Jim Shipley & Associates District Self-Assessment Deployment Strategies The following examples of field-tested strategies should be considered, or alternative strategies identified, in developing a written deployment plan. Leadership Awareness and Commitment Senior leaders (superintendent, cabinet, board members, division administrators, employee association leadership) participate in an orientation to a systems approach to continuous improvement in preparation for leading a district-wide Baldrige-based improvement effort. The district has formally adopted the systems approach to performance excellence and implementation architecture, and all leaders understand their role in supporting the approach. There is a process in place for orienting new school and department leaders to the district priorities and its continuous improvement approach to achieving those priorities. Partner Development There is a process in place for orienting existing and new partners to district priorities and the continuous improvement approach to achieving those priorities. Strategic Alignment There is a documented strategic planning process for translating federal, state, and community requirements into goals, measures, and action plans for the district. The district goals are posted on the district’s website. Every staff member receives a poster listing the goals and key measures to be posted as visible reminders to students, staff, and parents of the commitment of everyone to achieving these goals. There is a process in place to ensure systematic monitoring and reporting of progress toward district priorities to the board of education, staff, and the community. The district strategic plan includes a timeline for evaluating goals and adjusting strategies. All district-level administrators and principals develop department or site goals and action plans that support the district goals, key measures, values, mission, and vision. © Jim Shipley & Associates, Inc. September 2014 1 Operational Planning and Deployment (Departments and Schools) The department/school improvement plan template and process are based on continuous improvement principles and practices—alignment, use of data, staff engagement, and process improvement. There is a process in place to guide, coach, and support schools in the school improvement planning process. There is a process in place to guide support service departments in the development of deployment plans describing how they will customize roll-out to meet the unique needs of their department. Common expectations for the implementation of continuous improvement principles and practices are integrated into key district processes like the classroom walkthrough guide and employee evaluation criteria. Teachers have received district-provided training in classroom implementation for the purpose of building interest in, and understanding of, a systems approach to continuous improvement. There are objective criteria in place for the recognition of demonstration sites. School and department results are systematically reviewed and incorporated into the results-reporting process to the board and community. Cross-walks, showing how district, department, and/or school initiatives fit in the continuous improvement framework, are easily accessible. Non-instructional support staff have received training in continuous improvement principles and practices for the purpose of building interest in, and understanding of, the district’s improvement approach. Non-instructional work units set goals and measures that align to the district strategic plan and department improvement plan. Key stakeholders have been engaged in the development of a consistent, coherent K-12 curriculum and assessment framework aligned to state standards. Leading High-Performing Systems Administrators receive regular coaching and support in the implementation of continuous improvement principles and practices. Administrators and supervisors use continuous improvement principles and practices to manage meetings and improve key district processes. The performance appraisal process for administrators and supervisors integrates continuous improvement principles and practices into performance expectations. © Jim Shipley & Associates, Inc. September 2014 2 Technical Support Systems Technical support teams are in place to coach and support implementation efforts at the department, school, and classroom level. Role model demonstration sites—schools, classrooms, support service departments—are in place for the purpose of providing staff with visible examples of implementation. Continuous Improvement Classroom Certification Criteria are in place and used to recognize exemplary classrooms. The district’s professional development plan integrates continuous improvement principles and practices into recommended training, coaching, and practice opportunities for staff. Onsite training/coaching/feedback is provided to increase the degree of implementation in schools, classrooms, departments, and work units. Process Improvement and PDSA—Using Improvement Tools and Techniques The use of PDSA cycles is embedded into the department and school improvement format and process. The use of PDSA cycles is embedded into the classroom observation and walkthrough format and process. There is a system of short-cycle predictive assessments in place to support school and classroom PDSA cycles of improvement. System Assessment The cabinet/district leadership team uses the Systems Check process on a regular basis to determine system strengths and opportunities for improvement. The school board uses the Systems Check process on a regular basis to determine system strengths and opportunities for improvement. Education operations departments and business operations departments use the Systems Check process on a regular basis to determine system strengths and opportunities for improvement. Schools use the Systems Check process on a regular basis to determine system strengths and opportunities for improvement. Classroom teachers use the Systems Check process on a regular basis to determine system strengths and opportunities for improvement. The district uses an external system assessment process: Jim Shipley & Associatesfacilitated assessment process, state quality award process, and/or national quality award process to validate system strengths and opportunities for improvement. © Jim Shipley & Associates, Inc. September 2014 3