Regulations on OSKE the Therapeutic stomatology
Annex to the Regulation on Ranking
At the Department of Therapeutic Dental students 5 courses in the final semester kontse10 rent
control method OSCE.
Method OSCE held at 8 stations, including 2-station station and theoretical:
The station number 2 "X - ray diagnosis", Station number 5 "Recipes"
2 stations and analytical:
The station number 6 "Case Studies", Station number 8 "Slides"
4 Station practical:
Station number 1 "Supervision of patients'
The station number 7 "Modern Medical Technology"
Station number 3 "Manual skills on how to diagnosis "
Station number 4 "Manual skills on the methods of treatment "
2 stations shadow:
The station number 5 "Recipes", Station number 6 "Case Studies"
Each station is evaluated according to the criteria set out in the "Regulations on the rating '100
Ball noy e systems, developed by the department.
During the final control method OSCE in the room should be quiet, order, and discipline.
On the final control method OSCE allowed students receive not less than
55% of the maximum score. Time at each station is given by s 3 minutes. Switching to another
station with a beep.
Station number 1, "Curation of patients'
Purpose: The student spends lens Visual examination the patient, to methods of examination to
differential diagnosis, make a preliminary and a final diagnosis, to know the treatment plan.
The station number 2 "X - ray diagnostics"
Purpose: A student must determine the x-ray image jaw, dental formula to determine the status
of the alveolar bone, and a compact disc.
Station number 3 "Manual skills on how to diagnosis "
Purpose: The student must spend on phantoms basic and advanced methods of research of
diseases of the oral mucosa through the steps to perform practical skills.
Station number 4 "manual skills on how to treat"
Objective: The student should spend on phantoms treatment of diseases of the oral mucosa
through the steps to perform practical skills.
The station number 5 "Recipes"
Goal : The student must write the correct prescription and assign the patient.
The station number 6 "Case Studies"
Purpose: The student must solve situational problems correctly.
The station number 7, "Modern Medical Technology"
Objective: The student should be able to choose the advanced technologies and materials tools to
know their use.
The station number 8 "Slides"
Purpose: A student at the slides on the basis of objective data and morphological Sanchez to their
element s, to determine at which the disease can occur that element and a preliminary diagnosis.
At each station there are options of 25 questions and developed answers to these
questions. Practical skills are conducted on models and phantoms.
Warden Training Group extends option of questions and it is this version of the questions are
answered the students in this group stations OSCE. Beep indicates the start of the final control is
declared the students and the students take their seats at the end of time the alarm sounds again,
after which students are transplanted. The student card is encrypted OSCE and blank paper with
a stamp. At each station after answering the teacher evaluates the student's answer, put the
estimate at stake OSCE puts his signature. Students must answer all questions 8
stations (Station number 5 "Recipes", Station number 6 "Case Studies" shadow, the answer is written).
Evaluation is carried out on 100 Ball systems is All 8 station equilibrium, if a student at one
station receives a failing grade,
it is believed that the student fails OSCE, that is, he received a failing grade on the OSCE,
according to the order the student is allowed to go around the final control on the OSCE.
Criteria for assessing the knowledge and skills of final control method OSCE students 5 course and at the
Department of cal and therapeutic dental the Hospital dental therapeutics (Oral mucosa
pathology)” therapeutically Sanchez to th Dentistry
Number
The%
Evaluation
The degree of knowledge of the student
1
96-100%
Excellent "5"
2
91-95%
Excellent "5"
3
86-90%
Excellent "5"
4
81-85%
Good "4"
5
76-80%
Good "4"
6
71-75%
Well
"4"
The answer to the questions correct and complete.
Answer above curriculum requirements, knows and uses
additional literature, with a creative approach to draw
conclusions can take
solutions., to think creatively, to make
conclusions.Independently analyze the question,
answers carefully.
Situational problem is solved at a high level. task
analyzes at a high level. Practical skills are executed
completely and fully.
Full response. The answer above curriculum
requirements, knows and uses additional literature, with
a creative approach. Maybe draw conclusions can
decide., To think creatively, to make
conclusions. Independently analyze the issue, situational
problem is solved at a high level. task analyzes at a high
level. practical skills fully implemented.
Complete answer, but allows 1-2 errors in the response.
Their answers can be applied in practice, with the
matter, the concept has independently analyzed the
issue.Situational problem is solved in the right direction.
Practical skills are OK.
Answers to the questions completely ticket admits 2-3 errors
in the response. Their answers can be applied in practice,
with the matter, the concept has Independently analyze
the issue. Situational problem is solved correctly, active ..
Who knows, can tell a concept. Practical skills are made with
small flaws.
Answers to this question are incomplete. The student knows
the subject, but can not completely relate .. He knows the
subject matter, is responsible, has a concept. Independently
analyzes the question.
In practice it may apply, understand, can tell, a
concept.Situational problem is solved not completely.
Practical skills are made with small flaws, has 2-3 errors.
The student has learned a topic answers the question
correctly, but not completely. Knows the subject matter,
is responsible, has a concept.
The answer is quite correct. Case study solved correctly,
7
66-70%
Satisfactory
3
8
61-65%
Satisfactory
3
9
55-60%
satisfactory
3
10
50-54%
unsatisfactory
2
11
46-49%
unsatisfactory 2
12
41-45%
unsatisfactory 2
13
36-40%
unsatisfactory 2
14
31-35%
unsatisfactory 2
but can not justify. Practical skills are not fully satisfied,
does no more than 4 errors.
The answers are not complete.
Case study is not completely solved, with 3 or more
errors. Practical skills are made with flaws and errors.
The answers are not complete, with errors. Understand
the issue, knows, you might say. Has the concept. Has
no understanding of the topic. Situational problem is
solved correctly. No justification. Practical skills are
made with flaws and errors.
The answers are not complete, with errors. Understand
the issue, knows, you might say. Has the concept. Has
no understanding of the topic. Case study is not
resolved correctly. Practical skills are made with flaws
and errors.
The answer is only 1/3 are not fully and correctly.
Student does not know the subject, situational problem
is not solved. Practical skills are made with flaws and
errors.
The answer is only ¼ of not fully and correctly. Student
does not know the subject, situational problem is not
solved., No idea. Practical skills are made with flaws
and errors.
The answers are not complete, with errors. Situational
problem is not solved. No idea. Practical skills are not
met.
Do not know the subject, confused answers. situational
problem is not solved. Practical skills are not met ..
Can not answer a question, do not know. Knoweth not
the issue. Situational problem is not solved. Practical
skills are not met
MAP
OSCE to monitor the outcome for the 5th year students at the Hospital dental
therapeutics (Oral mucosa pathology)” Department of Dentistry, Tashkent Medical
Academy
Cipher student group ___________________________________
Date проведения______________________________________
Replies in points at stations
Number Name of station
Maxim.Point Ticket Point Responsible
number
1.
Curation of patients
100
Assoc. Hasanov LE
2.
X-ray diagnostics
100
Ass. Dadamova AD
3.
Practical skills on how
to diagnose diseases of
100
Ass. Navruzova FR
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
hard tissues of the
teeth, periodontal and
oral mucosa
Practical skills in
treatments for diseases
of hard tissues of the
teeth, periodontal and
oral mucosa
Recipes
Case Studies
Modern medical
technology
Slides
100
Ass. Yusupalihodzhaeva
SH
100
100
Assoc. Ibragimova M.KH.
Dots.Hasanova LE
100
Assoc. Melkumyan TV
100
Ass. Shukurova WA
Total score ________________
Signature studenta_________________
Head of Department of Dentistry
prof. Kamilov JP
EVALUATION CRITERIA I knowledge and skills at the station "skills for treatments for
diseases of hard tissues of the teeth, periodontal and oral mucosa "5th year students and
dental faculty for the final control methodOSCE on Hospital dental therapeutics (Oral mucosa
pathology)” at the Department of therapeutic Sanchez to second and dentists
Number
Indicators%
Evaluation
The degree of knowledge of the
student
1
96-100%
Excellent "5"
Practical skills are performed
independently at a high level
2
91-95%
Excellent "5"
Practical skills are fully implemented.
3
86-90%
Excellent "5"
Practical skills are fully implemented,
with only the help of a teacher.
4
81-85%
Good "4"
Practical skills are fully implemented,
with a few flaws.
5
76-80%
Good "4"
Practical skills are not fully satisfied,
with 2-3 errors
6
71-75%
Well
Practical skills are not fully satisfied,
"4"
with 4 and more errors.
Satisfactory
7
66-70%
In performing skills are errors and
shortcomings.
3
8
61-65%
Satisfactory
In performing skills are errors and
shortcomings.
3
9
55-60%
satisfactory
In performing skills are errors and
shortcomings.
3
10
50-54%
unsatisfactory
In performing skills are errors and
omissions ..
2
11
46-49%
Unsatisfactory
In performing skills are errors and
shortcomings.
2
12
41-45%
Unsatisfactory
Practical skills are not learned, are not
met.
2
13
36-40%
Unsatisfactory
Practical skills are not met ..
2
14
31-35%
unsatisfactory
2
Practical skills are not met ..
The criteria for assessment of knowledge and skills at the station "skills for diagnostic
procedures for diseases of hard tissues of the teeth, periodontal and oral
mucosa "5th year students and dental faculty for the final control method OSCE on Hospital dental
therapeutics (Oral mucosa pathology)” at the Department of therapeutic Sanchez to second and
dentists
Number
component%
Evaluation
The degree of knowledge of the student
1
96-100%
Excellent "5"
2
91-95%
Excellent "5"
Practical skills are performed independently
at a high level
Practical skills are fully implemented.
3
86-90%
Excellent "5"
4
81-85%
Good "4"
5
76-80%
Good "4"
6
71-75%
Well
"4"
7
66-70%
Satisfactory
Practical skills are fully implemented, with
only the help of a teacher.
Practical skills are fully implemented, with
a few flaws.
Practical skills are not fully satisfied, with
2-3 errors
Practical skills are not fully satisfied, with 4
and more errors.
In performing skills are errors and
shortcomings.
3
8
61-65%
satisfactory
In performing skills are errors and
shortcomings.
3
9
55-60%
Satisfactory
In performing skills are errors and
shortcomings.
3
10
50-54%
unsatisfactory
In performing skills are errors and
omissions.
2
11
46-49%
unsatisfactory
In performing skills are errors and
shortcomings.
2
12
41-45%
unsatisfactory
Practical skills are not learned, is not to be
implemented.
2
13
36-40%
Unsatisfactory
Practical skills are not met ..
2
14
31-35%
unsatisfactory
2
Practical skills are not met ..
The criteria for assessment of knowledge and skills at the station "Case Studies" 5
year students and dental faculty for the final control method OSCE on Hospital dental therapeutics
(Oral mucosa pathology)” at the Department of therapeutic Sanchez to second and dentists
Number
component%
Evaluation
1
96-100%
Excellent "5"
2
91-95%
Excellent "5"
3
86-90%
Excellent "5"
4
81-85%
Good "4"
5
76 - 80%
Good "4"
6
71-75%
Well
"4"
7
66-70%
Satisfactory
The degree of knowledge of the
student
Situational problems are solved at the
highest level. Analyzes problems.
Situational problems are solved at the
highest level, making the right
conclusions. Analyzes problems
Case study solves in the right direction,
with a few flaws.
Actively involved in solving situational
problems in the right direction.
Case study does not fully solve.
Case study does not fully solve,
no more than 3 errors.
Case study is correct, can not be
justified.
3
8
61-65%
Satisfactory
Case study is not resolved. The answer
is not justified.
3
9
55-60%
Satisfactory
Case study echilgan solved.
3
10
50-54%
Unsatisfactory
2
11
46-49%
Unsatisfactory
2
12
41-45%
Unsatisfactory
On the third question the answer is not
completely and correctly. Student does
not know the subject.
On the fourth question the answer is
not completely and correctly. Student
does not know the subject.
On the fifth question situational
problem answers are wrong.
2
13
36-40%
Unsatisfactory
On the tenth questions answers are
wrong.
2
14
31-35%
unsatisfactory
2
No answer to solve situational
problems.
The criteria for assessment of knowledge and skills at the station "Slides" 5
year students and dental faculty for the final control method OSCE on Hospital dental therapeutics
(Oral mucosa pathology)” at the Department of therapeutic Sanchez to second and dentists
Number
The%
Evaluation
The degree of knowledge of the student
1
96-100%
Excellent "5"
2
91-95%
Excellent "5"
3
86-90%
Excellent "5"
4
81-85%
Good "about 4"
5
76 - 80%
Good "4"
6
71-75%
Well
"4"
7
66-70%
Satisfactory
3
8
61-65%
Satisfactory
3
9
55-60%
Satisfactory
3
10
50-54%
unsatisfactory
The answer to the question is complete and correct
at the highest level, with a creative approach, above
the requirements of the program Uses knowledge of
primary and secondary literature independently
analyzes and making the right conclusions.
The answer to the question of full, high, above the
requirements of the program. Uses knowledge of
primary and secondary literature, independently
analyzes and making the right conclusions.
The answer to the question is full, allow 1-2 errors.
Independently analyzes and making the right
conclusions.
The answer to the question is full, allow 2-3
errors. May by to practice, understand the essence,
has an idea.
The answer is not complete. The student knows the
subject, but it can not open properly. Understands
the nature, has an idea.
The answer is correct but not complete. Student
learned subject, do not give a complete answer.
Understands the nature, has an idea
quite the right answer.
The answer to the question posed half.
The student has learned the theme, but does not
give a complete answer, some questions are
answered.
The answer to the question posed is not half full and
with errors. According to some, the notion of topic
areas and poor judgment.
The answer to the question posed half do not
complete with errors. In some areas, the notion of
theme and misjudgment.
The answer to the third question is not complete
with errors. The student does not know the subject.
2
11
46-49%
unsatisfactory
The answer to ¼ the question is not complete, with
errors The student does not know the subject.
2
12
41-45%
unsatisfactory
The answer to the fifth question is not complete and
is invalid.
2
13
36-40%
unsatisfactory
The answer to the tenth question wrong. Theme
does not know the answers confusing ..
2
14
31-35%
Unsatisfactory
No answer to the question, the subject does not
know.
2
The criteria for assessment of knowledge and skills at the station "Curation patients' 5th
year students and dental faculty for the final control method OSCE on Hospital dental therapeutics
(Oral mucosa pathology)” at the Department of therapeutic Sanchez to second and dentists
Number
component%
Evaluation
The degree of knowledge of the student
1
96-100%
Excellent "5"
2
91-95%
Excellent "5"
3
86-90%
Excellent "5"
4
81-85%
Good "4"
5
76-80%
Good "4"
6
71-75%
Well
"4"
7
66-70%
Satisfactory
The answer to the questions and correct the
above program requirements, with additional
literature, with a creative approach.
Independently analyze, think creatively, to
make the right conclusions.
The answer is full, the above requirements of the
program, with additional literature, with a creative
approach. Independently analyze, think creatively,
to make the right conclusions.
The answer to the question is full, but the 1-2
errors.Own analyzes
Complete response, with 2-3 errors. Answers can
be applied in practice, with the matter, has an idea.
The answer is not complete. Student knows the
subject, but has not been fully understood.
Understand the issue is the concept.
Correct, but not polnyy.Student have svoil, but the
answer is not completely mud. Understand the issue
enough answers correctly, has an idea.
The answer to half the questions posed.
The student knows the subject, but does not answer
the question fully, some of them knew the answer.
3
8
61-65%
Satisfactory
3
9
55-60%
Satisfactory
3
10
50-54%
unsatisfactory
2
The answer to half the questions posed.
Responsible not completely in error. Has a
representation in some areas of the topic. Has the
concept.
A half issues.
Responsible not completely in error. Has a
representation in some areas of the topic. Has a
fuzzy concept.
The answer to the third question, part-time, with
errors. Student does not know the topic.
11
46-49%
Unsatisfactory
The answer to Fourth question, part-time, with
errors. Student theme does not know.
2
12
41-45%
unsatisfactory
2
13
36-40%
unsatisfactory
The answer to the fifth question. Student does not
know the topic. Answer is not complete and is
invalid.
Reply tenth question wrong. Theme knows
confused. Theme is not learned ..
2
14
31-35%
unsatisfactory
The answer is no, absolutely not know the topic.
2
The criteria for assessment of knowledge and skills at the station "Recipes" 5
year students and dental faculty for the final control method OSCE on Hospital dental therapeutics
(Oral mucosa pathology)” at the Department of therapeutic Sanchez to second and dentists
Number
component%
Evaluation
The degree of knowledge of the student
1
96-100%
Excellent "5"
2
91-95%
Excellent "5"
3
86-90%
Excellent "5"
4
81-85%
Good "4"
5
76-80%
Good "4"
6
71-75%
well
"4"
7
66-70%
satisfactory
Recipe written completely and correctly.
Response to the above requirements of the
program, with a creative approach,
additional literature knows. Independently
analyzes the question with a creative
approach, making conclusions.
The recipe is correct and complete. Answer
the above requirements of the program,
with a creative approach, additional
literature knows. Independently analyzes
the issue, with a creative approach.
Recipe written in full, with 1-2 errors.
Independently analyzes the question.
Complete answer, 2-3 errors. Recipe can
be applied in practice, with the matter, has
the concept.
The answer is incomplete. With the matter,
has the concept.
The recipe is written correctly, but not
completely. Understands the essence of the
issue is the concept., Not adequately
responding.
A half issues.
The student knows the subject, but there is
an error in the recipe.
3
8
61-65%
Satisfactory
A half issues.
The recipe is not written completely, there
are errors. Has no clear idea about some of
3
9
55-60%
the ways the theme ..
satisfactory
The recipe is written correctly by only ½,
there are shortcomings and mistakes.
3
10
50-54%
unsatisfactory
The recipe is written correctly only on the
third, there are errors.
2
11
46-49%
unsatisfactory
The recipe is written correctly by only
¼,the answer is incomplete, with errors.
2
12
41-45%
Unsatisfactory
Recipe is written correctly by only
1/5,incomplete, with errors.
2
13
36-40%
unsatisfactory
Recipe written correctly by only 1/10 parttime, with errors.
2
14
31-35%
Unsatisfactory
There is no answer, the student is not
aware topic ..
2
The criteria for assessment of knowledge and skills at the station "Modern medical
technology" 5th year students and dental faculty for the final control method OSCE on Hospital
dental therapeutics (Oral mucosa pathology)” at the Department of therapeutic Sanchez to
second and dentists
Number
component%
Evaluation
The degree of knowledge of the student
1
96-100%
Excellent "5"
2
91-95%
Excellent "5"
3
86-90%
Excellent "5"
4
81-85%
Good "4"
He knows modern medical technology, can
choose and use.
He knows modern medical technology, can
choose and use.
He knows modern medical technology, can
select and use part.
He knows modern medical technology, but
allows 1-2 shortcomings in the selection.
5
76-80%
Good "4"
6
71-75%
Well
"4"
7
66-70%
Satisfactory
3
Knows modern medical technology, but
not at a high level.
Knows modern medical technology at a
good level.
Has disadvantages in choosing modern
medical technology, to show how to use
can not.
8
61-65%
satisfactory
3
9
55-60%
Satisfactory
Has disadvantages in choosing modern
medical technology, to show how to use
can not.
The question is not open, modern medical
technology know enough, can not choose.
3
10
50-54%
Unsatisfactory
With TERM medical technology knows
enough tools can not show.
2
11
46-49%
unsatisfactory
2
12
41-45%
Unsatisfactory
The answer to the fourth question has
errorsThere is no concept of C-TERM
medical technology does not know.
The answer to the fifth question. C-TERM
medical technology does not know
2
13
36-40%
Unsatisfactory
2
14
31-35%
unsatisfactory
The answer to the tenth question. No
concept of a medical technology TERM
knows.
The student is not known since TERM
medical technology, he has no idea.
2
The criteria for assessment of knowledge and skills at the station "X-ray diagnostics" 5
year students and dental faculty for the final control method OSCE on Hospital dental therapeutics
(Oral mucosa pathology)” at the Department of therapeutic Sanchez to second and dentists
Number
component%
Evaluation
The degree of knowledge of the student
1
96-100%
Excellent "5"
2
91-95%
Excellent "5"
3
86-90%
Excellent "5"
4
81-85%
Good "4"
Complete and correct answer. Correctly
pointed jaw and tooth number.
Independently analyzes the question is
creative, able to draw
conclusions. Correctly diagnoses.
The answer to the question is correct.
Correctly pointed jaw and tooth
number. Independently analyzes the
question is creative, able to draw
conclusions. Correctly diagnoses.
The answer to the question with 1-2 errors.
Correctly pointed jaw and tooth
number.Independently analyze the
question, is able to draw
conclusions. Correctly diagnoses.
Complete answer, but admitted mistakes 23. Correctly pointed jaw and tooth number.
5
76-80%
Good "4"
6
71-75%
Well
"4"
7
66-70%
Satisfactory
3
8
61-65%
Satisfactory
3
9
55-60%
satisfactory
3
10
50-54%
unsatisfactory
2
11
46-49%
unsatisfactory
2
12
41-45%
unsatisfactory
2
13
36-40%
Unsatisfactory
2
14
31-35%
unsatisfactory
2
May be put into practice, with the matter.
correct diagnoses.
The answer is incomplete. The student
knows the subject, but has not been fully
understood. Understand the issue is the
concept. Incorrectly specified chelyus
Toughness, tooth number is correct.
correctly diagnoses ..
The answer is correct but incomplete.
Student knows the subject, but can not fully
answer. Understand the issue is the
concept.
The answer to half the questions. Jaw and
teeth correctly points out, but is not fully
responsible. Diagnosis puts wrong ..
A half issues. A partial response, with
errors, has a concept. Jaw and teeth
correctly pointsThe diagnosis is wrong.
The answer to half the questions. Jaw and
teeth correctly points out, but is not fully
responsible. Diagnosis puts wrong ..
A half issues. A partial response, with
errors, has a concept. Jaw and teeth
correctly pointsThe diagnosis is wrong.
The answer to the fourth question is
incomplete, with errors. Student does not
know the topic. Jaw and teeth incorrectly
indicates The diagnosis is wrong
The answer to the fifth question. Student
does not know the topic part-time and a
wrong answer.
Reply tenth question wrong. Theme does
not know the answers confusing. Themed
absolutely does not know.
No answer to questions. Theme does not
know.