Full Text (Accepted Manuscript , 233kb)

advertisement
1
Word count text: 3597; Word count abstract: 250;
Number of references: 45;
Tables: 5; Figures: 0; Supplementary Figure: 1;
Supplementary Tables: 2.
Maternal educational level and blood pressure, aortic stiffness,
cardiovascular structure and functioning in childhood: The Generation R
Study
Running title: Maternal education and cardiovascular outcomes
Selma H. BOUTHOORN MDa,b, Frank J. VAN LENTHE PhDb, Layla L. DE JONGE MDa,c,d,
Albert HOFMAN MD PhDa,c , Lennie VAN OSCH-GEVERS, MD, PhDd, Vincent WV
JADDOE MD PhDa,c,d, Hein RAAT MD PhDb
a
The Generation R Study Group, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands;
b
c
Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Centre, the Netherlands;
Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands;
d
Department of Pediatrics, Erasmus Medical Centre, the Netherlands.
Corresponding author
Selma H. Bouthoorn MD. The Generation R Study Group, Erasmus MC, University Medical
Centre Rotterdam. P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Telephone: +31
(0)10-704 38496; fax: +31 (0)10 704 4645; e-mail: s.bouthoorn@erasmusmc.nl.
Conflict of interest: None
2
Abstract
1
Background: In adults, low level of education was shown to be associated with higher blood
2
pressure levels and alterations in cardiac structures and function. It is currently unknown
3
whether socioeconomic inequalities in arterial and cardiac alterations originate in childhood.
4
Therefore, we investigated the association of maternal education with blood pressure levels,
5
arterial stiffness and cardiac structures and function at the age of 6 years, and potential
6
underlying factors.
7
Methods: The study included 5843 children participating in a prospective cohort study in the
8
Netherlands. Maternal education was assessed at enrollment. Blood pressure, carotid-femoral
9
pulse wave velocity, left atrial diameter, aortic root diameter, left ventricular mass and
10
fractional shortening were measured at the age of 6 years.
11
Results: Children with low educated (category 1) mothers had higher systolic (2.80 mm Hg,
12
95% CI: 1.62-2.94) and diastolic (1.80 mm Hg, 95% CI: 1.25-2.35) blood pressure levels as
13
compared to children with high educated (category 4) mothers. The main explanatory factors
14
were the child’s BMI, maternal BMI and physical activity. Maternal education was negatively
15
associated with fractional shortening (p for trend 0.008), to which blood pressure and child’s
16
BMI contributed the most. No socioeconomic gradient was observed in other arterial and
17
cardiac measurements.
18
Conclusion: Socioeconomic inequalities in blood pressure are already present in childhood.
19
Higher fractional shortening among children from low socioeconomic families might be a
20
first cardiac adaptation to higher blood pressure and higher BMI. Interventions should be
21
aimed at lowering child BMI and increasing physical activity among children from low
22
socioeconomic families.
3
23
Keywords: Maternal educational level, blood pressure, cardiac structures, cardiac function,
24
arterial stiffness, childhood
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
4
42
Introduction
43
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death in most western parts of the world.
44
Low socioeconomic position (SEP) has been recognized as a marked risk factor in the
45
occurrence of CVD among adults (1, 2). A better understanding of the origins and underlying
46
mechanisms of socioeconomic inequalities in CVD is essential to develop effective strategies
47
aimed at preventing or reducing these inequalities. Growing evidence suggest that CVD
48
inequalities arise already in childhood, since several CVD risk factors including, low birth
49
weight, short gestational age, physical inactivity, childhood obesity and familial hypertension,
50
affect children from low socioeconomic families more frequently (3-5). These risk factors
51
may cause inequalities in blood pressure levels in childhood, and may track into adulthood (6).
52
Indeed, a recent study showed socioeconomic inequalities in blood pressure to appear at the
53
age of 5-6 years old already, mediated by known CVD risk factors including birth weight,
54
childhood BMI and maternal BMI (7).
55
Alterations in arterial and cardiac structures such as aortic stiffness, aortic root size, left atrial
56
and left ventricular enlargement, contribute to the risk of CVD among adults (8-11). In adults,
57
it has been shown previously that a low level of education was associated with left ventricular
58
hypertrophy, left ventricular dilatation and cardiac dysfunction (12). Factors recognized to
59
influence these structures include elevated blood pressure levels and obesity (12-15). These
60
factors are more common in children from low SEP families and were also found to cause a
61
higher left ventricular mass in childhood already (16, 17). However, no previous study
62
examined the socioeconomic gradient in early structural changes of the heart among children.
63
Therefore, to improve the understanding of the origins and underlying mechanisms of CVD
64
inequalities, we investigated in a population-based, prospective cohort study, the association
65
between maternal educational level and blood pressure levels, arterial stiffness and cardiac
5
66
structures and function at the age of 6 years. Furthermore, we examined whether adiposity
67
measures, lifestyle-related determinants and birth characteristics could explain these
68
associations.
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
6
85
Methods
86
Study design
87
This study is embedded within the Generation R Study, a population-based prospective cohort
88
study from early pregnancy onwards described in detail elsewhere (18). Enrolment was aimed
89
at early pregnancy, but was allowed until the birth of the child. All children were born
90
between April 2002 and January 2006 and form a prenatally enrolled birth-cohort that is
91
currently being followed-up until young adulthood. The study was conducted in accordance
92
with the guidelines proposed in the World Medical Association of Helsinki and has been
93
approved by the Medical Ethical Committee of the Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre
94
Rotterdam. Written consent was obtained from all participating parents (19).
95
Study group
96
In total, 8305 children still participate in the study from the age of 5 years (18). The
97
participating children and their mothers were invited to a well-equipped and dedicated
98
research center in the Erasmus Medical Center - Sophia Children’s Hospital between March
99
2008 and January 2012. Measurements were focused on several health outcomes including
100
body composition, obesity, heart and vascular development and behaviour and cognition (18).
101
In total, 6690 children visited the research center. Mothers of children who didn’t visit the
102
research center had a lower educational level, more frequently smoked during pregnancy
103
(p<0.001) and fewer of them gave breastfeeding (p=0.001) as compared to mothers of
104
children who visited the research center. No differences were found in other characteristics
105
between these groups (Supplementary Table S1). We excluded twins (n=167) and participants
106
who lacked information on maternal educational level (n=594) and on cardiovascular
107
measurements (n=50). Furthermore, children with echocardiographic evidence of congenital
7
108
heart disease or kidney disease were excluded (n=36), leaving a study population of 5843
109
children (Supplementary Figure S1).
110
Maternal educational level
111
Our indicator of SEP was educational level of the mother. Level of maternal education was
112
established using questionnaires at enrollment. The Dutch Standard Classification of
113
Education was used to categorize 4 subsequent levels of education: 1. high (university degree),
114
2. mid-high (higher vocational training, Bachelor’s degree), 3. mid-low (>3 years general
115
secondary school, intermediate vocational training) and 4. low (no education, primary school,
116
lower vocational training, intermediate general school, or 3 years or less general secondary
117
school) (20).
118
Child cardiovascular structures and function
119
We measured blood pressure with the child in supine position quietly awake. Systolic and
120
diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP) was measured at the right brachial artery, four times
121
with one minute intervals, using the validated automatic sphygmanometer Datascope Accutor
122
Plus TM (Paramus, NJ, USA) (21). A cuff was selected with a cuff width approximately 40%
123
of the arm circumference and long enough to cover 90% of the arm circumference. More than
124
90% of the children who visited the research center had four successful blood pressure
125
measurements available. SBP and DBP were determined by excluding the first measurement
126
and averaging the other measurements.
127
Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity, the reference method to assess aortic stiffness (11), was
128
assessed using the automatic Complior device (Complior; Artech Medical, Pantin, France)
129
with participants in supine position. The distance between the recording sites at the carotid
130
(proximal) and femoral (distal) artery was measured over the surface of the body to the
8
131
nearest centimeter. Through piezoelectric sensors placed on the skin, the device collected
132
signals to assess the time delay between the pressure upstrokes in the carotid artery and the
133
femoral artery. Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity was calculated as the ratio of the distance
134
travelled by the pulse wave and the time delay between the feet of the carotid and femoral
135
pressure waveforms, as expressed in meters per second (22). To cover a complete respiratory
136
cycle, the mean of at least 10 consecutive pressure waveforms was used in the analyses.
137
Recently, it has been shown that pulse wave velocity can be measured reliably, with good
138
reproducibility in a large pediatric population-based cohort (23).
139
Two-dimensional M-mode echocardiographic measurements were performed using the ATL-
140
Philips Model HDI 5000 (Seattle, WA, USA) or the Logiq E9 (GE Medical Systems,
141
Wauwatosa, WI, USA) devices. The children were examined in a quiet room with the child
142
awake in supine position. Missing echocardiograms were mainly due to restlessness of the
143
child or unavailability of equipment or sonographer. Left atrial diameter, interventricular end-
144
diastolic septal thickness (IVSTD), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), left
145
ventricular end-diastolic posterior wall thickness (LVPWTD), interventricular end-systolic
146
septal thickness, left ventricular end-systolic diameter, left ventricular end-systolic posterior
147
wall thickness, aortic root diameter, and fractional shortening were measured using methods
148
recommended by the American Society of Echocardiography (24). Left ventricular mass (LV
149
mass) was computed using the formula derived by Devereux et al (25):LV mass = 0.80 ×
150
1.04((IVSTD + LVEDD + LVPWTD)3 − (LVEDD) 3)+ 0.6. To assess reproducibility of
151
ultrasound measurements, the intraobserver and interobserver intraclass correlation
152
coefficients were calculated previously for left atrial diameter, aortic root diameter, IVSTD,
153
LVEDD and LVPWTD in 28 subjects (median age 7.5 years, interquartile range 3.0-11.0) and
154
varied between 0.91 to 0.99 and 0.78 to 0.96, respectively (26).
9
155
Explanatory variables
156
The following factors were considered to be potential explanatory factors in the pathway
157
between SEP and blood pressure, cardiovascular structures and function. These were chosen
158
based on previous literature (7, 27-30).
159
Maternal characteristics
160
Information on pre-pregnancy weight, pre-pregnancy hypertension (yes, no) and smoking
161
during pregnancy (no, until confirmed pregnancy and continued during pregnancy) and
162
financial difficulties, as indicator of family stress, was obtained by questionnaires. Also,
163
another measurement of family stress was assessed with the family assessment device score at
164
age 5. A higher score reflects more ‘stress’. Information on pregnancy-induced hypertension
165
and preeclampsia was obtained from medical records. Women suspected of pregnancy
166
hypertensive complications, based on these records, were crosschecked with the original
167
hospital charts. Details of these procedures have been described elsewhere (31). Maternal
168
height was measured during visits at our research center. On the basis of height and pre-
169
pregnancy weight, we calculated pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) (weight/height2).
170
Birth characteristics
171
Birth weight and gestational age at birth were obtained from midwife and hospital registries.
172
Information on breastfeeding during infancy (ever/never) was obtained by questionnaires.
173
Child characteristics
174
Weight of the child was measured while wearing lightweight clothes and without shoes by
175
using a mechanical personal scale (SECA), and height was measured by a Harpenden
176
stadiometer (Holtain Limited) in standing position, which were both calibrated on a regular
10
177
basis. BMI was calculated using the formula; weight (kg) / height (m)2. Standard-deviation
178
scores (SDS) adjusted for age and gender were constructed for these growth measurements
179
(32). Watching television (< 2 hours/day, ≥ 2 hours/day), as indicator of sedentary behaviour,
180
and playing sports (yes/no), as indicator of physical activity, were obtained from
181
questionnaires at the age of 5 years.
182
Confounding variables
183
Gender and date of birth of the child were obtained from midwife and hospital registries.
184
Ethnicity (Dutch, other western, non-western) was obtained from the first questionnaire at
185
enrollment in the study. These factors were considered as potential confounding factors.
186
Statistical analyses
187
First, univariate associations of maternal educational level to all covariates, blood pressure,
188
carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity, cardiac structures and function were explored using Chi-
189
square tests and ANOVAs. Second, we assessed the association of maternal educational level
190
with blood pressure levels, carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity, cardiac structures and
191
function using linear regression models adjusted for the potential confounders (model 1). To
192
evaluate the mediating effects of all potential explanatory factors Baron and Kenny’s causal
193
step approach was used (33). Only those factors that were significantly associated with the
194
outcome (independent of maternal educational level; data available upon request) and
195
unequally distributed across SEP groups (Table 1) were added separately to model 1 (33). To
196
assess their mediating effects, the corresponding percentages of attenuation of effect estimates
197
were calculated by comparing differences of model 1 with the adjusted ones (100 x (B model 1 –
198
B model 1 with
199
level and all the explanatory factors assessed the joint effects of the explanatory factors. The
explanatory factor)
/ (B model 1 )). Finally, a full model containing maternal educational
11
200
explanatory mechanisms were investigated only for outcomes (blood pressure, pulse wave
201
velocity, cardiac structures and function) that differed by maternal educational level after
202
adjustment for confounders (model 1). Interaction terms between maternal educational level
203
and child’s sex on all the outcomes were not significant (p>0.1); therefore analyses were not
204
stratified for sex. Multiple imputation was used to deal with the missing values in the
205
covariates. Five imputed datasets were created and analysed together. A 95% confidence
206
interval (CI) was calculated around the percentage attenuation using a bootstrap method with
207
1000 re-samplings per imputed dataset in the statistical program R (34). All the other
208
statistical analyses were performed using Statistical Package of Social Science (SPSS) version
209
20.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA).
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
12
220
Results
221
222
Table 1 shows the characteristics of the study population. Of all participating children 22.4%
223
(n= 1308) had mothers with a low educational level and 25.3% (n=1483) of the mothers were
224
high educated. Compared with mothers with a high education, those with a low education had
225
a higher pre-pregnancy BMI, suffered more frequently from pre-pregnancy hypertension, had
226
more financial difficulties and a higher family assessment device score (p<0.001), indicating
227
more stress within their families, fewer of them gave breastfeeding, and they more frequently
228
smoked during pregnancy (p=0.002). Their children were on average lighter at birth and had
229
a shorter gestational duration (p<0.001). Mothers with a high education were more frequently
230
Dutch, while mothers with a low education had more frequently a non-western ethnic
231
background (p<0.001). Children of low educated mothers less frequently played sports,
232
watched more frequently ≥ 2 hours television per day and were heavier as compared with
233
children of high educated mothers (p<0.001). Mean systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood
234
pressure (DBP) levels (p<0.001) and carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (p=0.02) were
235
negatively associated with level of education. Also, left atrial diameter (p<0.001) and left
236
ventricular mass (p=0.003) differed according to educational level (Table 1).
237
Multivariable linear regression analyses adjusted for the potential confounders showed that
238
the lower the education of the mother, the higher the systolic and diastolic blood pressure of
239
their children (p for trend <0.001) (Table 2). No consistent associations of maternal education
240
were observed with carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity, aortic root diameter, left atrial
241
diameter, and left ventricular mass. Fractional shortening was negatively associated with
242
maternal educational level (p for trend 0.008). There was no interaction between ethnicity and
243
maternal education on these outcomes (p > 0.05).
13
244
Maternal pre-pregnancy BMI, maternal pre-pregnancy hypertension, gestational age, and the
245
child’s height and BMI were related both to maternal educational level and SBP. The selected
246
explanatory factors for DBP included maternal pre-pregnancy hypertension, birth weight,
247
watching television, playing sports, and the child’s height and BMI. Birth weight, child’s
248
BMI, SBP and DBP were the selected explanatory factors in the association between maternal
249
education and fractional shortening. For each selected factor, an interaction with maternal
250
education was tested for significance, none of them were significant (p > 0.05).
251
Regarding the proportion of explanation by each risk factor (Table 3 and Table 4), the child’s
252
BMI was the most important contributor to the association of maternal education to SBP in
253
the mid-low and low educational subgroup (15% attenuation (95% CI: -29% to -7%) and 29%
254
(95% CI: -42% to -20%) ). Secondly, maternal pre-pregnancy BMI contributed to the
255
association between maternal education and SBP accounting for 11% (95% CI: -22% to -6%)
256
and 12% (95% CI: -18% to -7%) respectively. Overall, 12% (95% CI: -26% to 0.3%) and
257
24% (95% CI: -36% to -14%) of the association of maternal education and SBP was
258
explained for mid-low and low education by including the explanatory factors (Table 3). For
259
DBP, the child’s BMI and playing sports were the most contributing factors in the association
260
between maternal education and DBP, explaining 8% (95% CI: -14% to -3%) and 7% (95%
261
CI: -13% to -3%) in the lowest educational subgroup. The overall explanation was 12% (95%
262
CI: -47% to -3%), 16% (95% CI: -30% to -8%) and 21% (95% CI: -35% to -12%) in the mid-
263
high, mid-low and low educational subgroup respectively (Table 4). For both SBP and DBP
264
the socioeconomic differences remained significant after including all the explanatory factors
265
(Table 3 and Table 4). Complete elimination of the association of mid-low and low education
266
with fractional shortening was observed after individual adjustment for BMI, SBP and DBP.
14
267
SBP was the most contributing factor, explaining 27% (95% CI: -142% to 25%) and 42%
268
(95% CI: -159% to -12%) respectively (Table 5).
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
15
286
Discussion
287
This study shows that socioeconomic inequalities in adult CVD may have their origins in
288
childhood. We found socioeconomic inequalities in systolic and diastolic blood pressure to
289
occur already at the age of 6 years. Furthermore, a positive association was found between
290
maternal education and fractional shortening, which was explained by higher blood pressure
291
levels and a higher BMI among children of lower educated mothers. We did not find evidence
292
for socioeconomic inequalities in carotid- femoral pulse wave velocity, aortic root diameter,
293
left atrial diameter, and left ventricular mass at the age of 6 years.
294
Methodological considerations
295
The strengths of this study are the prospective population-based design and the availability of
296
many important covariates that may explain the association between maternal education,
297
blood pressure levels, and cardiac structures and function. In addition, we had a large sample
298
size of 5843 participants and the availability of several cardiovascular measurements in most
299
of these children.
300
To various extents, our results may have been influenced by the following limitations. We
301
used maternal educational level as indicator of SEP. Maternal education may reflect general
302
and health-related knowledge, health behavior, health literacy and problem-solving skills (35,
303
36). Furthermore, it has been shown that education is the strongest and most consistent
304
socioeconomic predictor of cardiovascular risk factors (37). It is less clear to what extent it
305
captures the material and financial aspects of the household. We therefore repeated the
306
analyses using household income level as determinant, and we found comparable results with
307
the highest SBP and DBP and the highest fractional shortening in the lowest income group
308
(Supplementary Table S2). Information on various covariates in this study was self-reported,
16
309
which may have resulted in underreporting of certain adverse lifestyle related determinants. In
310
our blood pressure measurements, we were not able to account for circadian rhythm. Yet,
311
while this may have resulted in random error, it seems less likely that bias varied
312
systematically across socioeconomic groups. Although the participation rate in The
313
Generation R Study was relatively high (61%), there was some selection towards a relatively
314
highly educated and more healthy study population (38). Non-participation would have led to
315
selection bias if the associations of maternal educational level with the outcome differed
316
between participants and non-participants. Previous research showed that this bias is minimal
317
(39, 40). However, it cannot be ruled out completely. Finally, unmeasured factors related to
318
both SEP and blood pressure, such as salt intake and psychosocial factors, might explain some
319
of the remaining effect of SEP on blood pressure. Sleep patterns may also explain some of the
320
remaining effect, since this has been associated with cardiovascular health in previous studies
321
(41).
322
Maternal education, blood pressure and cardiac structures and function
323
Previous literature concerning the association between socioeconomic circumstances and
324
blood pressure in childhood is conflicting (7, 42). This might be due to the use of different
325
study designs and different study populations. In line with previous literature we found BMI
326
to be the factor contributing most to the association between maternal education and blood
327
pressure (7). Obesity may cause disturbances in autonomic function, insulin resistance and
328
abnormalities in vascular structure and functions, which in turn may cause elevated blood
329
pressure levels (43). Maternal pre-pregnancy BMI was also an important explanation of the
330
socioeconomic gradient in SBP. Maternal BMI and a child’s BMI are correlated; the effect of
331
maternal BMI may act for an important part through its effect on the child’s BMI. This is
332
supported by our findings which showed that after adjustment for child’s BMI and maternal
17
333
BMI, only child’s BMI remained significant (data not shown). A novel finding of this study is
334
that indicators of sedentary behavior and physical activity, including watching television and
335
playing sports, mediate the association between maternal education on DBP. Although these
336
effects may pass through the effects of the child’s BMI on DBP, its significant association in
337
the fully adjusted model suggests that there is probably also an independent effect of physical
338
activity on DBP, which explains the socioeconomic inequalities in DBP. This is supported by
339
a recent study of Knowles et al. who found higher physical activity to be associated with
340
lower DBP levels among 5-7 year old children, independent of BMI and other markers of
341
adiposity (44). These findings suggest that intervention should be aimed at increasing
342
physical activity, especially among children with a lower SEP.
343
Although children from low SEP families had higher BP levels and a higher BMI which is
344
previously shown to be associated with larger left ventricular mass and atrial enlargement
345
(12-15), we did not find a socioeconomic gradient in cardiac structures at the age of 6 years.
346
We found, however, left ventricular mass to be lower in the mid-high and the mid-low
347
educational subgroup as compared to the high educational subgroup. The direction of the
348
association was not entirely equal to what was expected. Also, no socioeconomic gradient
349
was observed and therefore commonly used cardiovascular risk factors explaining
350
socioeconomic inequalities are not likely to be an explanation. Future research is necessary to
351
replicate these findings. Another remarkable finding was the higher fractional shortening
352
among children with mid-low and low educated mothers. One explanation might be that these
353
children experience more stress during the echocardiographic assessment due to a lower lack
354
of parental support because they, as well as their parents, are more impressed by the
355
measurement setting, resulting in a higher fractional shortening. However, stress would also
356
have increased their heart rate and adjustment for heart rate would then have explained, at
18
357
least to some extent, the association between maternal education and fractional shortening. In
358
our study, this explanation is less likely since heart rate, as indicator of stress, was not
359
associated with fractional shortening. Since an increased fractional shortening was explained
360
by higher blood pressure levels and a higher BMI, another explanation might be that it is the
361
first indication of cardiac adaptation to higher blood pressure levels and higher BMI among
362
low SEP children. However, in a later stage higher blood pressure levels and a higher BMI
363
result in alterations of cardiac structures such as left ventricular and left atrial enlargement
364
(45) , which are associated with a lower fractional shortening. Thus our findings that lower
365
education leads to a higher fractional shortening at the age of 6 are not fully understood and a
366
change finding can also not be excluded. Confirmation in future studies is therefore highly
367
recommended and replication would suggest that cardiac structural alterations can be
368
prevented at this age by lowering blood pressure levels and body weight, especially among
369
children from low socioeconomic families.
370
Conclusion
371
Our study adds to the small body of literature concerning socioeconomic differences in blood
372
pressure and shows that inequalities arise in early childhood which were mainly explained by
373
socio-economic inequalities in the child’s BMI and physical activity. No differences in
374
arterial stiffness or cardiac structures were observed per educational subgroup. However, a
375
socioeconomic gradient in fractional shortening was observed, with children from low SEP
376
families having a higher fractional shortening as compared to children from high SEP families.
377
This might be a first cardiac adaptation to a higher blood pressure and a higher BMI. The
378
results require careful interpretation since the associations were relatively small and the
379
clinical importance not yet fully understood.
19
Supplementary information is available at http://www.oup.com/ajh.
Acknowledgements
The Generation R Study is conducted by the Erasmus Medical Centre in close collaboration
with the Erasmus University Rotterdam, School of Law and Faculty of Social Sciences, the
Municipal Health Service Rotterdam area, Rotterdam, the Rotterdam Homecare Foundation,
Rotterdam, and the Stichting Trombosedienst & Artsenlaboratorium Rijnmond (STAR),
Rotterdam. We gratefully acknowledge the contribution of general practitioners, hospitals,
midwives and pharmacies in Rotterdam. We also thank Wim Helbing for his valuable
comments on an earlier draft of this manuscript.
Funding
The first phase of the Generation R Study is made possible by financial support from:
Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Erasmus University Rotterdam and the Netherlands
Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMw).
Conflict of interest
None
20
References
1.
Mackenbach JP, Cavelaars AE, Kunst AE, Groenhof F. Socioeconomic inequalities in
cardiovascular disease mortality; an international study. Eur Heart J 2000; 21(14):1141-1151.
2.
Hickson DA, Diez Roux AV, Wyatt SB, Gebreab SY, Ogedegbe G, Sarpong DF,
Taylor HA, Wofford MR. Socioeconomic position is positively associated with blood
pressure dipping among African-American adults: the Jackson Heart Study. Am J Hypertens
2011; 24(9):1015-1021.
3.
Peacock JL, Bland JM, Anderson HR. Preterm delivery: effects of socioeconomic
factors, psychological stress, smoking, alcohol, and caffeine. BMJ 1995; 311(7004):531-535.
4.
Drenowatz C, Eisenmann JC, Pfeiffer KA, Welk G, Heelan K, Gentile D, Walsh D.
Influence of socio-economic status on habitual physical activity and sedentary behavior in 8to 11-year old children. BMC Public Health 2010; 10:214.
5.
de Gaudemaris R, Lang T, Chatellier G, Larabi L, Lauwers-Cances V, Maitre A,
Diene E. Socioeconomic inequalities in hypertension prevalence and care: the IHPAF Study.
Hypertension 2002; 39(6):1119-1125.
6.
Kivimaki M, Lawlor DA, Smith GD, Keltikangas-Jarvinen L, Elovainio M, Vahtera J,
Pulkki-Raback L, Taittonen L, Viikari JS, Raitakari OT. Early socioeconomic position and
blood pressure in childhood and adulthood: the Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns Study.
Hypertension 2006; 47(1):39-44.
7.
van den Berg G, van Eijsden M, Galindo-Garre F, Vrijkotte TG, Gemke RJ.
Explaining Socioeconomic Inequalities in Childhood Blood Pressure and Prehypertension:
The ABCD Study. Hypertension 2012.
8.
Benjamin EJ, D'Agostino RB, Belanger AJ, Wolf PA, Levy D. Left atrial size and the
risk of stroke and death. The Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 1995; 92(4):835-841.
21
9.
Cuspidi C, Negri F, Sala C, Valerio C, Mancia G. Association of left atrial
enlargement with left ventricular hypertrophy and diastolic dysfunction: a tissue Doppler
study in echocardiographic practice. Blood Press 2012; 21(1):24-30.
10.
Levy D, Garrison RJ, Savage DD, Kannel WB, Castelli WP. Prognostic implications
of echocardiographically determined left ventricular mass in the Framingham Heart Study. N
Engl J Med 1990; 322(22):1561-1566.
11.
Vlachopoulos C, Aznaouridis K, Stefanadis C. Prediction of cardiovascular events and
all-cause mortality with arterial stiffness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll
Cardiol 2010; 55(13):1318-1327.
12.
Christensen S, Mogelvang R, Heitmann M, Prescott E. Level of education and risk of
heart failure: a prospective cohort study with echocardiography evaluation. Eur Heart J 2011;
32(4):450-458.
13.
Gardin JM, Wagenknecht LE, Anton-Culver H, Flack J, Gidding S, Kurosaki T, Wong
ND, Manolio TA. Relationship of cardiovascular risk factors to echocardiographic left
ventricular mass in healthy young black and white adult men and women. The CARDIA
study. Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults. Circulation 1995; 92(3):380-387.
14.
Vasan RS, Larson MG, Levy D. Determinants of echocardiographic aortic root size.
The Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 1995; 91(3):734-740.
15.
Vaziri SM, Larson MG, Lauer MS, Benjamin EJ, Levy D. Influence of blood pressure
on left atrial size. The Framingham Heart Study. Hypertension 1995; 25(6):1155-1160.
16.
Maggio AB, Aggoun Y, Marchand LM, Martin XE, Herrmann F, Beghetti M,
Farpour-Lambert NJ. Associations among obesity, blood pressure, and left ventricular mass. J
Pediatr 2008; 152(4):489-493.
17.
Malcolm DD, Burns TL, Mahoney LT, Lauer RM. Factors affecting left ventricular
mass in childhood: the Muscatine Study. Pediatrics 1993; 92(5):703-709.
22
18.
Jaddoe VW, van Duijn CM, Franco OH, van der Heijden AJ, van Iizendoorn MH, de
Jongste JC, van der Lugt A, Mackenbach JP, Moll HA, Raat H, Rivadeneira F, Steegers EA,
Tiemeier H, Uitterlinden AG, Verhulst FC, Hofman A. The Generation R Study: design and
cohort update 2012. Eur J Epidemiol 2012; 27(9):739-756.
19.
World Medical Association I. Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical principles for medical
research involving human subjects. J Indian Med Assoc 2009; 107(6):403-405.
20.
Statistics Netherlands. Standaard Onderwijsindeling 2003. Voorburg/Heerlen; 2004.
21.
Wong SN, Tz Sung RY, Leung LC. Validation of three oscillometric blood pressure
devices against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children. Blood Press Monit
2006; 11(5):281-291.
22.
Asmar R, Benetos A, Topouchian J, Laurent P, Pannier B, Brisac AM, Target R, Levy
BI. Assessment of arterial distensibility by automatic pulse wave velocity measurement.
Validation and clinical application studies. Hypertension 1995; 26(3):485-490.
23.
Donald AE, Charakida M, Falaschetti E, Lawlor DA, Halcox JP, Golding J, Hingorani
AD, Smith GD, Deanfield JE. Determinants of vascular phenotype in a large childhood
population: the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC). Eur Heart J
2010; 31(12):1502-1510.
24.
Schiller NB, Shah PM, Crawford M, DeMaria A, Devereux R, Feigenbaum H,
Gutgesell H, Reichek N, Sahn D, Schnittger I, et al. Recommendations for quantitation of the
left ventricle by two-dimensional echocardiography. American Society of Echocardiography
Committee on Standards, Subcommittee on Quantitation of Two-Dimensional
Echocardiograms. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1989; 2(5):358-367.
25.
Devereux RB, Alonso DR, Lutas EM, Gottlieb GJ, Campo E, Sachs I, Reichek N.
Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy: comparison to necropsy
findings. The American journal of cardiology 1986; 57(6):450-458.
23
26.
Geelhoed MJ, Snijders SP, Kleyburg-Linkers VE, Steegers EA, van Osch-Gevers L,
Jaddoe VW. Reliability of echocardiographic measurements of left cardiac structures in
healthy children. Cardiol Young 2009; 19(5):494-500.
27.
Lawlor DA, Najman JM, Sterne J, Williams GM, Ebrahim S, Davey Smith G.
Associations of parental, birth, and early life characteristics with systolic blood pressure at 5
years of age: findings from the Mater-University study of pregnancy and its outcomes.
Circulation 2004; 110(16):2417-2423.
28.
Simonetti GD, Schwertz R, Klett M, Hoffmann GF, Schaefer F, Wuhl E. Determinants
of blood pressure in preschool children: the role of parental smoking. Circulation 2011;
123(3):292-298.
29.
Muntner P, He J, Cutler JA, Wildman RP, Whelton PK. Trends in blood pressure
among children and adolescents. JAMA 2004; 291(17):2107-2113.
30.
Nettlefold L, McKay HA, Naylor PJ, Bredin SS, Warburton DE. The relationship
between objectively measured physical activity, sedentary time, and vascular health in
children. Am J Hypertens 2012; 25(8):914-919.
31.
Jaddoe VW, Bakker R, van Duijn CM, van der Heijden AJ, Lindemans J, Mackenbach
JP, Moll HA, Steegers EA, Tiemeier H, Uitterlinden AG, Verhulst FC, Hofman A. The
Generation R Study Biobank: a resource for epidemiological studies in children and their
parents. Eur J Epidemiol 2007; 22(12):917-923.
32.
Growth Analyzer 3.0, Dutch Growth Research Foundation, Rotterdam, the
Netherlands 2007.
33.
Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social
psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc
Psychol 1986;51(6):1173-1182.
24
34.
Venables WN, Smith DM: An Introduction to R. Notes on R: A Programming
Environment for Data Analysis and Graphics Version 2.12.1 (2012-12-16). 2010
available at http://www.r-project.org.
35.
Galobardes B, Shaw M, Lawlor DA, Lynch JW, Davey Smith G. Indicators of
socioeconomic position (part 1). J Epidemiol Community Health 2006; 60(1):7-12.
36.
Braveman PA, Cubbin C, Egerter S, Chideya S, Marchi KS, Metzler M, Posner S.
Socioeconomic status in health research: one size does not fit all. JAMA 2005; 294(22):28792888.
37.
Winkleby MA, Jatulis DE, Frank E, Fortmann SP. Socioeconomic status and health:
how education, income, and occupation contribute to risk factors for cardiovascular disease.
Am J Public Health 1992; 82(6):816-820.
38.
Jaddoe VW, Mackenbach JP, Moll HA, Steegers EA, Tiemeier H, Verhulst FC,
Witteman JC, Hofman A. The Generation R Study: Design and cohort profile. Eur J
Epidemiol 2006; 21(6):475-484.
39.
Howe LD, Tilling K, Galobardes B, Lawlor DA. Loss to follow-up in cohort studies:
bias in estimates of socioeconomic inequalities. Epidemiology 2013; 24(1):1-9.
40.
Nohr EA, Frydenberg M, Henriksen TB, Olsen J. Does low participation in cohort
studies induce bias? Epidemiology 2006; 17(4):413-418.
41.
Jarrin DC, McGrath JJ, Drake CL. Beyond sleep duration: distinct sleep dimensions
are associated with obesity in children and adolescents. Int J Obes (Lond) 2013; 37(4):552558.
42.
Thomas C, Nightingale CM, Donin AS, Rudnicka AR, Owen CG, Cook DG, Whincup
PH. Ethnic and socioeconomic influences on childhood blood pressure: the Child Heart and
Health Study in England. J Hypertens 2012; 30(11):2090-2097.
25
43.
Sorof J, Daniels S. Obesity hypertension in children: a problem of epidemic
proportions. Hypertension 2002; 40(4):441-447.
44.
Knowles G, Pallan M, Thomas GN, Ekelund U, Cheng KK, Barrett T, Adab P.
Physical activity and blood pressure in primary school children: a longitudinal study.
Hypertension 2013; 61(1):70-75.
45.
Messerli FH, Sundgaard-Riise K, Reisin ED, Dreslinski GR, Ventura HO, Oigman W,
Frohlich ED, Dunn FG. Dimorphic cardiac adaptation to obesity and arterial hypertension.
Ann Intern Med 1983; 99(6):757-761.
Download