INSERT AGENCY LOGO –
REMOVE TEXT BOX LINE
GRANT OUTCOMES SUMMARY FOR SFP 10-14
In 2011, two years of start-up funding was awarded by the Pennsylvania Commission on Crime and
Delinquency to implement The Strengthening Families Program: For Parents and Youth 10-14 (SFP 1014) in (insert location). This report summarizes the data results through (indicate data timeline).
SFP 10-14 WAS SELECTED TO MEET LOCAL NEEDS!
SFP 10-14 is a 7-week evidenced-based program recognized as a Blueprints Promising Program. It helps families
navigate the normal challenges of the teen years. It was selected….Explain why SFP 10-14 was selected for local
implementation. Share specific data.
Participation and Dosage
POPULATION SERVED:
XX%
Description of the Targeted Population:
100
Number of Participants
Describe the overall demographics of the
population served (age range, gender ratio, &
race/ethnicities served if known). Also explain
the make-up of family structures served (e.g.
foster parents, grandparents, step-parents).
Explain risks and other characteristics of the
population (e.g. poverty and crime rates).
60 55
Completing 5 or
More Sessions
0
Caregivers
Program Satisfaction: Include the average rating for
facilitators from the participant surveys as a client
satisfaction indicator.
Youth
Number of 7 Week Programs:
x
Number of Families Served:
x
Total Caregivers Served:
x
Total Youth Served:
x
Fidelity: Average of Observation Ratings
100
Percentage
Implementation Strengths: Highlight areas of
strength identified during fidelity observations and
the quality assurance review by the developer.
Participating
40 38
50
IMPLEMENTATION QUALITY:
Fidelity Assessment Process: Observations were
conducted of 2 parent, 2 youth, and 2 family
sessions per 7-week program and the ratings for the
curriculum content and the facilitators’ delivery
style were expected to be 75% or greater.
XX%
95
98
94
Average Parent
Session Rating
50
Average Youth
Session Rating
0
Parent
Youth
Family
Sessions Sessions Sessions
Total Number Observations: x
Average Family
Session Rating
PARTICIPANT OUTCOMES
CAREGIVERS SURVEYED: X
YOUTH SURVEYED: X
Positive Change in Surveyed Youth
100
90
75
Percentage
80

60
60
40
The local outcomes highlighted to the
left reflect short-term participant
changes in skills, attitudes, beliefs, and
behaviors. Short-term outcomes are
expected to lead to the long-term
outcomes demonstrated 6 years and
beyond program completion in the
stringent research on SFP 10-14:
20
0
PM 1
PM 2
PM 3
Positive Change in Survyed Caregivers
100
90
75
Percentage
80
60
 Delayed initiation and decreased use
of alcohol, tobacco, marijuana,
prescription drugs, and
methamphetamine by youth
60
 Decreased youth aggression &
destructive behaviors
40
 Decreased youth anxiety and
depression
20
0
PM 1
PM 2
PM 3
 Increased youth school engagement
and achievement
Positive Change in Surveyed Families
Research has demonstrated SFP 10-14
100
90
75
80
Percentage
Long-term Outcomes
60
60
40
to be COST-EFFECTIVE with a
return of $9.60 for each dollar invested.
Savings of up to $5,923 per participating
family can be realized when SFP 10-14 is
implemented with quality and model
adherence.
BY SERVING X FAMILIES, SFP 1014 POTENTIALLY SAVED $X FOR
OUR COMMUNITY!
20
0
PM 1
PM 2
PM 3



For the survey completion counts on the previous page, be certain to only indicate the number of
caregivers and youth completing both a pre and post survey or a retrospective survey.
For each chart, use the Excel tool provided to aggregate data from years 1 and 2. Select the three
performance measures from each component with the highest percentages to highlight in the charts.
Click on the charts to add the data and performance measure titles.
To edit the charts, left click on the mouse, click on design in the tool bar, and then click on edit data. An
Excel sheet will pop-up. Enter data in the highlighted cells. Hover over the cells with the mouse to read
comment boxes with instructions.
SURVEY TOOLS AND ADMINISTRATION
Survey Administration Process:
The data reflected in this report was captured through pre and post surveys given in weeks one and seven to
the caregiver and youth participants. Retrospective surveys were given to participants starting the program
after week one.
Survey Design:
 The caregivers were asked 33 questions that assessed: substance use rules and expectations, child
monitoring, standard/rule setting, parental supportiveness, and communication of values and goals.
 The youth were asked 26 questions that assessed: consistent discipline, stress coping skills, family
communication, future orientation/goal setting, and peer pressure refusal skills.
 Both the caregivers and youth reported on: positive rule enforcement, parent-child relationship quality,
and family cooperation and problem solving.
PARTICIPANT, STAFF, & COMMUNITY TESTIMONIALS
In this section, share testimonials and describe qualitative impacts not reflected in your performance measure
data. Examples might include:
 Families who have shared the impact of the program upon their relationships and family
dynamics via testimonials or quotes from the surveys.
 The program generates interest in continued interaction and a local organization, recognizing the
value of SFP 10-14, funds a parent support group to help participants maintain learned skills.
 A teacher reports improved classroom behavior and learning and credits it to students’
attendance in SFP 10-14.
 A Children and Youth Services case manager provides a testimonial to changes they have seen in a
referred family.
 Facilitators provide feedback on their commitment, professional development gained, changes
observed in families, or the passion they hold for the program.
Measurement instruments of client satisfaction, including feedback forms, the feedback questions added to the
end of the surveys, participant quotes/testimonials, and facilitator ratings can also be used to respond.
FOR MORE INFORMATION, CONTACT:
Insert - Agency Name
Phone Number - Email Address -Website Address