Zoology “A house is a compressed territory where our basic needs can be fulfilled close by and safely. A sound zoo enclosure is the equivalent for an animal (with the noteworthy absence of a fireplace or the like, present in every human habitation). Finding within it all the places it needs—a lookout, a place for resting, for eating and drinking, for bathing, for grooming, etc.—and finding that there is no need to go hunting, food appearing six days a week, an animal will take possession of its zoo space in the same way it would lay claim to a new space in the wild, exploring it and marking it out in the normal ways of its species” Structure: ch. 4, long chapter about zoos that ends with a brief comparison with religion—near the beginning of the book Martel appears to begin a theme that religion provides the structure that humans need to explore their spiritual beliefs. He uses a metaphor—comparing our houses to “territory”—to express that we all—animals AND humans-have the need to claim an area as our own so that we can meet our own physical needs in safety. By using this comparison, Martel expresses the fact that we all create a structure that meets our physical needs: the need for food, for sleep, for safety. Martel makes this point early in the book so that the reader can see that until physical needs are met, we are all just like animals. Only after the physical needs are met can we deal with spiritual or emotional needs; he begins to express this difference by pointing out the lack of “a fireplace or the like” in animal homes. The fireplace in this parenthetical statement symbolizes the intellect that separates humans from animals: it was the moment that we discovered fire that humans became capable of invention. This distinction is linked to the final point of this chapter, which is that we misunderstand zoos much like we misunderstand religion, mostly because we have “illusions about freedom” that lead us to forget that just as our physical needs—like those of animals—must be met in safety, so do our spiritual needs. Like a zoo, religion provides a safe environment to discover God and our place in His world. Martel chooses to end the chapter with this brief statement to deliver the punchline that is his real point: just like we don’t understand zoos, we really don’t understand religion. “There are many examples of animals coming to surprising living arrangements. All are instances of that animal equivalent of anthropomorphism: zoomorphism, where an animal takes a human being or another animal to be one of its kind . . . .What could be the explanation for zoomorphism? Can’t a rhinoceros distinguish big from small, tough hide from soft fur? Isn’t it plain to a dolphin what a dolphin is like? I believe the answer lies in something I mentioned earlier, that measure of madness that moves life in strange but saving ways. The golden agouti, like the rhinoceros, was in need of companionship. The circus lions don’t care to know that their leader is a weakling human; the fiction guarantees their social wellbeing and staves off violent anarchy. As for the lion cub, they would positively keel over with fright if they knew their mother was a dog, for that would mean they were motherless, the absolute worst condition imaginable for any warm –blooded life. I’m sure even the adult viper, as it swallowed the mouse, must have felt somewhere in its undeveloped mind a twinge of regret, a feeling that something greater was just missed, an imaginative leap away from the lonely crude reality of a reptile.” Structure: Chapter 32-- This chapter follows the one where the two Kumars—representing science and religion—visit the zoo. It focuses entirely on the phenomenon of animals who develop relationships with members of other species. It immediately precedes a chapter where the writer’s pov reenters the story. Here, Martel appears to send the message that some universal guiding force—perhaps God-- pushes all creatures toward salvation. He calls the force a “measure of madness”; the word measure has several meanings, but when it is a noun, it means either a standard unit that expresses the size of something or a plan or course of action to achieve a purpose. This double meaning expresses two ideas at the same time, but both ideas imply that someone (again, God?) is acting, either to gauge an amount or make and implement a plan. He follows this assertion with proof from the animal world that animals, because they are not capable of abstract thought, “don’t care to know” that they are engaged in relationships that are illogical, but his implication is that nature would erupt in “violent anarchy” if they could understand their situations better. Anarchy—the revolt against governing structures—is something only humans can carry out because they understand the structures and their own role in them. The passage ends with the observation that for an animal trying to survive through unusual means, the regret that they can’t experience “something greater” is possibly just a “twinge” (which is always associated with pain); humans, on the other hand, are capable of understanding their circumstances and should not allow them to determine their awareness of God’s push toward salvation. In a chapter that claims to be about zoomorphism, Martel uses anthropomorphism to make a point about God. Since he disproved the validity of anthropomorphism in Chapter 4, the reader can assume that referring to animals as having human emotional responses in this passage from Chapter 32 is a figurative device designed to highlight his point. Religion “ ‘Hello, sir. It’s good of you to come to the zoo.’ ” “ ‘I come here all the time. One might say it’s my temple . . . .I don’t believe in religion. Religion is darkness.’” Darkness? I was puzzled. I thought, Darkness is the last thing that religion is. Religion is light. Was he testing me? . . . . “ ‘There are no grounds for going beyond a scientific explanation of reality and no sound reason for believing anything but our sense experience. A clear intellect, close attention to detail and a little scientific knowledge will expose religion as superstitious bosh. God does not exist.’” . . . . This was all a bit much for me. The tone was right— loving and brave—but the details seemed bleak. I said nothing. It wasn’t for fear of angering Mr. Kumar. I was more afraid that in a few words thrown out he might destroy something that I loved. What if his words had the effect of polio on me? What a terrible disease that must be if it could kill God in a man. . . . He became my favourite teacher at Petit Seminaire and the reason I studied zoology at the University of Toronto. I felt a kinship with him. It was my first clue that atheists are my brothers and sisters of a different faith, and every word they speak speaks of faith. Like me, they go as far as the legs of reason will carry them – and then they leap.” This exchange appears in Chapter 7. Mr. Kumar is Pi’s science teacher and a man of the same name introduced him to Islam. The chapter comes right before the one where Richard Parker eats the goat, which teaches Pi the lesson that animals are not the cute and loving creatures he might have thought. His father wants him to learn this brutal truth Theme statement: Martel presents a theme that having faith in something is what connects us all. Temple = place of worship Belief is NOT based on reason: Mr. Kumar is using vocabulary that reveals that he does acknowledge that some things are accepted on faith Darkness = ignorance Light = knowledge Testing is ironic because in this situation Pi deeply understands something that his teacher fails to grasp Bleak = without hope; lacking vegetation and exposed to the elements Bosh = something regarded as absurd Pi recognizes that Mr. Kumar’s episode of polio destroyed his faith—extremely difficult circumstances can have that effect and those who don’t understand them can’t judge their impact Kinship = blood relationship (blood is a symbol of faith) “legs of reason” = Mr. Kumar is crippled from polio Leap of faith: the word faith is repeated and then alluded to in a way that he will never forget.