Rev. 01 ECO Description Initial draft for comment Author ZKhan Approved Date 6/5/2015 TESS Instrument Contamination Control Implementation Plan Dwg. No. 37-15041 Revision 01 5/Jun/2015 37-15041 i Revision 01 Table of Contents 1.0 1.1 Purpose ................................................................................................................ 1 Scope .......................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 List of Acronyms ................................................................................................. 1 3.0 Definitions ............................................................................................................ 2 4.0 Applicable and Reference Documents .............................................................. 3 5.0 Contamination Control Flow .............................................................................. 4 6.0 Implementation of Contamination Control Requirements ............................... 8 6.1 6.2 6.3 Materials and Equipment Required .......................................................................... 8 Cleanliness Inspection and Monitoring Methods .................................................... 8 Verification and Cleaning Schedules ......................................................................14 37-15041 ii Revision 01 Preface This is the TESS Instrument Contamination Control Implementation Plan. It describes the instrument contamination budget and the processes for monitoring and verifying instrument cleanliness. Revision 01 is the initial draft for comments. 37-15041 iii Revision 01 1.0 Purpose The purpose of this document is to describe the TESS instrument contamination budget, contamination control measures and the processes for monitoring and verifying instrument cleanliness to meet the contamination requirements laid out in the TESS Instrument Contamination Control Plan (Document number 37-15040) 1.1 Scope The implementation of contamination control for the TESS instrument is addressed for the following phases till delivery of the instrument to Orbital ATK: fabrication, assembly, and instrument integration and testing. The TESS instrument will undergo processing at various locations including MIT Kavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Research (MKI) building NE83 and MIT Lincoln Labs (LL). This document covers instrument contamination control implementation at both these facilities. Any contamination control at vendor facilities will be described in vendor documents. 2.0 List of Acronyms AI&T CCE CCM CCP CVCM ESD FED-STD GSE GSFC HEPA IPA I&T LL MIL-STD MKI MLI NVR PAR QA QCM 37-15041 Assembly, Integration and Test Contamination Control Engineer Contamination Control Manager Contamination Control Plan Collected Volatile Condensable Materials Electrostatic Discharge Federal Standard Ground Support Equipment Goddard Space Flight Center High Efficiency Particulate Air Isopropyl Alcohol Integration and Test Lincoln Labs Military Standard MIT Kavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Research Multi-Layer Insulation Non-Volatile Residue Performance Assurance Requirements (Document) Quality Assurance Quartz Crystal Microbalance 1 Revision 01 TML TQCM TVAC VCS Total Mass Loss Temperature-Controlled Quartz Crystal Microbalance Thermal Vacuum Visibly Clean Sensitive 3.0 Definitions Cleanroom Room in which the concentration of airborne particles is controlled to specified limits. Clean Zone Defined space in which the concentration of airborne particles is controlled to specified limits. Clean zones are classified in accordance with IEST-14644, which describes the maximum number of particles permitted per cubic foot of air. Contamination Any unwanted material that causes degradation in the desired function of an instrument or flight hardware. Contamination Organized action to control the level of contamination. Control Fiber A particle whose length-to-width ratio exceeds 10:1 with a minimum length of 100 microns. Gross Cleaning hardware surfaces to visual inspection standards Cleaning Level x per The cleanliness level defined by a number and/or letter MIL-STD designating the particle distribution and molecular cleanliness, 1246 respectively. Nitrogen Pressurized flow of clean, dry nitrogen through a system in Purge order to displace impurities and reactive species. Non-Volatile Soluble material remaining after evaporation of a volatile liquid Residue which usually causes degradation in the desired function of an instrument or flight hardware. Particle A small quantity of solid or liquid material with definable shape or mass with a length to width ratio less than 10:1. Particle Size Expressed as the apparent maximum linear dimension or diameter of the particle. Precision A cleaning procedure done in a controlled environment to attain Cleaning a specific level of cleanliness. This procedure follows gross cleaning. Sensitive Any surface of flight hardware that must meet a specified Surface cleanliness level to ensure the minimum performance levels. Solvent Method of cleaning surfaces with a stream of filtered solvent Flushing under pressure, which is directed against a surface to dislodge and rinse away any foreign material. Solvent A quantitative method of verifying MIL-STD-1246 molecular Washes cleanliness levels by measuring molecular contamination in a solvent, which was washed over a surface and collected. Surface An established level of maximum allowable particulate and/or Cleanliness NVR contamination ranging from visibly clean to specific MILLevel STD-1246 levels (e.g., Level 300A, Level 300B, etc.). 37-15041 2 Revision 01 Swab Sample Tape Lifts Vapor Degrease Visibly Clean A qualitative method of identifying contaminants by analyzing the residue on a solvent-soaked swab that was wiped over a surface. A quantitative method of verifying MIL-STD-1246 particulate cleanliness levels by measuring particulate contamination on a sample of tape that has come in contact with the surface one wants to examine. The method is described in ASTM E1216: Standard Practice for Sampling Surface Particulate Contamination by Tape Lift. Item to be cleaned is exposed to heated solvent vapors that condense on the part and wash away contaminant. The achievement of a clean surface as seen without optical aids (except corrected vision) as measured by a specified method. Three levels of visibly clean (VC) requirements are defined in JSC-SN-C-0005C 4.0 Applicable and Reference Documents The applicable and reference documents mentioned in this TESS Instrument Contamination Control Implementation Plan are listed in Table 1 and Table 2. Table 1 - Applicable TESS Documents Document Number 37-10037 37-15040 Document Title TESS Contamination Control Plan TESS Instrument Contamination Control Plan Table 2 - Contamination Control Reference Documents Document Number MIL-STD- 1246 JSC SP-R-022A GSFC-TLS-PR-7324-O 1 ASTM E-595 IES-RP-CC-018-89-T ISO-14644 – 1-7 FED-STD-209 JSC-SN-C-0005D 37-15041 Document Title Product Cleanliness Levels and Contamination Control Specification Vacuum Stability Requirements of Polymeric Materials for Spacecraft Applications Contamination Control Procedures for the Tape Lift Sampling Surfaces Methods of Test, Total Mass and Controlled Volatile Condensable Materials from Outgassing in a Vacuum Environment Cleanroom Housekeeping – Operating and Monitoring Procedures Cleanrooms and Associated Controlled Environments Airborne Particulate Cleanliness Classes in Cleanrooms and Clean Zones Contamination Control Requirements for the Space Shuttle Program (NASA) 3 Revision 01 JPG 5322.1 Rev. E PS-3-21 ASTM E 1235-8 ASTM E 1234-07 PS-3-27 Contamination Control Requirements Manual (NASA) Precision Cleaning [MIT Lincoln Labs document] Standard Test Method for Gravimetric Determination of Nonvolatile Residue (NVR) in Environmentally Controlled Areas for Spacecraft Standard Practice for Handling, Transporting, and Installing Nonvolatile Residue (NVR) Sample Plates Used in Environmentally Controlled Areas of Spacecraft Implementation of Contamination Control Requirements [MIT Lincoln Labs document] 5.0 Contamination Control Budget A flow chart of the assembly, integration and test (AI&T) process, developed by the Instrument I&T Manager, is used to elucidate the cleanliness environment and contamination control actions during each step of AI&T and captured in a table. This is the basis of maintaining a contamination budget to achieve the requirements set forth in the TESS Instrument Contamination Control Plan (37-15040). Since the AI&T flow development is ongoing, a complete flowchart and associated table is out of scope of this document. However, Figure 1 and Table 3 shows an example of one part of the AI&T process. The methods used to achieve contamination control during AI&T are detailed in the following sections. Figure 1 - Example AI&T Flow 37-15041 4 Revision 01 Table 3 - Example Contamination Budget Exposure Time Step ID Step Name Location Environment LEN-05 Procure Lenses GL Scientific LEN-06 Procure Coatings GL Scientific LEN-10 Inspect lenses MIT LL Class 1000 0.5 days LEN-11 RTV Pads on Lenses MIT LL Class 100 7 days Procure LEN-12 Barrel/Bezels/Hardware MIT LL n/a n/a Inspect LEN-13 Barrel/Bezels/Hardware MIT LL n/a n/a LEN-14 Paint Barrel/Bezels/Hardware MIT LL n/a n/a Bakeout LEN-15 Barrel/Bezels/Hardware MIT LL n/a n/a LEN-16 Lenses into bezels MIT LL Class 1000 7 days LEN-17 Cold cycle bezels MIT LL Class 1000 1 day Bezel modal response LEN-20 characterization MIT LL Class 1000 1 day LEN-22 Lens Bezels into Barrel MIT LL Class 1000 7-14 days LEN-23 Ambient Interferometry MIT LL Class 1000 1 day Torque and stake all LEN-25 hardware MIT LL Class 1000 0.5 day LEN-28 Lens assembly complete MIT LL n/a 37-15041 5 Revision 01 Exposure Time Step ID Step Name Location Environment LEN-19 Fabricate Cold Shim MIT LL n/a LEN-29 Ship lens and shim MIT LL Cleaned to same precision level CAML01 Integrate Lens and Detector Assembly MKI CCD Test Area - Class 1000 5 days INTERNAL LENSES SEALED CAML02 Cold Testing - Verify Focus & Performance MKI CAML04 Ship unit MKI to LL Camera Calibration Area Class 1000 3 weeks MKI Install Lens Hood 2 days CAML05 Vibration Testing MIT LL procedure in progress CAML07 Ship unit LL to MKI MIT LL procedure under review CAML08 TVAC Testing MIT LL 5 days 15 days The contamination budget will be maintained by the Contamination Control Lead at MKI. 6.0 Contamination Control Measures To achieve the contamination control requirements, the following measures are used: 1. Maintenance of clean room environments as described in the TESS Instrument CCP 37-15041 6 Revision 01 2. Monitoring of component cleanliness as described in the following sections 3. Bakeout of components to limit outgassing on-orbit. The basic bakeout requirements are described in the TESS Instrument CCP. However, detailed bakeout procedures have been developed for several instrument components. These are as follows: List which things being baked out and link to procedures 4. Cleaning components when necessary, as approved by Contamination Control Lead at LL, Instrument Lead SE…etc. – link to what? 5. Use of contamination control heaters during thermal vacuum (TVAC) testing Finally, a special contamination control measure is to install contamination control heaters on the instrument cameras for use during TVAC testing. During TVAC testing, when the temperature of the chamber is raised after a test, the heaters are used to raise the temperature of the exposed optics faster so that they are not the coldest item in the chamber thus preventing contaminants from migrating to their surfaces. These heaters are described in Section 8.0. 7.0 Verification of Contamination Requirements To verify the requirements laid out in the TESS Instrument Contamination Control Plan (37-15040), the cleanliness of components will be monitored in various ways. A. In general, components will be subject to a light inspection (described in the following section) at the following events: 1. Upon receipt from another facility 2. Before shipping to another facility 3. Before the start of a test 4. After the end of a test The results of these inspections will be logged. B. The NVR cleanliness levels for optical components will be calculated for each AI&T step using the NVR deposition rates at the facility, measured with methods defined in Section 8 and the exposure times of the components during the step. The optical components will be assumed to have zero NVR deposition at the start of integration and test processing at MIT Lincoln Labs and MIT Kavli 37-15041 7 Revision 01 Institute (NE-83) i.e. they will be assumed to arrive completely clean from the manufacturer. During each step of AI&T, the environmental conditions and exposure time of the components will be logged. C. As a backup, witness plates will follow the instrument cameras during AI&T to log cumulative particulate and NVR contamination levels. These will be analyzed as needed, determined by the Contamination Control Leads at LL and MKI. 8.0 Implementation of Contamination Control Measures and Verification 8.1 Materials and Equipment Required In clean area: Exhaust hood- for flushing plates and other samples Tongs- Precision cleaned laboratory type Clean glass bottles- grade suitable for residue analysis Full-face protective splash-shield Beakers – assorted sizes (500, 1000 ml) Glass Funnel- approximately 6 inch diameter Aluminum Foil – Clean (400-1821) Gloves- cleanroom approved nitrile Isopropanol- high purity, residue less than 1 ppm UV Lamp- at least 100 watts Bright White Light Lamp-greater than 200 candle power Glass Syringe- 20 ml On instrument: Contamination Control Heaters: Set of three 10 W kapton heaters, mounted on each camera, measuring 0.5” x 2” wired in parallel controlled by a single power supply. Link to design description? 8.2 Cleanliness Inspection and Monitoring Methods 6.1.1 Non-volatile Residue (NVR) Monitoring NVR is monitored in the clean work area where devices are built by two methods: a. Witness Plate and, b. Surface Acoustics Micro-balance (SAWM). a. Witness Plates: An outside analytical laboratory, similar to Balazs Analytical Services is used to provide pre-measured wafers to be placed in the work area, where devices are assembled. These wafers are kept for all the time the assembly 37-15041 8 Revision 01 is carried out. The wafers are returned for the NVR analysis to the laboratory at an interval that is decided by the project manager. Witness plates are shown in the Figure 2. This method is used both at Lincoln Labs and the MIT Kavli Institute (NE-83). NE83 as well. Do a basic fallout level. b. Surface Acoustics Wave Micro-balance (SAWM): A real time non-volatile residue monitor, a SAWM device is utilized to monitor the NVR buildup continuously in the area the device is assembled. Currently, Aim-200 Non-Volatile Residue Monitor, manufactured by Particle Measuring Systems, is used for the NVR monitoring. It could be replaced by any comparable device. SAWM device has a sensitivity of 3.2 pg/cm2/Hz. A typical NVR accumulation graph is shown for the deposition over a period of one month in Figure 3. The NVR monitoring unit is shown on the work bench in Room I-209 at Lincoln Labs. This monitoring method is only used at Lincoln Labs. c. Flush Method: NVR on Space Hardware (If a test is required on the actual parts.) Warning Any potential adverse effect on the part due to attack by solvents should be evaluated before using this test on the space hardware. A test method, similar to the one described in the ASTM E 1235-08 is used for the NVR test on the space hardware. The ASTM test method describes the use of a witness plate. However, for this test, procedure described in this section is used on the actual parts. Note All the glass containers are precision cleaned according to PS-3-21 before using for this test. The beakers and other equipment should be covered with oil-free aluminum foil, if stored for more than 4 hours. Fed. Spec. Food Service Grade aluminum foil, oil-free, Federal Stock No. 8135-00-724-0551 has been found to be satisfactory. (1) The part is inspected for the particulate cleanliness, as per the requirement, following the process in Section 4.1.3. (2) Select the surface to be sampled. The surface should be representative of the item being tested. That is, it should include flat areas, welds, holes, threads, etc., if they are part of the item. The results will be reported in square feet therefore it is necessary to record the size of the area sampled. (3) Select a surface of the part to be flushed with a known quantity (typically 100 ml/sf) of a high purity solvent. High purity grade (residue less than 1 ppm) isopropyl alcohol, or methylene chloride is recommended for this test. Methylene chloride is preferred solvent, if does not react with the article being tested. The certificate of analysis for the solvent should confirm the residue level below 1 ppm. (4) Use proper protective equipment at all the time, for example splash-shield and gloves. (5) Minimum surface area requirements for the NVR test are presented in the Table 1. (6) Flush the surface from top to bottom and side-to-side several times and collect the runoff in the clean container. Ensure that the entire sample area is thoroughly flushed. (7) Control sample of the solvent should be exposed to all operations and procedures except the actual flushing of the surface being tested. Normally, the same 37-15041 9 Revision 01 amount of solvent is used in the control sample as used to flush the surface being sampled. The level measured during the control test should be no more than 10% of the allowable value from the item being tested. The results of the control are to be backed out of the measured values. (8) All the solvent after the rinsing should be collected in a clean bottle, suitable for the organic residue analysis. The clean bottles should be rinsed with 20 ml of the high purity grade solvent, same as used for the test. The bottle should have proper label. (9) Collected samples should be properly packaged and shipped for the NVR analysis to be conducted by Balazs Analytical Services*, or, other approved laboratory. Always include a control sample (100 ml, or, the same quantity used for the sample flush) of the solvent used for the NVR rinse. (10) In case, the sample fails, have the sample cleaned a second time. If it still fails, contact Contamination Control engineering for resolution. (11) Complete the NVR Test Form provided in the Appendix of this document. (*Balazs Analytical Services, 46409 Landing Parkway, Fremont CA 94538 Phone: 510624-4000) Table 4 Minimum Surface Area Required Minimum Surface Area Required based on solvent NVR background (column C) and based on the sensitivity of the balance (column D) A B C D 1246C Level Maximum allowable NVR per 0.1m2 Definition of a Small Part Area Anything Less Than: Minimum Surface Area Required A/10 0.1 mg 1000 cm2 (155.0 in2) (1.1 ft2t) 200 cm2 (31.0 in2) (.22 ft2) A/5 0.2 mg 500 cm2 (77.5 in2) (.54 ft2t) 100 cm2 (15.5 in2) (.11 ft2) A/2 0.5 mg 200 cm2 (31.0 in2) (.22 ft2t) 40 cm2 (6.2 in2) (.043 ft2) A 1.0 mg 100 cm2 (15.5 in2) (.11 ft2t) 20 cm2 (3.1 in2) (.022 ft2) B 2.0 mg 50 cm2 (7.8 in2) (.065 ft2t) 10 cm2 (1.6 in2) (.01 ft2) C 3.0 mg 33.3 cm2 (5.2in2) (.033 ft2t) 7 cm2 (1.1 in2) (.008 ft2) There are three distinct groups based on sample-sizes: a. Parts with a surface area greater than column C of Table 1 should be verified per this work instruction. b. Parts with a surface area between the values in column C and column D of Table 1 should be verified per this work instruction with 30 mL of solvent and a control of 30 mL of solvent. 37-15041 10 Revision 01 c. Parts with a surface area less than column D of Table need special considerations. 6.1.2 Particle Monitoring Particles in the Clean Room are monitored by: a. Particle Counters, b. Witness Plates a. Particle Counter Particles in the Lincoln Labs Clean Room I-209 and I-214 are continuously measured by particle counter, LASAIR II 310A manufactured by Particle Measuring Systems. These clean rooms are maintained at Class 10,000 (FED-STD-209). The work benches in these clean rooms are laminar flow type maintaining a cleanliness level of Class 100. Particles in the MKI Clean Tents in NE83 are monitored by the following particle counters: HandiLaz Mini manufactured by Particle Measuring Systems and Met One 273 A-B by Beckman Coulter. These clean tents are maintained at Class 1000 (FED-STD209) with laminar flow workbenches maintaining a cleanliness level of Class 100. b. Witness Plates for Particulates Clean polished 6 inch diameter silicon wafers are used as witness plates to determine particulate fall out rate in the work area. Typically, particles on these wafers are measured at 2 weeks intervals using a Surfscan 5000 unit manufactured by KLA Tencor. This provides particle size distribution over a selected particle size range. Measurements from this unit are used to verify the specified level of cleanliness requirements (as per standard MIL-STD-1246). In case the particulate level on the witness plate does not meet the cleanliness requirements, the hardware should be cleaned to bring it in compliance. In many instances, a few large particles that have fallen on the surface, once cleaned, bring the surface in compliance with the requirements. Cumulative fallout of particles for periods of 3 weeks is shown in the Figure 4. 6.1.3 Light Inspections Visual inspection is done using black (UV) light or white light. The requirements of the Visually Clean Levels (VC-I to VC-IV) are given in Table 5. Visibly clean, using white light is the absence of all particulates and non-particulates visible to normal unaided eye (except corrected vision). UV inspection light source should be no less than 100 watts and during inspection should not be more than 18 inch from the inspected item. During UV inspection light from other sources should not be more than 5 ft-candles. If visual contamination is present, the hardware must be cleaned and then re-inspected under the same light conditions. If during UV inspection there is any evidence of fluorescence (presence of an organic contaminant) the item or surface must be re-cleaned. If recleaning does not reduce the fluorescence, it should be determined whether the fluorescing material is a contaminant or the substrate surface. Inspections for verifying cleanliness Levels 500 to 1000, or VC-I and VC-II, the above inspection method is adequate. Inspection for Levels 200 to 300 should be conducted 37-15041 11 Revision 01 using a 3X magnifier in addition to the bright and UV light sources. For the verification of Levels 50 to 100 a 10X magnifier is recommended. As an example, once a surface is inspected with a 3X magnifier using the bright light and UV light, and all the particles visible (~ 10 to 15 microns and larger) are removed, the surface will meet the cleanliness Level 200 requirements. Table 5 - Visually Clean Levels [Ref: A. C. Tribble, Fundamentals of Contamination Control. Bellingham, Wash: SPIE Optical Engineering Press, 2000.] Level Illumination (ft -candles) Inspection Distance Magnification UV Light Resolution Limit (µm) Standard VC-I 50 5-10 ft 1 no 600-1200 Sensitive VC-I1/2 50 2-4 ft 1 no 240-480 Highly Sensitive VC-II 100 6-18 in 1 no 60-180 Highly Sensitive VC-III 100-200 6-18 in 1 no 10-90 Highly Sensitive VC-IV 100-200 6-18 in 2-7 yes ~10 Notes 37-15041 (1) One-foot candle (lumens per square foot) is equivalent to 10.76 lumens per square meter. (2) Cleaning is required if the surface in question does not meet VC under the specified incident light and observation distance conditions. (3) Exposed and accessible surfaces only. (4) Initial cleaning is mandatory; Note (2) applies thereafter. (5) Areas of suspected contamination may be examined at distances closure than specified for final verification. (6) The notes which apply to each VC levels are: Standard: (2) (3) (5) Sensitive: (2) (3) (5) Highly Sensitive: (3) (4) 12 Revision 01 Figure 2 Witness Plates and Aim-200 SA WM Monitor on the Workbench in I-209 Room Figure 3 NVR Accumulated Over Two Months 37-15041 13 Revision 01 Figure 4 Cumulative Particles on a 6 inch Diameter Witness Wafer Over 2 Week Periods 8.3 Verification and Cleaning Schedules Cleanliness verification and monitoring will occur at a frequency decided by the Contamination Control Leads at LL and MKI, others?. If the contamination levels on the hardware exceed the cleanliness requirements, a cleaning will be scheduled. The cleanings will be performed by the trained and qualified technicians following the process outlined in the Lincoln Laboratory Process Specification PS-3-.21. 37-15041 14 Revision 01 APPENDIX A A1 CLEANLINESS LEVELS Surface Cleanliness Levels * Table 6 data from IEST-STD-CC1246D, Table 1. *From NASA JSC-SN-C-005 Rev. D, Tables A.1 and A2) Table 6 Surface Cleanliness Levels Cleanliness Level Particle Size (µm) Maximum allowable concentration limits for particles of stated size and larger Particles per 0.1m2 of surface area or 0.1 liter of gas or liquid (N) 2 53.1 5 22.7 15 3.3 25 1 5 166 15 24.6 25 7.2 50 1 5 1780 15 264 25 78.4 50 10.7 100 1 15 4180 25 1230 50 169 100 15.8 25 50 100 200 37-15041 15 Revision 01 300 200 1 25 7450 50 1020 100 95 250 2.2 300 1 50 11800 100 1090 250 26.3 500 1 50 95800 100 8910 250 213 500 8.1 750 1 100 42600 250 1020 500 38.7 750 4.7 1000 1 500 750 1000 Example: Level 300 would be particulate level 300. Level 300 C would be particulate level 300 plus NVR level C. NVR (Nonvolatile Residue) Levels 37-15041 Level Maximum Quantity NVR Per 0.1 Square Meters A 1 mg. 16 Revision 01 B 2 mg. C 3 mg. D 4 mg. Notes (1) 37-15041 Inspection criteria shall be specified at the discretion of the procuring agency. In the event that cleaning is necessary to achieve the GC level, evidence that cleaning was performed will constitute verification of GC level. (2) Inspection criteria shall be specified at the discretion of the procuring agency. Refer to Table A.2 for inspection criteria options that are applicable for the Orbiter payload (cargo) bay, payload canister, and payloads during Space Shuttle Orbiter/payload integrated operations at launch and landing sites. (3) Particulate and NVR allowables are based on 0.1 square meters (1 square foot) of surface area. Flush fluid quantity for sampling shall be 100 milliliters per 0.1 square meters (1 square foot) of surface area. Small parts should be grouped together to obtain 0.1 square meters (1 square foot) of surface area. For determination of NVR fallout in environmentally controlled areas, see Paragraph 2.4. (4) Maximum quantity per 1.0 standard cubic meter (35 standard cubic feet) of effluent gas when systems are being evaluated by purging. If feasible, the sampling must be accomplished at a maximum system operational flow rate. (5) Unlimited means particulate in this size range is not counted; however, if the accumulation of this silt is sufficient to interfere with the analysis, the sample shall be rejected. 17 Revision 01 A2 Visual Cleanliness Levels GC Generally Clean (1) Freedom from manufacturing residue, dirt, oil, grease, processing debris or other extraneous contamination. This level can be achieved by washing, wiping, blowing, vacuuming, brushing, or rinsing. The GC level shall not be designated for hardware that is sensitive to contamination. VC Visibly Clean (2) The absence of all particulate and non particulate matter visible to the normal unaided (except corrected vision) eye. Particulate is identified as matter of miniature size with observable length, width, and thickness. Nonparticulate is film matter without definite dimension. This level, with the exception of the Orbiter payload (cargo) bay, payload canister and payloads, requires precision cleaning methods, but no particle count. VC + UV Visible Clean Plus Ultraviolet (2) Visibly clean (as defined above) and inspected with the aid of an ultraviolet light (black light) of 3200 to 3800 Angstroms wavelength (3.2 x 10-7 TO 3.9 x 10-7 meters). Note 37-15041 Any evidence of fluorescence shall be cause for recleaning. If recleaning does not reduce the fluorescence, an investigation shall be made to determine whether the fluorescing material is contamination or the basic materials. This level requires precision cleaning methods, but no particle count. 18 Revision 01 A3 Visibly Clean (VC) Levels and Inspection Criteria Three levels of VC requirements are available for the Orbiter payload (cargo) bay, payload canister and payloads during Space Shuttle Orbiter/payload integrated operations at launch and landing sites. VC STANDARD is baseline as referred to in contractual documentation. The VC definition in Table A.1 is applicable to this table with the understanding that incident light levels and inspection distances are specified herein: Table 7 VC Levels and Inspection Criteria for the Orbiter Payload (Cargo) Bay, Payload Canister, and Payloads VC Level Incident Light Level (1) Observation Distance Remarks Standard > 50 foot-candles 5 to 10 feet (2) (3) (5) Sensitive > 50 foot-candles 2 to 4 feet (2) (3) (5) Highly Sensitive > 100 foot-candles 6 to 18 inches (3) (4) Notes 37-15041 (1) One-foot candle (lumens per square foot) is equivalent to 10.76 lumens per square meter. (2) Cleaning is required if the surface in question does not meet VC under the specified incident light and observation distance conditions. (3) Exposed and accessible surfaces only. (4) Initial cleaning is mandatory; Note (2) applies thereafter. (5) Areas of suspected contamination may be examined at distances closer than specified for final verification. 19 Revision 01 Cleanliness Verification Form Program Name: ____________________________________ Date: ______________________________________ Part No.: _____________________________ Hardware Description: ________________________________________________________________ Inspection Area: _____________________________________________________________________ Required Cleanliness Level (as per document): __________________________________________________________________________________ 1. Particulate Standard 2. Sensitive Highly Sensitive Non-volatile Residue _________ ng/cm2 Inspection a. Particulate VC Level Incident Light Level UV Observation Distance Recommended Standard > 50 footcandles Yes No yes Sensitive > 50 footcandles Yes No Yes No 2 to 4 feet Highly Sensitive > 100 footcandles Yes No Yes No 6 to 18 inches Actual Distance Particulates Present No 5 to 10 feet b. NVR 1. Witness Plates _______ ng/cm2 2. Surface Acoustic Wave Microbalance(SAWM) _______ ng/cm2 Inspection Results Particulate 37-15041 Passed Failed 20 Revision 01 Film Present Cleanliness NVR Passed Failed Remarks Inspector: Contamination Control Engineer: NVR Test Form Date: Time Test Location: Sample Number: Part Number Temperature: Humidity: Solvent NVR from C of A Mass of solvent used for test g Area of the part rinsed Cm2 Number of samples sent to outside laboratory: 37-15041 21 Revision 01 Operator Engineer: NVR Results from the Laboratory* NVR Requirements micro-gram/cm2 Level: NVR Measured Passed Failed Verification Signatures Contamination Control Engineer: Date: *Balazs Analytical Services, 46409 Landing Parkway, Fremont CA 94538 Phone: 510-624-4000 37-15041 22 Revision 01 Cleanliness Verification Form Program Name: Date: Part No.: Hardware Description: Inspection Area: Required Cleanliness Level (as per document): 1. Particulate Standard 2. Sensitive Highly Sensitive Non-volatile Residue ng/cm2 Inspection a. Particulate VC Level Incident Light Level UV Standard > 50 footcandles Yes No Yes Sensitive > 50 footcandles Yes No Yes Highly Sensitive > 100 footcandles Yes No Ye s No N6 o t o 1 8 i n c h e 37-15041 23 Obser Actual P Film vation a Present Distan Distance r 5 to 10 feetce t Recom i mende c N d u 2 to 4 feet o l a t e s P r e s e n t Revision 01 s b. NVR 1. Witness Plates ng/cm2 2. Surface Acoustic Wave Microbalance(SAWM) ng/cm2 Inspection Results Particulate Cleanliness NVR Passed Failed Passed Failed Remarks Inspector : 37-15041 Contamination Control Engineer: 24 Revision 01