April 2013 CCB proposals and comments to the first draft for the HELCOM Ministerial Declaration, October 2013 The First Draft of the HELCOM Ministerial Declaration was presented by HELCOM secretariat and discussed at the HELCOM HOD and Commission meeting 4-6 March 2013 in Helsinki. CCB see a need to strengthen and complement the declaration to safeguard that the HELCOM BSAP goals can be reached. To guarantee such implementation of the BSAP more precise and detailed actions need to be developed in some areas of the BSAP. Hereby CCB submit proposals of special importance for the HELCOM ministerial declaration October 2013, related to nutrient pollution, biodiversity and ecosystem-based fisheries and marine litter, with reference to the numbered paragraphs under each section in the Draft declaration, document 2/3 to the HOD 40th meeting, 4 March 2013. Biodiversity and ecosystem-based fisheries Insert in 1 (B) NOTE that the goals of the Baltic Sea Action Plan of 2007 has not been reached in several areas related to fisheries. We agree to reconfirm those goals and above all underline to uphold, in line with the international commitment adopted by World Sustainable Development Summit hold in Johannesburg in 2002, the commitment to reaching a fishing mortality below Maximum Sustainable Yield by 2015. Insert in 7 (B) or 17 (B) CONCERNED about the ecologically intolerable amount of by-catch of other fishes, birds and marine mammals, Coalition Clean Baltic (CCB), Östra Ågatan 53, SE-753 22 Uppsala, Sweden Tel: +46 18 71 11 55 E-mail: secretariat@ccb.se / gunnar.noren@ccb.se www.ccb.se Org. number: 802015-1281 CCB is a member of The World Conservation Union (IUCN) Coalition Clean Baltic is a network of environmental NGOs sponsored by: Danish Society for Nature Conservation Ecohome Estonian Green Movement Finnish Association for Nature Conservation Finnish Society for Nature & Environment Bund für Umwelt und Naturschutz Deutschland, BUND Environmental Protection Club of Latvia, VAK Latvian Green Movement Lithuanian Green Movement Lithuanian Fund for Nature Environment Information Centre, Vilnius, Lithuania Polish Ecological Club, PKE Green Federation - GAJA, Szczecin, Poland Friends of the Baltic, St Petersburg, Russia Ecodefense, Kaliningrad, Russia Neva River Clearwater, St Petersburg, Russia Green World, St Petersburg, Russia The Guide Environmental Group, Kaliningrad, Russia Greens of Karelia, Petrozavodsk, Russia Friends of the Earth, Sweden Swedish Society for Nature Conservation Swedish-Polish Association for Environmental Protection WWF Sweden The Western Center of the Ukrainian Branch of the World Laboratory 2 Cod Insert in 24 (B). CONCERNED about the high proportion of juvenile cod caught in Baltic cod trawl fisheries, disturbing the development of a natural cod stock structure. To secure the cod stocks in the Baltic Sea to full recovery by 2021, the Contracting Parties DECIDE to - Ensure that the coming Baltic multispecies management plan is aligned with the targets agreed from the BSAP of 2007 and for good environmental status Baltic Salmonids DECIDE on further measures to safeguard wild Baltic salmon and sea trout stocks, including Insert as action in point 23 (B) - by 2014 develop at least one comprehensive salmon river management plan in each of HELCOM countries with weak salmon populations, and also develop such plans for at least one potential rivers for salmon reintroduction in both Finland and Poland, with priority to Baltic Main Basin and Gulf of Finland (ICES assessment units 4,5 and 6) and implement such plans until 2016. Clarifiy and amend 23 (B) indent 1 -common practices for breeding, rearing and releasing salmon and sea trout as introduction in potential salmonid rivers Eel Insert in 25 (B) CONCERNED that the development and implementation of national programmes for the conservation of eel stocks has not progressed in accordance with the goals of the Baltic Sea Action Plan, and further steps must now be taken. The human induced mortality on eels must be reduced close to zero in line with ICES repeated advice from 2011 and 2012. Eel cannot be considered for targeted fishery any longer since it is highly endangered. Underlining the need To revise and improve the national management plans for eel, including development of programs for the conservation of eel stocks to secure a future of the eel stock. For EU Member States these plans should be developed in accordance with the Council Regulation (EC) 1100/2007. DECIDE - To start phasing out targeted eel fisheries in the sea, with primary focus on the eel fishery in the migratory routes of eel, with no further delay and at latest by 2014 . - By 2014 submit a proposal for inclusion of eel to the Habitat Directives annex 5 as an endangered species, for those HELCOM CPs also being members of the EU 3 Clarification needed in 26 (B) - By 2014 submit a proposal, to the CMP (Convention on Migratory Species) COP11 meeting in 2014, for inclusion of European eel in (not annex) appendix II of the Bonn Convention and simultaneously start work on an agreement according to art. V of this Convention, involving at least all signatory parties also being HELCOM CPs and also aiming at adding an MoU with the Russian Federation. Harbour Porpoise NOTE the importance of new information on the distribution, density and hot spot areas for Baltic harbor porpoises coming from the SAMBAH project in 2013 Insert either as a part of 10 (B) or in connection with 17 (B) – 21 (B) DECIDE - by 2015 develop comprehensive actions to mitigate negative impact from human activities in Baltic Sea areas of special importance for the threatened Baltic harbour porpoises - to intensify designation of new protected areas for harbor porpoise and in these areas implement management that particularly mitigates bycatch problems and underwater noise Fishery management in Baltic Sea Protected Areas Insert in connection with 15 (B) RECALLING the ministerial meeting in 2010, stating the need to develop and implement management within marine protected areas by 2015, and that every new BSPA designation should within five years be followed by the establishment of a management plan and/or measures; REQUEST the competent authorities to participate in the BALTFIMPA project to set clear guidelines for assessing needed management measures and propose a comprehensive list of options to protect habitats and species in the Baltic Sea marine protected areas. DECIDE no later than 2014 to report the national progress on establishment and implementation of fisheries management plans and by 2015 implement fishery management that secures the objectives of the protected areas and, in cases of doubt, follow a precautionary approach Aquaculture Insert in 27 (B) RECOGNIZE the importance to define sustainable aquaculture and steer the development of aquaculture in the BSR to minimize all of its environmental impacts NOTE that upstream and recirculating land-based aquaculture systems have the best possibilities to control negative environmental impact from aquaculture 4 DECIDE - That aquaculture should primarily be land-based operations that can contain and control the potential negative impacts - To strongly recommend the use of feed based on nutrients only from the Baltic Sea region in aquaculture operations and a feed with a maximum of 1/3 fish based fat and proteins to minimize further pressure of nutrient deposition to the Baltic Sea and reduce fishing pressure on wild fish stocks MARINE LITTER Insert correct reference to MSFD targets and years of monitoring and operational programs implementation 2015 and 2016. Insert in connection to 30 (B) AGREE -to set a goal for reduction of marine litter in the Baltic Sea with 50 % within 10 years Insert to 32 (B) DECIDE -set up an HELCOM task force specifically addressing the problems of litter in the Baltic Sea including monitoring and mitigation, also for micro plastics -by 2014 develop and test technology for removal of microplastics in municipal waste water treatment plants and introduce pilot-scale techniques for such removal at least with one Baltic Sea region city