Coastal Stabilization Structures

advertisement
Ocean 100 Online Case Study: Coastal Stabilization Structures
by Al Trujillo
During a lecture on coastal
stabilization structures
(breakwaters, groins, and
jetties), Professor Waters
described a coastal city that
planned to build a boat
anchorage for sailboats.
Professor Waters said,
“Initially, the city had a
straight coastline (Figure 1).
Studies suggested that if they
built any coastal structure
within the surf zone, it would
interrupt the flow of sand
along the beach, so they
decided to build a breakwater
out beyond the surf zone.”
The professor explained, “A
breakwater is a hard structure
composed of rocky, blocky materials that is firmly attached to the sea floor. It is a few feet above sea level and is
designed to break incoming waves, thus creating quiet water behind for a boat anchorage.”
Professor Waters continued,
“A short time after the
breakwater was built, a bulge
of sand formed on the beach
(Figure 2, Deposition) along
with an equally large area of
erosion just downstream
(Figure 2, Erosion). This was an
unexpected consequence of
building the breakwater and
the city did not like the
change. In fact, the city
wanted to get back to a
straight shoreline.”
“Here’s where you come in,”
said the professor. “With your
knowledge of coastal
stabilization structures, what
ideas do you have for helping this city to return its shoreline to a straight shoreline?” Professor Waters told the
students that like most things in life, there are some rules:
1. Some kind of a boat anchorage must remain.
2. The boat anchorage must adequately protect the sailboats from wave damage.
3. Coastal structures can be moved, added, modified, or eliminated.
4. Don’t just pass the problem along downcoast (you must be a good neighbor!).
5. The least expensive idea is best.
1
Amy offered the first idea. She said, “Why don’t they just cut a hole in the middle of the breakwater or break it
up into parts? That way, sand could get through to the beach and the erosion would fill in.”
Bridgette had a different idea. “Actually, if they just changed the breakwater to make it a floating breakwater,
then they could move it to different parts of the coast and they wouldn’t have either the deposition or the
erosion,” she said triumphantly.
Charles expressed his thoughts. “I don’t think altering the breakwater is a good idea. How about this: If they put
a groin to the right of the erosion, it would fill in the erosion with sand because a groin causes upstream
deposition,” he explained. “Then, if they put a second groin to the left of the deposition, it would cause
downstream erosion and thus eliminate the bulge of sand behind the breakwater. Maybe they could remove the
groins when the shoreline was straight again.”
Damien shared his perspective about the problem. “Why don’t they just build a boat harbor with jetties to
protect the harbor entrance?” he asked. “The best place would be to the left of the deposition. That way, the
jetties would cause downstream erosion and thus the deposition would disappear.”
Eva offered, “I think they should just move the sand from the deposition to the erosion. This could be done with
a suction dredge or even a bulldozer. Maybe to save money, they should make prison inmates move the sand
with shovels and buckets.”
Then Fred suggested, “Yeah, but they’re not getting rid of the root of the problem, which is the breakwater in
the first place. Since we can’t eliminate the breakwater, why not move it further offshore? They’d still keep the
anchorage, but it would just be a little further to get to the sailboats.”
Gracie, after hearing all the other ideas, came up with, “I think the breakwater could be designed differently to
still protect the boats, but have a minimum impact on the shoreline. Maybe redesign it into the shape of a
wedge or a circle. That way, the waves could go around it and keep moving the sand down the beach, thus
taking care of both the deposition and the erosion.”
Critically analyze each student’s idea, including its potential drawbacks. Listed below are the students in the
story. Considering the rules established for the exercise, rank each student’s idea from most feasible to least
feasible for helping the city get its shoreline back to a straight shoreline. Give a different score to each
character. Be prepared to explain your choices.
Most feasible idea <― 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ―> Least feasible idea
_____ Amy
_____ Damien
_____ Bridgette
_____ Eva
_____ Charles
_____ Fred
_____ Gracie
Diving deeper: Other than combinations of the student’s ideas, what other ideas do you have for helping the
city return its shoreline to a straight shoreline?
2
Download