The heavy metal ions adsorption of protein crystal, a natural porous material Junyan Zhang+, Joshua C. Falkner+, Sujin Yean#, Amy Kan#, Mason Thomson#, Vicki L. Colvin+* +Department of chemistry, #Department of Civil and environmental engineering, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005 It is of increasingly concerned about the contamination and pollutants in groundwater, especially the contamination of heavy metal ions in groundwater and wastewater. How to effectively and efficiently remove heavy metal ions in water is therefore becoming more and more serious and crucial to our daily life and the future of ecosystem. To look for efficient materials to remove heavy metal ions from water is always of great interest to environmental researchers, and a number of materials have been investigated such as polymer ion exchange resin1, polymer adsorbent2, carbon black, and so on. Of them, carbon black has been extensively using for many years to remove heavy metal ions as well as organic contaminants from water as a typical water cleaner compared with other materials because of its porous structure that bestow a large specific surface area and a high adsorption capacity 3,4. Especially, activated carbon fibers are attractive because of their uniform micro pore structure and faster adsorption kinetics than granular activated carbons5,6. The idea of introducing functional group to these artificial inorganic materials to improve their heavy metal ions adsorption capacity has been paid much attention. It has been shown that electrochemical oxidation treatment on activated carbon fibers probably created more oxygen containing functional groups which accommodate more heavy metal ions although some pore structures have been damaged during the oxidation process7. More recently, the light was shed on artificial porous materials such as silica based mesoporous8,9, porous polymer beads, ceramic hollow microspheres10 as well as microporous polymer membrane11. It is reported that methacrylamidocysteine-containing porous poly(hydroxyethlmethacrylate)chelating spherical beads with size of 150-200 m possess significant high adsorption capacity to heavy metal ions, for instance, 1.058g/g for Cd2+, 0.123g/g for As3+, 0.639g/g for Pb2+12. Based upon the ability of DNA to intercalate heavy metal ions, DNA modified porous polysulfone beads were found to be stable in water and can selectively remove heavy metal ions such as Ag+, Pb2+, Cd2+, Cu2+, and Zn2+13. Lacking of functional sites on the pore walls of porous silica materials, generally organic functionalities are immobilized onto solid porous substrate to serve as trapping sites to form complex with heavy metal ions through. Due to sulfur is a very strong ligand to most heavy metal ions, thiol group typically was introduced to modify the surface properties of porous materials in order to attract metal ions from solution based on acid-base reaction. Hybrid macroporous materials with thiol functional groups attached to titania and zirconia frameworks have been prepared through colloidal crystal templating techniques for the use to remove heavy metal ions. Since thiol groups were incorporated into the material framework during the preparation, therefore, thiol groups are attached to metal oxide firmly through sulfonate linkages. It demonstrated that the hybrid macroporous materials were effective adsorbents fopr the removal of heavy metal ions such as mercury and lead from solution14. Protein crystals have also recently been identified as valuable materials beyond their applications in biological research. Central to their use is the fact that these biomolecular crystals contain well-ordered interpenetrating micro- and, in some cases, mesoporous solvent channels. These channels provide a chemically heterogeneous and chiral environment which comprises 30-65% of the total crystal volume15,16. In lysozyme, the model system for this work, the pore diameter ranges from 1 to 2.5 nm in a series of linked major and minor pores. Figure 1 shows the major porous structure of a hen egg white lysozyme (HEWL) crystal generated from standard crystallographic information for the tetragonal crystal structure, where the pores are aligned along the c-axis of the unit cell within the crystal. With unique aspects: (1) three dimensional pores throughout whole crystal; (2) a lot of active groups on pores wall; (3) insoluble, so it is easy to be removed and recovered to reuse; (4) metal can be easily attached on pores wall through active sites, they can be considered analogous to inorganic zeolites. This paper reports the use of crosslinked HEWL protein crystals as substrate for the adsorption of metal ions from aqueous solution, the investigation of the location of adsorbed metal ions within the crystal. The results indicated clearly that protein crystals have significant potential in the application of heavy metal ions removal. Hen Egg White Lysozyme (HEWL) crystals are grown with a batch method. The typical procedures for large crystals are as following: 4 g of HEWL are dissolved completely in 50 mL sodium acetate buffer at concentration of 0.04 M at pH 4.7 followed by filtration through a syringe filter. Then 50 mL of 10 % (w/v) sodium chloride solution is added into above solution with stirring. A few hours later the crystals appear and grow big in a few days. As grown crystals are washed with 50 mL 0.1 M sodium acetate buffer containing 2.0 M NaCl at pH 4.8 three times and are finally stored at 50 mL this solution. The preparation of small protein crystals was described in elsewhere. Most applications for protein crystals require a secondary cross-linking step that is necessary due to the poor mechanical properties and stability of un-cross-linked crystals. Crystals are treated with compounds such as glutaraldehyde to form covalent bonds between key amino acid functionalities within the structure17,18. In the case of HEWL, this treatment only slightly degrades the crystal quality and provides samples that can be easily handled and even dehydrated. Cross-linked protein crystals have also been shown to be resilient under high shear conditions encountered in both fluid transfer and agitation19. Glutaraldehyde then is added to a final concentration of 0.5% to cross-linking the protein crystals, after 2 days, the crystals show color of yellow with complete cross-linking (Figure 2). Cross linked HEWL crystals are washed with Millipore water 10 times in order to remove free glutaraldehyde as well as chemicals in buffer exist within crystals pores and then are dried at air for days. The adsorption of Pd ions to cross linked protein crystals is carried out as following, 0.1g dried cross-linked HEWL crystals are put into 10 mL of K2PdCl4 at concentration of 0.1% to infiltrate metal at a certain concentration. The color of crystals became to orange as shown in Figure 2. UV-vis spectrophotometer was applied to monitor the change of K2PdCl4 solution concentration in the presence of HEWL protein crystals. Since the unique pore structure of HEWL protein crystal, there is a hypothesis that it is easier for metal ions to diffuse into protein crystal pores when smaller protein crystals are used compared with large protein crystals because the metal ions’ diffusion path is short in the case of small crystal. To verify this point, two size HEWL protein crystals are applied, 500 μm and 3μm (Figure 3), respectively. Upon UV-vis results, a figure is given as Figure 4 that, at first few hours, the adsorption rate of Pd(II) ions into small protein crystal is faster than that to large protein crystal; then both adsorption rates go to become almost the same. This confirms above hypothesis that small protein crystal would have faster metal ion adsorption rate due to short diffusion path compared with large protein crystal. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was employed to solve where the adsorbed metal ions are within protein crystals. In order to have a comparison, both cross-linked lysozyme crystal with and without Pd loading were investigated (Figure 5, Table 1). C1s at 284.6 eV was utilized as reference. No binding energy shift was found to N1s at 399.9 eV and O1s at 532.5eV of lysozyme after Pd (II) loading (not shown here). This clearly imply that nitrogen and oxygen atoms of amino acids within the lysozyme crystal did not interact with Pd(II). As for sulfur atoms of lysozyme, two sets of Gaussian doublet appeared with regard to two types of sulfur in lysozyme, the sulfur of methionine is at 162.8 eV, and the sulfur of cysteine is at 166.88 eV20. Once Pd(II) adsorbed into lysozyme crystal, S2p signals clearly shifted toward higher binding energy from 162.59 eV to 163.54 eV and from 166.88 eV to 167.49eV, respectively; while the binding energy of Pd(II) shifted to 337.3 eV from 338.2 eV20 in K2PdCl4. Above information of Pd and S apparently clues that Pd(II) interacted with the sulfur atoms of lysozyme. Pd(II) draws partial charge from sulfur atom that resulted in higher binding energy shifting to sulfur while lower binding energy shifting to Pd(II). This explores the exact positions of loaded Pd (II) within the lysozyme crystal. Figure 6 displays a cartoon of Pd(II) bound to sulfur atoms on the wall of lysozyme crystal pore. Additionally, when HEWL crystals were treated in the atmosphere of air with heating to 800C, whole crystals were burnt off with nothing left. This implies that the adsorbed heavy metal ions into HEWL crystals can be easily recovered or collected just through burning off the crystals. Upon this point, the study of thermo-gravimetric analysis (TGA) combined with Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectrometry (ICP-AES) indicates that about 19% or 8.5% of the Pd(II) infiltrated HEWL crystals is Pd complex or atomic Pd content, respectively. The adsorption of cadmium (II) to HEWL crystal was also performed in a batch system. A set of concentrations of Cd solutions diluted from 1000 ppm Cd stock solution were utilized and electrolyte solution containing 0.01 NaCl, 0.01 M THAM, and 0.01 M NaN3 at pH 8 was applied. Twenty milliliters of solution was added to 0.1 g protein. Let the sample equilibrate on a tumbler for 24 h, and then filtrate the supernatant with 0.45 μm nominal membrane filter. All filtrate were acidified with trace metal grade HNO3 acid to contain 1 % HNO3 in solution. Cadmium concentration was measured with ICP-MS. Cadmium adsorption isotherms to two different protein particles were conducted. The Kd values for large protein crystals and 3µm protein are 142 and 123 L Kg-1, respectively. The Cd adsorption constants (Kd) for both large and small lysozyme crystals are similar to those of Cd-anatase adsorption reported by Gao et al21. Cadmium adsorption behaved almost identically on both large crystals and small crystals. The results are with good agreement to what expected based on protein crystal structure that the surface area of HEWL crystal does not vary with the size of protein crystal, therefore, the total adsorption of metal of a given amount protein crystals should be the same, independent on crystal size. In order to confirm that if in this case the sulfur atoms of lysozyme also acted as binding sites for trapping Cd(II) ions, XPS was also applied to investigate the binding energy change of sulfur and cadmium atoms with data from literature as identification reference for sulfur of lysozyme and cadmium of salt (Table 1). After Cd(II) infiltrated into HEWL crystals, the binding energy of S2p shifted to 163.5 and 167.7 eV from 162.6 and 166.9 eV, respectively, corresponding to sulfurs in methionine and cysteine, a higher binding energy shifting. To Cd3d5/2, the binding energy shifted to 405 from 406.1 eV of Cd in CdCl2, clearly a lower binding energy shifting. This convinced that sulfur atoms of lysozyme play the role of trapping heavy metal ions. The adsorption of Ag(I) to HEWL crystals has also been conducted, and, finally, 7% of Ag(I) loaded HEWL crystals is Ag(I) verified by TGA. In summary, as natural porous material, protein crystal worked well as novel material for the recovery of heavy metal ions, Pd(II) and Cd(II), from aqueous solution. With XPS, the exact location of adsorbed metal ions was figured out that sulfur atoms of lysozyme acted as binding sites to trap heavy metal ions via strong coordination effect. There is no significant difference in final adsorption amount of heavy metal ions to protein crystals for large (500μm) and small protein crystals (3μm) although at first few hours the adsorption rate of heavy metal ions to small protein crystal is faster than that to large crystals. Acknowledgement Reference 1. MY. Vilensky, B. Berkowitz, and A. Warshawsky, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, 36 (2002) 1851-1855 2. G. Guclu, G.Gurdag, S.Ozgumus, Journal of applied polymer science, 90(2003)2034-2039 3. Z.H. Huang, F. Kang, Y.P. Zheng, J.B. Yang, K.M. Liang, Carbon 40(2002) 1363 4. Z. Li, M. Kruk, M. Jaroniec, S.K. Ryu, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 204(1998) 151 5. A.H. Lu, J.T. Zheng, Carbon 40 (2002) 1353 6. C.U. Pittman Jr., W. Jiang, Z.R. Yue, C.A. Leon y Leon, Carbon 37(1999) 85 7. S.-J. Park, Y.-M. Kim, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 278 (2004) 276– 281 8. X. Feng, G. E. Fryxell, L.-Q. Wang, A. Y. Kim, J. Liu and K. M. Kemner, Science, 1997, 276, 923–926 9. A. Bibby and L. Mercier, Chem. Mater., 2002, 14, 1591–1597 10. E.Bae, S.Chah, J.H.Yi, Journal of colloid and interface science 230(2000)367376 11. S.S.Fu, H.Matsuyama, M.Teramoto, D.R.Lioyd, Journal of chemical engineering of Japan 36(2003)1397-1404 12. A.Denizli, B.Garipcan, S.Emir, S.Patir, R.Say, Adsorption science & technology 20(7)(2002)607-617 13. C.S. Zhao, K.G.Yang, X.D.Liu, M.Nomizu, N.Nishi, Destalination 170(3)(2004) 263-270 14. R. C. Schroden , M Al-Daous , S. Sokolov , B. J. Melde , J. C. Lytle , A. Stein , M. C. Carbajo , J. T. Fernández and E. E. Rodríguez, J. Mater. Chem., 2002, 12 (11), 3261 – 3267 15. Margolin, A. L.; Navia, M. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40 (12)2205-2222 16. Margolin, A. L. Trends Biotechnol. 1996, 14 (7), 223-230 17. Walt, D. R.; Agayn, V. I. Trac-Trends Anal. Chem. 1994, 13 (10)425-430 18. Tashima, T.; Imai, M.; Kuroda, Y.; Yagi, S.; Nakagawa, T. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56 (2), 694-697 19. Govardhan, C. P.; Margolin, A. L. Chem. Ind. 1995, (17), 689-693 20. Chastain, J.; King Jr, R.C. edited, Handbook of X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, Physical Electronics, Inc. 1995 21. Gao, R. Wahi, A. T. Kan, J. C. Falkner, V. L. Colvin, and M. B. Tomson, Langmuir, 2004, 20(22), 9585-9593 Caption Figure 4 Schematic drawing of Pd(II) bound to sulfur atoms on the surface of protein crystal pore walls. Pod-like yellow area stands for a typical pore shape within the lysozyme crystal. On the right side of the figure, some residues on the pore’s wall are displayed on unfolded pore wall. Orange large spheres represent bound Pd (II); red spots are oxygen atoms; blue spots are nitrogen atoms; green spots adjacent large orange balls are sulfur atoms; yellow parts are carbon atoms and bonds Figure 1 Computer generated pore structure of Hen egg white lysozyme crystal Figure 2 The images of HEWL crystals (left: native HEWL crystals, middle: cross-linked HEWL crystals, right: Pd(II) adsorbed cross-linked HEWL crystals). Scale bar: 1mm Figure 3 SEM of 3 μm HEWL crystals 1.2 500 μm crystal 3 μm crystal 1 Intensity 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 0 8 16 24 32 40 48 Time (Hour) Figure 4 Adsorption of Pd(II) to large and small HEWL crystals monitored by UV-vis S of lysozyme 88 0 86 0 84 0 82 0 80 0 78 0 S of lysozyme with Pd(II) 70 0 68 0 66 0 64 0 62 0 60 0 58 0 17 8 17 4 17 0 16 6 16 2 15 8 Binding energy (eV) Figure 5 XPS spectra of S2p of HEWL crystal before and after Pd(II) adsorption Table 1 XPS data of S, Pd, and Cd before and after metal infiltration to lysozyme crystal S2p3/2 (eV) Pd 3d5/2 (eV) Cd 3d5/2 (eV) a a Original 162.80 ; 338.20 406.10a a 166.88 After metal 163.54; 337.30 405.00 infiltration 167.49 * a: Source from Chastain, J.; King Jr, R.C. edited, Handbook of X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, Physical Electronics, Inc. 1995 Figure 6 The cartoon of HEWL crystal pore structure and the location of adsorbed Pd(II) ions within the crystal 4000 3 μm crystal 500 μm crystal Linear (3 μm crystal) Linear (500 μm crystal) q(ug/kg) 3000 2000 1000 0 0 10 20 30 Cd (ug/L) Figure 7 Cd(II) adsorption isotherm on two sized HEWL crystals