4th IASPEI / IAEE International Symposium:
Effects of Surface Geology on Seismic Motion
August 23–26, 2011 ∙ University of California Santa Barbara
TUNING THE DEEP VELOCITY STRUCTURE MODELS OF THE TOKYO
METROPOLITAN AREA BASED ON 1-D SIMULATION
OF LONG-PERIOD S-WAVES
Yadab Prasad Dhakal
Tokyo Institute of Technology
Yokohama, 226-8502
Japan
Hiroaki Yamanaka
Tokyo Institute of Technology
Yokohama, 226-8502
Japan
Tsutomu Sasatani
Hokkaido University
Sapporo, 060-8628
Japan
ABSTRACT
Yamanaka and Yamada (2006) reconstructed the 3-D velocity structure model of the Kanto basin based on the Rayleigh wave phase
velocities at periods from 0.5 to 5 s derived from the microtremor array observations at more than 300 sites in the area. In this paper,
we perform 1-D simulation of long-period S-waves at sites in the north-west region of the Kanto basin for nearby, moderate
magnitude, intermediate-depth earthquakes using their model. Based on the S-waveforms comparisons, we find that the Yamanaka
and Yamada model reproduces well the observed S-waveforms at most sites located in the Tokyo metropolitan areas. However, some
of the sites near the basin edges needed refinement of the velocity structure. Second, we tune the 1-D velocity structure beneath those
sites so as to reproduce the observed S-waves from several earthquakes using the 1-D simulation; in doing so, we keep the velocity of
each layer same to that in the base model but adjust the thickness of the sedimentary layers. We, therefore, aim to reconstruct an
improved 3-D velocity structure model combining the modified 1-D structures with the existing 3-D models.
INTRODUCTION
Many big cities with a large population and long-period structures such as high-rise buildings and large oil-storage tanks, which are
susceptible to long-period ground motions, are located today on the deep sedimentary basins. The 3-D velocity structure of the
sedimentary basins greatly controls the amplitude and duration of long-period ground motions during large earthquakes. Many
institutes are involved in constructing and updating the 3-D velocity structure models of the deep sedimentary basins for the seismic
disaster mitigation planning in Japan (e.g., Koketsu et al., 2008). As a result, several 3-D velocity models have been proposed for the
Kanto basin, which is the largest basin in Japan. Although the objective of constructing such models is to accurately predict the longperiod ground motions, the models are different because they have been constructed using different data sets such as geophysical
(Koketsu and Higashi, 1992), geological (Suzuki, 1999), and earthquake data (e.g., Suzuki and Yamanaka, 2009). Therefore, joint
inversion methods have been also applied to reconstruct integrated velocity model of the Kanto basin using the different data sets
(e.g., Afnimar et al., 2003; Tanaka et al., 2005; Suzuki and Yamanaka, 2010).
Yamanaka and Yamada (2006) reconstructed the 3-D velocity structure model of the Kanto basin based on the Rayleigh wave phase
velocities at periods from 0.5 to 5 s deduced from the microtremor array observations at more than 300 sites in the area. One of the
advantages of using the deep sedimentary models from microtremor survey method for the simulation of long-period ground motions
is that the models by this method are based on the principle of propagation of long-period surface waves in the sedimentary plains,
where the surface waves are dominant for longer durations during large earthquakes. In this paper, we, therefore, consider the
Yamanaka and Yamada (2006) model as a base model for tuning the deep S-wave velocity structure of the north-west region of the
Kanto-basin. The strong motion observation sites and epicenters of the earthquakes used in this study are depicted in Fig. 1.
1
In general, direct S-wave at a basin site from 3-D simulation for a deep basin structure is essentially the same as that from 1-D
simulation for a flat layer structure just beneath the site. According to this fact, a 1-D simulation of long-period S-waves for
intermediate depth earthquakes was applied by Dhakal et al. (2009, 2010) to tune the deep velocity structure of the Tokachi basin in
Hokkaido. An advantage of using the direct S-waves from nearby intermediate-depth earthquakes is that the direct S-waves can be
easily recognized on the observed waveforms. Also, a moderate magnitude earthquake can be considered as a point source model for
simulation of long-period ground motions. Such moderate earthquakes (M4~6) have been used by many researchers for validation of
the deep velocity models in many sedimentary basins (e.g., Rodgers et al., 2008; Iwaki and Iwata, 2009). Many strong-motion records
from several such earthquakes are available now at many sites in the Kanto basin. We, therefore, make an attempt to tune the deep
velocity structure of the north-west region of the Kanto basin using the 1-D simulation of long-period S-waves. First, we briefly
describe the velocity structure model and earthquake source parameters used in this study. Second, we perform the 1-D simulation and
compare the observed and synthetic long-period (2~10 s) S-waves. Third, based on the waveform comparison, we select a site for
tuning the deep velocity structure, and refine the structure on a trial basis to reproduce the observed S-waveforms. Finally, we discuss
the limitations of the method employed in this study.
Fig. 1. Map showing the Kanto basin; our target is the north-west region. The circles denote the K-NET strong motion observation
sites used in this study. The stars denote the epicenters of the used earthquakes. The beach balls connected to the epicenters show the
focal mechanisms of the earthquakes. The thick solid lines mark the edge of basement rocks at a depth of 0 m (see Fig. 2). An inset in
the lower left corner shows an enlarged map of the central rectangular area.
VELOCITY MODEL USED
We selected the velocity model of the Kanto basin reconstructed by Yamanaka and Yamada (2006). They derived the 3-D velocity
structure model of the Kanto basin based on the Rayleigh wave phase velocities at periods from 0.5 to 5 s deduced from microtremor
array observations at more than 300 sites in the area. Their model of the velocity structure consists of three sedimentary layers above
the seismic basement having an S-wave velocity of 3.0 km/s. The top layer has variation of S-wave velocities ranging from 0.3 to 0.8
km/s (Fig. 2d). The second and third layers have S-wave velocities of 1.0 and 1.5 km/s, respectively. The depth to the top of second,
third, and basement layers are shown in Fig. 2. The maximum depth to the top of seismic basement in the Kanto basin is about 4 km in
the Boso peninsula. For the layers deeper than the seismic basement, we simplify the crustal and upper mantle structure estimated by
2
Ashiya et al. (1987) and Ishida (1992) to a 1-D structure suitable to the present study area. The material parameters of the velocity
model used in this study are expressed in Table 1.
EARTHQUAKES USED
We selected four nearby earthquakes having magnitude Mw 5.2~ 5.9 and focal depth of 68 ~101 km. We used the hypocenter location
determined by Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA) except for Event No. 2 in Table 2. The focal mechanism and epicentral location
of the events are shown in Fig. 1. We used the centroid location, focal mechanism, and seismic moment determined by the Global
CMT project for the Event No. 2 because the Global CMT solution produced a better fit between the observed and synthetic S-waves
at rock sites near the target area. For other events, the focal mechanism and seismic moment are taken from the F-net moment tensor
solution. We assumed a point source model for each earthquake and derived a triangle shaped source time function of duration ranging
from 0.9 to 1.85 s by reproducing the observed S-waves at stiff soil and rock sites. The earthquake source parameters used in this
study are summarized in Table 2.
Table 1. Material parameters of the velocity structure model used in this study
Layer
Vp (km/s)
Vs (km/s)
Density (g/cm3)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1.69-2.19
2.40
3.20
5.60
6.00
6.80
7.60
8.10
8.30
0.30~0.80
1.00
1.50
3.00
3.30
3.74
4.18
4.50
4.57
1.78~2.01
2.10
2.25
2.50
2.70
2.90
3.20
3.40
3.50
Depth (top of layer)
(km)
0.00
variable
variable
variable
5.00
14.00
27.00
60.00
70.00
Qp and Qs
100
100
150
300
500
600
1000
1000
1000
Table 2. Earthquake source parameters used in this study
Event No.
1
2
3
4
Date and Time
(JST)
1997/09/08 08:40
2006/02/01 20:36
2004/10/06 23:40
2005/07/23 16:35
Strike (°)
Dip (°)
Rake (°)
Depth (km)
Rise time (s)
50
232
200
165
71
72
31
28
41
-6
107
69
101.0
101.0
70.5
68.0
0.9
0.9
1.3
1.85
Mo (dyne.cm)
(×1023)
6.62
5.07
47.8
91.1
1-D SIMULATION
We perform the 1-D simulation of long-period S-waves using the earthquake source parameters and the velocity structure model
described in the previous sections. We apply the discrete wavenumber method (Bouchon, 1981) for the waveform simulation. Because
of the limited space, we show a comparison of the S-waveforms for only the horizontal components at selected sites which are
common to the used three or all four earthquakes. In the comparison, we focus on the first cycle of the observed and synthetic Swaveforms.
1997/09/08 Earthquake (Event No. 1, Table 2)
Figure 3 displays the bandpass filtered [0.25 to 0.5 Hz] observed and synthetic S-waveforms for the 1997 event. The waveforms are
plotted in order of epicentral distance. The observed S-waveforms are well reproduced at the IBR005 and TCG011 sites, which are
located on stiff soils above the shallow seismic basement (see Fig. 2). The first cycle of the observed S-waveforms exhibits a good
agreement with the synthetic S-waveforms at the following deep soil sites: TKY007, IBR016, TKY006, SIT003, and GNM010. The
synthetic S-waveforms underestimate the observed ones at the deep soil CHB002 and CHB001 sites, while they overestimate at the
TCG012 and SIT001 sites, suggesting an inappropriate velocity structure beneath the sites.
3
2006/02/01 Earthquake (Event No. 2, Table 2)
Figure 4 displays the bandpass filtered [0.15 to 0.5 Hz] observed and synthetic S-waveforms for the 2006 event. The waveforms are
plotted in order of epicentral distance. The observed S-waveforms are well reproduced at the TCG011site, which is located on stiff
soil above the shallow seismic basement (see Fig. 2). The observed S-waveforms at the CHB002, TKY026, IBR016, TKY015,
SIT003, and GNM010 deep soil sites are also well reproduced. At the TCG012 site, the observed S-waveforms are overestimated
similar to the previous event. At the other sites, one of the two horizontal components shows a good agreement between the observed
and synthetic S-waveforms while the other component either underestimates or overestimates the observed one. In fact, some of these
sites, such as the TKY007 and TKY006 sites, showed good agreements between the observed and synthetic S-waveforms for the both
components for the previous event.
(a)
(c)
(b)
(d)
Fig. 2. Maps showing the depths to the top of layers having S-wave velocities of (a) 3.0, (b) 1.5, and (c) 1.0 km/s with variation of (d)
S-wave velocity of the top layer in m/s (after Yamanaka and Yamada, 2006). The contours of 0 m depths for the layers in (a), (b), and
(c) are indicated by red lines.
4
Obs.
Syn.
NS
0.202
CHB002
0.080
0.075
TKY007
0.076
IBR016 0.070
0.101
CHB001 0.171
0.090
0.131
0.079
TKY006 0.059
0.063
SIT003 0.117
0.089
0.044
0.042
0.015
0.065
0.063
GNM010
0.112
0.028
0.018
TKY001 0.006
0.019
0.009
0.004
0.032
0.037
0.021
TCG011
0.026
0.019
SIT001
0.078
0.017
0.027
0.006
0.007
0.026
0.028
IBR005
0.049
0.043
0.011
0.001
40 20
EW
NS
0.065
0.126
TCG012
0.070
0.085
0.186
0.064
30
Time (s)
Syn.
S-wave
0.037
0.073
KNG011 0.010
0.013
20
Obs.
EW
30
Time (s)
40
20
30
Time (s)
40 20
30
Time (s)
40
Fig. 3. Observed (black) and synthetic (red) velocity waveforms for the Mw 5.2, 1997 earthquake (Event No. 1, Table 2). The
waveforms are bandpass filtered at 0.25-0.5 Hz; they are normalized by the maximum observed S-wave amplitude at each site.
Numbers attached above and below to each waveform show the maximum amplitudes in cm/s for the observed and synthetic Swaveforms, respectively. The waveforms are plotted in order of epicentral distance and the site codes are indicated at the left of the
NS component waveforms.
2004/10/06 Earthquake (Event No. 3, Table 2)
The bandpass [0.1-0.5 Hz] filtered observed and synthetic S-waveforms for the 2004 event are displayed in Fig. 5. The waveforms are
plotted in order of epicentral distance. The observed and synthetic S-waveforms show very good agreement at the IBR005 and
TCG011 sites, which are located on stiff soils above the shallow seismic basement (see Fig. 2). Similar to the previous two events, the
observed S-waveforms are well reproduced at the deep soil site, IBR016. Also, the observed S-waveforms are reasonably well
reproduced at the CHB002, TKY015, TKY026, SIT003, and TKY007 deep soil sites. Different from the previous two events, the
synthetic S-waveforms show a good agreement with the observed ones on the large amplitude EW component at the CHB001 site and
underestimate at the GNM010 site. But similar to the previous two events, the synthetic S-waveforms overestimate the observed ones
at the TCG012 site. At the other sites mostly located in the western part of the basin, the S-waveforms are systematically
overestimated on the EW components. This is directly related to the radiation pattern effect of the S-waves as discussed in the last
section of this paper.
2005/07/23 Earthquake (Event No. 4, Table 2)
The bandpass [0.1-0.5 Hz] filtered observed and synthetic S-waveforms for the 2005 event, which is the largest magnitude event (Mw
5.9) among the used four earthquakes, are displayed in Fig. 6. The waveforms are plotted in order of epicentral distance. The observed
and synthetic S-waveforms show a good agreement at the IBR005, TCG011, and TKY001 sites, which are located on stiff soils above
the shallow seismic basement (see Fig. 2). Similar to the previous three events, the observed S-waveforms are well reproduced at the
deep soil site, IBR016. Also, the observed S-waveforms are reasonably well reproduced at the TKY026, CHB002, TKY015, TKY007,
CHB001, TKY006, SIT003, SIT009, and SIT002 deep soil sites. Keeping the track of previous three events, the synthetic Swaveforms overestimate the observed ones at the TCG012 site for this event also. The synthetic S-waveforms at the GNM010 and
SIT001 strongly underestimate the observed ones on the EW and NS components, respectively, suggesting further investigations on
5
the used velocity structure.
Obs.
Syn.
NS
0.059
CHB002
0.036
0.028
TKY026
0.018
IBR016 0.070
0.056
0.028
TKY015
0.027
0.208
CHB001
0.052
0.050
0.042
0.047
0.044
0.048
0.026
0.048
0.057
0.083
0.050
TKY007
0.021
0.017
0.027
0.068
SIT003
0.063
0.058
0.081
0.074
TKY006
0.012
0.005
0.031
0.071
SIT009 0.078
0.029
0.070
0.065
20
30
Time (s)
Obs.
EW
40 20
Syn.
NS
S-wave
0.038
TCG012 0.092
30
Time (s)
40
EW
S-wave
0.050
0.101
GNM010 0.063
0.096
0.102
0.135
0.042
SIT002 0.075
0.041
0.120
0.013
IBR005 0.020
0.010
TCG011
0.022
0.023
KNG011
0.007
0.011
0.001
0.036
0.030
0.013
0.020
TKY001 0.011
0.003
0.009
0.022
SIT001 0.009
0.069
0.078
0.105
20
30
Time (s)
40 20
30
Time (s)
40
Fig. 4. Observed (black) and synthetic (red) velocity waveforms for the Mw 5.2, 2006 earthquake (Event No. 2, Table 2). The
waveforms are bandpass filtered at 0.15-0.5 Hz; they are normalized by the maximum observed S-wave amplitude at each site. See
captions in Fig. 3 for other details.
TUNING
In the previous section, we found that the synthetic S-waveforms systematically overestimated the observed S-waveforms at the
TCG012 site for the all used earthquakes. We noted that the radiation pattern of S-wave has strong effect on the amplitude of the Swaveforms. However, the good agreement between the observed and synthetic S-waveforms at the nearby TCG011 and IBR005 stiff
soil sites indicate that the used source parameters are satisfactory to apply for tuning the deep velocity structure at the TCG012 site.
Here we select a series of bandpass filters to compare the observed and synthetic S-waveforms starting from the low frequency band
based on the theoretical site amplifications. We assume that the number of sedimentary layers and the velocity of each layer are the
same as those in the base model. Then we change the thickness of the sedimentary layers on a trial basis until the observed and
synthetic S-waveforms fit well for the low frequency band. We check whether the new structure explains the observed S-waveforms
for the higher band than the previous ones. We try to keep the site amplifications that reproduced the observed S-waveforms for the
previous band and adjust the velocity structure to reproduce the observed S-waveforms for the higher frequency band. We continue
the process until the observed S-waveforms are well reproduced for the several frequency bands. In doing so, we compare only the
first cycle of the S-waveforms in the time domain and the Fourier spectra in the frequency domain; the time window for spectral
analysis is about 10s setting the first cycle of the S-waveforms at the centre of the time window (Dhakal et al., 2009).
6
Obs.
Syn.
NS
IBR016 0.168
0.118
0.315
CHB001
0.023
0.574
CHB002 0.130
0.996
1.552
0.913
1.442
0.771
TKY015
0.080
1.403
1.566
1.119
0.151
2.540
1.348
IBR005 0.204
0.241
SIT003 0.315
0.045
0.250
0.320
1.004
1.377
0.468
0.172
0.721
2.045
1.003
TKY007 0.136
0.898
1.218
TKY026
TCG012
15
Obs.
EW
0.967
1.562
20
25
30
35 15
Time (s)
Syn.
0.207
0.097
0.229
0.728
GNM010
0.150
0.177
0.595
1.444
0.337
0.217
0.075
TCG011
0.041
0.342
0.862
0.223
0.424
0.088
SIT002 0.090
0.048
0.162
0.251
1.001
0.173
0.502
0.043
TKY001 0.081
0.052
0.226
0.044
0.126
0.055
0.215
SIT001
KNG011
25
Time (s)
30
35
EW
SIT009
TKY006
20
NS
20 25 30 35 40 20 25 30 35 40
Time (s)
Time (s)
Fig. 5. Observed (black) and synthetic (red) velocity waveforms for the Mw 5.7, 2004 earthquake (Event No. 3, Table 2). The
waveforms are bandpass filtered at 0.1-0.5 Hz; they are normalized by the maximum observed S-wave amplitude at each site. See
captions in Fig. 3 for other details.
Figure 7 displays the observed S-waveforms and the synthetic ones for the tuned and original structures at the TCG012 site for the
four earthquakes used in this study. In the figure, we can see that for all earthquakes the synthetic S-waves using the original model
strongly overestimates the observed S-waves for all frequency bands. On the other hand, the tuned structure reproduces the observed
S-waves well for all frequency bands for the all four earthquakes. Figure 8 shows a comparison of the Fourier spectra of the observed
and synthetic S-waves; the Fourier spectra of the observed S-waveforms match well with those of the synthetic ones using the tuned
model for the dominant components. The original and tuned structures at the TCG012 site are displayed in Fig. 9. In the figure, we can
see that the first two layers in the original model are virtually absent in the tuned model; they are replaced with two thin layers based
on the K-NET PS-logging data. Also depicted in Fig. 9 is the velocity structure at the TCG012 site by the National Research Institute
for Earth Science and Disaster Prevention (NIED) model. The NIED velocity structure is not so different from the Yamanaka and
Yamada model at the TCG012 site. Because the tuned structure differs greatly from the other two models, we are currently applying
this tuning method at other sites and investigating the original and the tuned velocity models with other moderate earthquakes. In the
next section, we discuss the above results, and limitations of the 1-D simulation for tuning the deep velocity structure in the case of the
Kanto basin.
DISCUSSIONS AND CONCLUSIONS
In this study, we used the intermediate-depth moderate earthquakes for testing and tuning the deep velocity structure model of the
north-west region of the Kanto basin reconstructed by Yamanaka and Yamada (2006). They derived the 3-D velocity structure of the
Kanto basin based on the Rayleigh wave phase velocities at periods from 0.5 to 5 s deduced from microtremor array observations at
more than 300 sites in the area. We applied 1-D method of waveform simulation and compared the observed and synthetic S-
7
waveforms applying several band-pass filters. Based on the waveform comparisons, we found that the Yamanaka and Yamada model
(2006) reproduces well the observed S-waveforms at most sites located in the Tokyo metropolitan areas. However, it is found that the
observed S-waveforms are overestimated at some sites in the northern and north-west region of the Kanto-basin suggesting further
investigation of the velocity structures. We tuned the sedimentary velocity structure beneath the TCG012 site based on the 1-D
simulation of long-period S-waves. It is found that the original and tuned structures have the similar depth to the seismic basement,
but they differ largely in the layer thickness and S-wave velocities.
Syn.
Obs.
NS
Syn.
Obs.
EW
EW
NS
0.038
TCG012 0.150
S-wave
0.462
1.169
0.125
0.009
IBR005 0.113
0.205
0.163
0.337
0.142
0.099
1.778
2.222
GNM010 0.309
0.573
0.439
1.171
2.030
1.517
SIT002
0.631
0.694
TKY006 0.280
0.075
0.705
1.481
TKY001 0.133
0.105
0.503
0.894
0.145
0.289
0.743
0.186
0.294
SIT009
0.252
2.366
1.318
0.508
0.946
0.056
TCG011 0.122
0.759
TKY026 0.513
CHB002 2.115
0.559
TKY015 0.955
0.484
0.307
IBR016 0.787
2.743
2.776
3.208
2.143
3.175
2.919
1.440
1.486
1.170
0.174
0.454
CHB001
0.367
TKY007
SIT003
15
20
25
Time (s)
30
35
15
KNG011
SIT001
20
25
Time (s)
30
35
0.174
0.281
0.245
0.418
0.220
0.729
20
25
30 35
Time (s)
40 20
25
30 35
Time (s)
40
Fig. 6. Observed (black) and synthetic (red) velocity waveforms for the Mw 5.9, 2005 earthquake (Event No. 4, Table 2). The
waveforms are bandpass filtered at 0.1-0.5 Hz; they are normalized by the maximum observed S-wave amplitude at each site. See
captions in Fig. 3 for other details.
One of the difficulties in tuning the deep velocity structure based on the comparison of S-waveforms lies in the selection of time
window for the waveform comparison. For the sites located on the basin-edges, the S-waveforms can be soon followed by or
contaminated with basin surface waves. We, therefore, compared only the first cycle of the S-waveforms to avoid the effect of
possible contamination. It is also difficult to derive accurate rise times with the 1-D method for the earthquakes that occur in a
laterally highly heterogeneous upper mantle structures such as the ones beneath the Kanto basin, where the Pacific plate and the
Philippine Sea plate subduct. The propagation path acts as a low pass filter by attenuating more rapidly the high frequency waves
compared to the low frequency ones. Thus, due to the complex 3-D structure of the upper mantle beneath the Kanto basin, the path
effect is not the same in every direction. In general, the path effect is considered to be less significant for long-period ground motion
study. However, a more detailed analysis is needed to confirm the above assumption. On the other hand, the large difference of the Swave amplitudes between the two horizontal components is mostly due to the radiation pattern of S-waves. The systematic
overestimation of the S-wave amplitudes on the EW-components at western sites of the Kanto basin for the 2004 event is due to the
poor resolution of the estimated radiation pattern of S-waves. Therefore, determination of accurate focal mechanism and rise time are
8
prerequisite for tuning the deep velocity structures using the S-waveforms only. However, it is not always possible to derive the well
resolved rise time and focal mechanism for an earthquake. The comparison of the S-waveforms at the CHB002 site clearly illustrates
the importance of finding the accurate focal mechanism acceptable to each site; the waveform fit for S-wave is poor at the CHB002
site for the 1997 event, while it is reasonable for the other events. Once the source parameters are well determined, we can reliably
modify the 1-D velocity structure beneath the strong motion sites using the S-waveforms only. Therefore, we are currently
investigating the original and the tuned velocity models with a number of moderate earthquakes for which a simple propagation path
can be assumed. Probably the modified models can also be validated with the phase velocity data from the microtremor observations.
Syn.(YM)
0.05
NS
[0.15-0.3]
[0.15-0.3]
0
0
-0.05
20
25
30
0.15
[0.3-0.5]
0
40
35
40
30
35
Time (s)
40
Vel.(cm/s)
35
-0.15
20
25
30
0.3
[0.5-0.8]
0
Vel.(cm/s)
EW
-0.3
20
25
-0.05
20
25
30
0.15
[0.3-0.5]
0
35
40
35
40
25
30
35
Time (s)
40
-0.15
20
25
30
0.3
[0.5-0.8]
0
-0.3
20
Vel. (cm/s)
Vel.(cm/s)
Syn.(Tune)
0.04
Obs.
-0.1
20
25
30
0.2
[0.5-0.8]
0
-0.2
20
Syn.(Tune)
1
[0.1-0.3]
(YM)
EW
[0.15-0.3]
35
40 -0.0420
25
30
0.1
[0.3-0.5]
0
35
40
25
30
Time (s)
35
40
35
40
35
40
25
30
35
Time (s)
40
-0.1
20
25
30
0.2
[0.5-0.8]
0
-0.2
20
(b) TCG012 2006/02/01 Mw5.2 H101km
EW
[0.1-0.3]
0
0
-1
15
2
20
25
30
35
-1
15
2
[0.3-0.5]
20
25
30
35
-2
15
2.5
[0.5-0.8]
25
30
35
[0.3-0.5]
20
25
30
35
25
30
Time (s)
35
[0.5-0.8]
0
0
-2.5
15
20
0
0
-2
15
2.5
Vel.(cm/s)
Obs.
Syn.(YM)
0
-0.04
20
25
30
0.1
[0.3-0.5]
0
20
25
30
Time (s)
35
-2.5
15
20
(c) TCG012 2004/10/06 Mw5.7 H70.5km
Vel. (cm/s) Vel. (cm/s)
Vel. (cm/s)
Vel. (cm/s)
NS
0.04
[0.15-0.3]
(a) TCG012 1997/09/08 Mw5.2 H101km
1
Syn.(Tune)
0
Vel. (cm/s)
Obs.
Vel.(cm/s)
NS
0.05
NS
0.5
Obs.
Syn.(Tune)
[0.1-0.3]
EW
[0.1-0.3]
0
0
-0.5
20
25
30
1
[0.3-0.5]
0
-1
20
Syn.(YM)
0.5
25
30
Time (s)
35
40
35
40
-0.5
20
25
30
1
[0.3-0.5]
0
-1
20
25
35
40
30
35
Time (s)
40
(d) TCG012 2005/07/23 Mw5.9 H68km
Fig. 7. Comparison between the observed and synthetic S-waveforms at the TCG012 site for the earthquakes (a) 1997/09/08 (Event 1,
Table 2), (b) 2006/2/1 (Event 2, Table 2), (c) 2004/10/6 (Event 3, Table 2), and (d) 2005/7/23(Event 4, Table 2). The pass band is
shown in brackets in each panel. See Fig. 9 for the comparison of Fourier spectra.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We used the strong ground motion data from K-NET, earthquake source parameters from JMA, Global CMT database, and F-net. We
used the underground velocity models reconstructed by Yamanaka and Yamada (2006). This research was partially supported by
‘Special project for earthquake disaster mitigation in Tokyo Metropolitan area’ funded by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports,
Science, and Technology, Japan.
9
1
Fourier amp(cm/s*s)
Obs.
Syn.(YM) EW
Syn.(Tune)
[0.15-0.8]
0.1
0.1
[0.15-0.8]
0.01
Fourier amp(cm/s*s)
1
Obs.
NS
Syn.(YM)
Syn.(Tune)
1
0.01
0.8
0.2 0.3
0.5
0.2 0.3
0.5
Frequency (Hz)
Frequency (Hz)
(a) TCG012, 1997/9/8 Mw5.2 H101km
Obs.
Syn.(YM)
Syn.(Tune)
0.1
[0.1-0.8]
[0.1-0.8]
0.2 0.3 0.5 0.8
Frequency (Hz)
0.1
0.1
Obs.
Syn.(YM)
Syn.(Tune)
Obs.
Syn.(YM) EW
Syn.(Tune)
[0.15-1.0]
[0.15-0.8]
0.01
0.8
0.2 0.3
0.5
0.2 0.3
0.5
Frequency (Hz)
Frequency (Hz)
(b) TCG012, 2006/2/1 Mw5.2 H101km
Obs.
Syn.(YM)
Syn.(Tune)
1
Obs.
Syn.(YM)
Syn.(Tune)
0.1
[0.1-0.5]
(c) TCG012 2004/10/06 Mw5.7 H70.5km
0.8
EW
NS
0.1
0.01
0.1
0.2 0.3 0.5 0.8
Frequency (Hz)
1
0.1
1
1
0.1
0.01
0.1
0.8
EW
NS
Obs.
NS
Syn.(YM)
Syn.(Tune)
0.01
Fourier amp(cm/s*s)
Fourier amp(cm/s*s)
1
[0.1-0.5]
0.01
0.2 0.3
0.5 0.1
0.2 0.3
Frequency (Hz)
Frequency (Hz)
(d) TCG012 2005/07/23 Mw5.9 H68km
0.5
Fig. 8. Comparison between the observed and synthetic Fourier spectra of the S-waveforms depicted in Fig. 11. The Fourier spectra
are derived for a time window of about 10 s having the first cycle S-wave at the centre of the time window.
0
Vs (km/s)
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5
10
-1
-1.5
-2
-2.5
-3
Tune
YM
NIED
Amplification
Depth (km)
-0.5
1
0.01
Tune
YM
NIED
0.1
Frequency (Hz)
1
Fig. 9. Comparison of the S-wave velocity structures (left panel) and their site amplifications (right panel) at the TCG012 site for the
tuned (Tune), Yamanaka and Yamada (2006) (YM), and NIED (2009) models.
REFERENCES
Afnimar, K. Koketsu and M. Komazawa [2003], “3-D Structure of the Kanto basin, Japan from Joint Inversion of Refraction and
Gravity Data”, IUGG 2003 Scientific Program and Abstracts, SS04/07A/A03-002, B.487.
Ashiya, K., S. Asano, T. Yoshii, M. Ishida, and T. Nishiki [1987], “Simultaneous determination of the Three Dimensional Crustal
Structure and Hypocenters beneath the Kanto-Tokai district, Japan”, Tectonophysics, Vol. 140, pp. 13-27.
Bouchon, M. [1981], “A Simple Method to Calculate Green’s Functions for Elastic Layered Media”, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., Vol.
71, pp. 959-971.
Dhakal, Y. P., T. Sasatani, N. Takai [2009], “Tuning the deep velocity structure model by 1-D simulation of long-period S-waves”,
Proceedings of the 9th SEGJ International Symposium –Imaging and Interpretation- , Sapporo, Japan, 12-14 October, Paper ID
0112.
10
Dhakal, Y. P., T. Sasatani, N. Takai [2010], “Validation of the Deep Velocity Structure of the Tokachi Basin based on 3-D Simulation
of Long-Period Ground Motions”, Pure and Applied Geophysics, DOI 10.1007/s00024-010-0237-3.
Ishida, M. [1992], “Geometry and Relative Motion of the Philippine Sea Plate and Pacific Plate beneath the Kanto-Tokai District,
Japan”, J. Geophys. Res., Vol. 97, pp. 489-513.
Iwaki, A. and T. Iwata [2009], “Validation of 3-D Basin Structure Models for Long-Period Ground Motion Simulation in the Osaka
Basin, Western Japan”, J Seismol, Vol. 12, 197-215.
Koketsu, K. and S. Higashi [1992], “Three Dimensional Topography of Sediment/Basement Interface in Tokyo Metropolitan Area,
Central Japan”, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., Vol. 82, pp. 2328-2349.
Koketsu, K., H. Miyake, H. Fujiwara, and T. Hashimoto [2008], Progress towards a Japan Integrated Velocity Structure Model and
Long-Period Ground Motion Hazard Map, 14th World Conf. on Earthq. Engg., China, Paper ID S10-038.
National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Prevention (NIED) [2009] , http://www.j-shis.bosai.go.jp/?lang=en
Rodgers, A., N. A. Petersson, S. Nilsson, B. Sjogreen, and K. McCandless [2008], “Broadband Waveform Modeling of Moderate
Earthquakes in the San Francisco Bay Area and Preliminary Assessment of the USGS 3D Seismic Velocity Model”, Bull. Seismol.
Soc. Am., Vol. 98, pp. 969-988.
Suzuki, H. [1999], “Deep geological structure and seismic activity in the Tokyo Metropolitan area”, Journal Geography, Vol. 108, No.
3, pp. 336-339 (in Japanese with English abstract).
Suzuki, H. and H. Yamanaka [2008], “Estimation of S-wave velocity structure of deep sedimentary layers using a waveform inversion
of S-wave in earthquake record”, Butsuri-Tansa, Vol. 62, No. 2, pp. 261-275 (in Japanese with English abstract).
Suzuki, H. and H. Yamanaka [2010], “Joint Inversion Using Earthquake Ground Motion Records and Microtremor Survey Data to Swave Profile of Deep Sedimentary Layers”, Butsuri-Tansa, Vol. 63, No. 3, pp. 215-227 (in Japanese with English abstract).
Tanaka, Y., K. Koketsu, H. Miyake, T. Furumura, H. Sato, N. Hirata, H. Suzuki, and T. Masuda [2005], “The Daidaitoku Community
Model of the velocity Structure beneath Tokyo Metropolitan Area”, 2005 Joint Meeting for Earth and Planetary Science, S079, p010.
Yamanaka, H. and N. Yamada [2006], “Modeling 3D S-wave Velocity Structure of Kanto Basin for Estimation of Earthquake Ground
Motion”, Butsuri-Tansa, Vol. 59, No. 6, pp. 549-560 (in Japanese with English abstract).
11