be excluded from popular discourses before the uneducated multitude. In like manner, such things as are uncertain, or which labor under an appearance of error, let them not allow 7 AP European History Document Based Questions Period 1 to be made public and treated of. While those things which tend to a certain kind of curiosity or superstition, or which savour filthy lucre, let them prohibit as scandals and stumbling blocks of the faithful. But let the bishops take care, that the suffrages of the faithful who are living, to wit the sacrifices of masses, prayers, alms, and other works of piety, which have been wont to be performed by the faithful for the other faithful departed, be piously and devoutly performed, in accordance with the institutes of the church; and that whatsoever is due on their behalf, from the endowments of testators, or in other way, be discharged, not in a perfunctory manner, but diligently and accurately, by the priests and ministers of the church, and others who are bound to render this (service). Note: *The ecumenical Synod refers to the churchwide meetings at Trent; ^suffrages are prayers Document 5 Source: Teresa of Avila, Epilogue to The Interior Castle, her treatise on prayer, 1588 In return for my strong desire to aid you in serving Him, my God and my Lord, I implore you, whenever you read this, to praise His Majesty fervently in my name and to be Him to prosper His Church to give light to the Lutherans, to pardon my sins and to free me from purgatory, where perhaps I shall be, by the mercy of God, when you see this book (if it is given to you after having been examined by theologians). If these writings contain any error, it is through my ignorance; I submit in all things to the teachings of the holy Catholic Roman Church, of which I am now a member, as I protest and promise I will be both in life and death. Key Concept: 1.3.I.C Thematic Learning Objective: OS-2 Thematic Learning Objective: OS-11 Historical Thinking Skill: Contextualization Historical Thinking Skill: Historical Argumentation Historical Thinking Skill: Appropriate Use of Relevant Historical Evidence 8