Share Project Projected Papers: 19th April 2012
This is the landscape of papers we see at this point in the project. Many ideas have been codeveloped, and we will be generous with credit. This means that those who write a paper will be
lead authors; those who contribute (ideas/structure; reviewing/ commenting) will be latter authors;
those who have participated in discussions explicitly acknowledged.
Topic
Place/deadline
Lead authors
Disciplinary Commons “Marker
Paper”
Disciplinary Commons “PCK
paper”
Change Ecology Space paper
JEE Special Issue: 2,000 words,
30th April
Sally & Josh
Teaching networks paper
SRHE conference? 150 word
abstract & 1000 word outline,
29th June
Studies in Higher Education
journal version?
Folk Pedagogy paper
Representations paper
Repertoire increasing activities
Repertoire increasing
behaviours
Design expertise (“collecting”)
Narrative methods
Food paper
Josh, Brad
Some additional analysis – esp
RetroComm – over summer
2012
Brad, Josh, Sally
Sally
Helen & Isobel
Food, Culture & Society
cannot find a word count!!
The Portfolios Themselves
Resolved: We will write nothing worthless.
Sally
Sally & Isobel (Brad)
Repertoire-increasing activities
Repertoire-increasing behaviours – are these when they’re pursuing other goals – (evidence from
geographers (Borgman); toy shop and monkeys change story; teaching is always there, we’re always
inhabiting our teaching identity)
Where is the “now” in teaching? – if you’re a teacher it’s in the moment; if you’re in instructional
design, it’s months – months – in advance. Taylorism, separating head and hand, design and
enactment separated, drawing on different skills. (Martin Fowler – engineering models of s/ware
development, but can’t hand-off design – but can’t separate it out )
Design expertise (“collecting”) – not purposeful, but browsing
Many resources are created with the notion that teachers will search with a problem to solve. We
have not seen them seeking solutions in that way (against Guzdial-Fossati).
Cultivate repertoire-increasing
Two sides of coin “that looks interesting” and the deal-breaking “that would not work for me”
Borgman, C. L., Leazer, G. H., Gilliland-Swetland, A., Millward, K., Champeny, L., Finley, J. and Smart,
L. J. How Geography Professors Select Materials for Classroom Lectures: Implications for the Design
of Digital Libraries. ACM, City, 2004.
Borgman, C. L., Smart, L. J., Millward, K. A., Finley, J. R., Champeny, L., Gilliland, A. J. and Leazer, G.
H. Comparing Faculty Information Seeking in Teaching and Research: Implications for the Design of
Digital Libraries. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56, 6
2005), 636-657.