VIA Electronic Mail US Global Change Research Program 1717 Pennsylvania Ave, NW, Suite 250 Washington, D.C. 20006 USA E-mail: http://www.globalchange.gov/health-assessment Re: Public Review Draft, The Impacts of Climate Change on Human Health in the United States: A Scientific Assessment 5 June 2015 To the USGCRP: The Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) would like to offer these comments concerning the Public Review Draft, The Impacts of Climate Change on Human Health in the United States: A Scientific Assessment. NRDC’s staff represents public health, environmental policy and environmental science professionals with experience and expertise in climate change impacts, adaptation and preparedness planning and implementation, and in climate change policy guidance formulation. NRDC is among the nation's most effective environmental action organizations. We use law, science and the support of 1.4 million members and online activists to protect the planet's wildlife, wild places and ensure a safe and healthy environment for all living things. Founded in 1970 by a group of lawyers at the forefront of the environmental movement, NRDC attorneys helped write some of America's bedrock environmental laws. Today, our staff of more than 400 lawyers, scientists and policy experts work out of offices in New York, Washington, Chicago, Los Angeles, San Francisco and Beijing. We would like to congratulate the USGCRP in producing this report to systematically assess the link between observed and projected changes to the climate, and associated human health impacts. The goals of the Report, “…to provide a comprehensive, evidence-based, and, where possible, quantitative estimation of observed and projected climate change related health impacts in the United States” (p. 23, lines 13-15), could not be more timely with the upcoming finalization of the first-ever standards to limit heat-trapping carbon pollution from power plants in the U.S1. We hope these comments can help strengthen the readability and utility of the report, which describes more fully some of the harmful health impacts of climate change, the worst of which can be avoided by limiting carbon pollution and making climate-health preparedness a top priority. We would like to provide brief comment in several areas, including: Make the quantitative case study results more prominent. The case studies that illustrate climate-change quantitative estimates of health impacts and exposures are hard to locate in the Report. They are listed in the Preface (on p.24, lines 13-17), and include: Temperature-Related Death and Illness; Air Quality Impacts; Water-Related Illnesses; Vectorborne Disease; Food Safety, Nutrition, and Distribution; Extreme Weather; and Mental Health and Well-Being. Since this information is central to the Report and critically important to readers, it should be more evident throughout the Report and any associated materials, and made more prominent for readers. For example, a Table that compiles the quantitative findings and associated graphics in one easily-located section of the report would improve the accessibility of key findings for many readers. Highlight the need for climate-health tracking and environmental surveillance data, at comparable spatial and temporal scales. There is a lack of health surveillance data for many health outcomes that are being impacted by climate change (e.g., heat waves/extreme heat). Available health surveillance data are often mismatched in both spatial and temporal scales with reference to the relevant climate, weather, and natural and built environment data. The report should show how multi-agency surveillance and climate/weather/environmental data collection and sharing need to be improved and better coordinated in order to facilitate our ability to better estimate present and future burdens of climate effects on the nation’s health. Two examples are: Environmental Protection Agency. 2014. Clean Power Plan Proposed Rule. http://www2.epa.gov/carbonpollution-standards/clean-power-plan-proposed-rule. Last Accessed 6 June 2014. 1 2 Heat-Health Syndromic Surveillance systems are in place in several US cities and states that provide ways to rapidly assess the daily burden of extreme heat on community health. With climate change fueling increases in the frequency, intensity and duration of heat waves2, these syndromic surveillance systems can provide more communities with the means to inform and quickly evaluate levels of heat preparedness and response strategies that are needed.3 The Report should briefly describe these syndromic heat surveillance systems as a case study, so that other locations and stakeholders can consider the benefits of their development and implementation. Daily aeroallergen monitoring and associated respiratory health outcome data is needed to more fully assess the climate-health risks of longer pollen production seasons, changes in allergenicity, and changing pollen concentrations associated with higher temperatures and higher atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations. As noted on page 101, lines 18-24, “… with respect to research needs that focus on threats from exposures to aeroallergens, there are recognized gaps in disease surveillance and data collection, including measurements of daily aeroallergen concentrations; in monitoring and modeling aeroallergen and ecosystem dynamics across geographic and time scales; in understanding the synergistic effects from simultaneous exposure to aeroallergens and ambient air pollutants; and in improving methods for quantifying the costs of illnesses, including lost productivity (Reid and Gamble 2009; Beggs 2004, 2010; Canova et al. 2013; Cecchi et al. 2010; Kinney 2008; Selgrade et al. 2006).” Mapping studies have considered the co-occurrence of pollen-producing ragweed and unhealthy ozone exceedance days4, but developing monitoring networks that collect this data on comparable temporal and spatial scales would allow for better local assessments of climate-respiratory health effects. 2 Meehl GA, Tebaldi C. 2004. More Intense, More Frequent, and Longer Lasting Heat Waves in the 21st Century. Science 305(5686):994-997 (13 August 2004), DOI: 10.1126/science.1098704 . 3 Manangan AP, Uejio CK, Saha S, Schramm PJ, Marinucci GD, Brown CL, Hess JJ, and Luber G. Assessing health vulnerability to climate change: A guide for health departments. Climate and Health Technical Report Series, 2014. (Available at: http://wwwdev.cdc.gov/climateandhealth/pubs/AssessingHealthVulnerabilitytoClimateChange.pdf). 4 Declet-Barreto J, Alcorn S. 2015. Sneezing and Wheezing: How Climate Change Could Increase Ragweed Allergies, Air Pollution, and Asthma. Natural Resources Defense Council (R:15-04-A, May 2015). (Available at: http://www.nrdc.org/globalwarming/sneezing/files/sneezing-report-2015.pdf). 3 Streamline and organize the report to enhance its accessibility and utility for the intended user community. Although the report contains much useful information, it is overtly long and not highly accessible to many lay audiences. As stated on p.23, lines 16-18 of the Draft Report, the intended user community includes, “…public health officials, urban and disaster response planners, decision makers, and other stakeholders within and outside of government who are interested in better understanding the risks climate change presents to human health.” A shorter, summary version of the report for less technicallyoriented users might include the excellent summary material from the Executive Summary, Chapter 1, and tables and graphics that summarize the quantitative findings. Thank you for your consideration and the opportunity to submit these comments on the Public Review Draft. Respectfully, Juan Declet-Barreto, PhD Climate and Health Science Fellow Climate and Clean Air Program Natural Resources Defense Council 1152 15th Street NW, Suite 300 Washington, DC 20005 Jdeclet-barreto@nrdc.org T 202.513.6268 F 202.289.1060 Kim Knowlton, DrPH Senior Scientist, Science Center Deputy Director Natural Resources Defense Council 40 West 20th Street, 11th floor New York, NY 10011-4231 phone 212.727.4579; fax 212.727.1773 kknowlton@nrdc.org 4 5