Structural Model Gap
Analysis
National Shipbuilding Research Program (NSRP)
Integrated Logistics Environment (ILE)
Sharing Structural Design Data with Manufacturing Systems
across Shipyards (Subtask 1.2)
Document Tracking Number
Revision Number
Revision Date
Prepared by
Document1
NSRP-ILE-1.2-002
1.0
21 January 2011
Michael Olson,
Northrop Grumman Technical Services
David Pierce,
Northrop Grumman Technical Services
Pete Lazo
Product Data Services Corporation
Document Number: NSRP-ILE-1.2-002
Rev: 1.0
Document Title: ILE Structural Model Gap Analysis
Revision Log
Rev
Date
Reason for Change
Page(s)
1.0
Draft
7 January 2011
Initial Draft for ILE Team Meeting in
Norfolk, VA
All
1.0
21 January 2011
Final updates for delivery
Sections 1.3, 3.1, 3.2, Table 5,
Section 5.1 (Acronyms)
Document1
i
Document Number: NSRP-ILE-1.2-002
Rev: 1.0
Document Title: ILE Structural Model Gap Analysis
Table of Contents
1.0
Business Context ................................................................................................ 1
1.1
Objectives .................................................................................................................... 1
1.2
Background.................................................................................................................. 1
1.3
Scope .......................................................................................................................... 1
1.4
Assumptions ................................................................................................................ 3
2.0
Gap Analysis Approach ...................................................................................... 4
2.1
Data ............................................................................................................................. 4
2.2
Analysis Approach ....................................................................................................... 4
3.0
Gap Analysis Results .......................................................................................... 6
3.1
ISPE Common Data Mapping to SCIM ........................................................................ 6
3.2
Mapping to SCIM ........................................................................................................30
3.3
SCIM Structural Model Gap Summary ........................................................................30
4.0
Reference Documents ....................................................................................... 38
5.0
Terminology ....................................................................................................... 39
5.1
Acronyms ....................................................................................................................39
Document1
ii
Document Number: NSRP-ILE-1.2-002
Rev: 1.0
Document Title: ILE Structural Model Gap Analysis
Table of Figures
Figure 1-1 - Shipbuilding Product Models................................................................................... 2
Document1
iii
Document Number: NSRP-ILE-1.2-002
Rev: 1.0
Document Title: ILE Structural Model Gap Analysis
Table of Tables
Table 1: ISPE Build Tree Entity Mapping to SCIM ..................................................................... 7
Table 2: ISPE Component Entity Mapping to SCIM .................................................................10
Table 3: ISPE Part Entity Mapping to SCIM .............................................................................14
Table 4: ISPE Common Attribute Mapping to SCIM .................................................................16
Table 5: AP 218 SCIM Structural Model Gap Summary ...........................................................31
Document1
iv
Document Number: NSRP-ILE-1.2-002
Rev: 1.0
Document Title: ILE Structural Model Gap Analysis
1.0
Business Context
1.1
Objectives
The objective of this document is to analyze and describe the gaps identified between the ship
structural design information required by shipyard manufacturing systems (documented in
Reference [1]) and the Ship Common Information Model (SCIM) Structural Design chapter. The
SCIM Structural Design chapter defines the Navy shipbuilding-specific structural design data
requirements derived from the STEP AP 218 standard (Reference [2]).
1.2
Background
Over the past several years the National Shipbuilding Research Program (NSRP) Integrated
Shipbuilding Environment (ISE) project has been developing and prototyping tools to enable
interoperability among shipyard and Navy systems. Recently, a specification for the next
generation Navy shipbuilding Integrated Product Data Environment (IPDE) system was written
as part of the Navy Product Data Initiative (NPDI) project. Included in the IPDE specification is
the Ship Common Information Model (SCIM), an information model derived from the STEP
Shipbuilding Application Protocols, which defines the minimum set of entities, attributes, and
relationships required to support Navy shipbuilding data exchange requirements.
1.3
Scope
Phase 1 of the Integrated Logistics Environment (ILE) project will apply the tools, methods, and
information models developed by the ISE team and the NPDI SCIM project to two current
shipbuilding requirements: VIRGINIA Class IPDE data migration (subtask 1.1) and the sharing
of structural design information with manufacturing systems across shipyards (subtask 1.2).
The project will validate the capabilities of the NPDI SCIM as a means for supporting
interoperability within and among the shipyards and the Navy. Phase 2 of the ILE project will
complete the remaining chapters of the SCIM document, as well as update existing chapters to
incorporate lessons learned during the validation efforts undertaken in phase 1.
Subtask 1.2 of ILE Phase 1 is focused on the requirements for sharing structural design
information with manufacturing systems across shipyards. The scenario of efficiently
exchanging ship product data from design to manufacturing, whether it is within the same
shipyard or between two shipyards, has repeated itself time and again in recent years.
Historically, the shipyards have not had a viable method for importing structural design data
from one shipyard into the manufacturing system of another shipyard. In addition, there are
currently very few, if any, systems in place to translate design data to the manufacturing
systems of other yards.
Subtask 1.2 addresses the exchange of structural design data from the prime designer to a
manufacturing yard, either within the same shipyard or in a second shipyard, and analyzes
whether the SCIM provides a sufficient data model to facilitate this exchange. The approach for
this task is to define the data model for the exchange of structural design data with
manufacturing using existing programs as examples, compare the data model to the SCIM data
model, identify gaps in the SCIM data model, and make recommendations for improving the
SCIM. These tasks will be documented in four deliverables:
•
•
Structural Model Import Requirements Report
SCIM Gap Analysis Report
Document1
1
Document Number: NSRP-ILE-1.2-002
Rev: 1.0
Document Title: ILE Structural Model Gap Analysis
•
•
SCIM Dataset Results Report
Final Import Results Report
This document is the second of the four deliverables. The specific scope of this document is to
define the gaps between the structural design data required by manufacturing and the SCIM
Structural Design chapter. The structural design data required by manufacturing was identified
using the work of the NSRP Integrated Steel Processing Environment (ISPE) project and
example data for the CVN 21 and DDG 1000 programs. These requirements are documented
in the first deliverable for the project, Structural Model Import Requirements (Reference [1]).
Figure 1-1 depicts a notional set of product models in the center, their general content on the
left, and the functions which produce or consume the data in the various product models on the
right. The focus of this task is on the exchange of the Design Product Model with manufacturing
in order to perform the production planning function and develop the 3D Manufacturing Product
Model (indicated by the yellow box). This information was compared to the SCIM Structural
Design chapter to validate the SCIM content for meeting the design to manufacturing data
exchange requirements.
Product Models
• Moulded Forms & Lines
• Preliminary scantlings
• Structural systems
• Unit Breakdown
Scantling Design
• Structural Part Definition
• Structural Part Relationships
• Seams
• Features
3D Detailed Design
• Assembly breakdown
• Assembly order
• Welds
• Bevels
• Bending lines
• Flat pattern parts
• Marking Lines
• Shipyard specific parts
• Added material
• Marking lines, Labeling
• Tabs
• Manufacturing Aids
Functions
Detailed Design
Production
Planning
3D Manufacturing
Piece Part
Development
2D Neutral Piece Parts
Manufacturing
Definition
2D Shipyard Piece Parts
Nesting
Drawings &
Reports
NC
Figure 1-1 - Shipbuilding Product Models
Document1
2
Document Number: NSRP-ILE-1.2-002
Rev: 1.0
Document Title: ILE Structural Model Gap Analysis
1.4
Assumptions
The following assumptions are made regarding the scope of this effort:
•
The Shipyard Common Process Model developed previously for the NSRP
Integrated Steel Processing Environment (ISPE) project is still an accurate high level
depiction of the shipyard design and manufacturing processes
•
While internal processes and systems may be different within different shipyards, a
similar set of design data is required to perform the manufacturing functions
•
This effort is focused on common 3D Detailed Design Product Model and 3D
Manufacturing Product Model, not specific data required to feed shipyard-specific
manufacturing tools
Document1
3
Document Number: NSRP-ILE-1.2-002
Rev: 1.0
Document Title: ILE Structural Model Gap Analysis
2.0
Gap Analysis Approach
This section describes the approach for performing the gap analysis between the structural
model exchange requirements, identified in the Structural Model Import Requirements Report,
and the SCIM Structural Design chapter. The detailed results of the gap analysis are described
in Section 3.0.
2.1
Data
Three primary sets of data were used to perform the analysis. The first set of data was from the
NSRP Integrated Steel Processing Environment (ISPE) project. The ISPE project documented
a set of common processes and data for the development and exchange of structural design
and manufacturing information across several shipyards including NGSB-GC (Avondale and
Ingalls), NGSB-NN, and General Dynamics Electric Boat. This information is documented in the
ISPE Shipyard Requirements Final Report (Reference [3]).
The second set of data was from the DDG 1000 program, specifically the design data being
transferred from Catia V5 to Teamcenter Enterprise and the data planned for transfer from
Teamcenter Enterprise to Teamcenter Manufacturing to support the Manufacturing Planning
process.
The third set of data was from the CVN 21 program. This data included the product model data
for Design, Manufacturing, and Planning as well as sample entities and attributes from the Catia
V4 design tool.
This data is described in the first project deliverable, Structural Model Import Requirements
(Reference [1]).
2.2
Analysis Approach
The overall approach to the SCIM gap analysis was to understand the current content of the
SCIM AP 218 chapter, analyze and organize the data obtained for DDG 1000 and CVN 21 to
facilitate an orderly comparison with the SCIM, and then perform mappings between the project
data and the SCIM data to identify any gaps in the SCIM data.
An initial analysis was performed to obtain an understanding of the derivation of the SCIM AP
218 data entities and attributes relative to the AP 218 Application Reference Model (ARM) and
several context schemas developed on the ISE-4 project for structural features, lofting, and
manufacturing. This analysis highlighted entities not included in the SCIM AP 218 chapter and
reasons for their exclusion. It also provided a baseline understanding of the SCIM AP 218 data
from which further analysis and mapping could be performed.
The structural design data obtained from the DDG 1000 and CVN 21 projects were analyzed to
understand the information and organize it in a way that would facilitate comparison with the
SCIM data. An initial attempt to organize the data according to the ISPE common data
organization revealed that this approach would not facilitate direct comparison to the SCIM.
Because of this, a decision was made to organize the data according to the main structural
entities defined in the SCIM: structural systems/assemblies, plates, and profiles. Once the data
was organized in this manner, a mapping was performed between the project data and the
SCIM.
Document1
4
Document Number: NSRP-ILE-1.2-002
Rev: 1.0
Document Title: ILE Structural Model Gap Analysis
An analysis was also performed on the ISPE common data requirements to understand this
information and assess its applicability to the current SCIM validation effort. It was determined
that the common processes and data described in the ISPE final report were still representative
of the shipyard processes and data requirements, making this another good source of
information for comparison to the SCIM. The common entities and attributes identified in the
ISPE project were mapped to the SCIM to identify potential gaps in the SCIM data.
Document1
5
Document Number: NSRP-ILE-1.2-002
Rev: 1.0
Document Title: ILE Structural Model Gap Analysis
3.0
Gap Analysis Results
3.1
ISPE Common Data Mapping to SCIM
The ISPE project defined a set of common data requirements including the following
information:

Entity Categories

Attribute Categories

Attribute Names

Entity Relationship Diagram
This section provides a mapping of ISPE common data requirements to the SCIM and identifies
gaps. Table 1 provides a mapping of ISPE Build Tree entities to the SCIM. Table 2 provides a
mapping of ISPE Component entities to the SCIM. Table 3 provides a mapping of ISPE Part
entities to the SCIM. Table 4 provides a mapping of ISPE Common Attributes to the SCIM. For
each of these tables an attempt was made to map the ISPE entities/attributes to SCIM
entities/attributes. “No mapping” was used to indicate that an appropriate mapping to the SCIM
does not exist at this time, and that updates to the SCIM may be required to resolve the issue.
A final disposition for each “No mapping” will be included in the next deliverable (SCIM Dataset
Results Report).
Document1
6
Document Number: NSRP-ILE-1.2-002
Rev: 1.0
Document Title: ILE Structural Model Gap Analysis
Table 1: ISPE Build Tree Entity Mapping to SCIM1
Entity
Ship Hull
Module
1
Business Description
Molded Lines define the geometry
of a hull as a surface without
thickness. Typically, the inside
surface of flush shell plating is on
the molded line, as is the
underside of deck plating.
A Module or a Superlift is a section
of a ship consisting of several
units. Module size is subject to
each shipyards capacity and
processes. For example, the LHD 5
ship produced at Ingalls consisted
of 5 Modules.
AP218 SCIM Mapping
npd:Physical_assembly
npd:Physical_occurrence
AP218 assembly
npd:Physical_assembly
npd:Physical_occurrence
AP218 assembly
Comment
There needs to be a npd:physical_occurrence for
each npd:design_occurrence as the ship moves
from design to manufacturing. They are linked via
association:
npd:Design_occurrence_physical_occurrence.
The npd:Physical_assembly is linked to the
npd:Physical_occurrence by the associations:
- npd:Physical_assembly_child
- npd:Physical_assembly_parent
There needs to be a npd:physical_occurrence for
each npd:design_occurrence as the ship moves
from design to manufacturing. They are linked via
association:
npd:Design_occurrence_physical_occurrence.
The npd:Physical_assembly is linked to the
npd:Physical_occurrence by the associations:
- npd:Physical_assembly_child
- npd:Physical_assembly_parent
Recommend handling build trees in AP218 SCIM by adding AP218 entity assembly as a sub-type of npd:Physical_occurrence.
Document1
7
Document Number: NSRP-ILE-1.2-002
Rev: 1.0
Document Title: ILE Structural Model Gap Analysis
Entity
Unit
Build Tree
Level 1
Build Tree
Level 2
Business Description
A Unit is the last assembly level
before the Module. Units are
typically the basis for planning,
reporting, and scheduling.
Build Tree Level 1 is comprised of
Build Tree Level 2 plus additional
parts
Build Tree Level 2 is comprised of
the next lower Build Tree Level
plus additional parts
AP218 SCIM Mapping
npd:Physical_assembly
npd:Physical_occurrence
AP218 assembly
npd:Physical_assembly
npd:Physical_occurrence
AP218 assembly
npd:Physical_assembly
npd:Physical_occurrence
AP218 assembly
Comment
There needs to be a npd:physical_occurrence for
each npd:design_occurrence as the ship moves
from design to manufacturing. They are linked via
association:
npd:Design_occurrence_physical_occurrence.
The npd:Physical_assembly is linked to the
npd:Physical_occurence by the associations:
- npd:Physical_assembly_child
- npd:Physical_assembly_parent
There needs to be a npd:physical_occurrence for
each npd:design_occurrence as the ship moves
from design to manufacturing. They are linked via
association:
npd:Design_occurrence_physical_occurrence.
The npd:Physical_assembly is linked to the
npd:Physical_occurence by the associations:
- npd:Physical_assembly_child
- npd:Physical_assembly_parent
There needs to be a npd:physical_occurrence for
each npd:design_occurrence as the ship moves
from design to manufacturing. They are linked via
association:
npd:Design_occurrence_physical_occurrence.
The npd:Physical_assembly is linked to the
npd:Physical_occurence by the associations:
- npd:Physical_assembly_child
- npd:Physical_assembly_parent
Document1
8
Document Number: NSRP-ILE-1.2-002
Rev: 1.0
Document Title: ILE Structural Model Gap Analysis
Entity
Build Tree
Level X
Business Description
Build Tree Level X is the lowest
level construction assembly
AP218 SCIM Mapping
npd:Physical_assembly
npd:Physical_occurrence
AP218 assembly
Comment
There needs to be a npd:physical_occurrence for
each npd:design_occurrence as the ship moves
from design to manufacturing. They are linked via
association:
npd:Design_occurrence_physical_occurrence.
The npd:Physical_assembly is linked to the
npd:Physical_occurence by the associations:
- npd:Physical_assembly_child
- npd:Physical_assembly_parent
Document1
9
Document Number: NSRP-ILE-1.2-002
Rev: 1.0
Document Title: ILE Structural Model Gap Analysis
Table 2: ISPE Component Entity Mapping to SCIM
Entity
Business Description
AP218 SCIM Mapping
Frame Planes
Frame Planes are reference lines
which can be stiffened with plates
or profiles.
npd:Structural_system_functional_definition.The
_function="frame"
Deck
A Deck is a continuous horizontal
strength member inside a ship hull
that supports equipment and
personnel.
npd:Structural_system_functional_definition.The
_function="deck"
Platform/Flat
A Platform/Flat is a horizontal,
non-strength, non-continuous
surface inside a ship’s hull.
npd:Structural_system_functional_definition.The
_function="platform_deck"
Girder
A Girder has the following
definitions: 1. A continuous
member running fore-and-aft
under a deck to support the deck
and deck beams. 2. The vertical
fore-and-aft plate members on the
ship's bottom (shell and tanktop
only).
npd:Structural_system_functional_definition.The
_function="girder"
Comment
also
"strength_deck"
"accomodation_deck"
"main_deck"
"weather_deck"
"navigation_deck"
"platform_deck"
"deck_in_superstructure"
also
"longitudinal_girder"
Document1
10
"flat" NOT IN THE SCIM. Recommend
"user_defined" for "flat".
Document Number: NSRP-ILE-1.2-002
Rev: 1.0
Document Title: ILE Structural Model Gap Analysis
Entity
Bulkhead
Floor
Sponsons
Transverse
Bent
Web Frame
Business Description
AP218 SCIM Mapping
Bulkhead is a term applied to the
vertical partition walls which
subdivide the interior of a ship
into compartments. Various types
of bulkheads (transverse,
longitudinal, forepeak, watertight,
wire-mesh, pilaster, etc.) are
distinguished by their location,
use, material type, or fabrication
method.
A Floor is a vertical transverse
plate immediately above the
bottom shell plating, often located
at every frame, extending from
bilge to bilge above the shell
plating to tank top only.
Extensions of the ship's hull to
accommodate the flight deck,
weapons system, refueling
platforms, etc…
Transverse structural arches that
support the Flight Deck.
npd:Structural_system_functional_definition.The
_function="bulkhead"
A Web Frame is a built up frame to
provide extra strength, usually
consisting of a web plate which is
flanged, or otherwise stiffened, on
its edge. Web frames are typically
spaced several frames apart, with
smaller regular frames in between.
npd:Structural_system_functional_definition.The
_function="web_frame"
Comment
npd:Structural_system_functional_definition.The
_function="floor"
No Mapping
Recommend adding “sponsons” to
npd:Structural_system_functional_definition.The_f
unction.
No Mapping
Recommend adding “transverse_bent” to
npd:Structural_system_functional_definition.The_f
unction.
also
"vertical_web_frame"
"transverse_web_frame"
Document1
11
Document Number: NSRP-ILE-1.2-002
Rev: 1.0
Document Title: ILE Structural Model Gap Analysis
Entity
Innerbottom /
Double
Bottom / Bilge
Business Description
The area of the ship between the
tank top and shell, includes all
structural members in between
(i.e. floors, longitudinals, etc…)
Stringer Bar
Angle connecting the deck plate to
the shell plate.
Deck Beam
An athwartship horizontal
structural member, usually a
rolled shape, supporting a deck or
a flat.
Extruded run of standard
structural material used to
strengthen or otherwise support
plated structures. They are made
from stock profile material (T's,
angles, bulbs, etc.) and are often
described in terms of their Web
and Flange components. Profiles
are also used in foundation design
to support machinery or
equipment.
Profile
AP218 SCIM Mapping
npd:Structural_system_functional_definition.The
_function="inner_bottom"
npd:Structural_system_functional_definition.The
_function="double_bottom"
npd:Structural_part_functional_definition.The_f
unction="bilge_plate"
npd:Plate_functional_definition.The_function="b
ilge_plate"
also
"bottom"
npd:Structural_system_functional_definition.The
_function="stringer"
npd:Structural_system_functional_definition.The
_function="deck_beam"
npd:Profile_functional_definition.The_function=
"deck_beam"
npd:Profile_functional_definition.The_function=
[appropriate enumeration value of
<xs:simpleType
name="Structural_part_functionality">]
i.e.:
"bracket"
"stiffener"
"longitudinal_stiffener"
"transversal_stiffener"
"carling"
"beam"
"deck_beam"
"pillar"
"hold_pillar"
"user_defined"
Document1
12
Comment
Document Number: NSRP-ILE-1.2-002
Rev: 1.0
Document Title: ILE Structural Model Gap Analysis
Entity
Commodity
Components
Business Description
Standard components such as
brackets and collars.
AP218 SCIM Mapping
Comment
npd:Structural_system_functional_definition.The
_function="bracket"
npd:Structural_part_functional_definition.The_f
unction="bracket"
npd:Profile_functional_definition.The_function=
"bracket"
"collar" NOT IN THE SCIM; recommend adding to
npd:Structural_system_functional_definition.The_f
unction,
npd:Structural_part_functional_definition.The_fun
ction
npd:Profile_functional_definition.The_function
Recommend adding other commodity components
when identified.
Recommend adding “breast_hook” to
npd:Structural_system_functional_definition.The_f
unction.
Breast Hook
A Breast Hook is a triangular plate
bracket joining port and starboard
side stringers at the stem.
No Mapping
Stanchion
A Stanchion is a vertical column
supporting decks, flats, girders,
etc.
No Mapping
Recommend adding “stanchion” to
npd:Structural_system_functional_definition.The_f
unction.
Foundation
A Foundation is a structural
support for boilers, engines, gears,
machinery, etc.
npd:Structural_system_functional_definition.The
_function="engine_foundation"
Other foundation types NOT IN SCIM; recommend
adding "foundation" to
npd:Structural_system_functional_definition.The_f
unction.
Document1
13
Document Number: NSRP-ILE-1.2-002
Rev: 1.0
Document Title: ILE Structural Model Gap Analysis
Table 3: ISPE Part Entity Mapping to SCIM
Entity
Plate Part
Shell Plate
Business Description
A Plate Part is the lowest level
assembly structural component
which has manufacturing data,
and can be cut from flat plate.
This does not include "hardware"
(i.e. washers) or hardware-like
accessories.
Shell Plates form the outer side
and bottom skin of the hull.
AP218 SCIM Mapping
Comment
npd:Plate_functional_definition.The_function="s
tandard_plate"
simpletype: Structural_part_functionality:
"standard_plate"
"doubling_plate"
"shedding_plate"
"clip"
"watertight_clip"
"lug"
"bracket"
"face_plate"
"carling"
"flange"
"web"
"frame"
"bilge_plate"
"user_defined"
No Mapping
NOT IN THE SCIM; recommend adding the
following enumeration to SCIM and AP218:
simpleType name="Structural_part_functionality"
npd:Plate_functional_definition.The_function="she
ll_plate"
Note: simpletype Structural_system_functionality
has the complementary enumeration values:
"outer_shell"
"inner_shell"
"double_shell"
Document1
14
Document Number: NSRP-ILE-1.2-002
Rev: 1.0
Document Title: ILE Structural Model Gap Analysis
Entity
Profile Part
Business Description
A Profile Part is the lowest level
assembly structural component
which has manufacturing data,
and can be cut from profile stock
such as I-beams or flat bar.
AP218 SCIM Mapping
npd:Profile_functional_definition.The_function=
"standard_plate"
simpletype: Structural_part_functionality:
"stiffener"
"longitudinal_stiffener"
"transversal_stiffener"
"beam"
"deck_beam"
"pillar"
"hold_pillar"
"user_defined"
Document1
15
Comment
Document Number: NSRP-ILE-1.2-002
Rev: 1.0
Document Title: ILE Structural Model Gap Analysis
Table 4: ISPE Common Attribute Mapping to SCIM
Entity
Category
Build Tree
Attribute
Category
Physical
Description
Configuration
Management
Common Attribute Name
AP218 SCIM Mapping
Footprint
Assembly_manufacturing_position.assembly_footprint
Mass
Assembly_manufacturing_definition.mass
Center of Gravity
Assembly_manufacturing_definition.centre_of_gravity
Manufacturing Orientation
Assembly_manufacturing_position.orientation
Identifier
npd:Physical_occurrence.Id
Version
npd:Physical_occurrence.Version
Hull Applicability
npd:Ship.Hull_number
npd:Hull_applicability.Start_hull
npd:Hull_applicability.End_hull
Comment
Need to revisit Hull Applicability vs
Ship in PDM chapter. Reference Piping
227 recommended changes.
Include npd:Physical_occurrence in this
review.
Associations:
npd:Ship_physical_occurrence
Scheduling
Routing
Does Ship need association to
npd:Hull_applicability?
Does AP 218 SCIM need additional
dates?
Does AP 218 SCIM need additional
dates?
Does AP 218 SCIM need additional
dates?
Start Production Date Estimate
No Mapping
End Production Date Estimate
No Mapping
Start Production Date Actual
No Mapping
End Production Date Actual
Assembly_manufacturing_definition.production_date
Status
No Mapping
Does AP 218 SCIM need status?
Next Production Stage
No Mapping
Does AP 218 SCIM need next
production stage?
Current Production Stage
Assembly_manufacturing_definition.assembly_stage
Document1
16
Document Number: NSRP-ILE-1.2-002
Rev: 1.0
Document Title: ILE Structural Model Gap Analysis
Entity
Category
Attribute
Category
General
Design
Component
Description
Common Attribute Name
AP218 SCIM Mapping
Fabrication/Manufacturing
Methods
Drawing No
Assembly_manufacturing_definition.assembly_method
Component_Type
npd:Structural_system_functional_definition.The_funct
ion
npd:Panel_system_functional_definition.The_function
npd:Plate_strake_functional_definition.The_function
Comment
Assembly_manufacturing_definition.assembly_drawing
npd:Structural_part_functional_definition.The_function
npd:Plate_functional_definition.The_function
npd:Profile_functional_definition.The_function
Mass
Thickness_Throw
Mass is handled in parts in SCIM. See Part-plate and
Part-profile below.
Center of Gravity is handled in parts in SCIM. See
Part-plate and Part-profile below.
Manufacturing Orientation is handled in build tree in
SCIM. See Build Tree/Physical
Description/Manufacturing Orientation above.
Material_Type is handled in parts in SCIM. See Partplate and Part-profile below (Material_code).
npd:Panel_system_design_definition.Material_offset
Geometric_Origin
No Mapping
Max_Length_neat
No Mapping
Min_Length_neat
No Mapping
Load_bearingstrength_requirements
Material characteristics (type)
No Mapping
Center of Gravity
Manufacturing Orientation
Material_Type
Derivable from the geometry. Not
stored in the SCIM.
Derivable from the geometry. Not
stored in the SCIM.
Derivable from the geometry. Not
stored in the SCIM.
No Mapping
Need to add to AP218 SCIM material
entity. No such attribute now.
Type is at part level.
Document1
17
Document Number: NSRP-ILE-1.2-002
Rev: 1.0
Document Title: ILE Structural Model Gap Analysis
Entity
Category
Attribute
Category
Configuration
Management
Common Attribute Name
AP218 SCIM Mapping
Material characteristics
(thickness)
Material characteristics (grade)
npd:Panel_system_design_definition.Thickness
Attached/adjacent structural
entities
- Relative thickness
Attached: npd:Structural_system_relationship
Adjacent:
npd:Structural_system_adjacency_relationship
No Mapping
- Joining requirements
No Mapping
- Relative material types
No Mapping
- Structural entity types
No Mapping
- Orientation
No Mapping
Location and orientation within
the ship
Process requirements such as
shaping
Assembly sequence
No Mapping
Routing (shop assignments)
No Mapping
Identifier
npd:Design_occurrence.Id
Version
npd:Design_occurrence.Version
No Mapping
Comment
Need to add to AP218 SCIM material
entity. No such attribute now.
Grade is at part level.
Derivable from the geometry. Not
stored in the SCIM.
No Mapping
See build tree, assemblies
Document1
18
Build tree identifies the parts in the
assembly but not the sequence.
Document Number: NSRP-ILE-1.2-002
Rev: 1.0
Document Title: ILE Structural Model Gap Analysis
Entity
Category
Attribute
Category
Common Attribute Name
Hull Applicability
AP218 SCIM Mapping
npd:Ship.Hull_number
npd:Hull_applicability.Start_hull
npd:Hull_applicability.End_hull
Comment
Need to revisit Hull Applicability vs
Ship in PDM chapter. Reference P
iping 227 recommended changes.
Include npd:Physical_occurrence in this
review.
Associations:
npd:Ship_physical_occurrence
Does Ship need association to
npd:Hull_applicability?
Manufactur
able
Component
Design
Attributes
*All the attributes of a Design
Component plus the following
See Above
Yard and
Shop Specific
Mfg.
Attributes
Added_material
Applied to Part-plate and Part-profile
only.
Removed_material
npd:Structural_added_material_feature_design_definit
ion.Added_material_length
No Mapping
Chamfers
npd:Corner_cutout_design_definition
"A Corner_cutout_design_definition
may specify the design_definition for
either a Corner_cutout (see
4.2.42) or an Edge_feature (see
4.2.73). Material is removed along the
direction of the Z-axis. If the
Z-axis is oriented along the part edge,
the Corner_cutout_design_definition
specifies an Edge_feature
(see 4.3.26 for the application
assertion). If the Z-axis is oriented
perpendicular to the part edge, the
Corner_cutout_design_definition
specifies an Corner_cutout (see 4.3.25
for the application
assertion)".
Document1
19
Document Number: NSRP-ILE-1.2-002
Rev: 1.0
Document Title: ILE Structural Model Gap Analysis
Entity
Category
Attribute
Category
Common Attribute Name
Welding_access_and_clearanc
e_features
Ships_reference_lines_for_ere
ction
Part-plate
Description
AP218 SCIM Mapping
Comment
AP 218
structural_part_manufacturing_definition.top_layout_
marks
AP 218
structural_part_manufacturing_definition.bottom_layo
ut_marks
Need to add AP 218
structural_part_manufacturing_definiti
on to SCIM.
No Mapping
Long_Point_or_Short_Point_ge
ometry
Beveling
No Mapping
Surface_Clearance
No Mapping
Part_Type
npd:Structural_part_functional_definition.The_function
npd:Plate_functional_definition.The_function
Units
npd:Definition.local_units (association)
npd:Corner_cutout_design_definition
Document1
20
NOTE: review ISE 4, ISPE Final Report,
table 7 to determine if marking lines
and labels require more detailed
definition in SCIM.
"A Corner_cutout_design_definition
may specify the design_definition for
either a Corner_cutout (see
4.2.42) or an Edge_feature (see
4.2.73). Material is removed along the
direction of the Z-axis. If the
Z-axis is oriented along the part edge,
the Corner_cutout_design_definition
specifies an Edge_feature
(see 4.3.26 for the application
assertion). If the Z-axis is oriented
perpendicular to the part edge, the
Corner_cutout_design_definition
specifies an Corner_cutout (see 4.3.25
for the application
assertion)".
Do we have capability to use global
units in SCIM for all parts?
Document Number: NSRP-ILE-1.2-002
Rev: 1.0
Document Title: ILE Structural Model Gap Analysis
Entity
Category
Attribute
Category
Common Attribute Name
Material_code
AP218 SCIM Mapping
No Mapping
Comment
Need to add AP 218 entity,
homogeneous_ship_material_property
Review
homogeneous_ship_material_property
.material_reference and
homogeneous_ship_material_property
.description for applicability to the
SCIM. Consider changing "description"
to "Material_code".
Plate_thickness
npd:Plate_design_definition.Thickness
Min-max_extent
No Mapping
Area
No Mapping
Center_Of_Gravity
No Mapping
Replace
npd:Plate_design_definition.Mass with
new property:
npd:Plate_design_definition.weight_an
d_centre_of_gravity.
Need to add AP218 entity,
weight_and_centre_of_gravity to
SCIM.
Center_Of_Gravity is assigned to
weight_and_centre_of_gravity.centre_
of_gravity.
Document1
21
Document Number: NSRP-ILE-1.2-002
Rev: 1.0
Document Title: ILE Structural Model Gap Analysis
Entity
Category
Attribute
Category
Common Attribute Name
Weight
AP218 SCIM Mapping
npd:Plate_design_definition.Mass
Comment
Replace
npd:Plate_design_definition.Mass with
new property:
npd:Plate_design_definition.weight_an
d_centre_of_gravity.
Need to add AP218 entity,
weight_and_centre_of_gravity to
SCIM.
Weight is assigned to
weight_and_centre_of_gravity.weight.
Length_and_width
No Mapping
Geometry
2D: plate_manufacturing_definition properties
3D: plate_manufacturing_definition.representations
Quantity
Configuration
Management
Required quantity
No Mapping
Can be derived from product model
instances.
Nesting N/A
Nested quantity
No Mapping
Identifier
npd:Plate_design_definition.Id
Version
npd:Plate_design_definition.Version
Document1
22
Document Number: NSRP-ILE-1.2-002
Rev: 1.0
Document Title: ILE Structural Model Gap Analysis
Entity
Category
Attribute
Category
Common Attribute Name
Hull Applicability
AP218 SCIM Mapping
npd:Ship.Hull_number
npd:Hull_applicability.Start_hull
npd:Hull_applicability.End_hull
Comment
Need to revisit Hull Applicability vs
Ship in PDM chapter. Reference Piping
227 recommended changes.
Include npd:Physical_occurrence in this
review.
Associations:
npd:Ship_physical_occurrence
Scheduling
Mfg. and
Design
Associations
Estimated Start
No Mapping
Actual_Start
No Mapping
Status
No Mapping
Weld
npd:Weld
npd:Weld_design_definition
npd:Welded_joint
npd:Welded_joint_design_definition
AP 218 weld_manufacturing_definition
Document1
23
Does Ship need association to
npd:Hull_applicability?
Does AP 218 SCIM need additional
dates?
Does AP 218 SCIM need additional
dates?
Does AP 218 SCIM need additional
dates?
Need to add AP 218
weld_manufacturing_definition to
SCIM.
Document Number: NSRP-ILE-1.2-002
Rev: 1.0
Document Title: ILE Structural Model Gap Analysis
Entity
Category
Attribute
Category
Common Attribute Name
AP218 SCIM Mapping
Edge Prep
npd:Corner_cutout_design_definition
Penetrations
npd:Feature_design_definition (3D)
AP 218
structural_part_manufacturing_definition.inner_contou
rs (2D)
AP 218
structural_part_manufacturing_definition.top_punch_p
oint (2D/3D)
AP 218
structural_part_manufacturing_definition.bottom_pun
ch_point (2D/3D)
AP 218
structural_part_manufacturing_definition.top_layout_
marks
AP 218
structural_part_manufacturing_definition.bottom_layo
ut_marks
Marking Line
Document1
24
Comment
"A Corner_cutout_design_definition
may specify the design_definition for
either a Corner_cutout (see
4.2.42) or an Edge_feature (see
4.2.73). Material is removed along the
direction of the Z-axis. If the
Z-axis is oriented along the part edge,
the Corner_cutout_design_definition
specifies an Edge_feature
(see 4.3.26 for the application
assertion). If the Z-axis is oriented
perpendicular to the part edge, the
Corner_cutout_design_definition
specifies an Corner_cutout (see 4.3.25
for the application
assertion)".
Need to add AP 218
structural_part_manufacturing_definiti
on to SCIM.
Need to add AP 218
structural_part_manufacturing_definiti
on to SCIM.
NOTE: review ISE 4, ISPE Final Report,
table 7 to determine if marking lines
and labels require more detailed
definition.
Document Number: NSRP-ILE-1.2-002
Rev: 1.0
Document Title: ILE Structural Model Gap Analysis
Entity
Category
Attribute
Category
Common Attribute Name
Label
General
Part-profile
Description
AP218 SCIM Mapping
Comment
AP 218
structural_part_manufacturing_definition.top_annotati
on
AP 218
structural_part_manufacturing_definition.bottom_ann
otation
Need to add AP 218
structural_part_manufacturing_definiti
on to SCIM.
NOTE: review ISE 4, ISPE Final Report,
table 7 to determine if marking lines
and labels require more detailed
definition.
Nest tape
No Mapping
Process & route
No Mapping
Manufacturing aid
No Mapping
Programmer
No Mapping
Job_number
No Mapping
Job_name
No Mapping
Drawing_number
npd:Document_metadata
engineering_remarks
No Mapping
Part_Type
npd:Structural_part_functional_definition.The_function
npd:Profile_functional_definition.The_function
Units
npd:Definition.local_units (association)
Do we have capability to use global
units in SCIM for all parts?
Material_code
No Mapping
Need to add AP 218 entity,
homogeneous_ship_material_property
Review
homogeneous_ship_material_property
.material_reference and
homogeneous_ship_material_property
.description for applicability to the
SCIM. Consider changing "description"
to "Material_code".
Document1
25
Document Number: NSRP-ILE-1.2-002
Rev: 1.0
Document Title: ILE Structural Model Gap Analysis
Entity
Category
Attribute
Category
Common Attribute Name
AP218 SCIM Mapping
Plate_thickness
npd:Profile_cross_section.Designation
Min-max_extent
No Mapping
Area
No Mapping
Center_Of_Gravity
No Mapping
Comment
npd:Profile_cross_section.Designation
is the profile equivalent to a plate
thickness. The Designation provides
the name of the profile cross section
from which pertinent profile
information can be derived.
Replace
npd:Profile_design_definition.Mass
with new property:
npd:Profile_design_definition.weight_
and_centre_of_gravity.
Need to add AP218 entity,
weight_and_centre_of_gravity to
SCIM.
Weight
npd:Profile_design_definition.Mass
Center_Of_Gravity is assigned to
weight_and_centre_of_gravity.centre_
of_gravity.
Replace
npd:Profile_design_definition.Mass
with new property:
npd:Profile_design_definition.weight_
and_centre_of_gravity.
Need to add AP218 entity,
weight_and_centre_of_gravity to
SCIM.
Weight is assigned to
weight_and_centre_of_gravity.weight.
Document1
26
Document Number: NSRP-ILE-1.2-002
Rev: 1.0
Document Title: ILE Structural Model Gap Analysis
Entity
Category
Attribute
Category
Common Attribute Name
AP218 SCIM Mapping
Length_and_width
No Mapping
Geometry
2D: plate_manufacturing_definition properties
Comment
3D: plate_manufacturing_definition.representations
Quantity
Configuration
Management
Required quantity
No Mapping
Can be derived from product model
instances.
Nesting N/A
Nested quantity
No Mapping
Identifier
npd:Plate_design_definition.Id
Version
npd:Plate_design_definition.Version
Hull Applicability
npd:Ship.Hull_number
npd:Hull_applicability.Start_hull
npd:Hull_applicability.End_hull
Need to revisit Hull Applicability vs
Ship in PDM chapter. Reference Piping
227 recommended changes.
Include npd:Physical_occurrence in this
review.
Associations:
npd:Ship_physical_occurrence
Scheduling
Mfg. and
Design
Associations
Does Ship need association to
npd:Hull_applicability?
Does AP 218 SCIM need additional
dates?
Does AP 218 SCIM need additional
dates?
Does AP 218 SCIM need status?
Estimated Start
No Mapping
Actual_Start
No Mapping
Status
No Mapping
Weld
npd:Weld
npd:Weld_design_definition
npd:Welded_joint
npd:Welded_joint_design_definition
AP 218 weld_manufacturing_definition
Document1
27
Need to add AP 218
weld_manufacturing_definition to
SCIM.
Document Number: NSRP-ILE-1.2-002
Rev: 1.0
Document Title: ILE Structural Model Gap Analysis
Entity
Category
Attribute
Category
Common Attribute Name
AP218 SCIM Mapping
Edge Prep
npd:Corner_cutout_design_definition
Penetrations
npd:Feature_design_definition (3D)
AP 218
structural_part_manufacturing_definition.inner_contou
rs (2D)
AP 218
structural_part_manufacturing_definition.top_punch_p
oint (2D/3D)
AP 218
structural_part_manufacturing_definition.bottom_pun
ch_point (2D/3D)
AP 218
structural_part_manufacturing_definition.top_layout_
marks
AP 218
structural_part_manufacturing_definition.bottom_layo
ut_marks
Marking Line
Document1
28
Comment
"A Corner_cutout_design_definition
may specify the design_definition for
either a Corner_cutout (see
4.2.42) or an Edge_feature (see
4.2.73). Material is removed along the
direction of the Z-axis. If the
Z-axis is oriented along the part edge,
the Corner_cutout_design_definition
specifies an Edge_feature
(see 4.3.26 for the application
assertion). If the Z-axis is oriented
perpendicular to the part edge, the
Corner_cutout_design_definition
specifies an Corner_cutout (see 4.3.25
for the application
assertion)."
Need to add AP 218
structural_part_manufacturing_definiti
on to SCIM.
Need to add AP 218
structural_part_manufacturing_definiti
on to SCIM.
NOTE: review ISE 4, ISPE Final Report,
table 7 to determine if marking lines
and labels require more detailed
definition.
Document Number: NSRP-ILE-1.2-002
Rev: 1.0
Document Title: ILE Structural Model Gap Analysis
Entity
Category
Attribute
Category
Common Attribute Name
Label
General
AP218 SCIM Mapping
Comment
AP 218
structural_part_manufacturing_definition.top_annotati
on
AP 218
structural_part_manufacturing_definition.bottom_ann
otation
Need to add AP 218
structural_part_manufacturing_definiti
on to SCIM.
Nest tape
No Mapping
Process & route
No Mapping
Manufacturing aid
No Mapping
Programmer
No Mapping
Job_number
No Mapping
Job_name
No Mapping
Drawing_number
npd:Document_metadata
engineering_remarks
No Mapping
Document1
29
NOTE: review ISE 4, ISPE Final Report,
table 7 to determine if marking lines
and labels require more detailed
definition.
Document Number: NSRP-ILE-1.2-002
Rev: 1.0
Document Title: ILE Structural Model Gap Analysis
3.2
Mapping to SCIM
This section provides a mapping of sample structural design data to the SCIM and identifies
gaps. A detailed mapping of NGSB-NN Catia data to SCIM is provided in the following Excel
spreadsheet. The spreadsheet also includes a mapping of ISPE Common Data to SCIM as well
as a summary of the gaps and discussions and recommendations from the 11 January 2011 ILE
team meeting in Norfolk, VA. A detailed README tab is also included which describes the
contents of the spreadsheet.
AP218_ContextSche
ma_Entities&Attributes_v0.6.xlsx
The mapping of sample NGSB-GC data to SCIM has not been completed yet, but will be
included in the next deliverable (SCIM Dataset Results Report).
3.3
SCIM Structural Model Gap Summary
Table 5 provides a summary of the SCIM Structural Model Gaps identified in this analysis, along
with recommended changes to the SCIM Structural Design chapter. A final disposition of the
gaps will be included in the next deliverable (SCIM Dataset Results Report).
Document1
30
Document Number: NSRP-ILE-1.2-002
Rev: 1.0
Document Title: ILE Structural Model Gap Analysis
Table 5: AP 218 SCIM Structural Model Gap Summary
Gap Category
SCIM Structural manufacturing
chapter entity candidates
Issue
The following AP 218 entities are not included in SCIM:
assembly
assembly_bounding_box
assembly_relationship
homogeneous_ship_material_property
ship_material_property
structural_added_material_boundary_relationship
weld_filler_material
annotation
plate_manufacturing_definition
profile_manufacturing_definition
structural_part_manufacturing_definition
weld_manufacturing_definition
electrode_chemical_composition
structural_cutout_manufacturing_relationship
weld_testing;
assembly_manufacturing_definition
assembly_manufacturing_position
centre_location
Document1
31
Comments/Recommendation
Candidates for SCIM Structural manufacturing
chapter based on analysis of AP 218 SCIM entity
mapping to ISE 4 manufacturing entities.
Since there are so few entities to add,
recommend augmenting the existing AP218 SCIM
design chapter with these entities.
There will be one context schema but SCIM AP
218 chapter will identify/list what
entities/associations are used in a given exchange
(design, planning, or manufacturing).
Document Number: NSRP-ILE-1.2-002
Rev: 1.0
Document Title: ILE Structural Model Gap Analysis
Gap Category
Missing AP218 SCIM material
attributes
Issue
The following NN Catia Attributes do not map to SCIM:
Material
Density
Quality
MATERIAL_DESCRIPTION
MATERIAL_REVISION_LEVEL
TREATMENT SPEC
MATERIAL_CONTROL_LEVEL
Comments/Recommendation
Add the following AP218 material entities to
SCIM:
ship_material_property
homogeneous_ship_material_property
Ensure piping (AP 227) has a corresponding
material model.
The following ISPE attributes map to AP218 material entities:
Design Component/Description/Material characteristics (type)
Design Component/Description/Material characteristics (grade)
Document1
32
Document Number: NSRP-ILE-1.2-002
Rev: 1.0
Document Title: ILE Structural Model Gap Analysis
Gap Category
Assembly concept missing
Issue
The following NN Catia assembly Attributes do not map to SCIM:
SCIM AP215/ AP218 Arrangements
PARENT
PLN1
PLN2
P02_BASE_LVL NAME
P03_PLANNING LVL 3 ITM #
P03_PLANNING LVL 3 NAME
P04_PLANNING LVL 4 ITM #
P04_PLANNING LVL 4 NAME
P05_PLANNING LVL 5 ITM #
P05_PLANNING LVL 5 NAME
P06_PLANNING LVL 6 ITM #
P06_PLANNING LVL 6 NAME
P07_PLANNING LVL 7 ITM #
P07_PLANNING LVL 7 NAME
P08_PLANNING LVL 8 ITM #
P08_PLANNING LVL 8 NAME
P09_PLANNING LVL 9 ITM #
P09_PLANNING LVL 9 NAME
P10_PLANNING LVL 10 ITM #
P10_PLANNING LVL 10 NAME
P11_PLANNING LVL 11 ITM #
P11_PLANNING LVL 11 NAME
P12_PLANNING LVL 12 ITM #
P12_PLANNING LVL 12 NAME
The following NN Catia Attributes do not map to SCIM:
COMPARTMENT_NO
ZONELEVEL
Document1
33
Comments/Recommendation
Need to address concept of assemblies (design,
planning, and manufacturing) in PDM/AP218
SCIM.
Address assembly in PDM chapter, i.e., solve in
PDM. Specialize in other chapters (e.g.,
structures) if needed.
There needs to be a npd:physical_occurrence for
each npd:design_occurrence as the ship moves
from design to manufacturing. They are linked via
association:
npd:Design_occurrence_physical_occurrence.
The npd:Physical_assembly is linked to the
npd:Physical_occurrence by the associations:
npd:Physical_assembly_child
npd:Physical_assembly_parent
Discuss how to represent build trees.
Recommend adding AP218 entity assembly to
AP218 SCIM. Subtype AP218 entity assembly from
npd:Physical_occurrence.
Consider adding a lightweight arrangements
concept in PDM or even move AP215 to PDM.
The goal is to avoid a separate AP215 export.
Document Number: NSRP-ILE-1.2-002
Rev: 1.0
Document Title: ILE Structural Model Gap Analysis
Gap Category
Missing AP218 & SCIM
planning/manufacturing entities
Issue
The following NN Catia Attributes do not map to SCIM:
CONSTRUC_AREA_LVL
TEMP_STR_CUT_TO_SUIT
TEMP_STR_REQD_LIFT_TYPE
Comments/Recommendation
Need to add to AP218/SCIM
planning/manufacturing entities.
Issue: no mapping to SCIM, no AP 218 entity
available to add to SCIM.
Review for new SCIM chapter based on ISE 4 steel
processing recommendations, especially for Catia
attributes:
Enhance npd:Design_occurrence
The following NN Catia Attributes do not map to SCIM:
ESWBS
COST_CLASS
MATERIAL_COST_CLASS
OP CODE
SECONDARY OP1
SECONDARY OP2
SECONDARY OP3
SECONDARY OP4
Need to add attributes to PDM/SCIM
npd:Design_occurrence.
Electric Boat concurs: add to PDM,
npd:Design_occurrence
This is also needed by planning.
Document1
34
Document Number: NSRP-ILE-1.2-002
Rev: 1.0
Document Title: ILE Structural Model Gap Analysis
Gap Category
PDM change model improvement
Issue
The following NN Catia Attributes do not map to SCIM:
SCIM Analysis chapter
HOLD-UP_01
HOLD-UP_02
HOLD-UP_03
HOLD-UP_04
HOLD-UP_05
HOLD-UP_06
HOLD-UP_07
HOLD-UP_08
HOLD-UP_09
HOLD-UP_10
CONST DWG REMARKS 1
CONST DWG REMARKS 2
REMARKS
The following NN Catia Attributes do not map to SCIM:
Y Axis Shear Area
Z Axis Shear Area
Angle of Main Axis of Inertia
Manufacturing Macro Names
The following NN Catia end cut related Attributes do not map to SCIM:
EndCut 1 Design Macro Name
EndCut 2 Design Macro Name
ENDCUT 1 MFG MACRO NAME
ENDCUT 2 MFG MACRO NAME
Comments/Recommendation
Candidates for improvements to PDM change
model. May need associations to show parts that
hold up other parts.
Consider portions of NIDDESC CM model
incorporated into PDM.
Be sure AP239 does not cover this.
Candidates for AP209 (analysis) chapter.
The CAD system may compute this data. If so it
can be derived from SCIM data. However, if this is
human defined (e.g., section properties), consider
exchanging this in libraries, especially catalog
parts.
Recommend adding
npd:Feature_design_definition.Name property for
this. "Name" currently does not exist.
Robotic macro names are yard specific, therefore
may not be needed for data exchange. Review
endcuts on next row.
Document1
35
Document Number: NSRP-ILE-1.2-002
Rev: 1.0
Document Title: ILE Structural Model Gap Analysis
Gap Category
Endcut definition
Issue
The following NN Catia manufacturing related Attributes do not map to
SCIM:
ENDCUT 1 MFG P00
ENDCUT 1 MFG P01
ENDCUT 1 MFG P02
ENDCUT 1 MFG P03
ENDCUT 1 MFG P04
ENDCUT 1 MFG P05
ENDCUT 1 MFG P06
ENDCUT 1 MFG P07
ENDCUT 1 MFG P08
ENDCUT 1 MFG P09
ENDCUT 1 MFG P10
ENDCUT 1 MFG P11
ENDCUT 1 MFG P12
ENDCUT 1 MFG P13
ENDCUT 1 MFG P14
ENDCUT 1 MFG P15
ENDCUT 1 MFG P16
ENDCUT 1 MFG P17
ENDCUT 1 MFG P18
ENDCUT 1 MFG P19
ENDCUT 1 MFG P20
ENDCUT 1 MFG P21
ENDCUT 1 MFG P22
ENDCUT 1 MFG P23
ENDCUT 1 MFG P24
ENDCUT 2 MFG P00
ENDCUT 2 MFG P01
ENDCUT 2 MFG P02
ENDCUT 2 MFG P03
ENDCUT 2 MFG P04
ENDCUT 2 MFG P05
ENDCUT 2 MFG P06
ENDCUT 2 MFG P07
ENDCUT 2 MFG P08
ENDCUT 2 MFG P09
ENDCUT 2 MFG P10
ENDCUT 2 MFG P11
ENDCUT 2 MFG P12
ENDCUT 2 MFG P13
ENDCUT 2 MFG P14
ENDCUT 2 MFG P15
ENDCUT 2 MFG P16
ENDCUT 2 MFG P17
ENDCUT 2 MFG P18
ENDCUT 2 MFG P19
ENDCUT 2 MFG P20
ENDCUT 2 MFG P21
ENDCUT 2 MFG P22
ENDCUT 2 MFG P23
ENDCUT 2 MFG P24
Document1
36
Comments/Recommendation
Recommend adding to appropriate
npd:Feature_design_definition or subclass. TBD
manufacturing operation needs to be added to
AP218 SCIM, which may be part of structural
manufacturing SCIM chapter.
Need library of endcut definitions taking CPC into
account.
Desire is to handle this in a generic way as
parametric manufacturing features. Consider
including secondary operations in a similar
manner.
Document Number: NSRP-ILE-1.2-002
Rev: 1.0
Document Title: ILE Structural Model Gap Analysis
Gap Category
Hangers
Issue
The following NN Catia hanger related Attributes do not map to SCIM:
Comments/Recommendation
Ensure SCIM can handle hangers:
 Verify AP227 (piping, electrical, and HVAC)
can handle hangers.
 Ensure AP218 can handle hangers within its
scope (manufactured hangers).
 Need to review catalog hangers vice piece
built hangers.
HANGER_ID
HANGER_PART_ID
DWG_NO_OR_SPEC
ASSEMBLY
SYSTEM_DESIGNATOR
DWG NO. OR SPEC DOC
HANGER ASSY NO
Different yards address hangers differently. Some
are more catalog centric. NGSB-GC and NN may
handle hangers as CAD reservations in some
cases, but actually create the hangers in the field.
NGSB-GC has Standard Procedure (SP) books from
which the field decides how to implement a given
hanger. The SP book may give several options for
a given situation. This may be a “don't care” in a
Design to Design exchange, but may be important
in a Design to Manufacturing exchange.
Shipyard/ISPE attributes do not map
to SCIM
Numerous Catia Attributes and ISPE attributes do not map to SCIM.
Document1
37
Further research required. Need to handle
hangers by discipline. Consider a separate
chapter on Outfitting and Furnishings.
Review each occurrence in the raw data,
reevaluate, and disposition.
Document Number: NSRP-ILE-1.2-002
Rev: 1.0
Document Title: ILE Structural Model Gap Analysis
4.0
Reference Documents
Document Number /
Number Revision
Document Title
[1]
NSRP-ILE-1.2-001, V1.4,
5 November 2010
Structural Model Import Requirements
[2]
ISO 10303-218:2004(E):
2004-11-15
STEP AP 218
ISO 10303-218
Industrial automation systems and integration - Product
data representation and exchange Part 218: Application protocol: Ship structures
[3]
27 January 2003
Integrated Steel Processing Environment (ISPE)
Shipyard Requirements Final Report
[4]
N/A
SCIM Chapter 4: Structural (AP 218)
Structural_001.zip:
AP218_Structural.pdf (text)
AP218 diagrams.doc (context diagrams)
at URL:
http://www.isetools.org/eb-cgibin/yabb2_ISE/YaBB.pl?num=1222711663
expanded_context_schema_pdm_218_merged_009.xml
at URL:
http://www.isetools.org/eb-cgibin/yabb2_ISE/YaBB.pl?num=1257110616
Document1
38
Document Number: NSRP-ILE-1.2-002
Rev: 1.0
Document Title: ILE Structural Model Gap Analysis
5.0
Terminology
5.1
Acronyms
The following is a list of all acronyms used in this document:
Acronym
Definition
DWG
Drawing
2D
two dimensional
3D
three dimensional
AP
Application Protocol
CAD
Computer-Aided Design
CATIA
Computer Aided Three-Dimensional Application
CVN21
CVN21 is the project name used by the U.S. Navy, its contractors, and
Congress to denote the development of the next design in supercarriers.
CVN 21 is a reference to the next class fixed wing nuclear carrier (CVN) for
the 21st Century.
DDG 1000
USS Zumwalt (DDG-1000) is the lead ship of the Zumwalt class of guided
missile destroyers.
ILE
Integrated Logistics Environment
ILS
Integrated Logistics Support
IPDE
Integrated Product Data Environment
ISE
Integrated Shipbuilding Environment
ISE-4
Fourth ISE project addressing four areas: Electrical, Engineering Analysis,
Ship Arrangement, and Steel Processing (CAD to CAM)
ISO
International Organization for Standardization
ISPE
Integrated Steel Processing Environment
Mfg
manufacturing
NGSB
Northrop Grumman ShipBuilding
NGSB-GC
Northrop Grumman Shipbuilding – Gulf Coast
NGSB-NN
Northrop Grumman Shipbuilding – Newport News
NGTS
Northrop Grumman Technical Services
NPDI
Navy Product Data Initiative
NSRP
National Shipbuilding Research Program
PDM
Product Data Management
Document1
39
Document Number: NSRP-ILE-1.2-002
Rev: 1.0
Document Title: ILE Structural Model Gap Analysis
Acronym
Definition
PREP
preparation
SCIM
Ship Common Information Model
STEP
Standard for the Exchange of Product Model Data, is a comprehensive ISO
standard (ISO 10303) that describes how to represent and exchange digital
product information.
Document1
40