Introduction to the Spintronics 2014 at Korea University Report Deadline 31st 3, Oct., 2014 Oct., 2014, Submission: e-mail to suzuki-y@mp.es.osaka-u.ac.jp 1. Choose two problems from following 4 problems and answer to them. 2. Write your impression/opinion of/to the lecture. I. Magnetic Crystal For a linear chain of atoms with a single spins on, show that a spin wave state is an eigen state of the following Heisenberg Hamiltonian, Sˆ Sˆ ,i Sˆ ,i 1 Sˆ ,i 1 Sˆ ,i Sˆ ,i Sˆ ,i 1 Sˆ ,i 1 H J S i S i 1 J , i Sˆ z ,i Sˆ z ,i 1 2 2 2i 2i i i 2 Sˆ z S , S z S z S , S z , Sˆ S , S z S S 1 S , S z Sˆ Sˆ iSˆ , Sˆ , Sˆ Sˆ , Sˆ S , S S S S S 1 S , S 1 x y z z z z z . And obtain dispersion relation of the spinwave (magnon). Hint: Spinwave state n Sˆ, n S , S , j , single spin(chang e of spin direction) is excited at position n. j ik x k e n n , Spin wave state n II. Please answer to following questions about spin-dependent diffusive transport. Take a z-axis as a quantization axis and define ↑ and ↓ as upwards and downwards spins along the z-axis. We also define electro-chemical potentials in a ferromagnetic material with z-upwards magnetization as s s e . Here, s is ↑ or ↓. s is the electro-chemical potential, e elemental charge, electric scalar potential. For steady states, the electro-chemical potential satisfies following relations. Here, the system is assumed to be uniform along y- and z-directions, d2 / l 2 ....(1) ; Diffusion and relaxation of spins dx 2 , 2 d 0 ....(2) ; Conservati on of charges (charge neutrality ) dx 2 Where l is spin-diffusion length, s is a electric conductivity for an electron system with spin s. The current density for the electrons with spin s is given by j s 1) s d s e dx . Imagine an Fe wire with uniform magnetization along +z-direction, which cross-section is 1.0 [m2]. Conductivities of the wire for two spin sub-channels are 7.0 [ 1 m 1 ] and 3.0 [ 1 m 1 ] . Calculate voltage appeared in each 1.0 [mm] along the wire when we pass 1.0 [mA] through the wire. 2) Next, we think about a half-metal wire with the same cross-sectional area. Half-metal is a material in which ↑ spin band is metallic but ↓ spin band has Fermi energy in a band gap. Here, let’s assume that our material has 1.0 [ 1m 1 ], 0.0 [ 1m 1 ] ,and a gap in ↓ spin band is 100 [meV]. In addition, the Fermi level is at center of the gap under zero bias voltage. Now, we magnetize a half of the wire (x<0) towards +z direction, and the rest (x>0) towards +z direction. Please discuss about I-V characteristics of the system using a view graph. 3) Then we change a left part of the wire (x>0) by a non-magnetic Cu wire with Cu , Cu , 60.0 [ 1m 1 ] . Assuming l 0.1 [ m] of a spin-diffusion length in Cu, explain a distribution of the electro-chemical potential of the system under a constant current of 1 [mA] using a graph. 4) We continue to discuss about a hetero-connection described in the question 3). From charge conservation (neutrality condition), we may easily show following relations; J e A x ; x 0 ….(3) 1 1 e J x b ; x 0 2 2 A Also, from spin-relaxation equation, we may get; ae x / l ; x 0 …(4) where a and b are unknown parameters. J J J is a total current. A is a coross-sectional area of the wire. In x>0, express and 5) using a, b, J , A, x and e, , l . At x=0, ↓ spin current is zero because of the gap. Using this condition obtain spin-splitting in the electrochemical potential at the interface, a. 6) The spin-accumulation caused by the spin-splitting results in an appearance of additional interface resistance. Please estimate its value. III. From ballistic transport to diffusive transport We think about an electric conduction in an (a) e- one-dimensional wire with one quantum channel (Fig. 1 (a)). Wire with a scatterer (Fig.1 (b)) may have following conductance given by V A (b) r Landauer-Buettiker formula: 2e 2 T. h G t 1 (c) (1) 2 t t 1 Here, e is the elementary charge, h Planck constant, T transmittance of the scatterer. T is 2 r r Fig 1.Ballistic transport in one dimensional wire expressed by using amplitude transmittance t as follows; T t . 2 If there are two scatterers (Fig. 1 (c)), by considering multiple scattering between them, we get following transmittance. G 2e 2 T2 , h 1 r 2 e 2 i 2 (2) where r is an amplitude reflectance and is a phase change because of an electron travel from one scatterer to another. 1) Show derivation of equation (2). Show a graph of conductance as a function of a distance between two scatterers. Obtain minimum and maximum conductance. 2) For a case of random distribution of scatteres, we may take average with respect to the phase change and obtain following conductance. G 1 2 2 0 d 2e 2 T2 h 1 r 2 e 2i 2 2e 2 T 2 2e 2 T . h 1 R2 h 1 R (3) Show that the equation (3) is equivalent to a diffusive (a) R sum of the multiple scattering problem that is illustrated in T R 1 T 1 R R R R T T2 T TR 2T T TR 4T T TTn T2 1 R2 Fig. 2 (b). 3) Assuming that a system with (b) R Rn n scatterers has diffusive Rn transmittance of Tn , obtain diffusive resistivity of the system with n+1 scatterers Tn R R T TRRnTn T T RRn 2 Tn TTn 1 RRn Fig. 2 Diffusive multiple scattering. (a) Two equivalent scatterers. (b) Addition of a scatterer. (Fig. 2 (b)). By considering T1 T , derive following expression of the resistivity in the system with N scatterers. Resistivit y h h 1 T N. e2 e2 T (4) This equation provides Ohm’s law with an interface resistance. IV. Spin-dependent tunneling Tunneling barrier with spin momentum, We have a spin-polarized tunneling barrier. The barrier has its own spin angular momentum, S . The barrier transmits up-spin Fig. A electron ↑ , , completely without change in phase neither in amplitude. While for down-spin amplitude transmittance and , electrons, amplitude ↓ reflectance are t and r, respectively. (1) Calculate the transmittance, t , , for an 2 electron with arbitrary spin. Hint: spin function for an electron with a spin that points , t, r, Fig. B ↑ ? direction in the polar ? coordinate is expressed as: , cos 2 up ei sin 2 Plane L down . Plane R (2) By comparing the transmittance for up-spin and down-spin electron, show following relation between the magneto-resistive effect defined as follows and the r and t. t 0, t , 2 MR t , 2 2 r t 2 2 . Hint: you may use unitarity condition of r and t. (3) For incident electrons with pure spin-polarization along , direction, estimate spin currents at L and R planes and obtain the spin-transfer torque exerted on S , assuming conservation of the total spin angular momentum of the system. Here, we have one electron par second as for the incidence. (4) Estimate the magneto-resistive effect for a current incidence with incomplete spin-polarization that is expressed by following density matrix, u m m . d S