Supplementary information for “Magneto-optical fingerprints of distinct graphene multilayers using the giant infrared Kerr effect” Chase T. Ellis1, Andreas V. Stier1, Myoung-Hwan Kim1, Joseph G. Tischler2, Evan R. Glaser2, Rachael L. Myers-Ward2, Joseph L. Tedesco2,3, Charles R. Eddy, Jr 2, D. Kurt Gaskill2, and John Cerne1* 1 Department of Physics, University at Buffalo, SUNY, Buffalo, New York, USA. 2 Electronics Science & Technology Division Code 6800, U.S. Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC, USA. 3 American Society for Engineering Education, 1818 N Street NW, Washington, DC, USA *Jcerne@buffalo.edu. Supporting Note 1: Monolayer and multilayer 1/B periodicity For monolayer graphene LL energies are defined by Emono, L sign( L)vF 2e | LB | , (S1) where, v F is the Fermi velocity, L is the Landau level (LL) index, and B is the magnetic field strength. Thus, the interband cyclotron resonance (CR) condition yields E ph E , 1 E 1 E vF 2e BT , 1 , (S2) where BT , is the magnetic field strength corresponding to the 1 CR transition. Rearranging equation S2 we find v 2e 1 F BT , E ph 2 1 , 2 (S3) Expanding the second parenthetic term in equation S3 we find v 2e 1 F BT , E ph 2 2 1 2 2 , (S4) From equation (S4) it is clear that 1 / BT , is not exactly a linear function of . However, upon closer examination of the first and second derivatives of equation (S4) it can be shown that 1 / BT , is approximately a linear function of for interband transitions where 1 . Figure S1 shows the nearly linear dependence (Fig. S1a) and nearly constant first derivative (Fig. S1b) of 1 BT , versus (equation S4) for features at 1 / BT , 1 . The approximately periodic nature of interband CRs in monolayer graphene can be exploited via Fourier analysis. Similar treatment of the bilayer graphene CR condition yields similar results; shown in Figure S1c-d. However, due to the greater complexity of 1 BT , for bilayer graphene1 these calculations must be done numerically. From the E ph dependence of the 1 B -frequency we extract fundamental band parameters. This can be shown analytically for monolayer graphene. For CR transitions that are nearly periodic versus 1 B (i.e., 1 ) equation (S4) becomes 2 v 2e 1 F BT , E ph 4 1 , (S5) subsequently, this reveals the relationship between the 1 B -period (and frequency f ) and E ph 1 BT , 1 2 vF 2e E ph 1 1 BT , f mono (4) . (S6) Using the dependence of f on the photon energy E ph , we can determine vF . The band parameters of multilayer graphene can also be determined in this manner. However, the more complicated LL energies of multilayer graphene do not yield analytical results for the band parameters that must be solved for numerically. 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.5 0.05 d b 3.3 monolayer graphene d(1/BT)/dn 3.0 d(1/BT,)/dn non-linear linear 1.0 bilayer graphene 0.30 1/BT (1/T) 1.5 c monolayer graphene 2.0 non-linear linear 1/BT, (1/T) a 0.5 0.4 3.34 3.32 3.30 3.28 3.26 bilayer graphene 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0.3 0 1 2 3 4 5 Landau level index Figure S1: Linear behavior for 1 / BT , versus 0 1 2 3 4 5 Landau level index . (a) The nearly linear dependence of 1 / BT , versus results in a nearly constant first derivative for monolayer graphene, shown in (b). Similar behavior is found for (c,d) bilayer graphene. Supporting Note 2: Association of 2 f AB , bi and f ABC , tri FTKS components. As discussed in the main text (and shown in Fig. S2a), for E ph 114.5 meV , the FTKS peak at f 36.3 T is consistent with expectations for the second harmonic AB bilayer ( 2 f AB , bi ) and ABC trilayer ( f ABC , tri ) frequency components. As seen in Fig. S2b, at E ph 133.8 meV the two components separate, which is completely predicted by theory2, as shown in Fig. S2c. For E ph 117 meV the two components are separated in the 1 B -frequency space; however, at E ph 117 meV the two components are coincident. Due to the broadening of the two components, they are indistinguishable at E ph 114.5 meV . The E ph dependence of the 2 f AB , bi and f ABC , tri enables us to correctly identify the features. SiC graphene Eph=133.8 meV fABC,tri 2fAB,bi magnetic frequency (T) (arb.) 0 1 2f 2 - 1 44 fABC,tri 2f AB,bi (arb.) b c SiC graphene Eph=114.5 meV 3 FT Re{qKerr} FT Re{Kerr} a i f ABC,tr 40 36 32 0 10 20 30 40 1/B-magnetic frequency (T) 50 60 100 110 120 130 photon energy (meV) Figure S2: (a) SiC graphene FTKS spectrum measured at E ph 114.5 meV , showing the 2 f AB , bi and f ABC , tri components, which occur at the same 1 B -frequency. (b) FTKS measurement at E ph 133.8 meV , showing the splitting of the two frequency components, as expected from theory shown panel c. (c) Calculated1,2 f ABC ,tri and 2 f AB , bi versus E ph . Gray shading denotes measured photon energy range. Theory shows these two frequency components coinciding at E ph 117 meV and separating away from this energy, as observed in panels a and b. Insets show the theoretical separation of the two peaks. Supporting Note 3: Theoretical overestimation of Re[ K ] for monolayer graphene. In this work we detect changes in the polarization of light reflected by the sample using photoelastic modulation (PEM) and lockin amplification techniques. As outlined by Ref. 3, the Kerr rotation ( Re[ K ] ) is proportional detected lockin signal ( I 2 ), referenced to the second harmonic ( 2 ) of the PEM driving frequency ( ). The relationship between Re[ K ] and I 2 is given by Re[ K ] CRe I 2 I0 R where CRe is a constant related to the measurement system, I 0 is the intensity of the light incident upon the sample, and R is the reflectance of the sample. For a heterogeneous sample, such as those discussed in the main text, the total rotation ( Re[ K ,Total ] ) is related to the intensity of light reflecting from each section of the sample. For example, considering a heterogeneous sample with two regions containing two distinct types of multilayer graphene (A and B), the total 2 signal I 2 ,Total measured by the lockin is I 2 ,Total Re[ K , A ] f A I 0 RA f I R Re[ K , B ] B 0 B , CRe CRe (S7) where f A and f B are the fractional areas corresponding to the two types of graphene that are being probed and RA and RB represents the reflectances of the individual graphene regions. Unfortunately, our measurement system cannot separate the light reflected by the two regions; thus, we are forced to analyze the result using the total measured intensity I mea. f A I 0 RA f B I 0 RB Re[ K ,Total ] CRe I 2 ,Total I mea. Re[ K , A ] f A RA f B RB . Re[ K , B ] f A RA f B RB f A RA f B RB (S8) For this situation, equation (S8) reveals that the heterogeneous nature of sample will yield errors in the determination of the true magnitude of Kerr features, with a scaling error for the 1 magnitude of Kerr features associated with layer A given by f A RA f B RB 1 . This is the most probable reason for the difference between the measured and theoretical magnitudes of the monolayer Kerr angle discussed in the text. Supporting Note 4: Fermi Energy limits for monolayer and bilayer graphene and their relationship to the photon energy for electron-hole band symmetry For electron-hole symmetric bands the condition for observing a Kerr response due to an interband LL transition at a particular photon energy is given by E < E F < E 1 . This condition ensures that 1 transitions are Pauli blocked while 1 are allowed. Since the two equal-energy transitions are activated by opposite handedness of circularly polarized light, meeting this condition will create an imbalance between and . This imbalance yields CR Kerr features corresponding to interband LL transitions since the Kerr angle is proportional to the difference between and . Using the interband CR condition for monolayer graphene (equation S2), we solve for the B -value where the CRs occur: BT , E ph vF 2e 2 1 1 2 . (S9) Evaluating the LL energy E 1 at BT , yields the upper Kerr activation Fermi energy limit EF ,max E 1 ( BT . ) E ph 1 1 . (S10) Graphene layers with EF EF ,max have both 1 and 1 LL transitions Pauli blocked, yielding no Kerr angle response, as well as no photon absorption. Similarly, the lower limit is given by EF ,min E ( BT , ) E ph . 1 (S11) For layers with EF EF ,min both degenerate transitions are allowed equally; thus, chiral symmetry is not broken, and no Kerr angle response is observed, despite photon absorption. However, for EF ,min EF EF ,max chiral symmetry is broken by Pauli blocked 1 transitions. As increases the difference between EF ,max and EF ,min decreases; therefore to observe LL transitions in the Kerr spectrum with large transition index , the Fermi energy must lie between the two limits for large values of (gray shaded region in Fig. S3a). For very large the upper and lower limits approach the value lim E 1 ( BT , ) lim E ( BT , ) E ph 2 , (S10) which is depicted in Fig. S3b. This makes EF E ph / 2 the ideal Fermi energy, which yields the most LL transition Kerr features in a magnetic field sweep. The relationship between the Fermi energy limits and photon energy shows that CR Kerr features can be turned on and off in three ways: 1) Tuning the Fermi energy away from the ideal value E ph / 2 , 2) tuning the photon energy away from 2 EF . and 3) tuning B or E ph away from CR. As shown in Fig. S3b, this behavior is preserved for bilayer graphene, a) b) L=1 L=2 EF,max Energy EF,min L=0 B Fermi Energy Limits (meV) 100 Eph=170 meV 90 EF=85 meV 80 ABC trilayer EF,max AB bilayer EF,max 70 mono EF,max mono EF,min AB bilayer EF,min 60 ABC trilayer EF,min 50 EF=50 meV Eph=100 meV 40 L=-2 L=-1 0 5 10 15 LL transition index 20 Figure S3: (a) Schematic of band symmetric monolayer graphene LL structure and Fermi energy limits that activate CR Kerr features. (b) Expected Fermi energy limits EF ,max and EF ,min for both monolayer and bilayer graphene at two different probe photon energies (upper black/red symbols E ph ,1 =170 meV, lower black/red symbols E ph ,2 =100 meV). Both upper and lower limits converge on E ph / 2 as 1 2 3 increases. Koshino, M. & Ando, T. Magneto-optical properties of multilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. B 77, 115313 (2008). Yuan, S., Roldán, R. & Katsnelson, M. I. Landau level spectrum of ABA-and ABCstacked trilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. B 84, 125455 (2011). Kim, M. H. et al. Determination of the infrared complex magnetoconductivity tensor in itinerant ferromagnets from Faraday and Kerr measurements. Phys. Rev. B 75, 214416 (2007).