1 2 Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems 3 Supporting Information for 4 5 A high-order numerical study of reactive dissolution in an upwelling heterogeneous mantle: II. Effect of shear deformation 6 Conroy Baltzell1, E.M. Parmentier1, Yan Liang1, Seshu Tirupathi2, 3 7 8 9 10 11 1. Department of Earth, Environmental and Planetary Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA 2. Division of Applied Mathematics, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA 3. Now at IBM Research, Dublin, Damastown Industrial Park, Mulhuddart, Dublin 15, Ireland 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Contents of this file Supplementary Text 1-9 Figures S1 to S9 Table S1 Captions S1 to S16 Additional Supporting Information (Files uploaded separately) Movies S1-S6 23 24 Introduction 25 26 27 28 29 30 The following text and supporting figures give variations in orthopyroxene (opx) and melt fraction for varying parameters and specific cases that support the main text as well as more detail than strictly necessary on some of the points in the text for readers who are interested. In addition, there is a table that gives the raw data from the numerical experiments used to determine Eqs. 14 and 15 in the text. Lastly, there are movies depicting the full time evolution for some of the figures used in the text. 31 32 33 1 34 35 36 Supplementary Material 1. Steady State vs. Initial Conditions 37 For simulations conducted in the stable regime, the steady-state solutions reported in 38 this study are independent of the initial condition of the channel and instead depend only 39 on the bottom boundary condition of the channel. Figure S1 compares opx and melt 40 fraction at 1 transit or overturn time, i.e., the time it takes for matrix at the bottom of the 41 domain to move out the top (which take 2 dimensionless time units here) for two choices 42 of shear rates. The first case (Figs. S1a-S1d) shows an initial condition corresponding to 43 steady state for γ = 0.1 (Figs. S1a and S1b), which is then sheared for 1 overturn time 44 with a shear rate γ = 0.5 (Figs. S1c and S1d). The second case (Figs. S1e-S1h) shows an 45 initial condition corresponding to steady state for γ = 0.5 (Figs. S1e and S1f), which is 46 then sheared for 1 overturn time with shear rate γ = 0.1 (Figs. S1g and S1h). Figs. S1a 47 and S1b are equivalent to Figs. S1g and S1h and Figs. S1c and S1d to Figs. S1e and S1f. 48 Since the bottom material moves all the way through the domain in 1 overturn time, the 49 steady state is dependent on the bottom boundary condition, but not the initially state of 50 the channel. Thus, if a high porosity region forms a bifurcated channel and then is 51 subsequently sheared, the behavior will not be different from an initially high porosity 52 region as used in this numerical experiment as long at the high porosity is maintained on 53 the bottom boundary. 2 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 Figure S1. Distribution of soluble mineral opx (left column) and porosity (right column) at initial and steady-state showing the independence on initial conditions. (a,b) The steady state evolution for πΈ = 0.1 and is used as the initial condition for (c,d), which has πΈ = 0.5. (e,f) Takes the steady state of the same shear rate as (c,d), πΈ = π.5 and is used as the initial condition for (g,h), which has πΈ = 0.1. There is no qualitative difference between (a,b) and (g,h), and between (c,d) and (e,f). 3 61 2. V-Shaped Channels 62 As the seed channel at the inflow increases its width, the shape of the dunite channel 63 changes from parabolic to more linear (Figs. S2a), as described in Schiemenz et al. 64 [2011b]. For linear or V-shaped channels the behavior changes and bands do not form as 65 readily. Fig. S2 compares opx fraction and porosity as a function of shear rate and inflow 66 geometry. The wider region of opx dissolution inhibits the formation of dunite (due to 67 less melt focusing), further reducing the formation of a low porosity region (Fig. S2c) and 68 the subsequent bifurcation. The asymmetry in the opx is maintained disrupting the dunite 69 formation (Figs S2a, S2c, and Fig. S3). 70 Similarly, the lack of low porosity region formation prevents decompaction on the 71 downwind side. (Fig. S2d). For sufficiently permeable channels with a large enough 72 shear rate (A = 0.28, γ = 1.0), porosity bands can form for a wide channel. However, 73 these bands have a weak amplitude and have little effect on the melt velocity. 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 Figure S2. Steady-state distributions of soluble mineral opx (left column) and porosity (right column) for V-shaped channels with R = 100, ο€ = 0.01, and a channel width of 1 compaction length (w=5 in Eq. 13). (a,b) opx fraction and porosity for πΈ = π.1. (c,d) opx fraction and porosity for πΈ =1. The contour lines correspond to an opx fraction of 0.5. The nearly vertical white lines in (b,d) are melt streamlines and the thicker white lines in (a,c) are solid streamlines. The Gaussian perturbations in porosity at the inflow are shown as black curves at the bottom of the porosity field (20% and 28% above background in ab and c-d, respectively). 4 83 84 85 86 87 Figure S3. Variations in opx fraction across the top of the domain for different shear rates (πΈ) and channel geometries (A and w in Eq. 13) for V-shaped channels. 5 88 3. Steady State for Different Shear Rates and Channel Geometry 89 Figure S4 shows the opx and fluid fraction for a shear rate of 0.5 and 1 with different 90 channel geometries. A shear rate of 0.5 results in fewer porosity bands (cf. Fig. S4b and 91 Fig. 3h) and a more concentrated region of opx depletion (cf. Fig S4a and Fig. 3g) 92 Varying the channel width and amplitude while maintaining the same shear rate 93 results in no qualitative difference, though a quantitative difference in amplitude (cf. Fig. 94 S4d and Fig. 3d). The region of opx dissolution for the wider channel is spread over a 95 larger region. Thus the minimum opx value is greater for the wider channel and the 96 asymmetry in opx gradient around the dunite is reduced. 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 Figure S4. Steady-state distributions of soluble mineral opx (left column) and porosity (right column) for varying shear rates and channel geometries. (a,b) opx fraction and porosity for πΈ = π.5, a channel width of 0.6 compaction lengths. (c,d) opx fraction and porosity for πΈ =1, a channel width of 0.8 compaction lengths. The contour lines in (a,c) correspond to a normalized opx fraction of 0.5. The nearly vertical white lines in (b,d) are fluid streamlines and the thicker white lines in (a,c) are solid streamlines. The timeindependent Gaussian perturbations in porosity at the inflow are shown as magenta curves at the bottom of the porosity field (20% and 28% above background in a-b and cd, respectively). This compares to Figure 3. 108 6 109 4. Opx Depletion as a Function of Shear Rate, Channel Geometry, and Time 110 Figure S5 shows minimum opx fraction with a melt to matrix velocity ratio, R = 100 111 for different shear rates and channel geometries. The minimum opx fraction in the 112 domain increases with increased shear rate and channel width but decreases with 113 decreased channel porosity, consistent with the argument that a higher shear rate and 114 wider/less porous channel inhibit the formation of dunite (that is complete Opx 115 dissolution). Following the solid lines in Fig. S5a, it is apparent that increasing the shear 116 rate inhibits the formation of dunite. For no shear and γ = 0.5 (red and blue respectively), 117 the variation is insignificant to the point that the red line is completely covered by the 118 blue. As the shear rate increases dunite forms later, and for γ = 0.25 (magenta), dunite 119 only forms at 1 over turn time. As γ increases further, dunite ceases to form. 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 Figure S5.Variations in minimum and average opx fraction for different shear rates (πΎ) and channel geometries (A and w in Eq. 13). (a,b) Minimum opx value in the domain at steady state. Variations in color, point style and line style represent variations in πΎ, A, w, respectively. Simulations in (a) vary shear rates, πΎ, w and A in such a way as to keep the melt flux at the bottom boundary constant and equivalent to w = 20 and A = 0.2. Simulations in (b) vary πΎ, w, and A without normalizing the channel geometry such that the melt flux at the bottom boundary is constant. (c) The difference between the average opx fraction at varying times and the initial average opx fraction as a function of height. Initial and final differences are shown as solid lines for varying shear rates πΎ = {0.0, 0.05, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0}. The dashed red lines show the average opx fraction under no shear conditions in increments of 0.2 time units. The maximum difference in opx fraction at a given time between different shear rates is 0.05. 135 does not keep opx dissolution constant. Note the pairs of blue lines and black lines, each A comparison of different line styles in Fig. S5 reveals maintaining a constant flux 7 136 has the same shear rate and the same melt flux at the base of the channel and yet has 137 different minimum opx values with time. 138 Fig. S5b shows that widening the channel inhibits the formation of dunite. For γ = 0.5 139 and a more permeable channel, opx-free dunite fails to form (black solid line); whereas a 140 narrower channel reaches opx-free dunite (black dash-dotted). Similarly, for γ = 0.05 a 141 wide channel fails to form opx-free dunite (dashed blue), whereas a narrow channel 142 reaches opx-free dunite (solid blue). This also reveals the strong dependence of inflow 143 channel parameters: as can be seen in the solid blue and dash-dotted black line, doubling 144 the channel porosity amplitude and reducing the channel width by a factor of 145 comparable effect (achieves opx-free dunite at the same time) to increasing γ by an order 146 of magnitude. 2 3 has a 147 Fig. S5c shows the difference between the average opx fraction at varying times and 148 the initial average opx fraction as a function of height. There is little difference (~0.05) in 149 opx fraction for different shear rates, supporting the observation that the total opx 150 dissolution is independent of shear rate. With time, the average opx fraction decreases 151 due to dissolution. Since the dissolution rate increases with height, the opx fraction 152 decreases with height. 153 8 154 5. Fourier Transform 155 Figure S6 shows the spatial frequency at steady state corresponding to the greatest 156 power following a Fourier Transform as a function of shear rate. The porosity for 157 different channel geometries as well the pressure for a channel of 0.6 compaction lengths 158 and porosity of 20% above background are plotted. As shear rate increases, the frequency 159 tends to decrease, though not linearly. The pressure (blue line), matches the 160 corresponding porosity (back line) well. 161 162 163 164 165 166 Figure S6. Frequency vs. shear rate for different channel geometries. Porosity is shown in solid lines. Pressure corresponding to a channel of 0.6 compaction lengths and porosity of 20% is shown with the blue dashed lines. 9 167 6. Melt Travel Time 168 The effects of the alternating porosity pattern on the melt velocities are illustrated in 169 Figure S7 which shows the time it takes for melt to move from the bottom to the top of 170 the domain following the fluid streamline of minimum time as a function of non- 171 dimensionalized time (run to steady state) for a melt to solid upwelling velocity ratio R = 172 100. A dashed black line at the top of the plot shows the travel time far away from the 173 channel where the porosity is the background porosity. Since shearing creates low 174 porosity regions, it increases travel time through the domain. While the fluid streamlines 175 are deflected towards the high porosity regions and away from the low porosity regions, 176 they are not sufficiently deflected to only stay within a high porosity region (as in the 177 case of no shear). The greater the shear rate, the more compacted region the fluid has to 178 pass through, reducing fluid speeds. 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 Figure S7. Time for melt to travel through the domain following the fastest streamline for varying conditions of shear rates, πΈ, and channel geometries, A and w, as a function of non-dimensionalized time. The dashed black line is the time for a streamline in the background, without the influence of the high porosity channel. The channel permeability was normalized by the width to keep the flux in all cases a constant corresponding to a porosity of 20% above background (A = 0.2 in Eq. 13) and a channel width of 0.6 compaction lengths (w = 20). 10 187 188 In general, however, while shearing disrupts the porous pathways, compaction- 189 dissolution still increases the porosity such that the travel time decreases with time. 190 Furthermore, the influence of shearing is dependent on the channel width wherein for a 191 narrower channel the disruption of the porous path is more significant. For sufficiently 192 narrow channels (0.4 compaction lengths wide and a porosity of 28% above background), 193 even though compaction-dissolution begins strongly decreasing the travel time with 194 channel evolution time, the disruption from shearing becomes significant enough to 195 increase the travel time from the initial, un-sheared, conditions. 196 The melt travel time goes as 1/R. For a constant R and physically reasonable 197 variations in shear rate and channel width/porosity, melt travel time can vary by as much 198 as a factor of 2. For R = 100, the non-dimensionalized times are around 0.01, which 199 gives dimensionalized times of 0.02L/Vz to pass through the domain. For matrix 200 upwelling rates of 10 mm/yr melt velocities are approximately 1-2 m/yr, giving a time to 201 travel 50 km of 25-50 kyr. Since the half life of 230Th about 30 kyr, a travel time change 202 of this magnitude may be detectable in MORBS [Kelemen et al. 1997]. 203 11 204 7. Non-zero Shearing at the Base of the Domain 205 To explore the effects of varying shearing at the bottom of the domain a modified 206 matrix velocity, ππ₯ = πΎ(π§ + β0 ), was used for h0 ≠ 0. Figure S8 displays opx and melt 207 fractions as a function of different conditions of shear, domain heights H, and β0 for the 208 same inflow boundary conditions as Figure 1. For a constant height, the behavior of the 209 melt fraction is dependent on the integral over the domain of ππ₯ : 210 π» πΌπ§ = ∫0 πΎ0 (π§ + β0 )ππ§ . (S1) 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 Figure S8: Steady-state distributions of soluble mineral opx and porosity under three different conditions of shear rate (πΈ), domain height (H), and horizontal matrix velocity at the bottom of the domain (ππ ) with a channel porosity of 20% above background and a width of 0.6 compaction lengths. The black and white contours correspond to pressure. The black horizontal line in the opx field is a contour for a normalized opx fraction of 0.25. The white line in the opx field is the solid streamline. Nearly vertical white lines in 12 218 219 220 221 the porosity field correspond to melt streamlines. Parameters used in the simulations are given in each panel. Iz is 1 for (a) and (b) and 2.25 for (c)-(f). 222 however, the fluid fraction changes even for constant πΌπ§ . For πΌπ§ = 2.25, when the domain 223 height is constant, H = 2.5, the behavior is the same even for different πΎ and β0 (Figs. 224 S8e and S8f). However as the domain height changes, so does the behavior (Fig. S8d). Fig. S8b is equivalent to Fig. S4a (πΌπ§ = 1 for both). As the domain height varies, 225 As γ increases the maximum opx dissolution still follows the solid streamline, but 226 another peak of high opx dissolution emerges (as seen in the opx contours in Fig. S8c). 227 With increased γ and β0 the second peak becomes stronger reaching the point of two 228 regions of maximum opx dissolution. This results in a new pattern of asymmetric opx 229 distribution, as illustrated in Figure S9 below. 230 231 232 233 Figure S9. Variations in opx fraction across the top of the domain for different shear rates (πΈ) and shearing at the bottom of the domain (ππ ). 13 234 8. Time Evolution 235 Movies S1-S3 show the temporal evolution of opx fraction, porosity, and pressure, 236 respectively, associated with Figs. 1a-1c. The scale bars, streamlines, and contour plots 237 are the same as in Fig. 1 and each cycle corresponds to 0.02 nondimensional time units. 238 Movies M4-M6 show the temporal evolution of opx fraction, porosity, and pressure 239 respectively associated with Fig. 3. The scale bars, streamlines, and contour plots are the 240 same as in Fig. 3 and each cycle corresponds to 0.02 nondimensional time units. 241 242 Movie S1. Temporal evolution of opx fraction. Streamlines and contours are the same as 243 in Figure 1d. Each cycle corresponds to 0.02 nondimensional time units. 244 245 Movie S2. Temporal evolution of porosity. Streamlines and contours are the same as in 246 Figure 1e. Each cycle corresponds to 0.02 nondimensional time units. 247 248 Movie S3. Temporal evolution of pressure. Streamlines and contours are the same as in 249 Figure 1f. Each cycle corresponds to 0.02 nondimensional time units. 250 251 Movie S4. Temporal evolution of opx fraction. Streamlines and contours are the same as 252 in Figures 3a, 3d, and 3g. Each cycle corresponds to 0.02 nondimensional time units. 253 254 Movie S5. Temporal evolution of porosity. Streamlines and contours are the same as in 255 Figures 4b, 4e, and 4h. Each cycle corresponds to 0.02 nondimensional time units. 256 257 Movie S6. Temporal evolution of pressure. Streamlines and contours are the same as in 258 Figures 3c, 3f, and 3i. Each cycle corresponds to 0.02 nondimensional time units. 14 259 Table S1. Data used to construct Eqs. 14 and 15. Trial 260 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38* 39* γ δ R 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.5 0.5 0.25 0.25 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.25 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.75 0.9 1 1.25 0.3 0.4 10 25 50 75 125 25 50 75 125 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 H 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.003 0.005 0.008 0.013 0.015 0.018 0.005 0.008 0.013 0.015 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1.5 2.5 3 3.5 2.5 3 3.5 2.5 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Angle(α) Spacing(δsp) 49.2 1.11 39.3 0.702 34.2 0.552 32.0 0.481 28.4 0.411 35.8 0.801 31.0 0.633 27.5 0.556 30.1 0.430 29.2 0.439 30.1 0.439 30.1 0.439 30.0 0.439 24.7 0.480 24.7 0.480 24.7 0.480 22.7 0.595 23.7 0.595 32.6 0.616 30.9 0.517 31.0 0.474 30.1 0.411 28.4 0.383 30.1 0.386 28.4 0.586 26.6 0.528 27.4 0.455 27.4 0.419 19.8 0.595 19.8 0.550 24.6 0.516 25.6 0.488 26.5 0.464 29.2 0.439 31.8 0.424 33.4 0.417 35.7 0.378 -0.544 -0.492 15 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 40* 41* 42* 43* 44* 45* 46* 0.5 0.6 0.75 0.9 1 1.25 1.5 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 ------38.6 0.481 0.460 0.426 0.419 0.413 0.407 0.377 List of the parameters, and resulting band spacing and band angle used for the numerical experiments as plotted in Fig. 6. The shear rate (πΈ) ranges from 0.25-1.5, the ratio of fluid to solid upwelling rate (R) from 10-125; the dimensionless solubility gradient (πΉ) from 0.0025-0.0175; and the domain height (H) from 1.5-3.5. The depth of the low porosity band was taken to be the bottom of the contour corresponding to 95% of the background for most of the measurements (and high porosity 105%), though the measurements with asterisks had depths at 85% and 115%. There is no significant difference between the two measurement methods. To avoid double counting, the band angles were not repeated for the second measurement method, and hence those are left dashed. 16