s PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION Final PART 1: COURSE SUMMARY INFORMATION Course summary Final award BA (hons) Applied Psychology and Sociology Intermediate award Dip HE Applied Psychology and Sociology Cert HE Applied Psychology and Sociology Course status Validated Awarding body University of Brighton Faculty Health School School of Applied Social Science Location of study/ campus Falmer Partner institution(s) Name of institution Host department Course status 1. SELECT 2. 3. Admissions Admissions agency UCAS Entry requirements UCAS Tariff: 300 points. Key skills will count towards the tariff score. General Studies will count towards the tariff score. IB: 32 points QAA accredited Access course: acceptable GCSE (minimum grade C): at least 3 subjects including English language and mathematics or a science. Foundation Degree/ HND/ HNC: dependent on award normally direct entry to year 2 by credit accreditation transfer. Other: Mature applicants without the above qualifications should be able to show an ability to benefit from the course by, for example, work or professional experience. All mature applicants are considered on an individual basis. Include any progression opportunities into the course. Requirement for applicants for whom English is not a first language: IELTS (English proficiency): 6.0 overall, 6 in writing. Start date (mmm-yy) Sep-11 Normally September Mode of study Mode of study Duration of study (standard) Maximum registration period Full-time 3 years 6 years Part-time Other: 8 years Other: 8 years Page 1 of 11 Sandwich Select Select Distance Select Select Course codes/categories UCAS code CL83 Contacts Course Leader (or Course Development Leader) Orly Klein (Liz Cunningham Sep 2011-April 2012) Admissions Tutor Nichola Khan Examination and Assessment Name Place of work Date tenure expires External Examiner(s) Dr Rose Capdevila and Julie ScottJones OU 31/08/12 Examination Board(s) (AEB/CEB) SASS UG Programme AEB SASS UG Programme CEB Approval and review Approval date 20041 Validation Feb Programme Specification Republished Sept 10 with module changes, for cohorts starting Sept 09 onwards Republished Oct 11 with no changes3 Review date Feb 20082 Sept 20124 5 Professional, Statutory and Regulatory Body 1 (if applicable): Professional, Statutory and Regulatory Body 2 (if applicable): Professional, Statutory and Regulatory Body 3 (if applicable): 1 Date of original validation. Date of most recent periodic review (normally academic year of validation + 5 years). 3 Month and year this version of the programme specification was approved (normally September). 4 Date programme specification will be reviewed (normally approval date + 1 year). If programme specification is applicable to a particular cohort, please state here. 5 Date of most recent review by accrediting/ approving external body. 2 Page 2 of 11 PART 2: COURSE DETAILS AIMS AND LEARNING OUTCOMES Aims The aims of the course are: 1. To provide a programme of study in Applied Psychology and Sociology to Honours degree level through which students can develop their analytical and critical capacities and apply these to their increasing knowledge and understanding of sociology and applied psychology. 2. To equip students with a knowledge of psychological perspectives and research to enable them to engage critically in debates about individual behaviour and social phenomena especially regarding factors such as class, race, gender and culture. 3. To enable critical awareness of sociological issues of social structure, conflict and social divisions, and social change, in both historical and contemporary contexts. 4. To enable students to gain skills in social research and have a practical understanding of the nature and appropriate use of research strategies and methods in gaining psychological and sociological knowledge. 5. To enable students to acquire a firm educational foundation for subsequent employment through the development of vocationally relevant transferable skills in fields relating especially to sociology and psychology (e.g. social research, health services, and a wider range of contexts working with individuals and groups such as counselling, victim support). To enable students to develop a comprehensive multi-disciplinary understanding of the relationship between individuals, groups, institutions and social structures by critically evaluating the influence of individual and social factors on issues such as personality development, health related behaviour; social and anti-social behaviour and the effectiveness of sociological and psychological theories and interventions in a range of settings. Learning outcomes The outcomes of the main award provide information about how the primary aims are demonstrated by students following the course. These are mapped to external reference points where appropriate 6. Knowledge and theory 6 have knowledge of traditional and contemporary psychological and sociological theories, concepts and methods as they have developed within the context of general social science; have knowledge of the role of cultural processes in psychological and sociological analysis (SS113, SS107, SS130, SS123, SS122, SS103, SS252, SS217, SS253, SS238, SS245, SS246, SS344, SS365, SS302, SS348, SS378, SS329); have critical understanding of the impact of contemporary social change on individuals, groups, institutions and understand the relationship between the individual and the social world from both psychological and sociological perspectives (SS113, SS107, SS130, SS123, SS122, SS103, SS252, SS217, SS253, SS238, SS245, SS246, SS344, SS365, SS302, SS348, SS378, SS329) have knowledge of social conflict, divisions and inequalities, such as ‘race’, ethnicity, gender, sexuality, class, health, with particular reference to contemporary issues in sociology and psychology (SS113, SS107, SS130, SS123, SS122, SS103, Please refer to Course Development and Review Handbook or QAA website for details. Page 3 of 11 SS252, SS217, SS253, SS238, SS245, SS246, SS344, SS365, SS302, SS348, SS378, SS329); Skills have knowledge of social science methodology, key sources of data and research methods for collecting and analysing quantitative and qualitative data (SS103, SS113, SS238, SS344, SS329). of the scientific underpinnings of psychology as a discipline, its historical origins, development and limitations (SS113, SS123, SS252, SS302, SS348, SS246, SS378) of sociological concepts, theories, and methodologies in explaining social structure, and social and cultural change (SS107, SS122, SS130, SS217, SS253, SS344, SS365); of intellectual traditions, and key theoretical perspectives such as functionalism, conflict theories, feminism, anti-racism and post-modern perspectives (SS113, SS107, SS130, SS123, SS122, SS103, SS252, SS217, SS253, SS238, SS245, SS246, SS344, SS365, SS302, SS348, SS378, SS329) of theoretical perspectives and contemporary debates in sociology and applied psychology and their application to a range of contemporary social issues and problems (SS113, SS107, SS130, SS123, SS122, SS103, SS252, SS217, SS253, SS238, SS245, SS246, SS344, SS365, SS302, SS348, SS378, SS329, SS395) of the range of individual and social processes underpinning social divisions, cultural diversity, social inequalities and power relationships and how they can be used in sociological and psychological research (SS113, SS107, SS130, SS123, SS122, SS103, SS252, SS217, SS253, SS238, SS245, SS246, SS344, SS365, SS302, SS348, SS378, SS329). be able to critically engage in debates about concepts, theories, social problems and issues by reference to contrasting perspectives and paradigms from within both psychology and sociology (SS113, SS107, SS130, SS123, SS122, SS103, SS252, SS217, SS253, SS238, SS245, SS246, SS344, SS365, SS302, SS348, SS378, SS329) be able to critically assess the strengths and weaknesses of a range of psychological and sociological theories (SS113, SS107, SS123, SS122, SS252, SS217, SS253, SS245, SS246, SS344, SS365, SS302, SS348, SS378, SS329) be able to integrate ideas and findings from across the two disciplines and recognise the appropriateness of distinctive approaches to explain relevant issues (SS130, SS238, SS245, SS365, SS378, SS329); Includes intellectual skills (i.e. generic skills relating to academic study, problem solving, evaluation, research etc.) and professional/ practical skills. be able to formulate theoretically-informed questions and investigate these by seeking out and using relevant data, research publications and other sources, show clear presentation of the findings, and use reasoned argument to draw comprehensive conclusions (SS103, SS238, SS329); be able to show awareness of ethical principles in relation to personal study, particularly the dissertation (SS329). Page 4 of 11 Professional / practical skills QAA subject benchmark statement (where applicable)7 be able to read and interpret complex texts closely, critically and creatively (all modules, but especially SS113 and SS246) be able to communicate ideas and arguments effectively, both verbally and in writing (all modules but especially SS302, SS329). be able to learn and study independently, to self-manage work with minimal supervision, and to reflect on academic work (all modules but especially SS238, SS329). be able to work effectively in organisations, including: self-motivation; integrity; interpersonal and group working skills (all modules, but especially SS251, SS238, SS302, SS392 ). be able to use information technology to word-process, display data in graphs and diagrams, analyse quantitative and/or qualitative data, communicate via email, obtain information from the internet and conduct searches of electronic databases (all modules but especially SS124, SS103, SS238) QAA Developmental Engagement, 2003 External Examiners’ Reports. The learning outcomes of the course have been formulated with reference to Psychology and Sociology benchmark statements. PROFESSIONAL, STATUTORY AND REGULATORY BODIES (where applicable) Where a course is accredited by a PSRB, full details of how the course meets external requirements, and what students are required to undertake, are included. LEARNING AND TEACHING Learning and teaching methods This section sets out the primary learning and teaching methods, including total learning hours and any specific requirements in terms of practical/ clinical-based learning. The indicative list of learning and teaching methods includes information on the proportion of the course delivered by each method and details where a particular method relates to a particular element of the course. Each 20 credit module is designed to encompass 200 hours of student learning activity. The programme is designed to create independent learners who will use the opportunities afforded by the degree to analyse their own learning needs. At level 4 the creation of independent learners is fostered by coordinated academic skills development programme merged into Level 4 modules. The development of different skills in different modules are specified in the relevant module outlines. An Academic Skills Coordinator will coordinate this academic skills development effort across Level 4 modules. Thereafter, skills development and the development of independent learners continues as a normal part of Level 5 and 6 modules. IT skills are verified and developed in a zero–credit module giving an induction into the University’s systems, and a test of IT competences 7 Please refer to the QAA website for details. Page 5 of 11 The personal tutoring system supports students in their learning at Level 4, semester 1 through a programme of regular, purposeful small group meetings with personal tutors. This will be coordinated by a Personal Tutoring Coordinator. The typical pattern of learning and teaching on each module is a weekly lecture plus one or two additional hours of contact time each week. At Level 4 all modules have a total of three hours contact. At levels 5 and 6 this contact typically involves two or three hours per module. Certain modules (e.g. SS245 and SS251) have contact every two or three weeks, rather than weekly. The Dissertation at Level 6 begins with regular contact during the first semester, but, during the second semester, reduces to a total of two hours of individual tutorials per student. The general intention is to develop independence in learning by working of students’ skills during Level 4, and thereafter, encouraging them to manage their time effectively by reducing contact in a variety of ways. The types of non-lecture contact vary between modules. Some modules have weekly seminar or workshop groups of 20-25 students in which students undertake activities such as small group work or individual or group presentations. Other modules have one large workshop attended by all students taking the module in which students participate in small group activities, usually with several members of staff present. To ensure that all students experience small group teaching throughout their degree, at level 5 and 6 there are compulsory modules in which students are taught in groups of between 10 and 15 students. In addition, in semester 1 at Level 4 students are given membership of ‘Learning Groups’. These are small self-selected groups of students (up to five) who are encouraged to work together outside formal contact time. Each semester 1 Level 4 module gives Learning groups weekly, non–assessed assignments to complete. The Groups report back on these assignments, usually at their weekly seminars / workshops. Learning and teaching is accorded a high priority within the School. A learning and teaching co-ordinator supports the work of staff in this area and the School has an Educational Development Research Group that initiates and manages research into learning, teaching and related issues within the School to feed back to SASS tutors, the rest of the University, and the wider educational community. Regular undergraduate teachers meetings facilitate the discussion of learning and teaching issues. Links have been established with the Subject Centres for Social Policy and Social Work and for Sociology, Anthropology, Criminology, Psychology and Politics. The primary teaching and learning methods, other than guided independent study, include lectures, seminars, workshops and group tutorials. ASSESSMENT Assessment methods This section sets out the summative assessment methods on the course and includes details on where to find further information on the criteria used in assessing coursework. It also provides an assessment matrix which reflects the variety of modes of assessment, and the volume of assessment in the course. Coursework essays: demonstration of analytical ability and written communication skills. Examinations (including seen, open book and unseen examinations): demonstration of knowledge, understanding and ability to apply knowledge. Reports and Projects: demonstration of evaluation skills, project management and written communication skills. Literature Reviews (books and articles): the ability to summarise, contextualise and criticise scholarship and research findings. Page 6 of 11 Dissertation: demonstration of ability to develop a sustained argument and to manage work independently. Take-away examinations: demonstration of ability to apply knowledge when working to a deadline. Seminar presentations: demonstration of knowledge, understanding and verbal communication and presentation skills. Other methods (including portfolios, group exercises, presentation notes). A number of transferable skills, such as IT, problem-solving and self-motivation, are embedded within the primary modes of delivery of learning and are not necessarily separately assessed. However, satisfactory achievement of the learning outcomes requires that such skills are developed to an appropriate level. Assessment criteria Below 40% (equivalent to a fail): Does not address the question posed. Misses the point of the question. Lack of structure/organisation. Significant factual errors. Reliance on too narrow a range of sources. Poor or non-existent referencing and bibliography. 40%-49% (equivalent to Third Class Honours) Records and presents at acceptable levels of accuracy and clarity material which addresses the question posed; some reference to relevant reading; an ability to identify issues pertinent to the question. 50%-59% (equivalent to Lower Second Class Honours) In addition to the above, work which shows: evidence that the student can draw selectively from literature to support arguments with authority; an ability to present a coherent and developing discussion; evidence of an understanding of conceptual and theoretical material being employed; a well presented and adequately referenced assignment. 60%-69% (equivalent to Upper Second Class Honours) As above, but with clear evidence of perception and insight in the identification and analysis of issues; an ability to handle evidence and literature with relevance and imagination; thorough referencing of material drawn upon; a clear independence of view in presentation, stance and analysis; a sound understanding of theoretical material and its relevance to matters under discussion. 70%-84% (equivalent to First Class Honours) As above, but with perceptive analysis of identified issues, and a systematic and imaginative use of literature; an ability to develop cogent arguments and to site those arguments within a clearly understood theoretical framework. Evidence of originality in terms of content, presentation and use of sources. 85-100% (equivalent to First Class Honours) In addition to the above, an ability to provide detailed analysis of complex issues and synthesise wideranging literature; an ability to present arguments with elegance and perception and locate them within a sophisticated theoretical framework. A high level of originality in content, presentation and argument. SUPPORT AND INFORMATION Institutional/ University All students benefit from: University induction week Student Handbook: the University and you Course Handbook Page 7 of 11 Extensive library facilities Computer pool rooms (indicate number of workstations by site) E-mail address Welfare service Personal tutor for advice and guidance Course-specific Additional support, specifically where courses have nontraditional patterns of delivery (e.g. distance learning and work-based learning) include: In addition, students on this course benefit from: Please refer to information held in studentcentral. Course induction Course handbook Personal tutor for advice and guidance Page 8 of 11 PART 3: COURSE SPECIFIC REGULATIONS COURSE STRUCTURE This section includes an outline of the structure of the programme, including stages of study and progression points. Course Leaders may choose to include a structure diagram here. Modules Status: M = Mandatory (modules which must be taken and passed to be eligible for the award) C = Compulsory (modules which must be taken to be eligible for the award) O = Optional (optional modules) A = Additional (modules which must be taken to be eligible for an award accredited by a professional, statutory or regulatory body, including any non-credit bearing modules) Level8 Module code Status Module title Credit 4 SS103 C Social Science Research Methods 20 4 SS107 C Introduction to Sociology 20 4 SS130 C Contemporary Social Inequalities 20 4 SS113 C Introduction to Applied Psychology 20 4 SS123 C Developmental Psychology 20 4 SS122 C Foundations of Sociology 20 4 SS124 C ICT for the Social Sciences 00 4 SS217 C Theorising the Social World 20 5 SS238 C Research Project 20 5 SS229 O Research Project (for SOCRATES students) 10 5 SS215 O Analysis and Review 20 5 SS242 O Analysis and Review (for SOCRATES students) 10 5 SS246 C Critical Psychology: theory and methods 20 5 SS251 O Community Participation and Development 20 5 SS252 C Social Psychology 20 5 SS253 C Sociology and the Life Course 20 6 SS329 C Dissertation 40 6 SS365 C Sociological Analysis: Concepts & Theories 20 6 SS395 O Ecopsychology 20 6 SS344 C Sociological Analysis: Critical Methodologies 20 6 SS392 O Community Participation and Development 20 6 SS302 O Psychology and Social Change 20 6 SS348 O Developing a Therapeutic Relationship 20 6 SS378 O Critical Addiction Studies 20 6 SS606 O Cyberpsychology 20 8 All modules have learning outcomes commensurate with the FHEQ levels 0, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8. List the level which corresponds with the learning outcomes of each module. Page 9 of 11 AWARD AND CLASSIFICATION Award type Final Award* Title Level Eligibility for award Classification of award Total credits9 Minimum credits10 Ratio of marks11: Class of award BA (Hons) Applied Psychology & Sociology 6 Total credit 360 Minimum credit at level of award Other: 360 Levels 5 and 6 (25:75) Honours degree Intermediate Dip HE Applied Psychology & Sociology 5 Total credit 240 Minimum credit at level of award Other: 240 Level 5 marks Not applicable Intermediate Cert HE Applied Pscyhology & Sociology 4 Total credit 120 Minimum credit at level of award 120 Level 4 marks Not applicable Select Select Total credit Select Minimum credit at level of award Select Select Select Select Select Total credit Select Minimum credit at level of award Select Select Select *Foundation degrees only Progression routes from award: Award classifications Mark/ band % Foundation degree Honours degree Postgraduate12 degree (excludes PGCE and BM BS) 70% - 100% Distinction First (1) Distinction 60% - 69.99% Merit Upper second (2:1) Merit Lower second (2:2) Pass 50% - 59.99% 40% - 49.99% Pass Third (3) 9 Total number of credits required to be eligible for the award. Minimum number of credits required, at level of award, to be eligible for the award. 11 Algorithm used to determine the classification of the final award (all marks are credit-weighted). For a Masters degree, the mark for the final element (e.g, dissertation) must be in the corresponding class of award. 12 Refers to taught provision: PG Cert, PG Dip, Masters. 10 Page 10 of 11 EXAMINATION AND ASSESSMENT REGULATIONS Please refer to the Course Approval and Review Handbook when completing this section. The examination and assessment regulations for the course should be in accordance with the University’s General Examination and Assessment Regulations for Taught Courses (available from staffcentral or studentcentral). Specific regulations which materially affect assessment, progression and award on the course e.g. Where referrals or repeat of modules are not permitted in line with the University’s General Examination and Assessment Regulations for Taught Courses. The pass mark for each module is 40%. To qualify for an award the student must achieve the full credit for that award. Students will not be awarded interim awards if they are progressing to the next level (i.e. at the conclusion of study the student will receive the highest award for which they qualify, but not the interim awards). Classification of the degree is based on 25:75 weighting of marks achieved at levels 5 and 6 respectively. All modules within a level are weighted according to their credit value (i.e. the mark for a 20 credit module carries twice the weight of that of a 10 credit module). Exceptions required by PSRB These require the approval of the Chair of the Academic Board Document template revised: 2010 Page 11 of 11