2006 Annual Report of the EURATOM-MEC Association
127
TW5-4.3R1; TW5-TTMI-004
IFMIF, DESIGN INTEGRATION: (I) DEUTERON-INDUCED
ACTIVATION CROSS SECTION EVALUATION FOR THE Fe
ISOTOPES BY MEANS OF OPTICAL POTENTIAL ANALYSIS, AND
(II) DEUTERON-INDUCED ACTIVATION CROSS SECTION
EVALUATION FOR ACCELERATOR MATERIALS: Cu, Al, Nb AND
OTHERS
M. Avrigeanu, V. Avrigeanu, and F.L. Roman
“Horia Hulubei” National Institute of R&D for Physics and Nuclear Engineering, Magurele
1. Introduction
A compilation of the elastic scattering data for deuterons on the stable isotopes of Fe,
Cu and Nb, for D-energies up to 50 MeV, proves the existence of angular distributions for
deuterons on 54Fe at 8 energies between 10 and 56 MeV, 56Fe at 7 energies between 5 and
56 MeV, 58Fe at the energy of 12.3 MeV, natFe at 3 energies between 11.8 and 26 MeV,
63,65,nat
Cu at 9 energies between 11.8 and 34.4 MeV, and 93Nb at 4 energies between 11.8 and
52 MeV, as well as total reaction cross sections for 12.3 and 25.1 MeV deuterons on 54,56,58Fe
and natFe, respectively, and between 11 and 25 MeV on nat,63,65Cu. The description of
deuteron-nucleus interaction represents an important test for both the quality of
semi-microscopic optical models and evaluation of nuclear data requested for fusion reactor
technology. However, the difficulties to interpret the data in terms of the usual optical-model
potential (OMP) hampered such a comprehensive analysis [1]. The deuteron weak binding
results in significant contributions of the breakup channel and enhances a variety of reactions at
low bombarding energy. Nevertheless, a semi-microscopic analysis (e.g., [2]) appears as the
most suitable basis for the evaluation of the deuteron-induced activation cross sections
necessary for fusion applications.
2. Semi-microscopic analysis of deuteron elastic scattering on 54,56Fe at low incident energy
This work is based on the previous IFIN-HH study of the realistic effective
nucleon-nucleon (NN) interactions by using the double-folding model (DFM) for the
microscopic optical potential calculation [3,4]. The calculated microscopic real potential have
been obtained by using the M3Y, BDM3Y, and DDM3Y Paris effective NN interactions,
and a sensitivity analysis of calculated cross sections with respect to effective NN interactions is
planned in order to establish the proper use of DF nuclear potential for complex particles [1,3,5]
including deuterons. The elastic scattering of deuterons has been calculated for energies up to
50 MeV by using a modified version of the OMP computer code SCAT2 [6] (NEA Data Bank).
The deuteron elastic-scattering experiments also on the Fe, Cu and Nb stable isotopes at
incident energies lower than 20 MeV are not satisfactory described by any of the
phenomenological global OMPs of either Daehnick et al [7], Lohr and Haeberli [8] or Perey and
Perey [9]. Moreover, results from analysis of the low-energy elastic scattering data suffer from
discrete and continuous ambiguities in the OMP parameters, whose uncertainties vary for
various target nuclei and for different incident energies due to the precision of data analyzed.
128 Atentie
2006 Annual Report of the EURATOM-MEdC Association
Thus, in order to avoid too much phenomenology in these data description,
the phenomenological real potential of Woods-Saxon (WS) type is replaced by the DFM
microscopic potential while phenomenological parameters corresponding to imaginary and
spin-orbit terms are obtained by fit of the experimental double-differential cross sections.
It should be emphasized that for the real part no adjustable parameter or normalization constant
was involved in this analysis in order to couple the imaginary and spin-orbit part of the OMP so
that the predictive power of this semi-microscopic potential is preserved. As a first result,
this approach may reduce the number of the OMP parameters and the corresponding
uncertainties.
Therefore we looked for imaginary volume and surface potential parameters necessary
for description of the whole body of elastic-scattering double differential cross sections [10] for
54
Fe at 8 energies between 10 and 56 MeV, 56Fe at 7 energies between 5 and 56 MeV, 58Fe at the
energy of 12.3 MeV, and natFe at 3 energies between 11.8 and 26 MeV. Comparison of the
experimental elastic-scattering angular distributions for 54,56Fe with OMP calculations based on
the DF approach obtained by using finally the M3Y-Paris effective NN interactions and the
deuteron density distribution obtained from measured charge form factors of Abbot et al. [11]
and the phenomenological imaginary potential parameters obtained by fit, is shown in Fig. 1.
0
10
54
Fe(d,d0)
10 MeV
-1
10 0
10
-1
10
56
1.0
Fe(d,d0)
0.8
Goddard - Haeberli (1979)
5 MeV
Burgi+ (1980)
Local W
Average W
0.6
Al-Quaraishi+ (2000)
Al-Quraishi + (2000)
Local W
Average W
1.0
12 MeV
0
10
3
10
12.3 MeV
12.3 MeV
0.5
2
10
7 MeV
1
10
10
0
10
/Rutherford
/Rutherford
1
0
10
Brown+ (1973)
13 MeV
-1
10
Goddard-Haeberli (1979)
0
10
14.5 MeV
0
Brown+ (1973)
30
60
90
MeV 180
12012150
0.1
0
10
1
10
0
10
Burgi + (1980)
12.3 MeV
-1
10
Hjorth - Lin (1968)
0
Newman+ (1967)
10
-1
10
Brown (1973)
34.4 MeV
-1
10
0
10
52 MeV
-1
10
Hinterberger+ (1968)
-2
10
0
30
60
90
120
c.m. (deg)
150
180
d/d [mb/sr]
0
10
2
12
1
10
Brown+ (1961)
0
10
56 MeV
-1
10
10
30 MeV
10
10
-2
10
0
10
-4
-2
10
Jahr + (1961)
3
2
Roche+ (1974)
-2
10
11
2
10
c.m. (deg)
d/d [mb/sr]
-1
0
0
Hatanaka+ (1980)
30
30
60
60
90
90
120 150 180
120

(deg)
(deg)
c.m.
c.m.
150
180
10
0
De Leo+ (1996)
30
Figure 1. Comparison of the experimental [10] and calculated elastic-scattering differential cross
sections of deuterons on 54,56Fe by using the microscopic DF real potential and local (dotted curves) as
well as average imaginary part of the OMP (solid curves).
3. Average energy-dependent phenomenological OMP of deuterons on+54,56Fe, 63,65Cu, 93Nb
The second step of the present analysis has concerned the determination of an OMP real
part by keeping fixed the imaginary and spin-orbit potential parameters obtained within the
60
90
120
c.m. (deg)
129
2006 Annual Report of the EURATOM-MEC Association
semi-microscopic analysis, in order to obtain the full phenomenological OMP needed for
application calculations. The advantage of having well settled already at least half of the usual
OMP parameters increases obviously the accuracy of fitting the data. The calculated elastic
scattering cross sections by using the real, imaginary and spin-orbit potential parameters
obtained by fit of the experimental data at various incident energies are shown in Figs. 2,3.
54
0
10
1,0
56
Fe(d,d0)
0,8
10 MeV
5 MeV
Goddard-Haeberli (1979)
0,6
Daehnick+
Average OMP
TALYS-0.64
0
10
Al-Quraishi+ (2000)
Al-Quraishi+ (2000)
Daehnick+
Average OMP
TALYS-0.64
1,0
Burgi+ (1980)
0
10
12.3 MeV
-1
/Rutherford
10
Brown+ (1973)
0
10
13 MeV
-1
10
Goddard-Haeberli (1979)
0
10
Rutherfordd/d [mb/sr]
12 MeV
-1
10
0,53
10
7 MeV
12.3 MeV
2
10
1
101
0
10
0
0,1
3
10
12 MeV
2
10
Brown+ (1973)
30
60
90
Burgi +
(1980)
c.m.
d/d [mb/sr]
-1
10
Fe(d,d0)
120 150 180
(deg)
0
10
12.3 MeV
14.5 MeV
1
10
0
10
3
10
1
10
-1
10
Brown+ (1973)
-1
10
Roche+ (1974)
0
Hjorth-Lin (1968)
10
0
10
30 MeV
34.4 MeV
-1
10
-1
Newman et al. (1967)
-2
10 0
10
52 MeV
-1
10
-2
10
0
Hinterberger+ (1968)
30
60
90
120 150 180
c.m. (deg)
d/d [mb/sr]
10
3
103
10
56 MeV
56 MeV
1
101
10
-1
-1
10
10
-3
-3
10
10 0
0
Hatanaka+ (1980)
De Leo+ (1996)
30
30
60
60
90 120
120 150
150 180
180
90
(deg)

c.m.(deg)
c.m.
Figure 2. . Comparison of the experimental [10] and calculated angular distributions of the elastic
scattering of deuterons on 54,56Fe by using the present phenomenological OMP (solid curves), the OMP
parameters of Daehnick et al. [7] (dotted curves) and the default potential for deuterons within
TALYS-0.64 (dashed curves).
0
2006 Annual Report of the EURATOM-MEdC Association
0
10
-1
10
0
58
Daehnick+
Average OMP
TALYS-0.64
Fe(d,d0)
12.3 MeV
Brown+ (1973)
30 60 90 120 150 180
d/d [mb/sr]
d/dRutherford
130 Atentie
3
10
12.3 MeV
2
10
1
10
0
10
Brown+ (1973)
-1
10
0
30
60
c.m. (deg)
90
120 150 180
c.m. (deg)
Figure 3. Comparison of the experimental [10] and calculated angular distributions of elastic scattering
of deuterons on 58Fe using the present phenomenological OMP (solid curves), the OMP parameters
of Daehnick et al. [7] (dotted curves) and default potential for deuteron sin TALYS-0.64 (dashed curves).
1600
1200
d+
54
Fe
non [mb]
d+
Brown+ (1973)
ACSELAM
TALYS-0.64
TALYS + OMP-A
EMPIRE 2.19b24
EMPIRE + OMP-A
800
400
0
56
Fe
Brown (1973)
1600
1200
800
0
0
Dubar+ (1974)
Mayo+ (1965)
TALYS + OMP-A
EMPIRE + OMP-A
ACSELAM
Brown+ (1973)
400
10
20
30
nat
Fe
d+
58
d + Fe
40
0
10
20
30
40
50
Ed (MeV)
Figure 4. Comparison of experimental [10], ACSELAM data [12] (dot-dashed curves), and calculated
non-elastic cross sections for d+54,56,58,natFe using the average potential (OMP-A) in TALYS (solid) and
EMPIRE (dotted), and the default options of these codes (dashed and dash-dot-dotted, respectively).
On the basis of the corresponding local OMP parameters, average OMP parameters,
energy dependent have been obtained and the corresponding average angular distributions are
also shown in Figs. 2,3 by solid curves. Finally an improved description of the experimental
data is proved with respect to the predictions of Daehnick et al. [7], Lohr-Haeberl [8],
and Perey-Perey [9] global OMPs, which can be considered a suitable validation of the actual
both semi-microscopic and phenomenological optical potentials. The measured reaction cross
sections [10] are shown in Fig. 4 in comparison with the calculated values by using the present
average OMP within the codes TALYS and EMPIRE-2.19 (next section), and the corresponding
default options of these codes as well as the evaluated data of the library ACSELAM [12].
A similar analysis of the experimental elastic-scattering differential cross sections [10]
for deuterons incident on the target nuclei 63,65Cu and 93Nb has led also to an average OMP for
these isotopes. The comparison of experimental elastic-scattering angular distributions for
63,65
Cu, 93Nb and the calculated values obtained by using these OMPs and Daehnick et al. [7]
as well as default TALYS code global potentials are shown in Figs. 5-7. On the other hand,
131
2006 Annual Report of the EURATOM-MEC Association
Cu(d,d0)
10
Lee Jr.+ (1964)
OMP Daehnick et al.
present work
TALYS-default OMPKD
1
10
12 MeV
0
10
12 MeV
65
Cu(d,d0)
3
10
Lee Jr. + (1964)
1
10
34.4 MeV
0
14.5 MeV
Hjort+ (1968)
10
Neuwman+ (1967)
-1
10
-1
10
/Rutherford
d/d [mb/sr]
63
3
/Rutherford
d/d [mb/sr]
also the experimental total reaction cross sections [10] for d+63,65Cu are compared in Fig. 5 with
the results obtained by using the present average OMP, Daehnick et al. [7] potential, as well as
both default options of TALYS code, and the evaluated ACSELAM library data. In the same
way have been compared in Fig. 6 the corresponding calculated and experimental
elastic-scattering differential cross sections and total reaction cross sections for deuterons
interacting with the natural Copper, while the same comparison for 93Nb is shown in Fig. 7.
-2
10
0
34.4 MeV
10
0
Newman+ (1967)
30
60
90
120 150 180
c.m. [deg]
-1
10
-2
10
0
30
60
90
120 150 180
c.m. [deg]
2000
reaction [mb]
reaction [mb]
2000
1500
63
1000
500
d + Cu
Bearpark et al. (1965)
Dubar et al (1974)
ACSELAM
Daehnick et al.
TALYS - default-OMPKD
1500
65
1000
500
present work
20
40
Ed [MeV]
Bearpark et al. (1965)
Dubar et al. (1974)
ACSELAM
Daehnick et al.
TALYS - default-OMPKD
TALYS - default-R
TALYS - default-R
0
d + Cu
60
0
0
present work
20
40
Ed [MeV]
60
Figure 5. Comparison of experimental [10] and calculated elastic-scattering angular distributions (top)
and experimental [10] and calculated total reaction cross sections (bottom) for d+ 63,65Cu.
3. Calculation of deuteron activation cross-sections of 54,56Fe, 63,65Cu, 93Nb up to 50 MeV
A supplementary aim of this work has been the calculation of deuteron-induced
activation cross-sections for Fe, Cu and Nb stable isotopes by using (i) the deuteron average
energy-dependent phenomenological OMP following the above-mentioned analysis,
within (ii) the direct reaction, pre-equilibrium emission (PE) and Hauser-Feshbach (HF)
statistical-model computer codes TALYS [13] and EMPIRE-II [14].
132 Atentie
0
10
nat
3
Cu(d,d0)
d/d [mb/sr]
/Rutherford
2006 Annual Report of the EURATOM-MEdC Association
11.8 MeV
Igo+ (1961)
Daehnick et al.
present work
-1
10
(a)
0
15 MeV
10
10
11.8 MeV
Jahr+ (1961)
2
10
1
10
0
(c)
10
4
21.6 MeV
10
Jolly+ (1963)
Yntema (1959)
2
10
-1
10
0
10
(b)
-2
10
0
(d)
30
60
90 120 150 180
c.m. [deg]
0
30
60
90
120 150 180
c.m. [deg]
R (mb)
2000
1500
nat
d+
1000
Cu
Mayo+ (1965)
Bearpark et al. (1965)
Daehnick et al.
present work
ACSELAM-library
500
0
20
(e)
40
60
Ed (MeV)
Figure 6. As for Fig. 5, but for the natural Cu target.
10
93
0
15 MeV
Nb(d,d0)
/Rutherford
11.8 MeV
-1
10
10
Igo+ (1961)
OMP Daehnick et al.
OMP Bojowald et al.
present work
TALYS-default OMPKD
Jolly+ (1963)
0
34.4 MeV
52 MeV
-1
10
-2
10
Newman+ (1967)
0
30
60
90
Hinterberger+ (1968)
120
150
0
30
60
90
120
150
180
reaction [mb]
c.m. [deg]
2000
1500
93
d + Nb
Daehnick et al.
Bojowald et al.
present work
TALYS - default OMPKD
1000
500
0
0
TALYS - default R
ACSELAM
20
40
60
Ed [MeV]
Figure 7. As for Fig. 4, but for the natural 93Nb target nucleus, while no total reaction data exist.
133
2006 Annual Report of the EURATOM-MEC Association
54
55
Fe(d,n) Co [7/2- 17.5H]
400
Zaman+ (1993)
Tao Zhenlan++ (1983)
Coetzee+ (1972)
ACSELAM
TALYS
TALYS + OMP-A
EMPIRE
EMPIRE + OMP-A
200
56
800
56
Fe(d,2n) Co
[4+ 77.2D]
Takacs+ (2001)
Sudar+ (1994)
Tao Zhenlan+ (1983)
ACSELAM
TALYS
TALYS + OMP-A
EMPIRE
EMPIRE + OMP-A
600
400
200
0
200
10
20
30
40
50
400
[6+ 5.6D]
150
100
0
54
52g
Fe(d,a)
Mn
56
Zaman+ (1996)
Tao Zhenlan+ (1983)
Baron+ (1963)
54
Fe(d,) Mn
300
[3+ 312.2D]
 [mb]
50
Sudar+ (1994)
200
0
100
54
52m
Fe(d,a)
Mn
80
100
[2+ 21.2M]
Zaman+ (2003)
60
0
40
0
10
20
30
56
40
Fe(d,2p)
56
Mn
[3+ 2.6H]
0
2
50
50
20
10
40
54
53
Fe(d,t) Fe
30
[7/2- 8.5M]
20
1
10
10
Baron+ (1963)
0
10
0
10
Zaman+ (2003)
-1
10
0
10
20
30
40
20
30
40
50
Ed (MeV)
50
Ed (MeV)
Figure 8. Comparison of the experimental [10], ACSELAM data [12] (dot-dashed curves), and calculated
deuteron-induced reaction cross sections for the 54,56Fe target nuclei using the TALYS and EMPIRE-II
codes with default input parameters (dashed and dash-dot-dotted curves, respectively) and the deuteron
phenomenological OMP-A (solid and dotted curves, respectively).
These cross-section calculations were carried on by using the corresponding global
input parameter sets excepting the deuteron OMP. On the other hand, we have also compared
the results thus obtained with those provided by the default OMP of TALYS and EMPIRE-II
codes, i.e. a simplification of folding approach of Watanabe [15] and the nucleon OMP of
Koning and Delaroche [16], for the former, and Perey and Perey [9] for the latter. Other useful
comparisons for the effects of various deuteron OMPs took into account the widely used
deuteron parameter sets of Daehnick et al. [7] and Lohr and Haeberli [8]. At the same time,
134 Atentie
2006 Annual Report of the EURATOM-MEdC Association
the results shown by notation TALYS in Figs. 8-11 are obtained by means of the keyword
‘spherical’ in order to enforce a spherical OMP calculation, leading to the treatment of the
direct inelastic scattering by the DWBA method, while the default option is the opposite one.
We used also particularly a changed keyword ‘sysreaction’ with respect to the default option,
as the authors [13] recommended for a high-quality for complex particles, since otherwise the
reaction cross section for deuterons as complex particles would be taken from systematic
of
non-elastic cross sections based on empirical expressions. It is similarly important for deuteroninduced reactions that the EMPIRE-II version 2.19 offers the advantage of using the exciton PE
model for cluster emission.
1600
1600
non (mb)
1200
1200
d+
54
Fe
56
d+
800
Fe
800
Brown et al. (1973)
ACSELAM
TALYS
TALYS + OMP-A
400
0
0
non
3
10
54
55
54
Fe
53
Fe
3
d + Fe
Mn
Brown et al. (1973)
ACSELAM
TALYS
TALYS + OMP-A
400
10
non
57
55
54
Co
52
2
10
56
Co
56
Fe
55
d + Fe
Fe
Co
54
Mn
57
53
50
Cr
51
55
53
Cr
2
10
49
Mn
53
Co
Cr
50
54
Fe
Mn
Mn
51
52
Mn
V
56
49
54
Fe
Fe
Mn
51
56
Cr
Cr
Cr
55
Mn
Co
V
53
Cr
54
1
1
10
52
48
 (mb)
52
10
47
V
47
49
Fe
V
46
Ti
50
48
52
Cr
V
V
Ti
0
V
Ti
0
10
10
10
n
p

3
3
10
n
p
d + Fe
a
2

54
56
d + Fe
a
2
10
10
d
d
t
t
1
1
10
10
h
h
0
10
Mn
0
0
10
20
30
40
50
10
10
20
30
40
50
Ed [MeV]
Figure 9. Comparison of the experimental [10], ACSELAM data [12] (dot-dashed curves), and calculated
non-elastic cross sections for the 54,56Fe target nuclei (top) by using the TALYS code with default input
parameters (dashed) and the deuteron phenomenological optical potential OMP-A (solid), as well as
residual nuclei production due to deuterons on 54,56Fe (middle), and total particle production cross
sections (bottom) obtained by using the code TALYS and the optical potential OMP-A.
135
2006 Annual Report of the EURATOM-MEC Association
2000
non (mb)
1500
63
d + Cu
1000
65
d + Cu
Dubar+ (1974)
Bearpark+ (1965)
500
Dubar+ (1974)
Bearpark+ (1965)
TALYS-0.64+
TALYS-0.64/OMP-A
EMPIRE-II.19/OMP-D
EMPIRE-II.19/OMP-A
0
non
63
63
1000
Cu
62
Cu
d + Cu
61
Ni
63
TALYS-0.64+
TALYS-0.64/OMP-A
Ni
65
60
Ni
62
Zn
65
66
Cu
 (mb)
64
100
Zn
Zn
Cu
64
d + Cu
Cu
61
Ni
Co
Co
Ni
Co
63
60
58
Cu
Ni
66
63
62
Zn
Cu
Ni
Zn
63
Ni
61
Cu
64
Ni
57
56
Fe
60
Fe
60
25
Co
57
Mn
61
61
61
Fe
Zn
55
Fe
62
1

 (mb)
n
non
p

Co
58
Co
Fe
62
Fe
Zn
58
Co
p
a
d
d
t
h
10
h
65
63
d + Cu
d + Cu
0
Co
non
t
1
59
Co
n
a
100
Cu
57
Cu
1000
non
Cu
60
Ni
64
10
63
62
62
58
59
64
Zn
61
59
Ni
65
Zn
20
40
60
20
40
60
Ed (MeV)
Figure 10. As for Fig. 9, but for the 63,65Cu target nuclei.
Firstly, one may note the rather identical non-elastic cross sections of deuterons
provided by the both TALYS and EMPIRE-II codes as well as by SCAT2 within the OMP
analyses described within the sections 3 and 4, which proves also the correctness of using the
present OMP within the two computer codes.
This increased agreement between the experimental data and the model predictions of
the computer codes TALYS and EMPIRE-II obtained by using the optical potential developed
within the present work, and global assumptions and values for the rest of input parameters,
is able to support the calculated activation cross sections in spite of the actual scarce data basis.
New measurements of these reaction cross sections may provide further evidence in this respect.
136 Atentie
2006 Annual Report of the EURATOM-MEdC Association
93
2
Nb(d,2n)
10
93m
93
Mo
d + Nb
2000
reaction [mb]
[10.5+ 6.85h]
1
 [mb]
10
0
10
1500
1000
Ditroi+ (2000)
TALYS - default exp.syst. R
500
TALYS - default OMPKD
-1
10
Daehnick et al.
present work
ACSELAM
TALYS default OMPKD
TALYS - OMP present work
EMPIRE - OMP present work
0
10
20
30
40
50
TALYS default exp. syst. R
0
60
reaction
3
Ed [MeV]
10
92
93
93
Mo
91
Mo
92
Nb
90
91
93
2
10
Mo
90
Nb
Mo
Nb
89
94
d+ Nb
Nb
88
Zr
Zr
Zr
88
94
Nb
90
1
91
10
93
 [mb]
87
Y
89
Nb
Zr
89
92
Mo
Y
Zr
85
Y
Zr
86
0
10
Sr
84
Sr
Sr
n

3
10
p
a
2
10
d
t
h
1
10
93
d+ Nb
0
10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Ed [MeV]
Figure 11. As for Figs. 8- 9, but for the 93Nb target nucleus.
6. Conclusions
The angular distributions of the elastic-scattered deuterons on 54,56,58Fe target nuclei
have been analyzed by using also the double-folding model for the microscopic optical potential
calculation, and lastly energy-dependent OPMs up to 50 Mev have been obtained. Next, the
comparison between the elastic angular distributions calculated with the deuteron global
potentials and those obtained from the present OMPs proved the latter as most reliable. Finally,
these OMPs have been involved in calculations of activation cross-section of deuterons incident
on 54,56Fe target nuclei, performed by using the well-known computer codes TALYS and
EMPIRE-II and replacing their default OMP options for deuterons. Comparison of the
corresponding results as well as with those following the use of earlier widely-used global OMP
parameter sets is finally proved able to support the calculated activation cross sections in this
work, in spite of the actual scarce data basis. As a global result of this analysis one may note
2006 Annual Report of the EURATOM-MEC Association
137
differences of about 10% between the present improved results and those obtained by using the
default input parameters within the code TALYS. The differences with respect to the evaluated
data of the ACSELEM library are about 25%.
One of the authors (F.L.R.) acknowledges the hospitality of the Atominstitut (AI) der
Osterreichischen Universitaeten, Technische Universitaet Wien (TUW) during a staff-mobility
visit at the Association EURATOM/OAW in the period 2006.10.15-2006.12.15, for working
together with Prof. Helmut Leeb on the research topic “Microscopic optical potentials for
deuteron interaction with accelerator materials”. The results of this co-operation are shown in
the Section 2 of this report, and they may represent the basis for a project for enhancing mutual
co-operations between Associations 2006 entitled “Optical Potentials for Light Ions” in the
framework of the envisaged EFDA-project at AI/TUW on covariance determination for 16O.
References
[1] Avrigeanu M, von Oertzen W., Fischer U., Avrigeanu V., “Analysis of deuteron elastic
scattering on 6,7Li up to 50 MeV”, Nucl. Phys. A759 (2005) 327.
[2] Avrigeanu M., von Oertzen W., Fischer U., and Avrigeanu V., “Analysis of Deuterium
scattering on 6,7Li up to 50 MeV based on realistic effective NN interaction”, in Nuclear Data
for Science and Technology, R.C. Haight, M.B. Chadwick, T. Kawano, and P. Talou (Eds.),
AIP Conf. Proc. No. 769 (2005) 99.
[3] Avrigeanu M., Anagnostatos G.S., Antonov A.N., Giapitzakis J., “On dynamics of
two-neutron transfer reactions with the Borromean nucleus 6He”,Phys. Rev.C 62 (2000)
017001.
[4] Avrigeanu M., Antonov A.N., Lenske H., Stetcu I., “Effective interactions for multistep
processes”, Nucl. Phys. A693 (2001) 616.
[5] Avrigeanu M., von Oertzen W., Plompen A.J.M., Avrigeanu V., “Optical model
potentials for -particles scattering around the Coulomb barrier on A~100 nuclei”, Nucl. Phys.
A723 (2003) 104.
[6]. Bersillon O., Centre d'Etudes de Bruyeres-le-Chatel, Note CEA-N-2227, 1992.
[7] Daehnick W.W., Childs J.D., Vrcelj Z., Phys. Rev. C 21 (1980) 2253.
[8] Lohr J.M., Haeberli W., Nucl. Phys. A232 (1974) 381.
[9] Perey C.M., Perey F.G., Phys. Rev. 132 (1963) 755.
[10] EXFOR Nuclear Reaction Data, http://www-nds.iaea.or.at/exfor , http://www.nndc.bnl.gov
[11] Abbott D., Ahmidouch A., Anklin H., Arvieux J. et. al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 (2000) 5053.
[12] Tanaka S. et al., “Development of IRAC code system to calculate induced radioactivity
produced by ions and neutrons, in Proc. 8th Int. Conf. on Radiation Shielding”, Arlington,
April 1994, ANS, p. 965.
[13] Koning A.J., Hilaire S., Duijvestijn M.C., in: R.C. Haight et al. (Eds.), Proc. Int. Conf.
on Nuclear Data for Science and Technology, 2004, Santa Fe, AIP Conf. Proc. No. 769
(American Institute of Physics, New York, 2005), p. 1154.
[14] Herman M., Oblozinsky P., Capote R., Sin M., Trkov A., Ventura A., Zerkin V.,
in: R.C. Haight, M.B. Chadwick, T. Kawano and P. Talou (Eds.), Proc. Int. Conf. on Nuclear
138 Atentie
2006 Annual Report of the EURATOM-MEdC Association
Data for Science and Technology (ND2004), 26 Sept. - 1 Oct. 2004, Santa Fe, New Mexico
(AIP, New York, 2005), p. 1184; EMPIRE-II v.2.19, http://www-nds.iaea.org/empire/.
[15] Watanabe S., Nucl. Phys. 8 (1958) 484.
[16] Koning A.J., Delaroche, J.P., Nucl. Phys. A 713 (2003) 231.