UCC/UGC/ECCC Proposal for New Course Please attach proposed Syllabus in approved university format. 1. Course subject and number: BME 520 2. Units: See upper and lower division undergraduate course definitions. 3. College: Education 4. Academic Unit: 3 Educational Specialties 5. Student Learning Outcomes of the new course. (Resources & Examples for Developing Course Learning Outcomes) Upon completion of this course, students will be able to: 1. Identify linguistic structures that distinguish written and spoken language forms as well as those representing social and academic uses of language. 2. Design instructional activities that help ELLs develop strategies to monitor their use of English genres, rhetorical patterns, discourse structures and writing conventions. 3. Understand the communicative, social and constructive nature of language and able to use linguistic scaffolding to support ELLs comprehension and production of academic and social language in the classroom. 4. Develop the essentials in the four cue systems (graphophonic, syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic) in the child’s first language. Use knowledge of these interrelated aspects of language as they support ELLs acquisition of English. 5. Prepare teachers to observe, plan and organize teachings around children’s strengths and needs 6. Explore assessment practices and techniques to monitor and document children’s trajectories toward literacy. 7. Create units for bi-literacy instruction that align with state content (e.g. Common Core) and language development standards, new and home language arts progressions. 6. Justification for new course, including how the course contributes to degree program outcomes, or other university requirements / student learning outcomes. (Resources, Examples & Tools for Developing Effective Program Student Learning Outcomes). BME 420, Literacy and Bi-literacy Development, is part of the ESL endorsement. While we also offer graduate-level courses needed for the ESL endorsement, the graduate version of BME 420 had never been developed until now. This is the only course in the graduate ESL endorsement that is needed to have all graduate-level courses. 7. Effective BEGINNING of what term and year? See effective dates calendar. Fall 2015 8. Long course title: LITERACY AND BI-LITERACY DEVELOPMENT (max 100 characters including spaces) 9. Short course title: Effective Fall 2013 LITERACY & BI-LITERACY DEV (max. 30 characters including spaces) 10. Catalog course description (max. 60 words, excluding requisites): This course will focus on the theories and practices related to using two languages in the classroom. Emphasis will be placed on appropriate curricula and materials development that enhance literacy and bi-literacy process approaches, serving linguistically and culturally diverse students. 11. Will this course be part of any plan (major, minor or certificate) or sub plan (emphasis)? Yes No If yes, include the appropriate plan proposal. ESL GCRT, ESL Endorsement-ADE, Bilingual Endorsement-ADE (elective), BME MEd-ESL (elective), BME MEd-Bilingual ESL (elective) 12. Does this course duplicate content of existing courses? Yes No If yes, list the courses with duplicate material. If the duplication is greater than 20%, explain why NAU should establish this course. This course will be co-convened with BME 420 13. Will this course impact any other academic unit’s enrollment or plan(s)? Yes No If yes, describe the impact. If applicable, include evidence of notification to and/or response from each impacted academic unit BME 420/520 is sometimes used as an elective for the following programs: Ethnic Studies (Ethnic Studies Minor) Teaching and Learning (Applied Science-Early Childhood), Business and Administration-Extended Campus (Applied Science-Technology Management). See attached notifications to Ethnic Studies and Extended Campuses. 14. Grading option: Letter grade Pass/Fail Both 15. Co-convened with: BME 420 14a. UGC approval date*: (For example: ESE 450 and ESE 550) See co-convening policy. *Must be approved by UGC before UCC submission, and both course syllabi must be presented. 16. Cross-listed with: (For example: ES 450 and DIS 450) See cross listing policy. Please submit a single cross-listed syllabus that will be used for all cross-listed courses. 17. May course be repeated for additional units? 16a. If yes, maximum units allowed? 16b. If yes, may course be repeated for additional units in the same term? 18. Prerequisites: NONE If prerequisites, include the rationale for the prerequisites. 19. Co requisites: NONE If co requisites, include the rationale for the co requisites. Effective Fall 2013 Yes No Yes No 20. Does this course include combined lecture and lab components? Yes No If yes, include the units specific to each component in the course description above. Christine Lemley, Ph.D., Jennie DeGroat, Jon Reyhner, Ph.D., 21. Names of the current faculty qualified to teach this course: Louise Lockard, Ph.D. 22. Classes scheduled before the regular term begins and/or after the regular term ends may require additional action. Review “see description” and “see impacts” for “Classes Starting/Ending Outside Regular Term” under the heading “Forms” http://nau.edu/Registrar/Faculty-Resources/Schedule-of-Classes-Maintenance/. Do you anticipate this course will be scheduled outside the regular term? Yes No Answer 22-23 for UCC/ECCC only: 23. Is this course being proposed for Liberal Studies designation? If yes, include a Liberal Studies proposal and syllabus with this proposal. 24. Is this course being proposed for Diversity designation? If yes, include a Diversity proposal and syllabus with this proposal. Yes No Yes No FLAGSTAFF MOUNTAIN CAMPUS Scott Galland Reviewed by Curriculum Process Associate 11/10/2014 Date Approvals: Department Chair/Unit Head (if appropriate) Date Chair of college curriculum committee Date Dean of college Date For Committee use only: UCC/UGC Approval Date Approved as submitted: Yes No Approved as modified: Yes No Effective Fall 2013 EXTENDED CAMPUSES Reviewed by Curriculum Process Associate Date Approvals: Academic Unit Head Date Division Curriculum Committee (Yuma, Yavapai, or Personalized Learning) Date Division Administrator in Extended Campuses (Yuma, Yavapai, or Personalized Learning) Date Faculty Chair of Extended Campuses Curriculum Committee (Yuma, Yavapai, or Personalized Learning) Date Chief Academic Officer; Extended Campuses (or Designee) Date Approved as submitted: Yes No Approved as modified: Yes No From: Stuart S Galland Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2014 9:57 AM To: Patrick A Deegan Cc: Lisa Marie Wischmeier Subject: New BME 520 Hi Patrick, This message is to notify you that the department of Educational Specialties is proposing a new graduate-level course to co convene with BME 420 ; BME 520. BME 420 is currently an option in the Early Childhood; B.A.S. and the Technology Management; B.A.S. (No action is necessary, this is just a notification) Thank you! Scott Galland Curriculum Process Associate Office of Curriculum, Learning Design, and Academic Assessment 928-523-1753 928-699-9147 (cell) scott.galland@nau.edu From: Stuart S Galland Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2014 10:10 AM To: Angelina Elizabeth Castagno Subject: New BME 520 Effective Fall 2013 Hi Angelina, This message is to notify you that the department of Educational Specialties is proposing a new graduate-level course to co convene with BME 420 ; BME 520. BME 420 is currently an option in the Ethnic Studies Minor. (No action is necessary, this is just a notification) Thank you! Scott Galland Curriculum Process Associate Office of Curriculum, Learning Design, and Academic Assessment 928-523-1753 928-699-9147 (cell) scott.galland@nau.edu Effective Fall 2013 College of Education Vision Statement We develop educational leaders who create tomorrow's opportunities. Mission Statement Our mission is to prepare professionals to serve and lead education and human services organizations. BME 520 - Literacy and Bi-literacy Development Syllabus Semester 3 Hour Credits Instructor's name: Office Address: Office Phone: Email: Office hours: Course Description: This course will focus on the theories and practices related to using two languages in the classroom. Emphasis will be placed on appropriate curricula and materials development that enhance literacy and bi-literacy process approaches, serving linguistically and culturally diverse students. Coconvenes with BME 420. Student Learning Expectations/Outcomes for this Course Upon completion of this course, students will be able to (TESOL Standards for P-12 Teacher Preparation Programs): Upon completion of this course, students will be able to: 1. Identify linguistic structures that distinguish written and spoken language forms as well as those representing social and academic uses of language. 2. Design instructional activities that help ELLs develop strategies to monitor their use of English genres, rhetorical patterns, discourse structures and writing conventions. 3. Understand the communicative, social and constructive nature of language and able to use linguistic scaffolding to support ELLs comprehension and production of academic and social language in the classroom. 4. Develop the essentials in the four cue systems (graphophonic, syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic) in the child’s first language. Use knowledge of these interrelated aspects of language as they support ELLs acquisition of English. 5. Prepare teachers to observe, plan and organize teachings around children’s strengths and needs 6. Explore assessment practices and techniques to monitor and document children’s trajectories toward literacy. Effective Fall 2013 7. Create units for bi-literacy instruction that align with state content (e.g. Common Core) and language development standards, new and home language arts progressions. TESOL Domain 1. Language 2. Culture 3. Planning, Implementing and Managing Instruction 4. Assessment 5. Professionalism Standards specifically met by BME 520 1.a. Understand the elements of phonology, morphology and syntax and describe aspects of English that are difficult for their students. N/A Provide standards-based reading and writing instruction adapted to ESOL Learners. Develop students’ writing through a range of activities, from sentence formation to expository writing. 4.c. Prepare ELLs to use self and peer assessment. N/A Course Structure/approach: This is a course in which students will read and reflect on assigned readings, complete assignments, participate in online discussions, complete class projects, and take a midterm and final exam. Required Text: Richard-Amato, Patricia A. (2010). Making It Happen: From Interactive to Participatory Language Teaching, 4th Edition. Escamilla, Kathy (2013) Biliteracy from the Start Literacy Squared in Action. Philadelphia, PA: Caslon Publishing. Articles: Bengochea, A. (2013). Becoming biliterate: identity, ideology, and learning to read and write in two languages. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 16(1), 121-125. Bialystok, E. (2013). 25 The Impact of Bilingualism on Language and Literacy Development. The Handbook of Bilingualism and Multilingualism, 624. Díaz, M. E., & Bussert-Webb, K. (2013). Reading and language beliefs and practices of Latino/a children in a border colonia. Journal of Latinos and Education, 12(1), 59-73. Dworin, J. (2011). Listening to Graduates of a K-12 Bilingual Program: Language Ideologies and Literacy Practices of Former Bilingual Students. GIST Education and Learning Research Journal, (5), 104-126. Hopewell, S., & Escamilla, K. (2014). Struggling Reader or Emerging Biliterate Student? Reevaluating the Criteria for Labeling Emerging Bilingual Students as Low Achieving. Journal of Literacy Research, 46(1), 68-89. Hopewell, S., & Escamilla, K. (2014). Biliteracy development in immersion contexts. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 2(2), 181-195. Hornberger, N. H., & Link, H. (2012). Translanguaging and transnational literacies in multilingual classrooms: A biliteracy lens. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 15(3), 261-278. Effective Fall 2013 Mccarty, T. L. (2013). Literacy and Language Revitalization. The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Medina, C. (2010). “Reading across communities” in biliteracy practices: Examining translocal discourses and cultural flows in literature discussions. Reading Research Quarterly, 45(1), 4060. Reyes, I. (2012). Biliteracy among children and youths. Reading Research Quarterly, 47(3), 307-327. Rodríguez-Valls, F. (2011). Coexisting Languages: Reading Bilingual Books with Biliterate Eyes. Bilingual Research Journal, 34(1), 19-37. Rolstad, K. (2014). Interconnecting worlds: teacher partnerships for bilingual learning. Educational Research, 56(3), 360-365. Smith, P. H., & Murillo, L. A. (2013). Repositioning biliteracy as capital for learning: lessons from teacher preparation at the US–Mexico border. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(3), 301-323. Course Requirements: Methods of Assessment 1. Chapter Readings: Read the chapter assigned in the textbook Making It Happen (MIH), respond to the reading addressing the following: 1. List and define one key term used in each chapter assigned (4 terms total). 2. From each chapter, describe one of the Chapter's main idea/s, citing the page number. Then, state how this could be applied to the students in your classroom or intended classroom; and to your own teaching for each point. 3. What final reflections, comments or questions do you have after reading the chapters? 20 pts each x 5 = 100 pts total 2. Discussions Respond to the main topics in the discussion board. Each module response is worth (7-pts) if the response addressed all aspects of the question(s) in depth and made connections to the readings or to life experiences and (3 pts) for responding constructively to a classmate’s posting (10-pts per discussion). No text messaging allowed. 10 pts each x 9 = 90 pts total 3. Research Paper Select a topic of your interest designated for graduate students in the Reading Reserves Folder. Use the resources listed or other outside sources. Research and address the topic in regards to bi-literacy instruction in promoting language/literacy development for culturally and linguistically diverse learners. Your paper should: Use peer-reviewed journals as sources (no magazines, newspapers, websites unless they belong to a reputable source such a university and they are written by faculty and not by students) Use APA style throughout the paper (i.e., format, writing, citations, references, etc.) Be 12 pages in length (with coversheet and reference page), double-spaced with a 12 pt standard font, coversheet and reference page. Reference 8 sources throughout the paper to support your discussion. Suggested topics; APA format and online resources are all available at the homepage. 50 pts total Effective Fall 2013 4. Literature Based Thematic Unit Select a text set of 4-10 bi-literate literature and nonfiction books (this is a book written in two languages) and discuss the texts in terms of the six purposes addressed on pages 306-307 (MIH). In addition, develop a one-week thematic unit for these texts that aligns with Common Core standards. You can search the internet on examples of Bi-literacy Books or visit your local library, bookstore, etc. Present three lessons from the thematic unit to a group of classmates in BME 420. Your classmates will use a rubric to evaluate your teaching and materials. Submit to the professor the lessons and your undergraduate classmates’ evaluations. Also, you will provide feedback to at least one of your undergraduate classmates on the pre- and post-reading activities around the bi-literacy book that he/she selects. 40 pts total 5. Power Point Presentation I For this assignment you will create a Power Point presentation for all to review and critique. Select an author to profile and provide 2 lessons that promote bi-literacy development from studying the author. The two lessons should integrate listening, speaking, reading and writing using Interactive Practice outlined in the textbook and must show evidence of bi-literacy instruction. There will be several examples available at the homepage for your review. Be creative with this assignment. You will post this on the discussion board for all to review upon its completion. 50 pts total 1. Power Point Presentation II For this assignment you will team with an undergraduate student to create a Power Point presentation based on an assigned chapter from the textbook Biliteracy from the Start Literacy Squared in Action. You have the option to put the presentation for everybody to review and critique using a rubric OR you can select three classmates that will do that. Submit the presentation and the critiques to your professor. 50 pts. total. 7. Exams: There will be a Midterm Exam and a Final Exam. For each exam students will select three questions from a list and respond to the question in essay format. 50-pts each; 100 pts total Grade Distribution and Assignment Due Dates Assignment Respond to Reading Discussions Midterm Exam Research Paper Text-Based Unit Power Point I Power Point II Final Exam Grading System 480 – 432 = A 431– 384 = B 383 – 336 = C 335 or less = F Course Policy Effective Fall 2013 Due Points 100 90 50 50 40 50 50 50 Acceptable late submissions will be at the discretion of the instructor for unforeseen and/or extreme circumstances; otherwise, no late submission. Make sure to check the course syllabus to inform you of all due dates and expectations. The grading system above is used to give final grade. Ask for clarification ahead of time and not the day the assignments are due. Students are responsible for all readings and expected to handle web courses. This course requires students to communicate with the instructor for any clarifications or questions regarding the course content. Do not send out mass emails to students as they are not able to help with course content issues. Students will be administratively dropped after one week if there is no activity posted by any student (see NAU policy emailed out). If you get behind in coursework, contact the instructor early enough and NOT the last week of the semester. Northern Arizona University Policy Statements for course syllabi Safe Environment Policy NAU’s Safe Working and Learning Environment Policy prohibits sexual harassment and assault, and discrimination and harassment on the basis of sex, race, color, age, national origin, religion, sexual orientation, gender identity, disability, or veteran status by anyone at this university. Retaliation of any kind as a result of making a complaint under the policy or participating in an investigation is also prohibited. The Director of the Office of Affirmative Action & Equal Opportunity (AA/EO) serves as the university’s compliance officer for affirmative action, civil rights, and Title IX, and is the ADA/504 Coordinator. AA/EO also assists with religious accommodations. You may obtain a copy of this policy from the college dean’s office or from the NAU’s Affirmative Action website nau.edu/diversity/. If you have questions or concerns about this policy, it is important that you contact the departmental chair, dean’s office, the Office of Student Life (928-523-5181), or NAU’s Office of Affirmative Action (928) 523-3312 (voice), (928) 523-9977 (fax), (928) 523-1006 (TTD) or aaeo@nau.edu. Students with Disabilities If you have a documented disability, you can arrange for accommodations by contacting Disability Resources (DR) at 523-8773 (voice) or 523-6906 (TTY), dr@nau.edu (e-mail) or 928-523-8747 (fax). Students needing academic accommodations are required to register with DR and provide required disability related documentation. Although you may request an accommodation at any time, in order for DR to best meet your individual needs, you are urged to register and submit necessary documentation (www.nau.edu/dr) 8 weeks prior to the time you wish to receive accommodations. DR is strongly committed to the needs of student with disabilities and the promotion of Universal Design. Concerns or questions related to the accessibility of programs and facilities at NAU may be brought to the attention of DR or the Office of Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity (523-3312). Academic Contact Hour Policy Based on the Arizona Board of Regents Academic Contact Hour Policy (ABOR Handbook, 2-224), for every unit of credit, a student should expect, on average, to do a minimum of three hours of work per week, including but not limited to class time, preparation, homework, studying. Effective Fall 2013 Academic Integrity Integrity is expected of every member of the NAU community in all academic undertakings. Integrity entails a firm adherence to a set of values, and the values most essential to an academic community are grounded in honesty with respect to all intellectual efforts of oneself and others. Academic integrity is expected not only in formal coursework situations, but in all University relationships and interactions connected to the educational process, including the use of University resources. An NAU student’s submission of work is an implicit declaration that the work is the student’s own. All outside assistance should be acknowledged, and the student’s academic contribution truthfully reported at all times. In addition, NAU students have a right to expect academic integrity from each of their peers. Individual students and faculty members are responsible for identifying potential violations of the university’s academic integrity policy. Instances of potential violations are adjudicated using the process found in the university Academic Integrity Policy. RESEARCH INTEGRITY The Responsible Conduct of Research policy is intended to ensure that NAU personnel including NAU students engaged in research are adequately trained in the basic principles of ethics in research. Additionally, this policy assists NAU in meeting the RCR training and compliance requirements of the National Science Foundation (NSF)-The America COMPETES Act (Creating Opportunities to Meaningfully Promote Excellence in Technology, Education and Science); 42 U.S.C 18620-1, Section 7009, and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) policy on the instruction of the RCR (NOT-OD-10-019; “Update on the Requirement for Instruction in the Responsible Conduct of Research”). For more information on the policy and the training activities required for personnel and students conducting research, at NAU, visit: http://nau.edu/Research/Compliance/Research-Integrity/ SENSITIVE COURSE MATERIALS University education aims to expand student understanding and awareness. Thus, it necessarily involves engagement with a wide range of information, ideas, and creative representations. In the course of college studies, students can expect to encounter—and critically appraise—materials that may differ from and perhaps challenge familiar understandings, ideas, and beliefs. Students are encouraged to discuss these matters with faculty. CLASSROOM DISRUPTION POLICY Membership in the academic community places a special obligation on all participants to preserve an atmosphere conducive to a safe and positive learning environment. Part of that obligation implies the responsibility of each member of the NAU community to maintain an environment in which the behavior of any individual is not disruptive. Instructors have the authority and the responsibility to manage their classes in accordance with University regulations. Instructors have the right and obligation to confront disruptive behavior thereby promoting and enforcing standards of behavior necessary for maintaining an atmosphere conducive to teaching and learning. Instructors are responsible for establishing, communicating, and enforcing reasonable expectations and rules of classroom behavior. These expectations are to be communicated to students in the syllabus and in class discussions and activities at the outset of the course. Each student is responsible for behaving in a manner that supports a positive learning environment and that does not interrupt nor disrupt the delivery of education by instructors or receipt of education by students, within or outside a class. The complete classroom disruption policy is in Appendices of NAU’s Student Handbook. Effective Fall 2013 Effective Fall 2013