Number Theory Midterm to Final Study Guide Review Session – Thursday May 6 in IT 222 Key definitions/theorems (and section numbers) to know: 2.4 LCM – Lowest Common Multiple and how it relates to the gcd and the prime factorization of the numbers involved. 3.1 Definition of prime Fundamental theorem of Arithmetic understand that it says that every number factors into a product of primes and that in canonical form, this factoring is unique. Know Theorem 3.1: If p is prime and p|ab then p|a or p|b Know how to show the square root of a prime is irrational (3.1) Definition of what it means for two sets to have the same cardinality (handout) Know the cardinalities of sets like: evens, odds, integers, rationals, irrationals, reals, power set of … (handouts) Understand digitalization arguments (handouts) Be able to do the sieve and describe what to do (3.2) Euclid’s theorem (Theorem 3.4) (Infinite number of primes) Define Twin primes (Section 3.3) What do we know about them and what do we not know about them? State the Goldbach conjecture. (Section 3.4) every even integer above 4 is the sum of 2 odd primes. Define congruence (Section 4.2) a b(mod n) Be able to calculate in this number system. Define complete set of residues (Section 4.2) Know theorem 4.2 Know that the first 3 statements tell us congruence is an equivalence relation. Know all about equivalence relations (handout): 1.Know what a relation is (a rule for making ordered pairs in a set S). 2. Know examples of relations that pass some of the properties but fail others. So be able to say the rule for a relation that has whatever properties are desired, like, a relation on the integers might be: aRb if a-b<10. (So that one is reflexive, not symmetric and not transitive.) Be able to use theorem 4.2 to decide questions of what divides what. (Section 4.2) Understand positional notational systems for integers (Section 4.3) So any question about the digits of a number is about starting with the representation: AnyInteger an b n an1b n1 ...a1b1 a0 On the final, you are guaranteed to have a problem using this and its most likely the base will be 10. So guaranteed on the final – using the above - Know theorem 4.4 and how this lets us reduce problems by modular arithmetic as in theorems 4.5, 4.6 and HW #27 4.5 – 9’s divide 4.6 11’s divide. Other Practice problems: First are from the take-home quiz: 1. Prove that if ** Proof: If a bmod n then gcd(a,n) gcd(b,n) a bmod n then for some k, a b kn or a kn b Euclidean Algorithm The is based on this lemma (section 2.4): If a qb r then variable names, this says: gcd(a,n) gcd(b,n). Using different If a kn b then gcd(a,n) gcd(n,b) Done. 2. Find the d=gcd(1155,910) and write d as a linear combination of 1155 and 910. **Using the above lemma repeatedly: 1155=1*910+245 910=3*245+175 245=1*175+70 175=2*70+35 70=2*75+0 So d=35 Now work backwards to get the linear combination: 35=175-2*70 = 175-2(245-1*175)=-2*245+3*175 =-2*245+3*(910-3*245) =3*910-11*245 =3*910-11*(1155-1*910) =-11*1155+14*910 3. Do the steps below: (See the RSA handout for why anyone wants to do this.) a. Pick any two different primes that are over 20 and under 80. (Call them p and q). ** You can use your own numbers I’ll use p=23 and q=29 b. Find N=pq and the call Phi=(p-1)(q-1) and figure out Phi **N=867 Phi=22*28 = 616 c. Find a value E>10 such that gcd(E,Phi)=1 ** Let E = 3 d. Solve for D such that ED=1 mod 616 ** So Find D such that ED-1=K616 or 1=3D-K616 so 1 is gcd (3,616) and we want, as above the linear combination. You work it out for yoiurs just like in 2. 4. A return to middle school: prove that equivalence of fractions is, actually, an equivalence relation. That is, assume a fraction is defined to be an ordered pair of integers (a,b) (written a a c b ) where b is not 0. Define the relation b d ** Reflevive property: Let a a b b since ab=ab a b if and only if ad=bc. be a fraction with a non-zero denominator.Then Symmetric property: Assume the same cross product. Transitive property: Assume a c b d a c b d Then we know ad=bc. But then and c e d f c a d b since it has with b,d, and f not zero. So ad=bc and cf=de. So adcf=bcde. (multiplying lefts and rights times each other.) So If c=0 then a=0 by the fundamental theorem or algebra. By the same theorem e=0 so in this a e b f case, since both cross products are 0. If c is not zero, divide both sides of adcf=bcde by cd to get af=be so a e b f 5 5 5 5 5. Find the remainder when 1 2 3 ...100 is divided by 4. ** We note that we want to find the above sum mod 4. By theorem 4.2d, this is the sum of each term mod 4. Note that any even number raised to the 5th power is divisible by 4. This each of these terms mod 4 is 0. So we need only consider the sum 15 mod 4 35 mod 4 55.mod 4.. 975 mod 4 995 mod 4 Each of these odd numbers is either one more than a multiple of 4 or 3 more than a multiple of 4. If we consider 4k+1, Note: And 4k 1 1mod 4 so by Theorem 4.2f 4k 1 15 mod 4 1mod 4 5 4k 3 5 35 mod 4 243mod 4 3mod 4 So the above sum is equal to: (again using Theorem 3.2d) 1 31 3...1 3mod 4 0 New ones: 6. Give an example of a relation that is symmetric but is neither reflexive nor transitive. ** There are many possibilities. Try (“not equal to”). 2 85 is divided by 17. 7. Find the remainder if ** Note 2 4 16 1mod17 So by Theorem 4.2f, 21 284 2 4 1 21 mod17 1mod17 So applying Theorem 4.2d, 285 2mod17 15mod17 So the remainder is 15. 8. Show that the sum of twin primes (both greater than 3) is divisible by 12. ** By our quiz theorem, we need only show that 4 divides the sum and 3 divides the sum. Suppose our twin primes are p and p+2. We know they are both add, so p=2k+1 for some k and we conclude the other p+2=2k+3So the sum is 4k+4, so 4|(p+(p+2). For 3, we know neither is divisible by 3 so p cannot be 3j for any j, and, in addition p cannot be 3j+1 for any j because if it were the other prime, p+2 would be 3j+3 which is a multiple of 3. So p=3j+2 for some j and we see the other prime p+2=3j+4, so their sum is 6j+6 which is divisible by 3. Done. 9. Prove that if p is a prime and a and n are integers and n n n n 1 and that p | a n then gcd(p ,a ) p n n n ** Proof. It is clear that p | p and that the gcd cannot exceed p So we need only show n n p | a Consider the canonical prime factorization of a p1 p2 ... pm (repeats allowed). n n n n Then the canonical prime factorization of a p1 p2 ...pm . So if p divides this, then for n n n some k, pk p So pk p is one of those factors of a Done. the next integer after it are quite interesting in term of 10. For n>2, the number n! and factors of n! are less than or equal to n while prime factorization: Show that the only prime the only prime factors of n!+1 are greater than n. ** Part 1. Consider the prime factors of n! n(n 1)(n 2)...2 1 By Corollary 1 of p. 40, if p divides n!, then p divides one of these factors so p is less than or equal to it and thus less than or equal to n. Part 2. Proof by contradiction. Suppose p is a prime with p n and p | (n!1) Since n! is the product of all natural numbers up to n, p must be a factor of n!. But then p divides both n! and n!+1, So p | (n!1) n!1So p=1. Contradiction.