Fecal Contamination and the Effects of Feral Pigs in Manoa Watershed

advertisement
Effects of Feral Pigs (Sus scrufa) on Fecal Contamination in Manoa Watershed
Dashiell Dunkell
M.S. Thesis Proposal
Advisors: Dr. Carl Evensen, Dr. Greg Bruland
Department of Natural Resource and Environmental Management
University of Hawaii at Manoa
Fall 2008
Abstract:
Fecal contamination of water bodies is a concern to resource managers because of
human and ecological health risks. In Hawaii, feral pigs have invaded many ecosystems,
and their effect on water quality and microbial contamination is not well known. Feral
pigs can disrupt soil layers, increase erosion, alter nutrient processes, and adversely effect
native plants and animals. Feral pigs may also harbor and transmit many infectious
waterborne pathogens dangerous to humans. In Hawaii, fencing and eradication of feral
pigs has been performed in sensitive terrestrial ecosystems, especially on the islands of
Hawaii and Maui, but watershed and water quality effects of feral pigs have rarely been
researched. This project proposes to (1) determine if feral pig exclusion influences fecal
indicator (Enterococcus sp.) bacteria abundance in runoff; (2) quantify spatial and
temporal variation in enterococci abundance in runoff and streams; (3) investigate the
correlations between enterococci and other water quality parameters such as total
suspended solids (TSS) and dissolved oxygen (DO). The approach will involve runoff
water samples from eight paired fenced/unfenced runoff plots, and stream samples from
multiple sites, throughout the Manoa watershed on Oahu. Runoff samples will be taken
monthly from July 2008 through March 2009, after significant storm events. Stream
samples will be taken during both wet and dry periods throughout the project. Samples
will be tested for enterococci, nutrients, and common water quality indicators such as
TSS, DO, temperature and pH. Soils samples from runoff plots will be tested for
antecedent soil moisture. Percent ground cover and canopy cover estimations for each
plot will also be recorded. Statistical analysis of enterococci abundance will allow us to
test the hypotheses: (1) that fecal contamination of runoff is increased by the presence of
feral pigs; (2) enterococci will be correlated with total suspended solids and nutrients in
runoff and stream samples; and (3) enterococci abundance in runoff and stream samples
will be highest in fall and winter because of high rainfall levels, pig breeding patterns,
and increased fruit production. This study will result in better information for the
management of Hawaiian watersheds and ecosystems.
1
Introduction:
Feral pigs (Sus scrofa) are found in a diverse range of habitats on all continents
except Antarctica, as well as many oceanic islands. Early Polynesian settlers first
introduced pigs to the Hawaiian Islands as an important food source (Katahira et al,
1993). Later Captain Cook brought European pigs during his first voyage to Hawaii.
Many other introductions followed, and pigs became feral and dispersed throughout all
the major Islands. Now the only main Hawaiian Islands free of feral pigs are Lanai and
Kaho’olawe (Noguiera et al, 2007). The pigs are considered pests that can be dangerous
to native biota. Feral pigs can also harbor and spread many potential human pathogens.
Fecal contamination caused by pigs has rarely been studied in the Pacific Islands, and
never in Manoa. This study will aid natural resource managers, helping them identify the
effects of feral pigs, and informing them on the effectiveness of fencing as a tool for
increasing water quality. This information will also allow landowners to protect the
health of their riparian areas and could benefit swimmers or other recreational users of
Hawaiian streams and rivers.
The presence of pigs in the Manoa watershed is a divisive issue in the surrounding
community, and among the many stakeholders who use the area. The pigs are hunted for
their meat, and so a sustainable population is seen as a positive to some local people.
However, many scientists, environmentalists, and local residents are concerned about the
damage pigs cause to the native vegetation and riparian areas. There are also concerns
about the disturbance and danger of hunting the pigs and the use of hunting dogs. The
possible threat to human health is an important concern and the many recreational users
of the Manoa Valley should be informed of the risks. There is anecdotal evidence that pig
populations are increasing, and that pigs are interacting with humans more often. Pig
threats to human health may also be increasing and the need to study this issue is urgent.
The Manoa Valley watershed is the ideal place for this study for many reasons.
Foremost, the University of Hawaii at Manoa is situated such that evaluation and analysis
of samples will be fast and straightforward. Likewise, the timely sampling of streams and
runoff plots will be expedited when significant rain events do occur. This study site is
also benefited by the fact that feral pigs are the only large non-human mammal that
occurs in the study area, unlike many of the other Pacific Islands where deer (Axis axis,
Odocoileus hemionus) and goats (Capra aegagrus) can occupy the same habitat as pigs.
Manoa Valley is diverse in terrain, relief, and rainfall; which should lead to varied results
in Enterococci presence.
The outlet of the Manoa watershed, Manoa Stream, feeds into the Ala Wai Canal,
an urban estuary which borders Waikiki. The Ala Wai Canal outlets just west of Waikiki
Beach, one of the most heavily-used and most well-known beaches in the state of Hawaii.
Increased pollution entering the Ala Wai should be of great concern to business leaders
and politicians because of Hawaii’s dependence on tourism, not to mention to local
surfers and beachgoers.
Fecal contamination of water bodies is of great concern and is regulated by the
EPA to ensure safety. The great diversity of pathogenic microorganisms transmitted by
contaminated water and the difficulty and cost of directly measuring all microbial
pathogens in environmental samples leads to the use of indicators, organisms that may
indicate the presence of sewage and fecal contamination, for monitoring and regulation of
recreational and drinking waters (Wade et al, 2006), (Gersberg et al, 2006). Indicator
2
organisms commonly inhabit the intestinal tract of warm-blooded animals. They are
found in fecal material at high concentrations and are easier to measure in the
environment than are pathogens. Although indicator organisms do not cause illness under
normal conditions, they represent a measure of fecal contamination.
The previous installation of runoff plots in the study area has provided a unique
opportunity for study. The paired plots will allow for the gathering of data from areas
both affected and unaffected by pigs, and will allow for different statistical methods of
analysis then samples from unpaired plots. Feral pigs have been shown to have negative
effects on soil properties as well as ecosystem functions and biodiversity (Hone, 2002),
but no one has ever investigated any link to fecal contamination in runoff to pigs in
Manoa. In Hawaii, the streams and ocean are highly prized for recreation, and tourists
visit from all over the world to enjoy the abundant natural resources. Any possible threat
to public health or environmental quality needs to be explored and researched.
Literature Review:
Invasive Species- Introduction of invasive species is known to be of great concern
all over the world, but especially for island ecosystems (Donlan and Wilcox, 2008).
Invasive species introduction is one of the main reasons Hawaii is home to 31% of the
species on the U.S. endangered species list (Allison and Miller, 2000). Hundreds of
exotic species have been introduced to Hawaii, yet feral pigs are considered one of the
worst (Nogueira, 2007). Indigenous forests on oceanic islands such as New Zealand and
the Hawaiian Islands have evolved in isolation from major landmasses and in the absence
of mammalian herbivores. As a result, indigenous flora in such areas exhibit a high
degree of endemism and are vulnerable to damage from mammalian herbivory
(Sweetapple and Nugent, 2004).
Biological invasions are a global phenomenon that can accelerate disturbance
regimes and facilitate colonization by other nonnative species (Cushman et al, 2004). A
study of a California grassland found that feral pigs promoted the colonization of exotic
species (Cushman et al, 2004). Introduced ungulates also have the potential to change the
rate and trajectory of recovery of patches of forest that have been damaged by natural and
human-induced disturbances (Wilson et al, 2006). In the presence of ungulates,
vegetation will often reestablish on these patches more slowly and with a different
species composition than in the absence of ungulates.
Impacts of exotic mammals on plant regeneration and other processes are fairly
well known, however watershed level effects of feral pigs have not been studied much in
the Pacific islands, and peer-reviewed research is scarce. In Hawaiian rain forests, an
unharvested pig population is potentially capable of doubling every 4 months (Katahira et
al, 1993). Except for malnutrition, disease, or cold weather during farrowing at high
elevations, there are no known natural factors limiting pig populations.
Pig Behaviors- Pigs consume and trample understory plants, disperse plant
propagules, degrade native bird habitat by disturbing the understory and influencing
forest succession, produce breeding sites for mosquitoes, and disrupt nutrient cycling
(Katahira et al, 1993), (Nogueira, 2007). Pigs are omnivorous and have even been shown
to threaten endangered shorebirds through predation of eggs (Donlan et al. 2007). Pig
3
rooting and other foraging activities are known to have adverse effects on soil
compaction, erosion, ground cover, and water infiltration. These activities can also
decrease biodiversity and bulk density. Pig rooting was found to be more frequent in
upper elevations and drainage lines in watersheds in Australia (Hone, 2002). In
Volcanoes National Park, Hawaii, a study found rooting behavior caused 70% of fresh
and intermediate disturbance during pig activity transects (Katahira et al, 1993). Pig
activity in the 5 x 10m plots ranged from 0.1-3.6%, with a mean of 0.7%. Estimated pig
density ranged from 0.8- 4.7 pigs/km2, with a mean of 0.8 pigs/km2. Pig activity and
density in all 3 units combined had a statistically significant (R2 = 0.81, P = 0.01, n = 9)
linear relationship. In Australia feral pig disturbance was found to be most common on
flat slopes at high elevations, and least common on steep slopes at low elevations (Hone,
1995).
The Manoa Valley has a high annual rainfall, and one study in Hawaii found an
exponential rate of increase of feral pigs relating to antecedent rainfall (Caley, 1993).
Several studies from Australia have also noted that pigs may especially thrive in
subtropical or tropical rainforests. This appears to hold true with visual assessment and
eyewitness reports of the high pig population living in Manoa. Reports in the local media
have suggested that the feral pig interactions in urban areas is increasing as well,
worrying homeowners and public health authorities (Nogueira et al, 2007). Foraging can
also cause introduction of exotic species, especially Strawberry Guava which is invading
many forests throughout the state. Feral pigs are known to spread strawberry guava (P.
cattleianum) seeds through feces and rooting behavior causes disturbances that may
enhance the spread of the exotic tree (Huenneke and Vitousek, 1990).
Health Risks- The possible human health risks caused by feral pig activities and
presence in a watershed has been documented and published in peer-reviewed journals.
For example, studies of feral pigs in Australia have shown that the foraging and
wallowing behavior of pigs can markedly increase the turbidity of water supplies, and
more importantly, they can transmit and excrete a number of infectious waterborne
organisms pathogenic to humans (Hampton et al. 2006). Specifically, populations of feral
pigs may serve as an environmental reservoir of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts and
Giardia sp. cysts for source water (Atwill et al. 1997). Other important protozoan parasite
pathogens, such as Balantidium, and Entamoeba, were detected from the feces of feral
pigs caught in metropolitan drinking water catchments (Hampton et al 2006). All are
potentially important waterborne human pathogens that pose a major threat to water
quality.
Bacteria: Indicator organisms (IOs) are commonly used to quantify fecal
contamination of water bodies, and are an integral part of water management plans
(Plummer and Long, 2007). Indictor organisms reside in the gastrointestinal tracts of
humans and animals, and are used in the United States and throughout the world to assess
the microbiological safety of drinking water, recreational waters, and shellfish waters.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency recommends the use of Escherichia coli, a
member of the fecal coliform group, as an IO for recreational waters in freshwater bodies
and members of the genus Enterococcus (the enterococci) for both freshwater and
4
saltwater (Anderson et al. 2005).
This study will use Enterococcus sp. bacteria to investigate fecal contamination
by feral pigs in the Manoa watershed. Enterococci abundance is one of the three most
common water quality tests in the United States (Noblea et al., 2003). From Santa
Monica Bay, CA to the Great Lakes levels of indicator bacteria have been shown to
correlate with incidence of illness reported by swimmers (Haile et al. 1999), (Wade,
2006). Though some research suggests that enterococci are free-living and reproduce in
Hawaiian soils (Hardina and Fujioka, 1991), mesocosm experiments have found that
enterococci do not multiply in subtropical waters and sediments (Anderson et al. 2005).
Also recent, unpublished data from remote, very undisturbed locations on Oahu has
found extremely low enterococci levels in surface waters (Ragosta, 2008).
A study in Massachusetts showed the highest IO densities occurred during spring
and summer, and the lowest densities during the fall and winter (Plummer and Long,
2007). However, this result was likely caused by the presence of housing complexes in
the study area. Human contamination was greater when there was less dilution from rain
and surface flow. A study in California (Cushman et al, 2004) found that pigs preferred
riparian areas during the summer months.
Objectives:
1 Determine if feral pigs have an adverse effect on runoff water quality and increase
fecal indicator bacteria;
2 Investigate temporal and spatial differences in enterococci presence in Manoa
streams;
3 Determine if correlation exists between other water quality factors and the
presence of enterococci;
Hypotheses:
(1) Enterococci concentrations in runoff are increased by the presence of
feral pigs;
(2) Total suspended solids and nutrient levels in stream/runoff water will
positively correlate with enterococci abundance;
(3) Enterococci levels in runoff will be highest during fall and winter
because they are bound to sediment and mobilized in wet season rain
events.
Approach:
The project will require periodic water sampling at several different stream sites
in the Manoa watershed, as well as the eight runoff plots/pig exclosures already installed
by former NREM M.S. student, Chad Browning, under direction from Dr. Greg Bruland
and Dr. Carl Evensen. The eight sites for runoff plots are located throughout the Manoa
watershed, with three of the plots near stream sampling areas. Each site consists of two
paired 5 x 10 m plots, one surrounded by a fenced pig exclosure and one unfenced. The
exclosures are constructed of 14 gauge utility fencing approximately 5 x 10 m in area and
0.91 m tall, with barbed wire around the bottom to prevent pig disturbance.
Within each individual 5 x 10 m plot is a 4.2 x 1.2 m runoff plot that channelizes
5
any runoff into a buried receptacle. Runoff plots are oriented to run from higher elevation
to lower elevation, with slopes ranging from 5-27%. Plots are sheltered from addition
overland flow from outside the plot by 15 cm tall plastic pieces buried approximately 7.5
cm deep. The plastic pieces form a water tight barrier completely surrounding the runoff
plot. Gathering of runoff is accomplished by the collection end of the runoff plot, a
triangular metal collector that funnels all runoff to a 10 cm by 5 cm opening. Attached to
the opening of the runoff collector by a metal feed tray is an 18.9 L plastic bucket. A hole
cut in the side of the bucket allows the feed tray to deposit runoff directly into the bucket,
while a watertight lid ensures that no direct rainfall will enter the bucket.
Each month a dry period will be targeted to initiate runoff collection and activate
each site. Buckets will be emptied and wiped clean and throughfall gauges emptied.
Ground and midlevel vegetation cover will be estimated and soil samples taken. Three
randomly selected 5mm soil cores will be taken from inside each plot, within the fence or
marked areas, but outside of the runoff plot. These cores will then be analyzed in the lab
for antecedent soil moisture.
Total runoff amount will be estimated by measuring runoff depth in the bucket,
then using a regression formula to give volume. After measuring depth, runoff collected
in the bucket will be thoroughly mixed, and then water samples will be taken. Disposable
sterile gloves will be worn during all water sampling procedures. One sample from each
bucket will be taken in a sterile single-use container for Enterococci testing, and one
sample from each will be taken in a clean, acid-washed bottle for use in determining total
dissolved solids, nutrients and other water quality indicators. Runoff samples will be
taken monthly throughout the year, after significant rainfall events.
Stream samples will be taken in the midpoint, middle depth of the stream. Stream
samples will be taken after the same rainfall events as runoff samples, and also several
times during the study period after significant dry spells. Disposable sterile gloves will be
worn at all times during stream sampling procedure. Stream sampling sites will be
located in multiple spots throughout the Manoa and Palolo Valleys, located as close as
possible to the runoff plots. Stream sampling sites will be located above Lyon
Arboretum, below Manoa Falls, in Palolo stream, and other areas in the upper Manoa
Valley. The samples lower in the watershed will still be above areas of homes, so sewage
system contamination will be avoided.
6
Figure 1. GIS map of Manoa Watershed slope with streams, trails, and the eight
runoff plot sites.
All water samples will be tested for enterococci, nutrients, pH, EC, total
suspended solids and other common water quality indicators. The enterococci test will be
performed using an IDEXX instrument (IDEXX Laboratories, Inc., Westbrook, Maine).
This process is the only commercial microbiological test included in the AWWA’s
Standard Methods for Examination of Water and Wastewater, 20th Edition. The nutrient
tests (NO3-, NH4+, total N, and total P) will be performed by the Agricultural Diagnostic
Services Committee (ADSC) laboratory at University of Hawaii at Manoa. Water quality
tests will be performed in the field or in the laboratory using an YSI 556 Multiprobe
device (YSI, Yellow Springs, OH), in accordance with Standard Methods. These will
include dissolved oxygen (DO), pH, electrical conductivity (EC), turbidity, and
temperature.
7
September Enterococci (2nd Run)
4000.0
3000.0
2000.0
Fenced
CFU
1000.0
Unfenced
0.0
LY MC
Site
MF
PP
Fenced
RT
WR
Figure 2. September Enterococci abundance results.
The location of stream sampling sites will allow for differences to be seen in
relief, dominant vegetation, and rainfall. The upper part of the watershed is characterized
by steep terrain, higher rainfall rates, and is dominated in places by strawberry guava and
bamboo. The lower part of the watershed has flatter terrain and lower rainfall. The
quarterly sampling of all sites will allow for any seasonal/temporal differences in fecal
contamination to be seen. Runoff plots are situated in areas with varying slope, rainfall,
and vegetation cover. This will permit us to analyze differences in enterococci abundance
based on those parameters.
The wet period samples of streams and runoff plots will be taken when the USGS
online real-time rain gauge at Kanewai Field:
(http://waterdata.usgs.gov/hi/nwis/uv/?site_no=211747157485601&PARAmeter_cd=00045)
Figure 3. USGS Kanewai Field real-time rain gauge, 8/28/08.
8
records a 0.1 inch rainfall event or higher, or if the Manoa Stream gauge
(http://waterdata.usgs.gov/nwis/uv?16240500) registers a sizable increase in flow due to
a single storm event. Samples could also be taken after a rainfall event in Manoa of more
than two inches in any 24 hours. The dry period samples will be taken only from the
stream sites and only when there has been no significant rainfall event over seven days. If
there is no optimum dry period, the samples will be taken when the USGS stream gauge
registers less than the 88 year average. Two samples from each site will be taken back to
the laboratory, one for the IDEXX machine and one for nutrient tests.
Collected data will be managed with the use of Microsoft Excel spreadsheets.
Analysis of the data will be performed using standard univariate and multivariate
statistics, including the use of ANOVA or other methods. The paired runoff plots will
allow for a matched pairs ANOVA test, analyzing the average contamination for each
plot over the year long study period. Plotting each site over time will also allow for
differences in fenced/unfenced runoff to be seen. As I take more statistics classes,
different and more rigorous analysis of the data will be performed.
Expected Outcomes:
I hypothesize that the unfenced runoff plots will show higher levels of enterococci
than will occur in the fenced plots. By the end of the study, the pig exclosures will have
been in place for over a year, which should allow for differences to become evident.
Runoff plots are in areas known to be frequented by pigs, and hopefully pig disturbance
will occur inside unfenced plots during the study period. Review of literature on feral
pigs found pig disturbance more often on flat slopes in higher elevations (Katahira et al,
1993). All the runoff plots are located low-moderate slopes and many are relatively high
elevation in the watershed, which should increase likelihood of pig disturbance. ANOVA
analysis of fenced vs. unfenced plots will allow for determination of relationship between
enterococci levels and pig exclusion. Pig disturbance and excretion should cause
increased fecal contamination that will manifest in the water samples. If this does prove
to be true, it would likely add to calls for the management or removal of pigs from the
ecosystem.
I also expect results to show a link between periods of high rainfall and increased
enterococci in streams. Increased runoff should cause enterococci, from feral pig
activities in the watershed and from bacteria living in the soil, to be transported into
stream waters. I predict that enterococci will correlate with turbidity, TSS, and nutrient
levels in water. Bacteria are known aggregate with soil and other particles in water, and
higher nutrients could be a result of fecal contamination.
I posit that runoff and stream water contamination of enterococci will be highest
during fall and winter. Winter because that is the period of highest rainfall, and
theoretically, highest runoff. Fall is when rainfall is fairly high and strawberry guava
trees are fruiting. One study found that when strawberry guava is fruiting it makes up a
majority of pigs' diets (Noguiera et al, 2007). The guava trees occur throughout the
watershed, often near the riparian zone (per author's obs.), and near or in many of the
runoff plots. If enterococci in stream samples are found to be highest in the summer
months then perhaps this highlights an unforeseen pig behavior that directly contaminates
surface waters, and is a consequence of less dilution during low flows. If enterococci in
9
runoff samples are found to be highest in spring or summer this could be a result also be a
result of unpredicted pig behaviors.
This project will shed light on unanswered questions related to the management of
natural resources such as: how does fecal contamination move through the watershed?
The results should show rainfall events and pig foraging activities are responsible for
fecal contamination. If enterococci counts in stream samples are higher after dry periods
than wet periods, this would suggest that fecal contamination is not brought into the
surface waters through runoff. This would highlight the need for keeping pigs out of
riparian areas, so that they do not directly contaminate surface waters.
Another pertinent question is: what are other factors that may influence the extent
of fecal contamination? I believe the study will illustrate that areas with less runoff will
have less fecal contamination. If this result is confirmed than the case could be made to
try and remove pigs from the upper watershed and areas with higher runoff rates. If fecal
contamination is found to be correlated with turbidity, then erosion control projects could
help mitigate pig activities. If nutrient load is correlated with fecal contamination then
steps could be taken to prevent fertilizer leaching from Lyon Arboretum or other sources.
The data generated from this research will be available for resource and land
managers throughout the Pacific Islands to help justify feral pig removal or management
plans. Pig fencing projects have already occurred on Haleakala on Maui, to protect
endangered native plants, and if fencing could be proven to provide more benefits
perhaps it would be more appealing to landowners.
Proposed Thesis Outline:
Chapter 1- Introduction, Literature Review, Objectives
Chapter 2- Materials and Methods, Experimental Design
Chapter 3- Runoff Analysis
Chapter 4- Stream Sample Analysis
Chapter 5- Discussion and Conclusion
Literature Cited:
Ahmed, W (2005). “Host species-specific metabolic fingerprint database for enterococci
and Escherichia coli and its application to identify sources of fecal contamination
in surface waters.” Applied and Environmental Microbiology 71 (8), p. 44614468.
Allison, A. and S. E. Miller (2000). “Hawaii Biological Survey: Museum resources in
support of conservation.” Nature and human society: The quest for a sustainable
world. P. H. Raven and T. Williams. Washington D.C., National Academy Press:
281-290.
Anderson, Kimberly L. John E. Whitlock, and Valerie J. Harwood (2005). “Persistence
and Differential Survival of Fecal Indicator Bacteria in Subtropical Waters and
10
Sediments.” Applied and Environmental Microbiology 71 (6), p. 3041-3048.
Anderson S.A., Turner S.J., Lewis G.D., (1997). “Enterococci in the New Zealand
environment: implications for water quality monitoring.” Water Science and
Technology 35 (11-12), pp. 325–331.
Atwill, Edward R., Richard A. Sweitzer, Maria Das Grac¸ As C. Pereira, Ian A. Gardner,
Dirk Van Vuren, Walter M. Boyce (1997). “Prevalence of and Associated Risk
Factors For Shedding Cryptosporidium parvum Oocysts and Giardia Cysts within
Feral Pig Populations in California.” Applied and Environmental Microbiology.
p. 3946–3949.
Caley, P (1993). “Population-Dynamics of Feral Pigs (Sus scrofa) in a Tropical Riverine
Habitat Complex. Wildlife Research.” 20 (5): p. 625-636.
Cooray, R. G. and D. Mueller-Dombois (1981). “Feral pig activity”. Island Ecosystems:
Biological Organization in Selected Hawaiian Communities. Stroudsburg,
Pennsylvania, Hutchinson Ross Publ. Co.: p. 309-317.
Cushman, J. Hall., Trisha A. Tierney, and Jean M. Hinds (2004). “Variable effects of
feral pig disturbances on native and exotic plants in a California grassland.”
Ecological Applications. 14(6), p. 1746–1756.
Donlan, Josh C., Karl Campbell, Wilson Cabrera, Christian Lavoie, Victor Carrion and
Felipe Cruz (2007). “Recovery of the Galápagos rail (Laterallus spilonotus)
following the removal of invasive mammals.” Biological Conservation. 138:3-4,
p. 520-524.
Donlan, Josh C. and Chris Wilcox (2008). “Diversity, invasive species and extinctions in
insular ecosystems” Journal of Applied Ecology. 45, p. 1114–1123.
Gersberg, Richard M., Michael A. Rose, Refugio Robles-Sikisaka, and Arun K. Dhar
(2006). “Quantitative Detection of Hepatitis A Virus and Enteroviruses Near the
United States-Mexico Border and Correlation with Levels of Fecal Indicator
Bacteria.” Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 72:12, p. 7438–7444
Glenn, Craig R.; McMurtry, Gary M. (1995). “Scientific studies and history of the Ala
Wai Canal, an artificial tropical estuary in Honolulu.” Pacific Scienc.e 49: (4) p.
300-318
Haile R.W., Witte J.S., Gold M., Cressey R., McGee C., Millikan R.C., Glasser A.,
Harawa N., Ervin C., Harmon P., Harper J., Dermand J., Alamillo J., Barrett K.,
Nides M., Wang G.Y. (1999). “The health effects of swimming in ocean water
contaminated by storm drain runoff.” Epidemiology;10, p. 355–63.
Hampton, Jordan; Peter B.S. Spencer; Aileen D. Elliot; and R.C. Andrew Thompson
(2006). “Prevalence of Zoonotic Pathogens from Feral Pigs in Major Public
Drinking Water Catchments in Western Australia.” EcoHealth 3, p. 103–108.
Hardina, C.M.; Fujioka R.S. (1991) “Soil-the Environmental Source of Eschericia-coli
and Enterococci in Hawaii Streams.” Environmental Toxicology and Water
Quality. 6 (2): p. 185-195.
Hone, Jim (2002). “Feral pigs in Namadgi National Park, Australia: dynamics, impacts
and management.” Biological Conservation. 105. p. 231–242.
Hone, Jim (1995). “Spatial and Temporal Aspects of Vertebrate Pest Damage with
Emphasis on Feral Pigs.” The Journal of Applied Ecology. 32:2, p. 311-319.
Huenneke, Laura Foster and Peter M. Vitousek (1990). “Seedling and clonal recruitment
of the invasive tree Psidium cattleianum: Implications for management of native
11
Hawaiian forests” Biological Conservation. 53:3, p. 199-211.
Katahira, Larry K., Patrick Finnegan, Charles P. Stone, (1993). “Eradicating feral pigs in
montane mesic habitat at Hawaii Volcanoes National Park.” Wildlife Society
Bulletin. 21. p. 269-274.
Koirala, Shesh R. Randall W. Gentry, Edmund Perfect, John S. Schwartz, and Gary S.
Sayler (2008). “Temporal variation and persistence of bacteria in streams.”
Journal of Environmental Quality. 37, p. 1560-1566.
Mascaro, Joseph, Kristen K. Becklund, R. Flint Hughes, Stefan A. Schnitzer (2008).
“Limited native plant regeneration in novel, exotic-dominated forests on Hawai’i”
Forest Ecology and Management. 256, p. 593–606
Moce-Llivina, L. “Enteroviruses and bacteriophages in bathing waters” (2005). Applied
and Environmental Microbiology 71:11, p.6838-6844.
Noblea, R.T., D.F. Mooreb, M.K. Leecasterc, C.D. McGeed, S.B. Weisberg (2003).
“Comparison of total coliform, fecal coliform, and enterococcus bacterial
indicator response for ocean recreational water quality testing.” Water Research.
37, p. 1637–1643.
Nogueira, Selene Siqueira da Cunha; Se´rgio Luiz Gama Nogueira-Filho; Michael
Bassford; Kirsten Silvius; Jose´ Manuel Vieira Fragoso (2007). "Feral pigs in
Hawai‘i: Using behavior and ecology to refine control techniques." Applied
Animal Behaviour Science. P. 108-111.
Plummer, Jeanine D.; Sharon C. Long (2007 ). "Monitoring source water for microbial
contamination: Evaluation of water quality measures". Water Research.
41 p. 3716 – 3728.
Ragosta, Guy (2008). Koolau Mountains Watershed Partnership research. Unpublished
personal communication.
Sweetapple, Peter J. and Graham Nugent (2004). “Seedling ratios: a simple method for
assessing ungulate impacts on forest understories.” Wildlife Society
Bulletin. 32:1, p. 137-147.
Wade, Timothy J., Rebecca L. Calderon, Elizabeth Sams, Michael Beach, Kristen P.
Brenner, Ann H. Williams, and Alfred P. Dufour (2006). “Rapidly Measured
Indicators of Recreational Water Quality Are Predictive of Swimming-Associated
Gastrointestinal Illness.” Environmental Health Perspectives. 114:1.
Waithman, John D.; Richard A. Sweitzer; Dirk Van Vuren; John D. Drew; Amy J.
Brinkhaus; Ian A. Gardner; Walter M. Boyce. “Range Expansion, Population
Sizes, and Management of Wild Pigs in California.” Journal of Wildlife
Management. 63:1, p. 298-308
Wilson, Deborah J., Wendy A. Ruscoe, Larry E. Burrows, Lisa M. McElrea and David
Choquenot, (2006). “An experimental study of the impacts of understorey forest
vegetation and herbivory by red deer and rodents on seedling establishment and
species composition in Waitutu Forest, New Zealand.” New Zealand Journal Of
Ecology. 30:2, p. 191-207.
Vtorov, I.P., 1993. “Feral pig removal: effects on soil microarthropods in a Hawaiian
forest.” Journal of Wildlife Management. 57, p. 875–880.
12
Download