Messinian Abstract - Lamont

advertisement
Steps towards a comprehensive understanding of the Messinian Salinity Crisis
Wiliam B. F. RYAN
Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University, Palisades, NY, USA,
billr@ldeo.columbia.edu
There are several observations that must be reconciled when trying to decode the
Messinian Salinity Crisis.











The salinity of the Mediterranean increased before the onset of the first
evaporite bed.
The initial gypsum appeared within the same precession cycle in all marginal
settings and in continuity with underlying clays.
All first cycle beds, comprising selenite layers 1 through 16, were deposited
in a subaqueous environment without emersion. The accommodation space
was never filled.
An erosion surface that extends across the shelf to beneath the edge of the
mobile salt layer on all passive margins.
Detrital wedges at the base of the slope pass beneath and into the mobile
layer. The wedge volume is less than the amount of sediment eroded from
the margin.
The mobile layer displays internal stratification seaward of river deltas, and
is transparent in distal settings, suggesting substantial detritus within this
layer at proximal locations.
The volume of the mobile salt layer is approximately one-quarter the volume
of the pre-MSC Mediterranean.
The Lago-Mare sediments in the deep-sea drill cores contain shallow-water
fauna and flora requiring sunlight. For Lago-Mare sediments to be present
also in margin settings, there had to be large and rapid variations of water
thickness.
The thick “M” reflectors that conformably cap the mobile salt layer in the
western basins are not present in the east. Instead, the top of the salt layer is
significant eroded, and this layer is overlain by Trubi-equivalent marls with
room only for a thin Lago-Mare interval.
In both the western and eastern basins, the mobile salt layer originally
onlapped the slope. The mobile layer has since flowed basinward and its
edge has become detached in slivers.
Mobile salt movement occurs before the accumulation of significant
overburden.
A scenario to account for these observations begins with restriction of the inlet from
the Atlantic. As its sill shoaled, salinity within the Mediterranean increased. Once the
brine reached concentration to initiate sulfate precipitation, the first selenite bed
began to grow in all marginal areas. During the wetter part of each subsequent
precession cycle, salinity decreased and selenite growth gave way to carbonate
sedimentation. The increasing density of the brine, thickest above the basin floors,
induced a load on the lithosphere, causing basin centers to subside and peripheral
bulges to emerge. The bulges further restricted the entry of Atlantic water, thus
concentrating the brine towards halite saturation. The concentration added to the
brine load so that eventually a combination of peripheral uplift and eustacy closed
or severely restricted the inlet. Evaporative drawdown of the brine accelerated
halite precipitation.
Drawdown during halite precipitation accounts for the timing of the emergence of
the shelves after the first cycle gypsum, onset of massive erosion, delivery of
detritus into the salt layer, the observed increase in the thickness of the salt layer
with greater depth below today’s sealevel and the total volume of salt. Formation of
the mobile salt layer ceased when the brine had mostly evaporated. The only
remaining sources of water were rivers and spillage from the Paratethys. Gypsum
and halite on the exposed margins were eroded or dissolved and re-deposited as
clastics, as well as re-precipitated to form the “M” reflectors with the second cycle
evaporates. The load of mobile layer, when combined with the weight of the
returning Pliocene water, further depressed the basin centers so that the
accumulated salt flowed towards its depocenter under its own weight. This
phenomenon explains the early mobility.
RCMBNS 21013
email
IstanbulRCMNS2013
https://www.arber.com.tr/rcmns2013.org/index.php/home
Download