Royal Holloway, University of London Seeking Your Views On How We Should Respond To The Government’s Green Paper- Part 2 HOW DOES THE GREEN PAPER AFFECT ROYAL HOLLOWAY AND HOW MIGHT WE RESPOND? Background The Government has recently published a Green Paper called ‘Fulfilling our Potential: Teaching excellence, social mobility and student choice’. The Green Paper is being used to consult with the higher education sector, and others, on proposed changes to a number of structures and processes that will affect the way we run our university and how we engage with our students. In summary, the Green Paper proposes: The introduction of a teaching excellence framework Objectives to improve access of socially disadvantaged students to higher education Changes to the process and requirements governing entry of new providers into the higher education system The way in which higher education providers are regulated. The College will respond to the consultation, but to help us formulate that response we are seeking your views. We are running our consultation in two parts. In part 1, we summarise the main changes proposed in the Green Paper and seek views from departments and the Students’ Union on the overall Green Paper. Views on this part will be gathered by Heads of Academic Departments and Professional Services. In this part (part 2), we are seeking views from departments or individuals on how the Green Paper might directly affect Royal Holloway and how we should respond. Responding to Part 2 If you or a group (department etc.) wishes to respond to this, part 2 of the consultation, please send comments on any or all of the questions asked below. There is a form at the end of this document which can be completed. The response should be emailed to julia.roberts@royalholloway.ac.uk and received no later than 20 December 2015. 1 What the government wants to achieve What it means for universities How Royal Holloway might respond 1. Teaching excellence will be rewarded with reputational and financial incentives Our current position: NSS assessment & feedback – 75% NSS teaching quality –84% NSS learning resources – 74% 52% of staff with teaching qualifications The government seeks: Institutions will need to: We can improve our performance by: a. a. b. 1. b. c. d. e. Drive up teaching standards To improve the quality of the student academic experience and student outcomes To help students understand what they are getting for their money and improve the value they derive from their investment To provide students with transparent information about teaching quality, course content and graduate outcomes for all students To provide better signalling for employers as to which HEIs can be trusted to produce highly skilled graduates To put in place a mechanism to ensure institutions are recognised and rewarded for teaching excellence in the same way as they are for research excellence c. d. e. f. g. Provide evidence of teaching quality Provide evidence of a supportive teaching environment Provide evidence of student outcomes and learning gain Ensure all types of students are able to progress successfully Demonstrate that teaching is valued as much as research Ensure teaching and research are recognised as mutually reinforcing activities Provide opportunities for students to engage in helping to shape their programmes of study where appropriate 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Rewarding teaching excellence and providing outstanding teachers with the same recognition and opportunities for career and pay progression as outstanding researchers Stimulating greater linkages between teaching and research and demonstrate the value of research-led teaching Highlighting and sharing exemplary teaching practices Engaging students with the curriculum and their learning Ensuring all students receive support in order to achieve their educational and professional potential Ensuring that our provision reflects the diversity of our students needs Question 1a: Are there likely to be other implications in driving up teaching standards? Question 1b: What other steps should we take to improve our teaching? 2 What the government wants to achieve What it means for universities How Royal Holloway might respond 2. Equipping students for the world of work Institutions will need to teach students the transferable and work readiness skills that businesses require Royal Holloway’s rates of graduate employability fall well below that of our competitors – only 62.7% our graduates are in graduate level jobs or further study 6 months after graduation The government seeks: Institutions will need to: We can improve the employment chances of our students by: a. a. b. To ensure the Higher Education sector delivers lasting value to graduates and taxpayers To improve the skills and 'job readiness' of the graduate labour pool Submit evidence on how they are with employers, professional bodies etc. in terms of course and curriculum design. 1. 2. 3. Ensuring our courses, curriculum design and teaching and assessment are effective in developing student knowledge and skills Involving employers and professional bodies in curriculum design Ensuring as many programmes as possible are accredited by the relevant professional body Question 2a: Are there likely to be other implications in equipping our students for the world of work? Question 2b: What other steps should we take to further equip our students for the world of work? 3 What the government wants to achieve What it means for universities How Royal Holloway might respond 3. The Green Paper acknowledges that a grade point average system will not tackle 'grade inflation' but universities will need to show , as part of their evidence of teaching excellence, how they are addressing issues of grade inflation Royal Holloway is currently ranked 36th for ‘good honours’ in the Time Good University Guide (% of students achieving 1st & 2:1s) The government seeks: Institutions will need to: We will need to respond by: a. a. 1. b. c. Changes to the degree classification system To improve the consistency of degree classification across the sector To provide businesses with a classification system that will help them distinguish between graduates and identify the best applicants To provide students with degree classifications that are a currency carrying prestige and that hold value Adopt a Grade Point Average (GPA) system that will provide a more granular account of student achievement 2. 3. Having documented standards of performance that relate to our marking and classification systems Adopting, at an early stage, a grade point average (GPA) system, that will allow parallel running with the degree classification scheme so as to help us better understand the GPA system Taking measures to promote better understanding of the GPA and degree classification systems. Question 3a: Are there likely to be other implications in moving to a grade point average system? Question 3b: What other steps should we take to respond to the government wish to change the degree classification system? 4 What the government wants to achieve What it means for universities How Royal Holloway might respond 4. Changing the regulatory system to create an Office for Students Provide transparency so that students, employers and tax payers have the information to hold institutions accountable Consider the relationship between the College and its students The government seeks: Institutions will need to: We will need to respond by: a. a. 1. b. c. d. e. f. Create a single organisation to champion the needs of students and increase transparency, reduce bureaucracy and save public money To promote the interest of students, employers and tax payers to ensure value for money in their investment in education To empower students to make the best choices through improved access to information To ensure the rights of students to hold providers to account and to focus on the protection of students To protect institutional autonomy and academic freedom To operate the TEF b. Become accountable to the new Office for Students Manage the loss of HEFCE as a mediator between government and universities 2. 3. Clearly demonstrating our students receive value for money Considering the extent to which our students are customers or partners Considering how we hear the voice of our students Question 4a: Are there likely to be other implications resulting from the creation of an Office for Students? Question 4b: What other steps should we take as a result of the creation of the Office for Students and the implications it has on the relationship between the College and its students? 5 What the government wants to achieve What it means for universities How Royal Holloway might respond 5. Potential that research quality will be increasingly assessed through metrics such as research grant income, number of citations, number of research students per FTE Royal Holloway is currently ranked 42nd for research grant income per academic FTE with only 5 departments in the upper quartile The government seeks: Institutions will need to: We will need to respond by: a. a. 1. b. c. d. Simplification of the system for distributing research funding To reduce complexity and bureaucracy in overall research overall funding To retain dual funding streams of block grant and research council funding To explore options to streamline and reduce burdens in the design of future REF To consider making greater use of metrics, using both peer review and metrics to identify emerging and sustained research excellence Provide evidence of research quality in a more streamlined and cost-effective manner 2. 3. 4. Considering how the burden of the REF could be reduced Considering the implications on each discipline of the introduction of a metrics-based REF Considering what metrics might be most appropriate Ensuring that we perform as well as we can on likely metrics Question 5a: Are there likely to be other implications of simplification of the research funding distribution system? Question 5b: What other steps should we take to respond to changes in REF and the research funding distribution system? 6 Royal Holloway, University of London Response to Consultation- Part 2 Name (department, group etc.) Person to contact if we have any follow-up questions Questions Response Question 1a: Are there likely to be other implications in driving up teaching standards? Question 1b: What other steps should we take to improve our teaching? Question 2a: Are there likely to be other implications in equipping our students for the world of work? Question 2b: What other steps should we take to further equip our students for the world of work? Question 3a: Are there likely to be other implications in moving to a grade point average system? Question 3b: What other steps should we take to respond to the government wish to change the degree classification system? Question 4a: Are there likely to be other implications resulting from the creation of an Office for Students? Question 4b: What other steps should we take as a result of the creation of the Office for Students and the implications it has on the relationship between the College and its students? Question 5a: Are there likely to be other implications of simplification of the research funding distribution system? 7 Questions Response Question 5b: What other steps should we take to respond to changes in REF and the research funding distribution system? 8