Fall 2011 & Spring 2012 - Southeastern Louisiana University

advertisement
Southeastern Louisiana University Cooperating Teacher Field Experience Questionnaire
Fall 2011 & Spring 2012
Item
Result
Ordinal
N
%
Mean
1. Scheduling candidates for observations/direct teaching experiences in my classroom was easy and
convenient.
Strongly Agree
3 123
73.65%
Agree
2
43
25.75% 2.785
Disagree
1
1
0.60%
2. Candidates displayed appropriate professionalism (dress, conduct, and interaction with students).
Strongly Agree
3 144
81.31%
Agree
2
32
18.08% 2.809
Disagree
1
1
0.56%
3. Candidates displayed openness to work with diverse students (academic, racial, gender, and ethnic).
Strongly Agree
3 123
82.00%
Agree
2
26
17.33% 2.814
Disagree
1
1
0.67%
4. Instructions provided by Form E provided you with clear, concise information on the requirements
needed by each candidate.
Strongly Agree
3
83
62.88%
Agree
2
42
31.82% 2.576
Disagree
1
7
5.30%
5. The organizational structure of my school for assigning candidates to my classroom was effective.
Strongly Agree
3 126
72.41%
Agree
2
47
27.01% 2.718
Disagree
1
1
0.57%
6. Accepting candidates in my classroom was beneficial to my students.
Strongly Agree
3
74
51.75%
Agree
2
57
39.86% 2.433
Disagree
1
12
8.39%
7. Accepting candidates in my classroom was beneficial to me as a teacher.
Strongly Agree
3
75
52.08%
Agree
2
57
39.58% 2.451
Disagree
1
14
9.72%
8. Each candidate had me sign Form C to indicate that he/she had completed observations or direct
teaching in my class.
Yes
2 174
84.88% 1.849
No
1
31
15.12%
9. Form B on the demographics of my class was prepared in advance and available for all Southeastern
candidates so that classroom disturbance was minimal.
Yes
2 151
81.62% 1.816
No
1
34
18.38%
10. I have completed Form A, which is the only survey that indicates my qualifications.
Yes
2 141
81.98% 1.820
No
1
31
18.02%
Southeastern Louisiana University Cooperating Teacher Field Experience Questionnaire
Fall 2012 & Spring 2013
Item
Result
Ordinal N
%
Mean
1. Scheduling candidates for observations/direct teaching experiences in my classroom was easy and
convenient.
Strongly Agree
3
36
75.00%
Agree
2
11
22.92%
2.729
Disagree
1
1
2.08%
2. Candidates displayed appropriate professionalism (dress, conduct, and interaction with students).
Strongly Agree
3
38
76.00%
Agree
2
12
24.00%
2.760
Disagree
1
0
0.00%
3. Candidates displayed openness to work with diverse students (academic, racial, gender, and ethnic).
Strongly Agree
3
37
82.22%
Agree
2
8
17.78%
2.823
Disagree
1
0
0.00%
4. Instructions provided by Form E provided you with clear, concise information on the requirements
needed by each candidate.
Strongly Agree
3
30
68.18%
Agree
2
12
27.27%
2.636
Disagree
1
2
4.55%
5. The organizational structure of my school for assigning candidates to my classroom was effective.
Strongly Agree
3
38
79.17%
Agree
2
10
20.83%
2.636
Disagree
1
0
0.00%
6. Accepting candidates in my classroom was beneficial to my students.
Strongly Agree
3
28
65.12%
Agree
2
13
30.23%
2.605
Disagree
1
2
4.65%
7. Accepting candidates in my classroom was beneficial to me as a teacher.
Strongly Agree
3
28
65.12%
Agree
2
14
32.56%
2.627
Disagree
1
1
2.33%
8. Each candidate had me sign Form C to indicate that he/she had completed observations or direct
teaching in my class.
Yes
2
46
100.00%
2.000
No
1
0
0.00%
9. Form B on the demographics of my class was prepared in advance and available for all Southeastern
candidates so that classroom disturbance was minimal.
Yes
2
41
89.13%
1.892
No
1
5
10.87%
10. I have completed Form A, which is the only survey that indicates my qualifications.
Yes
2
36
87.80%
1.878
No
1
5
12.20%
Southeastern Louisiana University Cooperating Teacher Field Experience Questionnaire
Fall 2013 & Spring 2014
Item
Result
Ordinal
N
%
Mean
1. Scheduling candidates for observations/direct teaching experiences in my classroom was easy and
convenient.
Strongly Agree
3
20
80.00%
Agree
2
5
20.00%
2.800
Disagree
1
0
0.00%
2. Candidates displayed appropriate professionalism (dress, conduct, and interaction with students).
Strongly Agree
3
23
82.14%
Agree
2
5
17.86%
2.821
Disagree
1
0
0.00%
3. Candidates displayed openness to work with diverse students (academic, racial, gender, and ethnic).
Strongly Agree
3
22
88.00%
Agree
2
3
12.00%
2.880
Disagree
1
0
0.00%
4. Instructions provided by Form E provided you with clear, concise information on the requirements
needed by each candidate.
Strongly Agree
3
15
55.56%
Agree
2
11
40.74%
2.519
Disagree
1
1
3.70%
5. The organizational structure of my school for assigning candidates to my classroom was effective.
Strongly Agree
3
19
70.37%
Agree
2
7
25.93%
2.667
Disagree
1
1
3.70%
6. Accepting candidates in my classroom was beneficial to my students.
Strongly Agree
3
13
54.17%
Agree
2
6
25.00%
2.333
Disagree
1
5
20.83%
7. Accepting candidates in my classroom was beneficial to me as a teacher.
Strongly Agree
3
12
52.17%
Agree
2
6
26.09%
2.304
Disagree
1
5
21.74%
8. Each candidate had me sign Form C to indicate that he/she had completed observations or direct
teaching in my class.
Yes
2
28
96.56%
1.965
No
1
1
3.45%
9. Form B on the demographics of my class was prepared in advance and available for all Southeastern
candidates so that classroom disturbance was minimal.
Yes
2
7
58.62%
1.585
No
1
12
41.38%
10. I have completed Form A, which is the only survey that indicates my qualifications.
Yes
2
22
75.86%
1.758
No
1
7
24.14%
Download