Summer 2013: TTE 596 1 Understanding by Design Final Project by Lawrence Schneider Stage 1 – Desired Results Established Goals What content standards and program goals will the unit address? Program Goals Content Standards (HS.G-MG.3) Apply geometric methods to solve design problems (e.g. designing an object or structure to satisfy physical constraints or minimizing cost; working with typographic grid systems based on ratios) (HS.N-Q.2) Define appropriate quantities for the purposes of descriptive modeling. (HS.N-Q.3) Choose a level of accuracy appropriate to limitations on measurement when reporting quantities. (HS.G-MG.1) Use geometric shapes, their measures, and their properties to describe objects (e.g., modeling a tree trunk or a human torso as a cylinder). (HS.MP.1) Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them. (HS.G-SRT.2) Given two figures, use the definition of similarity in terms of similarity transformations to decide if they are similar; explain using similarity transformations the meaning of similarity for triangles as the equality of all corresponding pairs of angles and the proportionality of all corresponding pairs of sides. (HS.G-GMD.1) Give an informal argument for the formulas for the circumference of a circle, area of a circle, volume of a cylinder, pyramid, and cone. Use dissection arguments, Cavalieri’s principle, and informal limit arguments. (HS.G-GMD.3) Use volume formulas for cylinders, pyramids, cones, and spheres to solve problems. Transfer - Measuring items in theory (by definition) to actual objects (physics) Identifying measured values Communication between a designer of an object and the producer of the object. Understandings Meaning Essential Questions The unit of measurement chosen to measure an object has a direct role in how accurate your measurements will be. The use of properties/definitions/characteristics of geometric shapes on actual objects can influence how one measures said objects. Because we use properties of geometric shapes to measure actual objects, how we measure the objects may be generalized in some way. Students will know … If polygons can be constructed using triangles, what polyhedra can be constructed by another polyhedron? What are the pros and cons to using metric units of measurement over standard units of measurement and vice-versa? What does one have to consider when using a described model or drawing to construct a physical object? What does one have to consider when using geometric shapes and their properties when constructing physical objects? Acquisition Students will be skilled at Pre-Skills Pre-Knowledge That negative exponents in scientific notation affects the order of magnitude in a value’s representation That there is a specific relationship between vertices, edges, and faces of polyhedron, Euler’s Formula. The different formulas (and how they are related) for polyhedron (i.e., how the surface area of pyramid is related to the surface area of a cone). Post-Knowledge That any prism can be deconstructed into pyramids with no gaps between them at all. That to construct a physical model of a described object requires consideration of the relationships between defined geometric properties and practical realities (i.e. error in measurement, approximation of irrational numbers). Provide a mathematically rigorous description of a physical model Use measuring devices in metric and standard forms Convert fractions to decimals for measuring purposes Post-Skills Generalize the properties of geometric shapes in order to analyze given objects Identify the proportion between a physical object and its scaled drawing/model Convert between general measurements and specific measurements Convert between different magnitudes of measurement in terms of decimal values (i.e. 100 thousandths versus 1/10th) Recognize constraints in their measuring tools and the constraints’ implications on accuracy Summer 2013: TTE 596 2 Understanding by Design Final Project by Lawrence Schneider Stage 2 - Assessments Performance Task (in GRASPS format) Goal: - You have been asked by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers to develop a set of equations that will work given any CNC machine that uses Cartesian Coordinate inputs. - Your job is to help both the engineering community and the manufacturing community to recognize the relationships that exist between the theoretical and practical aspects of mathematics. - Your task is to algebraically generalize lengths of each edge of the three rectangular pyramids that fit together to form a rectangular prism. - The goal is to be able to construct the three rectangular pyramids that form any rectangular prism. - The challenge you will face will be to take a specific rectangular prism, identify the three rectangular pyramids that form the prism and generalize the lengths of each edge in relation to the given prism so that no matter what values exist for a rectangular prism, you can identify the twelve (12) edge lengths. - You will have to identify the obstacles you will face inaccurately measuring the lengths of a rectangular prism, and then taking those measurements and physically construct the three triangular prisms. You will have to consider the relationship between definitions and reality in respect to geometric concepts. Role: - You are an apprentice engineer. As such, you are developing a relationship with the machinists who will be using the generalizations you develop to program their CNC machines. In essence, not only are you an apprentice engineer, you are also an apprentice machinist. You will be gaining a perspective that provides a point of view from the engineering world (design) and the manufacturing world (production). Audience: - Your client is the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, ASME. Each year the ASME makes refinements to the numerous set of Standards that they have been developing since 1945. - The target audience are two board member of ASME who are looking for the clearest set of generalizations that will make sense to an engineer and a machinist. - You will need to convince the board members that your set of equations are true given any circumstance, and that the set of equations will make sense to both an engineer and to a machinist. Situation: - The context you find yourself in is this. Engineers use math on a daily basis, and so do machinists. The difference is that engineers use theoretical/pure mathematics while machinists use practical/applied mathematics. Miscommunications arise because theoretical mathematics and equations do not LOOK like the types of inputs a machinist will input into a CNC machine. There needs to be a way to bridge the communication gap between engineers and machinists. - The challenge involves taking an abstract math concept and developing a “Rosetta Stone” for the machinist, a set of equations that a machinist can view as a template for the machines that they use on a daily basis. Product, Performance and Purpose: - You will create a matrix that determines which equation to use given a specific scenario in order that the engineer knows what equation to give a machinist when the machinist is required to create a desired piece, and that the machinist knows what equation to ask the engineer for when they are creating a desired piece. - You need to develop this matrix so that the level of communication between the engineering community and the machinist community is strong and transparent. This matrix may not solve every problem that exists, but will provide a path towards consistent communication. Standards and Criteria for Success: - Your performance needs to be professional in nature. You will develop a Power Point presentation, and a written report. The matrices and systems of equations you are developwill be presented to two ASME board members. You will demonstrate how your systems of equations work, given the dimensions of any rectangular prism. - Your work will be judged by the board members of ASME. Because it may actually become a part of the standards the ASME produces and refines, your work will be clear, concise, and accessible (meaning that both engineers and machinists will be able to understand it). - Your product must meet the following requirements: General equations for lines in relation to one another in such a way that when folded construct pyramids. The equations will be algebraically sound, having been peer reviewed by your classmates and reviewed by the board members of ASME. The equations will be general in nature, applicable to a variety of scenarios and only needing a minimum amount of information to be used. Summer 2013: TTE 596 3 Understanding by Design Final Project by Lawrence Schneider Your product will give clear and thoughtful suggestions to the members of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. These suggestions will be centered on your work and the generalized equations you produce. Other Evidence: (quizzes, tests, prompts, work samples, labs, etc.) Work Samples 2-dimensional constructions of the nets of 3-dimensional objects, showing measurements in specific form and generalized A system of equations in standard form that represent the edge lengths of the 2-dimensional constructions laid on a Cartesian Coordinate Plane Labs Constructing a system of equations to map a given net on a Cartesian Coordinate System. Taking a 2-dimensional figure, generalizing the characteristics of that figure based on a datum (reference characteristic). Quizzes The quizzes will be physical constructions or systems of equations that model the Work Samples and Labs Student Self-Assessment and Reflection Reflections As part of the group project, the students will do a behind-the-scenes video of their project. They will detail the areas they struggled in, the areas they were successful in, and show the class the process of their constructions.\ The students will participate in weekly online reflections where they can share their frustrations. They will be prompted to reflect on specific aspects of their understanding. Self-Assessment The students will participate in Likert Scale surveys to measure their understanding of the differences between a novice engineers and expert engineers. Stage 3 – Learning Plan 1. Entry Question - There is no such thing as a straight line. There is no such thing as a circle. There is no such thing as flat surface. Are these statements true? (H) 2. Essential Questions and discussion of the culminating unit performance tasks- Why are there differences between theory and definition and practical uses of mathematics? Why do these differences exist? What are some of those differences? ( H, R) 3. Presentation of Concept–The students will be given the scenario of being an engineer who is developing generalized systems of equations that a machinist can use to construct pyramids that are part of the whole of a rectangular prism. (W) 4. Group and Role Assignment – The students are put into groups of 4. (O, T, E) a. Person responsible for the keeping of records, documentation, b. Person responsible for organizing the work materials c. Person responsible for the communication between the team and their Supervisor (Mr. Schneider) d. Person responsible for the final presentation. 5. I will give a timeline for the project, share with them the concepts that will be covered and necessary for them to master in order to be successful in constructing their models and developing their systems of equations. The students will understand that this unit will take a few weeks to complete, that it is not just a day or two day, or even one week project. (W, O, Eq) 6. The students will be given a pre-assessment to gage their current level of understanding. 7. The first lesson will focus on systems of equations and piecewise functions that represent an unfolded pyramid. (Eq.) 8. The students will reflect on previous knowledge and identify connections to what they have learned in the past (E) 9. The second lesson will focus on properties of triangles, including the Pythagorean Theorem and its proof. (Eq) This lesson will also begin to describe the relationship between measurements as definitions and as actual constructions 10. The students will draw right triangles that are Pythagorean Triples and that also have irrational hypotenuses. (R, E) 11. The students will write a reflection on what they learned concerning the relationship between measurements and actual constructions (R). Pre-Assessments The attached Pre-Assessment will be used at the beginning of this lesson unit. The same assessment will be given after as a Post-Assessment to measure growth. Progress Monitoring will take place in two ways: Through me and summative and formative assessments, and through the students through journaling and Likert-type surveys online (see attached). As the students gage their own learning, progress will be monitored. I will also be posting class grades and trends so that students have a prompt to reflect on. • What are potential rough spots and student misunderstandings? In mathematics, if you miss one day, much of the concepts may be difficult to catch up on. This is my biggest concern. • How will students get the feedback they need The feedback should be pretty instantaneous in regards to the Likert-scale surveys my students will be taking weekly. The students will see right away their own progress in terms of their behaviors and perceptions. In terms of actual work, the students will have a rubric in which to grade themselves and their group members. Summer 2013: TTE 596 4 Understanding by Design Final Project by Lawrence Schneider 12. The third lesson will introduce the students to prisms. The properties of polyhedron will be introduced. Students will discuss the relationship between geometric properties and definitions and objects that actually exist. (R, H) 13. The fourth lesson will introduce students to the fact that prisms can be constructed using pyramids, specifically that rectangular prisms can be constructed using three pyramids. The students will learn how to draw the two calculate the explicit lengths of edges of the three pyramids given the length, width, and height of the prism (Eq). 14. The fifth lesson will focus on generalizing the edge lengths given variable edge lengths for a rectangular prism (Eq). 15. The sixth lesson will have the students take the three-dimensional objects and construct two-dimensional nets. This will be the first lesson where students can physically see the relationship between definitions of measurement and physical constructions. The students will discuss and reflect on what they see as best practices for measurement and construction. Is the metric system better than the standard system? (H, Eq, R, E) 16. The seventh lesson will have the students construct rectangular prisms that have specific dimensions using three pyramids. The students will discuss and reflect on the best practices to construct the pyramids and prisms. The students will discuss and reflect on the considerations they have to make in constructing the pyramids and prisms. (Eq) 17. The seventh lesson will have the students transfer their ability to draw the twodimensional nets to the Cartesian Coordinate Plane. The students will take these drawings and identify the system of piecewise equations that would result in the figures. (Eq) 18. The eighth lesson will have students develop a system of piecewise functions that would satisfy the required conditions for a pyramid with specific dimensions. (Eq) 19. The ninth lesson will have students develop three systems of piecewise functions that would satisfy the required conditions for a prism, constructed using three pyramids. (Eq) 20. The students will being developing their presentations. They will be required to identify the techniques necessary to produce three pyramids that construct a prism. They will be required to identify the techniques they used to accurately construct said pyramids. They will be required to identify the techniques used to identify the three systems of piecewise functions that would draw on a two-dimensional plane the net of three pyramids that construct a prism. They will also construct a prism using three pyramids and present how they did it, what problems they faced, considerations that were knew to them, etc. (R, E, T) Self Check: - Are all three types of goals (acquisition, meaning, and transfer) addressed in the learning plan? - Does the learning plan reflect principles of learning and best practices? - Is there tight alignment with Stages 1 and 2? - Is the plan likely to be engaging and effective for all students? Summer 2013: TTE 596 5 Understanding by Design Final Project by Lawrence Schneider Appendices Relationship to Internship Experience Measurement is a practical application of geometric properties and concepts. Measurement takes place every day. In the grocery store, prices of bulk items are often based on weight. The amount of money one pays for a tank of gas depends on the volume of gas purchased. The ratio between time and energy used by a home determines the monthly utility bill. These ubiquitous experiences are dependent on the accuracy of said measurements, yet the general public usually takes these measurements for granted. When was the last time anyone checked the scales at the grocery store, or checked to see if the gallons of gas they are purchasing are actually gallons? The goal of this UbD lesson is to have students recognized the nuances of measurement. Geometric properties define many of the lengths people deal with on a daily basis. In the design of a modular system, it is often the case that one shape contains smaller shapes (i.e. solar panels on a satellite, or the folds in an airbag). At Raytheon, modular systems are the norm and the words accuracy and precision are part of everyday conversation. In the metrology department, measurement is the sole focus. Metrology means the study of measurement. Every day, metrology engineers and technicians check the accuracy of measurement devices and measurement practices. The students will face many of the issues that metrology engineers face. In particular, they will have to recognize the relationship between standards and definitions of measurement that are derived through geometric properties and measurements of physical objects. Geometry is a set of abstract ideas, definitions, properties, and theorems that industry applies to physical objects, objects that cannot satisfy said properties. This unit of instruction will give students the opportunities to see these relationships firsthand. In the metrology department at Raytheon, the tools of measurement used by engineers and technicians are pretty advanced technologically speaking. Although these tools will not be available to a general high school classroom, the basic ruler will allow the students to participate in, and experience, the same standards of measurement used by engineers and technicians. The systems of equations that the students are developing can Summer 2013: TTE 596 6 Understanding by Design Final Project by Lawrence Schneider be used by CNC technicians and engineers to cut the two-dimensional shapes. Through my research during the past two years at Raytheon, there are many programs that CNC machines use to cut material, both in twodimensions and three-dimensions. Cartesian systems of equations are not the only types of systems that exist, but they are the type my students will be familiar with and that can be further developed in the scope of the geometry class. The students will be given the opportunity to construct their pyramid and prism objects using materials of their choice, however paper and poster board will be the most accessible. I am looking forward to the types of materials my students use. Summer 2013: TTE 596 7 Understanding by Design Final Project by Lawrence Schneider Assessment Tool Name: Period: 1. Consider the shape below. Describe how you would identify the lengths of every unlabeled side. Assume that the triangles are right triangles. Your description should be in written form. I am not asking you, yet, to actually identify the side lengths. 4 4 2 3 Answer: Summer 2013: TTE 596 8 Understanding by Design Final Project by Lawrence Schneider 2. Using the techniques you described in answering the first question, identify the side lengths of the nonlabeled sides. Your lengths should be in exact form. Answer: 3. Consider the shape below. Describe how you would identify the side lengths that are not labeled. Assume the triangles are right triangles. z z y x Answer: Summer 2013: TTE 596 9 Understanding by Design Final Project by Lawrence Schneider 4. Use the techniques you described in answering Question 3 to identify the side lengths that are not labeled. Your values need to be in terms of x, y, and z. Answer: 5. Compare the techniques you described in answering Question 1 and Question 3. What similarities do you see? What differences do you see? Answer: 6. What do these similarities and differences mean in terms of the concept of identifying side lengths? Answer: Summer 2013: TTE 596 10 Understanding by Design Final Project by Lawrence Schneider 7. Consider the figure below. No side lengths are labeled. Describe the minimum amount of information necessary to be able to identify all of the side lengths in a general form. Answer: Summer 2013: TTE 596 11 Understanding by Design Final Project by Lawrence Schneider Rubric Level Understanding Novice There is no solution, or the solution has no relationship to the task. Inappropriate concepts are applied and/or procedures are used. The solution addresses none of the mathematical components presented in the task. Apprentice The solution is not complete, indicating that parts of the problem are not understood. The solution addresses some, but not all, of the mathematical components presented in the task. Practitioner The solution shows that the student has a broad understanding of the problem and the major concepts necessary for its solution. The solution addresses all of the components presented in the task. Expert The solution shows a deep understanding of the problem, including the ability to identify the appropriate mathematical concepts and the information necessary for its solution. The solution completely addresses all mathematical components presented in the task. The solution puts to use the underlying mathematical concepts upon which the task was designed. Strategies, Reasoning, Procedures No evidence of a strategy or procedure, or uses a strategy that does not help solve the provelm. No evidence of mathematical reasoning. There were so many errors in mathematical procedures that the problem could not be solved. Uses a strategy that is partially useful, leading some way towards a solution, but not to a full solution of the problem. Some evidence of mathematical reasoning. Could not completely carry out mathematical procedures. Some parts may be correct, but a correct answer is not achieved. Uses a strategy that leads to a solution of the problem. Uses effective mathematical reasoning. Mathematical procedures used. All parts are correct and a correct answer is achieved. Uses a very efficient and sophisticated strategy leading directly to a solution. Employs refined and complex reasoning. Applies procedures accurately to correctly solve the problem and verify the results. Verifies solutions and/or evaluates the reasonableness of the solution. Makes mathematically relevant observations and/or connections. Communication There is no explanation of the solution, the explanation cannot be understood or it is unrelated to the problem. There is no use or inappropriate use of mathematical representations (e.g. figures, diagrams, graphs, tables, etc.) There is no use, or mostly inappropriate use, of mathematical terminology and notation. There is an incomplete explanation, it may not be clearly represented. There is some use of appropriate mathematical representation. There is some use of mathematical terminology and notation appropriate of the problem. There is a clear explanation. There is appropriate use of accurate mathematical representation. There is effective use of mathematical terminology and notation. There is a clear, effective explanation detailing how the problem is solved. All of the steps are included so that the reader does not need to infer how and why decisions were made. Mathematical representation is actively used as a means of communicating ideas related to the solution of the problem. There is precise and appropriate use of mathematical terminology and notation.