SUPPORTING INFORMATION FULL LEGENDS
Supplementary tables
Table S1. Summary of RAD sequencing. Sample name, barcode, number of reads after
trimming, and total sequence length of each individual of the mapping population are listed.
Table S2. Detailed information of 'Carrizo' linkage groups (LGs). Locus names and their
source sequences and positions on linkage groups (centimorgan, cM) are listed.
Table S3. Detailed information of 'El Toro' linkage groups (LG). Locus names and their
source sequences and positions on Linkage groups (centimorgan, cM) are listed.
Table S4. List of distorted markers at a significance level of P < 0.05 on 'Carrizo' map.
Table S5. List of distorted markers at a significance level of P < 0.05 on 'El Toro' map.
Table S6. Number of markers and total lengths of final 'Carrizo' linkage groups 12, 18 and
21.
Table S7. Syntenic relationship of 'Carrizo' linkage groups and sorghum chromosomes.
Table S8. Syntenic relationship of 'El Toro' linkage groups and sorghum chromosomes.
Table S9. Summary of sorghum centromere locations and gaps that disrupted chromosome
collinearity surrounding sorghum centromeric regions for each chromosome pairs between
sorghum and Z. japonica.
Table S10. Syntenic relationship of 'Carrizo' linkage groups and rice chromosomes.
Table S11. Syntenic relationship of 'El Toro' linkage groups and rice chromosomes.
Table S12. Syntenic relationship of 'Carrizo' linkage groups and S. italica chromosomes.
Table S13. Syntenic relationship of 'El Toro' linkage groups and S. italica chromosomes.
Supplementary figures
Figure S1. Graphic view of the 'Carrizo' genetic map. Numbers on the top of the map are
linkage group numbers, LG1 through LG21. Cumulative map distance (cM) is shown to the
left of each linkage group and marker designation is on the right.
Figure S2. Graphic view of the 'El Toro' genetic map. Numbers on the top of the map are
linkage group numbers, LG1 through LG20. Cumulative map distance (cM) is shown to the
left of each linkage group and marker designation is on the right.
Figure S3. Comparison between zoysiagrass and S. italica genomes.
(a) Comparison between 'Carrizo' linkage groups and S. italica scaffolds. (b) Comparison
between 'El Toro' linkage groups and S. italica scaffolds. X-axis shows the genetic location
of markers on linkage groups in centiMorgans (cM); Y-axis indicates the physical position of
markers on S. italica scaffolds in megabases (Mbp). Each dot corresponds to a RAD marker.
(c) Circos plot showing centromeric insertion of S. italica scaffold 9 into S. italica scaffold 1
to form 'Carrizo' linkage groups 7, 8 and 9, and S. italica scaffold 2 into S. italica scaffold 4
to form 'Carrizo' linkage groups 20 and 21. Four 'Carrizo' linkage groups 16, 17, 18 and 19
corresponded to S. italica scaffold 3. (d) Circos plot showing centromeric insertion of S.
italica scaffold 9 into S. italica scaffold 1 to form 'El Toro' linkage groups 7 and 8, and S.
italica scaffold 2 into S. italica scaffold 4 to form 'El Toro' linkage groups 19 and 20. Four
'Carrizo' linkage groups 15, 16, 17 and 18 corresponded to S. italica scaffold 3.