High-pressure effects on the activity of cathepsins B and D of
19
20
21
16
17
18
22
23
28
29
30
31
24
25
26
27
32
33
10
11
12
13
14
15
8
9
6
7
3
4
5
1
2
High-pressure effects on the activity of cathepsins B and D of mackerel and horse mackerel muscle
Liliana Fidalgo
1
, Jorge A. Saraiva
1
, Santiago P. Aubourg
2 , Manuel Vázquez 3
, J.
Antonio Torres
4
1
Research Unit of Organic Chemistry, Natural and Agro-food Products (QOPNA),
Chemistry Department, Aveiro University, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-
193 Aveiro, Portugal.
2
Department of Food Technology, Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas (CSIC), Vigo,
Spain.
3
Department of Analytical Chemistry, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Lugo, Spain.
4
Food Processing Engineering Group, Department of Food Science and Technology,
Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA.
Abstract:
This work sought to determine high pressure processing effects on the activity of cathepsins B and D in the muscle of mackerel ( Scomber scombrus ) and horse mackerel
( Trachurus trachurus ). In mackerel, the cathepsin B activity decrease reached 40% while in horse mackerel, low and intermediate pressures (150 and 300 MPa) caused an activity increase (30%) but a decrease of up to 60% at 450 MPa. In both species, cathepsin D activity increased after a 300 MPa treatment (up to 2-fold for mackerel and
60% for horse mackerel) while decreasing after a 450 MPa treatment. The activity increase is probably due to pressure treatment damage of lysosome releasing enzymes into the fish muscle. Based on the high-pressure processing effects on the activity of cathepsins B and D, 450 MPa may be used to reduce the proteolytic activity of cathepsin B prior to chilled or frozen storage of these fish species.
Keywords: High hydrostatic pressure, Scomber scombrus, Trachurus trachurus , cathepsins B and D
1
51
52
53
54
47
48
49
50
43
44
45
46
39
40
41
42
55
56
61
62
63
64
57
58
59
60
65
66
67
34
35
36
37
38
INTRODUCTION
Small pelagic fish species, such as Atlantic mackerel ( Scomber scombrus ) and horse mackerel ( Trachurus trachurus ), are important fishery resources in many coastal areas
in the South European countries (M BARKI et al.
2009). Atlantic mackerel is a fatty fish
(fat content higher than 10%), while horse mackerel ( Trachurus trachurus ) is a medium-fatty fish (fat content between 5 to 10%). Both species are abundant in the
Northeast Atlantic (A UBOURG et al.
been attracting great attention because of its moderate price and large quantities captured by most West-European countries (Holland, Ireland, Spain, France, Germany
For the consumer, freshness is the most important quality aspect in raw fish, this defining the quality of fish as food. Loss of freshness is caused by a combination of physical, biochemical, and microbiological reactions. Enzymatic degradations cause the postmortem softening of fish muscle and facilitate the proliferation of bacterial flora
2006; H ERNÁNDEZ -A NDRÉS et al.
Cathepsins are one of the characterized proteolytic systems known to hydrolyze myofibrillar proteins during postmortem
found widely distributed in muscles and organs. After death and during muscle storage, cathepsins B and D may be released from the lysosomal matrix into both the cytoplasm
and the intracellular spaces as a consequence of lysosomes breakdown (B
showing an optimal pH for activity around 6.0 (N IELSEN et al.
aspartic acidic protease, is considered the most important enzyme in the postmortem degradation of muscle because of its optimum pH and the absence of a specific inhibitor
High-pressure processing (HPP) is now a commercially well-established new food preservation technology and an effective alternative to thermal treatments or the use of
chemical preservatives (C HÉRET et al.
food processing are of great interest because of the ability to inactivate food borne
microorganisms and endogenous enzymes (C
2
77
78
79
80
73
74
75
76
81
82
83
84
85
90
91
92
93
94
86
87
88
89
95
96
97
98
99
100
68
69
70
71
72
while preserving the nutritional and sensory attributes of foods (W
2008). However, HPP can affect also proteins, particularly myofibrillar proteins,
resulting in structural modifications and texture changes in muscle foods
1999). In addition, HPP can disrupt lysosomal membranes causing
the release into the fish muscle of enzymes, such as cathepsins, leading to possible
alterations of myofibrillar proteins mediated by these enzymes (O HMORI et al.
HPP treatment effects on fish muscle depend on several factors causing activation or inactivation of muscle enzymes. For instance, studies have shown that HPP treatment causes an activity increase of cathepsin B at 500 MPa, while cathepsin D activity would increase after a pressure treatment up to 300 MPa and decrease at higher pressures
2005). However in cold-smoked salmon, cathepsin B activity was
reduced by treatments at pressures up to 300 MPa (L
During processing and storage of fish, quality declines as a result of several factors.
Freezing and frozen storage of fish have been largely used to retain their sensory and
nutritional properties before consumption (E
problems caused/promoted by fish endogenous enzymes occurring during frozen
ff -taste and a dry and tough texture
1997). The successful applications of HPP in other food systems
suggest this technology as a potential treatment to minimize changes that occur during the frozen storage of fish. However, the effect of HPP treatment on fish muscle is still poorly studied, particularly enzymes with proteolytic activity. Thus, the aim of this work was to determine the effect of HPP treatments on the activity of cathepsins B and
D in mackerel and horse mackerel muscles, and to evaluate whether HPP could be used to improve fish quality by reducing their proteolytic activity in Atlantic mackerel and horse mackerel before freezing and subsequent frozen storage.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Preparation of samples
Atlantic mackerel ( Scomber scombrus ) and Atlantic horse mackerel ( Treachusrus trachurus ) caught near the Bask coast in Northern Spain (Ondarroa harbor, Bizkaia,
Spain) were transported under refrigeration to the AZTI Tecnalia (Derio, Spain) pilot plant for HPP treatment. Whole mackerel (28-33 cm and 230-280 g range) and whole
3
126
127
128
129
122
123
124
125
130
131
132
133
134
118
119
120
121
114
115
116
117
110
111
112
113
106
107
108
109
101
102
103
104
105 horse mackerel individuals (25-30 cm and 200-250 g range) were placed in flexible polyethylene bags (three individuals per bag) and vacuum sealed at 400 mbar.
Treatments
Whole fish were treated by high pressure in a 55-L high pressure unit (WAVE
6000/55HT; NC Hyperbaric, Burgos, Spain) at 150, 300 and 450 MPa with 0.0, 2.5 and
5 min holding time (the 0.0 min holding time samples were carried out to study the effect of just the pressure come-up and depressurizing time). Non-pressure treated samples (controls) were also studied. The pressurizing medium was water applied at 3
MPa.s
-1
, yielding come up times of 50, 100 and 150 s for treatments at 150, 300 and 450
MPa, respectively while decompression time took less than 3 s. Pressurizing water was cooled down to maintain room temperature (20 ºC) conditions during HPP treatment.
Enzymatic activity
Preparation of enzyme extract
The preparation of enzymatic extract was performed by the methodology used by
(2005). Samples (10 g) were homogenized with 50 mL ice cold
distilled water for 2 min and the homogenate allowed standing in ice for 30 min with occasional stirring. After 30 min, the homogenate was centrifuged at 14,600 g at 4 ºC for
20 min. The supernatant (used as cathepsins extract) was filtered through a filter
(Whatman nº1) and stored at -20 ºC prior to enzymatic activity quantifications.
Cathepsins activity
The activity of cathepsin B was assayed by the methodology described by
(2005). Enzyme extract (0.1 mL) and 0.1 mL of substrate solution
(0.0625 mM of Z-Arg-Arg-7-amido-4-methylcoumarin hydrochloride in 100 mM Bis-
Tris buffer, with 20 mM EDTA and 4 mM dithiothreitol, pH 6.5) were incubated at 37
ºC during 5 min. The reaction was stopped by the addition of 1 mL 3% SDS (w/v) in 50 mM Bis-Tris (pH 7.0) and the fluorescence of 7-amino-4-methylcoumarin (AMC) liberated was measured (excitation: 360 nm, emission: 460 nm). Cathepsin B activity was expressed as FU.min
-1
.g
-1
. Three replicates were performed for each treatment.
Cathepsin D activity assay was based on the procedure described by B UCKOW et al.
(2010), with small modifications. Enzyme extract (0.2 mL) was mixed with 0.6 mL of
substrate solution, 2% denatured hemoglobin (w/v) in 200 mM citrate buffer (pH 3.7),
4
135
136
137
138
139
152
153
154
155
148
149
150
151
144
145
146
147
140
141
142
143
156
157
162
163
164
165
158
159
160
161
166
167 and incubated at 37 ºC during 3 h. The reaction was stopped by the addition of 0.6 mL
10% trichloroacetic acid (w/v). After vigorous stirring, the precipitate was removed by centrifugation (13,000 rpm, 15 min) and the soluble peptides measured at 280 nm.
Cathepsin D activity was expressed as µg tyrosine.min
-1
.g
-1
. Three replicates were performed for each treatment.
Statistical analysis
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Fisher’s Least Significant Difference
(LSD) Test was used to identify differences between treatments. Differences between treatments were considered significant when p < 0.05. Results are reported as mean values ± standard deviation.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Cathepsin B
The activity of cathepsin B in non-processed samples (controls) was 218839 ± 13147 and 13302 ± 360 FU.min
-1
.g
-1
for mackerel and horse mackerel, respectively (Table 1),
i.e., about 16-fold higher for mackerel than for horse mackerel.
Fig. 1 and 2 show the effect of the HPP treatments on cathepsin B activity on mackerel
and horse mackerel, respectively. In mackerel, significant differences were observed in
HPP treated samples compared with the control, being the activity significantly (p <
0.05) lower for the processed samples with the exception of samples treated at 150
MPa/2.5 min and 300 MPa/5 min, for which no statistical difference was observed.
Generally, a gradual decrease in the activity of cathepsin B was observed when the
pressure level was increased, up to around 40% both at 300 and 450 MPa (
Fig. 1 A). Activity increased for the 150 MPa for 2.5 min and at 300 MPa for 2.5 and 5
min treatments. Globally, a higher effect of pressure level as compared to pressure holding time was observed, except for 300 MPa, for which the activity increased significantly with pressure holding time.
In horse mackerel, low and intermediate pressures (150 and 300 MPa for 0 min) caused
an enzyme activity increase of up to 30% (
Fig. 2 ), with a decrease being observed for 2.5 and 5 min reaching an activity value
lower than the control for 150 MPa/5 min and equal for the 300 MPa for 2.5 and 5 min
5
168
169
170
171
172
177
178
179
180
173
174
175
176
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
Fig. 2 B). For 450 MPa, the activity of the HPP samples was lower than the control,
regardless of the holding time.
Comparing the results for the two species, the main conclusions could be expressed as follows. The intermediate pressure levels (150 and 300 MPa) showed a lower effect on activity of cathepsin B in horse mackerel as compared to mackerel. Pressure holding time increased the activity in mackerel and decreased it in horse mackerel. Pressuretreated mackerel showed an activity lower and up to equal to that of the control, while for horse mackerel intermediate pressure levels caused an increase in activity. For both species, the higher pressure level studied (450 MPa) caused a significant decrease in cathepsin B and D activity.
In general, the results observed for the effect of pressure on cathepsin B are in
agreement with those reported by other authors. For instance, C HÉRET et al.
observed that when sea bass muscle is pressurized at 300 MPa for 5 min, the activity of cathepsin B slightly increased, being this explained by the possible release of the
(1996) applied HPP treatments (300 MPa for
30 min) on sheephead and bluefish cathepsin C, having observed that the activity decreases up to 80% and 91%, respectively.
Cathepsin D
The activity of cathepsin D in horse mackerel is higher (about 50%) than in mackerel
while the reverse was observed for cathepsin B (Table 1 ).
In mackerel, all treatments caused a statistically significant (p < 0.05) increase in the activity of cathepsin D for mackerel, with the exception of 150 MPa/2.5 min and 450 MPa/5 min for which treatments no effects were observed
The activity increase was higher for 300 MPa, reaching more than 2-fold for 5 min, compared to the control. Pressure holding time showed small effects on activity when a 150 MPa treatment was applied; however, a 300 MPa treatment led to a significant increase, while a 450 MPa previous treatment provoked an activity decrease.
For horse mackerel, similar results than for mackerel were obtained (
197
198
199
200
201
Fig. 4). In general, activity increased with pressure except for 150 MPa/5 min, 300
MPa/0 min, and 450 MPa/0 and 2.5 min treatments. Similar results to those obtained in this work for cathepsin D of mackerel and horse mackerel were obtained for sardine
2008) and sea bass (C HÉRET et al.
2005) muscle. For instance, C HÉRET et al.
(2005) observed that pressure treatments at 300 MPa increased
6
202
203
204
205
206
219
220
221
222
215
216
217
218
211
212
213
214
207
208
209
210
223
224
229
230
231
232
225
226
227
228
233
234 the activity of cathepsin D, while for higher pressure levels the activity decreased to values similar to those obtained when a 100 MPa pressure was applied. These results can be hypothetically explained by the liberation of the enzyme from the lysosomes, which appears to be the dominant effect at lower pressures and shorter holding times
2000), while at higher pressures enzyme inactivation would prevail. Results
obtained point out the occurrence of two effects of pressure treatments on the activity of cathepsin D. At lower pressures (150 MPa and 300 MPa), activity increases, possibly because of enzyme release from the lysosomes into the fish muscle while at higher pressure (450 MPa) the activity decreases, possibly due to a higher on cathepsin D pressure inactivation effect, over its release from lysosomes.
CONCLUSION
In general, lower pressures and shorter pressure holding times caused cathepsin B and D activity increases, while higher pressures/longer pressure holding times had the opposite effect. The former effect can be attributed to enzyme release from lysosomes while the latter may reflect pressure inactivation. HPP reduced cathepsin B activity in mackerel and horse mackerel, in all cases for the former and at 450 MPa for the latter. For cathepsin D, all pressure treatments studied resulted in an equal or higher enzyme activity as compared to the control. In conclusion, pressure treatments studied in this work (150, 300 and 450 MPa, with holding times of 0, 2.5 and 5 min) can reduce the endogenous cathepsin B activity of mackerel and horse mackerel and thus opening the possibility for a better quality retention during subsequent chilled or frozen storage preservation; however such activity inhibition was not observed for cathepsin D.
Acknowledgements
To the Xunta de Galicia (Spain) for financing the Project 10TAL402001PR (2010-
2012) and Research Unit 62/94 QOPNA (project PEst-C/QUI/UI0062/2011).
References
A NGSUPANICH K., E DDE M., L EDWARD D.A.
(1999): Effects of high pressure on the myofibrillar proteins of cod and turkey muscle. Journal of Agricultural and
Food Chemistry, 47 : 92-99.
7
262
263
264
265
258
259
260
261
266
267
254
255
256
257
250
251
252
253
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
239
240
241
242
235
236
237
238
A OKI T., Y OKONO M., U ENO R.
(2002): A cathepsin B-like enzyme from mackerel white muscle is a precursor of cathepsin B. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology - Part B: Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, 133 : 307-
316.
A SHIE I.N.A., S IMPSON B.K.
(1996): Application of high hydrostatic pressure to control enzyme related fresh seafood texture deterioration. Food
Research International, 29 : 569-575.
A SHIE I.N.A., S IMPSON B.K.
(1997): Proteolysis in food myosystems - A review.
Journal of Food Biochemistry, 21 : 91-123.
A UBOURG S.P.
(1999): Lipid damage detection during the frozen storage of an underutilized fish species. Food Research International, 32 : 497-502.
A UBOURG S.P., P IÑEIRO C., G ALLARDO J.M., B ARROS -V ELAZQUEZ J.
(2005):
Biochemical changes and quality loss during chilled storage of farmed turbot ( Psetta maxima ). Food Chemistry, 90 : 445-452.
B ECHET D., T ASSA A., T AILLANDIER D., C OMBARET L., A TTAIX D.
(2005): Lysosomal proteolysis in skeletal muscle. The International Journal of Biochemistry
& Cell Biology, 37 : 2098-2114.
B UCKOW R., T RUONG B.Q., V ERSTEEG C.
(2010): Bovine cathepsin D activity under high pressure. Food Chemistry, 120 : 474-481.
C ASTRO S.M., S ARAIVA J.A., D OMINGUES F.M.J., D ELGADILLO I.
(2011): Effect of mild pressure treatments and thermal blanching on yellow bell peppers
( Capsicum annuum L.
). LWT - Food Science and Technology, 44 : 363-
369.
C ASTRO S.M., S ARAIVA J.A., L OPES DA -S ILVA J.A., D ELGADILLO I., L OEY A.V.,
S MOUT C., H ENDRICKX M.
(2008): Effect of thermal blanching and of high pressure treatments on sweet green and red bell pepper fruits ( Capsicum annuum L.
). Food Chemistry, 107 : 1436-1449.
C HAIJAN M., B ENJAKUL S., V ISESSANGUAN W., F AUSTMAN C.
(2005): Changes of pigments and color in sardine ( Sardinella gibbosa ) and mackerel
( Rastrelliger kanagurta ) muscle during iced storage. Food Chemistry, 93 :
607-617.
C HÉRET R., D ELBARRE -L ADRAT C., L AMBALLERIE -A NTON M., V ERREZ -B AGNIS V.
(2005): High-pressure effects on the proteolytic enzymes of sea bass
8
268
277
278
279
280
281
282
273
274
275
276
269
270
271
272
295
296
297
298
291
292
293
294
299
300
287
288
289
290
283
284
285
286
( Dicentrarchus labrax L.
) fillets. Journal of Agricultural and Food
Chemistry, 53 : 3969-3973.
C HÉRET R., D ELBARRE -L ADRAT C., L AMBALLERIE -A NTON M., V ERREZ -B AGNIS V.
(2007): Calpain and cathepsin activities in post mortem fish and meat muscles. Food Chemistry, 101 : 1474-1479.
C HÉRET R., H ERNÁNDEZ -A NDRÉS A., D ELBARRE -L ADRAT C., L AMBALLERIE M.,
V ERREZ -B AGNIS V.
(2006): Proteins and proteolytic activity changes during refrigerated storage in sea bass ( Dicentrarchus labrax L.
) muscle after high-pressure treatment. European Food Research and
Technology, 222 : 527-535.
E RICKSON M.C.
(1997): Lipid oxidation: Flavor and nutritional quality deterioration in frozen foods. In: Erickson M.C., Hung Y.-C. Quality in frozen food. Chapman & Hall, New York: 141
–173.
FAO (2003): Fishery statistics. Capture production. Yearbook 2001, Food and
Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Rome, 92/1: 250-252.
H ERNÁNDEZ -A NDRÉS A., P ÉREZ -M ATEOS M., M ONTERO P., G ÓMEZ -G UILLÉN M.D.C.
(2008): A comparative study of the effects of high pressure on proteolytic degradation of sardine and blue whiting muscle. Fisheries Science, 74 :
899-910.
H ULTMANN L., R USTAD T.
(2004): Iced storage of Atlantic salmon ( Salmo salar ) –
Effects on endogenous enzymes and their impact on muscle proteins and texture. Food Chemistry, 87 : 31-41.
J IANG S.T.
(2000): Effect of proteinases on the meat texture and seafood quality.
Food Science and Agricultural Chemistry, 2 : 55-74.
J IANG S.T., L EE J.J., C HEN H.C.
(1994): Purification and characterization of cathepsin-B from ordinary muscle of mackerel ( Scomber Australasicus ).
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 42 : 1073-1079.
J UNG S., G HOUL M., L AMBALLERIE -A NTON M.
(2000): Changes in lysosomal enzyme activities and shear values of high pressure treated meat during ageing. Meat Science, 56 : 239-246.
L AKSHMANAN R., P ATTERSON M., P IGGOTT J.
(2005): Effects of high-pressure processing on proteolytic enzymes and proteins in cold-smoked salmon during refrigerated storage. Food Chemistry, 90 : 541-548.
9
301
310
311
312
313
314
315
306
307
308
309
302
303
304
305
320
321
322
323
324
316
317
318
319
L UND K.E., N IELSEN H.H.
(2001): Proteolysis in salmon ( Salmo salar ) during cold storage; Effects of storage time and smoking process. Journal of Food
Biochemistry, 25 : 379-395.
M ATSUMIYA M., M OCHIZUKI A., O TAKE S.
(1989): Purification and characterization of cathepsin B from ordinary muscle of common mackerel, Scomber japonicus . Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi, 55 : 2185 - 2190.
M BARKI R., S ADOK S., B ARKALLAH I.
(2009): Quality changes of the Mediterranean horse mackerel ( Trachurus mediterraneus ) during chilled storage: The effect of low-dose gamma irradiation. Radiation Physics and Chemistry,
78 : 288-292.
N IELSEN M.K., N IELSEN H.H.
(2006): Seafood enzymes. In: Hui Y.H. (1st ed.):
Food Biochemistry and Food Processing. Blackwell Publishing, USA.
O HMORI T., S HIGEHISA T., T AJI S., H AYASHI R.
(1992): Biochemical effects of high hydrostatic pressure on the lysosome and proteases involved in it.
Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry, 56 : 1285-1288.
R AMIREZ R., S ARAIVA J., P ÉREZ L AMELA C., T ORRES J.A.
(2009): Reaction kinetics analysis of chemical changes in pressure-assisted thermal processing.
Food Engineering Reviews, 1 : 16-30.
S IMEONIDOU S., G OVARIS A., V ARELTZIS K.
(1997): Effect of frozen storage on the quality of whole fish and fillets of horse mackerel ( Trachurus trachurus ) and mediterranean hake ( Merluccius mediterraneus ). Zeitschrift für
Lebensmitteluntersuchung und -Forschung A, 204 : 405-410.
W IMALARATNE S.K., F ARID M.M.
(2008): Pressure assisted thermal sterilization.
Food and Bioproducts Processing, 86 : 312-316.
10
325
326
327
328
329
Tables
Table 1 – Cathepsin B and D activities in untreated mackerel and horse mackerel
Fish species
Mackerel
Horse mackerel
Cathepsin B activity
(FU.min
-1 .g
-1 )
218839 ± 13147
13303 ± 361
Cathepsin D activity
(µg tyrosine.min
-1 .g
-1 )
2.044 ± 0.138
3.31 ± 0.263
11
330
331
Figures
A
250000
200000
0 min 2.5 min 5 min B
250000
Non processed
200000
0.1 MPa
300 MPa
Non processed
150 MPa
450 MPa
150000 150000
100000 100000
332
333
334
335
50000
0 150 300
Pressure (MPa)
450
50000
0
Pressure holding time (min)
5
Statistical analysis #
0 min
2.5 min
5 min
150 MPa b x * a x ab x *
300 MPa b y * a x * a x
450 MPa a y * a y * a y *
(#) Different letters denote significant differences (p < 0.05) between pressure levels (x-y) or between pressure holding times (a-b), and the symbol * denotes significant differences compared with non-processed samples (0.1 MPa).
Fig. 1 – Pressure level and holding time effects on cathepsin B activity in mackerel
12
A
20000
0 min 2.5 min 5 min
B
20000
0.1 MPa
300 MPa
150 MPa
450 MPa
15000 15000
10000 10000
Non processed
Non processed
5000 5000
337
338
339
340
336
0
0 150 300
Pressure (MPa)
450
0
0
Pressure holding time (min)
5
Statistical analysis # 150 MPa 300 MPa 450 MPa
0 min
2.5 min
5 min a x * a x * b y * a x * b y b x a y * b z * b z *
(#) Different letters denote significant differences (p < 0.05) between pressure levels (x-z) or between pressure holding times (a-b), and the symbol * denotes significant differences compared with non-processed samples (0.1 MPa).
Fig. 2 – Pressure level and holding time effects on cathepsin B activity in horse mackerel
13
A 0 min 2.5 min 5 min B
0.1 MPa
300 MPa
150 MPa
450 MPa
5
4
5
4
3 3
341
342
343
344
2 2
Non processed Non processed
1
0 150 300
Pressure (MPa)
450
1
0
Pressure holding time (min)
5
Statistical analysis # 150 MPa 300 MPa 450 MPa
0 min
2.5 min
5 min a z * b z a y * c y * b x * a x * a x * b y * c z
(#) Different letters denote significant differences (p < 0.05) between pressure levels (x-z) or between pressure holding times (a-b), and the symbol * denotes significant differences compared with non-processed samples (0.1 MPa).
Fig. 3 – Pressure level and holding time effects on cathepsin D activity in mackerel
14
A 0 min 2.5 min 5 min B
0.1 MPa
300 MPa
150 MPa
450 MPa
7
6
5
4
5
4
7
6
345
346
347
348
3 3
Non processed Non processed
2
0 150 300
Pressure (MPa)
450
2
0
Pressure holding time (min)
5
Statistical analysis: 150 MPa 300 MPa 450 MPa
0 min
2.5 min
5 min a x * ab y * b y b xy a x * a x *
B y
B y a x *
(#): Different letters denote significant differences (p < 0.05) between pressure levels (x-y) or between pressure holding times (ab), and the symbol * denotes significant differences compared with non-processed samples (0.1 MPa).
Fig. 4
– Pressure level and holding time effects on cathepsin D activity in horse mackerel
15
