CALIFORNIA
ELECTRONIC
INTERCEPTIONS REPORT
Annual Report
to the
Legislature
2014
CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
KAMALA D. HARRIS
Attorney General
Division of Criminal Law
Appeals, Writs & Trials Unit
This annual report is available on the
California Attorney General’s website:
http://ag.ca.gov
Table of Contents
Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................... 1
Table 1: Arrests and Convictions Resulting from Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year
2014. .................................................................................................................................................. 2
Table 2: General Description of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 .................. 3
Table 3: Electronic Interception Orders Issued by Judges And Court Activity During Calendar
Year 2014 .......................................................................................................................................... 4
Table 4: Description of Communications Obtained and Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014 .............................................................................................................. 5
Table 5: Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report ................................................................. 59
Table 6: Costs of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 ..................................... 113
Table 7: Jurisdiction Reporting No Electronic Interception Activity During Calendar
Year 2014 ...................................................................................................................................... 158
Table 8: Summary of Supplemental Reports for Interceptions Conducted in Prior Years ......... 159
Table 9: List of Electronic Interception Orders Approved But Never Used or Installed
- Calendar Year 2014. .................................................................................................................. 163
Appendix A: Penal Code section 629.62 “Report by Attorney General” .................................... 165
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Executive Summary
The Attorney General’s Electronic Interceptions Report 2014, is issued pursuant to Penal
Code section 629.62 and can be referenced on the Attorney General’s website at http://oag.ca.gov.
Electronic intercepts are legally sanctioned surveillance of electronic communications for law
enforcement purposes. This report contains electronic interception data and describes how electronic
intercepts have enhanced the ability of state and federal law enforcement agencies to identify and dismantle
drug trafficking organizations (DTO), solve serious and violent crimes and incapacitate criminal street gangs.
Multi-national DTO’s, criminal street gangs, and individuals often use telecommunications to advance their
illegal objectives. These illegal objectives include kidnapping, organized crime, drug trafficking, and
murder. Through use of court-authorized electronic intercepts, law enforcement has an effective tool to
investigate and prevent these crimes. In some cases, electronic intercepts have led to solving decade-old
crimes where no other avenue produced results. In other cases, DTO activity was halted and millions of
dollars in narcotic proceeds as well as voluminous amounts of narcotics were seized.
Several counties provide exemplary examples of the benefits of electronic intercepts:
Stanislaus County (2014-STA-70) utilized electronic intercepts to dismantle a drug
smuggling cartel operating from Mexico to Northern California. As a result of the
interceptions, over 700 pounds of methamphetamine was seized.
Riverside County (2014-RIV-1097) worked with federal agents in using electronic
intercepts to gather intelligence to stop a large-scale cocaine smuggling operation based out
of two South American countries.
Sonoma County (2014-SON-7) successfully employed electronic intercepts to
gather crucial information on a 1992 unsolved murder.
A Los Angeles County (2014-LA-811) investigation, which included electronic
intercepts, of a DTO concluded with sixteen people arrested with more arrests expected, the
seizure of $1 million in narcotic proceeds, 600 pounds of methamphetamine, and multiple
vehicles.
From intelligence-gathering to arrests and prosecutions, these examples demonstrate that electronic
intercepts are essential tools that law enforcement employs to combat the ever-changing criminal element.
Though the report is divided into separate tables, the tables should be read in conjunction with one
another to evaluate the impact intercepts have on public safety. Tables 1, 2, and 3 reflect the statistics of
arrest, convictions and nature of intercept orders and post-intercept court activity. Table 4 contains a
description of and optional commentary for each intercept. Table 5 represents compliance with the inventory
notice requirement given to those who were subjected to intercepts. Table 6 shows the cost of each intercept.
Table 7 lists counties with no intercepts to report. Table 8 provides supplemental information for intercepts
approved prior to 2014 but completed later. Finally, Table 9 lists intercept orders which were never used. If
you have any questions or comments about this report, please contact the Criminal Law Division of the
Attorney General’s Office at (916) 445-9555.
1
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 1
Arrests and Convictions Resulting from Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 20141
3.3
2.0
2
4
11
Los Angeles
Madera
129
8
33
0
3.0
1
30
Merced
Napa
1
1
0
0
Orange
Placer
3
2
3
4
1.5
4.0
3
4
Riverside
Sacramento
624
6
176
19
2.2
4.8
3
San Bernardino
San Diego
30
14
51
34
3.0
5.7
28
23
San Joaquin
Santa Barbara
18
4
29
10
5.8
3.3
5
25
10
Santa Clara
Sonoma
13
2
35
1
8.8
1.0
2
1
11
Stanislaus
Tulare
14
11
12
3
4.0
1.5
2
Ventura
28
16
3.2
2
6
8
971
482
59
109
351
Total:
Avg. per
Order
13
4
2
Total
19
2
23
Other
Kern
Kings
20
2
Kidnapping
11.5
2
Terrorism
0
23
Narcotics
2
24
12
2
Murder
El Dorado
Fresno
2
Number of
Persons
Convicted
Conviction Offenses
Other
7.0
1.0
Kidnapping
14
2
Terrorism
10
6
Narcotics
Avg. per
Order
Alameda
Contra Costa
Gang
No of
Orders
Murder
Reporting
Jurisdiction
Total
Arrest Offenses
Gang
Number
of
Persons
Arrested
0
2
1.0
0
0
20
3
3
0
0.8
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
166
16
15
32
0
0
7
18
2
18
0.1
3.0
10
5
0
5
1.7
28
3
3
0
0.8
10
1
1
0
0.3
2
5
7
1.4
4
37
7
1
0
23
2
2
0
0
0
41
1
The disparity between “Number of Persons Arrested” and “Number of Persons Convicted” may be attributed to the fact that a number of those arrested are pending either charges
or trial, a process which could take a period of time, or that the intercept was a part of a large-scale investigation.
2
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 2
General Description of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
1
3
Placer
Riverside
2
624
2
2
603
Sacramento
San Bernardino
6
30
2
8
4
22
San Diego
San Joaquin
14
18
2
18
15
Santa Barbara
Santa Clara
4
13
1
2
3
6
3
10
Sonoma
Stanislaus
2
14
2
1
1
13
Tulare
Ventura
11
28
7
11
24
8
3
1
2
3
2
2
22
18
1
2
126
1
4
1
67
8
1
12
20
1
1
3
1
1
8
1
1
3
1
3
2
624
2
622
6
30
6
30
14
14
14
17
4
13
4
13
2
14
2
14
10
28
11
28
Other
1
3
104
10
6
2
Computer
Napa
Orange
3
1
4
10
6
2
Pager
8
1
1
Land Line
Madera
Merced
21
13
Cell Phone
2
18
14
Targeted Device
Other
2
129
2
Portable
device
Kings
Los Angeles
4
Public Area
3
6
Business
24
19
Targeted Location
Residence
Fresno
Kern
8
4
Other
10
Kidnapping
10
6
2
Narcotics
Alameda
Contra Costa
El Dorado
Gang
No. of
Orders
Murder
Reporting
Jurisdiction
Terrorism
Targeted Offenses
(Offenses Specified in Order)
9
1
1
3
4
2
3
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 3
Electronic Interception Orders Issued by Judges
And Court Activity During Calendar Year 20142
2
1
3
6
2
1
1
10
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
37
36
30
2
2
18
191 184 7
2
18 18
10 10 1
3
2
1
2
30
30
10
30
1
1
30
30
30
1
3
3
27
15
2
4
27
2
4
27 15
30
30
0
23
53
10
21
19
18
36
28
63
5
5
18
27
16
42
42
28
16
26
5
26
36
23
2
1
2
Pending
230
153
20
499
366
35
4672
222
63
5
16
35
17009
98
1259
590
497
63
337
9
359
394
642
Denied
300
180
21
780
600
60
4969
222
63
30
90
60
24403
140
1440
720
600
90
472
60
480
434
840
Motions
to
Suppress
Granted
Avg. per Order
1
Actual Days
Not Installed/
Installed Not
Used
Average Length
Denied
Modified/Amended
Granted
Applications
Not Installed/
Installed Not Used
Denied
9
6
2
24
19
2
129
8
1
1
3
2
602
6
30
14
17
4
13
2
14
11
28
Modified/Amended
10
6
2
24
19
2
129
8
1
1
3
2
624
6
30
14
18
4
13
2
14
11
28
Total
Duration of
Wiretaps
Requested Days
Alameda
Contra Costa
El Dorado
Fresno
Kern
Kings
Los Angeles
Madera
Merced
Napa
Orange
Placer
Riverside
Sacramento
San Bernardino
San Diego
San Joaquin
Santa Barbara
Santa Clara
Sonoma
Stanislaus
Tulare
Ventura
Granted
Reporting
Jurisdiction
Applications
Number of Intercept Orders Number of Extensions
Number of
Trials
Resulting
from
Intercepts
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
The purpose of obtaining electronic intercept evidence is not always trial-focused and may relate to further investigation at the state or federal level as well as crime prevention.
4
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 4
Description of Communications Obtained and
Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
Alameda
Contra Costa
EICOS No.
Approximate No.
of Persons
Whose
Communications
Were Intercepted
3
Nature & Frequency
(Penal Code 629.62(9))
Incriminating
Communications
(%)
Other
Communications
(%)
2014-ALA-19
257
9,967
4
96
2014-ALA-20
18
240
1
99
2014-ALA-24
120
11,592
3
97
2014-ALA-28
45
555
10
90
2014-ALA-29
433
6,908
17
83
2014-ALA-30
257
8,395
2
98
2014-ALA-31
205
7,407
9
91
2014-ALA-32
167
5,593
23
77
2014-ALA-33
92
2,352
4
96
2014-ALA-34
144
4,185
4
96
13
87
2014-CO-1
2014-CO-2
El Dorado
Total No. of
Communications
Intercepted
Comments on Usefulness of
Intercept 3
Wiretap targeted a murder suspect.
Suspect was arrested and charged
based in part upon the intercepted
communications and surveillance
operations conducted during the
interception. Case is pending.
Wire tap operation targeted a
murder suspect. Suspect was
arrested and charged based in part
upon the wire interception and
accompanying surveillance. Case is
still active and pending.
8,230
180
2,205
2014-CC-8
2,017
2014-CC-9
3,011
See CCCDA 14-001.
2014-CC-10
0
See CCCDA 14-006.
2014-CC-11
0
2014-ED-1
64
996
1
99
A phone intercept was conducted to
investigate a potential murder-forhire plot on a peace officer.
2014-ED-2
27
411
1
99
See 2014-ED-1.
Comments are not mandated and may be edited
5
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 4
Description of Communications Obtained and
Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
Fresno
EICOS No.
Approximate No.
of Persons
Whose
Communications
Were Intercepted
Total No. of
Communications
Intercepted
Nature & Frequency
(Penal Code 629.62(9))
Incriminating
Communications
(%)
Other
Communications
(%)
Comments on Usefulness of
Intercept 3
2014-FR-6
187
8,320
11
89
This wiretap was used to investigate
an attempted murder. The
interceptions provided information
regarding narcotic trafficking.
Detectives arrested five suspects
and seized two vehicles and
$14,110 in narcotic proceeds,
37 pounds of marijuana, 2,336
milliliters of Codeine and 29
Oxycodone tablets. The suspects
arrested are known to be involved in
narcotic sales and violent crimes.
The seized narcotics and the
suspects arrested will have a
positive impact on the community.
2014-FR-7
36
339
3
97
See 2014-FR-6.
2014-FR-8
9
316
3
97
See 2014-FR-6.
This wire interrupted a major supply
source of methamphetamine in the
Fresno area. The target phone was
intercepted and monitored to identify
those involved in transportation and
distribution.
This wire is part of an ongoing effort
to interupt a major supply source of
methamphetamine in the Fresno
area.
2014-FR-9
12
239
66
44
2014-FR-11
26
563
52
48
2014-FR-13
6
108
41
59
See 2014-FR-11.
2014-FR-14
16
272
73
27
See 2014-FR-11.
2014-FR-15
23
648
39
61
See 2014-FR-11.
2014-FR-16
62
2,166
39
61
2014-FR-17
29
565
28
72
2014-FR-18
84
1,266
47
53
Through related wires, agents
identified a drug trafficking
organization (DTO) that operated
out of Southern California, Arizona,
and Mexico. The investigation is
ongoing and dismantling of the DTO
is anticipated.
This wire resulted in the arrest of
one subject, seizure of 17 pounds of
narcotics, as well as the
identification of co-conspirators and
sources of supply. One additional
arrest is expected and an additional
warrant for arrest was issued for
major narcotics transactions.
See FR-2014-16.
6
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 4
Description of Communications Obtained and
Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
Fresno
(cont’d)
Kern
EICOS No.
Approximate No.
of Persons
Whose
Communications
Were Intercepted
Total No. of
Communications
Intercepted
Nature & Frequency
(Penal Code 629.62(9))
Incriminating
Communications
(%)
Other
Communications
(%)
Comments on Usefulness of
Intercept 3
2014-FR-19
270
1,106
29
71
During this investigation, agents
made 43 arrests, seized 7 pounds of
cocaine, 43 pounds of
methamphetamine, 15 guns,
$52,000 in narcotic proceeds, and
served 18 search warrants.
Subsequently, the investigation
targeted a specific criminal street
gang and dismantled a gang-related
DTO and removed much of the
capability of that gang to raise funds
through the distribution of illegal
drugs.
2014-FR-20
44
40
30
70
See 2014-FR-19.
2014-FR-21
204
3,932
42
58
See 2014-FR-19.
2014-FR-22
0
0
0
0
See 2014-FR-19.
2014-FR-23
295
690
24
76
See 2014-FR-19.
2014-FR-24
268
1,436
28
72
See 2014-FR-19.
2014-FR-25
87
532
32
68
See 2014-FR-19.
2014-FR-26
79
901
29
71
See 2014-FR-19.
2014-FR-27
322
9,338
19
81
See 2014-FR-19.
2014-FR-28
62
205
33
67
See 2014-FR-19.
2014-FR-29
158
425
32
68
See 2014-FR-19.
2014-FR-30
92
169
29
71
See 2014-FR-19.
2014-FR-31
116
168
39
61
See 2014-FR-19.
2013-KE-35
206
5,557
14
86
A county, state, and federal task
force investigated a regional drug
trafficking organization (DTO)
operating in Central California, with
suspected direct ties to an unknown
DTO in Mexico. The DTO was
believed to have been capable of
distributing multiple pounds of illicit
narcotics, specifically crystal
methamphetamine (45 lbs. at a
time) and heroin, within Kern
County. This investigation is
ongoing with plans to disrupt and/or
dismantle the major drug operation.
2013-KE-36
206
609
15
85
See 2014-KE-35.
7
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 4
Description of Communications Obtained and
Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
Kern
(cont’d)
EICOS No.
Approximate No.
of Persons
Whose
Communications
Were Intercepted
Total No. of
Communications
Intercepted
Nature & Frequency
(Penal Code 629.62(9))
Incriminating
Communications
(%)
Other
Communications
(%)
Comments on Usefulness of
Intercept 3
Law enforcement recovered two
firearms, six pounds of crystal
methamphetamine, quantities of
cocaine and heroin, and 200
marijuana plants during an
investigation into a multi-state and
multi-country drug organization.
This investigation resulted in the
seizure of the account, which
contained $40,000, and the arrests
of two people who pled guilty and
have been sentenced.
During a multi-agency
(county/state/federal) ongoing
investigation into importation and
distribution of narcotics, agents were
able to disrupt and impede the
subject’s ability to import narcotics.
At the conclusion of the wiretap, the
multiagency task force successfully
dismantled the drug trafficking
organization (DTO). Law
enforcement was also able to make
a large impact on two local gangs.
Without the evidence obtained from
intercepted conversations, this
investigation would not have been
as successful in identifying the
known gang members.
2014-KE-37
2
14
93
7
2014-KE-38
1
15
100
0
2014-KE-39
148
16,760
2
98
2014-KE-40
1
4
50
50
See 2014-KE-38.
2014-KE-41
40
2,518
3
97
See 2014-KE-39.
2014-KE-42
22
581
4.5
95
See 2014-KE-39.
2014-KE-43
75
11,930
2
98
See 2014-KE-39.
2014-KE-44
0
See 2014-KE-39.
2014-KE-45
4
248
10
90
A multiagency and multistate
investigation identified a large scale
cocaine broker working in Kern
County who was directly connected
to drug trafficking cartels located in
Tijuana. Agents passed
investigative leads to law
enforcement officers in other
counties and states as a result of
this wiretap investigation. The
investigation is ongoing.
2014-KE-46
3
86
45
55
See 2014-KE-45.
2015-KE-47
14
190
35
65
Further investigation regarding a
double murder is pending.
2015-KE-48
14
38
0
100
See 2014-KE-45.
8
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 4
Description of Communications Obtained and
Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
Kern
(cont’d)
Kings
Los Angeles
EICOS No.
Approximate No.
of Persons
Whose
Communications
Were Intercepted
Total No. of
Communications
Intercepted
Nature & Frequency
(Penal Code 629.62(9))
Incriminating
Communications
(%)
Other
Communications
(%)
Comments on Usefulness of
Intercept 3
This investigation identified a
narcotics trafficker dealing in high
quantities of crystal
methamphetamine. Three subjects
were successfully identified and
federally indicted. Furthermore, the
investigation resulted in the seizure
of $14,004 and 3 pounds of crystal
methamphetamine. The availability
and amount of crystal
methamphetamine in the area has
been decreased.
This was a homicide investigation
regarding a conspiracy to commit
murder. Detectives arrested both
conspirators and this case is
pending in the Kern County Superior
Court.
2014-KE-49
5
1,639
35
65
2014-KE-50
14
5,626
2
98
2014-KE-51
14
5,626
2
98
See 2014-KE-50.
2014-KE-52
14
5,626
2
98
See 2014-KE-50.
2014-KE-53
14
5,626
2
98
See 2014-KE-50.
An automatic rifle and marijuana
were seized. Three people were
arrested for a gang-related
homicide.
Wire was initiated to intercept
evidence for a murder-for-hire plot.
The wiretap provided additional
evidence against the suspect, a
gang member. An arrest is pending.
No significant enforcement activity
during this 30-day period.
2014-KI-16
9
4,200
2014-KI-17
1
6
2014-LA-747
294
8,258
2014-LA-748
43
315
2014-LA-749
380
3,915
2014-LA-750
47
967
2014-LA-751
96
3,506
2014-LA-752
5
220
24
76
2014-LA-753
380
3,915
14
86
2014-LA-754
50
566
24
76
14
100
This WT2 report covers Los Angeles
County wiretap 14-01 for Target
Telephone #50.
The subject discontinued using this
phone. This investigation is
ongoing.
This WT2 report covers Los Angeles
County wiretap 14-03 for Target
Telephone #51.
The subject discontinued using both
phones as their primary means of
communication. The investigation is
ongoing.
The subject discontinued using this
phone. The investigation is
ongoing.
9
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 4
Description of Communications Obtained and
Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Approximate No.
of Persons
Whose
Communications
Were Intercepted
Los Angeles
(cont’d)
2014-LA-755
96
2014-LA-756
Total No. of
Communications
Intercepted
Nature & Frequency
(Penal Code 629.62(9))
Incriminating
Communications
(%)
Other
Communications
(%)
3,506
2.5
97.5
5
64
84
16
2014-LA-757
380
5,558
14.5
85
2014-LA-758
103
3,501
37
63
2014-LA-759
37
568
16
84
2014-LA-760
4
23
50
50
2014-LA-761
43
315
4
96
2014-LA-762
0
0
2014-LA-763
64
2,353
8
92
2014-LA-764
79
2,769
32
68
2014-LA-765
968
8,462
4
96
2014-LA-766
50
2,454
20
80
2014-LA-768
75
1,001
20
80
2014-LA-769
0
2014-LA-770
36
716
18
82
2014-LA-771
19
3,433
10
90
2014-LA-772
169
6,563
36
64
Comments on Usefulness of
Intercept 3
The subject discontinued using this
phone. The investigation is
ongoing.
The subjects discontinued using
both phones as their primary means
of communication. The investigation
is ongoing.
Based on intercepted conversations,
law enforcement conducted
surveillance and served a search
warrant at a stash location.
Investigators seized 50 pounds of
methamphetamine, 10 kilograms of
cocaine and $21,900 in narcotic
proceeds.
The subject discontinued using this
phone. The investigation is
ongoing.
No significant enforcement activity
during this 30-day period.
No significant enforcement activity
during this 30-day period.
The subject discontinued using this
phone. The investigation is
ongoing.
The ubject discontinued using this
phone. The investigation is
ongoing.
No significant enforcement activity
during this 30-day period.
The subject used the phone to
conduct narcotics trafficking
activities involving marijuana. The
investigation is ongoing.
The subject discontinued using this
phone. The investigation is
ongoing.
No significant enforcement activity
during this 30-day period.
The subject discontinued using this
phone. The investigation is
ongoing.
The subject discontinued using this
phone. The investigation is
ongoing.
The subject discontinued using this
phone. The investigation is
ongoing.
One arrest was made and 36 grams
of cocaine was seized.
10
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 4
Description of Communications Obtained and
Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
Los Angeles
(cont’d)
EICOS No.
Approximate No.
of Persons
Whose
Communications
Were Intercepted
Total No. of
Communications
Intercepted
Nature & Frequency
(Penal Code 629.62(9))
Incriminating
Communications
(%)
Other
Communications
(%)
2014-LA-773
61
2,771
13
87
2014-LA-774
105
2,750
20
80
2014-LA-775
125
1,965
11
89
2014-LA-776
93
821
27
73
2014-LA-777
10
175
15
85
2014-LA-778
63
776
22
78
2014-LA-779
86
4,501
14
86
2014-LA-780
0
2014-LA-781
5
1,342
12
88
2014-LA-782
5
61
10
90
2014-LA-783
27
559
23
77
2013-LA-786
846
33,991
2014-LA-787
16
621
7
93
2014-LA-788
279
4,823
20
80
Comments on Usefulness of
Intercept 3
The subjects of this investigation are
believed to have temporarily
suspended their narcotics trafficking
due to seizures of narcotics and
proceeds of narcotics in the days
and weeks prior to this wiretap. The
investigation is ongoing.
One arrest was made, and agents
seized 9 pounds of
methamphetamine and $25,000 in
narcotic proceeds.
Based on interceptions obtained
from Wiretap 14-42, 2 subjects were
arrested, and 6 pounds of
methamphetamine were seized.
The subject obtained a new phone
which was being used as the
primary means of communication.
The subject was arrested with 11
kilograms of cocaine.
No significant enforcement activity
during this 30-day period.
The subject discontinued using this
phone. The investigation is
ongoing.
The subject discontinued using this
phone. The investigation is
ongoing.
The subject discontinued using this
phone. The investigation is
ongoing.
The subject discontinued use of this
phone after an unrelated arrest.
The investigation is ongoing.
The intercepted communications
have assisted investigators identify
other phone numbers and
individuals engaged in the
distribution of narcotics. The
investigation is ongoing in order to
identify and dismantle this Southern
California-based narcotics trafficking
network.
Subjects were believed to be
invovled in murders that occurred in
2012 and 2013.
Target telephone intercepted for
approximately 8 days before the
phone was disposed.
The subjects discontinued using
these phone. The investigation is
ongoing.
11
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 4
Description of Communications Obtained and
Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
Los Angeles
(cont’d)
EICOS No.
Approximate No.
of Persons
Whose
Communications
Were Intercepted
Total No. of
Communications
Intercepted
Nature & Frequency
(Penal Code 629.62(9))
Incriminating
Communications
(%)
Other
Communications
(%)
Comments on Usefulness of
Intercept 3
2014-LAK-2
168
2,909
37
63
The subject was involved in a
money-laundering operation. This
intercept provided significant leads
to other investigations and cases.
The investigation is ongoing.
2014-LA-789
168
2,909
37
63
See 2014-LAK-2.
2014-LA-790
205
10,813
5
95
2014-LA-791
187
2,061
6
94
1,286
3
97
2014-LA-792
2014-LA-793
25
2,890
2
98
2014-LA-794
24
159
25
75
2014-LA-795
95
2,167
45
55
2014-LA-796
8
185
26
74
2014-LA-797
28
3,513
29
71
0
0
0
13-155
2014-LA-800
51
316
25
75
2014-LA-801
85
953
60
40
2014-LA-804
91
1,464
3
97
2014-LA-805
217
10,365
9
91
2014-LA-806
15
272
48
52
Intercept for an ongoing homicide
investigation with pending
prosecution.
Subjects were believed to be
involved murders that occurred in
1992.
Interception confirmed narcotics
trafficking activity.
The subject discontinued using this
phone. The investigation is
ongoing.
The subject discontinued using this
phone. The investigation is
ongoing.
Interceptions led to the identification
of numerous sources of supply and
have resulted in the initiation of
additional federal investigations.
Subject(s) were believed to be
involved in a 1994 murder.
Subject believed to be using devices
to conduct narcotics trafficking
activities involving cocaine
methamphetamine, and marijuana.
The investigation is ongoing.
The subject discontinued using this
phone. The investigation is
ongoing.
During the interception, investigators
were able to learn about the
structure, members, and methods of
operation of this drug trafficking
organization (DTO).
The subject discontinued using this
phone. The investigation is
ongoing.
The subject discontinued using this
phone. The investigation is
ongoing.
The subject discontinued using this
phone. The investigation is
ongoing.
The subject discontinued using
these phones. The investigation is
ongoing.
12
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 4
Description of Communications Obtained and
Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Approximate No.
of Persons
Whose
Communications
Were Intercepted
Los Angeles
(cont’d)
2014-LA-807
36
2014-LA-808
Total No. of
Communications
Intercepted
Nature & Frequency
(Penal Code 629.62(9))
Incriminating
Communications
(%)
Other
Communications
(%)
456
17
83
0
0
0
0
2014-LA-809
87
6,426
15
85
2014-LA-810
46
711
36
64
2014-LA-811
162
2
19
81
2014-LA-812
62
3,137
46
53
2014-LA-813
6
67
30
70
2014-LA-814
3
206
7
93
2014-LA-815
36
1,278
13
87
2014-LA-816
29
1,291
18
82
2014-LA-817
0
4
0
100
2014-LA-818
78
3,052
4
96
Comments on Usefulness of
Intercept 3
Interceptions from wiretap 14-85
contributed to the arrest of one
person and the seizure of
2 kilograms of heroin.
The subjects discontinued using this
phone. The investigation is
ongoing.
Based on the intercepted calls
obtained as a result of this wiretap,
narcotics and narcotic proceeds
were seized and six individuals have
been identified for future criminal
charges. The investigation is
ongoing.
See 2014-LA-809.
Investigation into the trafficking of
methamphetamine from Mexico into
California. The results of the five
month long wiretap investigation
resulted in seizure of: 600 pounds
of methamphetamine, 1 million
dollars, 16 arrests (four more
pending) and five seized vehicles.
Other than the four currently
convicted on federal charges, the
remaining individuals have been or
are being filed on for state charges
involving the transportation of
methamphetamine.
Investigation has led to the
identification of additional coconspirators, tracking methods, and
the initiation of additional federal
investigations.
No significant enforcement activity
during this 30-day period.
This wiretap helped identify
additional members within the
organization, including a possible
source of supply.
Interceptions led to the identification
of narcotics traffickers operating in
Los Angeles County and their
methods used to traffic narcotics
into and through the United States.
The investigation is ongoing.
The subject is using multiple
phones. The investigation is
ongoing.
No significant enforcement activity
during this 30-day period.
No significant enforcement activity
during this 30 day period.
13
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 4
Description of Communications Obtained and
Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Approximate No.
of Persons
Whose
Communications
Were Intercepted
Los Angeles
(cont’d)
2014-LA-820
116
2014-LA-821
Total No. of
Communications
Intercepted
Nature & Frequency
(Penal Code 629.62(9))
Incriminating
Communications
(%)
Other
Communications
(%)
4,688
12
88
32
1,793
12
88
2014-LA-822
110
7,887
2014-LA-823
626
19,747
3
97
2014-LA-824
0
2
0
0
2014-LA-825
70
319
3
97
2014-LA-826
61
11,894
40
60
2014-LA-827
12
208
4
96
2014-LA-828
14
774
8
92
2014-LAS-6
1
131
0
100
2014-LA-829
36
712
35
65
2014-LA-831
62
3,137
47
53
Comments on Usefulness of
Intercept 3
The subject discontinued using this
phone. The investigation is
ongoing.
The intercepted communications
over 14-26 have assisted
investigators identify other phone
numbers and individuals engaged in
the distribution of narcotics.
Investigators will continue to
investigate these phone numbers
and indivduals in order to identify
and dismantle this Southern
California based narcotics trafficking
network.
Subjects involved in a conspiracy to
commit murder. The investigation is
ongoing and arrests are imminent.
The subject discontinued using this
phone. The investigation is
ongoing.
Subject was involved in a
conspiracy to commit murder. The
investigation is ongoing and arrests
are imminent.
The wiretap assisted in the
disruption of a drug trafficking
organization (DTO). It also led to
the seizure of $33,500 in narcotic
proceeds, 3,710.8 grams of
methamphetamine, 568.7 grams of
cocaine, and 5.4 grams of crack
cocaine. The investigation also led
to the arrest of six subjects.
Subject is involved in the murders
that occurred in 2012 and 2013.
No significant enforcement activity
during this 30-day period.
This wiretap was to help identify
additional members within the
organization, including a possible
source of supply.
Interceptions have identified multiple
narcotics distributors and sources of
supply and additional federal
investigations are ongoing.
Interceptions have led to the
identification of additional coconspirators, trafficking methods,
and the initiation of additional
federal investigations.
14
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 4
Description of Communications Obtained and
Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Approximate No.
of Persons
Whose
Communications
Were Intercepted
Los Angeles
(cont’d)
2014-LA-832
61
2014-LA-833
Total No. of
Communications
Intercepted
Nature & Frequency
(Penal Code 629.62(9))
Incriminating
Communications
(%)
Other
Communications
(%)
2,449
80
20
109
8,850
37
63
2014-LA-834
181
5,647
68
32
2014-LA-835
94
1,965
40
60
2014-LA-836
1
131
0
100
2014-LA-838
32
1,653
8
92
2014-LA-839
54
1,336
36
64
2014-LA-840
28
3,513
29
71
2014-LA-841
28
166
6
94
2014-LA-842
0
3,986
8
92
2014-LA-843
0
0
0
100
2014-LA-844
77
1
0
100
2014-LA-845
39
626
9
93
2014-LA-847
0
3
0
100
Comments on Usefulness of
Intercept 3
See 2014-LA-826.
Interception led to intelligence
regarding a larger DTO associated
with these subjects.
The interceptions on this cell phone
enabled investigators to determine
the scope of involvement of the
subject and identify other subjects
that would have a more substantial
impact on the DTO if intercepted
and apprehended.
The intercepted communications
allowed investigators to further
identify the sources of supply for
narcotics entering the United States
from Mexico and additional
distribution points within Los
Angeles.
The wiretap was to help identify
additional members within the
organization, including a possible
source of supply.
Interception led to intelligence
regarding a larger DTO associated
with this subject.
This interception has led to eight
additional suspects. The
investigation is ongoing.
Phones used to conduct narcotics
trafficking activities involving
cocaine, methamphetamine, and
marijuana. The investigation is
ongoing.
Wiretap provided crucial information
into the trafficking habits and
activities of the DTO as well as
information on additional DTO
members.
No criminal charges resulted from
the interceptions obtained to this
intercept (wiretap) order.
See 2014-LA-811.
No significant enforcement activity
during this 30-day period.
No pertinent interception made.
Phone appeared to be inactive.
Case is still active.
15
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 4
Description of Communications Obtained and
Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Approximate No.
of Persons
Whose
Communications
Were Intercepted
Los Angeles
(cont’d)
2014-LA-848
163
2014-LA-849
Total No. of
Communications
Intercepted
Nature & Frequency
(Penal Code 629.62(9))
Incriminating
Communications
(%)
Other
Communications
(%)
1,792
11
89
60
571
18
82
2014-LA-850
59
3,224
2
98
2014-LA-851
63
5,324
84
16
2014-LA-852
36
2,869
59
41
2014-LA-853
70
4,898
5
95
2014-LA-854
1
0
0
100
2014-LA-855
69
2,928
10
90
2014-LA-856
25
0
0
100
2014-LA-857
133
28,323
7
93
2014-LA-858
279
24,677
10
90
Comments on Usefulness of
Intercept 3
Primary of target telephone
identified, located, and arrested on
federal indictment. Case is still
active.
Seizure of 7 kilograms of heroin and
forfeiture of vehicle with man-made
hidden compartments (Traps).
Case is still active.
Subject was involved in a
conspiracy to commit murder. The
investigation is ongoing and arrests
are imminent.
During the course of this wiretap
investigators seized 34 pounds of
methamphetamine and have
identified numerous other subjects
invovled in smuggling large amounts
of cocaine, methamphetamine, and
heroin into the United States and the
Los Angeles area.
The intercepted communications
allowed investigators to further
identify the supplier of narcotics
entering the United States from
Mexico and subjects that were
transporting narcotics from Mexico
into Los Angeles area.
Subject was involved in a
conspiracy to commit murder and
gang related activity. The wiretap
assisted in solving the murder,
investigation is ongoing, and arrests
are imminent.
Subject discontinued use of both
phones before any law enforcement
action could be taken.
Based on wiretap intercepts, agents
were able to ascertain the wire
subject was sending bulk currency
to Mexico. Agents were able to
intercept and seize $28,178 in
narcotic proceeds.
Interceptions identified multiple
cocaine and methamphetamine
couriers.
Cases have been submitted to the
District Attorney's Office for filing.
Subject was involved in a
conspiracy to commit murder. The
investigation is ongoing, and arrests
are imminent.
16
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 4
Description of Communications Obtained and
Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
Los Angeles
(contd)
EICOS No.
Approximate No.
of Persons
Whose
Communications
Were Intercepted
Total No. of
Communications
Intercepted
Nature & Frequency
(Penal Code 629.62(9))
Incriminating
Communications
(%)
Other
Communications
(%)
2014-LA-859
712
38,882
7
93
2014-LA-860
27
1,406
65
35
2014-LA-861
146
7,574
8
92
2014-LA-862
45
760
44
56
2014-LA-863
45
5,847
6
94
2014-LA-864
75
10,430
4
96
2014-LA-866
11
79
1
99
2014-LA-867
163
1,792
11
89
2014-LA-868
26
76
51
49
2014-LA-869
15
0
0
100
2014-LA-870
73
3,002
13
87
2014-LAS-7
205
2,700
38
62
2014-LA-871
85
2,394
3
97
Comments on Usefulness of
Intercept 3
Subject was involved in a
conspiracy to commit murder and
gang related activity. The wiretap
assisted in solving the murder,
investigation is ongoing, and arrests
are imminent.
Interceptions indentified a source of
supply which led to an additional
federal investigation.
Subjects were involved in a
conspiracy to commit murder. The
wiretap assisted investigators in
solving this murder investigation.
Arrests are pending.
No seizures have been made.
With the help of the electronic
interceptions, investigators are able
to compile enough evidence to
submit the case to the District
Attorney's Office for filing.
With the help of the electronic
interceptions, investigators are able
to compile enough evidence to
submit the case to the District
Attorney's Office for filing.
Identified a Transnational Criminal
Organization (TCO) and Targets of
Influence (TOI) in Los Angeles
County supplying narcotics to gangs
in Southern and Central California.
Primary subject identified, located,
and arrested on unrelated federal
indictment. Case is still active.
Interceptions identified multiple
cocaine and methamphetamine
couriers and and an additional
cellular phone used by the subject.
The interceptions led to the arrest of
five individuals and the seizures of
4 kilograms of cocaine, and
$121,485 in narcotic proceeds. The
investigation is ongoing.
This was an emergency wiretap to
prevent a possible murder.
Identified a Transnational Criminal
Organization (TCO) and Targets of
Influence (TOI) in Los Angeles
County supplying narcotics to gangs
in Southern and Central California.
No significant enforcement acitivity
during this 30-day period.
17
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 4
Description of Communications Obtained and
Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
Los Angeles
(cont’d)
Madera
EICOS No.
Approximate No.
of Persons
Whose
Communications
Were Intercepted
Total No. of
Communications
Intercepted
Nature & Frequency
(Penal Code 629.62(9))
Incriminating
Communications
(%)
Other
Communications
(%)
2014-LAS-8
113
5,058
76
24
2014-LA-872
0
862
27
73
2014-LA-873
11
445
9
91
2014-LA-874
12
181
1
99
2014-LA-876
92
5,463
7
93
2014-LA-877
75
3,905
4
96
2014-LA-878
25
500
11
89
2014-LA-879
274
8,583
6
94
2014-LA-880
46
7,819
29
71
2014-LA-881
1
4,941
99
1
2014-LA-883
42
226
35
65
2014-LA-884
55
1,437
18
82
Comments on Usefulness of
Intercept 3
Interceptions directly led to the
arrest of three (3) individuals, the
seizure of 5 pounds of
methamphetamine, 1.5 kilograms of
cocaine, $25,379 in narcotic
proceeds, and two vehicles.
This case is ongoing due to the
arrest made of associates of the
primary target. The subject is no
longer using the phone.
This was a beneficial interception
period. Agents intercepted possible
sources of methamphetamine and
cocaine generating new leads in the
investigation. The case is ongoing.
No seizures were made based on
the interceptions of TT#1. The
subject did not utilize TT#1 after the
initial interception of the Target
Telephone.
No arrests related to wiretap; case is
still active.
No arrests related to the wiretap;
case is still active.
Identified a Transnational Criminal
Organization (TCO) and Targets of
Influence (TOI) in Los Angeles
County supplying narcotics to gangs
in Southern and Central California.
No arrests related to wiretap; case is
still active.
See 2014-LA-826.
This wiretap was used to investigate
an unsolved murder and other
crimes committed by members of a
violent criminal street gang. The
information will assist in identifying
the persons responsible for this
crime.
2014-MAD-5
92
957
25
75
The intercept provided information
regarding a drug trafficking
organization transporting
methamphetamine up from Mexico
to distribute in Madera County.
2014-MAD-7
95
2,174
18
82
See 2014-MAD-7.
2014-MAD-8
37
282
27
73
See 2014-MAD-7.
2014-MAD-9
53
462
18
82
See 2014-MAD-7.
18
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 4
Description of Communications Obtained and
Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Approximate No.
of Persons
Whose
Communications
Were Intercepted
Madera
(cont’d)
2014-MAD-10
65
2014-MAD-12
Total No. of
Communications
Intercepted
Nature & Frequency
(Penal Code 629.62(9))
Comments on Usefulness of
Intercept 3
Incriminating
Communications
(%)
Other
Communications
(%)
660
7
93
See 2014-MAD-7.
58
442
24
76
See 2014-MAD-7.
2014-MAD-13
35
229
46
54
See 2014-MAD-7.
2014-MAD-15
21
205
22
78
See 2014-MAD-7.
Merced
2014-MER-27
1,060
54,058
Napa
2014-NA-1
2
16
0
100
Orange
2014-OR-86
5
709
36
64
2014-OR-87
36
78
4
96
2014-OR-88
21
202
10
90
Placer
2014-PLA-3
39
493
31
69
Placer
(cont’d)
2014-PLA-4
19
555
11
89
Riverside
2013-RIV-899
0
2013-RIV-902
0
2013-RIV-904
0
2013-RIV-905
0
This was a major operation targeting
criminal street gang members and
their associates in Merced County
who were trafficking narcotics.
This intercept was obtained to
investigate a murder. No
incriminating conversations were
obtained, and after five days, the
operation was shut down.
The intercepts provided valuable
assistance in developing probable
cause to arrest two individuals for
murder. These individuals have
since been charged with the raping
and murdering of four people.
The interceptions resulted in the
arrest of one individual for murder.
The investigation is ongoing.
The interceptions led to the arrest of
one individual for murder. The
investigation is ongoing.
Wiretap was extremely useful and
instrumental in solving a cold case
homicide. The information on the
wire corroborated other evidence
and provided admissions to the
homicide. Without the wiretap, this
case would have remained
unsolved. The wire also allowed us
to pinpoint the suspects' location for
easy apprehension once probable
cause was established for an arrest
warrant. This minimizing risk to law
enforcement and others. Four
defendants are in custody facing a
murder charge.
See 2014-PLA-4.
19
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 4
Description of Communications Obtained and
Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Approximate No.
of Persons
Whose
Communications
Were Intercepted
Riverside
(cont’d)
2013-RIV-906
49
2013-RIV-911
11
2013-RIV-915
Total No. of
Communications
Intercepted
Nature & Frequency
(Penal Code 629.62(9))
Incriminating
Communications
(%)
Other
Communications
(%)
1,807
23
77
163
1
99
No significant events.
0
2013-RIV-916
23
617
21
79
2013-RIV-922
54
518
7
93
2013-RIV-925
36
3,006
8
92
20
80
2013-RIV-926
0
2013-RIV-927
0
2013-RIV-928
Comments on Usefulness of
Intercept 3
56
2013-RIV-929
4,534
As a result of this wiretap
interception order, $19,100 in
narcotic proceeds was seized.
This wiretap interception order was
used to help identify the user's
source of supply.
0
2013-RIV-930
219
6,729
30
70
2013-RIV-931
178
13,786
3
97
2013-RIV-932
105
1,056
8
92
7
93
As a result of this wiretap
interception, 46 pounds of
methamphetamine and 11 kilograms
of cocaine were seized.
As a result of this wiretap
interception order, $4 million in
narcotic proceeds along with 22
kilograms of cocaine and 10
kilograms of heroin were seized.
2013-RIV-933
0
2013-RIV-934
0
2013-RIV-935
19
2013-RIV-936
302
0
2013-RIV-937
168
16,543
6
94
2013-RIV-938
282
5,848
5
95
25
75
2013-RIV-939
2013-RIV-940
0
77
3,612
2013-RIV-941
40
697
63
37
2013-RIV-942
21
564
7
93
This wiretap interception order led to
an arrest of one individual and the
seizure of 10 pounds of
methamphetamine.
20
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 4
Description of Communications Obtained and
Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
Riverside
(cont’d)
EICOS No.
Approximate No.
of Persons
Whose
Communications
Were Intercepted
Total No. of
Communications
Intercepted
Nature & Frequency
(Penal Code 629.62(9))
Incriminating
Communications
(%)
Other
Communications
(%)
2013-RIV-943
118
2,837
26
74
2013-RIV-944
87
832
28
72
2013-RIV-945
417
13,174
5
95
2013-RIV-946
123
10,206
17
83
2013-RIV-947
Comments on Usefulness of
Intercept 3
Traffic interdiction led to seizure of
$3.7 million, which was hidden in
interior gas tanks. Two were
arrested and 1 kilogram of cocaine
was also seized.
During the investigation and wiretap
interception, investigators learned
about methods of operation, the
drug trafficking organization (DTO)
membership and stash locations
associated with this DTO.
As a result of this wiretap
interception order, investigators
were able to seize $17,000 in
narcotic proceeds and a ½ pound of
heroin.
This wiretap investigation assisted in
the identification of co-conspirators
within the drug trafficking
organization.
0
2013-RIV-948
8
1,370
4
96
2013-RIV-949
2
9
0
100
2013-RIV-950
4
102
5
95
2013-RIV-951
0
6
0
100
2013-RIV-952
118
1,360
17
83
2013-RIV-954
0
2013-RIV-955
0
These subjects discontinued use of
their phones during the
interceptions; investigation is
ongoing.
The subjects discontinued use of
their phones during this wiretap
interception investigation.
As a result of this wiretap
interception order, $800,000 in
narcotic proceeds was seized, as
well as 22 kilograms of cocaine and
10 kilograms of heroin.
2013-RIV-956
0
0
0
0
2014-RIV-957
269
2,763
5
95
2014-RIV-958
21
870
7
93
Target telephone intercepts led to
the identification of the supply
source.
2014-RIV-959
121
12,829
4
96
No results to report.
2014-RIV-960
16
728
14
86
21
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 4
Description of Communications Obtained and
Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
Riverside
(cont’d)
EICOS No.
Approximate No.
of Persons
Whose
Communications
Were Intercepted
Total No. of
Communications
Intercepted
Nature & Frequency
(Penal Code 629.62(9))
Incriminating
Communications
(%)
Other
Communications
(%)
2014-RIV-961
99
1,851
9
91
2014-RIV-962
400
14,473
24
76
2014-RIV-963
194
5,932
40
60
2014-RIV-964
5
386
7
93
2014-RIV-965
249
1,326
5
95
2014-RIV-966
26
860
52
48
2014-RIV-967
28
3,939
7
93
2014-RIV-968
5
342
62
38
2014-RIV-969
87
2,918
15
85
2014-RIV-970
16
152
80
20
2014-RIV-971
39
5,313
25
75
2014-RIV-972
0
2014-RIV-973
0
2014-RIV-974
0
2014-RIV-975
59
35,720
22
78
2014-RIV-976
24
1,403
33
67
Comments on Usefulness of
Intercept 3
The following were seized as a
result of this wiretap interception
order: 5 kilograms of cocaine,
6 pounds of heroin, 6 pounds of
methamphetamine, and $24,000 in
narcotic proceeds.
During this wiretap interception
order, agents seized 2 kilograms of
heroin and 14 firearms, and made
one arrest.
During this wiretap interception,
agents identified additional drug
trafficking organization members
(DTO), stash locations, and
methods of operation.
Investigation is pending.
Additional target telephones are
currently being intercepted to further
investigate this Mexico-based drug
trafficking organization (DTO).
Interceptions from this wiretap order
resulted in identification of coconspirators to the DTO.
As a result of this wiretap
interception order, investigators
were able to seize 54 kilograms of
cocaine and made five arrests;
investigation is ongoing and any
prosecution is pending. Subject
also discontinued use of phone
during the interception.
No significant events; investigation
is ongoing.
As a result of this wire interception,
43 kilograms of cocaine and
$1,157,010 were seized.
As a result of this wiretap
interception order, agents seized 52
pounds of methamphetamine and
$11,000. Three arrests are pending
prosecution.
22
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 4
Description of Communications Obtained and
Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Approximate No.
of Persons
Whose
Communications
Were Intercepted
Riverside
(cont’d)
2014-RIV-977
94
2014-RIV-980
Total No. of
Communications
Intercepted
Nature & Frequency
(Penal Code 629.62(9))
Comments on Usefulness of
Intercept 3
Incriminating
Communications
(%)
Other
Communications
(%)
3,009
12
88
As a result of this wire interception,
8.5 pounds of methamphetamine
was seized.
4
1,107
0
100
No significant events to report
2014-RIV-981
11
730
11
89
2014-RIV-982
7
1,042
3
97
2014-RIV-983
61
2,239
17
83
2014-RIV-984
18
1,220
15
85
2014-RIV-985
46
450
2014-RIV-986
0
2014-RIV-987
0
2014-RIV-988
0
As a result of this wire interception,
$133,500 in narcotic proceeds was
seized.
77
23
As a result of this wiretap
interception order, agents were able
to identify the customer base as well
as a Mexico-based narcotics cell
head. Interceptions assisted in
locating and identifying a second
subject and telephone numbers of
couriers.
No significant events to report.
2014-RIV-989
32
253
43
57
2014-RIV-990
67
1,793
20
80
2014-RIV-991
161
5,814
15
85
2014-RIV-992
59
2,752
5
95
2014-RIV-993
217
7,388
10
90
2014-RIV-994
17
6,255
65
35
2014-RIV-995
17
396
32
68
This interception order assisted law
enforcement agents to learn the
identity and roles of other coconspirators and the hierarchy of the
drug trafficking organization.
As a result of this wire interception
order, two subjects were arrested,
and 1.5 pounds of cocaine and
$21,810 in narcotic proceeds were
seized.
As a result of this wire interception,
9.8 kilograms of cocaine was
seized.
Based off of this wiretap interception
order, it was found that the primary
user of the phone was going to
facilitate a shipment of narcotics
from Mexico to U.S. However, the
intercept expired prior to receiving
any further details of the narcotic
transition.
23
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 4
Description of Communications Obtained and
Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Approximate No.
of Persons
Whose
Communications
Were Intercepted
Riverside
(cont’d)
2014-RIV-996
19
2013-RIV-997
Total No. of
Communications
Intercepted
Nature & Frequency
(Penal Code 629.62(9))
Incriminating
Communications
(%)
Other
Communications
(%)
379
52
48
47
499
24
76
2014-RIV-998
16
194
3
97
2014-RIV-999
736
21,326
14
86
11
89
2014-RIV-1000
2014-RIV-1001
Comments on Usefulness of
Intercept 3
No significant events to report;
investigation is ongoing.
0
37
2,031
2014-RIV-1002
0
2014-RIV-1003
0
2014-RIV-1004
0
1
0
100
No significant events to report.
2014-RIV-1005
56
2,619
8
92
As a result of this wire interception,
6 pounds of methamphetamine was
seized.
2014-RIV-1006
40
503
18
82
2014-RIV-1007
18
706
7
93
2014-RIV-1008
62
1,376
33
67
2014-RIV-1009
5,266
6,028
5
95
2014-RIV-1010
15
203
15
85
2014-RIV-1011
65
718
18
82
2014-RIV-1012
47
2014-RIV-1013
2014-RIV-1014
935
27
73
0
100
No seizures to report.
No significant events occurred over
the 30 days of interception.
Information from this wire led to
further surveillance and investigative
actions which resulted in the seizure
of 72 kilograms of cocaine from
another target.
During the interception, investigators
seized 55 pounds of
methamphetamine, 20 kilograms of
heroin, and $21,900 in narcotic
proceeds.
0
1
11
2014-RIV-1016
0
2014-RIV-1017
0
Installed - but not used.
2014-RIV-1018
81
3,763
17
83
2014-RIV-1019
8
59
22
77
During the wiretap interception,
investigators were able to seize
$45,000 in narcotic proceeds.
24
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 4
Description of Communications Obtained and
Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Approximate No.
of Persons
Whose
Communications
Were Intercepted
Riverside
(cont’d)
2014-RIV-1020
22
2014-RIV-1021
Total No. of
Communications
Intercepted
178
Nature & Frequency
(Penal Code 629.62(9))
Incriminating
Communications
(%)
Other
Communications
(%)
41
59
As a result of this wiretap
interception order, agents were able
to seize 13 kilograms of cocaine and
made one arrest.
0
2014-RIV-1022
46
4,135
28
72
2014-RIV-1023
15
412
17
83
2014-RIV-1024
102
1,563
5
95
2014-RIV-1025
4
211
20
80
2014-RIV-1026
0
1
0
100
2014-RIV-1027
19
410
80
20
2014-RIV-1028
1
118
0
100
2014-RIV-1029
35
2,851
11
89
2014-RIV-1030
163
2,509
38
62
2014-RIV-1031
139
3,522
12
88
2014-RIV-1032
3
374
6
94
2014-RIV-1033
108
1,268
19
81
2014-RIV-1034
30
183
40
60
33
67
2014-RIV-1035
2014-RIV-1036
Comments on Usefulness of
Intercept 3
During this wiretap intercept
investigation, three individuals were
arrested, 1 vehicle, 5 pounds of
methamphetamine, and $76,000 in
narcotic proceeds were seized.
The wiretap interception order led to
the seizure of 5 pounds of heroin,
and the identification of other coconspirators.
The wiretap interception order was
essential in identifying and
disrupting the drug trafficking
organization (DTO). Furthermore,
agents are able to dismantle the
structure of this DTO.
Installed - but not used.
As a result of this wire interception,
5,000 pounds of marijuana was
seized from the drug trafficking
organization (DTO).
This subject discontinued the use of
cell phone.
As a result of this wire interception,
138 kilgrams of cocaine was seized
from within exterior reservoir fuel
tanks, two people were arrested,
and the truck was seized.
As a result of this wire interception,
18 pounds of heroin was seized and
made one arrest.
During this investigation, agents
seized $500,000 in narcotic
proceeds and made one arrest.
0
49
960
As a result of this wire interception,
two persons arrested, and 10
pounds of methamphetamine
seized.
25
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 4
Description of Communications Obtained and
Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Approximate No.
of Persons
Whose
Communications
Were Intercepted
Riverside
(cont’d)
2014-RIV-1037
35
2014-RIV-1039
2014-RIV-1040
Total No. of
Communications
Intercepted
Nature & Frequency
(Penal Code 629.62(9))
Incriminating
Communications
(%)
Other
Communications
(%)
471
15
85
38
1,402
14
86
0
18
0
100
2014-RIV-1041
As a result of this wire interception,
four arrests made and 6 pounds of
methamphetamine seized.
During this wiretap interception
order, agents identified further coconspirators within the DTO along
with locations of stash houses and
methods of operation.
0
2014-RIV-1042
27
83
16
84
2014-RIV-1043
37
986
64
36
2014-RIV-1044
Federally Funded - No significant
events.
This particular wiretap interception
order led to seizures of 90 grams of
cocaine, 479 grams of marijuana,
and 5 grams of methamphetamine.
A search warrant served out-of-state
also uncovered and closed a drug
stash house.
0
2014-RIV-1045
91
8,273
20
80
2013-RIV-1046
98
2,020
5
95
2014-RIV-1047
1
1
0
100
2014-RIV-1048
15
163
25
75
2014-RIV-1049
36
59,257
39
61
2014-RIV-1050
79
3,489
30
70
2014-RIV-1051
4
490
10
90
2014-RIV-1052
47
2,242
16
84
2014-RIV-1053
129
4,619
18
82
2014-RIV-1054
Comments on Usefulness of
Intercept 3
326
2,409
21
79
As a result of this wire interception,
17 pounds of methamphetamine
and 5 pounds of heroin were seized.
As a result of this wire interception,
160 pounds of methamphetamine,
200 gallons of liquid
methamphetamine, and $850,000 in
narcotic proceeds were seized.
Intercepts provided additional
information regarding narcotics
customers and structure of the drug
trafficking organization (DTO).
As a result of this wire interception,
seizures included 7.7 kilograms of
heroin (China White), 20.79
kilograms of cocaine, and 8.55
kilograms of methamphetamine.
This target telephone was
terminated after 30 days.
Agents seized $6 million in narcotic
proceeds and made three arrests.
Interceptions also led to the
identification of others within the
DTO.
26
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 4
Description of Communications Obtained and
Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Approximate No.
of Persons
Whose
Communications
Were Intercepted
Total No. of
Communications
Intercepted
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Riverside
(cont’d)
2014-RIV-1055
0
2014-RIV-1056
0
2014-RIV-1057
0
Nature & Frequency
(Penal Code 629.62(9))
Incriminating
Communications
(%)
Other
Communications
(%)
2014-RIV-1058
65
1,134
26
74
2014-RIV-1059
81
9,023
1
99
2014-RIV-1060
5
48
58
42
2014-RIV-1061
25
1,479
2014-RIV-1062
0
2014-RIV-1063
0
4
96
2014-RIV-1064
22
7,745
23
77
2014-RIV-1065
18
940
9
91
2014-RIV-1066
25
4,683
3
97
2014-RIV-1068
50
1,054
18
82
2014-RIV-1070
During the course of this wiretap,
the primary user of the intercepted
telephone was arrested on narcotics
charges relating to the seizure of 4.3
kilograms of cocaine, 2.8 kilograms
of heroin, 13.1 kilograms of crystal
methamphetamine.
As a result of this wiretap
interception, 22 pounds of
methamphetamine was seized, and
one arrest made.
0
2014-RIV-1071
78
1,334
10
90
2014-RIV-1072
0
0
0
100
1
100
2014-RIV-1073
Cell phone interception ceased due
to line being dropped by target user.
0
2014-RIV-1074
0
0
2014-RIV-1076
2014-RIV-1078
As a result of this wiretap
interception, 11 kilograms of cocaine
and 5 pounds of methamphetamine
were seized.
No criminal charges resulted from
this wiretap interception order.
0
2014-RIV-1067
2014-RIV-1075
Comments on Usefulness of
Intercept 3
0
0
77
6,029
23
77
As a result of this wiretap
interception order, 20 pounds of
methamphetamine was seized and
four arrests were made. The case is
ongoing.
27
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 4
Description of Communications Obtained and
Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Riverside
(cont’d)
2014-RIV-1079
Approximate No.
of Persons
Whose
Communications
Were Intercepted
Total No. of
Communications
Intercepted
Nature & Frequency
(Penal Code 629.62(9))
Incriminating
Communications
(%)
Other
Communications
(%)
Comments on Usefulness of
Intercept 3
0
2014-RIV-1080
0
5
0
100
2013-RIV-1081
57
2,770
16
84
2014-RIV-1082
0
2014-RIV-1083
0
As a result of this wire interception,
agents seized 50 pounds of
methamphetamine.
2014-RIV-1084
10
2,058
11
89
2014-RIV-1085
298
21,486
15
85
2014-RIV-1086
77
3,654
14
86
2014-RIV-1087
4
881
5
95
2014-RIV-1088
118
9,769
7
93
2014-RIV-1089
103
3,882
5
95
2014-RIV-1090
320
2,063
5
95
2014-RIV-1091
24
23,278
10
90
See 2014-RIV-1049.
2014-RIV-1092
156
12,062
12
88
No results to report; investigation is
ongoing.
2014-RIV-1093
17
1,658
20
80
2014-RIV-1094
10
628
18
82
2014-RIV-1095
133
5,091
1
99
2014-RIV-1096
2,990
5,973
73
27
2014-RIV-1097
180
20,984
9
91
2014-RIV-1098
536
8,102
10
90
2014-RIV-1099
As a result of this wiretap
interception order, 5 kilograms of
heroin and $346,000 were seized.
This wiretap interception order
provided further intelligence to
federal counterparts in South
America concerning a large scale
cocaine smuggling organization.
0
2014-RIV-1100
7
50
62
38
2014-RIV-1101
228
6,632
22
78
2014-RIV-1102
95
1,903
10
90
As a result of this wiretap
interception order, agents seized
$620,000 in narcotic proceeds.
28
California Electronic Interceptions Report
2014-RIV-1103
50
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
1,980
15
85
As a result of this wiretap
interception order, 10 pounds of
heroin was seized and one person
was arrested.
29
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 4
Description of Communications Obtained and
Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Approximate No.
of Persons
Whose
Communications
Were Intercepted
Riverside
(cont’d)
2014-RIV-1104
50
2014-RIV-1106
2014-RIV-1108
Total No. of
Communications
Intercepted
Nature & Frequency
(Penal Code 629.62(9))
Incriminating
Communications
(%)
Other
Communications
(%)
1,893
6
94
214
10,896
5
95
33
1,224
14
86
2014-RIV-1109
Based on intercepted calls, three
suspects were arrested and
1 kilogram of cocaine and 1 stolen
gun were seized.
0
2014-RIV-1110
591
14,781
4
96
2014-RIV-1111
61
4,295
7
93
2014-RIV-1112
184
4,025
13
87
2014-RIV-1113
55
722
61
39
2014-RIV-1114
2
8
0
100
2014-RIV-1115
18
2,795
38
62
2014-RIV-1116
68
2,343
44
56
2014-RIV-1117
89
3,978
1
99
2014-RIV-1118
24
1,414
2
98
7
93
2014-RIV-1119
2014-RIV-1120
Comments on Usefulness of
Intercept 3
As a result of this wiretap
interception order, 21.3 kilograms of
cocaine and $161,400 were seized.
As a result of this wiretap
interception order, officers were able
to seize 5 pounds of
methamphetamine.
As a result of this wire interception,
$11,780 was seized along with 60
grams of methamphetamine.
As a result of this wire interception,
25 pounds of methamphetamine
was seized.
0
15
2014-RIV-1121
5,667
0
2014-RIV-1122
128
3,535
2
98
2014-RIV-1123
86
2,721
10
90
2014-RIV-1124
1
5
60
40
2014-RIV-1125
24
449
35
65
2014-RIV-1127
83
5,736
17
83
2014-RIV-1128
30
1,057
42
58
As a result of this wiretap
interception order, agents seized
$283,555 in narcotic proceeds.
Three people were arrested as a
result of this wiretap interception
order, and 12 pounds of
methamphetamine was seized.
As a result of this wire interception,
seizures included 1 kilogram of
cocaine and 1 stolen gun.
30
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 4
Description of Communications Obtained and
Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
Riverside
(cont’d)
EICOS No.
Approximate No.
of Persons
Whose
Communications
Were Intercepted
Total No. of
Communications
Intercepted
Nature & Frequency
(Penal Code 629.62(9))
Incriminating
Communications
(%)
Other
Communications
(%)
2014-RIV-1129
17
619
8
92
2014-RIV-1130
151
2,729
16
84
2014-RIV-1131
43
6,592
35
65
2013-RIV-1132
4
749
20
80
2014-RIV-1133
68
3,614
25
75
2013-RIV-1135
18
4,751
13
87
2014-RIV-1136
92
5,336
12
76
6
94
2014-RIV-1137
As a result of this wire interception,
$418,790 was seized.
As a result of this wire interception,
$35,492 was seized from subjects
traveling through multiple states
collecting narcotic proceeds.
0
35
2014-RIV-1139
2,066
0
2014-RIV-1141
178
5,866
35
65
2014-RIV-1142
332
528
17
83
2014-RIV-1143
11
74
43
57
2014-RIV-1144
2014-RIV-1145
Interceptions corroborated
information on target but illegal
activity was infrequent; no drugs or
money seized under this wiretap
order.
0
2014-RIV-1134
2014-RIV-1138
Comments on Usefulness of
Intercept 3
As a result of this wire interception,
4 pounds of methamphetamine was
seized and two arrests were made.
0
54
2014-RIV-1146
3,543
0
2014-RIV-1148
106
6,093
9
91
2014-RIV-1149
20
274
20
80
2014-RIV-1150
56
4,871
6
94
As a result of this wire interception,
33 kilograms of cocaine, 5 kilograms
of heroin, and 7 pounds of
methamphetamine were seized.
As a result of this wire interception,
11 pounds of heroin and $346,020
were seized.
30
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 4
Description of Communications Obtained and
Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
Riverside
(cont’d)
EICOS No.
Approximate No.
of Persons
Whose
Communications
Were Intercepted
Total No. of
Communications
Intercepted
Nature & Frequency
(Penal Code 629.62(9))
Incriminating
Communications
(%)
Other
Communications
(%)
2014-RIV-1151
29
1,251
21
79
2014-RIV-1152
0
0
0
0
2014-RIV-1153
48
1,541
78
22
2014-RIV-1154
199
7,075
24
76
2014-RIV-1155
93
1,786
16
84
2014-RIV-1157
0
29
0
100
2014-RIV-1158
44
944
9
91
2014-RIV-1160
32
300
6
94
2014-RIV-1161
0
4
0
0
2014-RIV-1162
51
2,895
4
96
2014-RIV-1163
0
7
0
100
2014-RIV-1164
39
1,696
3
97
2014-RIV-1165
71
2,231
28
72
2014-RIV-1166
4
87
3
97
2014-RIV-1167
116
4,475
22
78
2014-RIV-1168
2014-RIV-1170
A retail dealer was identified as a
result of this wiretap interception
order. Surveillance was conducted
at the residence and a search
warrant was also served, 100 grams
of methamphetamine, 2 firearms (1
stolen), and 9 pounds of marijuana
and marijuana wax were located.
Four subjects were arrested and are
pending prosecution
No calls were intercepted.
0
2014-RIV-1156
2014-RIV-1169
Comments on Usefulness of
Intercept 3
As a result of this wire interception,
agents seized 30 pounds of
methamphetamine.
No arrests or seizures were made
due to the brevity of this wiretap
interception; agents were only able
to monitor minimal phone activity.
As a result of this wire interception,
agents seized $109,980 from a drug
trafficking organization (DTO)
courier.
This wiretap interception order led to
the arrest of two suspects and the
seizure of $56,000 in narcotic
proceeds and 5 pounds of
marijuana.
0
3
101
19
81
Additional target telephones are
currently being intercepted to further
this investigation into drug trafficking
organization (DTO). See also 2014RIV-1049.
0
31
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 4
Description of Communications Obtained and
Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Approximate No.
of Persons
Whose
Communications
Were Intercepted
Riverside
(cont’d)
2014-RIV-1171
87
2014-RIV-1172
Total No. of
Communications
Intercepted
Nature & Frequency
(Penal Code 629.62(9))
Incriminating
Communications
(%)
Other
Communications
(%)
999
40
60
32
2,934
11
89
2014-RIV-1173
1
1
0
100
2014-RIV-1174
71
1,887
15
85
2014-RIV-1175
426
4,660
30
70
2013-RIV-1177
49
4,309
8
92
2014-RIV-1178
32
4,395
6
94
2014-RIV-1179
273
9,418
15
85
12
88
8
92
2014-RIV-1180
As a result of this wire interception,
agents seized 11 pounds of heroin.
0
9
2014-RIV-1182
2014-RIV-1183
As a result of this wire interception,
one arrest was made, and 10
pounds of methamphetamine was
seized.
0
2014-RIV-1176
2014-RIV-1181
Comments on Usefulness of
Intercept 3
1,068
0
149
2014-RIV-1184
2,037
0
This wiretap interception order led to
the seizure of 11 kilograms of
cocaine and 21 pounds of
methamphetamine.
As a result of this wire interception,
$208,300 in narcotic proceeds was
seized.
As a result of this wire interception,
numerous intercepted calls proved
the subject was directly involved in
the DTO and 5 pounds of heroin
was seized.
2014-RIV-1185
30
220
22
78
2014-RIV-1186
41
931
19
81
2014-RIV-1187
110
4,353
5
95
2014-RIV-1188
17
26,917
3
97
See 2014-RIV-1049.
2014-RIV-1190
813
10,700
8
92
As a result of this wire interception,
$70,000 in narcotic proceeds, 10 – 1
ounce gold bars, and one vehicle
were seized.
2014-RIV-1191
30
763
15
85
2014-RIV-1192
0
7
0
0
2014-RIV-1193
108
4,305
26
74
This wiretap interception order led to
the arrest of one person along with
the seizure of 343 grams of
methamphetamine.
32
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 4
Description of Communications Obtained and
Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Approximate No.
of Persons
Whose
Communications
Were Intercepted
Riverside
(cont’d)
2014-RIV-1194
87
2014-RIV-1195
Total No. of
Communications
Intercepted
Nature & Frequency
(Penal Code 629.62(9))
Incriminating
Communications
(%)
Other
Communications
(%)
5,076
55
45
0
0
0
0
2014-RIV-1196
54
8,672
5
95
2014-RIV-1197
64
1,406
7
93
2014-RIV-1198
67
8,787
60
40
2014-RIV-1199
15
10,282
26
74
2014-RIV-1200
Installed but not used - target
telephone accounts were closed for
non-payment.
0
2014-RIV-1201
82
3,583
27
73
2014-RIV-1202
100
2,519
15
85
2014-RIV-1203
0
0
0
0
2014-RIV-1204
As a result of this wire interception,
numerous calls involving narcotic
related trafficking were intercepted,
and 1 pound of methamphetamine
and $25,500 in narcotic proceeds
were seized.
0
2014-RIV-1205
14
3,867
1
99
2014-RIV-1206
97
4,813
15
85
2014-RIV-1207
152
3,254
4
96
2014-RIV-1208
132
12,802
19
81
2014-RIV-1209
53
1,051
35
65
2014-RIV-1210
0
42
0
100
2014-RIV-1211
31
1,391
49
51
2014-RIV-1212
15
251
82
18
2014-RIV-1213
113
1,348
47
53
2014-RIV-1214
Comments on Usefulness of
Intercept 3
38
29,138
42
58
As a result of this wire interception,
29 pounds of heroin and $20,000 in
narcotic proceeds were seized.
As a result of this wire interception,
10 kilograms of cocaine and 4
pounds of heroin were seized.
This wiretap interception order
resulted in the seizure of
undisclosed amount of narcotics and
additional intelligence which will be
utilized in disrupting the drug
trafficking organization (DTO).
33
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 4
Description of Communications Obtained and
Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
Riverside
(cont’d)
EICOS No.
Approximate No.
of Persons
Whose
Communications
Were Intercepted
Total No. of
Communications
Intercepted
Nature & Frequency
(Penal Code 629.62(9))
Incriminating
Communications
(%)
Other
Communications
(%)
2014-RIV-1215
84
10,581
12
88
2014-RIV-1216
101
5,435
10
90
2014-RIV-1217
141
323
13
87
2014-RIV-1218
83
3,878
62
24
2014-RIV-1219
Comments on Usefulness of
Intercept 3
As a result of this wire interception,
300 pounds of marijuana in a stash
house was seized, four suspects
were arrested and new subjects and
DTOs were identified.
This wiretap interception order
assisted detectives in further
identification of subjects involved in
murder and gang activity.
0
2014-RIV-1220
490
13,486
17
83
2014-RIV-1221
55
139
33
67
2014-RIV-1222
2
1,121
23
77
2014-RIV-1224
105
3,913
2
98
2014-RIV-1225
5
102
16
84
2014-RIV-1226
471
2,115
12
88
2014-RIV-1223
As a result of this wire interception,
$2,245,661 in narcotic proceeds
was seized.
0
2014-RIV-1227
0
2014-RIV-1229
48
6,501
11
89
2014-RIV-1231
189
6,500
17
83
2014-RIV-1232
14
100
25
75
2014-RIV-1233
149
5,406
3
97
2014-RIV-1234
As a result of this wire interception,
one arrest was made and 1 pound
of methamphetamine was seized.
As a result of this wire interception,
$20,000 in narcotic proceeds, 5.6
ounces of cocaine, and 2 firearms
were seized.
0
2014-RIV-1235
35
1,056
24
76
2014-RIV-1236
103
11,218
8
92
2014-RIV-1237
8
1,936
11
89
2014-RIV-1238
2
4,637
0
100
As a result of this wire interception,
20 kilograms of cocaine,11 pounds
of heroin, 5 pounds of
methamphetamine, and $39,000 in
narcotic proceeds were seized.
As a result of this wire interception,
one arrest was made, and 25
kilograms of cocaine was seized.
34
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 4
Description of Communications Obtained and
Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Approximate No.
of Persons
Whose
Communications
Were Intercepted
Riverside
(cont’d)
2014-RIV-1239
53
Total No. of
Communications
Intercepted
7,139
Nature & Frequency
(Penal Code 629.62(9))
Incriminating
Communications
(%)
Other
Communications
(%)
4
96
2014-RIV-1240
289
5,127
8
92
2014-RIV-1241
100
26,480
17
83
2014-RIV-1242
As a result of this wire interception,
one arrest was made and 12.5
pounds of methamphetamine and
244 pounds of marijuana were
seized.
0
2014-RIV-1243
174
3,252
13
87
2014-RIV-1244
111
5,119
7
93
2014-RIV-1245
6
223
80
20
30
70
2014-RIV-1246
2014-RIV-1247
Comments on Usefulness of
Intercept 3
0
6
2014-RIV-1248
80
0
2014-RIV-1249
107
2,392
22
78
2014-RIV-1250
51
1,693
7
93
2014-RIV-1251
35
2,048
25
75
2014-RIV-1252
59
255
16
84
2014-RIV-1253
8
32
34
66
2014-RIV-1254
617
3,452
10
90
2014-RIV-1255
8
38
58
42
2014-RIV-1256
496
9,946
18
82
2014-RIV-1257
15
545
7
93
2014-RIV-1258
0
2014-RIV-1259
0
2014-RIV-1260
0
2014-RIV-1261
22
1,608
10
90
2014-RIV-1262
122
2,153
7
93
2014-RIV-1263
41
24,031
42
58
As a result of this wire interception,
$100,000 in narcotic proceeds was
seized.
As a result of this wire interception,
$180,000 in narcotic proceeds and
12 pounds of heroin were seized.
As a result of this wire interception,
agents were able to further identify
all suspects and subjects involved in
the murder with additional gang
affiliation admissions.
See 2014-RIV-1049.
35
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 4
Description of Communications Obtained and
Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Approximate No.
of Persons
Whose
Communications
Were Intercepted
Total No. of
Communications
Intercepted
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Riverside
(cont’d)
2014-RIV-1264
0
2014-RIV-1265
0
2014-RIV-1266
67
2014-RIV-1267
2,115
Nature & Frequency
(Penal Code 629.62(9))
Incriminating
Communications
(%)
Other
Communications
(%)
17
83
Comments on Usefulness of
Intercept 3
0
2014-RIV-1268
26
2,357
30
70
2014-RIV-1269
108
7,818
13
87
2014-RIV-1270
19
2,065
15
85
2014-RIV-1271
0
4
0
100
2014-RIV-1272
31
3,719
15
85
2014-RIV-1273
As a result of this wire interception,
18 kilograms of cocaine and 16
kilograms of heroin were seized.
0
2014-RIV-1275
37
5,273
12
88
2014-RIV-1276
89
3,392
21
79
2014-RIV-1277
305
18,395
15
85
2014-RIV-1278
103
4,195
13
87
2014-RIV-1280
As a result of this wire interception,
numerous narcotic trafficking related
calls were intercepted, two search
warrants were served and $20,741
in suspected drug proceeds was
seized along with 2 firearms and
5.6 ounces of cocaine. One person
was arrested on drug trafficking
related charges.
0
2014-RIV-1281
34
534
37
63
2014-RIV-1282
0
0
0
100
2014-RIV-1283
59
2,591
10
90
2014-RIV-1284
11
5,155
10
90
2014-RIV-1285
205
4,153
11
89
2014-RIV-1286
0
2014-RIV-1287
18
220
80
20
2014-RIV-1288
113
219
38
62
This wiretap interception order led to
the seizure of 7 pounds of
methamphetamine and the arrest of
two subjects.
36
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 4
Description of Communications Obtained and
Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Approximate No.
of Persons
Whose
Communications
Were Intercepted
Riverside
(cont’d)
2014-RIV-1289
315
2014-RIV-1290
2014-RIV-1291
Nature & Frequency
(Penal Code 629.62(9))
Incriminating
Communications
(%)
Other
Communications
(%)
4,027
28
72
163
7,741
45
55
0
0
4
96
2014-RIV-1292
2014-RIV-1293
Total No. of
Communications
Intercepted
9
276
Interceptions from this wiretap order
resulted in the seizure of $20,000 in
narcotic proceeds.
0
2013-RIV-1295
65
7,534
37
63
2014-RIV-1296
1
10
10
90
2014-RIV-1297
13
77
32
68
2014-RIV-1298
79
2,781
11
89
2014-RIV-1299
9
86
86
14
102
2014-RIV-1301
1,372
17
83
As a result of this wiretap
interception, a search warrant was
subsequently served.
Methamphetamine and heroin were
seized and the subject was arrested
and released pending further
investigation and prosecution.
0
2014-RIV-1302
156
7,227
30
70
2014-RIV-1303
9
703
25
75
2014-RIV-1304
0
2014-RIV-1305
48
496
36
64
2014-RIV-1306
1
2
0
100
2014-RIV-1307
12
362
7
93
46
54
2014-RIV-1308
2014-RIV-1309
As a result of this wire interception,
agents were able to seize
$1.16 million in narcotic proceeds.
As a result of this wire interception,
$71,879 and 2 kilograms of cocaine
were seized and two arrests were
made.
Installed but not used, no calls were
intercepted.
0
2014-RIV-1294
2014-RIV-1300
Comments on Usefulness of
Intercept 3
0
42
15,964
2014-RIV-1310
0
2014-RIV-1311
0
2014-RIV-1312
0
See 2014-RIV-1049.
37
California Electronic Interceptions Report
2014-RIV-1313
18
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
132
10
90
38
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 4
Description of Communications Obtained and
Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Approximate No.
of Persons
Whose
Communications
Were Intercepted
Riverside
(cont’d)
2014-RIV-1315
24
2014-RIV-1316
Total No. of
Communications
Intercepted
Nature & Frequency
(Penal Code 629.62(9))
Comments on Usefulness of
Intercept 3
Incriminating
Communications
(%)
Other
Communications
(%)
1,466
32
68
67
8,468
40
60
2014-RIV-1317
655
2,921
17
83
2014-RIV-1319
11
1,464
1
99
2014-RIV-1320
142
3,283
15
85
As a result of this wire interception,
21.74 grams of methamphetamine
was seized.
2014-RIV-1321
0
0
2014-RIV-1322
196
8,264
5
95
As a result of this wire interception,
communications assisted with
surveillance operations and led to
narcotic seizures and arrests.
81
As a result of this wire interception,
two arrests were made and the
seizure of 2.5 pounds of
methamphetamine, 2 pounds of
cocaine, $46,400 in narcotic
proceeds, and 6 guns.
2014-RIV-1323
2014-RIV-1324
0
156
2014-RIV-1326
2014-RIV-1327
As a result of this wire interception,
additional subjects and the drug
trafficking organization’s structure
were identified.
As a result of this wire interception,
$1.2 million in narcotic proceeds,
5 vehicles, and gold valued at
$79,650 were seized.
4,279
19
0
0
2014-RIV-1328
Installed but not used, subject
dumped phone.
0
0
2014-RIV-1329
209
7,576
15
85
2014-RIV-1330
73
1,096
16
84
2014-RIV-1331
0
2014-RIV-1332
560
3,707
5
95
2014-RIV-1333
0
11
0
100
2014-RIV-1334
5
2,023
7
93
2014-RIV-1335
As a result of this wire interception,
$210,698 in narcotic proceeds and
8 firearms were seized.
0
2014-RIV-1336
48
3,585
30
70
2014-RIV-1337
22
103
52
48
39
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 4
Description of Communications Obtained and
Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Approximate No.
of Persons
Whose
Communications
Were Intercepted
Riverside
(cont’d)
2014-RIV-1338
33
2014-RIV-1339
Total No. of
Communications
Intercepted
Nature & Frequency
(Penal Code 629.62(9))
Comments on Usefulness of
Intercept 3
Incriminating
Communications
(%)
Other
Communications
(%)
2,470
12
88
115
3,365
7
93
2014-RIV-1340
23
2,679
14
86
2014-RIV-1341
30
444
54
46
2014-RIV-1342
18
512
30
70
Additional subjects and DTO were
identified; no arrests or seizures
were made.
2014-RIV-1343
142
3,283
15
85
See 2014-RIV-1320.
2014-RIV-1344
78
23,191
20
80
2014-RIV-1345
113
82,272
9
91
2014-RIV-1346
37
976
26
74
As a result of this wire interception,
1 pound of marijuana and $36,805
in narcotic proceeds were seized.
53
47
As a result of this wire interception,
agents seized 908 grams of
methamphetamine and 136 grams
of marijuana.
2014-RIV-1347
2014-RIV-1348
As a result of this wire interception,
agents seized 26 pounds of
methamphetamine and 3 kilograms
of cocaine.
This wiretap interception order was
necessary to investigate a Mexicobased drug trafficking organization
(DTO). Intel was gained for a future
enforcement action which will
disrupt the DTO.
As a result of this wire interception,
three people were arrested and
86 pounds of methamphetamine
was seized.
0
62
1,378
2014-RIV-1349
0
2014-RIV-1350
0
2014-RIV-1351
109
1,944
18
82
2014-RIV-1352
7
116
49
51
2014-RIV-1353
102
4,156
14
86
2014-RIV-1354
37
2,988
8
92
As a result of this wire interception,
5.6 pounds of methamphetamine
and $101,095 were seized.
One subject was arrested. See
2014-RIV-1320.
2014-RIV-1355
0
2014-RIV-1356
0
2014-RIV-1357
8
556
34
66
2014-RIV-1358
10
119
51
49
As a result of this wire interception,
$160,012 in narcotic proceeds was
seized.
40
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 4
Description of Communications Obtained and
Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Approximate No.
of Persons
Whose
Communications
Were Intercepted
Riverside
(cont’d)
2014-RIV-1359
2
2014-RIV-1360
Total No. of
Communications
Intercepted
Nature & Frequency
(Penal Code 629.62(9))
Incriminating
Communications
(%)
Other
Communications
(%)
3
0
100
113
2,573
60
40
2014-RIV-1361
23
204
7
93
2014-RIV-1362
159
1,753
27
73
2014-RIV-1363
200
8,847
5
95
2014-RIV-1364
611
35,139
20
80
2014-RIV-1365
143
2,437
12
88
2014-RIV-1366
260
6,163
15
85
2014-RIV-1367
Comments on Usefulness of
Intercept 3
This target telephone was used
sparingly; no incriminating
interceptions.
As a result of this wiretap
interception order, $221,000 in
narcotic proceeds was seized.
As a result of this wire interception,
agents were able to seize $300,000
in narcotic proceeds.
As a result of this wire interception,
$505,880, $42,100, $60,000 and
$25,000 in narcotic proceeds were
seized at various locations.
As a result of this wire interception,
numerous calls involving narcotics
trafficking were discussed at length
and 27.7 pounds of
methamphetamine, 3 pounds of
black tar heroin, 2 firearms, and
$7,791 in suspected drug proceeds
were seized from residences and
traffic stops.
0
2014-RIV-1368
65
4,075
25
75
2014-RIV-1369
238
3,324
7
93
2014-RIV-1370
28
3,464
27
73
2014-RIV-1371
100
1,996
2014-RIV-1372
18
553
33
67
2014-RIV-1373
379
10,693
20
80
2014-RIV-1374
39
41,344
37
63
2014-RIV-1375
12
352
14
86
2014-RIV-1376
711
4,967
20
80
Information derived from this wiretap
interception order resulted in two
arrests and the seizure of 5 pounds
of methamphetamine.
As a result of this wire interception,
agents were able to further identify
additional cocaine and
methamphetamine couriers
associated with the drug trafficking
organization (DTO).
40
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 4
Description of Communications Obtained and
Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Approximate No.
of Persons
Whose
Communications
Were Intercepted
Riverside
(cont’d)
2014-RIV-1377
50
2014-RIV-1378
Total No. of
Communications
Intercepted
Nature & Frequency
(Penal Code 629.62(9))
Incriminating
Communications
(%)
Other
Communications
(%)
4,775
33
67
0
0
0
100
2014-RIV-1379
16
305
40
60
2014-RIV-1380
4
698
23
77
2014-RIV-1381
0
1
0
100
2014-RIV-1382
0
17
2014-RIV-1383
7
1,536
20
80
2014-RIV-1384
0
2014-RIV-1385
0
2014-RIV-1386
10
193
27
73
2014-RIV-1387
214
4,147
14
86
2014-RIV-1388
54
3,494
48
52
2014-RIV-1389
The interception order assisted
agents in further identifying the
structure of the DTO.
As a result of this wire interception,
$36,805 and 2 pounds of marijuana
were seized.
Information derived from this wiretap
interception order resulted in three
arrests and the seizure of
7 kilograms of heroin and
4 kilograms of cocaine.
0
2014-RIV-1390
75
1,073
43
57
2014-RIV-1392
0
2
0
100
2014-RIV-1393
44
904
16
84
23
77
2014-RIV-1394
2014-RIV-1395
Comments on Usefulness of
Intercept 3
0
45
2014-RIV-1396
2,501
0
The subject discontinued using this
phone.
2014-RIV-1398
24
516
15
85
2014-RIV-1399
55
3,482
7
93
2014-RIV-1400
27
4,942
4
96
The subject discontinued using this
phone.
25
75
Intercepted communications
resulted in the seizure of 31 pounds
of methamphetamine and one
arrest.
2014-RIV-1401
0
2014-RIV-1402
0
2014-RIV-1403
105
3,175
41
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 4
Description of Communications Obtained and
Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Riverside
(cont’d)
2014-RIV-1404
Approximate No.
of Persons
Whose
Communications
Were Intercepted
Total No. of
Communications
Intercepted
Nature & Frequency
(Penal Code 629.62(9))
Incriminating
Communications
(%)
Other
Communications
(%)
0
2014-RIV-1405
126
924
40
60
2014-RIV-1406
554
9,504
13
87
2014-RIV-1407
9
649
30
70
2014-RIV-1408
36
15,486
22
78
2014-RIV-1409
0
0
0
100
2014-RIV-1410
32
2,015
22
78
2014-RIV-1411
105
3,232
40
60
2014-RIV-1412
2
20
20
80
2014-RIV-1413
15
3,661
27
73
2014-RIV-1414
66
924
30
70
2014-RIV-1415
7
248
40
60
2014-RIV-1416
As a result of this wire interception,
narcotic proceeds were seized at
various locations in the amounts of:
$70,000; $170,000; $180,000; and
$1.4 million.
As a result of this wire interception,
agents seized $22,433 in narcotic
proceeds.
As a result of this wire interception,
investigators identified other
associates and stash residences.
The interception also led to the
seizure of 4 kilograms of cocaine
and 5 pounds of methamphetamine.
0
2014-RIV-1417
86
3,246
15
85
2014-RIV-1418
32
2,346
15
85
52
48
2014-RIV-1419
0
2014-RIV-1420
0
2014-RIV-1421
Comments on Usefulness of
Intercept 3
109
2014-RIV-1423
1,090
The interception led to the arrest
and seizure of 4 pounds of
methamphetamine.
0
2014-RIV-1424
37
738
22
78
2014-RIV-1425
7
1,197
52
48
Interceptions from this wiretap order
led to the arrest of two individuals
and the seizure of 2 compartmented
vehicles.
42
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 4
Description of Communications Obtained and
Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
Riverside
(cont’d)
EICOS No.
Approximate No.
of Persons
Whose
Communications
Were Intercepted
Total No. of
Communications
Intercepted
Nature & Frequency
(Penal Code 629.62(9))
Incriminating
Communications
(%)
Other
Communications
(%)
2014-RIV-1426
27
21,267
74
26
2014-RIV-1427
222
1,425
13
87
2014-RIV-1428
35
2,781
12
88
2014-RIV-1429
11
458
81
19
2014-RIV-1430
As a result of this wire interception,
agents seized 26.2 kilograms of
heroin, 464.18 kilograms of cocaine,
8.55 kilograms of
methamphetamine, and $507,680 in
narcotic proceeds.
0
2014-RIV-1431
0
2014-RIV-1432
159
2,983
22
78
2014-RIV-1433
17
465
1
99
2014-RIV-1434
3
6
33
67
2014-RIV-1435
0
0
2014-RIV-1436
156
8,261
44
56
2014-RIV-1437
28
3,112
2
98
2014-RIV-1438
7
428
8
92
2014-RIV-1439
29
2,354
15
85
2014-RIV-1440
124
72,602
30
70
2014-RIV-1441
23
980
18
82
2014-RIV-1442
As a result of this wire interception,
$122,000 in narcotic proceeds was
seized from a residence.
This wiretap interception order led to
the seizure of $750,000 in narcotic
proceeds and 6 kilograms of heroin.
0
2014-RIV-1443
0
0
0
0
2014-RIV-1444
16
1,710
1
99
2014-RIV-1445
2
2
2
98
2014-RIV-1446
14
1,901
16
84
2014-RIV-1447
10
614
60
40
2014-RIV-1449
70
777
21
79
2014-RIV-1451
Comments on Usefulness of
Intercept 3
Phone was discarded by subject.
As a result of this wire interception, ,
$152,823 in narcotic proceeds was
seized.
As a result of this wire interception,
three people were arrested, and
$176,493 in narcotic proceeds and
6 kilograms of cocaine were seized.
As a result of this wire interception,
13 pounds of methamphetamine
was seized.
0
43
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 4
Description of Communications Obtained and
Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Approximate No.
of Persons
Whose
Communications
Were Intercepted
Riverside
(cont’d)
2014-RIV-1452
23
2014-RIV-1453
2014-RIV-1455
Total No. of
Communications
Intercepted
Nature & Frequency
(Penal Code 629.62(9))
Incriminating
Communications
(%)
Other
Communications
(%)
549
1
99
2
1
0
100
540
3,801
17
83
2014-RIV-1456
As a result of this wire interception,
agents seized $485,893 in narcotic
proceeds.
0
2014-RIV-1457
30
603
33
67
2014-RIV-1458
61
1,313
32
68
2014-RIV-1459
137
3,475
10
90
2014-RIV-1460
56
977
5
95
2014-RIV-1461
7
1,416
3
97
2014-RIV-1463
7
875
34
66
2014-RIV-1464
10
2,280
13
87
2014-RIV-1466
107
5,674
8
92
2014-RIV-1467
115
3,115
6
94
2014-RIV-1468
38
2,867
9
91
2014-RIV-1470
70
1,665
19
81
2014-RIV-1471
79
1,710
11
89
8
92
2014-RIV-1472
0
2014-RIV-1473
0
2014-RIV-1474
Comments on Usefulness of
Intercept 3
78
3,869
Interceptions led to the identification
and authoring of wiretap affidavits
for multiple other individuals
associated with the drug trafficking
organization.
As a result of this wire interception,
2 kilograms of cocaine was seized.
As a result of this wire interception,
$320,000 in narcotic proceeds was
seized.
This wiretap led to more intercepts
which resulted in multiple seizures
of narcotics and money from
narcotics proceeds.
As a result of this wire interception,
agents seized $382,000 in narcotic
proceeds.
As a result of this wire interception,
two people were arrested, and
$152,823 in narcotic proceeds was
seized.
The listed subject discontinued
using the target telephone. As a
result of a seizure, agents seized
5 kilograms of cocaine along with
2 vehicles, and four people were
arrested on drug charges.
This interception led to the seizure
of one handgun.
This wiretap interception order led to
the identification of two sources of
supply, customers, and couriers
operating within the drug trafficking
organization.
44
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 4
Description of Communications Obtained and
Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Approximate No.
of Persons
Whose
Communications
Were Intercepted
Riverside
(cont’d)
2014-RIV-1475
0
2014-RIV-1476
2014-RIV-1477
Total No. of
Communications
Intercepted
Nature & Frequency
(Penal Code 629.62(9))
Incriminating
Communications
(%)
Other
Communications
(%)
18
0
100
9
381
40
60
1
43
9
91
2014-RIV-1478
0
2014-RIV-1479
0
As a result of this wire interception,
three people were arrested, and
8 pounds of methamphetamine was
seized.
This intercept was not installed.
2014-RIV-1480
41
3,100
56
44
2014-RIV-1481
29
3,943
4
96
2014-RIV-1482
1
59
0
100
2014-RIV-1483
39
8,253
5
95
2013-RIV-1484
39
2,272
5
95
2014-RIV-1485
327
6,089
33
67
2014-RIV-1486
28
55,328
46
54
2014-RIV-1487
134
22,459
9
91
2014-RIV-1488
Comments on Usefulness of
Intercept 3
This wiretap interception led to the
seizure of 14 pounds of
methamphetamine and a handgun,
and one person was arrested.
As a result of this wire interception,
26.2 kilograms of heroin, 474.24
kilograms of cocaine, 8.55 kilograms
of methamphetamine and $507,680
in narcotic proceeds were seized.
As a result of this wire interception,
46 kilograms of cocaine and one
vehicle were seized, and one person
was arrested.
0
2014-RIV-1489
67
2,371
35
65
2014-RIV-1490
32
3,288
16
84
2014-RIV-1491
0
2014-RIV-1492
7
4,236
27
73
2014-RIV-1493
84
1,961
15
85
2014-RIV-1494
36
848
23
77
2014-RIV-1495
44
3,567
9
91
2014-RIV-1496
0
2014-RIV-1497
0
As a result of this wire interception,
agents seized $100,000 in narcotic
proceeds.
45
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 4
Description of Communications Obtained and
Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Approximate No.
of Persons
Whose
Communications
Were Intercepted
Riverside
(cont’d)
2014-RIV-1498
40
2014-RIV-1499
116
2014-RIV-1500
2014-RIV-1501
Total No. of
Communications
Intercepted
Nature & Frequency
(Penal Code 629.62(9))
Incriminating
Communications
(%)
Other
Communications
(%)
993
30
70
3,746
9
91
25
75
Interceptions led to the seizure of
$279,850 in narcotic proceeds.
As a result of this wire interception,
$60,500 in suspected narcotic
proceeds was seized.
0
86
2014-RIV-1502
6,816
0
2014-RIV-1503
64
3,360
7
93
2014-RIV-1504
13
122
7
93
2014-RIV-1505
44
731
37
63
2014-RIV-1506
47
1,666
24
76
2014-RIV-1507
This wiretap interception order led to
the seizure of 13 pounds of
methamphetamine and $60,400 in
narcotic proceeds.
As a result of this wire interception,
2 kilograms of cocaine and $21,563
were seized.
0
2014-RIV-1508
227
1,631
32
68
2014-RIV-1510
3
345
1
99
2014-RIV-1511
79
489
62
68
2014-RIV-1512
0
2014-RIV-1513
15
8,024
7
93
2014-RIV-1514
32
750
49
51
2014-RIV-1515
18
8,967
10
90
2014-RIV-1516
55
1,628
12
88
2014-RIV-1517
71
1,596
6
94
8
92
2014-RIV-1518
2014-RIV-1519
Comments on Usefulness of
Intercept 3
During this period of interceptions,
agents seized a mixture of
200 pounds of heroin and 60
pounds of cocaine.
As a result of this wire interception,
$308,710 and 3 kilograms of
cocaine were seized.
As a result of this wire interception,
three people were arrested, and 60
pounds of marijuana and 5 firearms
were seized.
As a result of this wire interception,
3 pounds of methamphetamine and
one vehicle was seized, and one
arrest was made.
0
11
167
46
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 4
Description of Communications Obtained and
Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Approximate No.
of Persons
Whose
Communications
Were Intercepted
Riverside
(cont’d)
2014-RIV-1520
186
2014-RIV-1521
Total No. of
Communications
Intercepted
Nature & Frequency
(Penal Code 629.62(9))
Incriminating
Communications
(%)
Other
Communications
(%)
7,939
14
86
5
357
56
44
2014-RIV-1522
65
988
22
78
2014-RIV-1523
28
4,307
52
48
2014-RIV-1524
As a result of this wire interception,
two people were arrested and
4 pounds of methamphetamine and
1 kilogram of cocaine were seized.
As a result of this wire interception,
26 kilograms of heroin, 474
kilograms of cocaine, 8.55 kilograms
of methamphetamine, and $507,680
were seized.
Interceptions assisted in the seizure
of $279,805 in narcotic proceeds.
0
2014-RIV-1525
230
3,119
5
95
2014-RIV-1526
112
830
5
95
2014-RIV-1527
34
2,277
12
88
2014-RIV-1528
65
1,400
33
67
2014-RIV-1529
113
2,993
28
72
7
93
2014-RIV-1530
2014-RIV-1533
Comments on Usefulness of
Intercept 3
As a result of this wire interception,
5 kilograms of cocaine was seized,
and four arrests were made.
Interceptions led to the identification
of additional telephone numbers of
associates of the drug trafficking
organization (DTO).
0
31
2014-RIV-1534
746
0
2014-RIV-1535
1
212
1
99
2014-RIV-1538
9
2,437
17
83
2014-RIV-1539
20
4,097
31
69
2014-RIV-1540
1
22
0
100
2014-RIV-1541
23
222
52
48
2014-RIV-1542
4
348
7
93
2014-RIV-1544
4
645
1
99
2014-RIV-1545
0
2014-RIV-1546
0
2014-RIV-1547
0
2014-RIV-1549
0
47
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 4
Description of Communications Obtained and
Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Approximate No.
of Persons
Whose
Communications
Were Intercepted
Riverside
(cont’d)
2014-RIV-1550
43
2014-RIV-1551
0
2014-RIV-1552
2014-RIV-1553
Total No. of
Communications
Intercepted
Nature & Frequency
(Penal Code 629.62(9))
Incriminating
Communications
(%)
Other
Communications
(%)
1,890
38
62
9
0
100
15
85
As a result of this wire interception,
two arrests were made and
$308,710 in narcotic proceeds was
seized.
0
7
2014-RIV-1554
283
0
2014-RIV-1555
175
7,110
18
82
2014-RIV-1557
31
633
11
89
2014-RIV-1558
159
8,898
10
90
2014-RIV-1559
0
152
0
100
2014-RIV-1561
As a result of this wire interception,
10 ounces of heroin and 2 kilograms
of cocaine were seized.
No activity to report.
0
2014-RIV-1563
45
1,793
13
87
2014-RIV-1565
90
4,537
11
89
2014-RIV-1568
11
222
68
32
2014-RIV-1569
5
307
5
95
2014-RIV-1570
As a result of this wire interception,
$493,978 in narcotic proceeds was
seized.
0
2014-RIV-1571
25
262
36
64
2014-RIV-1572
27
1,492
8
92
2014-RIV-1573
0
2014-RIV-1574
0
2014-RIV-1575
0
2014-RIV-1576
Comments on Usefulness of
Intercept 3
31
70,685
2014-RIV-1577
0
2014-RIV-1581
0
23
77
As a result of this wire interception,
$308,710 and 3 kilograms of
cocaine were seized, and two
arrests were made.
As a result of this wire interception,
$308,710 in narcotic proceeds and
3 kilograms of cocaine were seized.
This wiretap interception order
assisted in the seizure of 26
kilograms of heroin, 474 kilograms
of cocaine, 8 kilograms of
methamphetamine, and $539,202 in
narcotic proceeds.
Installed but not used.
48
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 4
Description of Communications Obtained and
Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Riverside
(cont’d)
2014-RIV-1582
2014-RIV-1586
Approximate No.
of Persons
Whose
Communications
Were Intercepted
Incriminating
Communications
(%)
Other
Communications
(%)
33
67
Comments on Usefulness of
Intercept 3
12
49
0
2014-RIV-1589
2
38
0
100
2014-SAC-54
213
5,131
17
83
2014-SAC-56
45
732
4
96
2014-SAC-57
2
482
28
72
2014-SAC-59
3
1,513
29
71
See 2014-SAC-57.
96
As a result of this wire interception,
detectives received crucial items of
evidence through communications.
All three defendants are pending
murder and attempted murder
charges.
2014-SAC-60
San Bernardino
Nature & Frequency
(Penal Code 629.62(9))
0
2014-RIV-1587
Sacramento
Total No. of
Communications
Intercepted
9
9,821
4
2014-SAC-61
4
772
92
8
2014-SBD-538
31
390
71
29
2014-SBD-539
22
160
22
78
2014-SBD-540
13
135
89
11
2014-SBD-542
95
1,484
19
81
2014-SBD-543
2,102
5,126
10
90
2014-SBD-544
5
1,965
38
62
2014-SBD-545
47
5,859
15
85
2014-SBD-546
201
13,228
5
95
The intel received from the wiretap
was valuable to further the
investigation of an unsolved murder
of an officer.
Disposition of these defendants is
still pending in Sacramento County.
As a result of this wire interception,
38 pounds of cocaine, 8 pounds of
methamphetamine, 6 pounds of
heroin, 5 firearms, and $360,000 in
drug proceeds were seized.
Investigation concluded in San
Joaquin and is being prosecuted
there.
See 2014-SAC-57.
As a result of this wire interception,
$68,000 in narcotic proceeds, 63
pounds of methamphetamine and
one firearm were seized, and one
arrest was made.
The phone was changed prior to
arrests and seizures.
Other subjects have been identified
and this case is ongoing.
As a result of this wire interception,
8 kilograms of heroin and
$20,000.00 were seized.
49
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 4
Description of Communications Obtained and
Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
San Bernardino
(cont’d)
EICOS No.
Approximate No.
of Persons
Whose
Communications
Were Intercepted
Total No. of
Communications
Intercepted
Nature & Frequency
(Penal Code 629.62(9))
Incriminating
Communications
(%)
Other
Communications
(%)
2014-SBD-547
127
13,028
5
95
2014-SBD-548
368
12,025
19
81
2014-SBD-549
0
112
0
100
2014-SBD-550
4
758
17
83
2014-SBD-551
154
3,154
13
87
2014-SBD-552
114
2,133
23
77
2014-SBD-553
616
7,604
21
79
2014-SBD-554
99
1,842
4
96
2014-SBD-555
5
87
19
81
2014-SBD-557
1,299
3,333
6
94
2014-SBD-558
90
1,203
24
76
Comments on Usefulness of
Intercept 3
As part of an ongoing murder
investigation, three suspects had
been identified. A multiagency task
force that assisted with a local
authorities obtained evidence
against the perpetrators, their coconspirators, aiders and abettors.
The content of the intercepted
communications confirmed the
identity of three suspects, who were
members of a criminal street gang,
and who were subsequently
arrested. Two out of the three were
charged with murder.
As a result of this wire interception,
10 pounds of opium (Mexican
Brown) was seized as well as
$91,000 in narcotic proceeds.
The wire intercept was conducted
after exhausting leads on a gangrelated murder and allowed
investigators to obtain incriminating
evidence sufficient for charges to be
filed on the offenses of murder,
attempted murder, participation in a
criminal street gang, and accessory
to murder on seven defendants.
As a result of this wire interception,
3 kilograms of heroin and $91,000
were seized, and one person was
arrested.
As a result of this wire interception,
20 kilograms of heroin and $200,000
were seized, and five people were
arrested.
As a result of this wire interception,
18 pounds of methamphetamine,
4 kilograms of heroin and $56,000
were seized, and four people were
arrested.
As a result of this wire interception,
10 kilograms of cocaine and
1 pound of methamphetamine were
seized.
No seizures were based off of these
intercepts.
As a result of this wire interception,
2 pounds of methamphetamine and
4 kilograms of heroin were seized,
and two arrests were made.
50
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 4
Description of Communications Obtained and
Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Approximate No.
of Persons
Whose
Communications
Were Intercepted
San Bernardino
(cont’d)
2014-SBD-559
37
423
Nature & Frequency
(Penal Code 629.62(9))
Incriminating
Communications
(%)
Other
Communications
(%)
22
78
2014-SBD-560
33
4,307
4
96
2014-SBD-561
26
325
13
87
2014-SBD-562
29
224
16
84
2014-SBD-563
72
7,818
2
98
2014-SBD-564
126
4,086
2
98
2014-SBD-566
70
751
40
60
2014-SBD-567
37
6,862
1
99
2014-SBD-569
35
238
31
69
2014-SBD-570
2014-SBD-571
San Diego
Total No. of
Communications
Intercepted
2014-SD-180
46
1,437
1,131
See 2014-SBD-559.
Subject discontinued using this
phone after his arrest. Agents
seized 21 pounds of
methamphetamine and $30,000
from the subject. Agents will file
criminal charges on the subject at
the termination of this case.
As a result of this wire interception,
the suspect was arrested on
suspicion of committing multiple
murders. The arrest concluded a
four year investigation spanning
multiple counties.
As a result of these interceptions,
investigators seized 8 pounds of
heroin, 1 pound of
methamphetamine, 1 handgun, and
$52,000 in narcotic proceeds.
These seizures are significant
amounts of narcotics and have a
direct impact on the community.
The subjects were believed to be
using additional telephones for their
criminal activity. The investigation is
ongoing.
See 2014-SBD-561.
The subject was believed to be
using an additional telephone for his
criminal activity. The investigation is
ongoing.
There have been no seizures
directly related to this wiretap,
however, other subjects have been
identified and this case is ongoing.
0
80
Comments on Usefulness of
Intercept 3
17
49
83
51
During the course of wire intercepts,
agents seized 18 pounds of
methamphetamine and 1 kilogram of
cocaine, and agents arrested three
individuals and anticipate two more
arrests.
51
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 4
Description of Communications Obtained and
Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
San Diego
(cont’d)
EICOS No.
Approximate No.
of Persons
Whose
Communications
Were Intercepted
Total No. of
Communications
Intercepted
Nature & Frequency
(Penal Code 629.62(9))
Incriminating
Communications
(%)
Other
Communications
(%)
2014-SD-181
103
23,001
8
92
2014-SD-182
305
11,015
19
81
2014-SD-183
106
5,295
22
78
2014-SD-185
5
65
18
82
2014-SD-186
78
1,707
84
16
2014-SD-187
118
12,764
14
86
2014-SD-188
0
0
0
0
2014-SD-189
138
4,397
37
63
Comments on Usefulness of
Intercept 3
This was a federal agency
investigation into a Mexico-based
drug trafficking organization (DTO)
specializing in the importation,
transportation, and distribution of
multi-pound quantities of cocaine
and methamphetamine from
Mexicali, Mexico to several cities in
the United States and Canada.
During the course of the
investigation, agents seized 12.56
kilograms of cocaine, 3.36 kilograms
of heroin, and 3 guns. Investigation
includes wires 13-17 (EICOS 2013SD-170), 13-18 and 14-02 (EICOS
2014-SD-194).
Subjects were members of an
international drug trafficking network
responsible for distributing multiple
pound quantities of
methamphetamine within San Diego
County. Investigation led to the
seizure of 8 pounds of
methamphetamine, the conviction of
nine co-conspirators, and the
identification of higher ranking
members of the organization.
Investigation included wires 14-03
and 14-07.
The intercepts of target phone
numbers provided agents with
information about narcotic
smuggling throughout the United
States. During the course of this ongoing investigation, agents seized
21.4 pounds of methamphetamine,
49.7 pounds of marijuana, 10 grams
of heroin, and $500 in narcotic
proceeds. Investigation included
wires 14-06, 14-10 and 14-13.
52
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 4
Description of Communications Obtained and
Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
San Diego
(cont’d)
San Joaquin
EICOS No.
Approximate No.
of Persons
Whose
Communications
Were Intercepted
Total No. of
Communications
Intercepted
Nature & Frequency
(Penal Code 629.62(9))
Incriminating
Communications
(%)
Other
Communications
(%)
2014-SD-190
165
4,878
8
92
2014-SD-191
57
263
0
100
2014-SD-192
217
13,066
4
96
2014-SD-193
120
33,551
27
46
2014-SD-195
57
540
7
93
2015-SJ-36
208
16,620
2
98
2015-SJ-37
0
2015-SJ-38
0
2015-SJ-39
0
2015-SJ-40
0
2015-SJ-41
0
2015-SJ-42
0
2015-SJ-43
0
2015-SJ-44
0
Comments on Usefulness of
Intercept 3
The wire enabled federal agents to
further infiltrate the DTO and
dismantle the organization
responsible for distributing multikilograms of narcotics in Southern
California. During the investigation,
agents seized 41 pounds of cocaine
and 1.5 pounds of
methamphetamine. Investigation
included wires 14-05, 14-08 and 1412.
This investigation involved efforts to
solve a double murder that occurred
in 1996. The investigation included
wires 14-01 and 14-11. It did not
result in any arrests.
Investigation into the drug trafficking
activities of a Mexico-based drug
trafficking organization (DTO)
involved in the importation,
transportation, and distribution of
large, multiple pound quantities of
methamphetmine into San Diego
County. Additionally, the DTO
coordinates the laundering of
monetary proceeds from the
narcotic sales through money
pick-ups and bank account deposits
made throughout the United States.
Investigation includes wires 14-04
and 14-09.
See 2014-SD-191.
Intercepts were used to prosecute a
criminal street gang for robbery,
narcotics, and human trafficking.
Wire intercepts were used for a
murder investigation.
Wire intercepts were used for a
murder investigation.
Wire intercepts were used for a
murder investigation.
Wire intercepts were used to
investigate a criminal street gang.
Wire intercepts were used to
investigate a criminal street gang.
Wire intercepts were used to
investigate a criminal street gang.
Wire intercepts were used to
investigate a criminal street gang.
53
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 4
Description of Communications Obtained and
Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
San Joaquin
(cont’d)
2015-SJ-45
2015-SJ-46
Santa Barbara
Santa Clara
Approximate No.
of Persons
Whose
Communications
Were Intercepted
Total No. of
Communications
Intercepted
Nature & Frequency
(Penal Code 629.62(9))
Incriminating
Communications
(%)
Other
Communications
(%)
Wire intercepts were used to
prosecute a criminal street gang.
0
111
1,014
37
63
711
8.5
91
2014-SBA-47
1,639
1
99
2014-SBA-48
181
24
76
2014-SBA-49
3,069
32
68
2015-SJ-47
0
2015-SJ-48
0
2015-SJ-49
0
2015-SJ-50
0
2015-SJ-51
0
2015-SJ-52
0
2015-SJ-53
0
2014-SBA-46
59
Comments on Usefulness of
Intercept 3
2014-SCL-71
27
729
23
77
2014-SCL-72
51
708
40
60
2014-SCL-74
124
1,873
23
77
2014-SCL-75
13
171
71
29
Wire intercepts were used to
investigate a homicide investigation.
Wire intercepts were used to
prosecute a criminal street gang.
Intercepts were used in an
investigation of a bank robbery
murder involving hostages.
Wire intercepts were used to
investigate a homicide prosecution.
Wire intercepts were used to
investigate a homicide prosecution.
Wire intercepts were used to
investigate a homicide prosecution.
Wire intercepts were used to
investigate a homicide prosecution.
Wire intercepts were used to
investigate a homicide prosecution.
The interception was directed at two
suspects in a murder. The year long
investigation had exhausted
investigative techniques. The wire
was intended to capture coconspirator statements regarding
the murder that could not otherwise
be obtained.
This investigation involved a cold
case homicide that occurred in
1989. The wire was used to
intercept calls between the two
suspects. The investigation was
reopened in 2012 with a DNA hit.
Intercepted calls revealed important
facts and admissions. The
investigation is ongoing by the
District Attorney's Office.
See WT 14-01 for a summary of the
investigation.
See WT 14-08, 14-09, 14-10, 14-11
and 14-13.
See WT 14-08, 14-09, 14-10, 14-11
and 14-13.
54
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 4
Description of Communications Obtained and
Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
Santa Clara
(cont’d)
Sonoma
EICOS No.
Approximate No.
of Persons
Whose
Communications
Were Intercepted
Total No. of
Communications
Intercepted
Nature & Frequency
(Penal Code 629.62(9))
Incriminating
Communications
(%)
Other
Communications
(%)
Comments on Usefulness of
Intercept 3
2014-SCL-76
76
1,295
32
68
This investigation (WT 12-15, 12-16,
12-19, 13-06, 13-08, 13-09, 13-11,
13-13, 14-02, 14-04, 14-05, 14-06
and 14-07) led to the dismantling of
this drug trafficking organization
(DTO) being sourced directly from
Mexico and distributing narcotics all
the way up to Canada. This
investigation led to the arrest of 22
individuals, $150,000 in asset
seizures, and the seizure of
9 firearms, a methamphetamine
conversion lab, a butane hash oil
lab, 14 pounds of heroin, 24 pounds
of methamphetamine, 8 gallons of
liquid methamphetamine, 15 pounds
of cocaine, and 60 pounds of
processed marijuana.
2014-SCL-77
23
129
10
90
See 2014-SCL-76.
2014-SCL-78
51
109
73
27
See 2014-SCL-76.
2014-SCL-79
173
3,577
11
89
See 2014-SCL-76.
2014-SCL-80
88
2,112
45
55
See 2014-SCL-76.
2014-SCL-81
74
3,006
28
72
2014-SCL-82
14
152
51
49
2014-SCL-83
73
1,952
38
62
2014-SCL-84
249
5,387
13
87
2014-SON-6
40
875
10
90
See WT 14-08, 14-09, 14-10, 14-11
and 14-13.
See WT 14-08, 14-09, 14-10, 14-11
and 14-13.
This is a pending investigation into a
gang and narcotics distribution
operation. Arrests have been
effectuated, but more are imminent.
Substantial quantities of cocaine,
cocaine base, methamphetamine,
and marijuana have been seized. In
addition, two drug labs and multiple
firearms have been uncovered.
The wiretap solidified a case
involving multiple bank robberies
and arrest warrants were issued.
When search warrants were
executed, a handgun was located
along with 2 ballistic vests, cell
phones, cell phone records, and
paperwork were located in various
locations along with clothing that
linked suspects to the robberies.
Police in a homicide investigation
obtained additional evidence to
corroborate DNA evidence found at
the scene to the perpetrator of the
murder.
55
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 4
Description of Communications Obtained and
Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Approximate No.
of Persons
Whose
Communications
Were Intercepted
Sonoma
(cont’d)
2014-SON-7
27
Stanislaus
2014-STA-63
Tulare
Total No. of
Communications
Intercepted
Nature & Frequency
(Penal Code 629.62(9))
Comments on Usefulness of
Intercept 3
Incriminating
Communications
(%)
Other
Communications
(%)
147
10
90
14
1,006
12.8
21
2014-STA-64
2
0
0
71
See results reported on 14-07.
2014-STA-65
65
831
19
19
See results reported on 14-01.
2014-STA-67
211
5,666
4.5
94.5
2014-STA-68
12
150
9
52
Wire interceptions provided critical
information as to persons involved in
a cold case homicide investigation
from 1992.
The wire interceptions allowed a
federal and county task force to
seize 815 grams of crystal
methamphetamine, 163 grams of
cocaine and $95,564.15 in assets
from a drug trafficking organization
(DTO). The intercepts assisted in
the arrests of five individuals and the
closure of a business that was used
to distribute crystal
methamphetamine.. To date, one
member of the DTO has been
convicted and hearings and trials for
the other four members are pending.
Intercept led to the arrest of two
people for a gang related homicide.
See results reported for 14-01.
This interception of drug related
phone calls enables law
enforcement to dismantle and
disrupt drug trade organizations and
reduce violent gang activity
associated with drug deals.
Wire interception resulted in the
dismantling of a drug smuggling
cartel operating from Mexico to
Northern California, 700 pounds of
methamphetamine was seized and
three federally indicted suspects are
still at large.
2014-STA-69
80
916
26.3
74
2014-STA-70
133
1,970
21
36
2014-STA-71
9
66
22.3
27.7
See results shown on 14-08.
2014-STA-72
17
118
13.4
16.4
See results reported on 14-08.
2014-STA-73
42
4,720
3.6
53.1
See results reports on 14-08.
2014-STA-74
30
2,016
7
43.8
See results reported on 14-08.
2014-STA-75
17
651
9.5
67.8
See results reported on 14-08.
2014-STA-76
30
1,853
11.7
65
See results reported in 14-08.
2014-STA-77
26
1,010
8.9
71.7
See results reported in 14-08.
2014-TUL-8
3
84
2014-TUL-9
7
309
56
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 4
Description of Communications Obtained and
Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Approximate No.
of Persons
Whose
Communications
Were Intercepted
Tulare
(cont’d)
2014-TUL-10
38
4,221
2014-TUL-11
70
4,391
2014-TUL-12
68
3,348
2014-TUL-13
14
386
2014-TUL-14
47
1,179
2014-TUL-15
69
7,523
2014-TUL-16
63
1,294
Ventura
Total No. of
Communications
Intercepted
Nature & Frequency
(Penal Code 629.62(9))
Incriminating
Communications
(%)
Other
Communications
(%)
Comments on Usefulness of
Intercept 3
As a result of this wire interception,
1 pound of methamphetamine was
seized.
As a result of this wire interception,
1 pound of methamphetamine was
seized.
2014-TUL-18
2,037
262
2015-TUL-19
0
0
2013-VE-74
326
19,149
9
91
2014-VE-84
427
95,415
14
86
2014-VE-85
428
20,683
12
88
2014-VE-86
328
211,492
6
94
2014-VE-87
15
389
7
93
2014-VE-88
179
22,388
4
96
2014-VE-89
70
4,236
14
86
2014-VE-90
64
4,469
11
89
During this time frame, three
subjects were arrested and are
pending charges. A total of
2 pounds of methamphetamine was
seized.
During this time frame, there were
no phone calls made on this target
telephone.
Detectives located a
methamphetamine conversion lab
and recovered 26 pounds of
methamphetamine and 4 liters of
liquid methamphetamine.
Detectives also interdicted heroin
and methamphetamine being
transited through Ventura County.
Investigation led to discovery of a
methamphetamine recovery and
conversion lab, liquid
methamphetamine, and 26 pounds
of methamphetamine.
Gang members were committing
residential burglaries of homes
belonging to people of Indian
ethnicity based upon a cultural
tendency to possess gold. The
money generated from the
burglaries was used to further the
criminal activities of the gang.
57
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 4
Description of Communications Obtained and
Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Approximate No.
of Persons
Whose
Communications
Were Intercepted
Ventura
(cont’d)
2014-VE-91
136
2014-VE-92
4
Total No. of
Communications
Intercepted
Nature & Frequency
(Penal Code 629.62(9))
Incriminating
Communications
(%)
Other
Communications
(%)
5,650
20
80
286
3
97
2014-VE-93
120
3,490
9
91
2014-VE-94
185
17,789
12
88
2014-VE-95
489
36,375
16
84
2014-VE-96
569
18,681
7
93
2014-VE-97
92
3,911
14
86
2014-VE-98
28
1,276
26
74
2014-VE-99
806
36,375
6
94
2014-VE-100
88
4,037
17
83
2014-VE-101
213
14,332
7
93
2014-VE-102
66
2,937
20
80
2014-VE-103
1,111
45,207
7
93
2014-VE-104
62
1,387
28
72
2014-VE-105
62
2,340
5
95
2014-VE-106
334
9,944
5
95
2014-VE-109
4
16
19
81
2014-VE-110
53
6,733
54
46
2014-VE-111
43
474
16
84
2014-VE-113
62
684
25
75
Comments on Usefulness of
Intercept 3
Defendants conspired with a
confidential informant to murder a
perceived informant. The murder
was to be funded with the proceeds
from an identity theft scheme.
Primary subject of gang-related drug
dealing and extortion wiretap
investigation was murdered on
second day of interception. Wiretap
led to information regarding the
murder.
Heroin and methamphetamine were
seized in a vehicle which crossed
the US/Mexico border and drove
directly to Ventura County. Multiple
pounds of methamphetamine was
recovered from stash house in San
Bernardino County.
58
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 5
Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report
Date of
Order for
Service of
Inventory
Date Granted
for
Postponement
of Service of
Inventory
Date of
Number
Compliance
of
With
Inventory
Inventory
Notices
Order
Sent
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Name of
Applicant/Agency
Judge
Authorizing
Application
Alameda
2014-ALA-19
O'Malley, DA
Hon. Rolefson
3/24/2015
12/18/2014
2014-ALA-20
O'Malley, DA
Hon. Rolefson
3/24/2015
12/18/2014
2014-ALA-24
O'Malley, DA
Hon. Rolefson
3/18/2014
2014-ALA-28
O'Malley, DA
Hon. Rolefson
3/16/2015
1/9/2015
2014-ALA-29
O'Malley, DA
Hon. Rolefson
3/16/2015
1/9/2015
2014-ALA-30
O'Malley, DA
Hon. Rolefson
3/16/2015
1/9/2015
2014-ALA-31
O'Malley, DA
Hon. Rolefson
3/16/2015
1/9/2015
2014-ALA-32
O'Malley, DA
Hon. Rolefson
3/16/2015
1/9/2015
2014-ALA-33
O'Malley, DA
Hon. Rolefson
3/16/2015
1/9/2015
2014-ALA-34
O'Malley, DA
Hon. Rolefson
3/16/2015
1/9/2015
2014-CO-1
Peterson, DA
Hon. Laettner
(Inventory due)
10/17/2014
9/13/2014
2014-CO-2
Peterson, DA
Hon. Laettner
(Inventory due)
1/20/2015
2014-CC-8
Peterson, DA
Hon. Laettner
(Inventory due)
4/21/2014
10/9/2014
2014-CC-9
Peterson, DA
Hon. Laettner
(Inventory due)
4/21/2014
10/9/2014
2014-CC-10
Peterson, DA
Hon. Laettner
(Inventory due)
11/14/2014
9/13/2014
2014-CC-11
Peterson, DA
Hon. Laettner
(Inventory due)
12/12/2014
9/13/2014
2014-ED-1
Horn, Det.
Hon. Wagoner
1/17/2014
1/14/2014
2014-ED-2
Bice, Investigative Asst. DA
Hon. Wagoner
2/7/2014
2/6/2014
Contra Costa
El Dorado
9
59
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 5
Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report
Date of
Order for
Service of
Inventory
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Name of
Applicant/Agency
Judge
Authorizing
Application
Fresno
2014-FR-6
Egan, DA
Hon. Harrell
(Inventory due)
4/10/2014
2014-FR-7
Egan, DA
Hon. Harrell
(Inventory due)
4/10/2014
2014-FR-8
Egan, DA
Hon. Harrell
(Inventory due)
4/10/2014
2014-FR-9
Egan, DA
Hon. Peterson
(Inventory due)
11/25/2014
2014-FR-11
Egan, DA
Hon. Peterson
(Inventory due)
12/18/2014
2014-FR-13
Egan, DA
Hon. Peterson
(Inventory due)
12/7/2014
2014-FR-14
Egan, DA
Hon. Peterson
(Inventory due)
12/7/2014
2014-FR-15
Egan, DA
Hon. Peterson
(Inventory due)
12/28/2014
2014-FR-16
Egan, DA
Hon. Peterson
(Inventory due)
2/18/2015
2014-FR-17
Egan, DA
Hon. Peterson
(Inventory due)
2/8/2015
2014-FR-18
Egan, DA
Hon. Peterson
(Inventory due)
3/10/2015
2014-FR-19
Egan, DA
Hon. Peterson
(Inventory due)
2/3/2015
2014-FR-20
Egan, DA
Hon. Peterson
(Inventory due)
2/16/2015
2014-FR-21
Egan, DA
Hon. Peterson
(Inventory due)
1/28/2015
2014-FR-22
Egan, DA
Hon. Peterson
(Inventory due)
1/12/2015
2014-FR-23
Egan, DA
Hon. Peterson
(Inventory due)
1/26/2015
2014-FR-24
Egan, DA
Hon. Peterson
(Inventory due)
1/27/2015
2014-FR-25
Egan, DA
Hon. Peterson
(Inventory due)
2/13/2015
Date Granted
for
Postponement
of Service of
Inventory
Date of
Number
Compliance
of
With
Inventory
Inventory
Notices
Order
Sent
60
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 5
Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report
Date of
Order for
Service of
Inventory
Date Granted
for
Postponement
of Service of
Inventory
Date of
Number
Compliance
of
With
Inventory
Inventory
Notices
Order
Sent
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Name of
Applicant/Agency
Judge
Authorizing
Application
Fresno
(cont’d)
2014-FR-26
Egan, DA
Hon. Peterson
(Inventory due)
1/23/2015
2014-FR-27
Egan, DA
Hon. Peterson
(Inventory due)
2/17/2015
2014-FR-28
Egan, DA
Hon. Peterson
(Inventory due)
2/1/2015
2014-FR-29
Egan, DA
Hon. Peterson
(Inventory due)
2/14/2015
2014-FR-30
Egan, DA
Hon. Peterson
(Inventory due)
2/16/2015
2014-FR-31
Egan, DA
Hon. Peterson
(Inventory due)
2/16/2015
2013-KE-35
Green, DA
Hon. Twisselman
4/27/2014
2013-KE-36
Green, DA
Hon. Twisselman
4/27/2014
2014-KE-37
Green, DA
Hon. Brownlee
7/23/2014
0
2014-KE-38
Green, DA
Hon. Brownlee
11/6/2014
0
2014-KE-39
Green, DA
Hon. Brownlee
2/2/2015
2014-KE-40
Green, DA
Hon. Brownlee
12/14/2014
2014-KE-41
Green, DA
Hon. Brownlee
2/2/2015
1/28/2015
46
2014-KE-42
Green, DA
Hon. Brownlee
2/2/2015
1/28/2015
46
2014-KE-43
Green, DA
Hon. Brownlee
2/2/2015
1/28/2015
46
2014-KE-44
Green, DA
Hon. Brownlee
(Inventory due)
1/18/2015
2014-KE-45
Green, DA
Hon. Brownlee
2/19/2015
2014-KE-46
Green, DA
Hon. Brownlee
2/19/2015
Kern
1/28/2015
46
0
61
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 5
Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report
Date of
Order for
Service of
Inventory
Date Granted
for
Postponement
of Service of
Inventory
Date of
Number
Compliance
of
With
Inventory
Inventory
Notices
Order
Sent
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Name of
Applicant/Agency
Judge
Authorizing
Application
Kern
(cont’d)
2015-KE-47
Green, DA
Hon. Brownlee
2/18/2015
1/22/2015
13
2015-KE-48
Green, DA
Hon. Brownlee
2/18/2015
1/22/2015
13
2014-KE-49
Green, DA
Hon. Brownlee
10/9/2014
1/29/2015
7
2014-KE-50
Green, DA
Hon. Lewis
2/19/2015
2014-KE-51
Green, DA
Hon. Lewis
2/19/2015
2014-KE-52
Green, Da
Hon. Lewis
2/19/2015
2014-KE-53
Green, DA
Hon. Lewis
2/19/2015
2014-KI-16
Hacker, DA
Hon. Reinhardt
10/20/2014
9/15/2014
50
2014-KI-17
Hacker, DA
Hon. Tarter
1/13/2015
10/23/2014
5
2014-LA-747
Lacey, DA
Hon. FIDLER
4/1/2014
2014-LA-748
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
6/21/2014
2014-LA-749
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
(Inventory due)
7/19/2014
2014-LA-750
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
4/8/2014
2014-LA-751
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
5/12/2014
2014-LA-752
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
5/14/2014
2014-LA-753
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
7/20/2014
2014-LA-754
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
5/7/2014
2014-LA-755
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
5/12/2014
Kings
Los Angeles
62
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 5
Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report
Date of
Order for
Service of
Inventory
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Name of
Applicant/Agency
Judge
Authorizing
Application
Los Angeles
(cont’d)
2014-LA-756
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
5/5/2014
2014-LA-757
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
7/20/2014
2014-LA-758
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
5/26/2014
2014-LA-759
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
5/28/2014
2014-LA-760
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
5/26/2014
2014-LA-761
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
6/21/2014
2014-LA-762
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
(Inventory due)
6/28/2014
2014-LA-763
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
5/28/2014
2014-LA-764
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
(Inventory due)
5/23/2014
2014-LA-765
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
(Inventory due)
8/28/2014
2014-LA-766
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
(Inventory due)
7/16/2014
2014-LA-768
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
(Inventory due)
7/17/2014
2014-LA-769
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
(Inventory due)
8/16/2014
2014-LA-770
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
(Inventory due)
7/28/2014
2014-LA-771
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
8/6/2014
2014-LA-772
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
8/6/2014
2014-LA-773
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
8/11/2014
2014-LA-774
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
8/15/2014
Date Granted
for
Postponement
of Service of
Inventory
Date of
Number
Compliance
of
With
Inventory
Inventory
Notices
Order
Sent
63
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 5
Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report
Date of
Order for
Service of
Inventory
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Name of
Applicant/Agency
Judge
Authorizing
Application
Los Angeles
(cont’d)
2014-LA-775
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
8/9/2014
2014-LA-776
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
8/27/2014
2014-LA-777
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
7/28/2014
2014-LA-778
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
7/29/2014
2014-LA-779
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
(Inventory due)
8/27/2014
2014-LA-780
Lacey, DA
Hon. Olmedo
8/22/2014
2014-LA-781
Lacey, DA
Hon. Olmedo
9/17/2014
2014-LA-782
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
8/23/2014
2014-LA-783
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
9/15/2014
2013-LA-786
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
7/23/2014
2014-LA-787
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
5/18/2014
2014-LA-788
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
7/19/2014
2014-LAK-2
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
8/28/2014
2014-LA-789
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
8/29/2014
2014-LA-790
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
8/28/2014
2014-LA-791
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
7/25/2014
2014-LA-792
Lacey, DA
Hon. Olmedo
8/21/2014
2014-LA-793
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
7/29/2014
Date Granted
for
Postponement
of Service of
Inventory
Date of
Number
Compliance
of
With
Inventory
Inventory
Notices
Order
Sent
0
0
64
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 5
Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report
Date of
Order for
Service of
Inventory
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Name of
Applicant/Agency
Judge
Authorizing
Application
Los Angeles
(cont’d)
2014-LA-794
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
8/28/2014
2014-LA-795
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
8/29/2014
2014-LA-796
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
9/3/2014
2014-LA-797
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
11/5/2014
13-155
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
6/11/2014
2014-LA-800
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
2/11/2014
2014-LA-801
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
2/9/2014
2014-LA-804
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
4/3/2014
2014-LA-805
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
10/19/2014
2014-LA-806
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
10/2/2014
2014-LA-807
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
10/10/2014
2014-LA-808
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
10/18/2014
2014-LA-809
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
11/9/2014
2014-LA-810
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
10/27/2014
2014-LA-811
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
9/21/2014
2014-LA-812
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
11/13/2014
2014-LA-813
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
11/24/2014
2014-LA-814
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
11/29/2014
Date Granted
for
Postponement
of Service of
Inventory
Date of
Number
Compliance
of
With
Inventory
Inventory
Notices
Order
Sent
65
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 5
Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report
Date of
Order for
Service of
Inventory
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Name of
Applicant/Agency
Judge
Authorizing
Application
Los Angeles
(cont’d)
2014-LA-815
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
11/30/2014
2014-LA-816
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
11/8/2014
2014-LA-817
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
11/5/2014
2014-LA-818
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
12/7/2014
2014-LA-820
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
6/14/2014
2014-LA-821
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
5/27/2014
2014-LA-822
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
9/1/2014
2014-LA-823
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
11/24/2014
2014-LA-824
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
11/12/2014
2014-LA-825
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
7/24/2014
2014-LA-826
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
11/3/2014
2014-LA-827
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
7/25/2014
2014-LA-828
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
11/7/2014
2014-LAS-6
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
1/7/2015
2014-LA-829
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
10/11/2014
2014-LA-831
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
11/13/2014
2014-LA-832
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
10/28/2014
2014-LA-833
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
2/22/2015
Date Granted
for
Postponement
of Service of
Inventory
Date of
Number
Compliance
of
With
Inventory
Inventory
Notices
Order
Sent
66
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 5
Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report
Date of
Order for
Service of
Inventory
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Name of
Applicant/Agency
Judge
Authorizing
Application
Los Angeles
(cont’d)
2014-LA-834
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
2/28/2015
2014-LA-835
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
3/1/2015
2014-LA-836
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
10/17/2014
2014-LA-838
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
12/19/2014
2014-LA-839
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
3/9/2015
2014-LA-840
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
6/27/2014
2014-LA-841
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
12/11/2014
2014-LA-842
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
8/29/2014
2014-LA-843
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
6/3/2014
2014-LA-844
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
10/17/2014
2014-LA-845
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
1/26/2015
2014-LA-847
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
12/28/2014
2014-LA-848
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
2/14/2015
2014-LA-849
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
12/1/2014
2014-LA-850
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
12/25/2014
2014-LA-851
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
3/1/2015
2014-LA-852
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
3/10/2015
2014-LA-853
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
1/30/2015
Date Granted
for
Postponement
of Service of
Inventory
Date of
Number
Compliance
of
With
Inventory
Inventory
Notices
Order
Sent
67
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 5
Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report
Date of
Order for
Service of
Inventory
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Name of
Applicant/Agency
Judge
Authorizing
Application
Los Angeles
(cont’d)
2014-LA-854
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
7/6/2014
2014-LA-855
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
6/20/2014
2014-LA-856
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
12/4/2014
2014-LA-857
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
8/4/2014
2014-LA-858
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
12/28/2014
2014-LA-859
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
1/25/2015
2014-LA-860
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
1/3/2015
2014-LA-861
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
11/18/2014
2014-LA-862
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
12/12/2014
2014-LA-863
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
1/8/2015
2014-LA-864
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
1/22/2015
2014-LA-866
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
3/12/2015
2014-LA-867
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
2/14/2015
2014-LA-868
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
2/27/2015
2014-LA-869
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
3/16/2015
2014-LA-870
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
3/18/2014
2014-LAS-7
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
3/12/2015
2014-LA-871
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
10/12/2014
Date Granted
for
Postponement
of Service of
Inventory
Date of
Number
Compliance
of
With
Inventory
Inventory
Notices
Order
Sent
68
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 5
Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report
Date of
Order for
Service of
Inventory
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Name of
Applicant/Agency
Judge
Authorizing
Application
Los Angeles
(cont’d)
2014-LAS-8
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
3/16/2015
2014-LA-872
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
3/24/2015
2014-LA-873
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
9/9/2014
2014-LA-874
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
9/9/2014
2014-LA-876
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
6/23/2014
2014-LA-877
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
6/23/2014
2014-LA-878
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
3/23/2015
2014-LA-879
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
9/24/2014
2014-LA-880
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
10/6/2014
2014-LA-881
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
10/28/2014
2014-LA-883
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
5/3/2014
2014-LA-884
Lacey, DA
Hon. Fidler
6/2/2014
2014-MAD-5
Keitz, DA
Hon. Rigby
2/6/2015
2014-MAD-7
Keitz, DA
Hon. Rigby
2/13/2015
2014-MAD-8
Keitz, DA
Hon. Rigby
2/13/2015
2014-MAD-9
Keitz, DA
Hon. Rigby
2/13/2015
2014-MAD-10
Keitz, DA
Hon. Rigby
3/10/2015
2014-MAD-12
Keitz, DA
Hon. Rigby
3/10/2015
Madera
Date Granted
for
Postponement
of Service of
Inventory
Date of
Number
Compliance
of
With
Inventory
Inventory
Notices
Order
Sent
69
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 5
Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report
Date of
Order for
Service of
Inventory
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Name of
Applicant/Agency
Judge
Authorizing
Application
Madera
(cont’d)
2014-MAD-13
Keitz, DA
Hon. Rigby
3/10/2015
2014-MAD-15
Keitz, DA
Hon. Rigby
3/10/2015
Merced
2014-MER-27
Morse, DA
Hon. Bacciarini
7/1/2014
Napa
2014-NA-1
Lieberstein, DA
Hon. Boessenecker
(Inventory due)
10/26/2014
Orange
2014-OR-86
Rackauckas, DA
Hon. Jensen
6/27/2014
2014-OR-87
Rackauckas, DA
Hon. Jensen
2/23/2015
2014-OR-88
Rackauckas, DA
Hon. Jensen
2/23/2015
2014-PLA-3
Wilson, ADA
Hon. Wachob
5/29/2014
2014-PLA-4
Wilson, ADA
Hon. Wachob
5/29/2014
2013-RIV-899
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
4/1/2014
2013-RIV-902
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
4/3/2014
2013-RIV-904
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
7/5/2014
2013-RIV-905
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
4/10/2014
2013-RIV-906
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
4/9/2014
2013-RIV-911
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
5/9/2014
2013-RIV-915
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
8/29/2014
2013-RIV-916
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
4/16/2014
2013-RIV-922
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
(Inventory due)
4/17/2014
Placer
Riverside
Date Granted
for
Postponement
of Service of
Inventory
Date of
Number
Compliance
of
With
Inventory
Inventory
Notices
Order
Sent
7/1/2014
1060
7/9/2014
8
6/4/2014
39
6/4/2014
19
9/25/2014
70
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 5
Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report
Date of
Order for
Service of
Inventory
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Name of
Applicant/Agency
Judge
Authorizing
Application
Riverside
(cont’d)
2013-RIV-925
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
4/3/2014
2013-RIV-926
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
1/2/2014
2013-RIV-927
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
4/3/2013
2013-RIV-928
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
4/7/2014
2013-RIV-929
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
4/3/2014
2013-RIV-930
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
5/2/2014
2013-RIV-931
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
5/2/2014
2013-RIV-932
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
4/7/2014
2013-RIV-933
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
4/8/2014
2013-RIV-934
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
4/3/2014
2013-RIV-935
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
5/9/2014
2013-RIV-936
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
4/5/2014
2013-RIV-937
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
6/29/2014
2013-RIV-938
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
4/10/2014
2013-RIV-939
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
4/5/2014
2013-RIV-940
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
4/5/2014
2013-RIV-941
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
5/6/2014
2013-RIV-942
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
4/11/2014
Date Granted
for
Postponement
of Service of
Inventory
Date of
Number
Compliance
of
With
Inventory
Inventory
Notices
Order
Sent
71
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 5
Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report
Date of
Order for
Service of
Inventory
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Name of
Applicant/Agency
Judge
Authorizing
Application
Riverside
(cont’d)
2013-RIV-943
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
4/15/2014
2013-RIV-944
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
4/17/2014
2013-RIV-945
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
4/17/2014
2013-RIV-946
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
4/18/2014
2013-RIV-947
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
5/20/2014
2013-RIV-948
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
4/18/2014
2013-RIV-949
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
4/18/2014
2013-RIV-950
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
4/18/2014
2013-RIV-951
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
4/23/2014
2013-RIV-952
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
6/15/2014
2013-RIV-954
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
4/26/2014
2013-RIV-955
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
4/26/2014
2013-RIV-956
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
(Inventory due)
4/11/2014
2014-RIV-957
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
5/7/2014
2014-RIV-958
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
5/7/2014
2014-RIV-959
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
5/7/2014
2014-RIV-960
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
5/7/2014
2014-RIV-961
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
5/27/2014
Date Granted
for
Postponement
of Service of
Inventory
Date of
Number
Compliance
of
With
Inventory
Inventory
Notices
Order
Sent
72
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 5
Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report
Date of
Order for
Service of
Inventory
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Name of
Applicant/Agency
Judge
Authorizing
Application
Riverside
(cont’d)
2014-RIV-962
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
6/9/2014
2014-RIV-963
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
6/9/2014
2014-RIV-964
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
5/9/2014
2014-RIV-965
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
5/8/2014
2014-RIV-966
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
5/7/2014
2014-RIV-967
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
4/30/2014
2014-RIV-968
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
4/23/2014
2014-RIV-969
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
5/14/2014
2014-RIV-970
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
5/14/2014
2014-RIV-971
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
5/11/2014
2014-RIV-972
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
5/13/2014
2014-RIV-973
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
5/16/2014
2014-RIV-974
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
5/16/2014
2014-RIV-975
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
9/20/2014
2014-RIV-976
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
5/6/2014
2014-RIV-977
Zellerbach, DA
2014-RIV-980
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
5/20/2014
2014-RIV-981
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
5/11/2014
Date Granted
for
Postponement
of Service of
Inventory
Date of
Number
Compliance
of
With
Inventory
Inventory
Notices
Order
Sent
5/15/2014
73
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 5
Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report
Date of
Order for
Service of
Inventory
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Name of
Applicant/Agency
Judge
Authorizing
Application
Riverside
(cont’d)
2014-RIV-982
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
5/26/2014
2014-RIV-983
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
5/26/2014
2014-RIV-984
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
5/26/2014
2014-RIV-985
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
5/22/2014
2014-RIV-986
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
5/25/2014
2014-RIV-987
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
5/6/2014
2014-RIV-988
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
5/26/2014
2014-RIV-989
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
5/15/2014
2014-RIV-990
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
7/12/2014
2014-RIV-991
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
5/16/2014
2014-RIV-992
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
5/27/2014
2014-RIV-993
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
5/27/2014
2014-RIV-994
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
6/1/2014
2014-RIV-995
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
5/6/2014
2014-RIV-996
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
5/17/2014
2013-RIV-997
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
6/1/2014
2014-RIV-998
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
5/25/2014
2014-RIV-999
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
1/3/2015
Date Granted
for
Postponement
of Service of
Inventory
Date of
Number
Compliance
of
With
Inventory
Inventory
Notices
Order
Sent
74
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 5
Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report
Date of
Order for
Service of
Inventory
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Name of
Applicant/Agency
Judge
Authorizing
Application
Riverside
(cont’d)
2014-RIV-1000
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
6/29/2014
2014-RIV-1001
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
6/4/2014
2014-RIV-1002
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
7/4/2014
2014-RIV-1003
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
5/25/2014
2014-RIV-1004
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
5/18/2014
2014-RIV-1005
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
5/24/2014
2014-RIV-1006
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
6/9/2014
2014-RIV-1007
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
5/12/2014
2014-RIV-1008
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
5/20/2014
2014-RIV-1009
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
6/7/2014
2014-RIV-1010
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
6/6/2014
2014-RIV-1011
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
6/9/2014
2014-RIV-1012
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
6/9/2014
2014-RIV-1013
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
6/9/2014
2014-RIV-1014
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
5/11/2014
2014-RIV-1016
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
6/14/2014
2014-RIV-1017
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
5/15/2014
2014-RIV-1018
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
7/12/2014
Date Granted
for
Postponement
of Service of
Inventory
Date of
Number
Compliance
of
With
Inventory
Inventory
Notices
Order
Sent
9/25/2014
75
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 5
Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report
Date of
Order for
Service of
Inventory
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Name of
Applicant/Agency
Judge
Authorizing
Application
Riverside
(cont’d)
2014-RIV-1019
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
6/15/2014
2014-RIV-1020
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
6/15/2014
2014-RIV-1021
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
7/18/2014
2014-RIV-1022
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
6/15/2014
2014-RIV-1023
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
6/16/2014
2014-RIV-1024
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
6/15/2014
2014-RIV-1025
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
6/14/2014
2014-RIV-1026
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
6/20/2014
2014-RIV-1027
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
6/19/2014
2014-RIV-1028
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
6/20/2014
2014-RIV-1029
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
6/20/2014
2014-RIV-1030
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
6/20/2014
2014-RIV-1031
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
7/18/2014
2014-RIV-1032
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
6/22/2014
2014-RIV-1033
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
6/22/2014
2014-RIV-1034
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
6/11/2014
2014-RIV-1035
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
7/17/2014
2014-RIV-1036
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
6/22/2014
Date Granted
for
Postponement
of Service of
Inventory
Date of
Number
Compliance
of
With
Inventory
Inventory
Notices
Order
Sent
76
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 5
Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report
Date of
Order for
Service of
Inventory
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Name of
Applicant/Agency
Judge
Authorizing
Application
Riverside
(cont’d)
2014-RIV-1037
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
6/22/2014
2014-RIV-1039
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
6/22/2014
2014-RIV-1040
Zellerbach, DA
2014-RIV-1041
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
7/1/2014
2014-RIV-1042
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
6/11/2014
2014-RIV-1043
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
6/17/2014
2014-RIV-1044
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
6/28/2014
2014-RIV-1045
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
7/27/2014
2013-RIV-1046
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
6/29/2014
2014-RIV-1047
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
6/24/2014
2014-RIV-1048
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
6/28/2014
2014-RIV-1049
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
7/25/2014
2014-RIV-1050
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
6/27/2014
2014-RIV-1051
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
7/2/2014
2014-RIV-1052
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
6/28/2014
2014-RIV-1053
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
9/21/2014
2014-RIV-1054
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
7/26/2014
2014-RIV-1055
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
6/30/2014
Date Granted
for
Postponement
of Service of
Inventory
Date of
Number
Compliance
of
With
Inventory
Inventory
Notices
Order
Sent
6/27/2014
77
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 5
Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report
Date of
Order for
Service of
Inventory
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Name of
Applicant/Agency
Judge
Authorizing
Application
Riverside
(cont’d)
2014-RIV-1056
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
7/1/2014
2014-RIV-1057
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
6/4/2014
2014-RIV-1058
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
8/2/2014
2014-RIV-1059
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
7/4/2014
2014-RIV-1060
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
6/10/2014
2014-RIV-1061
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
7/4/2014
2014-RIV-1062
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
7/10/2014
2014-RIV-1063
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
7/5/2014
2014-RIV-1064
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
8/10/2014
2014-RIV-1065
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
7/6/2014
2014-RIV-1066
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
7/5/2014
2014-RIV-1067
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
8/3/2014
2014-RIV-1068
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
7/6/2014
2014-RIV-1070
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
7/15/2014
2014-RIV-1071
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
7/12/2014
2014-RIV-1072
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
6/21/2014
2014-RIV-1073
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
7/12/2014
2014-RIV-1074
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
7/11/2014
Date Granted
for
Postponement
of Service of
Inventory
Date of
Number
Compliance
of
With
Inventory
Inventory
Notices
Order
Sent
78
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 5
Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report
Date of
Order for
Service of
Inventory
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Name of
Applicant/Agency
Judge
Authorizing
Application
Riverside
(cont’d)
2014-RIV-1075
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
6/19/2014
2014-RIV-1076
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
8/8/2014
2014-RIV-1078
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
8/8/2014
2014-RIV-1079
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
8/29/2014
2014-RIV-1080
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
8/10/2014
2013-RIV-1081
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
7/11/2014
2014-RIV-1082
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
7/16/2014
2014-RIV-1083
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
10/3/2014
2014-RIV-1084
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
8/14/2014
2014-RIV-1085
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
9/15/2014
2014-RIV-1086
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
7/26/2014
2014-RIV-1087
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
6/27/2014
2014-RIV-1088
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
8/16/2014
2014-RIV-1089
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
7/16/2014
2014-RIV-1090
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
8/16/2014
2014-RIV-1091
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
7/16/2014
2014-RIV-1092
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
7/17/2014
2014-RIV-1093
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
7/17/2014
Date Granted
for
Postponement
of Service of
Inventory
Date of
Number
Compliance
of
With
Inventory
Inventory
Notices
Order
Sent
79
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 5
Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report
Date of
Order for
Service of
Inventory
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Name of
Applicant/Agency
Judge
Authorizing
Application
Riverside
(cont’d)
2014-RIV-1094
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
7/19/2014
2014-RIV-1095
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
9/22/2014
2014-RIV-1096
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
9/21/2014
2014-RIV-1097
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
7/25/2014
2014-RIV-1098
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
7/24/2014
2014-RIV-1099
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
7/24/2014
2014-RIV-1100
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
7/23/2014
2014-RIV-1101
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
8/23/2014
2014-RIV-1102
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
7/24/2014
2014-RIV-1103
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
7/24/2014
2014-RIV-1104
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
8/28/2014
2014-RIV-1106
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
7/25/2014
2014-RIV-1108
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
7/25/2014
2014-RIV-1109
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
7/26/2014
2014-RIV-1110
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
7/26/2014
2014-RIV-1111
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
7/27/2014
2014-RIV-1112
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
7/26/2014
2014-RIV-1113
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
7/27/2014
Date Granted
for
Postponement
of Service of
Inventory
Date of
Number
Compliance
of
With
Inventory
Inventory
Notices
Order
Sent
80
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 5
Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report
Date of
Order for
Service of
Inventory
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Name of
Applicant/Agency
Judge
Authorizing
Application
Riverside
(cont’d)
2014-RIV-1114
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
7/27/2014
2014-RIV-1115
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
7/30/2014
2014-RIV-1116
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
7/30/2014
2014-RIV-1117
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
9/22/2014
2014-RIV-1118
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
7/27/2014
2014-RIV-1119
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
8/1/2014
2014-RIV-1120
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
7/21/2014
2014-RIV-1121
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
8/28/2014
2014-RIV-1122
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
8/2/2013
2014-RIV-1123
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
7/30/2014
2014-RIV-1124
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
7/11/2014
2014-RIV-1125
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
8/6/2014
2014-RIV-1127
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
8/30/2014
2014-RIV-1128
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
8/4/2014
2014-RIV-1129
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
7/12/2014
2014-RIV-1130
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
8/3/2014
2014-RIV-1131
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
9/3/2014
2013-RIV-1132
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
8/10/2014
Date Granted
for
Postponement
of Service of
Inventory
Date of
Number
Compliance
of
With
Inventory
Inventory
Notices
Order
Sent
81
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 5
Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report
Date of
Order for
Service of
Inventory
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Name of
Applicant/Agency
Judge
Authorizing
Application
Riverside
(cont’d)
2014-RIV-1133
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
8/7/2014
2014-RIV-1134
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
8/7/2014
2013-RIV-1135
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
8/7/2014
2014-RIV-1136
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
8/8/2014
2014-RIV-1137
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
8/8/2014
2014-RIV-1138
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
8/8/2014
2014-RIV-1139
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
11/2/2014
2014-RIV-1141
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
8/8/2014
2014-RIV-1142
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
8/8/2014
2014-RIV-1143
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
8/10/2014
2014-RIV-1144
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
8/13/2014
2014-RIV-1145
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
8/13/2014
2014-RIV-1146
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
8/29/2014
2014-RIV-1148
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
8/14/2014
2014-RIV-1149
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
8/14/2014
2014-RIV-1150
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
9/9/2014
2014-RIV-1151
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
7/29/2014
2014-RIV-1152
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
7/18/2014
Date Granted
for
Postponement
of Service of
Inventory
Date of
Number
Compliance
of
With
Inventory
Inventory
Notices
Order
Sent
82
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 5
Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report
Date of
Order for
Service of
Inventory
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Name of
Applicant/Agency
Judge
Authorizing
Application
Riverside
(cont’d)
2014-RIV-1153
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
7/16/2014
2014-RIV-1154
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
(Inventory due)
9/12/2014
2014-RIV-1155
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
8/16/2014
2014-RIV-1156
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
8/17/2014
2014-RIV-1157
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
8/17/2014
2014-RIV-1158
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
8/17/2014
2014-RIV-1160
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
8/20/2014
2014-RIV-1161
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
7/29/2014
2014-RIV-1162
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
8/18/2014
2014-RIV-1163
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
8/18/2014
2014-RIV-1164
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
8/19/2014
2014-RIV-1165
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
8/21/2014
2014-RIV-1166
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
8/1/2014
2014-RIV-1167
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
(Inventory due)
9/18/2014
2014-RIV-1168
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
8/21/2014
2014-RIV-1169
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
8/20/2014
2014-RIV-1170
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
8/22/2014
2014-RIV-1171
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
8/28/2014
Date Granted
for
Postponement
of Service of
Inventory
Date of
Number
Compliance
of
With
Inventory
Inventory
Notices
Order
Sent
83
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 5
Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report
Date of
Order for
Service of
Inventory
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Name of
Applicant/Agency
Judge
Authorizing
Application
Riverside
(cont’d)
2014-RIV-1172
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
9/21/2014
2014-RIV-1173
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
8/23/2014
2014-RIV-1174
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
8/23/2014
2014-RIV-1175
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
7/1/2014
2014-RIV-1176
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
9/20/2014
2013-RIV-1177
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
8/25/2014
2014-RIV-1178
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
8/25/2014
2014-RIV-1179
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
8/25/2014
2014-RIV-1180
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
1/10/2015
2014-RIV-1181
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
8/24/2014
2014-RIV-1182
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
8/29/2014
2014-RIV-1183
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
9/28/2014
2014-RIV-1184
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
8/9/2014
2014-RIV-1185
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
9/29/2014
2014-RIV-1186
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
8/30/2014
2014-RIV-1187
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
8/29/2014
2014-RIV-1188
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
(Inventory due)
9/3/2014
2014-RIV-1190
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
8/30/2014
Date Granted
for
Postponement
of Service of
Inventory
Date of
Number
Compliance
of
With
Inventory
Inventory
Notices
Order
Sent
84
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 5
Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report
Date of
Order for
Service of
Inventory
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Name of
Applicant/Agency
Judge
Authorizing
Application
Riverside
(cont’d)
2014-RIV-1191
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
8/30/2014
2014-RIV-1192
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
8/30/2014
2014-RIV-1193
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
8/30/2014
2014-RIV-1194
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
9/3/2014
2014-RIV-1195
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
8/7/2014
2014-RIV-1196
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
9/10/2014
2014-RIV-1197
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
8/30/2014
2014-RIV-1198
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
9/28/2014
2014-RIV-1199
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
8/29/2014
2014-RIV-1200
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
8/21/2014
2014-RIV-1201
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
8/29/2014
2014-RIV-1202
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
8/29/2014
2014-RIV-1203
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
(Inventory due)
8/6/2014
2014-RIV-1204
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
8/28/2014
2014-RIV-1205
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
8/30/2014
2014-RIV-1206
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
8/30/2014
2014-RIV-1207
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
9/12/2014
2014-RIV-1208
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
9/12/2014
Date Granted
for
Postponement
of Service of
Inventory
Date of
Number
Compliance
of
With
Inventory
Inventory
Notices
Order
Sent
85
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 5
Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report
Date of
Order for
Service of
Inventory
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Name of
Applicant/Agency
Judge
Authorizing
Application
Riverside
(cont’d)
2014-RIV-1209
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
9/3/2014
2014-RIV-1210
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
9/9/2014
2014-RIV-1211
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
9/9/2014
2014-RIV-1212
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
9/14/2014
2014-RIV-1213
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
9/13/2014
2014-RIV-1214
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
1/4/2015
2014-RIV-1215
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
9/14/2014
2014-RIV-1216
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
9/14/2014
2014-RIV-1217
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
9/13/2014
2014-RIV-1218
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
1/4/2015
2014-RIV-1219
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
10/3/2014
2014-RIV-1220
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
3/21/2015
2014-RIV-1221
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
9/15/2014
2014-RIV-1222
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
9/20/2014
2014-RIV-1223
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
10/18/2014
2014-RIV-1224
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
9/21/2014
2014-RIV-1225
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
8/31/2014
2014-RIV-1226
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
9/20/2014
Date Granted
for
Postponement
of Service of
Inventory
Date of
Number
Compliance
of
With
Inventory
Inventory
Notices
Order
Sent
86
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 5
Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report
Date of
Order for
Service of
Inventory
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Name of
Applicant/Agency
Judge
Authorizing
Application
Riverside
(cont’d)
2014-RIV-1227
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
9/21/2014
2014-RIV-1229
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
9/21/2014
2014-RIV-1231
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
9/22/2014
2014-RIV-1232
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
9/6/2014
2014-RIV-1233
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
9/22/2014
2014-RIV-1234
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
10/1/2014
2014-RIV-1235
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
9/26/2014
2014-RIV-1236
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
9/26/2014
2014-RIV-1237
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
9/26/2014
2014-RIV-1238
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
9/26/2014
2014-RIV-1239
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
9/26/2014
2014-RIV-1240
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
9/26/2014
2014-RIV-1241
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
9/27/2014
2014-RIV-1242
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
9/27/2014
2014-RIV-1243
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
9/27/2014
2014-RIV-1244
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
9/27/2014
2014-RIV-1245
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
10/1/2014
2014-RIV-1246
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
9/17/2014
Date Granted
for
Postponement
of Service of
Inventory
Date of
Number
Compliance
of
With
Inventory
Inventory
Notices
Order
Sent
87
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 5
Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report
Date of
Order for
Service of
Inventory
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Name of
Applicant/Agency
Judge
Authorizing
Application
Riverside
(cont’d)
2014-RIV-1247
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
10/1/2014
2014-RIV-1248
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
10/3/2014
2014-RIV-1249
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
10/3/2014
2014-RIV-1250
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
10/26/2014
2014-RIV-1251
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
10/1/2014
2014-RIV-1252
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
9/28/2014
2014-RIV-1253
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
9/13/2014
2014-RIV-1254
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
10/8/2014
2014-RIV-1255
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
(Inventory due)
10/4/2014
2014-RIV-1256
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
10/6/2014
2014-RIV-1257
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
9/19/2014
2014-RIV-1258
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
10/12/2014
2014-RIV-1259
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
11/7/2014
2014-RIV-1260
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
11/7/2014
2014-RIV-1261
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
10/9/2014
2014-RIV-1262
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
(Inventory due)
9/26/2014
2014-RIV-1263
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
10/8/2014
2014-RIV-1264
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
10/1/2014
Date Granted
for
Postponement
of Service of
Inventory
Date of
Number
Compliance
of
With
Inventory
Inventory
Notices
Order
Sent
88
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 5
Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report
Date of
Order for
Service of
Inventory
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Name of
Applicant/Agency
Judge
Authorizing
Application
Riverside
(cont’d)
2014-RIV-1265
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
10/7/2014
2014-RIV-1266
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
10/10/2014
2014-RIV-1267
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
12/5/2014
2014-RIV-1268
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
10/15/2014
2014-RIV-1269
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
10/12/2014
2014-RIV-1270
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
10/7/2014
2014-RIV-1271
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
10/13/2014
2014-RIV-1272
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
10/13/2014
2014-RIV-1273
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
10/12/2014
2014-RIV-1275
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
10/15/2014
2014-RIV-1276
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
(Inventory due)
10/11/2014
2014-RIV-1277
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
10/13/2014
2014-RIV-1278
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
11/12/2014
2014-RIV-1280
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
10/7/2014
2014-RIV-1281
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
10/15/2014
2014-RIV-1282
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
10/19/2014
2014-RIV-1283
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
10/17/2014
2014-RIV-1284
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
10/17/2014
Date Granted
for
Postponement
of Service of
Inventory
Date of
Number
Compliance
of
With
Inventory
Inventory
Notices
Order
Sent
89
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 5
Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report
Date of
Order for
Service of
Inventory
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Name of
Applicant/Agency
Judge
Authorizing
Application
Riverside
(cont’d)
2014-RIV-1285
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
10/18/2014
2014-RIV-1286
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
10/29/2014
2014-RIV-1287
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
10/24/2014
2014-RIV-1288
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
10/31/2014
2014-RIV-1289
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
3/19/2015
2014-RIV-1290
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
12/28/2014
2014-RIV-1291
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
10/31/2014
2014-RIV-1292
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
12/12/2014
2014-RIV-1293
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
10/31/2014
2014-RIV-1294
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
11/30/2014
2013-RIV-1295
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
11/1/2014
2014-RIV-1296
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
11/1/2014
2014-RIV-1297
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
11/2/2014
2014-RIV-1298
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
10/3/2014
2014-RIV-1299
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
11/2/2014
2014-RIV-1300
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
12/5/2014
2014-RIV-1301
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
11/1/2014
2014-RIV-1302
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
11/8/2014
Date Granted
for
Postponement
of Service of
Inventory
Date of
Number
Compliance
of
With
Inventory
Inventory
Notices
Order
Sent
90
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 5
Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report
Date of
Order for
Service of
Inventory
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Name of
Applicant/Agency
Judge
Authorizing
Application
Riverside
(cont’d)
2014-RIV-1303
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
11/8/2014
2014-RIV-1304
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
11/8/2014
2014-RIV-1305
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
11/7/2014
2014-RIV-1306
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
11/7/2014
2014-RIV-1307
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
11/8/2014
2014-RIV-1308
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
12/16/2014
2014-RIV-1309
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
(Inventory due)
11/13/2014
2014-RIV-1310
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
11/8/2014
2014-RIV-1311
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
10/24/2014
2014-RIV-1312
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
12/15/2014
2014-RIV-1313
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
11/16/2014
2014-RIV-1315
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
11/21/2014
2014-RIV-1316
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
11/13/2014
2014-RIV-1317
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
11/16/2014
2014-RIV-1319
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
11/5/2014
2014-RIV-1320
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
11/13/2014
2014-RIV-1321
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
11/1/2014
2014-RIV-1322
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
11/21/2014
Date Granted
for
Postponement
of Service of
Inventory
Date of
Number
Compliance
of
With
Inventory
Inventory
Notices
Order
Sent
91
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 5
Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report
Date of
Order for
Service of
Inventory
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Name of
Applicant/Agency
Judge
Authorizing
Application
Riverside
(cont’d)
2014-RIV-1323
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
11/22/2014
2014-RIV-1324
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
11/21/2014
2014-RIV-1326
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
11/12/2014
2014-RIV-1327
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
11/4/2014
2014-RIV-1328
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
11/21/2014
2014-RIV-1329
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
11/22/2014
2014-RIV-1330
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
(Inventory due)
11/21/2014
2014-RIV-1331
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
11/23/2014
2014-RIV-1332
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
12/20/2014
2014-RIV-1333
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
11/24/2014
2014-RIV-1334
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
11/24/2014
2014-RIV-1335
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
11/27/2014
2014-RIV-1336
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
11/30/2014
2014-RIV-1337
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
11/27/2014
2014-RIV-1338
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
11/27/2014
2014-RIV-1339
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
12/25/2014
2014-RIV-1340
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
11/29/2014
2014-RIV-1341
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
12/3/2014
Date Granted
for
Postponement
of Service of
Inventory
Date of
Number
Compliance
of
With
Inventory
Inventory
Notices
Order
Sent
92
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 5
Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report
Date of
Order for
Service of
Inventory
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Name of
Applicant/Agency
Judge
Authorizing
Application
Riverside
(cont’d)
2014-RIV-1342
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
11/30/2014
2014-RIV-1343
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
11/28/2014
2014-RIV-1344
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
1/4/2015
2014-RIV-1345
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
1/24/2015
2014-RIV-1346
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
11/24/2014
2014-RIV-1347
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
12/2/2014
2014-RIV-1348
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
11/30/2014
2014-RIV-1349
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
11/30/2014
2014-RIV-1350
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
11/13/2014
2014-RIV-1351
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
1/4/2015
2014-RIV-1352
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
12/4/2014
2014-RIV-1353
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
12/4/2014
2014-RIV-1354
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
12/4/2014
2014-RIV-1355
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
12/5/2014
2014-RIV-1356
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
12/18/2014
2014-RIV-1357
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
11/15/2014
2014-RIV-1358
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
12/6/2014
2014-RIV-1359
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
12/2/2014
Date Granted
for
Postponement
of Service of
Inventory
Date of
Number
Compliance
of
With
Inventory
Inventory
Notices
Order
Sent
93
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 5
Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report
Date of
Order for
Service of
Inventory
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Name of
Applicant/Agency
Judge
Authorizing
Application
Riverside
(cont’d)
2014-RIV-1360
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
12/5/2014
2014-RIV-1361
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
12/5/2014
2014-RIV-1362
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
11/26/2014
2014-RIV-1363
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
12/5/2014
2014-RIV-1364
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
12/5/2014
2014-RIV-1365
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
1/10/2015
2014-RIV-1366
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
12/9/2014
2014-RIV-1367
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
12/13/2014
2014-RIV-1368
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
12/11/2014
2014-RIV-1369
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
12/11/2014
2014-RIV-1370
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
12/12/2014
2014-RIV-1371
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
12/16/2014
2014-RIV-1372
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
2/15/2014
2014-RIV-1373
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
1/15/2015
2014-RIV-1374
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
12/20/2014
2014-RIV-1375
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
12/21/2014
2014-RIV-1376
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
12/23/2014
2014-RIV-1377
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
1/18/2015
Date Granted
for
Postponement
of Service of
Inventory
Date of
Number
Compliance
of
With
Inventory
Inventory
Notices
Order
Sent
94
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 5
Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report
Date of
Order for
Service of
Inventory
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Name of
Applicant/Agency
Judge
Authorizing
Application
Riverside
(cont’d)
2014-RIV-1378
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
12/20/2014
2014-RIV-1379
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
12/24/2014
2014-RIV-1380
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
12/24/2014
2014-RIV-1381
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
12/25/2014
2014-RIV-1382
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
12/26/2014
2014-RIV-1383
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
12/11/2014
2014-RIV-1384
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
12/21/2014
2014-RIV-1385
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
12/15/2014
2014-RIV-1386
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
12/26/2014
2014-RIV-1387
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
1/17/2015
2014-RIV-1388
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
12/27/2014
2014-RIV-1389
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
12/5/2014
2014-RIV-1390
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
12/25/2014
2014-RIV-1392
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
12/25/2014
2014-RIV-1393
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
1/25/2015
2014-RIV-1394
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
1/25/2015
2014-RIV-1395
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
1/2/2015
2014-RIV-1396
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
1/4/2015
Date Granted
for
Postponement
of Service of
Inventory
Date of
Number
Compliance
of
With
Inventory
Inventory
Notices
Order
Sent
95
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 5
Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report
Date of
Order for
Service of
Inventory
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Name of
Applicant/Agency
Judge
Authorizing
Application
Riverside
(cont’d)
2014-RIV-1398
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
1/3/2015
2014-RIV-1399
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
1/3/2015
2014-RIV-1400
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
1/3/2015
2014-RIV-1401
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
12/16/2014
2014-RIV-1402
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
2/12/2015
2014-RIV-1403
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
1/8/2015
2014-RIV-1404
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
1/22/2014
2014-RIV-1405
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
1/8/2015
2014-RIV-1406
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
1/17/2015
2014-RIV-1407
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
1/10/2015
2014-RIV-1408
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
1/10/2015
2014-RIV-1409
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
1/10/2015
2014-RIV-1410
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
2/9/2014
2014-RIV-1411
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
1/10/2015
2014-RIV-1412
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
1/10/2015
2014-RIV-1413
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
1/18/2015
2014-RIV-1414
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
1/8/2015
2014-RIV-1415
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
1/4/2015
Date Granted
for
Postponement
of Service of
Inventory
Date of
Number
Compliance
of
With
Inventory
Inventory
Notices
Order
Sent
96
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 5
Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report
Date of
Order for
Service of
Inventory
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Name of
Applicant/Agency
Judge
Authorizing
Application
Riverside
(cont’d)
2014-RIV-1416
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
1/16/2014
2014-RIV-1417
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
1/16/2015
2014-RIV-1418
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
1/16/2015
2014-RIV-1419
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
1/17/2015
2014-RIV-1420
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
1/17/2015
2014-RIV-1421
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
1/17/2015
2014-RIV-1423
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
1/17/2015
2014-RIV-1424
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
2/19/2014
2014-RIV-1425
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
1/18/2015
2014-RIV-1426
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
1/21/2014
2014-RIV-1427
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
1/24/2015
2014-RIV-1428
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
2/21/2014
2014-RIV-1429
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
2/21/2014
2014-RIV-1430
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
2/22/2014
2014-RIV-1431
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
1/5/2015
2014-RIV-1432
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
1/25/2015
2014-RIV-1433
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
1/25/2015
2014-RIV-1434
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
12/25/2015
Date Granted
for
Postponement
of Service of
Inventory
Date of
Number
Compliance
of
With
Inventory
Inventory
Notices
Order
Sent
97
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 5
Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report
Date of
Order for
Service of
Inventory
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Name of
Applicant/Agency
Judge
Authorizing
Application
Riverside
(cont’d)
2014-RIV-1435
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
1/4/2015
2014-RIV-1436
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
1/28/2015
2014-RIV-1437
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
1/26/2015
2014-RIV-1438
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
1/30/2015
2014-RIV-1439
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
1/30/2014
2014-RIV-1440
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
3/5/2015
2014-RIV-1441
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
1/25/2015
2014-RIV-1442
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
1/25/2015
2014-RIV-1443
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
1/3/2015
2014-RIV-1444
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
(Inventory due)
12/24/2014
2014-RIV-1445
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
1/3/2015
2014-RIV-1446
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
2/4/2014
2014-RIV-1447
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
1/22/2015
2014-RIV-1449
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
2/2/2015
2014-RIV-1451
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
1/21/2015
2014-RIV-1452
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
2/4/2015
2014-RIV-1453
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
2/7/2015
2014-RIV-1455
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
2/7/2015
Date Granted
for
Postponement
of Service of
Inventory
Date of
Number
Compliance
of
With
Inventory
Inventory
Notices
Order
Sent
98
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 5
Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report
Date of
Order for
Service of
Inventory
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Name of
Applicant/Agency
Judge
Authorizing
Application
Riverside
(cont’d)
2014-RIV-1456
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
3/5/2015
2014-RIV-1457
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
1/23/2014
2014-RIV-1458
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
3/5/2015
2014-RIV-1459
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
3/5/2015
2014-RIV-1460
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
3/5/2015
2014-RIV-1461
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
2/6/2015
2014-RIV-1463
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
2/8/2015
2014-RIV-1464
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
2/4/2015
2014-RIV-1466
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
3/7/2015
2014-RIV-1467
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
2/7/2014
2014-RIV-1468
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
2/7/2015
2014-RIV-1470
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
2/8/2015
2014-RIV-1471
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
2/8/2015
2014-RIV-1472
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
2/13/2015
2014-RIV-1473
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
2/14/2015
2014-RIV-1474
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
2/14/2015
2014-RIV-1475
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
2/4/2015
2014-RIV-1476
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
2/14/2015
Date Granted
for
Postponement
of Service of
Inventory
Date of
Number
Compliance
of
With
Inventory
Inventory
Notices
Order
Sent
99
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 5
Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report
Date of
Order for
Service of
Inventory
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Name of
Applicant/Agency
Judge
Authorizing
Application
Riverside
(cont’d)
2014-RIV-1477
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
2/4/2015
2014-RIV-1478
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
2/4/2015
2014-RIV-1479
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
3/13/2015
2014-RIV-1480
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
2/1/2015
2014-RIV-1481
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
2/14/2015
2014-RIV-1482
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
2/4/2015
2014-RIV-1483
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
2/14/2014
2013-RIV-1484
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
2/20/2015
2014-RIV-1485
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
2/20/2015
2014-RIV-1486
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
2/22/2014
2014-RIV-1487
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
2/28/2015
2014-RIV-1488
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
2/22/2014
2014-RIV-1489
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
2/26/2015
2014-RIV-1490
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
2/26/2015
2014-RIV-1491
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
2/27/2015
2014-RIV-1492
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
2/27/2015
2014-RIV-1493
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
2/27/2015
2014-RIV-1494
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
3/21/2015
Date Granted
for
Postponement
of Service of
Inventory
Date of
Number
Compliance
of
With
Inventory
Inventory
Notices
Order
Sent
100
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 5
Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report
Date of
Order for
Service of
Inventory
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Name of
Applicant/Agency
Judge
Authorizing
Application
Riverside
(cont’d)
2014-RIV-1495
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
2/26/2015
2014-RIV-1496
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
2/25/2015
2014-RIV-1497
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
2/27/2015
2014-RIV-1498
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
2/19/2014
2014-RIV-1499
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
2/26/2015
2014-RIV-1500
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
2/25/2015
2014-RIV-1501
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
2/27/2014
2014-RIV-1502
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
2/26/2015
2014-RIV-1503
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
2/27/2015
2014-RIV-1504
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
2/27/2015
2014-RIV-1505
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
2/27/2015
2014-RIV-1506
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
2/27/2015
2014-RIV-1507
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
3/1/2015
2014-RIV-1508
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
3/2/2015
2014-RIV-1510
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
3/1/2015
2014-RIV-1511
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
3/4/2015
2014-RIV-1512
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
3/1/2015
2014-RIV-1513
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
3/1/2015
Date Granted
for
Postponement
of Service of
Inventory
Date of
Number
Compliance
of
With
Inventory
Inventory
Notices
Order
Sent
101
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 5
Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report
Date of
Order for
Service of
Inventory
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Name of
Applicant/Agency
Judge
Authorizing
Application
Riverside
(cont’d)
2014-RIV-1514
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
3/22/2015
2014-RIV-1515
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
3/6/2015
2014-RIV-1516
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
3/5/2015
2014-RIV-1517
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
3/10/2015
2014-RIV-1518
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
3/5/2015
2014-RIV-1519
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
3/5/2015
2014-RIV-1520
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
3/5/2015
2014-RIV-1521
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
2/21/2015
2014-RIV-1522
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
3/12/2015
2014-RIV-1523
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
3/5/2015
2014-RIV-1524
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
3/4/2015
2014-RIV-1525
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
3/6/2015
2014-RIV-1526
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
3/7/2015
2014-RIV-1527
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
3/1/2015
2014-RIV-1528
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
3/7/2015
2014-RIV-1529
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
3/5/2015
2014-RIV-1530
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
3/6/2015
2014-RIV-1533
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
3/7/2015
Date Granted
for
Postponement
of Service of
Inventory
Date of
Number
Compliance
of
With
Inventory
Inventory
Notices
Order
Sent
102
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 5
Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report
Date of
Order for
Service of
Inventory
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Name of
Applicant/Agency
Judge
Authorizing
Application
Riverside
(cont’d)
2014-RIV-1534
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
3/9/2015
2014-RIV-1535
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
3/7/2015
2014-RIV-1538
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
3/9/2015
2014-RIV-1539
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
3/7/2015
2014-RIV-1540
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
3/12/2015
2014-RIV-1541
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
3/30/2015
2014-RIV-1542
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
3/12/2015
2014-RIV-1544
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
3/1/2015
2014-RIV-1545
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
3/11/2015
2014-RIV-1546
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
3/16/2015
2014-RIV-1547
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
3/12/2015
2014-RIV-1549
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
3/1/2015
2014-RIV-1550
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
3/12/2015
2014-RIV-1551
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
3/18/2015
2014-RIV-1552
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
3/18/2015
2014-RIV-1553
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
3/18/2015
2014-RIV-1554
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
3/18/2015
2014-RIV-1555
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
3/18/2015
Date Granted
for
Postponement
of Service of
Inventory
Date of
Number
Compliance
of
With
Inventory
Inventory
Notices
Order
Sent
103
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 5
Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report
Date of
Order for
Service of
Inventory
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Name of
Applicant/Agency
Judge
Authorizing
Application
Riverside
(cont’d)
2014-RIV-1557
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
3/18/2015
2014-RIV-1558
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
3/18/2015
2014-RIV-1559
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
3/18/2015
2014-RIV-1561
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
3/21/2015
2014-RIV-1563
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
3/21/2015
2014-RIV-1565
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
3/20/2015
2014-RIV-1568
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
3/21/2015
2014-RIV-1569
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
3/21/2015
2014-RIV-1570
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
3/21/2014
2014-RIV-1571
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
3/21/2015
2014-RIV-1572
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
3/21/2015
2014-RIV-1573
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
3/24/2015
2014-RIV-1574
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
3/2/2015
2014-RIV-1575
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
3/20/2015
2014-RIV-1576
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
3/20/2015
2014-RIV-1577
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
3/23/2015
2014-RIV-1581
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
3/22/2015
2014-RIV-1582
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
3/12/2015
Date Granted
for
Postponement
of Service of
Inventory
Date of
Number
Compliance
of
With
Inventory
Inventory
Notices
Order
Sent
104
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 5
Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report
Date of
Order for
Service of
Inventory
Date Granted
for
Postponement
of Service of
Inventory
Date of
Number
Compliance
of
With
Inventory
Inventory
Notices
Order
Sent
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Name of
Applicant/Agency
Judge
Authorizing
Application
Riverside
(cont’d)
2014-RIV-1586
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
3/4/2015
2014-RIV-1587
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
3/10/2015
2014-RIV-1589
Zellerbach, DA
Hon. Hernandez
3/19/2015
2014-SAC-54
Grippi, CDDA
Hon. White
5/14/2014
5/1/2014
213
2014-SAC-56
Grippi, CDDA
Hon. White
8/26/2014
12/24/2014
24
2014-SAC-57
Grippi, CDDA
Hon. White
11/18/2014
12/24/2014
39
2014-SAC-59
Grippi, CDDA
Hon. White
11/18/2014
12/24/2014
39
2014-SAC-60
Grippi, CDDA
Hon. White
11/19/2014
11/18/2014
30
2014-SAC-61
Grippi, CDDA
Hon. Savage
12/7/2014
12/24/2014
39
San Bernardino 2014-SBD-538
Roth, ADA
Hon. Pace
4/4/2014
2014-SBD-539
Ramos, DA
Hon. Pace
4/4/2014
2014-SBD-540
Fermin, ADA
Hon. Harrison
4/28/2014
2014-SBD-542
Ramos, DA
Hon. Pace
7/4/2014
2014-SBD-543
Ramos, DA
Hon. Pace
8/22/2014
9/4/2014
2014-SBD-544
Ramos, DA
Hon. Harrison
9/5/2014
9/4/2014
2014-SBD-545
Fermin, ADA
Hon. Pace
8/11/2014
5/30/2014
3
2014-SBD-546
Fermin, ADA
Hon. Pace
8/11/2014
2014-SBD-547
Fermin, ADA
Hon. Pace
8/15/2014
8/11/2014
14
Sacramento
105
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 5
Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report
Date Granted
for
Postponement
of Service of
Inventory
Date of
Number
Compliance
of
With
Inventory
Inventory
Notices
Order
Sent
Name of
Applicant/Agency
Judge
Authorizing
Application
Date of
Order for
Service of
Inventory
San Bernardino
2014-SBD-548
(cont’d)
Ramos, DA
Hon. Pace
8/29/2014
2014-SBD-549
Ramos, DA
Hon. Pace
9/3/2014
2014-SBD-550
Fermin, ADA
Hon. Pace
9/12/2014
9/4/2014
4
2014-SBD-551
Fermin, ADA
Hon. Pace
9/16/2014
9/4/2014
5
2014-SBD-552
Fermin, ADA
Hon. Pace
10/17/2014
2014-SBD-553
Ramos, DA
Hon. Pace
11/14/2014
2014-SBD-554
Fermin, ADA
Hon. Pace
10/24/2014
2014-SBD-555
Fermin, ADA
Hon. Pace
11/3/2014
12/19/2014
2
2014-SBD-557
Ramos, DA
Hon. Pace
11/14/2014
2014-SBD-558
Ramos, DA
Hon. Pace
12/12/2014
2014-SBD-559
Fermin, ADA
Hon. Pace
1/1/2015
2014-SBD-560
Fermin, ADA
Hon. Pace
12/22/2014
12/17/2014
4
2014-SBD-561
Ramos, DA
Hon. Pace
2/16/2015
1/7/2015
22
2014-SBD-562
Ramos, DA
Hon. Pace
1/23/2015
2014-SBD-563
Fermin, ADA
Hon. Pace
2/20/2015
2014-SBD-564
Ramos, DA
Hon. Pace
2/20/2015
1/7/2015
47
2014-SBD-566
Ramos, DA
Hon. Pace
3/13/2015
2014-SBD-567
Fermin, ADA
Hon. Pace
2/16/2015
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
9/4/2014
106
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 5
Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report
Name of
Applicant/Agency
Judge
Authorizing
Application
Date of
Order for
Service of
Inventory
San Bernardino
2014-SBD-569
(cont’d)
Ramos, DA
Hon. Pace
2/25/2015
2014-SBD-570
Ramos, DA
Hon. Nakata
3/15/2014
2014-SBD-571
Ramos, DA
Hon. Nakata
3/13/2015
2014-SD-180
Hill, ASCA
Hon. Rogers
2/20/2015
2014-SD-181
Sherman, ASCA
Hon. Danielsen
2/25/2014
2014-SD-182
Tomaski, ASAC
Hon. Fraser
2014-SD-183
Sherman, ASAC
2014-SD-185
Reporting
Jurisdiction
San Diego
San Joaquin
EICOS No.
Date Granted
for
Postponement
of Service of
Inventory
8/6/2014
Date of
Number
Compliance
of
With
Inventory
Inventory
Notices
Order
Sent
8/6/2014
15
8/5/2014
8/5/2014
151
Hon. Rogers
8/11/2014
8/11/2014
111
Sherman, ASAC
Hon. Rogers
8/11/2014
8/11/2014
111
2014-SD-186
Sherman, ASAC
Hon. Rogers
8/19/2014
8/19/2014
290
2014-SD-187
Sherman, ASAC
Hon. Rogers
8/19/2014
8/19/2014
290
2014-SD-188
Sherman, ASAC
Hon. Rogers
8/1/2014
8/19/2014
290
2014-SD-189
Sherman, ASAC
Hon. Rogers
8/5/2014
8/5/2014
151
2014-SD-190
Sherman, ASAC
Hon. Rogers
8/5/2014
8/5/2014
151
2014-SD-191
Redman, Chief of Police
Hon. Rogers
9/4/2014
9/5/2014
64
2014-SD-192
Gore, Sheriff
Hon. Fraser
2/26/2015
8/26/2014
2014-SD-193
Gore, Sheriff
Hon. Rogers
2/26/2015
8/26/2014
2014-SD-195
Redman, Chief of Police
Hon. Rogers
9/4/2014
6/3/2014
9/5/2014
64
2015-SJ-36
Willett, DA
Hon. Guiliani
7/2/2014
7/2/2014
107
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 5
Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report
Date of
Order for
Service of
Inventory
Date Granted
for
Postponement
of Service of
Inventory
Date of
Number
Compliance
of
With
Inventory
Inventory
Notices
Order
Sent
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Name of
Applicant/Agency
Judge
Authorizing
Application
San Joaquin
(cont’d)
2015-SJ-37
Willett, DA
Hon. Guiliani
9/4/2014
3/1/2014
2015-SJ-38
Willett, DA
Hon. Guiliani
9/7/2014
9/7/2014
2015-SJ-39
Willett, DA
Hon. Guiliani
9/12/2014
9/12/2014
2015-SJ-40
Willett, DA
Hon. Guilliani
9/18/2014
9/18/2014
2015-SJ-41
Willett, DA
Hon. Guilliani
12/10/2014
12/10/2014
2015-SJ-42
Willett, DA
Hon. Guilliani
11/4/2014
11/14/2014
2015-SJ-43
Willett, DA
Hon. Guilliani
11/28/2014
11/28/2014
2015-SJ-44
Willett, DA
Hon. Guilliani
9/3/2014
9/3/2014
2015-SJ-45
Willett, DA
Hon. Guiliani
12/10/2014
12/10/2014
2015-SJ-46
Willett, DA
Hon. Guiliani
12/10/2014
12/10/2014
2015-SJ-47
Willett, DA
Hon. Guilliani
12/10/2014
12/10/2014
2015-SJ-48
Willett, DA
Hon. Guilliani
12/19/2014
12/19/2014
2015-SJ-49
Willett, DA
Hon. Guilliani
12/3/2014
12/3/2014
2015-SJ-50
Willett, DA
Hon. Guilliani
12/10/2014
12/10/2014
2015-SJ-51
Willett, DA
Hon. Guilliani
12/10/2014
12/10/2014
2015-SJ-52
Willett, DA
Hon. Guilliani
9/10/2014
9/10/2014
2015-SJ-53
Willett, DA
Hon. Guilliani
12/19/2014
12/19/2014
2014-SBA-46
Dudley, DA
Hon. Kelly
1/9/2015
Santa Barbara
0
11/4/2014
108
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 5
Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report
Date of
Order for
Service of
Inventory
Date Granted
for
Postponement
of Service of
Inventory
Date of
Number
Compliance
of
With
Inventory
Inventory
Notices
Order
Sent
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Name of
Applicant/Agency
Judge
Authorizing
Application
Santa Barbara
(cont’d)
2014-SBA-47
Dudley, DA
Hon. Kelly
9/9/2014
9/9/2014
35
2014-SBA-48
Dudley, DA
Hon. Kelly
9/9/2014
9/9/2014
35
2014-SBA-49
Dudley, DA
Hon. Kelly
9/9/2014
9/9/2014
35
2014-SCL-71
Rosen, DA
Hon. Barrett
9/22/2014
9/22/2014
34
2014-SCL-72
Rosen, DA
Hon. Barrett
9/11/2014
9/11/2014
34
2014-SCL-74
Rosen, DA
Hon. Barrett
1/12/2015
10/12/2014
2014-SCL-75
Rosen, DA
Hon. Barrett
1/12/2015
10/12/2014
2014-SCL-76
Rosen, DA
Hon. Barrett
(Inventory due)
5/17/2014
9/22/2014
154
2014-SCL-77
Rosen, DA
Hon. Barrett
(Inventory due)
4/21/2014
9/22/2014
154
2014-SCL-78
Rosen, DA
Hon. Barrett
(Inventory due)
6/1/2014
9/22/2014
154
2014-SCL-79
Rosen, DA
Hon. Barrett
(Inventory due)
7/11/2014
9/22/2014
154
2014-SCL-80
Rosen, DA
Hon. Barrett
(Inventory due)
7/22/2014
9/22/2014
154
2014-SCL-81
Rosen, DA
Hon. Barrett
1/12/2015
10/12/2014
2014-SCL-82
Rosen, DA
Hon. Barrett
1/12/2015
10/12/2014
2014-SCL-83
Rosen, DA
Hon. Barrett
2/28/2015
2014-SCL-84
Rosen, DA
Hon. Barrett
(Inventory due)
12/28/2014
12/4/2014
119
2014-SON-6
Ravitch, DA
Hon. Gnoss
11/7/2014
11/25/2014
24
2014-SON-7
Ravitch, DA
Hon. Gnoss
5/18/2014
5/5/2014
27
Santa Clara
Sonoma
11/20/2014
109
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 5
Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report
Date of
Order for
Service of
Inventory
Date Granted
for
Postponement
of Service of
Inventory
5/7/2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Name of
Applicant/Agency
Judge
Authorizing
Application
Stanislaus
2014-STA-63
Fladager, DA
Hon. Ashley
8/4/2014
2014-STA-64
Fladager, DA
Hon. Ashley
6/19/2014
2014-STA-65
Fladager, DA
Hon. Ashley
8/4/2014
2014-STA-67
Fladager, DA
Hon. Ashley
7/11/2014
2014-STA-68
Kreis, Agent
Hon. Ashley
8/4/2014
2014-STA-69
Fladager, DA
Hon. Ashley
2014-STA-70
Fladager, DA
2014-STA-71
Tulare
Date of
Number
Compliance
of
With
Inventory
Inventory
Notices
Order
Sent
7/22/2014
14
9/5/2014
2
7/22/2014
12
7/11/2014
45
7/22/2014
9
6/10/2014
9/5/2014
2
Hon. Ashley
11/22/2014
10/8/2014
18
Fladager, DA
Hon. Ashley
11/17/2014
10/8/2014
18
2014-STA-72
Fladager, DA
Hon. Ashley
11/22/2014
10/8/2014
18
2014-STA-73
Fladager, DA
Hon. Ashley
10/27/2014
10/8/2014
18
2014-STA-74
Fladager, DA
Hon. Ashley
10/25/2014
10/8/2014
18
2014-STA-75
Fladager, DA
Hon. Ashley
11/22/2014
10/8/2014
18
2014-STA-76
Fladager, DA
Hon. Ashley
12/31/2014
10/8/2014
18
2014-STA-77
Fladager, DA
Hon. Ashley
12/31/2014
10/8/2014
18
2014-TUL-8
Underwood, ADA
Hon. Montejano
(Inventory due)
1/25/2015
2014-TUL-9
Underwood, ADA
Hon. Montejano
(Inventory due)
1/15/2015
2014-TUL-10
Underwood, ADA
Hon. Montejano
(Inventory due)
1/16/2015
2014-TUL-11
Underwood, ADA
Hon. Montejano
(Inventory due)
9/5/2014
5/7/2014
5/7/2014
110
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 5
Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report
Date of
Order for
Service of
Inventory
Date Granted
for
Postponement
of Service of
Inventory
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Name of
Applicant/Agency
Judge
Authorizing
Application
Tulare
(cont’d)
2014-TUL-12
Underwood, ADA
Hon. Montejano
(Inventory due)
10/30/2014
2014-TUL-13
Underwood, ADA
Hon. Montejano
(Inventory due)
12/17/2014
2014-TUL-14
Underwood, ADA
Hon. Montejano
(Inventory due)
12/11/2014
2014-TUL-15
Underwood, ADA
Hon. Montejano
(Inventory due)
12/11/2014
2014-TUL-16
Underwood, ADA
Hon. Montejano
(Inventory due)
1/16/2015
2014-TUL-18
Underwood, ADA
Hon. Ferguson
(Inventory due)
11/20/2014
2015-TUL-19
Underwood, ADA
Hon. Ferguson
(Inventory due)
9/18/2014
2013-VE-74
Totten, DA
Hon. DeNoce
11/2/2014
8/29/2014
2014-VE-84
Totten, DA
Hon. DeNoce
1/11/2015
10/17/2014
2014-VE-85
Totten, DA
Hon. DeNoce
5/8/2014
2014-VE-86
Totten, DA
Hon. DeNoce
(Inventory due)
5/15/2014
2014-VE-87
Maurizi, CADA
Hon. Ayers
6/1/2014
2014-VE-88
Totten, DA
Hon. O'Neill
(Inventory due)
6/13/2014
2014-VE-89
Totten, DA
Hon. DeNoce
6/18/2014
2014-VE-90
Totten, DA
Hon. DeNoce
(Inventory due)
6/26/2014
3/23/2015
2014-VE-91
Maurizi, CADA
Hon. Back
(Inventory due)
7/14/2014
4/11/2015
2014-VE-92
Totten, DA
Hon. DeNoce
6/28/2014
2014-VE-93
Maurizi, CADA
Hon. DeNoce
(Inventory due)
7/2/2014
Ventura
Date of
Number
Compliance
of
With
Inventory
Inventory
Notices
Order
Sent
5/7/2014
4/11/2015
5/28/2014
10
6/13/2014
36
5/28/2014
4
4/11/2015
3/31/2015
111
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 5
Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report
Date of
Order for
Service of
Inventory
Date Granted
for
Postponement
of Service of
Inventory
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Name of
Applicant/Agency
Judge
Authorizing
Application
Ventura
(cont’d)
2014-VE-94
Maurizi, CADA
Hon. O'Neill
(Inventory due)
8/12/2014
4/11/2015
2014-VE-95
Totten, DA
Hon. Ayers
(Inventory due)
9/10/2014
4/11/2015
2014-VE-96
Totten, DA
Hon. Back
(Inventory due)
9/27/2014
3/20/2015
2014-VE-97
Totten, DA
Hon. Ayers
(Inventory due)
10/18/2014
4/11/2015
2014-VE-98
Maurizi, CADA
Hon. Back
(Inventory due)
10/23/2014
2/5/2015
2014-VE-99
Maurizi, CADA
Hon. White
(Inventory due)
11/19/2014
3/1/2015
2014-VE-100
Maurizi, CADA
Hon. Ayers
(Inventory due)
11/22/2014
4/11/2015
2014-VE-101
Totten, DA
Hon. Back
(Inventory due)
12/8/2014
4/3/2014
2014-VE-102
Totten, DA
Hon. O'Neill
(Inventory due)
11/26/2014
4/11/2015
2014-VE-103
Totten, DA
Hon. DeNoce
(Inventory due)
12/26/2014
3/1/2015
2014-VE-104
Frawley, CDDA
Hon. O'Neill
1/27/2015
2014-VE-105
Frawley, CDDA
Hon. White
4/13/2015
2014-VE-106
Totten, DA
Hon. Back
2/1/2015
2014-VE-109
Totten, DA
Hon. White
1/20/2015
2014-VE-110
Totten, DA
Hon. Back
2/7/2014
2014-VE-111
Totten, DA
Hon. White
2/12/2015
2014-VE-113
Totten, DA
Hon. DeNoce
3/12/2015
Date of
Number
Compliance
of
With
Inventory
Inventory
Notices
Order
Sent
112
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 6
Costs of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Alameda
2014-ALA-19
2014-ALA-20
Nature and Quantity
of
Personnel Used
2 monitors; 1 wire room
manager
1 monitor; 1 wire room
manager
3,200
81,200
15,600
1,600
17,200
1,600
40,600
2014-ALA-28
1 monitor; 1 wire room
manager
35,200
1,600
36,800
2014-ALA-29
1 monitor; 1 wire room
manager
40,300
1,600
41,900
2014-ALA-30
1 monitor; 1 wire room
manager
23,400
1,600
25,000
2014-ALA-31
1 monitor; 1 wire room
manager
39,000
1,600
40,600
29,900
1,600
31,500
29,900
1,600
31,500
15,600
1,600
17,200
345,900
17,600
363,500
1 monitor; 1 wire room
manager
1 monitor; 1 wire room
manager
1 monitor; 1 wire room
manager
Alameda Total
2014-CO-1
Cost not available
2014-CO-2
2014-CC-8
8 investigators
45,787
6,950
52,737
5,000
5,000
10,000
2014-CC-9
Costs related to CCCDA 14-001
2014-CC-10
Costs related to CCCDA 14-006
2014-CC-11
Costs related to CCCDA 14-006
Contra Costa Total
4
78,000
(Personnel +
Resource) 4
39,000
2014-ALA-34
El Dorado Total
(Installation Fees,
Supplies,
Equipment, etc.)
1 monitor, 1 wire room
manager
2014-ALA-33
El Dorado
Total Cost ($)
Personnel Cost ($)
2014-ALA-24
2014-ALA-32
Contra Costa
Resource Cost ($)
50,787
11,950
62,737
2014-ED-1
25
34,935
50
34,985
2014-ED-2
31
36,700
900
37,600
71,635
950
72,585
Totals per electronic wiretap and per county do not delineate between sources of funds (county, state, federal).
113
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 6
Costs of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Fresno
2014-FR-6
Nature and Quantity
of
Personnel Used
Resource Cost ($)
Personnel Cost ($)
(Installation Fees,
Supplies,
Equipment, etc.)
66,125
5,092
2014-FR-7
Costs related to 2013-06
2014-FR-8
Costs related to 2013-06
2014-FR-9
2014-FR-11
agents; installers;
monitors
agents; installer;
monitor
Total Cost ($)
(Personnel +
Resource) 4
71,217
49,516
1,400
50,916
49,516
1,400
50,916
2014-FR-13
agents; installers;
monitors
64,736
1,400
66,136
2014-FR-14
agents; installer;
monitor
53,312
1,400
54,712
2014-FR-15
agents; install; monitor
64,736
1,400
66,136
2014-FR-16
agents; intaller; monitor
140,896
1,400
142,296
95,200
2,800
98,000
114,240
2,800
117,040
2014-FR-17
2014-FR-18
agents; installer,
monitor
agents; installer;
monitors
2014-FR-19
1 special agent sup.;
6 special agents
18,925
1,500
20,425
2014-FR-20
1 special agent sup.;
6 special agents
18,925
1,500
20,425
2014-FR-21
1 special agent sup.;
6 special agents
18,925
1,500
20,425
0
500
500
2014-FR-22
2014-FR-23
1 special agent sup.;
6 special agents
18,925
1,500
20,425
2014-FR-24
1 special agent sup.;
6 special agents
18,925
1,500
20,425
18,925
1,500
20,425
18,925
1,500
20,425
2014-FR-25
2014-FR-26
1 special agent sup.;
6 special agents
1 special agent sup.;
6 special agents
2014-FR-27
1 special agent sup.;
6 special agents
18,925
1,500
20,425
2014-FR-28
1 special agent sup.;
6 special agents
18,925
1,500
20,425
114
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 6
Costs of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Fresno
(cont’d)
2014-FR-29
2014-FR-30
2014-FR-31
Nature and Quantity
of
Personnel Used
1 special agent sup.;
6 special agents
1 special agent sup.;
6 special agents
1 special agent sup.;
6 special agents
Fresno Total
Kern
Total Cost ($)
Personnel Cost ($)
(Installation Fees,
Supplies,
Equipment, etc.)
18,925
1,500
20,425
18,925
1,500
20,425
18,925
1,500
20,425
925,377
37,592
962,969
2013-KE-35
Costs related to 13-07
2013-KE-36
Costs related to 13-07
(Personnel +
Resource) 4
2014-KE-37
8 agents
4,000
2,200
6,200
2014-KE-38
11 agents
18,000
1,500
19,500
2014-KE-39
30 federal; contract;
state and local
67,000
8,289
75,289
2014-KE-40
Costs related to 14-05
2014-KE-41
Costs related to 14-06
2014-KE-42
Costs related to 14-06
2014-KE-43
Costs related to 14-06
2014-KE-44
Costs related to 14-06
2014-KE-45
16 agents
2014-KE-46
2015-KE-47
20,000
17,000
37,000
Costs related to 14-12
25 detectives
2015-KE-48
Kern Total
Resource Cost ($)
15,500
2,200
17,700
Costs related to 14-18
2014-KE-49
4 agents
22,893
1,316
24,209
2014-KE-50
16 detectives
70,980
3,000
73,980
2014-KE-51
Costs related to 14-14
2014-KE-52
Costs related to 14-14
2014-KE-53
Costs related to 14-14
218,373
35,505
253,878
115
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 6
Costs of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
Kings
EICOS No.
Personnel Cost ($)
(Installation Fees,
Supplies,
Equipment, etc.)
2014-KI-16
3 monitors; 5 agents;
1 technician
50,000
1,000
51,000
2014-KI-17
1 agent; 1 monitor
300
500
800
50,300
1,500
51,800
29,500
4,000
33,500
11,000
2,000
13,000
0
3,858
3,858
18,000
2,000
20,000
Kings Total
Los Angeles
Resource Cost ($)
Nature and Quantity
of
Personnel Used
2014-LA-747
2014-LA-748
2014-LA-749
2014-LA-750
4 monitors; 3
detectives; 2
technicians
1 monitor per day Federal $ only
4 monitors per day for
first 30 days 2 monitors
per day for second 30
days
2 monitors per day state
Total Cost ($)
(Personnel +
Resource) 4
2014-LA-751
2 monitors per day Federal
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-LA-752
2 monitors per day
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-LA-753
4 monitors per day for
first 30 days 2 monitors
per day for second 30
days
0
3,858
3,858
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-LA-754
2014-LA-755
2 monitors per day federal
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-LA-756
2 monitors per day state
18,000
2,000
20,000
3,858
0
3,858
36,000
6,000
42,000
18,000
2,000
20,000
11,000
2,000
13,000
2014-LA-757
2014-LA-758
2014-LA-759
2014-LA-760
4 monitors per day for
first 30 days 2 monitors
per day for second 30
days
4 monitors per day Federal $ only
2 monitors per day state
1 monitor per day Federal $ only
116
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 6
Costs of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Los Angeles
(cont’d)
2014-LA-761
2014-LA-762
2014-LA-763
2014-LA-764
2014-LA-765
Nature and Quantity
of
Personnel Used
1 monitor per day Federal $ only
2 monitors per day Federal
2 monitors per day state
2 monitors per day Federal $ only
2 monitors per day state
Resource Cost ($)
Total Cost ($)
Personnel Cost ($)
(Installation Fees,
Supplies,
Equipment, etc.)
11,000
2,000
13,000
18,000
2,000
20,000
18,000
2,000
20,000
22,000
4,000
26,000
76,680
1,700
78,380
(Personnel +
Resource) 4
2014-LA-766
2 monitors per day Federal
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-LA-768
2 monitors per day Federal $ only
22,000
4,000
26,000
52,945
3,900
56,845
25,560
700
26,260
2014-LA-769
2014-LA-770
2 monitors per day –
Federal
2 monitors per day –
state
2014-LA-771
2 monitors per day Federal
23,000
700
23,700
2014-LA-772
2 monitors per day state
23,000
700
23,700
18,000
2,000
20,000
23,000
700
23,700
2014-LA-773
2014-LA-774
2 monitors per day Federal
2 monitors per day state
2014-LA-775
2 monitors per day
24,460
1,100
25,560
2014-LA-776
2 monitors per day state
0
1,286
1,286
18,000
2,000
20,000
22,000
4,000
26,000
2014-LA-777
2014-LA-778
2 monitors per day Federal
2 monitors per day Federal $ only
2014-LA-779
2 monitors per day state
25,000
700
25,700
2014-LA-780
2 monitors per day Federal
5,136
460
5,596
2014-LA-781
2 monitors per day Federal
23,000
700
23,700
117
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 6
Costs of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Los Angeles
(cont’d)
2014-LA-782
2014-LA-783
Nature and Quantity
of
Personnel Used
2 monitors per day state
2 wiretap monitors per
day
Resource Cost ($)
Total Cost ($)
Personnel Cost ($)
(Installation Fees,
Supplies,
Equipment, etc.)
2,568
430
2,998
25,000
1,700
26,700
(Personnel +
Resource) 4
2013-LA-786
7 per month
105,000
7,500
112,500
2014-LA-787
5
30,000
20,000
50,000
52,945
3,900
56,845
36,000
4,000
40,000
2014-LA-788
2014-LAK-2
2 monitors per day –
Federal
2 monitors per day Federal
2014-LA-789
2 monitors per day Federal
36,000
4,000
40,000
2014-LA-790
7
60,000
5,000
65,000
2014-LA-791
7
35,000
2,500
37,500
2014-LA-792
7
20,000
2,000
22,000
2014-LA-793
2 monitors per day state
25,000
700
25,700
2014-LA-794
2 monitors per day
20,000
2,000
22,000
2014-LA-795
5 monitors
25,000
2,000
27,000
2014-LA-796
7 monitors
35,000
2,500
37,500
2014-LA-797
2 monitors per day state
76,680
1,700
78,380
18,000
2,000
20,000
18,000
2,000
20,000
13-155
2014-LA-800
2 monitors per day Federal
2 monitors per day Federal $ only
2014-LA-801
2 monitors per day state
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-LA-804
2 monitors per day Federal
18,000
1,100
19,100
2014-LA-805
2 monitors per day Federal
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-LA-806
2 monitors - Federa
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-LA-807
2 monitors per day
24,450
1,600
26,050
118
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 6
Costs of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Los Angeles
(cont’d)
2014-LA-808
2014-LA-809
Nature and Quantity
of
Personnel Used
2 monitors per day Federal
2 monitors per day Federal
Resource Cost ($)
Total Cost ($)
Personnel Cost ($)
(Installation Fees,
Supplies,
Equipment, etc.)
18,000
2,000
20,000
78,548
2,100
80,648
(Personnel +
Resource) 4
2014-LA-810
2 monitors per day Federal
52,366
1,400
53,766
2014-LA-811
7 contracted monitors
200,000
15,000
215,000
26,000
2,000
28,000
2014-LA-812
2014-LA-813
2 monitors per day Federal $ only
22,000
4,000
26,000
2014-LA-814
1 installer; 2 monitors
7,458
2,800
10,258
26,000
2,000
28,000
2014-LA-815
2014-LA-816
2 monitors per day state
25,000
700
25,700
2014-LA-817
2 monitors per day Federal $ only
22,000
4,000
26,000
2014-LA-818
2 monitors per day Federal $ only
22,000
4,000
26,000
2014-LA-820
2 monitors per day
26,183
1,600
27,783
2014-LA-821
2014-LA-822
Cost not available
2 wiretap monitors per
day
2014-LA-823
2014-LA-824
2 monitors per day
2014-LA-825
78,156
1,760
79,916
75,000
7,500
82,500
25,560
775
26,335
25,000
2,500
27,500
2014-LA-826
2
26,000
600
26,600
2014-LA-827
7
35,000
2,500
37,500
2014-LA-828
2 monitors per day Federal $ only
22,000
4,000
26,000
2014-LAS-6
6,780
2,800
9,580
2014-LA-829
52,000
4,000
56,000
119
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 6
Costs of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Los Angeles
(cont’d)
Nature and Quantity
of
Personnel Used
Resource Cost ($)
Total Cost ($)
Personnel Cost ($)
(Installation Fees,
Supplies,
Equipment, etc.)
2014-LA-831
26,000
2,000
28,000
2014-LA-832
26,000
600
26,600
(Personnel +
Resource) 4
2014-LA-833
4 monitors; 1
technician
90,901
20,000
110,901
2014-LA-834
install; monitor
22,000
1,013
23,013
2014-LA-835
install; monitor
22,000
400
22,400
2014-LA-836
1 installer; 2 monitors
6,780
2,800
9,580
2014-LA-838
2 monitors; 1 techincian
25,691
700
26,391
2014-LA-839
tanslators
26,000
5,000
31,000
2014-LA-840
2 monitors per day state
76,680
1,700
78,380
2014-LA-841
2 monitors
25,691
775
26,466
2014-LA-842
11
47,522
6,170
53,692
2014-LA-843
8 monitors
17,144
535
17,679
2014-LA-844
7 contracted monitors
50,000
1,500
51,500
2014-LA-845
2 monitors per day Federal $ only
22,000
4,000
26,000
2014-LA-847
25,560
2,000
27,560
2014-LA-848
25,560
2,000
27,560
2014-LA-849
51,120
4,000
55,120
2014-LA-850
25,000
2,500
27,500
2014-LA-851
26,182
5,000
31,182
2014-LA-852
26,182
2,500
28,682
2014-LA-853
25,000
5,000
30,000
2014-LA-854
58,000
2,000
60,000
2014-LA-855
60,000
6,000
66,000
120
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 6
Costs of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Los Angeles
(cont’d)
Nature and Quantity
of
Personnel Used
Resource Cost ($)
Total Cost ($)
Personnel Cost ($)
(Installation Fees,
Supplies,
Equipment, etc.)
2014-LA-856
26,000
2,000
28,000
2014-LA-857
25,000
10,000
35,000
2014-LA-858
75,000
2,500
77,500
2014-LA-859
75,000
5,000
80,000
2014-LA-860
26,000
4,000
30,000
2014-LA-861
50,000
5,000
55,000
2014-LA-862
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-LA-863
25,000
2,500
27,500
2014-LA-864
25,000
5,000
30,000
(Personnel +
Resource) 4
2014-LA-866
install; agent monitors;
contracts
156,000
7,500
163,500
2014-LA-867
3 officers; 2 monitors;
1 technician
25,560
2,000
27,560
26,000
2,000
28,000
2014-LA-868
2014-LA-869
4
48,000
6,000
54,000
2014-LA-870
2 monitors
25,000
2,000
27,000
2014-LAS-7
install; monitors;
contracts
156,000
15,500
171,500
2014-LA-871
2 monitors per day
22,000
4,000
26,000
25,000
1,500
26,500
2014-LAS-8
2014-LA-872
2 monitors per day
28,000
1,013
29,013
2014-LA-873
2 monitors per day for
30 days
26,183
2,000
28,183
2014-LA-874
1 install; 2 monitors
27,000
2,000
29,000
37,800
5,000
42,800
18,900
2,500
21,400
2014-LA-876
2014-LA-877
8 officers; 0 monitors;
1 technician
8 officers, 0 monitors;
1 technician
121
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 6
Costs of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Los Angeles
(cont’d)
2014-LA-878
Nature and Quantity
of
Personnel Used
Resource Cost ($)
(Installation Fees,
Supplies,
Equipment, etc.)
156,000
13,000
169,000
25,560
2,000
27,560
2014-LA-880
26,000
600
26,600
2014-LA-881
6,000
1,700
7,700
2014-LA-879
install; agent monitors;
contracts
3 officers; 2 monitors;
1 techincian
2014-LA-883
2014-LA-884
2 monitors day - state
20,000
4,278,849
401,533
4,680,382
0
3,000
3,000
2014-MAD-7
3 interpreters;
7 agents/monitors
0
3,000
3,000
0
3,000
3,000
0
3,000
3,000
3 interpreters;
7 agents/monitors
3 interpreters;
7 agents/monitors
2014-MAD-10
3 interpreters;
7 agents/monitors
0
3,000
3,000
2014-MAD-12
3 interpreters;
7 agents/monitors
0
3,000
3,000
0
3,000
3,000
0
3,000
3,000
0
24,000
24,000
77,921
0
77,921
77,921
0
77,921
8,200
800
9,000
8,200
800
9,000
36,105
15,652
51,757
2014-MAD-13
2014-MAD-15
3 interpreters;
7 agents/monitors
3 interpreters;
7 agents/monitors
Madera Total
2014-MER-27
16 monitors; 25 agents
Merced Total
2014-NA-1
bilingual investigators;
wire room supervisor
Napa Total
Orange
2,000
3 interpreters;
7 agents/monitors
2014-MAD-9
Napa
18,000
2014-MAD-5
2014-MAD-8
Merced
(Personnel +
Resource) 4
Cost not available
Los Angeles Total
Madera
Total Cost ($)
Personnel Cost ($)
2014-OR-86
17 sworn personnel
acting as monitors and
technicians
122
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 6
Costs of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
Orange
(cont’d)
EICOS No.
Personnel Cost ($)
(Installation Fees,
Supplies,
Equipment, etc.)
2014-OR-87
20 police officers
10,546
6,200
16,746
2014-OR-88
20 police officers
9,228
6,200
15,428
55,879
28,052
83,931
15,000
2,500
17,500
Orange Total
Placer
2014-PLA-3
3 monitors in 10 hour
shifts pool of 20
monitors 1 technician 2
agents
2014-PLA-4
Total Cost ($)
(Personnel +
Resource) 4
Costs related to 2014-PLA-3
Placer Total
Riverside
Resource Cost ($)
Nature and Quantity
of
Personnel Used
15,000
2,500
2013-RIV-899
Cost not available
2013-RIV-902
Cost not available
2013-RIV-904
Cost not available
2013-RIV-905
Cost not available
17,500
2013-RIV-906
1 officer; 2 monitors;
and 1 technician
24,708
643
25,351
2013-RIV-911
6 monitors
54,000
6,000
60,000
2013-RIV-915
Cost not available
2013-RIV-916
2 monitors
40,378
1,200
41,578
2013-RIV-922
1 officer; 2 monitors;
and 1 technician
25,440
642
26,082
2013-RIV-925
2 monitors
18,000
4,000
22,000
2013-RIV-926
Cost not available
2013-RIV-927
Cost not available
2013-RIV-928
1 installer; 3 monitors
2013-RIV-929
26,052
1,600
27,652
Cost not available
2013-RIV-930
1 agent; 2 monitors
62,000
2,500
64,500
2013-RIV-931
1 agent; 2 monitors
62,000
2,500
64,500
123
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 6
Costs of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
Riverside
(cont’d)
Resource Cost ($)
EICOS No.
Nature and Quantity
of
Personnel Used
Personnel Cost ($)
(Installation Fees,
Supplies,
Equipment, etc.)
2013-RIV-932
2 monitors
40,154
1,700
2013-RIV-933
Cost not available
2013-RIV-934
Cost not available
2013-RIV-935
4 monitors
2013-RIV-936
36,000
4,000
Total Cost ($)
(Personnel +
Resource) 4
41,854
40,000
Cost not available
2013-RIV-937
2 monitors
54,000
6,000
60,000
2013-RIV-938
1 officer; 4 monitors;
1 technician
49,416
1,929
51,345
2013-RIV-939
Cost not available
2013-RIV-940
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2013-RIV-941
2 installers and 4
monitors
78,677
2,825
81,502
2013-RIV-942
1 officer; 2 monitors;
and 1 technician
22,152
643
22,795
2013-RIV-943
8 persons used re
installation, monitoring
and transcript
preparation
81,360
4,500
85,860
2013-RIV-944
2 monitors
20,000
2,000
22,000
2013-RIV-945
2 monitors
20,000
2,000
22,000
2013-RIV-946
2 monitors
24,450
1,100
25,550
2013-RIV-947
Cost not available
2013-RIV-948
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2013-RIV-949
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2013-RIV-950
2 monitors
26,000
725
26,725
2013-RIV-951
2 monitors
26,000
700
26,700
2013-RIV-952
2 monitors
54,000
6,000
60,000
2013-RIV-954
Cost not available
124
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 6
Costs of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Riverside
(cont’d)
2013-RIV-955
Nature and Quantity
of
Personnel Used
Resource Cost ($)
Personnel Cost ($)
(Installation Fees,
Supplies,
Equipment, etc.)
Total Cost ($)
(Personnel +
Resource) 4
Cost not available
2013-RIV-956
1 officer; 2 monitors;
and 1 technician
0
643
643
2014-RIV-957
2 monitors
42,863
1,700
44,563
2014-RIV-958
2 monitors
24,400
1,100
25,500
2014-RIV-959
2 monitors
54,000
6,000
60,000
2014-RIV-960
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-961
2 monitors
36,000
4,000
40,000
2014-RIV-962
8 persons used re
installation, monitoring
and transcript
preparation
160,000
18,000
178,000
2014-RIV-963
4 monitors
80,000
8,000
88,000
2014-RIV-964
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-965
4 monitors
44,000
3,600
47,600
2014-RIV-966
1 officer; 2 monitors;
and 1 technician
25,560
1,286
26,846
2014-RIV-967
2 monitors
51,120
2,400
53,520
2014-RIV-968
2 monitors; 1 interpreter
5,964
2,500
8,464
2014-RIV-969
4 monitors
48,900
2,200
51,100
2014-RIV-970
2 monitors
26,000
725
26,725
2014-RIV-971
2 Spanish monitors
22,000
1,400
23,400
2014-RIV-972
Cost not available
2014-RIV-973
Cost not available
2014-RIV-974
Cost not available
2014-RIV-975
2 monitors
118,133
12,500
130,633
2014-RIV-976
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
125
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 6
Costs of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
Riverside
(cont’d)
Resource Cost ($)
EICOS No.
Nature and Quantity
of
Personnel Used
Personnel Cost ($)
(Installation Fees,
Supplies,
Equipment, etc.)
2014-RIV-977
2 monitors
25,560
1,200
26,760
2014-RIV-980
2 monitors
24,500
1,100
25,600
2014-RIV-981
2 monitors
17,040
1,500
18,540
2014-RIV-982
2 monitors
20,000
2,000
22,000
2014-RIV-983
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-984
2 monitors
24,211
2,600
26,811
2014-RIV-985
2 monitors and
1 technician
26,052
1,600
27,652
2014-RIV-986
Cost not available
2014-RIV-987
Cost not available
2014-RIV-988
Cost not available
Total Cost ($)
(Personnel +
Resource) 4
2014-RIV-989
2 monitors
25,000
1,000
26,000
2014-RIV-990
2 monitors
54,000
6,000
60,000
2014-RIV-991
10 persons used re
installation, monitoring
and transcript
preparation
103,360
6,000
109,360
2014-RIV-992
4 monitors per day
49,100
2,200
51,300
2014-RIV-993
1 officer; 2 civilian
monitors; and
1 technician
25,560
1,284
26,844
2014-RIV-994
2 monitors
25,560
7,500
33,060
2014-RIV-995
2 monitors
20,947
800
21,747
2014-RIV-996
1 officer; 2 monitors;
and 1 technician
17,040
643
17,683
2013-RIV-997
2 monitors
26,153
1,200
27,353
2014-RIV-998
2 Spanish monitors
44,000
2,800
46,800
2014-RIV-999
1 officer; 2 civilian
monitors; and
1 technician
230,040
13,750
243,790
126
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 6
Costs of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Riverside
(cont’d)
2014-RIV-1000
2014-RIV-1001
Nature and Quantity
of
Personnel Used
Resource Cost ($)
Personnel Cost ($)
(Installation Fees,
Supplies,
Equipment, etc.)
Total Cost ($)
(Personnel +
Resource) 4
Cost not available
2 monitors
25,560
1,500
2014-RIV-1002
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1003
Cost not available
27,060
2014-RIV-1004
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1005
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1006
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1007
2 monitors
5,112
1,200
6,312
2014-RIV-1008
1 agent; 2 monitors
15,000
1,500
16,500
26,183
2,000
28,183
28,627
2,870
31,497
2014-RIV-1009
2014-RIV-1010
1 officer; 4 monitors
and 1 technician
8 persons used re
installation and
monitoring
2014-RIV-1011
3 monitors
60,000
6,000
66,000
2014-RIV-1012
4 monitors
40,000
4,000
44,000
2014-RIV-1013
2014-RIV-1014
Cost not available
1 officer; 2 monitors;
and 1 technician
2014-RIV-1016
5,112
643
5,755
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1017
2 monitors
3,333
1,000
4,333
2014-RIV-1018
2 monitors
36,000
4,000
40,000
2014-RIV-1019
2 monitors
20,000
2,000
22,000
2014-RIV-1020
2 monitors
22,000
1,800
23,800
2014-RIV-1021
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1022
2 Spanish monitors
44,000
2,800
46,800
2014-RIV-1023
4 monitors
51,120
1,580
52,700
127
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 6
Costs of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
Riverside
(cont’d)
Resource Cost ($)
EICOS No.
Nature and Quantity
of
Personnel Used
Personnel Cost ($)
(Installation Fees,
Supplies,
Equipment, etc.)
2014-RIV-1024
2 monitors
26,183
1,700
27,883
2014-RIV-1025
2 monitors
0
1,500
1,500
2014-RIV-1026
Total Cost ($)
(Personnel +
Resource) 4
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1027
4 monitors
36,240
1,200
37,440
2014-RIV-1028
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1029
2 monitors
25,560
1,500
27,060
2014-RIV-1030
4 monitors
41,004
1,290
42,294
2014-RIV-1031
2 monitors
36,000
4,000
40,000
2014-RIV-1032
4 monitors
69,228
0
69,228
120,000
12,000
132,000
25,560
1,286
26,846
2014-RIV-1033
2014-RIV-1034
6 persons used re
installation, monitoring
and transcript
preparation
1 officer; 2 civilian
monitors; and 1
technician
2014-RIV-1035
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1036
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1037
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1039
6 persons used re
installation, monitoring
and transcript
preparation
12,000
12,000
24,000
2014-RIV-1040
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1041
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1042
1 officer; 2 civilian
monitors; and 1
technician
0
643
643
2014-RIV-1043
2 monitors
10,400
1,000
11,400
2014-RIV-1044
Cost not available
128
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 6
Costs of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
Riverside
(cont’d)
Resource Cost ($)
EICOS No.
Nature and Quantity
of
Personnel Used
Personnel Cost ($)
(Installation Fees,
Supplies,
Equipment, etc.)
2014-RIV-1045
2 monitors
18,000
4,000
22,000
2013-RIV-1046
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1047
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1048
2 monitors
15,560
790
16,350
153,360
3,000
156,360
26,051
3,200
29,251
2014-RIV-1049
2014-RIV-1050
2 metropolitan
translators
3 monitors and
1 technician
Total Cost ($)
(Personnel +
Resource) 4
2014-RIV-1051
2 Spanish monitors
26,051
2,800
28,851
2014-RIV-1052
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1053
2 monitors
96,000
5,400
101,400
2014-RIV-1054
2 monitors
35,000
3,000
38,000
2014-RIV-1055
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1056
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1057
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1058
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1059
8 officers; 0 monitors;
and 1 technician
18,900
2,500
21,400
2014-RIV-1060
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1061
2 monitors
24,450
1,100
25,550
2014-RIV-1062
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1063
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1064
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1065
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1066
2014-RIV-1067
Cost not available
2 monitors
36,000
4,000
40,000
129
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 6
Costs of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
Riverside
(cont’d)
Resource Cost ($)
EICOS No.
Nature and Quantity
of
Personnel Used
Personnel Cost ($)
(Installation Fees,
Supplies,
Equipment, etc.)
2014-RIV-1068
1 officer; 2 civilian
monitors; and
1 technician
51,120
1,929
2014-RIV-1070
Total Cost ($)
(Personnel +
Resource) 4
53,049
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1071
2 Spanish monitors
44,000
2,800
46,800
2014-RIV-1072
2 monitors
4,620
2,300
6,920
2014-RIV-1073
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1074
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1075
2 monitors and 1 agent
2014-RIV-1076
2014-RIV-1078
8,348
2,600
10,948
Cost not available
2 monitors
2014-RIV-1079
36,000
4,000
40,000
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1080
2 monitors
36,000
4,000
40,000
2013-RIV-1081
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1082
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1083
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1084
2 monitors
102,240
5,000
107,240
2014-RIV-1085
2 monitors
54,000
6,000
60,000
2014-RIV-1086
1 officer; 6 monitors;
and 1 technician
85,200
2,582
87,782
2014-RIV-1087
2 monitors
2,300
0
2,300
2014-RIV-1088
2 monitors
36,000
4,000
40,000
2014-RIV-1089
1 officer; 4 civilian
monitors; 1 technician
51,120
1,284
52,404
2014-RIV-1090
2 monitors
44,000
3,600
47,600
2014-RIV-1091
2 translators
51,120
4,200
55,320
2014-RIV-1092
2 monitors
65,827
2,400
68,227
130
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 6
Costs of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
Riverside
(cont’d)
Resource Cost ($)
EICOS No.
Nature and Quantity
of
Personnel Used
Personnel Cost ($)
(Installation Fees,
Supplies,
Equipment, etc.)
2014-RIV-1093
2 monitors
25,560
1,500
27,060
2014-RIV-1094
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1095
6 monitors
54,000
6,000
60,000
2014-RIV-1096
2 monitors
96,000
14,400
110,400
2014-RIV-1097
2 Spanish monitors
26,051
2,800
28,851
2014-RIV-1098
2 monitors
26,000
2,500
28,500
2014-RIV-1099
Total Cost ($)
(Personnel +
Resource) 4
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1100
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1101
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1102
1 officer; 4 civilian
monitors; 1 technician
51,120
1,286
52,406
2014-RIV-1103
3 DEA special agents;
7 TFOs; and 2 monitors
125,400
2,000
127,400
2014-RIV-1104
2 monitors
14,707
25,560
40,267
2014-RIV-1106
2 monitors
36,000
4,000
40,000
2014-RIV-1108
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1109
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1110
7 civilian monitors
133,966
9,350
143,316
2014-RIV-1111
12 persons used re
installation, monitoring
and transcript
preparation
42,000
1,000
43,000
2014-RIV-1112
2 monitors per day
22,000
4,000
26,000
2014-RIV-1113
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1114
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1115
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1116
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
131
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 6
Costs of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
Riverside
(cont’d)
Resource Cost ($)
EICOS No.
Nature and Quantity
of
Personnel Used
Personnel Cost ($)
(Installation Fees,
Supplies,
Equipment, etc.)
2014-RIV-1117
2 monitors
54,000
6,000
60,000
2014-RIV-1118
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1119
2014-RIV-1120
Total Cost ($)
(Personnel +
Resource) 4
Cost not available
2 monitors
2014-RIV-1121
1,870
2,500
4,370
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1122
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1123
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1124
2 monitors
12,080
700
12,780
2014-RIV-1125
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1127
8 monitors
144,000
16,000
160,000
2014-RIV-1128
2 monitors
14,707
25,560
40,267
2014-RIV-1129
2 monitors per day
24,000
500
24,500
2014-RIV-1130
1 officer; 2 civilian
monitors; and
1 technician
52,364
1,286
53,650
2014-RIV-1131
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2013-RIV-1132
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1133
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1134
2 monitors
14,707
51,120
65,827
2013-RIV-1135
6 monitors
76,680
4,800
81,480
2014-RIV-1136
5 monitors
45,000
70,000
115,000
2014-RIV-1137
2014-RIV-1138
Cost not available
2 monitors
2014-RIV-1139
2014-RIV-1141
52,000
1,450
53,450
Cost not available
4 monitors
36,240
1,200
37,440
132
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 6
Costs of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
Riverside
(cont’d)
Resource Cost ($)
EICOS No.
Nature and Quantity
of
Personnel Used
Personnel Cost ($)
(Installation Fees,
Supplies,
Equipment, etc.)
2014-RIV-1142
2 monitors
26,000
1,700
2014-RIV-1143
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1144
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1145
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
2014-RIV-1146
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1148
Cost not available
Total Cost ($)
(Personnel +
Resource) 4
27,700
20,000
2014-RIV-1149
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1150
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1151
2 monitors
11,928
1,000
12,928
2014-RIV-1152
4 monitors
4,027
2,600
6,627
2014-RIV-1153
2 monitors
22,000
1,400
23,400
2014-RIV-1154
1 officer; 2 civilian
monitors; and
1 technician
68,280
1,929
70,209
2014-RIV-1155
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1156
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1157
2 monitors per day
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1158
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1160
4 monitors
36,000
4,000
40,000
2014-RIV-1161
3 monitors
852
580
1,432
2014-RIV-1162
1 officer; 6 civilian
monitors; and
1 technician
43,600
2,029
45,629
2014-RIV-1163
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1164
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1165
2 monitors
14,707
51,120
65,827
133
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 6
Costs of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Riverside
(cont’d)
2014-RIV-1166
2014-RIV-1167
Nature and Quantity
of
Personnel Used
1 officer; 2 civilian
monitors;
1 technician
1 officer; 2 civilian
monitors; and
1 technician
2014-RIV-1168
2014-RIV-1169
Resource Cost ($)
Total Cost ($)
Personnel Cost ($)
(Installation Fees,
Supplies,
Equipment, etc.)
8,520
643
9,163
52,364
1,286
53,650
(Personnel +
Resource) 4
Cost not available
2 translators/monitors
2014-RIV-1170
25,560
3,900
29,460
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1171
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1172
4 monitors
36,000
4,000
40,000
2014-RIV-1173
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1174
4 monitors
36,000
4,000
40,000
2014-RIV-1175
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1176
2 monitors
96,000
1,000
97,000
2013-RIV-1177
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1178
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1179
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1180
2014-RIV-1181
Cost not available
2 monitors
2014-RIV-1182
2014-RIV-1183
28,624
2,600
31,224
Cost not available
1 officer; 2 civilian
monitors;
1 technician
2014-RIV-1184
25,560
643
26,203
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1185
2 monitors
26,000
4,000
30,000
2014-RIV-1186
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
134
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 6
Costs of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
Riverside
(cont’d)
Resource Cost ($)
EICOS No.
Nature and Quantity
of
Personnel Used
Personnel Cost ($)
(Installation Fees,
Supplies,
Equipment, etc.)
2014-RIV-1187
12 persons used to
coordinate monitoring,
installation and
transcript preparation
42,000
1,000
43,000
2014-RIV-1188
2 monitors
115,020
12,400
127,420
2014-RIV-1190
6 monitors
124,761
10,650
135,411
2014-RIV-1191
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1192
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1193
2 monitors
25,691
775
26,466
2014-RIV-1194
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1195
1 officer; 2 civilian
monitors; and
1 technician
5,964
643
6,607
2014-RIV-1196
1 officer; 2 monitors;
and 1 technician
35,784
1,286
37,070
2014-RIV-1197
2 monitors
44,000
3,600
47,600
2014-RIV-1198
2 monitors
52,000
5,000
57,000
2014-RIV-1199
1 monitor per day
14,000
2,500
16,500
2014-RIV-1200
2014-RIV-1201
2014-RIV-1202
2014-RIV-1203
Total Cost ($)
(Personnel +
Resource) 4
Cost not available
6 persons used re
installation, monitoring
and transcript
preparation
1 officer; 2 monitors;
and 1 technician
1 officer; 2 monitors;
and 1 technician
2014-RIV-1204
67,500
70,000
137,500
34,080
1,286
35,366
0
643
643
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1205
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1206
30 persons used re
installation, monitoring
and transcript
preparation
18,000
2,000
20,000
135
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 6
Costs of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
Riverside
(cont’d)
Resource Cost ($)
EICOS No.
Nature and Quantity
of
Personnel Used
Personnel Cost ($)
(Installation Fees,
Supplies,
Equipment, etc.)
2014-RIV-1207
2 monitors
22,000
1,400
23,400
2014-RIV-1208
1 officer; 4 civilian
monitors; and
1 technician
51,120
1,286
52,406
2014-RIV-1209
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1210
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1211
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1212
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1213
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1214
10 officers
94,500
12,500
107,000
2014-RIV-1215
6 monitors
52,100
2,400
54,500
2014-RIV-1216
3 monitors
30,312
2,000
32,312
2014-RIV-1217
1 officer, 2 monitors and
1 tech
25,560
1,286
26,846
2014-RIV-1218
2 monitors
48,000
2,800
50,800
2014-RIV-1219
Total Cost ($)
(Personnel +
Resource) 4
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1220
16 persons used re
installation, monitoring
and transcript
preparation
144,000
16,000
160,000
2014-RIV-1221
2 monitors
26,000
2,500
28,500
2014-RIV-1222
2 monitors
24,450
2,000
26,450
2014-RIV-1223
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1224
2 monitors
96,000
16,000
112,000
2014-RIV-1225
2 monitors
10,052
2,600
12,652
2014-RIV-1226
2 monitors
44,000
3,600
47,600
2014-RIV-1227
2014-RIV-1229
Cost not available
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
136
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 6
Costs of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
Riverside
(cont’d)
Resource Cost ($)
EICOS No.
Nature and Quantity
of
Personnel Used
Personnel Cost ($)
(Installation Fees,
Supplies,
Equipment, etc.)
2014-RIV-1231
4 monitors
67,500
37,500
105,000
2014-RIV-1232
1 officer; 2 civilian
monitors; and
1 technician
7,668
643
8,311
2014-RIV-1233
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1234
Total Cost ($)
(Personnel +
Resource) 4
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1235
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1236
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1237
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1238
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1239
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1240
12 persons used re
installation, monitoring
and transcript
preparation
315,763
1,600
317,363
2014-RIV-1241
2 monitors
24,000
5,500
29,500
2014-RIV-1242
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1243
4 monitors
36,000
4,000
40,000
2014-RIV-1244
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1245
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1246
2014-RIV-1247
Cost not available
2 monitors
2014-RIV-1248
18,000
2,000
20,000
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1249
6 monitors
54,000
6,000
60,000
2014-RIV-1250
2 monitors
37,800
5,000
42,800
2014-RIV-1251
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1252
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
137
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 6
Costs of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
Riverside
(cont’d)
Resource Cost ($)
EICOS No.
Nature and Quantity
of
Personnel Used
Personnel Cost ($)
(Installation Fees,
Supplies,
Equipment, etc.)
2014-RIV-1253
2 investigators and 2
monitors
7,000
2,000
9,000
2014-RIV-1254
8 civilian monitors
124,761
9,375
134,136
2014-RIV-1255
1 officer; 2 monitors;
1 technician
25,560
643
26,203
2014-RIV-1256
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1257
2 monitors
22,249
2,000
24,249
2014-RIV-1258
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1259
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1260
Cost not available
Total Cost ($)
(Personnel +
Resource) 4
2014-RIV-1261
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1262
1 officer; 2 monitors;
and 1 technician
0
643
643
2014-RIV-1263
2 monitors
115,020
15,000
130,020
2014-RIV-1264
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1265
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1266
2 monitors
2014-RIV-1267
18,000
2,000
20,000
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1268
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1269
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1270
2 monitors
21,300
1,500
22,800
2014-RIV-1271
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1272
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1273
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1275
6 monitors
52,100
2,400
54,500
2014-RIV-1276
1 officer; 4 monitors;
1 technician
41,648
1,286
42,934
2014-RIV-1277
5 monitors
90,000
40,000
130,000
138
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 6
Costs of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
Riverside
(cont’d)
Resource Cost ($)
EICOS No.
Nature and Quantity
of
Personnel Used
Personnel Cost ($)
(Installation Fees,
Supplies,
Equipment, etc.)
2014-RIV-1278
1 install; 2 monitors
60,000
5,000
2014-RIV-1280
Total Cost ($)
(Personnel +
Resource) 4
65,000
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1281
2 monitors
14,707
51,120
65,827
2014-RIV-1282
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1283
2 monitors
24,550
1,100
25,650
2014-RIV-1284
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1285
2 monitors
96,000
1,800
97,800
2014-RIV-1286
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1287
4 monitors
51,380
700
52,080
2014-RIV-1288
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1289
12 persons used re
installation, monitoring
and transcript
preparation
108,000
12,000
120,000
2014-RIV-1290
6 monitors
54,000
6,000
60,000
2014-RIV-1291
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1292
2014-RIV-1293
Cost not available
2 monitors
2014-RIV-1294
24,450
1,100
25,550
Cost not available
2013-RIV-1295
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1296
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1297
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1298
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1299
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1300
10 officers
37,800
5,000
42,800
2014-RIV-1301
Cost not available
139
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 6
Costs of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
Riverside
(cont’d)
Resource Cost ($)
EICOS No.
Nature and Quantity
of
Personnel Used
Personnel Cost ($)
(Installation Fees,
Supplies,
Equipment, etc.)
2014-RIV-1302
1 officer; 3 civilian
monitors; and 1
technician
59,580
3,815
63,395
2014-RIV-1303
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1304
Total Cost ($)
(Personnel +
Resource) 4
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1305
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1306
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1307
1 monitor
10,000
2,000
12,000
2014-RIV-1308
2014-RIV-1309
Cost not available
2 monitors/interpreters
115,020
15,000
2014-RIV-1310
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1311
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1312
Cost not available
130,020
2014-RIV-1313
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1315
2 monitors
26,182
700
26,882
2014-RIV-1316
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1317
7 persons used re
installation, monitoring
and transcript
preparation
133,480
9,375
142,855
2014-RIV-1319
2 monitors
17,300
2,400
19,700
2014-RIV-1320
4 monitors
51,120
2,400
53,520
2014-RIV-1321
1 officer and
1 technician
0
643
643
2014-RIV-1322
2 monitors
51,000
2,200
53,200
2014-RIV-1323
2014-RIV-1324
2014-RIV-1326
Cost not available
4 monitors per day
51,120
5,000
56,120
Cost not available
140
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 6
Costs of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
Riverside
(cont’d)
Resource Cost ($)
EICOS No.
Nature and Quantity
of
Personnel Used
Personnel Cost ($)
(Installation Fees,
Supplies,
Equipment, etc.)
2014-RIV-1327
0
0
2,500
2014-RIV-1328
Total Cost ($)
(Personnel +
Resource) 4
2,500
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1329
2 monitors
24,000
9,600
33,600
2014-RIV-1330
1 officer; 2 civilian
monitors; 1 techinican
25,560
643
26,203
2014-RIV-1331
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1332
2 monitors
44,000
3,600
47,600
2014-RIV-1333
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1334
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1335
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1336
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1337
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1338
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1339
10 officers
37,800
5,000
42,800
2014-RIV-1340
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1341
2 monitors
22,000
1,400
23,400
2014-RIV-1342
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1343
4 monitors
51,120
2,400
53,520
2014-RIV-1344
1 officer; 4 monitors;and
1 technician
76,680
3,858
80,538
2014-RIV-1345
2 monitors
22,698
5,000
27,698
2014-RIV-1346
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1347
2014-RIV-1348
2014-RIV-1349
Cost not available
7 persons used re
installation and
monitoring
25,936
2,460
28,396
Cost not available
141
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 6
Costs of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Riverside
(cont’d)
2014-RIV-1350
Nature and Quantity
of
Personnel Used
Resource Cost ($)
Personnel Cost ($)
(Installation Fees,
Supplies,
Equipment, etc.)
Total Cost ($)
(Personnel +
Resource) 4
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1351
4 monitors
36,000
4,000
40,000
2014-RIV-1352
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1353
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1354
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1355
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1356
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1357
2 monitors
8,520
1,200
9,720
2014-RIV-1358
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1359
1 monitor
0
2,500
2,500
2014-RIV-1360
2 monitors
30,482
1,700
32,182
2014-RIV-1361
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1362
1 officer; 2 civilian
monitors; 1 technician
17,040
1,286
18,326
2014-RIV-1363
1 officer; 2 civilian
monitors; and
1 technician
25,560
1,286
26,846
2014-RIV-1364
7 persons used re
installation, monitoring
and transcript
preparation.
157,500
10,000
167,500
2014-RIV-1365
2 monitors
2,500
32,000
34,500
2014-RIV-1366
1 officer; 4 monitors;
and 1 technician
25,560
2,000
27,560
2014-RIV-1367
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1368
Costs related to R1-13-0168
2014-RIV-1369
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1370
2 monitors
25,560
1,600
27,160
2014-RIV-1371
4 monitors per day
52,364
2,300
54,664
142
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 6
Costs of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
Riverside
(cont’d)
Resource Cost ($)
EICOS No.
Nature and Quantity
of
Personnel Used
Personnel Cost ($)
(Installation Fees,
Supplies,
Equipment, etc.)
2014-RIV-1372
4 monitors
36,000
4,000
40,000
2014-RIV-1373
2 monitors
48,000
3,200
51,200
2014-RIV-1374
2 monitors/translators
102,240
15,000
117,240
2014-RIV-1375
2 Spanish monitors
44,000
2,800
46,800
2014-RIV-1376
6 civilian monitors
87,416
10,200
97,616
2014-RIV-1377
2 monitors
49,100
3,200
52,300
2014-RIV-1378
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1379
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1380
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1381
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1382
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1383
2 monitors
13,891
775
14,666
2014-RIV-1384
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1385
Cost not available
Total Cost ($)
(Personnel +
Resource) 4
2014-RIV-1386
2 monitors per day
25,560
1,600
27,160
2014-RIV-1387
2 monitors
44,000
3,600
47,600
2014-RIV-1388
2 monitors
65,000
2,500
67,500
2014-RIV-1389
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1390
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1392
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1393
4 monitors
3,600
4,000
7,600
2014-RIV-1394
2014-RIV-1395
2014-RIV-1396
Cost not available
2 Spanish monitors
22,000
1,400
23,400
Cost not available
143
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 6
Costs of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
Riverside
(cont’d)
Resource Cost ($)
EICOS No.
Nature and Quantity
of
Personnel Used
Personnel Cost ($)
(Installation Fees,
Supplies,
Equipment, etc.)
2014-RIV-1398
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1399
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1400
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1401
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1402
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1403
4 monitors
2014-RIV-1404
39,028
2,400
Total Cost ($)
(Personnel +
Resource) 4
41,428
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1405
1 officer; 4 civilian
monitors;and
1 technician
50,880
1,286
52,166
2014-RIV-1406
2 monitors
60,378
6,800
67,178
2014-RIV-1407
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1408
1 monitor and
1 supervisor
18,144
2,500
20,644
2014-RIV-1409
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1410
4 monitors
36,000
4,000
40,000
2014-RIV-1411
1 monitor per day
2,000
14,000
16,000
2014-RIV-1412
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1413
6 monitors
60,000
4,500
64,500
2014-RIV-1414
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1415
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1416
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1417
2 monitors
25,691
876
26,567
2014-RIV-1418
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1419
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1420
Cost not available
144
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 6
Costs of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
Riverside
(cont’d)
Resource Cost ($)
EICOS No.
Nature and Quantity
of
Personnel Used
Personnel Cost ($)
(Installation Fees,
Supplies,
Equipment, etc.)
2014-RIV-1421
2 monitors
28,724
5,950
2014-RIV-1423
Total Cost ($)
(Personnel +
Resource) 4
34,674
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1424
2 contract linguists
41,894
1,120
43,014
2014-RIV-1425
2 monitors and
installers
25,000
2,000
27,000
2014-RIV-1426
2 monitors/interpreters
76,680
15,000
91,680
2014-RIV-1427
2 Spanish monitors
66,000
5,400
71,400
2014-RIV-1428
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1429
2 monitors
36,000
4,000
40,000
2014-RIV-1430
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1431
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1432
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1433
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1434
2 monitors
13,608
2,500
16,108
2014-RIV-1435
6 monitors
4,942
300
5,242
2014-RIV-1436
6 monitors
117,500
5,000
122,500
2014-RIV-1437
2 monitors
24,550
625
25,175
2014-RIV-1438
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1439
4 monitors
36,000
4,000
40,000
2014-RIV-1440
1 monitor; 1 supervisor
27,216
2,026
29,242
2014-RIV-1441
2 monitors
16,200
2,500
18,700
2014-RIV-1442
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1443
1 monitor
0
2,500
2,500
2014-RIV-1444
1 officer; 2 monitors;
and 1 technician
1,704
643
2,347
145
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 6
Costs of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
Riverside
(cont’d)
Resource Cost ($)
EICOS No.
Nature and Quantity
of
Personnel Used
Personnel Cost ($)
(Installation Fees,
Supplies,
Equipment, etc.)
2014-RIV-1445
1 officer; 2 monitors;
1 technician
8,520
643
9,163
2014-RIV-1446
2 monitors
36,000
4,000
40,000
2014-RIV-1447
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1449
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1451
Total Cost ($)
(Personnel +
Resource) 4
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1452
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1453
2 monitors
11,901
1,750
13,651
2014-RIV-1455
6 monitors
100,000
7,050
107,050
2014-RIV-1456
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1457
3 monitors
11,076
930
12,006
2014-RIV-1458
4 monitors
36,000
4,000
40,000
2014-RIV-1459
4 monitors
36,000
4,000
40,000
2014-RIV-1460
4 monitors
36,000
4,000
40,000
2014-RIV-1461
2 monitors
1,200
25,560
26,760
2014-RIV-1463
2 monitors
26,182
1,700
27,882
2014-RIV-1464
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1466
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1467
2 monitors
25,691
775
26,466
2014-RIV-1468
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1470
2 monitors
26,183
700
26,883
2014-RIV-1471
2 monitors
24,000
1,600
25,600
2014-RIV-1472
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1473
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1474
2 Spanish monitors
66,000
5,400
71,400
146
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 6
Costs of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
Riverside
(cont’d)
Resource Cost ($)
EICOS No.
Nature and Quantity
of
Personnel Used
Personnel Cost ($)
(Installation Fees,
Supplies,
Equipment, etc.)
2014-RIV-1475
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1476
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1477
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1478
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1479
Cost not available
Total Cost ($)
(Personnel +
Resource) 4
2014-RIV-1480
2 monitors
14,484
1,800
16,284
2014-RIV-1481
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1482
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1483
4 monitors
36,000
4,000
40,000
2013-RIV-1484
1 officer; 4 monitors;
and 1 technician
51,120
1,929
53,049
2014-RIV-1485
2 monitors
25,691
1,775
27,466
2014-RIV-1486
2 monitors
104,252
22,500
126,752
2014-RIV-1487
6 monitors
76,680
7,800
84,480
2014-RIV-1488
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1489
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1490
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1491
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1492
4 monitors
74,124
6,750
80,874
2014-RIV-1493
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1494
4 monitors
36,000
4,000
40,000
2014-RIV-1495
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1496
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1497
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1498
5 monitors
26,412
1,810
28,222
147
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 6
Costs of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
Riverside
(cont’d)
Resource Cost ($)
EICOS No.
Nature and Quantity
of
Personnel Used
Personnel Cost ($)
(Installation Fees,
Supplies,
Equipment, etc.)
2014-RIV-1499
1 officer; 2 monitors;
1 technician
25,560
643
26,203
3,100
36,229
2014-RIV-1500
2014-RIV-1501
Total Cost ($)
(Personnel +
Resource) 4
Cost not available
2 monitors
2014-RIV-1502
33,129
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1503
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1504
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1505
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1506
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1507
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1508
4 monitors
86,560
4,325
90,885
2014-RIV-1510
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1511
2 monitors
26,183
700
26,883
2014-RIV-1512
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1513
2 monitors; 1 installer
60,000
6,000
66,000
2014-RIV-1514
2 monitors
36,000
4,000
40,000
2014-RIV-1515
6 monitors
76,680
3,600
80,280
2014-RIV-1516
2 monitors
26,182
2,600
28,782
2014-RIV-1517
1 officer; 2 monitors;
1 technician
25,560
643
26,203
2014-RIV-1518
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1519
4 monitors
49,100
3,300
52,400
2014-RIV-1520
8 monitors
72,000
8,000
80,000
2014-RIV-1521
2 monitors
6,983
2,500
9,483
2014-RIV-1522
5 monitors
35,784
2,020
37,804
2014-RIV-1523
2 monitors
26,782
1,600
28,382
148
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 6
Costs of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Riverside
(cont’d)
2014-RIV-1524
Nature and Quantity
of
Personnel Used
Resource Cost ($)
Personnel Cost ($)
(Installation Fees,
Supplies,
Equipment, etc.)
Total Cost ($)
(Personnel +
Resource) 4
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1525
2 monitors
44,000
3,600
47,600
2014-RIV-1526
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1527
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1528
3 monitors
25,560
1,600
27,160
2014-RIV-1529
2 monitors
25,891
876
26,767
5,400
71,400
2014-RIV-1530
2014-RIV-1533
Cost not available
2 monitors
2014-RIV-1534
66,000
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1535
2 monitors
24,550
1,100
25,650
2014-RIV-1538
2 monitors
24,000
3,200
27,200
2014-RIV-1539
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1540
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1541
1 officer; 2 monitors;
and 1 technician
42,600
1,286
43,886
2014-RIV-1542
2 monitors
11,000
2,300
13,300
2014-RIV-1544
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1545
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1546
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1547
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1549
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1550
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1551
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1552
2014-RIV-1553
Cost not available
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
149
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 6
Costs of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Riverside
(cont’d)
2014-RIV-1554
Nature and Quantity
of
Personnel Used
Personnel Cost ($)
(Installation Fees,
Supplies,
Equipment, etc.)
Total Cost ($)
(Personnel +
Resource) 4
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1555
5 monitors
60,131
5,800
65,931
2014-RIV-1557
1 monitor
26,051
825
26,876
2014-RIV-1558
4 monitors
123,540
6,700
130,240
2014-RIV-1559
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1561
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1563
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1565
1 DEA agent; 2 wire
monitors
28,624
2,600
31,224
2014-RIV-1568
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1569
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1570
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1571
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1572
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-RIV-1573
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1574
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1575
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1576
2 monitors
2014-RIV-1577
2014-RIV-1581
2014-RIV-1586
2 monitors
22,500
127,252
18,000
2,000
20,000
Cost not available
2 monitors
2014-RIV-1587
2014-RIV-1589
104,752
Cost not available
2014-RIV-1582
Riverside Total
Resource Cost ($)
18,000
2,000
20,000
Cost not available
2 monitors
26,690
700
27,390
16,295,999
1,876,999
18,172,998
150
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 6
Costs of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
Sacramento
EICOS No.
Personnel Cost ($)
(Installation Fees,
Supplies,
Equipment, etc.)
2014-SAC-54
35 detectives, patrol,
civilian staff
52,402
6,431
58,833
2014-SAC-56
5 detectives, monitors
22,650
572
23,222
2014-SAC-57
25 detectives and
translators
127,000
21,000
148,000
2014-SAC-59
2014-SAC-60
Total Cost ($)
(Personnel +
Resource) 4
Costs related to WT-14-04
25 detectives
2014-SAC-61
95,000
15,000
110,000
Costs related to WT-14-04
Sacramento Total
San Bernardino
Resource Cost ($)
Nature and Quantity
of
Personnel Used
297,052
43,003
340,055
2014-SBD-538
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-SBD-539
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-SBD-540
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-SBD-542
1 officer; 1 monitor
70,000
2,000
72,000
2014-SBD-543
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-SBD-544
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-SBD-545
4 monitors
66,700
5,400
72,100
2014-SBD-546
1 officer; 1 monitor
140,000
4,000
144,000
2014-SBD-547
2 officers; 2 monitors
67,007
2,100
69,107
2014-SBD-548
2 officers; 4 monitors
84,000
2,000
86,000
2014-SBD-549
2 officers; 2 monitors
56,000
2,000
58,000
2014-SBD-550
1 officer; 2 monitors;
1 technician
17,040
7,643
24,683
2014-SBD-551
13 officers
43,920
5,000
48,920
2014-SBD-552
1 officer; 2 monitors
70,000
4,000
74,000
2014-SBD-553
1 officer; 4 monitors
300,000
12,000
312,000
2014-SBD-554
1 officer; 3 monitors
95,000
6,000
101,000
2014-SBD-555
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
151
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 6
Costs of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
San Bernardino
(cont’d)
EICOS No.
Personnel Cost ($)
(Installation Fees,
Supplies,
Equipment, etc.)
2014-SBD-557
1 officer; 2 monitors
70,000
6,000
76,000
2014-SBD-558
1 officer, 2 monitors
70,000
4,000
74,000
2014-SBD-559
1 officer; 1 monitor
50,000
2,000
52,000
2014-SBD-560
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-SBD-561
6 officers; 2 technicians
38,640
1,000
39,640
60,312
2,000
62,312
2014-SBD-562
Total Cost ($)
(Personnel +
Resource) 4
2014-SBD-563
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-SBD-564
6 officers
38,640
1,000
39,640
2014-SBD-566
16 officers
50,000
10,000
60,000
2014-SBD-567
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-SBD-569
16 officers
50,000
30,000
80,000
2014-SBD-570
2 monitors
18,000
2,000
20,000
2014-SBD-571
16 officers
50,000
40,000
90,000
1,667,259
168,143
1,835,402
25,500
250
25,750
65,867
13,550
79,417
San Bernardino Total
San Diego
Resource Cost ($)
Nature and Quantity
of
Personnel Used
2014-SD-180
2014-SD-181
translation, monitoring
service
1-4 monitors/8 hr shift x
2 shifts/day
2014-SD-182
Costs related to 14-12 (Eicos 2014-SD-190)
2014-SD-183
Costs related to 14-07 (Eicos 2014-SD-185)
2014-SD-185
2 monitors per day
27,000
600
27,600
2014-SD-186
8 linguists
54,646
3,391
58,037
2014-SD-187
2014-SD-188
2014-SD-189
Costs related to 14-13 (Eicos 2014-SD-188)
8 linguists
54,646
3,391
58,037
Costs related to 14-12 (Eicos 2014-SD-182)
152
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 6
Costs of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
San Diego
(cont’d)
EICOS No.
Personnel Cost ($)
(Installation Fees,
Supplies,
Equipment, etc.)
2014-SD-190
average of 4 monitors at
two 8 hour shifts/day
81,647
4,768
86,415
2014-SD-191
20 police officers
70,956
1,474
72,430
2014-SD-192
5 monitors; 7 linguists
197,476
4,270
201,746
2014-SD-193
Costs related to 14-04 (Eicos 2014-SD-192)
2014-SD-195
Costs related to 14-11 (Eicos 2014-SD-191)
San Diego Total
San Joaquin
577,738
31,694
2015-SJ-36
Cost not available
2015-SJ-37
Cost not available
2015-SJ-38
Cost not available
2015-SJ-39
Cost not available
2015-SJ-40
Cost not available
2015-SJ-41
Cost not available
2015-SJ-42
Cost not available
2015-SJ-43
Cost not available
2015-SJ-44
Cost not available
2015-SJ-45
Cost not available
2015-SJ-46
San Joaquin Total
Resource Cost ($)
Nature and Quantity
of
Personnel Used
88,000
4,000
2015-SJ-47
Cost not available
2015-SJ-48
Cost not available
2015-SJ-49
Cost not available
2015-SJ-50
Cost not available
2015-SJ-51
Cost not available
2015-SJ-52
Cost not available
2015-SJ-53
Cost not available
88,000
4,000
Total Cost ($)
(Personnel +
Resource) 4
609,432
92,000
92,000
153
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 6
Costs of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
Santa Barbara
EICOS No.
Personnel Cost ($)
(Installation Fees,
Supplies,
Equipment, etc.)
2014-SBA-46
7 monitors; 1 technician
35,504
2,520
38,024
2014-SBA-47
30,000
0
30,000
2014-SBA-48
9,000
0
9,000
2014-SBA-49
12,384
0
12,384
86,888
2,520
89,408
237,000
4,968
241,968
Santa Barbara Total
Santa Clara
2014-SCL-71
monitors and switch
costs
2014-SCL-72
(Personnel +
Resource) 4
2014-SCL-74
4 monitors
22,554
3,159
25,713
2014-SCL-75
2 monitors
11,554
1,284
12,838
2014-SCL-76
Costs related to WT 14-07
2014-SCL-77
Costs related to WT 14-07
2014-SCL-78
Costs related to WT 14-07
2014-SCL-79
Costs related to WT 14-07
2014-SCL-80
2 monitors a day;
16 monitors total
65,424
6,560
71,984
2014-SCL-81
4 monitors
22,894
625
23,519
2014-SCL-82
2 monitors
11,894
625
12,519
2014-SCL-83
4 monitors
22,894
1,284
24,178
2014-SCL-84
installation and 17 law
enforcement officers
monitoring wire
275,000
15,000
290,000
669,214
33,505
702,719
2014-SON-6
2014-SON-7
Cost not available
16 deputies; 2 HIDA
agents
Sonoma Total
Stanislaus
Total Cost ($)
Costs related to WT 14-01
Santa Clara Total
Sonoma
Resource Cost ($)
Nature and Quantity
of
Personnel Used
2014-STA-63
2 monitors per day
0
2,000
2,000
0
2,000
2,000
22,000
1,500
23,500
154
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 6
Costs of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
Stanislaus
(cont’d)
EICOS No.
Personnel Cost ($)
(Installation Fees,
Supplies,
Equipment, etc.)
2014-STA-64
3 monitors
5,040
1,000
6,040
2014-STA-65
2 monitors per day
44,000
1,500
45,500
2014-STA-67
5 monitors per day
44,000
7,000
51,000
2014-STA-68
2 monitors per day
22,000
1,500
23,500
2014-STA-69
monitors
14,678
300
14,978
2014-STA-70
3 monitors
44,000
3,000
47,000
2014-STA-71
Costs related to 14-08
2014-STA-72
Costs related to 14-08
2014-STA-73
Costs related to 14-08
2014-STA-74
Costs related to 14-08
2014-STA-75
Costs related to 14-08
2014-STA-76
Costs related to 14-08
2014-STA-77
Costs related to 14-08
Stanislaus Total
Tulare
Resource Cost ($)
Nature and Quantity
of
Personnel Used
2014-TUL-8
2014-TUL-9
wire, monitor, and
manpower costs
wire, monitor, and
manpower costs
Total Cost ($)
(Personnel +
Resource) 4
195,718
15,800
211,518
20,000
22,569
42,569
20,000
22,569
42,569
2014-TUL-10
wire, monitor, and
manpower costs
20,000
22,569
42,569
2014-TUL-11
wire, monitor, and
manpower costs
20,000
22,569
42,569
40,000
35,138
75,138
20,000
22,893
42,893
2014-TUL-12
2014-TUL-13
wire, monitor, and
manpower costs
wire, monitor, and
manpower costs
2014-TUL-14
wire, monitor, and
manpower costs
20,000
22,569
42,569
2014-TUL-15
wire, monitor,
manpower costs
20,000
22,569
42,569
155
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 6
Costs of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
EICOS No.
Tulare
(cont’d)
2014-TUL-16
2014-TUL-18
2015-TUL-19
Nature and Quantity
of
Personnel Used
wire, monitor,
manpower costs
surveillance teams,
conduit monitors
install, monitor, and
prepare transcripts
Tulare Total
Ventura
Resource Cost ($)
Total Cost ($)
Personnel Cost ($)
(Installation Fees,
Supplies,
Equipment, etc.)
20,000
22,569
42,569
213,700
6,000
219,700
43,600
3,000
46,600
457,300
225,014
682,314
(Personnel +
Resource) 4
2013-VE-74
2 monitors
39,948
2,262
42,210
2014-VE-84
9
88,000
14,750
102,750
2014-VE-85
2 monitors
61,271
2,200
63,471
66,000
13,250
79,250
2014-VE-86
2014-VE-87
2 monitors
10,331
402
10,733
2014-VE-88
4 monitors
44,000
4,500
48,500
2014-VE-89
2 monitors
47,351
1,094
48,445
2014-VE-90
2 monitors; 1 technician
6,500
2,500
9,000
2014-VE-91
4 monitors
44,000
6,500
50,500
2014-VE-92
1 monitor
6,390
2,925
9,315
2014-VE-93
1 monitor;
1 transcriptionist;
1 installer
5,869
3,575
9,444
2014-VE-94
5
95,000
11,000
106,000
2014-VE-95
15
322,000
26,400
348,400
2014-VE-96
35 monitoring
detectives
98,000
4,000
102,000
2014-VE-97
10
144,000
18,600
162,600
2014-VE-98
11 monitors;
1 technician;
1 transcriptionist
0
18,736
18,736
2014-VE-99
4 monitors
4,500
8,000
12,500
2014-VE-100
6
92,000
6,000
98,000
156
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 6
Costs of Electronic Interceptions
During Calendar Year 2014
Reporting
Jurisdiction
Ventura
(cont’d)
Resource Cost ($)
EICOS No.
Nature and Quantity
of
Personnel Used
Personnel Cost ($)
(Installation Fees,
Supplies,
Equipment, etc.)
2014-VE-101
multiple monitors and
interpreters.
60,156
3,850
64,006
2014-VE-102
4
46,000
2,400
48,400
2014-VE-103
5 monitors
12,000
12,500
24,500
2014-VE-104
2 monitors
24,500
2,800
27,300
2014-VE-105
4 monitors; 6 detectives
78,000
1,200
79,200
45,000
0
45,000
2014-VE-106
Total Cost ($)
(Personnel +
Resource) 4
2014-VE-109
2 monitors
500
600
1,100
2014-VE-110
4 monitors
26,258
1,400
27,658
2014-VE-111
1 monitor;
3 transcriptionists
26,000
1,500
27,500
2014-VE-113
3 monitors; 1 technician
25,597
3,992
29,589
Ventura Total
1,519,171
176,936
1,696,107
Total (all reporting counties)
27,952,560
3,141,596
31,094,156
157
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 7
Jurisdiction Reporting No
Electronic Interception Activity During
Calendar Year 2014
Alpine
Marin
Santa Cruz
Amador
Mariposa
Shasta
Butte
Mendocino
Sierra
Calaveras
Modoc
Siskiyou
Colusa
Mono
Solano
Del Norte
Monterey
Sutter
Glenn
Nevada
Tehama
Humboldt
Plumas
Trinity
Imperial
San Benito
Tuolumne
Inyo
San Francisco
Yolo
Lake
San Luis Obispo
Yuba
Lassen
San Mateo
158
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 8
Summary of Supplemental Reports for Interceptions
Conducted in Prior Years 2014
Motions to
Persons Convicted
Suppress
Contra Costa
2009
2013
2/5/2013
Los Angeles
Firearms; gangs
3
Narcotics and
firearms
3
13-05
846
Conspiracy;
3
USC 841(a) and
846
possession for
sales of cocaine
1
Possession for
sales of cocaine
10
Attempted
murder;
conspiracy
6
Narcotics
Pending
1
Narcotics
firearms;
13 Gangs;
conspiracy
6/3/2013
2013
Conspiracy;
unlawful firearm
possession
1
1
2013
Kern
4
Denied
13-02
Granted
13-02
Cost
($)
Offense(s)
2013
EICOS
No.
Number
Alameda
Reference
No.
Offense(s)
Reporting Report
Date of
Jurisdiction Year Application
Number
Persons Arrested
3
0
0
3
narcotics and
firearms
7
USC 841(a) and
2006
06-126
4
2006
06-191, 06-230, 06241, 06-255, 07-04,
07-23, 07-33, 07-133,
07-132, 07-136, 07179,
10
Attempted murder;
conspiracy
1
2008
2/22/2008
08-31
8
Narcotics
2009
6/3/2009
09-87
3
Narcotics;
conspiracy
1
5
3
Narcotics;
conspiracy
2009
7/21/2009
09-114
3
Narcotics;
conspiracy
1
5
3
Narcotics;
conspiracy
2009
9/2/2009
09-151
3
Narcotics;
conspiracy
1
5
3
Narcotics;
conspiracy
2009
9/24/2009
09-168
3
Narcotics;
conspiracy
1
5
3
Narcotics;
conspiracy
5
3
10/14/2009
09-183
3
Narcotics;
conspiracy
1
2009
Narcotics;
conspiracy
10, 10-23
1
Murder
1
1
Murder
2009
09-152
1
1
1
Murder
2009
09-27, 09-39
1
1
1
Murder
2009
09-152, 10-218, 10-
Murder
159
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 8
Summary of Supplemental Reports for Interceptions
Conducted in Prior Years 2014
Motions to
Persons Convicted
Suppress
Cost
($)
Narcotics;
conspiracy
Murder;
conspiracy
1
1
Murder;
conspiracy
4
Murder; assault
1
3
Murder, assault
10-61
1
Murder
1
1
Murder
3
Narcotics
3
2010
10-188
3
2010
10-184
2010
Pending
3
10-226, 11-24
Denied
1
2010
Granted
Offense(s)
EICOS
No.
Number
Los Angeles
(cont’d)
Reference
No.
Number
Reporting Report
Date of
Jurisdiction Year Application
Offense(s)
Persons Arrested
2011
9/8/2011
11-11
3
Conspiracy;
narcotics
2011
10/13/2011
11-155
3
Conspiracy;
naroctics
2
Conspiracy;
naroctics
2011
5/11/2011
11-79
1
Narcotics
1
Narcotics
2011
11/7/2011
11-196
3
Conspiracy;
naroctics
2
Narcotics
2011
9/1/2011
11-162
5
Conspiracy;
naroctics
1
Narcotics
2011
1/2/2011
11-44
1
Narcotics;
weapons
1
Narcotics;
weapons
2011
9/29/2011
11-191
4
Narcotics;
conspiracy
Narcotics;
conspiracy
2011
6/1/2011
11-117
1
Narcotics;
conspiracy
Narcotics;
conspiracy
11-49
4
Cnspiracy;
possession for
sales of cocaine
11-152, 11-178,
4
Narcotics
trafficking
2011
2011
8/2/2011
2011
11-30
1 Murder; accessory
1
1
1
4
Conspiracy;
possession for
sales of cocaine
1
Accessory after
the fact
1
Murder;
accessory
2012
4/13/2012
12-50
2
Narcotics
2
Narcotics
2012
7/20/2012
12-115
4
Narcotics
4
Narcotics
160
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 8
Summary of Supplemental Reports for Interceptions
Conducted in Prior Years 2014
Motions to
Persons Convicted
Suppress
Persons Arrested
EICOS
No.
Cost
($)
(cont’d)
2
narcotics
2
Narcotics
2012
1/13/2012
12-05
2
Narcotics
1
Narcotics
2012
1/1/2012
SW-2012-0088
2
2
Narcotics
trafficking
1
Conspiracy
Granted
Pending
12-78
Denied
7/27/2012
Los Angeles
Offense(s)
2012
Number
Offense(s)
Reference
No.
Number
Reporting Report
Date of
Jurisdiction Year Application
Conspiracy;
Narcotics
trafficking
4
Conspiracy;
possession for
sales of
methamphetamine
Ext 1, 12-52, 12-68
3
Burglary
1
3
Burglary
2012
12-64
2
Murder
1
2
Murder
2012
10-02
1
Murder
1
1
Conspiracy
2012
12-74
attempted
2 Murder;
murder
1
2
Murder;
attempted
murder
2012
12-74
1
Murder
1
1
Murder
2012
12-72
2012
12-23, 12-45, 12-45
2013
2/8/2013
13-14
3
Narcotics
3
Narcotics
2013
2/7/2013
13-16
5
Narcotics
3
Narcotics;
firearm
2013
3/4/2013
13-25
2
Narcotics;
conspiracy
1
Narcotics;
conspiracy
2013
5/3/2013
13-76
2
Narcotics;
conspiracy
1
Narcotics;
conspiracy
2013
1/2/2014
SW-2012-013
1
Narcotics
trafficking
1
Narcotics
trafficking
1
Assault
2013
13-162
1 Attempted murder
1
2014
10/31/2012
12-265
1
Narcotics
1
Narcotics
2014
6/11/2010
10-125
2
Narcotics
2
Narcotics
161
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 8
Summary of Supplemental Reports for Interceptions
Conducted in Prior Years 2014
Motions to
Persons Convicted
Suppress
Persons Arrested
Offense(s)
1
Narcotics
1
Narcotics
2014
5/4/2011
11-66
2
Narcotics
2
Narcotics
2014
4/18/2014
14-44
1
Narcotics
1
Narcotics
2014
4/14/2014
14-41
1
Narcotics
trafficking
1
Narcotics
trafficking
7
Narcotics
1
Narcotics
7
Narcotics
trafficking
6
Narcotics
trafficking
2
Murder;
kidnapping
2014
Sonoma
5/15/2013
13-126 (Riverside)
0
1
Pending
12-135
Denied
8/21/2012
Granted
2014
2014
San Diego
Cost
($)
Number
EICOS
No.
Offense(s)
Los Angeles
(cont’d)
Reference
No.
Number
Reporting Report
Date of
Jurisdiction Year Application
1
2009
07-68, 07-70, 07-73
2012
12-10, 12-16, 12-22
2012SD-137
1
Narcotics
2012
12-19, 12-24
2012SD-149
1
Narcotics and
gangs
2012
11-42, 11-44, 12-05,
12-08, 12-18, 12-20,
12-25, 12-28, 12-31
2012SD-159
2
Narcotics
2013
13-14
2013SD-171
2
Voluntary
manslaughter
0
0
2014
8/14/2014
1
Murder
0
0
0
0
162
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 9
List of Electronic Interception Orders
Approved But Never Used or Installed
Calendar Year 2014
Electronic Interception Orders
Approved and Installed But Never Used
Electronic Interception Orders
Approved But Never Installed
2014-FR-10
13-05 (Alameda)
2014-FR-12
2014-LA-785
2014-LA-837
2014-LA-846
2014-LA-865
2014-LA-875
2014-RIV1509
2014-MAD-11
2014-SAC-55
2014-MAD-14
2014-SAC-58
2014-RIV-978
2014-SBD-541
2014-RIV-979
2014-SBD-556
2014-RIV-1015
2014-RIV-1038
2014-RIV-1069
2014-RIV-1077
2014-RIV-1105
2014-RIV-1107
2014-RIV-1126
2014-RIV-1140
2014-RIV-1147
2014-RIV-1159
2014-RIV-1189
2014-RIV-1228
2014-RIV-1230
2014-RIV-1274
163
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Table 9
List of Electronic Interception Orders
Approved But Never Used or Installed
Calendar Year 2014
Electronic Interception Orders
Approved and Installed But Never Used
Electronic Interception Orders
Approved But Never Installed
2014-RIV-1279
2014-RIV-1314
2014-RIV-1325
2014-RIV-1448
2014-RIV-1462
2014-RIV-1560
2014-SD-194
164
California Electronic Interceptions Report
Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Appendix A: Penal Code section 629.62
“Report by Attorney General”
(a) The Attorney General shall prepare and submit an annual report to the Legislature, the Judicial Council, and the
Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts on interceptions conducted under the authority of this
chapter during the preceding year. Information for this report shall be provided to the Attorney General by any
prosecutorial agency seeking an order pursuant to this chapter.
(b) The report shall include all of the following data:
(1)
The number of orders or extensions applied for.
(2)
The kinds of orders or extensions applied for.
(3)
The fact that the order or extension was granted as applied for, was modified, or was denied.
(4)
The number of wire or electronic communication devices that are the subject of each order granted.
(5)
The period of interceptions authorized by the order, and the number and duration of any extensions of
the order.
(6)
The offense specified in the order or application, or extension of an order.
(7)
The identity of the applying law enforcement officer and agency making the application and the person
authorizing the application.
(8)
The nature of the facilities from which or the place where communications were to be intercepted.
(9)
A general description of the interceptions made under the order or extension, including (A) the number
of persons whose communications were intercepted, (B) the number of communications intercepted, (c) the
percentage of other communications intercepted, and (d) the approximate nature, amount, and cost of the
manpower and other resources used in the interceptions.
(10)
The number of arrests resulting from interceptions made under the order or extension, and the offenses
for which arrests were made.
(11)
The number of trials resulting from the interceptions.
(12)
The number of motions to suppress made with respect to the interceptions, and the number granted or
denied.
(13)
The number of convictions resulting from the interceptions and the offenses for which the convictions
were obtained and a general assessment of the importance of the interceptions.
(14)
Except with regard to the initial report required by this section, the information required by paragraphs
(9) to (13), inclusive, with respect to orders or extensions obtained in a preceding calendar year.
(15)
The date of the order for service of inventory made pursuant to Section 629.68, confirmation of
compliance with the order, and the number of notices sent.
(16)
Other data that the Legislature, the Judicial Council, or the Director of the Administrative Office of the
United States Courts shall require.
(c) The annual report shall be filed no later than April of each year, and shall also include a summary analysis of the
data reported pursuant to subdivision (b). The Attorney General may issue regulations prescribing the content and
form of the reports required to be filed pursuant to this section by any prosecutorial agency seeking an order to
intercept wire or electronic communications.
(d) The Attorney General shall, upon the request of an individual making an application, provide any information
known to him or her as a result of these reporting requirements that would enable the individual making an application
to comply with paragraph (6) of subdivision (a) of Section 629.50.
165