Leader’s Guide Strategies to Facilitate and Enhance ELLs’ Peer Interactions in the Classroom Session Preparation. Prior to the session, the facilitator may request that participants bring a lesson plan for an upcoming unit or a lesson plan template that they can use during an Action Plan activity. Handouts/Materials: Pre-Planning Analysis handout, Action Plan template Slide number 1. Title: Strategies to facilitate and enhance ELL’s peer-interactions in the classroom 2. Opening Group Brainstorm The facilitator can open up the discussion and encourage participation by inviting participants to brainstorm. Preschool teacher interaction is addressed in another module, so peer interaction will now be considered. The facilitator can write participants’ ideas on an easel or board. 3. Communicative Interactions We know that language facilitation benefits all children, including typically developing children and children with language delays, and that strong language skills are necessary for strong reading achievement. Therefore, the language environment is often included as a domain on assessments of teaching quality, such as the Classroom Assessment Scoring System (CLASS) and the Early Language and Literacy Classroom Observation (ELLCO). Language stimulation is also critical for English language learners. 1 To enhance preschool children’s language growth to the extent possible, we need to think of different environments in which language facilitation can be enhanced. Clearly, the classroom environment is one in which SLP's can work with children using a push-in service delivery model. SLP's have very specific and extensive training in language facilitation techniques, but they typically see children only once or twice a week. Children spend significantly more time with their classroom teachers, yet teachers cannot interact with all children all of the time. Therefore, today we will be talking about how adults can enhance peer interactions to cultivate the richest language learning environments to meet children's needs. 4. Peer Interactions The facilitator can again stress the importance of teacher-child interaction and teachers’ ability to provide rich language stimulation (e.g., expand on and recasts children’s utterances; model new vocabulary, correct grammar, complex grammatical structures), but also acknowledge the logistical limitations in his/her ability to engage in 1:1 conversations with every child each day. However, there are still multiple areas and opportunities for children to receive language stimulation. If the teacher cannot be there, then who can? Peers. 5. Listening and Learning Children learn not only from speech directed to them, but also from observing/listening in on others. 6. Listening and Learning ELLs also learn from their peers. Children with language impairment are not 2 likely learn as much as their typically developing peers, but they, too, learn from peers. 7. Enhancing Peer Interactions Yet, there is more to it than just putting children in close proximity with one another, and more strategy is indeed beneficial for ELLs. English language proficiency (addressed in a previous learning module) will impact children’s interactions, as will other individual personal factors. 8. Additional Variables The facilitator can invite the participants to share their ideas as a large group or to first discuss their ideas with a neighbor and then to share in large group. Discuss both individual characteristics of the ELLs themselves as well as the characteristics of the English monolingual peers. Some examples: Potential individual characteristics of ELLs o Their personality (e.g., introverted, shy, extroverted, outgoing) o Comfort level in the classroom o Play skills o Ability to use cues and context to glean the message o Motivation to interact o Etc. Potential characteristics of English monolingual peers o Patience o Willingness to engage with ELLs despite language differences o Etc. 3 Some ELL students will engage very readily with their English-speaking peers, while others will not engage as readily with their peers. Many English-speaking children will be more reluctant to engage with their ELL peers. Why? It is relatively natural for people to continue communicating with others who meet their expectations for reciprocity and response. When there is a language difference, some children may be less likely to want to continue the interaction. It is not uncommon for a classroom observer to notice that an ELL student routinely is alone and playing independently, or for ELLs of a common language background to engage with each other more than with other English speakers. This is okay at times, because we do not want to push ELLs at beginning stages of English language acquisition into stressful situations. Sometimes they need a safe haven. However, we want to balance those moments with natural and meaningful opportunities for social interaction. That takes planning. 9. Enhancing Peer Interactions Part of high quality early education involves lesson planning for and monitoring of the environment to promote enriching experiences in multiple classroom areas simultaneously. 10. Planning to Support Peer Interactions 11. Pre-Planning Analysis Invite the participants to think about one or more ELL students in their classrooms and note where they tend to see these particular students in their classrooms (if students are allowed to choose their centers). 12. Pre-Planning Analysis 4 How do these particular children play? Some participants may have noticed that certain children always gravitate to the same area, the same activities, by themselves, or with the same children. Invite them to think about types of play. Some children may routinely engage in parallel play, near other children, but not necessarily engaging in communicative interactions with them. In cooperative play, each child is an important part of the interaction. 13. Personal Brainstorming Example The facilitator can invite the participants to think about their own experiences. For example, ask if anyone has been to a social event in which it was difficult meet and interact with other attendees. What made it difficult? What could the host have done to help? The facilitator can also have participants imagine that they are planning a party for someone who would love a variety of people there, including family, friends, and coworkers. Some of those invitees might be other married couples, some of those invitees might be single, some might have children, and some might not. In other words, there might be many types of people that the host or hostess wants to invite, and yet, wants everyone to enjoy themselves and mingle rather than to cluster off into their usual groups. A good host plans some ways to facilitate some social interaction. Give the participants time to think and discuss in pairs before discussing in large group. For example, you might introduce two friends and point out something they have in common, such as “You are both from Chicago and big Cub fans.” Perhaps you point out that two people are in the same line of work or share a hobby. Perhaps you know a couple of people who attended that party by themselves, and you think they 5 might feel more comfortable if given a task to help out. So, you might ask two or more people if they could both help finish up some appetizers, which might also give them a reason to interact with each other. After sharing, the facilitator can then summarize the concept that planning can serve to facilitate interactions between ELLs and their peers. 14. Planning Engaging in peer interactions may be easy for some children and more difficult for others. Therefore, think about some ways in which we can make positive peer interactions more likely to happen; for example, modifying the environment, using strategic grouping, presenting activities, and incorporating teacher support. 15. Enabling context/environment Reiterate the importance of teacher interaction with preschool children within centers, yet the benefit of facilitating interaction when the teacher cannot be in that center. Some locations or centers are more suitable for rich communicative interactions than others. Invite participants to think about and share their thoughts about this. Acknowledge that children’s free choice is valued in early childhood education, that children be able to choose what they want to do during center time. The facilitator can clarify that the concept of planning is not to control children’s play, but rather, to offer and facilitate additional enriching opportunities in a way that meets children’s learning needs. There is a balance. The facilitator can also remind the participants that it is okay if ELLs need some quiet, low-stress time, particularly children in pre-production and early production stages (discussed in a previous learning module) of English acquisition, 6 and that children also appear to learn from listening to the talk around them, even if it is not directed to them. Again, there is a balance, such that ELLs are not always on their own. Invite the participants to think about noise level in the environment. For example, there may be two adjacent areas in a classroom which tend to be louder than other areas in the room. Noise level can impact language learning, particularly for ELLs when trying to listen to and comprehend English. 16. Strategic Grouping Discuss how children may have more positive interactions with certain peers than with others. Children, of course, must learn to get along with everyone; however, for purposes of facilitating enhanced communicative interactions, strategic grouping for certain activities can be very beneficial. Some children may be more supportive, better turn-takers, etc. Encourage the participants to think about their classrooms and students as specifically as possible. Next, we want ELLs not only to listen and learn but also use their expressive language skills when they can. The ideal number of peers for grouping may depend on the particular child and his/her English proficiency skills. A child with emerging English skills may be more likely to communicate with a supportive peer in a 1:1 interaction and less likely to communicate in a group. Other children may feel less pressure and be more likely to verbalize when lots of children around him/her are also talking. The more teachers can observe and identify these facilitators, the more effectively they will be able to plan. 17. Activities 7 In which interactive activities is the ELL student most interested? Students may be more likely to communicate in activities in which they are interested, so these might be activities in which you use strategic grouping. 18. Pre-Teaching to Support ELLs’ Comprehension Pre-teaching of vocabulary words and concepts before storybook reading, for example, is a common strategy intended to support ELLs’ comprehension. If teachers are already familiar with this strategy, you can discuss how this same strategy can also be implemented to support children’s comprehension of their peers’ language during particular play activities. Many preschool teachers introduce centers before children choose them by explaining what is in the center, how it relates to what they are learning in class, rules for participation, and so forth. Similarly, teachers may pre-teach words and concepts to support their ELL students. For the block center, for example, English speaking children with typical language skills will likely already know many words associated with the materials. Children with emerging English skills, however, will benefit from some pre-teaching (e.g., block, big, small, please, fall). Teachers can tailor the targeted vocabulary and phrases according to the level at which the child will be successful. 19. Teacher Support/Scaffolding to Support ELLs’ Production Engaging in peer interactions is easier for some children and more difficult for others. Less teacher support may be required for the former, and more teacher support may be required for the latter. The facilitator can again remind the audience that if there is a group of ELLs of 8 the same language background in a classroom, it is natural for them to want to play with each other. This is beneficial, as we know that children learn a great deal from play and conversing with each other. The language and cognitive level involved in their interactions may be much higher, as we want to encourage that. At the same time, the idea is to provide a variety of rich opportunities for learning and to help children develop strong skills in both languages. So, again, planning ways to foster language learning environments in the classroom is important. To promote inclusion, the teacher may help assign roles or prompts that are integral to the play activity. Children may benefit from pre-teaching of some key phrases that they may have difficulty generating on their own and that they can use successfully and meaningfully in the play interaction. If children are playing store and the ELL student is the cashier, for example, the teacher could pre-teach a key phrase such as, “One dollar please.” The teacher may observe that a child needs help expressing her/her ideas and feelings during a play interaction, so the teacher may prompt the child, “Tell Sarah…” These key phrases can be based on the child’s English proficiency level, as discussed in a previous module. Some children will be successful with gestures and single words, whereas other children who have had more time to acquire English will be successful with longer utterances. The goal is to offer a prompt that the child will be successful producing. The facilitator can give the participants a few minutes to think about and write down some phrases that might benefit their ELLs during peer interactions. Finally, the teacher may initially decide to stay with that group of children for a 9 prolonged period of time to facilitate and ensure successful interaction. Teachers, of course, cannot be in all places at all times, so the teacher can provide some initial support in a group and then fade his/her presence and rotate to another group, checking in again periodically. This is similar to what good hosts/hostesses do. 20. Routines We know that all children benefit from routines. Routines help children make predictions, reduce the fear and anxiety of the unknown, and help children feel secure. This is particularly important for many ELLs, particularly those in the pre-production stage and initially enrolled in an unfamiliar, English-speaking classroom. Routines help support children’s language comprehension and serve to give them time and multiple opportunities to practice, refine, and expand on new language skills. Therefore, ELLs may benefit from multiple opportunities to experience and participate in a given center activity with their strategic peer grouping. As children are successful, the teacher may provide new vocabulary and key phrases to help them expand their conversational language and play while reinforcing targeted learning objectives of the preschool curriculum. 21. Action Plan At this point in the session, the facilitator can give the participants some time to develop and write their individual action plan. If participants have brought an upcoming lesson plan or lesson plan template, they can tailor it by incorporating specific strategies that have been discussion during the session. The more concrete the plan, the easier it will be for participants to attempt to implement it after this session. 10 Next, invite the participants to discuss their plans and help each other brainstorm and problem-solve in small groups. There are always some participants with wonderful and unique ideas that are beneficial for everyone. This can also be a very motivating part of the workshop. In some settings, literacy coaches may be available to help teachers monitor and reflect on their incorporation of ELL strategies. If not, and if the workshop facilitator cannot conduct a later follow-up session, perhaps participants can schedule a follow-up meeting with each other to share their findings, discuss their progress, and problem-solve. 22. Large Group Sharing Once the participants have had the opportunity to plan and discuss their ideas in small group, the facilitator can invite them to share in large group. Again, this can be particularly beneficial and motivating for participants. 23. Summary After summarizing the key points, the facilitator offers time for questions. 24. Optional Follow-up sessions are beneficial to promoting participants’ incorporation of presented strategies into their practice and for trouble-shooting. 11