Olefin Polymerizations Catalyzed by Late Transition Metal Complexes Maurice Brookhart University of North Carolina Polyolefins Polyethylene, CH2 Polypropylene, CH3CH CH CH2 CH2 CH2 Polystyrene, n n n 6 x 1010 lbs/yr 3 x 1010 lbs/yr 1 x 1010 lbs/yr Total : 100 billions / year 16lbs / person on Earth / year ! • Inexpensive monomers • Little waste in production • Attractive physical properties, long term stabilities Polymer Microstructure — Key to Properties Polypropylene H3C H3 C H isotactic H3C H H3C H H3C H H Tm = 160°C Stereoregular Tm = 165°C syndiotactic Completely amorphous atactic Polyethylene High Density PE (HDPE) Tm= 136°C R R Linear Low Density PE (LLDPE) Tm = 115~130°C Low Density PE (LDPE) Tm= 105~115°C Polyolefins Primarily Produced via Metal-Catalyzed Processes Catalyst Structures Control: — polymer microstructures — polymer molecular weights, molecular weight distributions — comonomer incorporation Early Metal Catalysts (Ti, Zr, Cr) isotactic polypropylene syndiotactic polypropylene atactic polypropylene Late Metal Catalysts (Pd, Ni, Co) O O O alternating CO / O copolymer high % crystallinity Ph Ph Ph syndiotactic polystyrene Ph Ph Ph Tm ~ 250oC General Mechanism for Polymer Formation Initiation LnM H LnM H migratory LnM insertion Chain Growth (RP) LnM migratory LnM LnM insertion etc Chain transfer (RCT) LnM LnM LnM P H H -H elim. P + LnM LnM P H H new chain starts etc. LnM RP >> RCT => High Polymer RP ~ RCT => Short Chains (oligomers) RP < RCT => Only C4 Olefin Polymerizations Using Late Metal Catalysts (Ni, Pd) Why Late Metals ? 1. Potentially different enchainment mechanisms => new microstructures 2. Less oxophilic — functional group compatible G G G But… 1. Normally lower insertion barriers 2. Chain transfer competitive with propagation => dimers, short chain oligomers α–Diimine Based Catalysts R R R' A R = H, Me, acenaphthyl R' N M R' R' = -iPr, -Me, aryl, halogen N H3C R' solv. CF3 A = B 4 M = Ni, Pd CF3 ■ High molecular weight polymers with unique microstructures from: ● ethylene ● α – olefins ● cyclopentene ● trans-1,2-disubstituted olefins ■ Copolymers of ethylene with certain polar vinyl monomers Catalysts Modeled on α–Diimine Systems R Ph N R Ar R N N N P M X R Ar M X R R MMAO Daugulis, Brookhart M = Fe, Co Bennett Small, Brookhart Gibson R R N N M R G R M = Ni, Pd R R R Ni N N N N N O R Grubbs Johnson (DuPont) R R M R M = Ni, Pd N O Killian (Eastman) Ni R Hicks, Jenkins, Brookhart Polyethylene n Early Metal Catalysts Ti (IV), Zr (IV), Cr/SiO2 linear PE semicrystalline Tm ~ 136 °C High Density PE, HDPE 1-10% incorporation, LLDPE R R R Tm = ~ 115 - 130 oC + Mn > 105 R amorphous PE R N N Pd R hyperbranched, R Solv R' 30 °C ~500 TO/hr ~100 branches / 1000 C's 5 Mn 10 - 10 R Tm: 25° - 135° C R N N Ni R Br R Br / Et2AlCl 6 30 °C ~1-3 x 106 TO/hr 5 - 80 branches / 1000 C's increasing [C2H4] decreases branching increasing T increases branching Poly (α–Olefins) Early Metal Catalysts R 1,2-insertion R Ar R N R R R R + "chain-straightened" (1, 3 enchainment) N Ar M chain-straightened, primarily C1, C4 branches (1,6 enchainment) 1,2–Disubstituted Olefins cis-1,3enchainment R Ar R N + A- N Ar M X Y chain straightening 1,3 insertion Mechanistic Studies Generation of Cationic Alkyl Complexes R R N X M N X R R N CH3 M N CH3 2 R'MgX N M = Pd stable at 25 °C CH3 M N CH3 R' = -CH3 -CH2CH3 -CH2CH2CH3 -CH2CH(CH3)2 H(OEt2)2+ BAr'4Et20 N M = Ni stable only below ca. -20 °C CH3 M N OEt2 + BAr'4- 1H, 13C NMR Studies – Pd(II) + Ar Me N Pd N OEt2 Ar + Ar C2H4 (excess) N CD2Cl2 -80 °C N Me Pd Ar -30 °C k1 + Ar poly N Pd N Ar catalyst resting state + Ar N kp, -30 °C Pd N Ar Insertion Kinetics – Ni(II) + Ar Me N Ni N 1. 20 eq C2H4 -130 °C 2. -110 °C Ni Ar + Ar Pr N Ni Ar + Ar -70 °C N ksub. insert. N R Ni Ar -80 °C k1st insertion N Ar N Me N CDCl2F OEt2 + Ar Activation Barriers to Insertion (ethylene) G (1st insertion) G (subseq. insertions) + Me N Ni 13.6 kcal/mol (-81 oC) 14.0 kcal/mol (-72 oC) 18.4 kcal/mol (-20 oC) 18.6 kcal/mol (-20 oC) N + N Me Pd N G‡ (Pd-Ni) ca. 5 kcal/mol Mechanistic Model insertion insertion R' N N R R M M N N M N methyl branch resting state N ethyl branch turnoverlimiting R N R N M N R M N H N R' N M N M N "chain running" Blocking of Axial Coordination Sites Chain Transfer Mechanisms (1) Associative Displacement (retarded by blocking axial postions) N N N M N + R M H H R (2) Chain Transfer to Monomer (suggested by Ziegler calculations) H3C N N Ni Ni H3C N H3C N N H Ni H3C N Mechanistic Model insertion insertion R' N N R R M M N N M N methyl branch resting state N ethyl branch turnoverlimiting R N R N M N R M N H N R' N M N M N "chain running" Formation of Agostic Ethyl Complex BAr'4 N Pd N H(OiPr2)2BAr'4 N CDCl2F, -80 oC N CH3CH3 1 H 2.2 ppm 13 C 38.5 ppm Hc Hc C C Pd -8.9 ppm t, 2JHH = 16 Hz 1 JCH = 67 Hz 1 JCH = 153 Hz Hb Hb Ha 1 H 1.4 ppm 13 1 C 19.3 ppm JCH = 155 Hz Pd H (-130 oC) Dynamics of Agostic Ethyl Complex Hc H c N * Pd Hb Hb Ha N * N Hb Hb N Pd Pd N * Ha Hc Hc Ha N k = 1450 s-1, -108 oC G‡ = 7.1 kcal/mol H H N H H Ni N H H H N N Ni Ni N H H H k = 170 s-1, 16 °C G‡ = 14.0 kcal/mol N H Cationic Metal Alkyl Intermediates – Ethylene Trapping Experiments N Pd H(OEt2)2+ BAr'4-80 °C N N N Pd Pd H N 1 N -80 °C -65 °C 20 N Pd Pd N N 1 H N 20 -25 °C insertion (several 100 1,2 shifts prior to insertion) (via reversible loss of C2H4) Cationic Metal Alkyl Intermediates – Ethylene Trapping Experiments N Ni N -80 °C X N Ni N -80 °C N N Ni N Ni N etc. etc. no equilibration prior to insertion Mechanistic Model insertion insertion R' N N R R M M N N M N methyl branch resting state N ethyl branch turnoverlimiting R N R N M N R M H N H N R' N M N M H N H "chain running" Commercial Copolymers of Ethylene and Polar Vinyl Monomers ● Radical Initiation ● High temperatures, very high ethylene pressure CO2Me OAc CO2Bu CN CO2H Si(OMe)3 CO2H Examination of Pd and Ni Diimine Catalysts for Copolymerizations of Ethylene and: OR 1. O O 2. O R OR 3. Si OR OR Problems Connected with G Copolymerization 1. Monomer Binding through the Functional Group R L M R L + M G L L G 2. β-Elimination of G R L M L R L L M M G L R G L G 3. Weak Competitive Binding of R L G M M + L R L + L G G K >> 1 4. Strong Chelate Formation Following Insertion R L insertion M L G isomerization L L M L M L G K << 1 G 5. High Barrier to Insertion of Open Chelate G L M G R insertion M slow R G1‡ R G2‡ L L L M L L R insertion fast L M L ‡ G1‡ > G2 Examples: G = -CN ; -Br, -Cl CH3 N CN CH3 N Pd Pd N N OEt2 NC Ittel, Johnson, Brookhart, Chem. Rev. 2000 CH3 N X = Br, Cl Pd N X Sen, et. al. 2002 Jordan, et. al. 2003 N Pd N N elim Pd X N N X X Pd N N Pd X N 2+ Ethylene / Acrylate Copolymerization - Pd CH3 N Pd N NCCH3 CO2CH3 CH2Cl2, T = 35 oC P(C2H4) = 2 atm MA = 25 vol% CO2CH3 TOF = ca. 100 TO/h (slow!) Branched Copolymer 6 mol% MA incorporation 103 branches/1000 C Methyl Acrylate Insertion O OCH3 N Pd N CH3 -80 oC 2,1-insertion O N -60 oC Pd OCH3 N OCH3 O N Pd N O N Pd N -30 oC OCH3 Mechanism of Copolymerization O OCH3 N OCH3 N O +C2H4 N -C2H4 N Pd Pd N 2,1-ins. G = 16 kcal/mol ‡ P rearrangement Pd N K ~ 0.02 M-1 P resting state O P OCH3 25 °C insertion ‡ G ~ 18 kcal/mol N Pd chain growth N O chain running P OCH3 Examination of Pd and Ni Diimine Catalysts for Copolymerizations of Ethylene and: OR 1. O O 2. O R OR 3. Si OR OR Ethylene / Alkoxy Vinyl Silane Copolymers Versipol Group - DuPont R' random copolymer R' Si(OR)xR'y R'' N N M R' R L R' / linear to highly branched R'' 25 - 120 °C up to 32 mol% comonomer incorporation 600 psi C2H4, 60 °C N N Ni Me3Si SiMe3 5 vol% Si(OEt)3 toluene 5 eq. B(C6F5)3 5 eq. LiB(C6F5)4 PE copolymer 0.42 mol% silane 10 Me branches / 1000 C Tm = 121 °C Mn = 25.5 K, Mw/Mn = 2.9 110 kg PE / gm Ni Vinyl Alkoxy Silane Insertion Chemistry - N N Si(OEt)(Me)2 OEt2 CD2Cl2 -60 °C Ni Me no 2-alkene complexes observed N N N Ni Si Si(OEt)(Me)2 N Ni O O Et Et 15% 2,1 insertion Si 85% 1,2 insertion Evidence for Reversible C2H4 Coordination N N N Ni O Et Si N Ni + C2H4 CDCl2F EtO Si Keq ca. 0.035 M-1, -120 °C 4.68 4.59 3.96 3.73 Advantages of Vinyl Alkoxy Silane Comonomers 1. Insertion barriers of vinyl alkoxy silanes into Pd-R and Ni-R bonds are similar to ethylene insertion barriers. 2. Chelates resulting from vinyl alkoxy silane insertions are readily opened with ethylene. 3. Open chelates readily insert ethylene. 4. Relative binding affinities favor ethylene, but not to a prohibitive extent.