Principles of quantum mechanics Quantum theory was able to explain the nature of light in terms of packets (or) bundles known as Photons (or) Quanta. Some phenomena like interference, diffraction, polarization etc… are explained on the basis of wave nature of light. However, phenomena like photoelectric effect, Compton effect, Zeeman effect etc … are explained the basis of particle. Thus the wave- particle properties of light is known as dual nature of light. Black body radiation:- It is the one which absorbs 100% radiation incident on it. According to Kirchoff law of radiation a good absorber is also good emitter at high temperature. AS, black body is a perfect absorber it is a perfect emitter also emitting all possible wave lengths from 0 . Planks Quantum theory:- According to Max Planks radiation emitted in the form of Quanta (packet) of energy. The energy of each packet is E h Where h 6.626 1034 J sec = frequency of light Matter waves:- In 1924 Louis de- Broglie suggested that wave – particle duality exhibited by radiation to matter. Therefore particles like electrons, protons , photons, neutrons atoms (or) molecules will have waves associated with them, known as matter waves (or) pilot waves (or) guiding wave (or) de- Broglie waves. de- Broglie proposed that the wave length of matter wave would be related to its momentum by the same same relationship for photons. i.e The particle of mass ‘m ’ travelling with speed ‘v’ the wavelength is give by h h . p mv de- Broglie wavelength:- Let us consider particle with frequency ‘ ’ travelling the velocity of light ‘C’ The velocity of light C= -------------------------------> (1) is wavelength of light According to Planks Quantum theory E h Where h 6.626 1034 J According to Einstein mass energy relation E mc 2 mc 2 h C mc 2 h C h mc p mc h (Wave behavior) p Consider a particle of mass ‘m’ moving with velocity ‘v’ Then the wavelength associated with it h h mv p P is momentum of the particle. de- Broglie wavelength in terms of K.E:- Consider a particle of mass ‘m’ moving with velocity ‘v’ Then the K.E of the particle is given E p2 1 2 m2v 2 mv 2 2m 2m 1 The momentum p Substitute in 2mE h we get. p h This is the de- Broglie wavelength in terms of K.E 2mE de- Broglie wavelength for an electron:- Consider a electron of mass ‘m’ and charge’q’ that is accelerated through a potential difference ‘V’ . Then the K.E of electron is equal to the loss in P.E 1 2 mv qV 2 Substitute in m2v 2 2mqV p mv 2mqV h h we get. de- Broglie wavelength of an electron ------------>(2) p 2mqV Substitute the h, q, and m values in eq(2) We get Wave length of an electron 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.625 1034 Js 2 9.11031 Kg 1.6 1019 C V 12.26 1010 12.26 0 150 A0 m A V V V The above equations give the de-Broglie wavelength of electron. The wavelength of the matter wave associated with electron in motion and confirmed thedeBroglie hypothesis Characteristics of matter wave:Lighter is the particle, grate is wavelength associated with it. Smaller the velocity of particle, grater the wavelength associated with it. When v=0; wave length of matter waves becomes infinity and this indicates that matter waves are to associated with only particles. V ; 0 Particle associated with matter waves. Matter wave wavelength does not depend upon charge of the particle. No single experiment (or) Phenomenon can determine (or) exhibit both wave and particle properties simultaneously. Matter waves propagate with a velocity greater than that of the particle and will have a velocity even greater than that of light. From Planks Quantum theory E h Where h 6.626 1034 J From Einstein mass energy relation E mc 2 mc 2 h Velocity of matter wave . mc 2 h h mc 2 c 2 . mv h V Where ‘V’ is the velocity and is always less than ‘C’ The above analysis indicates that matter waves travels much faster than the particle and hence are called Pilot waves (or) guiding waves. 6. The wave nature of matter introduces an uncertainty in the location of the position of the particle because of wave cannot be said exactly at this point (or) that point. 2 Davisson and Germer Experiment:The first experimental evidence of matter waves was given by two American Physicists, Davisson & Germer in 1927. They also succeed in measuring the de-Broglie wavelength associated with slow electrons. They were studying the reflection (diffraction) of electrons from Nickel target. The Nickel target was subjected to such as heat treatment that the reflection (or) diffraction becomes anomalous. Now the reflected (or diffracted) intensity showed striking maxima & minima. Thus they suspected that electrons are diffracted like X- rays i.e they behave like a wave under certain conditions. Thus the experimental arrangement is as shown in fig. The apparatus consists of an electron gun (G) where electrons are produced and obtained in fine pencil of electron beam of known velocity. The electron gun consists of Tungsten filament (F) heated to dull red so that electrons are emitted due to thermionic emission. Now the electrons are accelerated in electric field of known potential difference (P.D) . The beams of electrons are directed to fall on single crystal of Nickel known as target (T). The electrons acting as the wave it diffracted in different direction. The angular distributions are measured by an electron detector (Farady cylinder) which connected to Galvanometer. The Farady cylinder can move graduated scale (S) between 290 to 900 . The electrons accelerated through a potential 54 Volts hit a Nickel target and scattered electrons distribution showed maximum at an angle of 500 with incident beam. The incident and diffracted beams were making an angle of 650 with incident crystal planes at that inclination of the target. They are rightly concluded that electrons are getting diffracted from Nickel crystal target similar to X- rays and applying Bragg’s equation for diffraction maxima 2d sin n . For different accelerating potentials number of electrons beams collected at different angles. A graph is plotted between galvanometer current (Intensity of diffracted beam) against angle between beam and beam of entering the cylinder. The observations are repeated for different accelerating potentials. The corresponding curves are as shown in fig. 3 1. With increasing of potential, the bump moves upwards. 2. The becomes most prominent in the curve of 54 Volts electrons at 500 3. At higher potentials the bump gradually disappears. According to de-Broglie wavelength associated with electron accelerated at a potential of 54 Volts is 12.26 12.26 1.668 A0 V 54 By Bragg’s condition for known‘d’ value of Nickel crystal d=0.91 A0 at an angle 650 Diffracted beam at 500 . The corresponding angle of incident relative to the family of Bragg’s plane. 1800 500 2 2d sin n 2 0.91sin 650 n=1 1.65A0 Hence this experiment gives good agreement for Bragg’s law and de- Broglie concept of matter wave. Hesigenberg’s uncertainty:We are trying to measure the position of an object with photon of wavelength . The position can be measured best to accuracy about . The uncertainty in the measurement in the position is x . x Assume that momentum of a single photon h P When the photon strikes the object hence the final momentum of the object is uncertain by a quantity. p h h The product of the uncertainties in the position and momentum gives xp It states that product of the uncertainty in the position and momentum of moving particle can never be less than 2 i.e Where h 2 If x & px are the uncertainties in position and momentum xpx 2 or xpx h 4 i.e Both position & momentum of the particle cannot be determined simultaneously and accurately. The other pairs which obeys this uncertainty principle. yp y 2 , E t 2 , z pz 2 , J Where 2 1.05 1034 Applications:1. The uncertainty principle has confirmed the non existence of electrons in nucleious. 2. It has proved stability of atoms & nuclei. 4 Schrodinger wave equation:Let the wave function associated with a moving particle be denoted as (x t) 0e i ( t kx) (1) From quantum theory, we have E or E Similarly from de-Broglie concept p k or k p Substituting &k values in eq(1) We get (x t) 0e (x t) 0e i i ( E t p x) (Et p x) (2) Differentiating (2) with respect to‘t’ i (Et p x) -iE (x t) 0e t (x t) - iE E (x t) (x t) (x t ) i t t Differentiating (2) with respect to ‘x’ (3) i (Et p x) ip (x t) 0e x (x t) -ip (x t ) x Again differentiating with respect to ‘x’ i (Et p x) ip ip 2 (x t) e 0 2 x 2 2 (x t) p 2 (x t ) p 2 (x t) 2 x As total energy of particle is E = K.E + P.E E Multiplying both sides with (x t) p 2 (x t) V (x t) 2m E & p2 Substituting the values of i.e from eq(3) & eq (4) we get 2 (x t) 2 2 x V (x t) (x t) i t 2m 2 2 (x t) i (x t) V (x t) t 2m 2 x p2 V 2m E (x t) (5) 5 2 (x t) x 2 (4) The above equation is called Schrodinger time dependent wave equation in 1D (1 dimension) Eliminating time from the above equation we get Schrodinger time independent wave equation Splitting (x t) into two small functions (x t ) (x) f(t) f d 2 d 2 f (t) f V f dt 2m d 2 x Dividing throughout by f we get i 1d 2 1 d 2 i f (t) V 2m d 2 x f dt This identity is possible when both L.H.S and R.H.S are separately equal to a constant From R.H.S we get 2 1 d 2 V E 2m dx 2 Multiplying both sides with we get 2 d 2 d 2 2m V E (E V) 0 2 2m dx 2 dx 2 (6) eq (6) is Schrodinger time independent wave equation in 1D (Dimension) 2 (xyz) 2m (E V) (xyz) 0 2 (7) eq (7) is Schrodinger time independent wave equation in 3D (Dimension) Where 2 d2 d2 d2 dx 2 dy 2 dz 2 Physical significance of (Born interpretation):According to Max Born the wave function ( ) of a material particle is simply a mathematical function with no physical meaning for itself, whereas square of the wave function (x t) denotes the probability of finding the particle at that point (x) and at that instant (t) As may be real or complex but as probability is always real it is written as p 2 * Where * is complex conjugate of The probability of finding the particle in a small interval of length (dx) is p 6 2 dx As the particle is surely to be found somewhere in the entire space we have p 2 dx 1 A wave function satisfies this condition is said to be normalized to unity. Applications of Schrodinger’s wave equation: Particle in 1 – D box (Infinite Square well potential) Consider a 1-D box of length (a) extending from x=0 to x=a as shown. A particle is moving inside an infinite square well as shown in fig. The potential is infinite everywhere except in the region 0 x a where it is zero The potential specifications are V(x) =0 for 0 x a (Region 2) V(x) = for x 0 ; x a (Region 1 & Region 3) Schrodinger time independent equation is d 2 2m (E V) 0 2 2 dx Inside the box we have V(x) = 0 i.e d 2 2m 2 E 0 dx 2 Where 2 d 2 2 0 2 dx 2mE 2 Solution to eq (1) is of the form (1) (2) (x) Asin x Bcos x Where A, B are constants 7 (3) The boundary conditions are At x= 0 ; =0 At x=a; = 0 always Applying first boundary condition to eq(3) (x = 0 ; =0) We get 0 Asin 00 B cos 00 B=0 (always) because (cos 00 0 1) Solution becomes (x) Asin x (4) Applying 2nd boundary condition to eq (4) (X = a; = 0) We get 0 Asin x As A 0 sin a 0 a n Eq(4) becomes where n = 1,2,3,……. n 0 n a (x) Asin n x a (5) This is the general solution for particle in a box 2 We have n 2 2 2mE 2 2 a The eign values are En n2 h2 8ma 2 1. Particle cannot have zero energy. The minimum energy for particle is E1 h2 8ma 2 Which is called zero point energy? 2. Particle in a box energy levels are quantized as E1 8 h2 E2 =4E1 E3 = 9E1 8ma 2 Normalized wave function:As particle is surely to be found somewhere inside the box always We have a n x A2 sin 2 dx 1 0 a a dx 1 2 0 a n x A2 sin 2 dx 1 0 a A 2 a 1 cos 2 n x a dx 1 2 Evaluate the above integral we get A2 Normalized wave functions are 2 2 A a a n (x) 2 n x sin a a From above it can be seen that in quantum mechanical picture the particle 1. Can have only certain discrete energies as given by E n n2 h2 with n = 1,2,3,4, - - - - - This indicates that the energies 8ma 2 levels are quantized. (Fig. 1) 2. Different regions inside the well have different probabilities of containing the particle, and this probability changes with particle energy. (Fig.3) 3. When the particle is in lowest energy level i.e. n=1, maximum probability is at center of the well, i.e. at x = a/2 and the minimum at, x=0 and x= a. For second energy level n=2, maximum probability is x = a/4 and also at x =3a/4. The minimum probability is at x = 0, x=a/2 and X=a 4. In classical picture, the particle can have any amount of energy and all points inside the well have same probability of containing the particle at all energies. 9 Extension to three dimensions:The potential V(x y z ) in the box as V x y z 0 x y z X (x) Y(y) Z(z) 0 x a , 0 y b , 0 z c The time independent Schrodinger equation is d 2 d 2 d 2 2mE 2 2 E V x y z 0 dy 2 dz 2 dx The wave function can be written as Reduced 1-D equation d 2Y d2X d 2Z 2 2 x 0 32 z 0 y 0 1 2 2 2 2 dx dz dy Where 1 , 2 , 3 are constants obeying the equation 12 2 2 32 2mE 2 Proceeding in the similar manner as 1-D box X (x) A1sin n1 x a Y(y) A 2sin n2 y n 2 2 b b n2 =1,2,3 ………… Z(z) A 3sin n3 z c n3 = 1,2,3 …………. 2 3 2 1 2 2 En1n2 n3 1 3 2mE 2 2 n1 a n3 c n1 =1,2,3 ………. n12 n2 2 n32 2 2 2 b c a 2 n12 n2 2 n32 2 2 2m a 2 b c 2 The function is given by n1n2 n3 A1 A2 A3 sin According to Normalized condition A1 A2 A3 nn n 1 2 3 nz n1 x ny sin 2 sin 3 a b c 8 abc nz nx ny 8 sin 1 sin 2 sin 3 abc a b c 10 For Cubic potential a=b=c En1n2 n3 nn n 1 2 3 2 2 2ma 2 n 2 1 n2 2 n32 nz nx ny 8 sin 1 sin 2 sin 3 3 a a a a Pb) calculate the first three allowed energy levels from electron in 1- D box of length 10 A0 . En Sol: n2 h2 n2 (6.625 1034 )2 Joul 8ma 2 8 9.11031 (10 1010 ) 2 ` n 1 n 2 (6.625 1034 ) 2 0.37 n 2 eV 31 10 2 8 9.110 (10 10 ) E1 0.37eV n 2 E2 0.37 4 1.48eV ` n3 E3 0.37 9 3.33eV 11