CONNOR
What about pankakes?
*pancakes
MARCUS
THERE ARE PANCAKES IN THIS WORLD.
SOME ARE MADE IN PANS
CONNOR
:0
MARCUS
THAT'S WHY THEY ARE CALLED...
CONNOR
THERE ARE
MARCUS
PANCAKES
NOW!
CONNOR
CAKEPANS
WHAT
MARCUS
WHEN A PANCAKE IS MADE IN AN INSTANT PANCAKE MAKER THING...
THERE IS NO PAN.
CONNOR
YES
MARCUS
SO IT IS AN INSTCAKE
CONNOR
BUT THERE IS A SPOON
SO IT'S A SPOONCAKE
MARCUS
SO IT IS SPOONCAKES.
CONNOR
A SPAKE
MARCUS
I CAN BACK THIS.
CONNOR
YES
INVEST NOW
MARCUS
AAAAAAAAAAAAH MY GAWD WE ARE PHILOSIPHERS TO MAX
CONNOR
THERE IS NO PHILOSOPHY
BECAUSE THAT IMPLIES THAT THINGS THAT ARE SIMPLY CREATED
WITHIN THE MINDS OF HUMANS CAN EXIST
MARCUS
AAAAAAH
CONNOR
IF THAT WERE TRUE, THEN EVERYTHING WOULD EXIST
WHICH IT DOESN'T
PROBABLY
MARCUS
BUT DOESN'T IT?
CONNOR
BUT IF EVERYTHING EXISTS, THEN NOTHING DOES
SO PHILOSOPHY DOESN'T EXIST
I AM ON TO SOMETHING
PLATO WAS PLAYING WITH PLAY-DOH
BECAUSE HE SURE WASN'T PLAYING WITH PHILOSOPHY.
MARCUS
WHAT IF, AT SOME POINT IN SOME DIMENTION, EVERYTHING WILL EXIST
AT ONCE- WHICH THEREFORE DEFINES THAT THERE IS A DIMENSION THAT NO
PARALLEL DIMENSIONS EXIST. THEREFORE, NO DIMENSION EXISTS, DUE TO THE
FACT THAT THERE IS A DIMENSION WHERE AS NO OTHER DIMENSION EXISTS.
CONNOR
AH, BUT THAT IMPLIES THAT THERE IS SUCH A DIMENSION, WHICH
IMPLIES THAT THERE ARE DIMENSIONS THAT ARE NOT GOVERNED BY THE
SAME LAWS AS OTHER DIMENSIONS
WHICH MEANS THEY COULD NOT EXIST SIMULTANEOUSLY
MARCUS
OF COURSE, THAT COULD ALSO MEAN THAT ANY DIMENSION ENTIRELY
EXISTS SEPERATELY, AND THEREFORE HAS NO EFFECT ON THE OTHER!
BUT, IF WE SITE ARITICLE A, BIOSHOCK INFINITE, WE WILL FIND ELIZABETH
WAS ABLE TO FIND BONDS BEEEEETWEEN EVERY DIMENSION- THOUGH NOT
COMBINED, ALL DIMENSIONS ARE INTERTWINED- ONE CANNOT EXIST WITHOUT
THE OTHERR.
CONNOR
EXACTLY. AND, CITING THE SAME ARTICLE, WE KNOW THAT THERE ARE
CONSTANTS AND VARIABLES; THINGS WITHIN SOME DIMENSIONS THAT MUST
STAY THE SAME, WHILE OTHERS CAN CHANGE. THESE THINGS HAVE TO STAY
THE SAME TO KEEP THE INTERTWINED EFFECT
MARCUS
PRECISELY! NOW, SINCE THERE IS DIMENSION WHERE OTHER DIMENSIONS
ARE NOT INTERTWINED, AS EINSTEENS LAW OF INFINITE PROBABILITY
DICTATES, WE CAN LEARN THAT THERE MUST BE ONE FREESTANDING
DIMENSION, WHICH WOULD COLLAPSE DUE TO LACK OF SUPPORT. BUT! THE
THING TO REMEMBER IS THAT ALL DIMENSIONS ARE CONNECTED, AND THE
DESTRUCTION OF THIS UNIVERSE WOULD MERELY CREATE ANOTHER UNIVERSE
WITH THE SAME RULES, ONLY TO BE DESTROYED. EVENTUALLY INFINITY
UNIVERSES HAVE BEEN REDUCED TO DUST, WHICH WOULD INCLUDE OURS.
CONNOR
Well crap.
I guess you can't argue with Einsteen,
MARCUS
IN WHICH CASE WE ARE ALL ACTUALLY DEAD, AND HAVE NEVER
EXISTED.
THEREFORE YOU ARE CORRECT, AS PHILOSOPHY DOES NOT EXIST
UNLESS A CONCEPT CAN EXIST WITHOUT IT EVER BEING THOUGHT OF.
CONNOR
BUT IF NOTHING EXISTS, THEN NOTHING CAN'T NOT EXIST, AS NOTHING IS
THERE TO OBSERVE THE LACK OF ITS EXISTENCE.
MARCUS
SO DOES THAT MEAN PHILOSOPHY IS A CONCEPT CREATED AND
SUSTAINED BY NOTHINGNESS.
CONNOR
THEREFORE, EXISTENCE, OR LACK THEREOF, IS IRRELEVANT.
NO. BECAUSE NOTHINGNESS IS THE ABSENCE OF CONCEPTS. HOWEVER,
TRUE NOTHINGNESS IS IMPOSSIBLE, AS NOTHINGNESS ITSELF IS SOMETHING. IT
HAS A DEFINITION AND A NAME.
MARCUS
AND THEREFORE, WHEN ANYTHING EXISTS, IT IS ONE DAY BOUND TO
SEEK GREATER KNOWLEDGE, CREATING PHILOSOPHY. IF A UNIVERSE DOES NOT
EXIST, THE NOTHINGNESS WILL CREATE PHILOSOPHY, DESTROYING ITSELF IN
THE PROCESS.
LIKE A MOTH ATTRACTED TO A FLAME.
CONNOR
BUT IF NOTHINGNESS EXISTS, IT CANNOT BE DESTROYED.
BECAUSE IF IT WERE DESTROYED, THEN THAT WOULD BE NOTHINGNESS.
BASICALLY, THINGS HAVE TO EXIST BECAUSE THEY HAVE TO EXIST.
MARCUS
EXCEPT WHEN THE NOTHINGNESS IS REPLACED BY SOMETHING, WHICH IT
DOES TO ITSELF. SO THE REASON NOTHINGNESS IS NOTHING IS BECAUSE IT'S
MERE EXISTENCE DESTROYS ITSELF.
CONNOR
YES. BUT IF ITS MERE EXISTENCE DESTROYS ITSELF, IT CAN NEVER EXIST
IN THE FIRST PLACE, BECAUSE TO EXIST IT WOULD HAVE TO DESTROY ITSELF.
MARCUS
PRECISELY. AND THEREFORE, NOTHINGNESS ALWAYS EXISTS, BECAUSE IT
CAN NEVER CREATE ITSELF.
CONNOR
HALF LIFE 3 CONFIRMED
MARCUS
OOOOOOOOOOOOH MY GAWD
CONNOR
ALSO, THE EXISTENCE OF NOTHINGNESS IMPLIES THAT NOTHINGNESS IS
SOMETHING.
MARCUS
WHICH ELIMINATES NOTHINGNESS
CONNOR
WHICH CREATES NOTHINGNESS
MARCUS
AND DESTROYS ITSELF SIMILTANIOUSLY.
CONNOR
WHICH MEANS...
What does that mean?
MARCUS
THAT LIFE IS DEATH, AND DEATH IS LIFE.
IT'S THE CIIIIIIIRCLE OF LIIIIIIIIFE
AND IT MOOOOOVES US AAAAAAAAAAALL
CONNOR
No, seriously. I'm intrigued now. What does that mean?
MARCUS
This is a really good philosophical debate, to be honest. We got deep today.
CONNOR
Yeah. That's why I'm getting serious now. I'm seriously pondering this.
This implies that existence itself is a paradox.
As is the lack thereof.
Which means that something can't exist, but nothing can't exist.
MARCUS
So, let's recap.
We need a philosophical debate youtube channel.
CONNOR
We do.