CA Country Programme Disaster Resilience Requirements Christian Aid recognises humanitarian work as being central to its identity and part of its core business as set out in P4C and No Small Change. Addressing natural and conflict disaster risks is an integral part of our resilient livelihoods approach in that failure to do so could eradicate livelihood gains built up over several years of successful development interventions when a disaster strikes. This document articulates what we expect to see under the Risk and Resource Management component of CA’s Thriving and Resilient Livelihoods Framework, focussing on the prevention of and appropriate response to disasters. The real value of CA’s approach is in the integration of the different components. We aim to see a DRR approach that is strengthened by factoring in other elements of the framework, as well as development programmes recognising and addressing DRR in their project design. 1. Communities identify and understand the disaster risks they face 2. Community preparedness and response plans are in place and functioning 3. Community Early Warning Systems are in place and functioning 4. Communities engage in disaster mitigation/prevention activities 5. The policy environment enables and supports community disaster risk reduction Participatory analysis with communities includes a discussion about the disaster risks they face, what causes them, and how they have affected, or could affect their lives and livelihoods; this information is used to inform the design of project interventions. Communities should be able to identify the relevant disaster risks in their contexts: Rapid onset: floods, earthquakes, hurricanes, fire etc. Slow onset: drought Conflict: resource-led, national etc Communities are organised to implement the functional aspects of managing an emergency. This may include: Rapid onset/ conflict: community contingency plans, first aid training, emergency simulations/drills, response equipment purchased (lifeboats, torches, radios, food stockpiles etc.) construct cyclone shelters Slow onset: Herd de-stocking plans made with local traders, community water/ pasture management plans Communities have access to, understanding of, and ability to use early warning information including associated mechanisms and equipment to enable an effective response to disaster risks. This might include: Rapid onset: Weather information alerts, upstream – downstream community warning mechanisms Slow onset: short-term climate forecasts, use of traditional indicators Conflict: Access to conflict alerts between villages Communities implement mitigation and prevention measures to reduce the direct effects of a disaster. These could include: Rapid onset: build flood defences, dredge rivers, relocate vulnerable HHs etc. Slow onset: construct grain banks, water harvesting structures; improve pasture quality, animal health etc. Conflict: increase negotiation capacity e.g. promote safe dialogue opportunities between conflicting parties Policy-makers and power-holders ensure that their decisions and actions strengthen community risk reduction and emergency preparedness, including: Budget/policy: government units legislate and allocate funding for community disaster mitigation activities Practice: private sector actors implement risk-aware business models i.e. do not expose communities to increased risks