Supporting Information for Combine Umbrella Sampling with Integrated Tempering Method for Efficient and Accurate Calculation of Free Energy Changes of Complex Energy Surface Mingjun Yang,1 Lijiang Yang,2 Yiqin Gao,2 and Hao Hu1,a) 1 Department of Chemistry, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong, China 2 College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China a) To whom correspondence should be addressed: haohu@hku.hk 1 Table SI. Window locations (ω, in degree) and corresponding force constants (k_f, in kcal/mol/rad2) in US simulations of Ace-Nme systema For ω: ω 0 9 18 27 36 45 54 63 72 k_f 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 ω 81 90 94 96 99 102 104 106 108 k_f 70 70 70 140 90 70 70 70 160 ω 110 112 117 126 135 144 153 162 171 k_f 70 160 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 ω 180 -9 -18 -27 -36 -45 -54 -63 -72 k_f 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 ω -81 -90 -94 -96 -99 -102 -104 -106 -108 k_f 70 120 160 120 160 120 160 120 120 ω -110 -112 -117 -126 -135 -144 -153 -162 -171 k_f 120 120 120 70 70 70 70 70 70 ω 99 108 117 126 135 144 153 162 171 k_f 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 ω -99 -108 -117 -126 -135 -144 -153 -162 k_f 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 ω 180 k_f 90 For η: -171 a The same set of window locations and force constants along ω were used in 1-D US, 1-D ITSUS, and 2-D US simulations 2 Figure S1. PMF profile for the rotation of dihedral C1-C2-C3-C4 in butane. The error bars were computed from eight MD trajectories of 32 ns each. For US and ITS-US, 40 evenly distributed sampling windows were used along the dihedral angle C1-C2-C3-C4 with a uniform force constant of 45.0 kcal/mol/rad2 for all windows. For ITS, 60 different temperatures in the range of 273 ~ 450 K were employed. The same set of optimized nk values were used in both ITS and ITS-US production simulations. 3 Figure S2. PMF computed from 150ps 1-D ITS-US simulations with different nk values. (A) 1-D PMF along ω of Ace-Nme system. Black: reference from 2-D US simulations; red: 1-D ITS-US with nk values optimized using the original potential; green, 1-D ITS-US with nk values optimized using the original potential with a harmonic restraint at =0; blue, 1-D ITS-US with nk values optimized using the original potential with a harmonic restraint at =45; yellow, 1-D ITS-US with nk values optimized using the original potential with a harmonic restraint at =90; purple, 1-D ITS-US with nk values optimized for each umbrella window using the biased 4 potential. The 2-D PMF maps along ω and were generated from 1-D ITS-US simulations with nk values optimized using (B) the original potential; (C) the original potential with a harmonic restraint at =0; (D) the original potential with a harmonic restraint at =45; (E) the original potential with a harmonic restraint at =90; (F) corresponding biased potential for each window. Note for clarity, the Y-axis is defined as in 2-D PMF maps. =- when >0 and =+ when <0. 5 Figure S3. PMF along ω of Ace-Nme system. The total 1500 ps 1-D ITS-US simulations at each window were evenly divided into ten 150 ps segments and the PMF was calculated for each segment. 6 Figure S4. Comparison of sampling efficiency between standalone ITS and ITS-US simulations of Ace-Nme system. All these simulations were carried out using CHARMM force field. The simulation length for 2-D US and 1-D ITS-US was 600 ps per window. The simulation length for standalone ITS was 8 × 96 ns. All simulation parameters were the same to these used in SCCDFTB simulations. The error bar was computed from eight independent ITS simulations and the PMF of ITS was computed from the average probability distribution. 7 Figure S5. Comparison of sampling efficiency between standalone ITS and ITS-US simulations of Ace-Nme system. All these simulations were carried out using CHARMM force field. (a) 2-D PMF maps from 2-D US simulations. (b) 2-D PMF maps from 8 × 96 ns ITS simulations. (c) 2D PMF maps from 1-D ITS-US simulations. Note for clarity, the Y-axis is defined as in 2-D PMF maps. =- when >0 and =+ when <0. The unit for both axes is degree. 8