Revised 18 December 2012 WILD HARVESTING OF INSECTS FOR EXPORT 1.0 Introduction The purpose of this application is to gain approval of the activities of the applicant as a Wildlife Trade Operation to export wild harvested beetle specimens. The applicant has been collecting insects in north Queensland for over 40 years and possesses invaluable expertise and knowledge of the region’s species and habitats. Specimens are to be collected on five freehold properties in north Queensland. These properties are located at Bakerville, Cooktown, Miriwinni, the Upper Barron and Wondecla. None of the species to be collected are protected by State or Federal legislation. 1.1 Scientific names The applicant proposes to collect specimens from the following family groups: Buprestidae Cerambycidae Curculionidae Elateridae Geotrupidae Lucanidae Passalidae Scarabaeidae (subfamilies – Cetoniinae, Dynastinae and Rutelinae) A list of specific species for harvest has been provided to Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (DSEWPaC), and is restricted to those species (from the above mentioned family groups only) which are already identified as existing on the properties in question. 1.2 Common name – beetles. The family groups listed above and on the specific species list are all beetles. 1.3 Location of harvest The applicant harvests at five freehold properties in north Queensland: Property 1 - Bakerville (to the west of the Evelyn Tableland), Property 2 - Cooktown, Property 3 - Miriwinni (coastal wet-tropics), Property 4 - Upper Barron (Atherton Tableland) and Property 5 - Wondecla (Evelyn tableland). 1.4 Description of what is to be harvested Whole insects suitable for collectors or enthusiasts will be harvested. Any imperfect or damaged specimens will be released. Please see Section 3 for further details. 1.5 Is the species protected under State or Federal Legislation? None of the species to be harvested are protected under State or Federal Legislation. -1- 2.0 Statement of general goal/aims The ability to export wild harvested specimens compliments the applicant’s existing captive breeding program by increasing both the number of families and the number of species able to be supplied. The environmental management philosophy followed by the applicant involves the sustainable use of natural resources. The primary management strategy pursued is the reforestation and preservation of the properties in question. A brief description and recent history of the Wondecla properties (5A & 5B) is as follows: Wondecla is situated west of the Great Dividing Range on the Evelyn Tableland, north Queensland, and enjoys 1200 mm annual rainfall. Substantial tin deposits were discovered in the 1880s; mining commenced at this time and ran until the 1940’s. During this period the original forest was cleared. After the 1940’s and prior to purchase by the applicant, the properties were used by graziers who followed a fire regime designed to destroy all vegetation except grass. When the property was purchased, it carried small numbers of 3 Eucalyptus spp., 2 Acacia spp. (5 specimens) and 1 Casuarina sp. (3 specimens), set in a sea of highly flammable blady grass interspersed with bare eroded areas. To date the applicant has planted approximately 4500 native plants of 400 species. These plantings currently cover an area of approximately 2.5 hectares, which includes the surrounding vacant land (road reserves, lapsed mining leases and defunct rail reserve). Although the applicant does not hold legal tenure on the balance of these 2.5 hectares, reforesting this additional land is considered advantageous. Apart from improving property aesthetics, it achieves a better plant biomass dependent microclimate. This optimises insect species diversity and abundance. As a result of the reforestation there has been a steady increase in fauna species diversity and abundance. The applicant considers their project as analogous to an intensive forestry operation. Just as plantation forests (established for specific outcomes) are more productive than unmanaged forests, so the applicant is of the view that this forest is vastly more productive than the surrounding depauperate forest. Plant species have been selected to maximise wild harvest potential. This same principle has been applied to the Bakerville property (Property 1). As reforestation has progressed on the Wondecla properties and plant species enrichment progressed on Property 1, remarkable changes in the fauna have been witnessed. Species diversity and abundance of higher taxa (particularly birds) have also greatly benefited. Not only has insectivorous fauna benefited but so have foliage, nectar and sap feeders. One example of this is the squirrel glider. This species arrived approximately 9 years ago, and there is now a resident “troupe”. All listed properties are important refuges in their respective areas. 3.0 Harvest Details This proposal covers the harvest of species from the families listed in Section 1.1. As indicated previously, a list of specific species for harvest has been provided to DSEWPaC. -2- Only species on this list can be exported. The list includes an annual quota that must not be exceeded (see Section 3.3). None of these species are listed under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 as threatened or listed as endangered or vulnerable under Queensland Nature Conservation Regulation 2006. The list of species provided to DSEWPaC can be amended by DSEWPaC if additional information becomes available on a particular taxon or species. The list can be amended by: reducing the quota or stopping the harvest of a particular taxon or species, or including conditions relating to the harvest or export of that taxon or species. The list may also be amended by the applicant if and when species previously unrecorded on the properties in question are identified. If the applicant wishes to export such species, details will be forwarded to DSEWPaC to determine any conservation concerns. If no concerns are held, the species will be added to the list of species available for export. However, if there are conservation concerns for the species, it will not be added to the list of available species and no exports will be permitted. Any new species added to the list of available species must belong to the family groups named in Section 1.1, otherwise a new WTO application is required. The list is amended when DSEWPaC has notified the applicant of the amendment in writing. 3.1 Details of where harvesting is to take place. The applicant proposes to harvest on five freehold properties, situated at Bakerville, Cooktown, Miriwinni, Upper Barron, and Wondecla, all in north Queensland. 3.2 Details of land ownership All properties are freehold. Written permission from the landholders to collect on these properties has been provided to DSEWPaC. Property Descriptions Property 1, Bakerville, approximately 28 hectares. This property has been set aside for conservation purposes for the last 35 years and supports a complex of riverine forest, tall layered and low layered woodland and dry rain forest. Property 2, Cooktown. Approximately 8.5 hectares. This property supports approximately 2.5 hectares of riverine and monsoon vine forest. Approximately 6 hectares is complex grassland. Property 3, Miriwinni, 14 hectares. This property carries approximately 4 hectares of complex mesophyll vine forest and 10 hectares of regrowth. Prior to its purchase by the current owners, (28 years ago), 12 hectares was under sugar cane. This portion is now a mosaic of complex grassland and rainforest pioneers. Property 4, Upper Barron, 73 hectares. This property carries seventy hectares of complex notophyll vine forest; most of the surrounding land has been cleared for dairy farming. For the last 31 years this property has been set aside for conservation purposes and is the focus of scientific research and eco-tourism. -3- Property 5A, Wondecla, 0.4074 hectares. Reforested Mabi, dry rainforest and vine thicket. Property 5B, Wondecla, 0.4074 hectares. Turkeys nest dam and reforested Mabi, dry rainforest and vine thicket. This revegetation project (on two separate blocks of land, both owned by the applicant) has been progressing for 23 years. 3.3 Quantities to be harvested Property Annual quota, unless reduced by DSEWPaC as indicated above in Section 3.0 Property 1, Bakerville, 28 hectares 200 specimens per species, except for Anoplognathus parvulus, where the applicant seeks permission to harvest up to 400 specimens annually Property 2, Cooktown, 8.5 hectares 50 specimens per species Property 3, Miriwinni, 16 hectares 100 specimens per species Property 4, Upper Barron, 73 hectares 350 specimens per species, except for Anoplognathus aenus, where the applicant seeks permission to harvest up to 400 specimens annually Property 5A Wondecla, 0.4074 hectares 10 specimens per species Property 5B Wondecla, 0.4074 hectares 3.4 Methods of harvesting and equipment Specimens are harvested by hand or with a hand held net either from available nectar sources or by attracting them using rotting fruit baits and artificial light sources. Baits and artificial light sources are only used when they can be monitored. Methods are selective as specimens are taken live, examined immediately and if worn returned to the wild. Method of collecting entails no environmental disturbance. 3.5 Timing and duration of harvesting period Some species can be found as adults year round. Peak activity is from October to June, depending on seasonal factors. 4.0 Impact of harvest on the species and the relevant ecosystems. Insect species respond very quickly to exploit any underutilised resource. The loss of individuals to predation or harvesting simply allows a higher percentage of the following generation to survive, by exploiting these underutilised resources. Insects are well known for the boom and bust nature of their population cycles. This dynamic occurs as numbers fluctuate around optimal populations given available resources and factors working to reduce their numbers. Often numbers fluctuate wildly for no obvious reason. Climatic conditions may have been favourable over an extended period of time, yet insects have not been as prolific as expected. -4- Because of the reforestation of Property 1, plant species enrichment at Property 2 and regeneration of Property 3, we have witnessed a steady increase in species diversity and numbers. All species targeted have large geographic ranges and enjoy secure status. The ecosystems where harvest is to take place are not disturbed in any way as collection methods are unobtrusive. These ecosystems are well represented in various National Parks and Reserves and the vast majority of the Wet Tropics is World Heritage listed. Total area where wild harvest is to take place is insignificant when compared to the areas occupied by the aforementioned estates. The methods of collecting are inefficient, with many individuals avoiding capture. There will be insignificant impact on the conservation status of the species to be harvested and none on the ecosystems. 5.0 Monitoring and assessment. The applicant has been monitoring the areas to be harvested for a number of years via observations on species abundance and diversity. The applicant’s own property (Properties 5A & 5B)) has been under observation for 23 years, Property 1 for 25 years, Property 2 for 2 years, Property 3 for 24 years and Property 4 for over 25 years. Insect numbers fluctuate wildly from year to year regardless of whether or not harvesting is taking place. 5.1 Has there been a resource assessment of distribution and abundance (for example, population survey) for the harvest area? If yes, please provide. There has been no resource assessment of distribution and abundance. However, given the small scale of the proposed operation, it is highly unlikely that any insect species found within the areas where harvesting is to take place will be affected by harvesting. 6.0 MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES Specimens are harvested only as required, which greatly limits any impact on the local environment. In addition, as previously stated, insects are well known for the boom and bust nature of their population cycles. Given the land management practices in place, the applicant is of the view that it is not possible to over-collect any species, particularly given the level at which the quotas are set. 7.0 COMPLIANCE There are no State legislative requirements to harvest non-protected insects. However, only legally obtained material is to be exported. 8.0 REPORTS The applicant will report to DSEWPaC on harvest figures for each financial year. The report will be due at the end of August for the previous financial year. The report will provide harvest details for each species by month for each property. The applicants will provide additional reports to DSEWPaC on particular taxa if required by DSEWPaC. -5-