LINCOLN-PETERSEN ESTIMATES FOR CLOSED POPULATIONS AND JOLLY-SEBER ESTIMATES FOR OPEN POPULATIONS 1. Lincoln-Petersen estimates of population size are based on a simple ratio and depend on the assumption that the population is closed to emigration, immigration, births or mortality during the sampling period. If we capture and mark a sample of individuals, then release them and after they mix with the entire population we can estimate the size of the entire population using the following equation: N C , M m where N is our estimate of population size at the time of the original sample, M is the number of individuals released on the first occasion, C is the size of the second sample we capture and m is the number of marked animals in the second sample. This formula is intuitive; the ratio of total population size to the number of marked individuals in the original sample should be the same as the ratio of the size of the second sample to the number of marked individuals in the second sample. a. Remove 40 beans from your jar and mark each of the beans you remove with a black mark. Replace the beans and thoroughly mix them. Remove a second sample of 40 and record the number of marked beans in your second sample. Estimate the size of your population using the above equation. M 1C 1 1 . Calculate this The unbiased estimate of N is: Nˆ m 1 m estimate. One estimate for the confidence intervals for the ratio C (proportional to N ), is given by m m m 1 f C 1 C z C C 1 1 . 2C Where f is the ratio m/M, i.e., the proportion of the population sampled in the second sample. z is 1.96 for p = 0.05. Calculate the confidence interval for your estimate of N . b. Replace the beans you used in experiment a. Draw a sample of 80 beans and mark them with a red mark. Replace these beans and draw a second sample of 80. Repeat the calculations form part a. How does the estimate and its precision compare with those of part a? 2. We’re going to perform a simple capture-recapture experiment using the JollySeber method for open populations. We’ll simulate mortality by removing beans between samples. We will base our estimates on five samples of 30 each. Because the Jolly-Seber approach requires more detailed information about the pattern of captures it is necessary to individually mark beans. So, place a unique marker on each bean in each sample before you place it back into the “population”. Once a bean is uniquely marked it doesn’t need to be marked again. a. Remove a sample of 30 beans and mark each one with a unique number. Replace these beans, mix thoroughly and remove 10 beans to simulate mortality. Draw a second sample of 30, record the beans that were previously marked and mark each of the new beans with a unique number. Return the sample to the population, mix and remove the 10 “mortalities”. Repeat this process three more times for a total of five samples. We’re going to want to produce an M array like the one we saw in class. Time of last capture 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Total marked (mt) Total unmarked (ut) Total caught (nt) Total relaeased (st) 2 15 3 1 15 4 0 0 37 Time of Capture 5 6 7 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 61 4 1 75 3 77 m6 8 0 0 0 1 2 4 69 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14 76 15 91 90 8 11 19 19 15 12 27 26 R6 0 22 22 21 15 26 41 41 16 32 48 46 37 45 82 82 64 25 89 88 79 81 22 26 101 107 99 106 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 19 3 22 22 We need to produce a capture history for each individual we capture. These will look like the following: Z6 Individual 1 2 3 4 5 … 40 41 History 10111 11011 10000 11001 10011 … 00011 00010 We can use the pattern of captures to calculate the values in the m array. For example of the individuals captured on occasion one, two were recaptured on occasion two, one was recaptured first on occasion three, and one was first recaptured on occasion four. Two individuals were released on occasion two, etc. Use your capture histories to produce an m-array and use the formulas below to calculate number of marked individuals: s 1Z t m . Mˆ t t Rt 1 Estimate population size as: population that is marked. M N , where is the estimate of the proportion of the