History & Political Science Department. Criteria for Tenure and Promotion: Scholarship and Professional Development All faculty are expected to maintain an active program of scholarship and professional development. Tenured members of the History & Political Science Department will collectively review the progress of untenured faculty on an annual basis. Each untenured faculty member will be provided with written annual reviews, which will include an evaluation of scholarship and professional development. Untenured faculty should keep an updated record of all forms of scholarship and professional development. Examples of evidence, in descending order of significance, are listed below. Candidates should be aware that the collective production of scholarship and professional development is important. Deficiencies in some categories, therefore, may be overcome by exceptional production in other areas. Category 1 (advancement of knowledge -- essentially original scholarly research): Scholarly monographs based on original research Refereed articles published in scholarly journals, either in print or online form Chapters in books Articles with demonstrated scholarly merit that are published in legal journals, such as law review journals Documentary or critical editions with introduction, commentary, and footnotes written by the tenure candidate Translations of works of scholarship or important materials from other languages Papers or lectures delivered at international, national, regional, state or local conferences hosted by recognized academic organizations or institutions Category 2 (integration of knowledge -- synthesizing and reintegrating knowledge, revealing new patterns of meaning and new relationships between the parts and the whole): Textbooks Edited anthologies, journals, or series of volumes comprised of the work of other scholars Book reviews or essays dealing with historiography and evaluating scholarship in a specific field Articles in scholarly encyclopedias Category 3 (application of knowledge -- professional practice directly related to an individual’s scholarly specialization): Professional development awards -- e.g. NEH or Fulbright Historic preservation and cultural resource management projects Archival administration and the creation of bibliographies or databases Editing scholarly journals or newsletters Articles and review essays providing syntheses of scholarship that are intended for general audiences and are published in magazines, newspapers, or newsletters Reviews of scholarly manuscripts Organizing academic conferences, either independently or as an officer of a professional society Serving as panel chair or discussant at academic conferences Interpretations of scholarship presented at public meetings, delivered through museum exhibits, through film or television projects Expert testimony or consulting on public policy issues Commissioned studies and policy reports Category 4: (additional evidence of scholarly promise) Copies of works in progress Successful grant applications and reports on such grants Honors and awards for scholarly activity Membership in scholarly societies