Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD) Year 5 Evaluation of the Government of Alberta’s FASD 10 Year Strategic Plan Outcome 1a January 31, 2013 Outcome 1a: Albertans understand that alcohol use during pregnancy can lead to FASD, that FASD can be prevented and that FASD prevention is a shared responsibility. Evaluation Question 1a: Has there been an increase in understanding among Albertans that: alcohol use during pregnancy can lead to FASD; FASD can be prevented; and FASD prevention is a shared responsibility? Prepared by: Cecilia Bukutu, MPhil, PhD Tara Hanson, MACT Suzanne Tough, MSc, PhD 2 Acknowledgements The Alberta Centre for Child, Family and Community Research (The Centre) would like to acknowledge the work and efforts of the University of Alberta Population Research Lab, who implemented the survey. Suggested Citation Bukutu, C., Hanson, T., & Tough, S. Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder Awareness Campaign Project Final Report prepared for The Alberta Centre for Child Family and Community Research, 2012. Related Materials Tough S, Clark M, Hicks M, Clarren S. Attitudes and Approaches of Canadian providers to preconception counseling and the prevention of Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders (FASDs) JFAS Int 2005;3:e3 Tough, S. Clarke, M., Hicks, M. Knowledge and attitudes of Canadian Psychiatrists regarding fetal alcohol; spectrum disorder. The Canadian Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Review. 2003;12(3):64-71. Additional Copies Questions about this survey or requests for copies of this report may be directed to Tara Hanson, Director of Knowledge and Partnership Development (780) 408-8730 or thanson@research4children.com. 3 Executive Summary Background The purpose of this report was to assess Albertans’ awareness of Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD). A telephone survey was conducted, asking Albertans questions in the following categories: general FASD knowledge (e.g. Do you think FASD can be prevented?), contact with FASD (e.g. Do you know anyone who you think might have FASD?), support (e.g. Do you think a woman should be supported by others not to drink while pregnant?), and behaviour (e.g. If you saw a pregnant woman that you knew drinking alcohol, would you tell her that using alcohol during pregnancy might harm the baby?). The telephone survey consisted of ten questions, and 1203 adult Albertans responded. Participants were equally distributed between Edmonton, Calgary, and other areas in Alberta, and there was an equal distribution of males and females. Respondents also had similar demographic characteristics when compared to the general Albertan population. Key Results 85.7% of respondents have heard of FASD. Over 96% of Albertans who have heard about FASD know that alcohol use during pregnancy causes FASD, that FASD can be prevented, and that the best way to prevent FASD is by not using alcohol while trying to get pregnant and during pregnancy. 14.3% of respondents had not heard of FASD. These respondents were more likely to be male (62.8%), between the ages of 18 and 44 years, non-Caucasian, and born outside of Canada. A significant proportion of Albertans know someone with FASD (40.1%) and/or someone who cares for an individual with FASD (39.1%). Respondents most likely to know a person with FASD were: aged between the ages of 25 to 34 years (45.0%) and 55 to 64 years (46.2%), employed, and living outside of Calgary (either Edmonton or other areas of Alberta). Respondents likely to know someone who cares for an individual with FASD were female, between 25 and 34-years-old, employed, Canadian born, and living outside of Calgary. Most respondents (89%) reported that they would tell a pregnant woman they knew who was drinking alcohol, that using alcohol during pregnancy may harm the baby. Those most likely to tell a woman were: female, between 25 and 34-years-old, living outside of Calgary and employed. Nearly half (49.7%) of the respondents reported that they would tell a pregnant woman they did not know, who was drinking alcohol, that using alcohol during pregnancy might harm the baby. Those most likely to tell a woman were: female, between 25 and 34-years-old, living outside of Calgary, with an annual household income below $40,000/year. Almost all participants responded that they believed a woman should be supported by others not to drink while pregnant, regardless of whether or not they had heard of FASD (98.6%) or not (95%). When broken down by groups (healthcare provider, partner/spouse, family, friends, community, or government), the woman’s family and partner/spouse were identified most often as the main sources of support, both by respondents who had and had not heard of FASD. 4 Healthcare providers, government, and community were all implicated by many respondents (60+%) as having roles in supporting pregnant women not to drink. Recommendations To address some of the limitations related to data collection, future surveys should include a wider range of individuals: those under the age of 18, non English-speaking Albertans, individuals who only own cell phones or who do not have a telephone. For a better understanding of the needs of caregivers, future studies could also include questions about caregivers’ needs for and access to information and support. The findings regarding supporting pregnant women not to drink suggest that Albertans recognize that collective efforts are required to support women at risk of an alcohol exposed pregnancy. This finding also suggests that health care providers, communities, and government should feel empowered to take a leading role in the implementation of effective, accessible, and respectful supports for women at risk. Additionally, those working in agencies and programs where they may encounter women at risk of drinking during pregnancy should have training that enables them to identify these women and help them by providing supports or referrals. In this study, many Albertans responded that they would be willing to discuss alcohol use during pregnancy with women they do not know, which may reflect the care and concern Albertans have for those in their communities. This finding is further evidence that policy and decision makers can be reassured that actions taken to support women would be valued by Albertans. 5 Table of Contents Outcome 1a: ............................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Evaluation Question .....................................................................................................................................................................7 Introduction and Background ............................................................................................................................................ 7 Methods ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Demographics ........................................................................................................................................................................... 9 Respondents’ Knowledge/Awareness about FASD ................................................................................................. 10 General FASD Knowledge........................................................................................................................................................ 10 Contact with FASD ..................................................................................................................................................................... 12 Support ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 16 Behaviour ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 20 Discussion ................................................................................................................................................................................. 24 Limitations ............................................................................................................................................................................... 25 Recommendations................................................................................................................................................................. 26 References ................................................................................................................................................................................ 27 Appendix A: Characteristics of Survey Respondents .............................................................................................. 28 Characteristics of Survey Respondents ............................................................................................................................. 28 Appendix B: About the Centre .......................................................................................................................................... 30 About the Alberta Centre for Child, Family, and Community Research ............................................................ 30 6 Research Report: Outcome 1a Outcome 1a: Albertans understand that alcohol use during pregnancy can lead to FASD, that FASD can be prevented, and that FASD prevention is a shared responsibility. Evaluation Question 1: Has there been an increase in understanding among Albertans that: alcohol use during pregnancy can lead to FASD; FASD can be prevented; and FASD prevention is a shared responsibility? Introduction and Background Drinking alcohol is a common social activity for many women. In a Canadian Addiction Survey, 76.8% of the female respondents reported drinking in the past year.1 Alcohol use during pregnancy can result in serious life-long health outcomes for the baby. The Public Health Agency of Canada2 warns that there is no safe amount or safe time to drink alcohol during pregnancy. Outcome 1a of the Government of Alberta FASD 10 Year Strategic Plan addresses the issue of Albertans awareness of FASD. Outcome 1a is: Albertans understand that alcohol use during pregnancy can lead to FASD, that FASD can be prevented and that FASD prevention is a shared responsibility. Evaluation Question 1a: Has there been an increase in understanding among Albertans that: alcohol use during pregnancy can lead to FASD; FASD can be prevented; and FASD prevention is a shared responsibility? In 2003, Alberta formed a Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder Cross-Ministry Committee (FASD-CMC) with a mandate to be the primary driving force behind the delivery of FASD programs offered by the provincial government. This report is intended to address Evaluation Question 1a by providing a measurement of the FASD-CMC’s awareness and prevention efforts. Specifically, the results presented in this report establish a baseline measure for Outcome 1a of the Strategic Plan. Methods The Centre submitted research questions to the Population Research Laboratory (PRL) at the University of Alberta for inclusion in the 2011 Alberta Survey. The Alberta Survey is an annual telephone survey, which explores public opinion on a wide range of public policy concerns. The PRL conducted the 2011 Alberta Survey from May 25 to June 22, 2011. 1203 Albertans over the age of 18 participated, with approximately equal representation from men and women, and the same number of individuals from Calgary, Edmonton and the rest of the province. The overall response rate for this survey was 26.1%. 7 The Population Research Lab provided the survey data to The Centre for analysis which was conducted by their Child and Youth Data Laboratory. This report includes responses to questions as well as demographic information about the population surveyed. It serves as a baseline measure to define the extent to which Albertans understand that alcohol use during pregnancy can lead to FASD, that FASD can be prevented and that FASD is a shared responsibility. The Centre submitted the following questions for inclusion in this survey: General FASD Knowledge 1. Have you heard of Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder or FASD before? 2. Can alcohol use during pregnancy cause FASD? 3. Do you think FASD can be prevented? 4. What is the best way to prevent FASD? a. No alcohol use in the first three months of pregnancy b. No alcohol use in the first six months of pregnancy c. No alcohol use in the last three months of pregnancy d. No alcohol use during pregnancy or while trying to become pregnant Contact with FASD 5. Do you know anyone who provides care for someone with FASD or who you think has FASD? 6. Do you know anyone who you think might have FASD? Support 7. Do you think a woman should be supported by others not to drink while pregnant? 8. Who should be involved in encouraging a woman not to drink alcohol during pregnancy; a. the woman's health care provider b. the woman's partner or spouse c. the woman's family d. the woman's friends e. the community f. the government Behaviour 9. If you saw a pregnant woman that you knew drinking alcohol, would you tell her that using alcohol during pregnancy might harm the baby? 10. If you saw a pregnant woman that you DID NOT know drinking alcohol, would you tell her that using alcohol during pregnancy might harm the baby? 8 The following definition of FASD was provided to survey participants who had not heard of FASD, did not respond or responded with ‘I don’t know’ to the question have you heard of FASD before? “FASD is completely preventable. It can occur in an individual whose mother drank alcohol during pregnancy. Alcohol use during pregnancy can lead to babies born with permanent disabilities. FASD can result in reduced IQ, speech and vision impairment, hyperactivity, behavior and learning problems, and physical malformations.” Descriptive statistics of responses to survey questions were calculated. Respondents were grouped according to various characteristics and compared to respondents in other groups. This was done to see if certain characteristics made respondents more or less likely to give a certain answer. Respondents were compared based on the following demographic characteristics: Gender (male vs. female) Age (various age-groups) Area of residence (Edmonton, Calgary vs. Other Alberta) Place of origin (Canadian born vs. Born outside Canada) Religious affiliation (those who self-identified as religious vs. those who did not) Highest Level of Education (completed high school or less vs. completed further education) Employment status (employed (full or part time) vs. unemployed/retired) Annual household income (high-income vs. low-income households) The number of participants who responded to particular question items varies. That is, not every participant answered every question item. Question item response percentages are calculated by dividing the number of respondents who indicated a specific response category divided by the total number of respondents who answered the question item. Demographics In a survey of this type, only part of the total population is surveyed. The information collected is then used to make inferences about the whole population. To ensure that the current survey is providing a reasonably reliable picture of the whole Albertan population, information describing the respondents to the survey should closely match data from the Canadian Census when the two are compared. Census data is collected from every unit in a population making it truly representative of the whole population. In the following section the current survey information is presented to show how comparable the respondents were to the Albertan population based on the most recent Canadian census (2006). Certain characteristics of respondents from the Alberta Survey were compared to Albertan population census information. Generally respondents had similar demographic characteristics to the general Albertan 9 population (see Appendix A). Therefore, the results of this report likely reflect the knowledge and attitudes of Albertans. Respondents’ Knowledge/Awareness about FASD General FASD Knowledge Survey respondents were asked 1) Have you heard of Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder or FASD before? Where respondents had not heard about FASD they were provided information regarding what FASD was and were not asked any further questions in the general FASD knowledge section. They were however, asked other FASD related questions later in the survey. Of the Albertan adults who participated in the survey, 85.7% (n=1028) were aware of what FASD is, where as 14.3% (n=172) had not heard of FASD (Figure 1). Figure 1. Have you heard of Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder or FASD before? Heard of FASD Not heard of FASD 14% 86% Characteristics of respondents who had not heard of FASD. Respondents who had not heard of FASD were different to respondents who had heard about FASD (Table 1). Compared to respondents who had heard about FASD, those who had not heard of FASD were more likely to be male (62.8%), to reside in Calgary (48%), to have been born outside Canada (47%), to be younger (aged between 18 and 44 years)(48%), to have children (42%), and to be nonCaucasian (36%). 10 Table 1. Characteristics of respondents who had heard of FASD compared to those who hadn’t heard of FASD. Characteristic Of those who had heard of Of those who had not heard of FASD (%) FASD (%) (N=1028) (N=172) Age 18-44 years 35.8 47.9 45 and older 64.2 52.1 Gender Male 47.9 62.8 Female 52.1 37.2 Ethnic background Caucasian 92.4 63.7 Non-Caucasian 7.6 36.2 Children Yes 34.5 42.4 No 65.5 57.6 Religion No Religion 27.6 20.6 Not Christian 6.8 18.1 Christian 65.6 61.2 Canadian Born Yes 86.1 52.9 No 13.9 47.1 The rest of this section focuses on the respondents who had heard about FASD (86%, n=1028) and their responses to the following general knowledge questions about FASD; 2) Can alcohol use during pregnancy cause FASD? 3) Do you think FASD can be prevented? 4) What is the best way to prevent FASD? a. No alcohol use in the first three months of pregnancy b. No alcohol use in the first six months of pregnancy c. No alcohol use in the last three months of pregnancy d. No alcohol use during pregnancy or while trying to become pregnant Of respondents who were aware of FASD, 99% knew that alcohol use during pregnancy causes FASD. The same percentage knew that FASD is preventable (99%). When asked the best way to prevent FASD, 96% of respondents who were aware of FASD selected the best answer, which was: no alcohol use during pregnancy or while trying to become pregnant, followed by 2.1% who selected ‘no alcohol used in the first 3 months of pregnancy, 0.9% who selected no alcohol use in the first 6 months of pregnancy and lastly 0.1% who selected no alcohol use in the last 3 months 11 of pregnancy (Figure 2). Respondents (4%) who did not select the best answer were predominantly male (62%). The 2.1% of respondents who selected the answer ‘no alcohol used in the first 3 months’ were mostly (67%) male. Figure 2. What is the best way to prevent FASD? 96.3 100 % of respondents 80 60 40 20 2.1 0.9 0.7 0 No alcohol use in the No alcohol use in the No alcohol use in the No alcohol use during first 3 months of first 6 months of last 3 months of pregnancy or while pregnancy pregnancy pregnancy trying to become pregnant Contact with FASD Both respondents who had heard of and not heard of FASD (n=1200) were asked the following questions. 5) Do you know anyone who you think might have Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder? 6) Do you know anyone who provides care for someone with FASD or who you think has FASD? Of the respondents that had heard of FASD, just over 40% reported knowing someone who has or they think might have FASD. Almost the same number of respondents knew someone who provided care for an individual who has or might have FASD (39.1%) (Figure 3). Of the respondents who had not heard of FASD, 6.5% reported knowing someone who has or they think might have FASD, and 7.1% reported knowing someone who cares for an individual who has or might have FASD (Figure 3). 12 Figure 3. Do you know anyone who you think might have Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD)? Do you know anyone who provides care for someone with FASD or who you think has FASD? Heard of FASD Not heard of FASD 50 % of respondents 40 40.1 39.1 30 20 10 7.1 6.5 0 Know someone with FASD Know anyone who cares for someone with FASD Responses from respondents who had heard about FASD were analyzed to see if there were differences in responses based on certain characteristic such as gender. Gender No gender differences were reported regarding whether respondents knew a person with FASD or not (p=0.19). Females were more likely to report knowing anyone who provided care to a person with FASD (45%) than males (32.6%) (Figure 4). Figure 4. Respondents who knew anyone who cared for someone with FASD by gender 50 45.0 % of respondents 40 32.6 30 20 10 0 Male Female Gender 13 Age Respondents in the age-groups 25-34 (45.0%) and 55-64 (46.2%) (Figure 5) were the most likely to know someone with FASD and to know anyone who cares for a person with FASD (45.8% and 44.2% respectively). Those aged 65+ were least likely to know anyone who has FASD (29.1%) and someone who cares for a person with FASD (24.8%) (Figure 5). Figure 5. Respondents who knew someone with FASD or who cared for a person with FASD by age 60 Know somoene with FASD Know anyone who cares for someone with FASD 50 40.0 % of respondents 46.2 45.0 45.8 39.3 40 40.7 44.2 41.0 40.1 34.8 29.1 30 24.8 20 10 0 18-24 25-34 45-54 35-44 Age in years 14 55-64 65+ Region of residence Fewer respondents in Calgary knew someone with FASD (32.2%) or anyone who cares for someone with FASD (32.2%) compared to respondents from Edmonton (41.6% and 41.4% respectively) and the rest of Alberta (42.8% and 45.8% respectively) (Figure 6). Figure 6.Respondents who knew someone with FASD or who cares for a person with FASD by region of residence Know somoene with FASD Know anyone who cares for someone with FASD 50 45.8 41.4 42.8 41.6 % of Respondents 40 32.2 32.2 30 20 10 0 Edmonton Calgary Other Alberta Area of residence Born in Canada Respondents born in Canada were more likely to know anyone who cared for someone with FASD 41% than respondents not born in Canada (27.3%). 15 Employment Respondents who were employed were more likely to know someone with FASD and someone who cares for a person with FASD (Figure 7). Figure 7. Respondents who knew someone with FASD or who cared for a person with FASD by employment status Know someone with FASD Know anyone who cares for someone with FASD 80 % of Respondents 60 42.4 42.9 40 32.8 35.1 20 0 Employed Not employed/retired Employment status Support All respondents (including those who had not heard of FASD (N=172)) were asked the following questions to gauge their views regarding support for pregnant women not to drink: 7) Do you think a woman should be supported by others not to drink while pregnant? 8) Who should be involved in encouraging a woman not to drink alcohol during pregnancy? a) The woman’s healthcare provider (e.g. Doctor) b) The woman's partner or spouse c) The woman's family d) The woman's friends 16 e) The community f) Government Most respondents believe that women should be supported by others not to drink while pregnant regardless of whether they had heard of FASD (98.6%) or not (95%). Among respondents who had heard about FASD, the woman’s family (95.5%) was identified as the main group to be involved in encouraging a woman not to drink alcohol during pregnancy. Partner/spouse (93.4%), friends (89.7%), and health care provider (88.2%) were also viewed the as a key resource in terms of supporting women not to drink during pregnancy. The community (77.2%) and government (70.8%) were also identified as important resources/supports, but not to the same extent as family (including partners or spouses), friends, or healthcare providers. Among respondents who had not heard of FASD (n=172), the pregnant woman’s partner/spouse (88%) and family (88%) were the two main sources of support selected, followed by health care provider (78%), friends (77%), government (62%), and community (60%) (Figure 8). Figure 8. Who should be involved in encouraging a woman not to drink alcohol during pregnancy? Heard of FASD 100 95.5 93.4 88.0 88.0 89.7 88.2 77.0 80 % of respondents Not heard of FASD 78.0 77.2 70.8 60.0 62.0 60 40 20 0 Partner/Spouse Woman's family Woman's friends Healthcare provider Community Government Support group Responses from respondents who had heard about FASD were analyzed to see if there were differences in responses based on certain characteristic such as gender. 17 Gender There were no significant differences by gender in respondents’ beliefs that the family and partner/spouse should be involved in encouraging a woman not to drink alcohol during pregnancy. Differences by gender existed for friends, health care providers, community, and government (Figure 9). More women than men believed that a pregnant woman’s health care providers (90.6% vs. 85.5%), the community (81% vs. 73%) and government (75.5% vs. 65.6%) should encourage a pregnant woman not to drink during pregnancy. While more men believed that a pregnant woman’s friends should encourage her not to drink during pregnancy. Figure 9. Who should support a pregnant woman not to drink alcohol during pregnancy by gender? Male 100 92.5 94.2 94.6 96.4 Female 98.2 91.9 90.6 85.5 81.0 % of Respondents 80 75.5 73.0 65.6 60 40 20 0 Partner/Spouse Woman's family Healthcare provider Support group Woman's friends Community Government Age Differences existed by age for the responses to the question of who should be involved in encouraging a woman not to drink alcohol during pregnancy. Respondents aged 25-34 had the highest percentage of individuals that believed the health care provider (95%), community (91%) and government (85%) should be involved (Figure 10). Comparably, respondents 65-years-old and over had the least percentage of individuals who felt this way: 81%, 64%, and 57% respectively. Within the age groups, the pattern of selection for who should be involved in encouraging pregnant women not to drink was similar; health providers were the most frequently selected, followed by community and then government. The exception was for young adults (ages 18-24) where respondents identified health care providers (89%), government (76%), and the community (70%). 18 Figure 10. Who should support a pregnant woman not to drink alcohol during pregnancy by age? Healthcare provider 100 89.1 % of Respondents 80 94.7 90.8 84.7 Community 89.787.4 89.2 77.7 76.1 69.6 77.9 73.7 Government 87.3 80.8 73.8 65.6 60 64.3 57.0 40 20 0 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Age-group (years) Employment status Employed respondents were more likely to report the importance of the various support groups than unemployed respondents. The biggest difference between employed and unemployed respondents is observed where the support group is the ‘community.’ More employed respondents (81.4%) viewed the community as an important support for pregnant women than unemployed respondents (70%) (Figure 11). 19 Figure 11. Who should support a pregnant woman not to drink alcohol during pregnancy by employment status? Employed 100 96.4 95.7 89.5 94.1 92.7 Unemployed 90.0 85.0 84.5 81.4 80 74.9 % of Respondents 70.0 63.8 60 40 20 0 Partner/Spouse Woman's family Woman's friends Healthcare provider Community Government Support group Behaviour All respondents (including those who had not heard about FASD) were asked the following questions: 9) If you saw a pregnant woman that you knew drinking alcohol, would you tell her that using alcohol during pregnancy might harm the baby? 10) If you saw a pregnant woman that you DID NOT know drinking alcohol, would you tell her that using alcohol during pregnancy might harm the baby? Among respondents who had heard about FASD, 89% said that if they saw a pregnant woman who they knew drinking alcohol, they would tell her that using alcohol during pregnancy might harm the baby. When it came to informing pregnant women who the respondents did not know, nearly half (49.7%) of the respondents would tell the woman of the potential harm to the baby. The findings among respondents who had not heard about FASD were similar, respondents indicated they would tell a woman who they knew (89%) and did not know (50%) that using alcohol during pregnancy might harm the baby. Responses from respondents who had heard about FASD were analyzed to see if there were differences in responses based on certain characteristics such as gender. 20 Gender Regarding whether respondents would tell a woman (who they knew) who was pregnant and drinking alcohol, about the potential harm to the baby, women were slightly more likely to do so than men (91% vs. 86.6%) (Figure 12). Where the respondents did not know the pregnant woman drinking, more females (54.7%) than males (44.5%) were likely to inform the pregnant woman of the potential harm to the baby. Figure 12.Respondents who would tell a pregnant woman drinking alcohol about the potential harm to the baby by gender Male Female 100 86.6 91.0 % of Respondents 80 60 54.7 44.5 40 20 0 Respondent knew the pregnant woman Respondent DID NOT know the pregnant woman Age The majority (over 80%) of respondents regardless of age would tell a pregnant woman (who they knew) who was drinking alcohol that using alcohol might harm the baby. Young adults (ages 18-24) were most likely to do so whether they knew the woman (100%) or not (66.7%), while respondents over 65 were least likely to do so (80.7% and 42.4% respectively) (Figure 13). 21 Figure 13. Respondents who would tell a pregnant woman drinking alcohol about the potential harm to the baby, by age Knew the pregnant woman DID NOT know the pregnant woman 100.0 100 94.4 91.0 89.6 89.1 80.7 80 % of Respondents 66.7 56.7 60 52.3 51.3 46.4 42.4 40 20 0 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Age-group (years) Region of residence Compared to individuals living in Calgary (40.3%), respondents from Edmonton (54.3%) and the rest of Alberta (53.7%) were somewhat more likely to tell a pregnant woman they did not know, who was drinking, that alcohol use may harm the baby (Figure 14). No other differences in beliefs or attitude towards FASD were seen by area of residence. Figure 14. Respondents who would tell a pregnant woman drinking alcohol about the potential harm to the baby, region of residence 60 54.3 53.7 % of Respondents 40.3 40 20 0 Edmonton Calgary Area of residence Income 22 Other Alberta Respondents earning less than $40,000 were the most likely to tell a pregnant woman they did not know that alcohol use might harm the baby (61.5%). (Figure 15) Figure 15. Respondents who would tell a pregnant woman who was drinking alcohol about the potential harm to the baby: differences by income 80 61.5 % of Respondents 60 49.2 46.9 40 20 0 <$39,999 $40,000-$79,999 >$80,000 Annual household income Religion Respondents with some religious background were more likely to tell a pregnant woman who was drinking alcohol that alcohol use may harm the baby, regardless of whether they knew the woman or not (Figure 16). No other differences by religion in responses to the FASD questions were observed. 23 Figure 16. Respondents who would tell a pregnant woman who was drinking alcohol about the potential harm to the baby; differences by religious background No religion 100 Belong to a religious group 90.8 86.1 % of Respondents 80 60 52.4 43.7 40 20 0 Respondent knew the pregnant woman Respondent DID NOT know the pregnant woman Discussion The current survey provides contemporary data on Albertans’ knowledge and attitudes about alcohol consumption in pregnancy, its effects on the fetus, and their understanding of FASD. In the survey, 85.7% of respondents had heard about FASD, this finding is consistent with the results of a 2006 Canadian nation-wide survey commissioned by the Public Health Agency of Canada3 where 86% of 3,633 respondents reported having heard of FASD. Additionally, as in the Public Health Agency of Canada study,3 the current study found that more women than men had heard of FASD. In the current survey, a disconcerting proportion of respondents had not heard of FASD (14.35%). Compared to the population of respondents who had heard about FASD, respondents who had not heard of FASD were more likely to be male, between 18 and 44 years of age, born outside of Canada, non-Caucasian and non-Christian. This shows population level gaps in FASD knowledge that exist within Alberta and provides information that is useful in the strategic planning process of FASD programs aimed at increasing awareness and education within the province. Of respondents who were aware of FASD, almost all (99%) knew that alcohol use during pregnancy causes FASD and that it can be prevented (99%). There was a slightly lower level of knowledge regarding alcohol consumption at different stages of pregnancy, with 4% of respondents unable to select the correct answer of ‘no alcohol use during pregnancy or while trying to become pregnant’. Over 40% of respondents in the study knew someone with or they suspected had FASD, and 39% of respondents knew someone who cared for an individual with or they suspected had FASD. Respondents 24 who knew someone with FASD were more likely to be between 55 and 64 years of age, employed and living outside of Calgary. Respondents, who knew anyone who cared for someone with FASD tended to be female, between 25 and 34 years of age, born in Canada, employed, and living outside of Calgary. Evidence shows that a woman’s ability to create an environment conducive to a healthy pregnancy, such as changing her alcohol use, is influenced by the availability and access to adequate supports and services, and underlying factors such as poverty and violence.4 A pregnant woman’s ability to make healthy choices can be influenced by the actions of her partners and family members. In the current study, 96% of respondents believed that women needed to be supported by others not to drink while pregnant. The respondents selection of main supporters to be involved in encouraging women not to drink during pregnancy were in the following order; family, partner, spouse, friends, health care provider, community, and government. Studies indicate that alcohol use can be influenced by social factors and the broader determinants of health including social norms and expectations.4,5 Multiple factors can influence alcohol use before and during pregnancy, including access to resources and social norms and expectations.4,5 In the current study, to gauge the acceptable social norms in relation to alcohol use during pregnancy, respondents were asked whether they would tell a pregnant woman using alcohol that alcohol might harm the baby. Where respondents knew the pregnant woman drinking alcohol they were more likely (89%) to tell the woman about the potential harm of alcohol to the baby, compared to those who did not know the pregnant woman (50%). Those least likely to tell a pregnant woman the potential harm to the baby were male, over 65 years old, residing in Calgary, earning more than $40,000 and non-religious. Limitations Limitations of the current study include: The survey was completed by telephone which may have led to under-representation of respondents who do not own a telephone, or those that have a cell phone and not a landline. The survey was completed in English and not conducted in other languages. Although the survey used random sampling, resulting variation in survey demographics may affect comparisons. 25 Recommendations 1. While the current study provided detailed information about FASD awareness among adults in Alberta, determining FASD awareness among those under age 18 is important. This would provide information to further inform prevention strategies that reduce the likelihood of an alcohol exposed pregnancy as well as normalize alcohol abstinence among those who may become pregnant. 2. Given the relatively high proportion of people who know someone with FASD and/or know someone who cared for an individual with FASD, there is an opportunity to better understand, through future surveys, if the needs of caregivers for information and support are being met. 3. The finding that all elements of society have a role to play in supporting alcohol abstinence during pregnancy suggests that Albertans recognize that collective efforts are required to support women at risk of an alcohol exposed pregnancy. This finding also suggests that health care providers, communities, and government should feel empowered to take a leading role in the implementation of effective, accessible, and respectful supports for women at risk. 4. The finding that many Albertans would be willing to discuss alcohol use during pregnancy with women they do not know may reflect the care and concern Albertans have for those in their communities. This finding is further evidence that policy and decision makers can be reassured that actions taken to support women would be valued by Albertans. 5. While those who responded to the survey represented the Alberta Census data with respect to education, employment, marital status, and ethnicity, there remains an opportunity to better understand alcohol awareness among women who may be most highly at risk, (past experience in child welfare, poor educational attainment, exposure to abuse or violence, underemployed, women of childbearing age not using birth control). 6. The finding that Albertans believe that government agencies, health care providers, and communities share responsibility for mitigating risk for FASD suggests that those working in agencies and programs where women may be at risk of drinking during pregnancy should be trained to identify these women and be able to provide supports or referrals. 7. Future surveys should be made accessible to a wider range of people, including those who do not speak English, and those who do not have a land line or a cell phone. 26 References 1. Ahmand N, Flight J, Singh VA, Poole N, Dell C. Canadian Addiction Survey (CAS): Focus on Gender Ottawa: Health Canada; 2008. 2. Sensible Guide to a Healthy Pregnancy: Government of Canada; 2011. 3. Thanh NX, Jonsson E. Drinking alcohol during pregnancy: Evidence from Canadian community health survey 2007/2008. Journal of Population Therapeutics and Clinical Pharmacology. 2010;17(2):e302e307. 4. Thanh N, Jonsson E. Costs of fetal alcohol spectrum disorder in Alberta, Canada. Canadian Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 2009;16:80-90. 5. Stade B, Ali A, Bennett D, et al. The burden of prenatal exposure to alcohol: Revised measurement of cost. The Canadian Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 2009;16(1):e91-e102. 6. Stratton K, Howe C, Battaglia F, eds. Fetal Alcohol Syndome: Diagnosis, Epidemiology, Prevention, and Treatment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1996. 7. Environics Research Group. Alcohol use during pregnancy and awareness of fetal alcohol syndrome and fetal alcohol spectrum disorder: Results of a national survey Toronto: Public Health Agency of Canada; 2006. 8. Burgoyne W, Best Start Resource Centre. What we have learned: Key Canadian FASD awareness campaigns. Canada: Public Health Agency of Canada;2005. 9. Roberts G, Nanson J. Best practices: Fetal Alcohol Syndrome/Fetal alcohol effects and the effects of other substance use during pregnancy. Ottawa: Health Canada; 2000: http://www.phacaspc.gc.ca/hp-ps/dca-dea/publications/pdf/03-bestpractices_e.pdf. 27 Appendix A: Characteristics of Survey Respondents Table A1: Characteristics of survey respondents (n=1203) compared to 2006 Census information. Census information Number of for the Albertan Survey respondents characteristics survey % Population respondents ( %) Highest educational attainment Less than high school 99 8.2 - High school completed 223 26.7 24.1 Post-secondary 881 73.2 - Employed (Full or part-time) 752 66.0 70.9 Retired 235 20.0 - Other (Unemployed, maternity, students, disabled) 131 14.0 - Married or in a common-law relationship 829 69.1 65.0 Single, divorced, separated or widowed 371 30.9 - Caucasian 1047 88.3 - Non-Caucasian 139 11.7 13.9 Canada 979 81.4 - Other 224 18.6 16.2. No religion 300 26.5 24.0 Christian 734 65.0 71.0 Other 96 8.5 - Employment Marital status Ethnicity Country of Birth Religion Characteristics of Survey Respondents This survey had 1203 Albertans that participated. Respondents were eligible to participate if they were over 18 years of age and resided in Alberta. Households were selected by random-digit dialing and respondents were selected by gender to ensure equal representation of males and females. 28 Approximately one third of respondents lived in Metropolitan Calgary, one-third in Metropolitan Edmonton and one-third in the rest of Alberta; about half of respondents were male. In the current study 26.7% respondents had completed high school; this is comparable to the 2006 census finding that 24.1% of Albertans had a high school certificate or equivalent. Most respondents were employed (66.4%) – either full-time (52%) or part-time (14.4%) which is consistent with the Census finding that 70.9% of adults aged 15 and older are employed. Just over 69.1% of respondents were married or in a common-law relationship and 30.9% were single, divorced, separated or widowed. This is comparable to the 2006 Census finding that 65% of Albertans over the age of 20 were married or in a common-law relationship. About 11.7% of respondents were non-Caucasian, which is comparable to the Census report that 13.9% of Albertans were non-Caucasian. Non-Caucasian respondents in this sample were a diverse group that consisted of individuals who self-identified as Aboriginal, Asian, Latin American, and Black. About 18.6% of respondents were born outside of Canada. This is consistent with the Census report that 16.2% of Albertans were foreign-born. About 26.5% respondents reported bring non-religious and just over 65% were Christian. This is close to the most current Census religion statistics (2001) that almost 24% of Albertan residents identify with no religion and that about 71% identify as Christian. 29 Appendix B: About the Centre About the Alberta Centre for Child, Family, and Community Research The Alberta Centre for Child, Family and Community Research is a public-sector, innovative resource for evidence. The Centre develops, supports and integrates research across sectors and disciplines to provide a strong, evidence-based foundation for identifying and promoting effective public policy and service delivery to improve the well-being of children, families and communities in Alberta, Canada, and internationally. Vision Improve the well-being of children, their families and communities in Alberta, Canada and internationally, by mobilizing evidence into policy and practice. Mission Collaboratively develop, support and integrate evidence across sectors and disciplines to provide a strong foundation for identifying and promoting effective public policy and service delivery to improve the well-being of children, families, and communities. The Centre has six key areas of focus: Developing a policy-relevant research agenda Funding unique research driven by and meeting the needs of policy makers, while providing current knowledge to fill in gaps Gathering, analyzing and disseminating relevant and emerging national and international research that is of relevance to Alberta’s child well-being agenda Mobilizing evidence into policy and practice Building transdisciplinary and cross-sectoral research capacity Analyzing government administrative data to inform policy through the Child and Youth Data Laboratory The Centre works in conjunction with Alberta Children and Youth Services, eight other Alberta childserving ministries, the Government of Canada and numerous other partners and collaborators to improve the well-being of children by: Identifying the needs for evidence; Supporting high priority initiatives of Children and Youth Services and the Government of Alberta; Supporting research capacity building; Providing direction to leading edge research initiatives; and Developing an extensive network of collaborative partnerships. 30 The Centre also manages The Child and Youth Data Laboratory (CYDL) Initiative that analyses linked data from nine ministries to provide a comprehensive profile of the trajectories and outcomes children and youth experience as they access multiple programs across several provincial government programs. For more information, please visit www.research4children.com Networks engaged with community partners to learn and report on gaps in service, and network leadership teams conducted strategic planning to enhance existing services and develop new services. In addition, a SharePoint Site and protocol was developed and implemented by the networks (Communication Working Group) to facilitate and improve inter-network communication. 31