Distance Computation of Supernovae Author: Sushil Jasper M.Sc., B.Ed., OCT Address: Physics Teacher, 227 Bridge Avenue, Windsor, Ontario N9B 2M1, Canada. Email: phys339@yahoo.com Abstract: The main task in astronomy is the determination of the distance of cosmological objects. Measurement of distance is quite important task and at the same instant, it is reasonably a challenged one too. Parallax method, Main-sequence fitting, RRLyrae variables Cepheid Variables are the popular primary distance indicator methods. Supernovae, Sunyaev-Zeldovich Effect are the popular secondary distance indicators. Also here it is important to note that the secondary distance indicators depend on primary indicators in distance calculation. The physical size and luminosity of the astronomical objects are highly related through the distance to their angular dimension and flux respectively. Hence astronomers can estimate the distance by knowing the physical size and luminosity in a distance –free method. Objects whose physical size and luminosity can be calculated in such a manner are termed as standard rulers and standard candles respectively. In this report we will see the role of supernovae as distance indicators. [1] Keywords: Star Distance; Binary system; Accretion; Supernovae; White dwarf; Definitions: :parsec; Mpc: Megaparsec; 1 pc = 3.08 × 1016m; 1 Mpc = 3.08 × 1022 m; Solar Radius = 6.9599 × 108 m (Equatorial); Solar Mass (Mʘ) = 1.989 × 1030 kg; 1 light year = 9.4605 × 1015 m. Introduction: In this journal the role of supernovae as cosmological distance indicators is highlighted by using a Maple software script. A supernova is the explosion of a star and it is the biggest explosion that takes place in space. The major types of supernovae are explained here and also the criterion in which the supernovae are categorized is also highlighted. Furthermore, the fact that the white dwarf stars are small but massive was theoretically explained by using the radius-mass relationship. Here SN 1969L is taken as an example to calculate its distance by Expanding Photosphere Method. EPM method is quite fit to calculate the distance of supernovae type II at a range from 50 kpc to 200 Mpc.[10] White dwarfs are the stars that have burned up the entire quantity of the hydrogen they once used as nuclear fuel. The fusion in a star’s core generates heat and outward pressure but this pressure is maintained in balance by the inward push of gravity due to the mass of the star. Classification of supernovae There are two main types of supernovae. Supernovae are classified by the characteristic of their spectra. The main two types are referred as Type I and Type II. Type I : There is no Hydrogen absorption lines in their spectrum. Type II: Here astronomers found the existence of Hydrogen absorption lines in their spectrum. Again type I is classified into 3 more sub categories and they are called as Type Ia, Ib, Ic. Page 1 of 18 Sushil Jasper _ Distance Computation of Supernovae SN Type Ia – In the spectra, there is No Hydrogen – No Helium – Strong Silicon lines. SN Type Ib: In the spectra, there is No Hydrogen lines – Strong Helium lines. SN Type Ic: In the spectra, there is No Hydrogen lines - No Helium lines – No Silicon lines. [2] Formation of Supernovae Type Ia: Supernova Type Ia is formed by a sudden nuclear fusion in a degenerate star. Here the transfer of matter has occurred in a close binary system. In Binary system, both stars move in elliptical orbits around a common centre of mass in which one of the stars is a white dwarf and the other may be a red giant star. Stars of mass less than 4 Mʘ normally will not explode. In most of the binary systems, the stars are well separated. For example, the distance between Sirius A and Sirius B is 20 pc and this distance is approximately 4000 times the solar radius. But in some cases, the separation may be small and hence the transfer of mass occurs easily which will lead the system to explode. A degenerate white dwarf may gather sufficient material from its companion star by accretion. Now the following thing happened to a white dwarf when its mass attains the Chandrasekhar‘s limit 1.44 Mʘ: * cannot support its weight with electron degeneracy pressure, this means weight of the star overcomes electron degeneracy pressure. * core temperature increases. * radius decreases * density increases and hence the mass increases * in this high temperature and high density, the fusion starts The gas put onto the white dwarf by its stellar companion is expected to be hydrogen and helium, but the strong gravity at the white dwarf's surface compresses it to densities and temperatures high enough to fuse it into carbon and oxygen. Now the white dwarf acts as a fusion bomb and explodes. Now due to the sudden gravitational collapse in its core, too much of gravitational potential energy will be released. The amount of energy was estimated by the astronomers as 1×1044 Joules. This amount is equivalent to the total amount of energy which could be radiated by Sun during its entire life time. The light curve of supernova type Ia is a graph which represents luminosity as a function of time after the explosion. The luminosity is due to the radioactive decay of Ni-56 to Co-56 to Fe-56 and some Silicon. The peak of all type of supernova type Ia has a maximum absolute magnitude of -19.3 approximately. Supernova Type Ia spectrum consists of silicon because silicon is one of the products of fusion. The main product of the fusion is iron. A type Ia supernova ejects about 1 solar mass of iron into interstellar medium. That is why iron is available in abundance in earth. Radioactive decay is the major source of energy in this process. [3] [10] Page 2 of 18 Sushil Jasper _ Distance Computation of Supernovae Ni : 56𝑁𝑖 + 𝑒 − → 56𝐶𝑜 + 𝜈𝑒 + 𝛾 Electron capture of 56Co : 56𝐶𝑜 + 𝑒 − → 56𝐹𝑒 + 𝜈𝑒 + 𝛾 Electron capture of Beta Decay of 56 56 Co : 56𝐶𝑜 → 56𝐹𝑒 + 𝑒 + + 𝜈𝑒 + 𝛾 - Decay time is 6.1 days - Decay time is 77.1 days The interaction of electrons with the surrounding medium starts and consequently the surrounding medium get heated and power the light curve. [10] The figure: 1 is a light curve of supernova Type Ia in which the luminosity relative to sun versus time. [4] The peak of the locus of the curve is due to the decay of Nickel (Ni) and the tail part is due to Cobalt (Co) and Iron (Fe). Reasons for Type 1a supernova as standard candle: The collapse always occurs at 1.4 Mʘ. At this juncture, the luminosity of the explosion remains constant. From the known luminosity, astronomers can estimate the distance. They are very bright with an absolute magnitude of -19.5 with a peak magnitude variation of 0.3 The mass transfer process so called accretion from a red giant to white dwarf can be briefed as below: [5] Two stars in the binary system – one is white dwarf and the other is red giant. Matter starts to spill from red to white. When white dwarf, reaches the Chandrasekhar limit 1.4Mʘ, it will explode. At this stage, fusion starts. Most of the carbon and Oxygen burnt into iron Ni, Co, Fe and some Si. Just a teaspoon of substance from a white dwarf would weigh as approximately five tons. It is quite incredible but it is the fact. The white dwarf stars are very dense and thick, their gravity is particularly extreme. At the time of explosion, the white dwarfs are very bright and the resultant light is about 5 billion times brighter than sun. A usual white dwarf is half the mass of Sun, but slightly bigger than Earth. A white dwarf of equal size of Earth has a density of 1 × 109 kg m -3. The density of a typical white dwarf star is between 107 and 1011 kgm-3. [6] Page 3 of 18 Sushil Jasper _ Distance Computation of Supernovae Actually, the mass of one cubic centimetre of white dwarf material weighs around 10000 kg !! The density of earth is 5400 kg m-3. Hence a white dwarf is approximately 200,000 times the density of earth. Radius - Mass Equation of White Dwarf White Dwarfs are high density celestial bodies. The mass of a white dwarf can be reasonably compared with the mass of Sun, but its volume can be compared to Earth’s volume. The faint luminosity of white dwarves is due to the emission of stored thermal energy. The nearest identified white dwarf is Sirius B - which is located at 8.6 light years away from earth. As the mass increases, gravity compresses the star into small volume. Hence they are small but massive and this face can be proved by Radius – Mass. Energy of the white dwarf = its Gravitational Potential Energy + its Kinetic Energy. The gravitational potential energy of a white dwarf [WD] can be represented as, 𝑬𝒈 = Kinetic energy is the motion of electrons and it will be = 𝑬𝑲 = −𝑮𝑴 𝑹 𝑵𝑷𝟐 𝟐𝒎 Where M – mass of WD star R – radius of WD star G = 6.67× 10-11 m3 kg-1 s-2 N – number of electrons in the unit mass of WD P – average electron momentum m – mass of electron [9.1 × 10-31 kg] Since the electrons are degenerated, we can estimate the average electron momentum P to be on the order of 𝒉 uncertainty by ∆𝑷∆𝒙 ≥ 𝟐𝝅 Here ∆𝑥 represents the distance between the electrons. ∆𝒙 ≈ 𝒏 per unit volume. −𝟏⁄ 𝟑 where n – is the number of electrons 𝟐 Hence 𝑬𝑲 = 𝑵ħ𝟐 𝒏𝟑 𝟐𝒎 But we know that n = Page 4 of 18 𝑵𝑴 𝑹𝟑 where NM – is the total number of electrons in the entire WD. Sushil Jasper _ Distance Computation of Supernovae 𝟐 Hence we can write 𝑬𝑲 = 𝟐 𝑵ħ𝟐 𝑵𝟑 𝑴𝟑 𝟐𝒎𝑹𝟐 WD will be in equilibrium when the Ek + Eg is minimised. At this stage, Ek = Eg 𝟓 𝑮𝑴 𝑹 = 𝟐 𝑵𝟑 ħ𝟐 𝑴𝟑 𝟐𝒎𝑹𝟐 𝟓 Hence R = 𝟐 𝑵𝟑 ħ𝟐 𝑴𝟑 𝟐𝒎𝑮𝑴 Now we can see that R ∝ 𝟓 𝑵 𝟑 ħ𝟐 = 𝟏 𝟐𝒎𝑮𝑴𝟑 𝟏 𝟏 𝑴𝟑 Here we can see the Radius of the white dwarf star is inversely proportional to the cube root of the mass. Hence though the white dwarfs are small they are more massive. [6] Supernovae Type II Supernovae type II is massive supergiant stars. Normally a supergiant must be young – approximately 1 million years. In terms of the source of energy, type Ia corresponds to Thermonuclear Fusion [C and O to Ni, Co Fe] and type II corresponds to core collapse of iron core. Crab Nebula is the remnant of Type II supernova and it consists of a neutron star in the centre. Tycho supernova remnant is the remnant of type Ia supernova and it is very rich in iron. Core-collapse Supernovae: In sun, in its core, H is fused into He and discharging thermal energy which heats the sun’s core. This provides the adequate outward pressure. This helps the sun’s layers against the collapse and maintains hydrostatic equilibrium. This is something good for the earth. 𝟒 𝟏𝟏𝑯 → 𝟒𝟐𝑯𝒆 + 𝟐 𝟎𝟏𝒆 . Hence mass defect = 4 × 1.00813 – 4.00386 = 0.02866 amu. To calculate the energy equivalent to 0.02866 amu, 1 amu = 1. 66 × 10-27 kg. E =1. 66 × 10-27c2 = 1.494 × 10-10 Joules. 1 eV = 1.6 × 10-19Joules. Page 5 of 18 Sushil Jasper _ Distance Computation of Supernovae Hence 1.494 × 10-10 J = 1.494×10−10 1.6×10−19 = 933750000eV = 933 Mev. The standard theoretical value is 931 MeV Energy released by this mass defect = 0.02866 × 931MeV = 26 MeV. This energy is not enough to fuse Helium. * Hence H in the core get exhausted - fusion starts to slow down- gravity makes the core to contract. * This contraction increases the temperature to start the He fusion. * The electron degeneracy pressure and energy generated in the fusion can withstand the collapse and maintain hydrostatic equilibrium. In the case of stars of mass less than 8Mʘ, the carbon formed by Helium fusion does not fuse and the stars started to cool down and finally turn into White Dwarf. If it gets a nearby companion star, there will be a chance for supernova Ia. But for more massive stars, the fusion starts from H, He and continues as per the order of periodic table. The electron degeneracy pressure and energy generated during fusion are far enough to continue the fusion, to prevent from collapse, to maintain hydrostatic equilibrium.[8] The steps of huge massive stars before their collapse can be shown as in Table: 1 Core-Burning Nuclear Fusion Stages of a 25 Solar Mass Star Process Major Fuel Main Products Temperature (Kelvin) Duration Hydrogen burning Triple-Alpha process Carbon burning Neon burning Oxygen burning Silicon burning Hydrogen Helium Carbon Neon Oxygen Silicon Helium Carbon, Oxygen Ne, Na, Mg, Al O, Mg Si, S, Ar, Ca Nickel (decays into Iron) Table: 1 7 × 107 2 ×108 8 × 108 1.6 × 109 1.8 × 109 2.5 × 109 1 × 107 years 1 ×106 years 1 × 103 years 3 years 0.3 years 5 days This process lasts until a core of Fe, Ni is formed. Then there is no fusion in Fe, Ni since there is no output energy as these elements have high Binding Energy per nucleon. Now the core is with huge gravitational pressure and hence the core becomes very dense. Page 6 of 18 Sushil Jasper _ Distance Computation of Supernovae When the mass of the core exceeds the threshold limit called Chandrasekhar limit 1.4Mʘ, the degeneracy pressure only cannot withstand against gravity, and hence it will collapse. At this juncture, the outer part of the core reaches a velocity up to 70000 km s-1 towards the centre. Stars of mass greater than 50Mʘ, the star concerned will collapse directly into black hole without forming supernova. Type II, Type Ib and Type Ic supernovas are termed as core-collapse supernovas. Here it goes something like the aforementioned process. When the nuclear power source at the center or core of a star is exhausted, the core starts to collapse. Within a period of a second, a neutron star or a black hole, if the star is extremely massive will be formed. The formation of a neutron star releases an enormous amount of energy in the form of neutrinos and heat. SN 1987A was discovered on 23 Feb 1987. This famous supernova star is very important to the world of astronomy because of its close vicinity and this was the first Supernova star that could be seen by the bare eye. Since it was quite near, it helped astronomers to enhance their observations over it. [9] During this period, Hubble Telescope was not in orbit but it made very good observation of the expanding gaseous remains of the star. Robert Kirshner of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics in Cambridge, USA has used the Hubble telescope to monitor/observe the supernova. Supernova 1987A, blazed with tremendous power, which was equivalent to the power of 100 million suns for several months since its discovery on Feb. 23, 1987. Kirshner said "The sharp pictures from the Hubble telescope help us to ask and answer new questions about Supernova 1987A," He further added "In fact, without Hubble we wouldn't even know what to ask”. The iron in living body blood was manufactured in supernova explosions. Supernova 1987A is 163,000 lightyears away from us and located in the Large Magellanic Cloud and this has actually blown up about 161,000 B.C, but its light was able to observe only in 1987. [14] Techniques to find the distance of supernovae Astronomers are using the following mentioned three methods to find the distance of supernovae: a) Expanding Photosphere method [EPM] b) Expanding Shockfront method [ESM] c) Standard Candles. In the first two methods, the distance is measured by calculating the linear radius and angular radius. The third one is by comparing with the star’s known absolute magnitude and then by the inverse square law to calculate the distance. Page 7 of 18 Sushil Jasper _ Distance Computation of Supernovae Expanding Photosphere Method [EPM]: Supernova type II works as a good distance indicator by Expanding Photosphere Method [EPM]. By using this method, we can calculate the distance of the supernova directly from the linear radius and angular radius. The angular radius will be calculated with the assumption that the supernova is optically thick in its interior part and hence it can be treated as a blackbody. [10] In 1974, Robert Kirshner and John Kwan firstly used the Badde-Wasselink method to calculate the distances of supernovae.[11] The method has been already used by Halton Arp to compare the observed and predicted expansion velocities in supernovae in the year 1961.[7] Later Brian P. Schmidt , an American born Australian Astronomer [Australian National University – Western Creek – Australia], Robert Kirshner [Harvard Smithsonian Centre for Astrophysics – USA]and Ronald Eastman [University of California –USA] did the experiment to find the distance of 10 selected Supernovae Type II [including the famous SN 1987A] by using the Expanding Photosphere Method. Brian Schmidt got the Nobel Prize in Physics jointly with Adam Riess and Saul Pelmuter during 2011 for their work on the ‘Accelerating Universe’ and the Nobel lecture dated 8 Dec 2011 can be seen through. [12] For my calculation, I used the data of B, V magnitude and vused of the supernova SN 1969L from the journal authored by Brian Schmidt, Robert Kirshner, and Ronald Eastman and published by American Astronomical Society. [11] I did calculate the i) ii) iii) iv) temperature angular size radius of the photosphere at time (t), and finally the distance of supernova star SN 1969L I did my calculations by i) Manual calculation method – time: 14 days ii) Maple –version 10 student version program and iii) Excel software program My solutions have very good coincidence with the distance data provided by Brian Schmidt, Robert Kirshner and Ronald Eastman in their Astrophysical journal, 395: 366-386, 20 Aug 1992. [11] Supernova star SN 1969Lwas discovered by astronomers on 2 December 1969 in the outer zone of the galaxy NGC 1058 as an apparent magnitude [𝑚𝐵 ] =13 object. The Photographic spectra and photometry Page 8 of 18 Sushil Jasper _ Distance Computation of Supernovae [BV] of this supernova were studied and the results were published by the astronomers Ciatti, Rossino and Bertola in 1971. In the year 1974, Kirshner and Kwan published the spectra of this supernova. The data are reasonably extensive and large with good quality and the results proved that SN 1969L was a Type II supernova star. [11] EPM assumes the principle that supernovae type II radiate as dilute blackbodies. So we can calculate the angular size of the photosphere of the supernova by using the below mentioned formula: 𝜽= 𝑹 𝑫 𝒇 = √𝜻𝟐 𝝅𝑩𝜸 (𝑻) if redshift z<<1 𝝊 where θ - angular dimension of the photosphere of the Supernova R - radius of the photosphere D - distance to the Supernova fγ - observed flux density of the SN, and Bυ (T) - the Planck function at any temperature T Since the supernovae are not perfect blackbodies, Kirshner include a correction factor, , but in the calculation, he gave the value for =1 which is assigned for blackbody. The radius of the photosphere R = vused (t – t0) + R0 where vused - observed velocity, t - elapsed time since the time of explosion, t0. Calculation of the distance of Type II SN 1969L by Expanding Photosphere Method [EPM]: Data for time, B, V from Table 3A and vused from Table 3B of the journal [11] Calculation of Distance for a period of 14 days: data can be seen in the second row of the table: 2 The The value of distance of all the nine days is calculated by using excel and the spreadsheet is attached in page: 17. B = 13.40 V= 13.25 v used = 8500 km s-1 = 8.5×106 ms-1 t – t0 = 14 days Page 9 of 18 Sushil Jasper _ Distance Computation of Supernovae = 1.2 × 106s i) The radius of the photosphere of the supernova [R]: R = vused (t – t0) + R0 and R0 is very small and negligible. Hence R = v [ t – t0] R = 8.5×106 ×1.2 × 106 = 1.03 × 1013 m Hence the radius of the photosphere of the supernova SN 1969L = 1.03 × 1013 m ii) The temperature of the supernova [T]: The colour index means the difference in magnitudes at two different wavelengths. Hence B-V colour index means the difference between magnitudes in the blue and visual regions of spectrum. 𝟏𝟎𝟒 𝑲 = 𝟏. 𝟔𝟎𝟓 (𝑩 − 𝑽) + 𝟎. 𝟔𝟕 𝑻 104 T= [1.605 (0.15]+0.67] = 10980 K iii) Angular size theta [𝜽] of the photosphere of the supernova: 𝜽= 𝒇𝜸 𝑹 = √ 𝟐 𝑫 𝜻 𝝅𝑩𝝊 (𝑻) 𝟐𝒉𝒄𝟐 Plank Curve formula tells , 𝑩λ (𝑻) = 𝒉𝒄 𝝀𝟓 𝒆𝝀𝒌𝑻 −𝟏 We need to convert 𝑩𝝀 (𝑻) into 𝑩υ (𝑻) by using c = 𝜆υ We know 𝑩𝝀 (𝑻) = 𝑩υ (𝑻) 𝑩𝝀 = 𝑩υ 𝒅υ 𝒅𝜆 From c = 𝜆υ, υ=c𝜆−1 On differentiating υ with respect to 𝜆, Page 10 of 18 Sushil Jasper _ Distance Computation of Supernovae 𝑑υ 𝑐 I got 𝑑 𝜆 = − 𝑑υ |𝑑 𝜆 | = 𝜆2 𝑐 𝜆2 Hence 𝑩υ 𝒄 𝑩𝝀 = 𝟐 𝜆 𝑩υ = 𝑩𝝀 = 𝝀𝟐 𝒄 2ℎ𝑐 2 𝝀𝟐 ℎ𝑐 𝜆5 𝑒 𝜆𝑘𝑇 −1 𝒄 𝑩υ (𝑻) = 𝟐𝒉𝒄 𝝀𝟑 𝟏 𝒉υ 𝒆𝒌𝑻 Finally 𝑩υ (𝑻) = = −𝟏 𝟐𝒉υ𝟑 𝒄𝟐 𝟐𝒉𝒄 𝒄𝟑 υ𝟑 𝒉υ 𝒆𝒌𝑻 −𝟏 𝟏 𝒉υ 𝒆𝒌𝑻 w/m2/Hz/Sr −𝟏 * A blackbody will absorbs all amount of light which hits it. * This blackbody will emit thermal radiation – emission of photon is a good example of this phenomenon. * The energy emitted per unit area depends on the blackbody’s temperature. * The scientist Max Planck characterized the light coming from a blackbody. * The aforementioned equation predicts the radiation of a blackbody at different temperatures and frequency is known as ‘Planck’s law’. I used the following online magnitude converter to get the equivalent Flux http://ssc.spitzer.caltech.edu/warmmission/propkit/pet/magtojy/ The output will be in Milli-Jy and can be converted into MKS system by multiplying 10 - 29 w m-2 Hz-1 B = 13.4 has an effective wavelength of 0.43 µ m and its corresponding frequency can be calculated by using c = λυ. Hence υ = c/λ = = 6.97 ×1014 Hz 𝐵υ (10980) = and the 𝑓υ = 18 mJy = 18 ×10 - 29 w m-2 Hz-1 [2×6.634 ×10−34 ×[6.97×1014 ]3 [3×108 ]−2] Page 11 of 18 6.634 ×10−34×6.97×10 𝑒 1.38×10−23×10980 14 −1 Sushil Jasper _ Distance Computation of Supernovae 2.48×10-7 w/m2/Hz/Sr = 𝜽= 𝑹 𝑫 𝒇 = √𝜻𝟐 𝝅𝑩𝜸 (𝑻) 𝝊 where 𝜁 is the correction factor which accounts the effects of flux dilution. For a blackbody, 𝜁 =1. 𝟏𝟖 ×𝟏𝟎𝟐𝟗 𝜽 = √𝟏×𝟑.𝟏𝟒×𝟐.𝟒𝟖×𝟏𝟎−𝟕 = 𝟏. 𝟓 × 𝟏𝟎−𝟏𝟏 𝒓𝒂𝒅𝒊𝒂𝒏 Hence the angular size of the photosphere of the Supernova 1969L is 1.5 ×10-11 radian iv) Distance of the supernova [D]: 𝑹 D=𝜽 = 𝟏.𝟎𝟑×𝟏𝟎𝟏𝟑 𝟏.𝟓 × 𝟏𝟎−𝟏𝟏 = 𝟔. 𝟕𝟕 × 𝟏𝟎𝟐𝟑 𝐦 1 Mpc = 3.08 ×1022 m Hence D = 6.77 × 1023 3.08 × 1022 = 21.98 Mpc Hence the supernova SN 1969L was located at a distance of 21.98 Mpc from the earth. This value is very close with Briyan P. Schmidt’s team’s calculated value in their research journal of the distance of this supernova SN 1969L which is 21.3 Mpc I computed this calculation by using Maple Computer Program and got the answer 21.97 Mpc and the Maple worksheet is attached in the page: 12. Also I have calculated the distance for all the 9 observed days by using Excel program and attached the spreadsheet in the page: 16. My excel program calculated the distance value for t = 14 days as 22.5 Mpc. Computation of the Distance of the supernova star SN1969L by Maple Script: > `SN 1969L: Calculations for t=14 days`; SN 1969L: Calculations for t=14 days > unprotect(D): > `Universal constants:`; c:=3E8; `(light speed~m/s)`; h:=6.634E-34; Page 12 of 18 Sushil Jasper _ Distance Computation of Supernovae `(Planck's constant)`; k:=1.38E-23; `(Boltzmann constant)`; Universal constants: c := 0.3 10 9 (light speed~m/s) h := 0.6634 10 -33 (Planck's constant) k := 0.138 10 -22 (Boltzmann constant) > `Data for t=14 days:`; zeta:=1; `(correction factor)`; t:=14*24*60*60; `(elapsed time after explosion~s)`; v_used:=8500E3; `(expansion velocity~m/s)`; R:=v_used*t; `(radius of SN~m`; B:=13.4; `(apparent magnitude of blue light~non-dim)`; V:=13.25; `(apparent magnitude of visible light~non-dim)`; T:=1E4/(1.605*(B-V)+0.67); `(temperature of wave~deg K)`; Data for t=14 days: := 1 (correction factor) t := 1209600 Page 13 of 18 Sushil Jasper _ Distance Computation of Supernovae (elapsed time after explosion~s) v_used := 0.8500 10 7 (expansion velocity~m/s) R := 0.1028160000 10 14 (radius of SN~m B := 13.4 (apparent magnitude of blue light~non-dim) V := 13.25 (apparent magnitude of visible light~non-dim) T := 10979.96157 (temperature of wave~deg K) > `Planck's B_nu(T):`; B_nu:=(T,nu)->(2*h*nu^3/c^2)*(exp((h*nu)/(k*T))-1)^(-1); Planck's B_nu(T): h 3 B_nu := ( T , ) 2 h k T c e 1 > `Magnitude/Flux Converter:`; 2 `input:`; `Filter: Johnson B`; B:=13.4; `(magnitude for blue)`; `output:`; f_nu:=18E-3*1E-26; `(flux density~mks)`; lambda:=.43E-6; `(effective wavelength~m)`; nu:=c/lambda; `(effective frequency~Hz)`; Magnitude/Flux Converter: input: Page 14 of 18 Sushil Jasper _ Distance Computation of Supernovae Filter: Johnson B B := 13.4 (magnitude for blue) output: f_nu := 0.18 10 -27 (flux density~mks) := 0.43 10 -6 (effective wavelength~m) := 0.6976744186 10 15 (effective frequency~Hz) > `Angular distance theta(~rad):`; theta:=(T)->sqrt((f_nu/(zeta^2*Pi*B_nu(T,nu)))); Angular distance theta(~rad): := T f_nu B_nu ( T , ) 2 > `angular distance at t=14 days:`; evalf(theta(T)); `(radians)`; angular distance at t=14 days: 0.1520908879 10 -10 (radians) > `linear distance at t=14 days:`; D:=(3.25E-23)*evalf(R/theta(T)); `(linear distance~Mpc)`; linear distance at t=14 days: D := 21.97054700 (linear distance~Mpc) > Page 15 of 18 Sushil Jasper _ Distance Computation of Supernovae Page 16 of 18 Sushil Jasper _ Distance Computation of Supernovae Conclusion Supernovae play a dynamic role in calculating the distance of galaxies from the earth. Supernova as distance indicator technique has been popular since the past few years. Supernova technology is highly used by the astronomers in solving many problems in cosmology including Hubble Constant and cosmological parameters. We have seen the two major types of supernovae. Among these two, the type Ia has more attention by the astronomers and relatively less attention for type II because they are considerably fainter. Anyhow one can assume that type II will stand as an independent class of objects and the results of their studies will be useful to confirm and compare the results of type Ia. In the forthcoming years, supernovae studies will become more important for astronomers as the high technology enhanced telescopes like 30MT and Great Magellan Telescope are likely to start functioning in the nearest future. Hence it is very sure that many new theories for celestial objects with high redshift will be discovered in the future. References 1. Pearson, Chris P. "Evolutionary constraints from infrared source counts." Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 325.4 (2001): 1511-1526. 2. Harkness, Robert P., and J. Craig Wheeler. "Classification of supernovae." Supernovae. Springer New York, 1990. 1-29. 3. Niedermann, Florian. "Supernova Light Curves." 4. Branch, Asymptotic Giant. "From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia." (2003). 5. Carroll, Bradley W., and Dale A. Ostlie. An introduction to modern astrophysics and cosmology. Vol. 1. 2006. 6. Regmi, Jeevan. "Dark Energy and Dark Matter." Himalayan Physics 4 (2013): 91-94. 7. Arp, Halton. "The Globular Cluster M5." The Astrophysical Journal 135 (1962): 311. 8. Murdoch, Lachlan, et al. "Encyclopedia> Star." 9. Shapiro, Stuart L., and Saul A. Teukolsky. Black holes, white dwarfs and neutron stars: the physics of compact objects. John Wiley & Sons, 2008. 10. Webster, Josh. "Galaxies and Supermassive Black Holes." 11. Kirshner, R. P., and J. Kwan. "Distances to extragalactic supernovae." The Astrophysical Journal 193 (1974): 27-36. Page 17 of 18 Sushil Jasper _ Distance Computation of Supernovae 12. Schmidt, B. P. (2013). The path to measuring an accelerating Universe. Physics-Uspekhi, 56(10). 13. Kirshner, R. P., and J. Kwan. "Distances to extragalactic supernovae." The Astrophysical Journal 193 (1974): 27-36. 14. Arnett, W. David, et al. "Supernova 1987A." Annual review of astronomy and astrophysics 27 (1989): 629700. Page 18 of 18 Sushil Jasper _ Distance Computation of Supernovae