Registration and login related design/function Design/Function: Guest access Validation: Example: https://secure2.homedepot.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/CheckoutSignIn?orderId=93855664 &checkItems=false&storeId=10051&previousPage=&catalogId=10053&langId=-1 Module listing and search Design/Function: Showcasing Filmstrip or Slideshow Validation: Example: www.pepsi.com or BBC day in pictures or http://www.epicurious.com/recipesmenus?mbid=rss_epinr Social web layers Design/Function: Rating system Validation: Example: www.pandora.com Design/Function: Sharable Folders Validation: Example: Blackboard or WebCT, maybe Moodle (not sure) Design/Function: How many people are online right now… and where they are from (country only) Validation: Example: Similar to http://inside/dashboard/ User specific customization design/function Design/Function: Tag pieces of modules for "My MetEd" Validation: Example: http://www.sesamestreet.org – My Street Design/Function: Annotation of flash content Validation: Example: http://www.Youtube.com Design/Function: Copy flash content to a clipboard Validation: Example: http://www.pepsicochallenge.com Non-module related content management Design/Function: My MetEd Validation: Example: http://my.yahoo.com Design/Function: Build your own student checklist or quiz Validation: Example: http://dafekt1ve.tadalist.com/lists/1393792/public General usability and interface design Design/Function: Mini Module Preview Validation: Example: http://www.flickr.com/explore/interesting/7days/ Design/Function: Different Highlight on reload Validation: Example: http://www.flickr.com/ Other Design/Function: Validation: Example: Recommendation 1: COMET should continue to work toward an architecture and modularization plan to underlie designs, making compatibility and multi-contexting of lesson elements easier to achieve. Recommendation 2: COMET should ensure that the production/development process includes a design for migration and maintenance of existing materials. Recommendation 3: COMET should encourage its sponsors to begin collecting and sharing data on field performance improvement following instruction. COMET should explore the use of new research methodologies including design based and qualitative research to achieve this. Recommendation 4: In its next strategic plan COMET should include an extended outlook regarding priorities and issues related to capacity (innovation, production, and maintenance). Recommendation 1: COMET should begin discussions with sponsors to establish crossreferenced training skill levels and module structures that facilitate usage at multiple skill levels. The ability to search for an object and a skill level at the same time is very valuable in the training process. Recommendation 2: COMET should consider looking for opportunities to include training on probabilistic forecasting (ensembles) into forthcoming modules where appropriate. Recommendation 3: COMET should have optional pre and post assessment tests for all modules to better measure the “value” or “effectiveness” of distance learning. Metrics of the pre and post scores should be provided to sponsors. Recommendation 4: COMET should allow sponsors limited access to upcoming activities. Recommendation 5: COMET should continue to identify opportunities to broaden its customer base to the private sector and other non-traditional sponsors (e.g., DOE, Sierra Club, charitable foundations, industry associations, emergency management organizations, etc.)” Recommendation 1: COMET should work with sponsors to facilitate the integration of the following areas of advances in science and technology into COMET modules: Radio Occultation/COSMIC Dual Polarization Radar Phased Array Radar Data Assimilation Data Synthesis Alternative / Renewable Energy GI&S AWIPS-2 Recommendation 2: COMET should consider including in its future development priorities modules dealing with: Climate/Climate Change and Effects Earth Observing and System Modeling Global Monitoring of Climate Change Integrated Observing Networks Oceanic Processes and Their Effects Recommendation 3: COMET should work with sponsors to identify support for future modules that deal with societal impacts of weather, oceanic phenomena, and climate. Recommendation 4: COMET should work with its sponsors to prioritize and expand if necessary the attached list of emerging areas worthy of exploration over the next 5-10 years. Recommendation 1: COMET should continue to explore the use of new virtual classroom activities and should investigate new technologies to conduct this training, being especially sensitive to software compatibilities of sponsors. Recommendation 2: COMET should continue to study the comparative values of incorporating new Web technologies and services especially those that facilitate social interaction of developers, instructors, students, and experts in instructional conversations. Recommendation 3: COMET should explore the idea of producing materials for specific user groups in such a way that they can be tailored and exported for blended learning solutions. Recommendation 4: COMET should continue to mine their user data base information to understand the user community, and effectiveness of their educational products. Recommendation 5a: COMET should dedicate a portion of every project budget to support the exploration of new media forms and instructional methods. Recommendation 5b: COMET should dedicate a portion of project budgets to life cycle maintenance for selected products and should maintain a dialogue with the sponsors to quantify the allocation of resources required for life cycle maintenance. Recommendation 6a: COMET should pursue opportunities to involve active researchers and operational scientists as SMEs in the design of modules that pertain to their research. Recommendation 6b: COMET should take advantage of the opportunities of both cooperative and partner projects to contribute to COMET educational materials. Recommendation 7: COMET should integrate a formal planning strategy as a guide for early estimation of design and production costs and risk assessment (e.g., “Staff Planning Process”). Recommendation 8: COMET should provide training opportunities and resources for faculty and instructors on how to use COMET educational materials effectively. Recommendation 9: COMET should provide catalogs of educational resources, and their key features. This catalog should cross-reference educational resources closely related in subject matter (ontology service). Recommendation 1: Translations COMET should: Continue with the current level of translations and pursue sources of additional funding Establish a methodology for translating material to make the translation process more efficient, and to support other institutions to contribute to these efforts. Revise the process for determining which modules will be translated and whether it is worthwhile to translate the entire module Consider on a regular basis whether the cost of localization can be justified Recommendation 2: WMO Support COMET should: Build upon the planned MOU to clarify its role with WMO (e.g., Increase cooperation with WMO Virtual Laboratory for Satellite Meteorology Training, particularly the monthly international weather discussions) Work with WMO to bring parties together to establish aviation requirements and the role that COMET modules can play in delivering training Provide ideas on how WMO-258 could be improved with emphasis on the benefits of specifying learning outcomes Recommendation 3: Distance Learning Programs Considering the adequacy of COMET’s response to the Panel’s concerns from last year, COMET should continue to play a supporting role in the quest to expand opportunities for university training and education worldwide. Recommendation 4: Potential New Roles/Partners COMET should: Explore the business case for offering international virtual courses Expand its role in teaching the design process for those developing their own materials, as well as in teaching distance learning practices Continue making efforts to find new partners