5-8 Writing Vision: Effective communication is fundamental for success in today’s world. In order to prepare for the rigors of high school, university, and to have the career options that they want, our scholars must leave our schools with the ability to: demonstrate control over all aspects of the writing process, interpret texts and clearly communicate their thoughts in the most effective manner and in multiple formats, independently decide which format, strategy, and genre are best suited to the task at hand. Part A: Our Writing Philosophy: As a means to this end, we see these five tenets as fundamental pillars for instruction across grades 5-8 writing class. Good Writing Spans across Traits, Strategies, and Genres Vertical Alignment is Necessary Mini-lessons, Exemplars, and Time for Writing Time for Talk and Feedback through Conferences Writing Process, Assessment, and Analysis Although there are genre-specific strategies, most traits and strategies are relevant to all types of writing. We believe that scholars need multiple exposures to the same genre over the course of the year, as opposed to an extended deep dive into one genre at a time. This strategy allows us to ensure that genres “live” and are not forgotten from year to year. We believe that our children are scholars regardless of grade level. In order to provide them with a thoughtful and rigorous 5-8 education experience, we must have vertical alignment within our teaching and our approach to assessment. We believe that in order to do anything well, we need to know what the goal is and have ample time to practice. In writing class, teachers must share exemplars of the genre, style, or mode of writing with scholars. Aims should be manageable and measureable so that they can be taught in a brief mini-lesson. Children must have lots of independent time to write in writing class. We believe that in order to progress as individual writers, children must have frequent feedback in the form of conferences. This feedback should push scholars out of their comfort zones and into stretch zones. We believe that writing should be strategically assessed and analyzed multiple times over the course of the year. At the beginning of the year, teachers should diagnose their scholars’ strengths and weaknesses (based on a beginning of the year diagnostic or data from the previous year) so they can adjust their long-term and unit plans based on their scholars’ needs. Additionally, in order for scholars to demonstrate control over all aspects of the writing process, they must go through the writing process frequently – about every two weeks. Part B: Breaking it Down Beliefs/ Philosophy Mini-lessons, Exemplars, and Time for What this Means for our Scholars Children must be engaged in some aspect of the writing cycle for 20-30 minutes in What this Means for our Teachers Lessons should be brief. They should be mini-lessons focused on a specific skill in which most, if not all, Writing Time for Talk and Feedback through Conferences class daily. For example, this could mean drafting independently, brainstorming through listing, or reading aloud a piece of writing and revising alongside a partner. By November of 5th grade, scholars should have the stamina to write for 30 minutes (In Connecticut, this goal may need to be adjusted in order to align with the state test). By 7thgrade, scholars should be able to revise and edit independently during this writing time. Children must have mentor texts in writing class. They must read examples of great writing (from all sources published, teacher and student) so that they can model their writing on these exemplars. Children must receive written and/or verbal feedback on their writing at least twice a week during the writing conference. Children should know what they are working on, both in terms of the daily mini-lesson and through teacher feedback. They need a way to hold onto their notes so that they too are held accountable for their writing goals. Student Partnerships: There is a relationship between oral and literate language. Students must have opportunities to share and rehearse their ideas before and after putting pen to paper. Students should have a writing partner who they can scholars need continued development. Aims should be measurable, bitesized, and rigorous. While planning units and individual lessons, teaches should use mentor texts and authors as exemplars that will help them set benchmarks for student achievement during the unit of study. In class, teachers should use mentor texts and authors as exemplars that show writing traits, strategies, and author’s craft in action. Teachers should provide verbal feedback at least twice a week during the writing conference. This feedback should be specific to the individual needs identified by the teacher. Teachers need to be up to date on their scholars’ strengths and deficits in writing. Teachers must keep track of their conferences – including notes on compliments and areas of growth. These notes should be organized in a conferring binder/log so that the teacher can quickly and effectively push their scholars into the stretch zone during conferences. Teachers should roam around their class with a clipboard on which they can log information about their conferences and formative assessment information. Vertical Alignment is Necessary turn and talk with and bounce ideas off of before, during, and after writing. Scholars must study many genres and types of writing. Each grade will spiral back to genre/skills/units of study taught in previous grades in order to deepen their understanding about the genre/skills/unit of study. Scholars must go through the writing process frequently. Good Writing Spans across Traits, Strategies, and Genres Writing Process, Assessment, and Analysis By the end of 8th grade scholars should show independent mastery of all different types of genres. In 5th and 6th grade, scholars will practice many types of writing and master certain strategies as denoted on the scope and sequence. In 7th and 8th grade, scholars will master specific genres, such as the literary essay. Scholars will complete a diagnostic at the beginning of the year. This diagnostic should have scholars go through the writing process so that teachers can assess each step of the process. Teachers must manage the “time for talk” so that students spend the majority of their writing time actually writing. Teachers must use the same language for assessment. Teachers should use the language of 6+1 traits in order to push scholars towards their writing potential. For example, an 8th grade and 5th grade teachers should be able to talk about voice using the same vocabulary. Across all grades, teachers should plan roughly 2 week process units that take their scholars through the writing cycle. As scholars become increasingly independent, they should have more autonomy in moving through the writing cycle. Not every piece should go through the entire writing process. Genres will be introduced and revisited over the course of the school year. Teachers should use rubrics to assess writing. Genre should be woven in throughout the year, but should not be the sole focus. Teachers should make explicit the traits, strategies, and skills that are relevant to all types of good writing. Teachers should revisit genres/modes of writing over the course of the year in order to help scholars deepen understanding of that specific genre and make the learning “stick.” Teachers will grade the diagnostic looking for students’ strengths and weaknesses in the following categories: the overall writing process, genre-specific skills, and 6+1 traits. Teachers should track mastery of the Scholars will complete an ondemand assessment 2-5 times a year. They will go through the entire writing process during this time During the assessment or after the entire assessment they will receive feedback (1 positive and 1 area for improvement) for each part of the writing process (prewriting, drafting, revising, proofreading, editing). daily aim and information gleaned from student conferences. This can be on a clipboard and then logged in a binder or tracker. 2-5 times per year, teachers should analyze their writing across the grade level. Scholars should be given the same on-demand writing assignment and instructed to go through the entire writing process.* (Some schools take a 3 hour block to do this in one sitting, school-wide. Others extend this over several days within the writing block.)** Teachers will grade each part of the writing process according to the 6 + 1 traits. Teachers will analyze the results in order to get a sense of both horizontal and vertical areas of strength and improvement. They will use this information to tweak their unit plans and make sure that they are aligned both horizontally and vertically across grades. Computer and technological skills gain importance on a daily basis. Although we understand the importance of these skills, we know that many of our schools have limited technology access for students. As such, we will include an optional category as part of our curriculum map. In this section, we will include skills such as: word processing, computer skills, typing, etc. * At this time this will not be an assessment (like the IAs) designed by AF Network Support. However, there should be agreement across each grade level at individual schools as to the content and the grading of the assessment. We will post suggested topics for on-demand Writing assessments, but these do not have to be used. Teachers have the freedom to develop their own instead. Since this will be the first year implementing this vision, we want to make sure that we leave room for innovation at the school level and do not mandate practices that are not tried and tested. During the 10-11 school year, we will work to collect feedback and best practices from each school so that we can make recommendations for this process for the following school year. **KIPP Infinity implements their quarterly on-demand writing as an entire school for a three hour window. This is a school-wide initiative for them and they make sure to stop the entire school for this quarterly assessment. Before scholars are allowed to move on to the next part of the process they must get feedback from one of the two teachers in the room. They are given feedback (1 positive, 1 area for improvement) for each part of the process. Scholars are then allowed to move onto the next part of the process. They may choose to incorporate feedback in order to improve their writing or not. Part C: Books that Support This Vision Traits of Writing: The Complete Guide for Middle School by Ruth Culham Assessing Writers by Carl Anderson In the Middle: New Understandings About Writing, Reading, and Learning by Nancie Atwell