Designing an assignment sequence?1 NOTE TO SELF: I want to ADD SOMETHING about making sure an assignment identifies focal skills/concepts and whether the instructor will attend to some things in evaluation and not others (i.e. the high order stuff—thesis, argument, and support; the middle order stuff—organization, transitions, framing; and lower order stuff—mechanics, style, formatting) Think about your assignment sequence as a logical progression. Assignment sequences may follow one or more logical progressions. The later assignments would typically require more sophistication and independent work of the student, building upon skills and confidence earned with the earlier assignments. The instructor should consider, when devising a sequence, these progressions2: Minimal research required substantial research required3 Instructor provides much of the structure (more scaffolding) Instructor provides minimal structure (more studentdriven) Writing for peers, class mates writing for scholars in a particular field Aiming to inform to analyze to persuade Increasing complexity: writing a narrative based upon observation writing an essay that contributes to a ongoing scholarly conversation What are the typical characteristics of sequences in WRTG 100 and WRTG 101? How are they similar? How are they different? WRTG 100 WRTG 101 The assignment sequences (if not the individual assignments) in both WRTG 100 and 101 should: help students to see the opportunities for transfer (where and how they may use what they’ve learned in College Writing in their other classes and beyond). build upon critical reading skills that grow from the class’s reading and discussion of the course texts require sophistication…challenge students to move beyond false dualities and simplistic argumentation of (some) high school writing The assignment sequence in WRTG 100 should help students to see essay writing as a process begin to establish themselves as critical thinkers distinguish between observation and argument think in terms of thesis, of intellectual contribution see themselves as capable of joining scholarly conversations identify and interact with scholarly sources and quality popular sources The assignment sequence in WRTG 101 should challenge students to understand an assignment clearly from the beginning and then set in motion the process learned in WRTG 100 locate discussions that are scholarly in scope and intellectual value see the opportunities to contribute to those discussions reach for sophistication in choices of topic, approach, and research develop knowledge of the course content/theme through the assignment—in other words, the assignment sequence should foster academic inquiry into the course theme See the CWP Faculty Handbook for ….. However, there is precedent also for putting the most time-consuming and sophisticated assignment in the middle of the semester (for example, to allow students plenty of time to complete that most important assignment, and to allow for some levity and/or play in the final assignment) 3 These progressions were inspired by “Models and Criteria for Sequencing Writing Assignments” (LINK) 1 2 Examples This table presents a broad overview of possible sequences. A sequence of three assignments per class is typical but certainly not required. Course WRTG 100 WRTG 101 Sample A4 1. 2. 1st Essay assignment What is it? A narrative that requires some reflection and/or analysis of an issue or situation: e.g. “write about a time when you’ve had to confront/respond to something that makes many people your age uncomfortable.” -orA research-based response to an easily observed (but perhaps under-scrutinized) phenomenon: e.g. “investigate, analyze, and write about the acronym “YOLO” What is the rationale? A ‘hit the ground running’ assignment, perhaps with some research required. It allows students to begin writing within first few class meetings, allows the instructor to focus heavily on teaching writing as a process, and on thesis building, organization, and audience awareness. What is it? 2nd Essay Assignment What is it? A Textual Synthesis that tasks students with bringing together multiple texts to create and join a conversation about the course theme or a field of study (e.g. fantasy/science fiction, political punditry, food, or the business of sports). Students collect published works that reflect both the cutting edge and the historical progression of the field of study, and then they develop a claim of their own about the intersections of the texts. What is the rationale? This assignment “launch[es] the semester by immersing students in one of them ore conceptual yet complicated academic discussions about the course theme. It require[s] them to analyze individual texts, synthesize them carefully, and find a place among them, intellectually. The essay itself [draws] upon their fall skills of building an argument-driven essay and integrating and 3. engaging with sources.” What is it? An Annotated Bibliography and Proposal for the 3rd assignment of the semester. Students settle upon topics that suit the course theme, devise research questions, collect and evaluate sources (perhaps from a prescribed list of source types), and then propose a direction and working thesis. What is the rationale? What is the rationale? Building upon the class’s instruction in information literacy, students should be ready to investigate complex and interesting topics. An assignment like this encourages exploration and the seeking of opportunities to contribute to those topics (instead of fasttracking the regurgitation of information). 3rd Essay Assignment 4. What is it? A Feature-Style Researched Essay of 8-12 pages. This would be the fruition of the Annotated Bibliography and Proposal. The essay would engage a topic and contribute to it; it would make the topic matter to readers and offer a solution, resolution, or fresh point of view. What is the rationale? 4 The required length and scope of this essay will challenge students to sustain an argument and support it through reason and interaction with published sources. The feature style component can underscore the intellectual value of “popular” writing and dash the common assumption that academic essays must be dull and inaccessible. This progression is adapted ffrom Prof. Charles Cox What is it? What is the rationale? WRTG 101 Sample B -------From Previous draft 1. Field-Research Essay Many course themes have field-research potential (polls, surveys, observation, interviews, etc.). This first assignment could get students out ‘in the field’ to gather some primary data, interpret it, use it Style to make an argument. 2. Researchedand Feature Essay The culminating and cumulative essay assignment of the semester (perhaps even of the 2-semester sequence). Naturally, it would be theme-inspired. The following “process assignments” would give you the opportunity to reinforce the importance of the scholarly moves that you’ve been teaching since the beginning of 100. Curiosity Papers …requiring students to propose 3 possible topic ideas, identifying for each idea exigencies and possibilities for the student to contribute. Literature Review Investigating scholarship on the topic ideas…finding connections, disagreements, and opportunities for contribution. Annotated Bibliography and Proposal …finally narrowing to one topic and working thesis…proposing an approach and methodology …presenting and assessing the value and viability of set of sources (sources that meet specified criteria meant to mandate breadth)