Lean Six Sigma Measure Phase Tollgate Review Lean Six Sigma DMAIC Tools and Activities Review Value Identify Validate Project Charter High-Level Value Stream Map and Scope Validate Voice of the Customer & Voice of the Business Validate Problem Statement and Goals Validate Financial Benefits Create Communication Plan Select and Launch Team Develop Project Schedule Complete Define Tollgate Identify Stream Map Flow Key Input, Process and Output Metrics Develop Operational Definitions Develop Data Collection Plan Validate Measurement System Collect Baseline Data Determine Process Capability Complete Measure Tollgate Reduce Define Measure Project Value Voice Process Charter of the Customer and Kano Analysis SIPOC Map Project Valuation/ROIC Analysis Tools RACI and Quad Charts Stakeholder Analysis Communication Plan Effective Meeting Tools Inquiry and Advocacy Skills Time Lines, Milestones, and Gantt Charting Pareto Analysis Stream Mapping Cycle Efficiency/Little’s Law Operational Definitions Data Collection Plan Statistical Sampling Measurement System Analysis (MSA) Gage R&R Kappa Studies Control Charts Spaghetti Diagrams Histograms Normality Test Process Capability Analysis Root Causes List of Potential Root Causes Confirm Root Cause to Output Relationship Estimate Impact of Root Causes on Key Outputs Prioritize Root Causes Value-Add Analysis Takt Rate Analysis Quick Wins Statistical Analysis Complete Analyze Tollgate Analyze Process Constraint ID and Takt Time Analysis Cause & Effect Analysis FMEA Hypothesis Tests/Conf. Intervals Simple & Multiple Regression ANOVA Components of Variation Conquering Product and Process Complexity Queuing Theory Develop Potential Solutions Select, and Optimize Best Solutions Develop ‘To-Be’ Value Stream Map(s) Develop and Implement Pilot Solution Implement 5s Program Develop Full Scale Implementation Plan Cost/Benefit Analysis Benchmarking Complete Improve Tollgate Evaluate, Develop SOP’s, Training Plan & Process Controls Implement Solution and Ongoing Process Measurements Confirm Attainment of Project Goals Identify Project Replication Opportunities Training Complete Control Tollgate Transition Project to Process Owner Improve Replenishment Pull/Kanban Stocking Strategy Process Flow Improvement Process Balancing Analytical Batch Sizing Total Productive Maintenance Design of Experiments (DOE) Solution Selection Matrix Piloting and Simulation Work Control System Setup reduction Pugh Matrix Pull System Control Mistake-Proofing/ Zero Defects Operating Procedures (SOP’s) Process Control Plans Visual Process Control Tools MGPP Statistical Process Controls (SPC) Solution Replication Visual Workplace Metrics Project Transition Model Team Feedback Session Standard Kaizen Events Targeted in Measure to Accelerate Results International Standards for Lean Six Sigma 2 Improve Summary Vital X (root cause) Proof of Causation Practical Solution (process change Operating to address X) Tolerances for X Eliminate process - Place accountability n/a on Client HR for information placed into new database. Client IT need to reverify all exit data received from Client HR Average delay between reception of information from Client HR until it reaches NT Admin or general admin E-mail vendor's contract with Client The SLA has a range of 35 business days for the completion of a delete request E-mail vendor instituted new web interface for all add/delete requests, vastly improving request processing time. 1 - 2 days E-mail vendor's contract with Client The SLA has a range of 35 business days for the completion of a delete request E-mail vendor instituted new web interface for all add/delete requests, vastly improving request processing time. 1 - 2 days Solution Selection Criteria How the solution was determined: • What was the solution selection tool used? • What project management tools were used? • Cost/benefit analysis? • Include any other tools or methods used Pilot and Implementation Plan 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. ? ? ? ? ? Enter Key Slide Take Away (Key Point) Here International Standards for Lean Six Sigma 3 Descriptive Statistics Process Capability Process Capability Analysis for Cholesterol Process Data USL Data ST LT 220.000 * * (Baseline) 193.133 30 26.0455 22.4931 USL Target LSL 220.000 * * Mean Sample N 193.133 30 StDev (ST) StDev (LT) 26.0455 22.4931 Capability * 0.34 * 0.34 * 120 160 180 200 220 240 Process Capability Analysis for Control Expected ST Perf ormance Capability Observed Perf ormance * 0.40 ess Data * 0.40 220.000 ) ) 140 260 Expected LT Perf ormance PPM < LSL PPM > USL * 133333.33 PPM < LSL PPM > USL * 151146.50 PPM < LSL PPM > USL PPM Total 133333.33 PPM Total 151146.50 PPM Total USL * 116152.65 116152.65 ST LT * * 184.967 30 (Improved) 20.4206 16.3662 (ST) Capability * 0.57 * 0.57 * LT) Capability 140 160 Observed Perf ormance 180 200 Expected ST Perf ormance 220 Process Data Potential (ST) Capability USL Cp Target CPU LSL 220.000 * * 0.34 * CPL Mean Cpk Sample N 184.967 * 0.34 30 Cpm (ST) StDev StDev (LT) 20.4206 * 16.3662 240 Expected LT Perf ormance Overall (LT) Capability Potential (ST) Capability Pp Enter Key Slide Take Away (Key Point) Here * 0.71 PPM < LSL PPM > USL * 0.00 PPM < LSL PPM > USL * 43119.06 PPM < LSL PPM > USL * 16153.51 * 0.71 PPM Total 0.00 PPM Total 43119.06 PPM Total 16153.51 Cp PPU CPU PPL International Standards for Lean Six Sigma CPL * * 0.40 0.57 * * 4 FMEA Example Document delay of not scheduled Received delivery User forgot to update system 7 and send document 3 Call user to escalate issue New RPN New Detection # New Occurance # Current Control New Severity # Causes of Failure Target Actual Date Recommended Completion Action Action Responsibility Date Completed Ima N. Charge, Automate system Program settings for Manager 7 147 missing field 9/30/2005 10/20/2005 7 1 1 7 values and auto Joe Schmoe, send Process Mgr RPN Item/ Process Step Potential Potential Failure Failure Mode Effects Detection # Occurrence # Risk Analysis recommended actions (Key Speaking Points) Rating Index Total Current RPN Risk Severity # Enter Key Slide Take Away (Key Point) Here International Standards for Lean Six Sigma 5 RACI Chart R = Responsible – The person who performs the action/task. A = Accountable – The person who is held accountable that the action/task is completed. C = Consulted – The person(s) who is consulted before performing the action/task. I = Informed – The person(s) who is informed after performing the action/task. Step Action/Task Responsible Accountable Consulted Informed 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Enter Key Slide Take Away (Key Point) Here International Standards for Lean Six Sigma 6 Control / Response & Escalation Plan Process (x) and Outcome (y) Indicators Total number of open tickets at end of day UOM ticket Target 0 Control Process Owner/ Limit Data Monitor 10 Joe Schmoe System/ Source Remedy Ticket Data What to check Open ticket report on reports screen Frequency/ Time Procedure Reference (optional) Daily M-F at SOP 7.2 5 pm Notify Service Delivery Leader if # of open tickets per day is above control limit. SDL will carry out root cause analysis with Action if control limit is exceeded: team members, post resulting findings on call center bulletin board and Knowledge Base web site. Program Manager will be notified if open tickets exceeds 15; Customer will be notified if open tickets exceeds 20. Remedy Ticket Open ticket report on Daily M-F at SOP 7.2 Data reports screen 5 pm Notify manager if any individual has >2 open tickets for more than 1 consectuive day. Work with indivdual to determine Action if control limit is exceeded: root cause and agree on remedy actions. Number of tickets per technician ticket 0 2 Joe Schmoe people Number of staff with PTO Weekly 0 2 Tom Orrow Outlook Calendar none out/day for coming week Friday pm Arrange for coverage from XYZ account if more than 2 people on personal time off (unless predicted ticket volume is less Action if control limit is exceeded: than 200 per day) Personal Time Off Schedule Process Escalation Map Data Monitor checks the dashboard and learns that I-MR and is out of control Escalates to the Process Owner & Black Belt for special cause identification FMEA is used to update any failure/actions or improvements not recorded Supplier is contacted to review defects and actions Enter Key Slide Take Away (Key Point) Here International Standards for Lean Six Sigma 7 Business Impact State financial impact of future project leverage opportunities Separate “hard or Type 1” from “soft Type 2 or 3” dollars Annual Estimate Type 1: ? Type 2: ? Type 3: ? Replicated Estimate Type 1: ? Type 2: ? Type 3: ? Revenue Enhancement • • • Expenses Reduction • Type • Type 1: ? 2: ? • Type 3: ? • • Loss Reduction • Type 1: ? • Type 2: ? • Type 3: ? • Cost Avoidance • Type 1: ? Type 2: ? Type 3: ? • • • • • Type 1: ? Type 2: ? Type 3: ? Total Savings • • • Type 1: ? Type 2: ? Type 3: ? • • • Type 1: ? Type 2: ? Type 3: ? • • • Type 1: ? Type 2: ? • Type 3: ? Type 1: ? • Type 2: ? • Type 3: ? Enter Key Slide Take Away (Key Point) Here International Standards for Lean Six Sigma 8 Business Impact Details Type 1: Describe the chain of causality that shows how you determined the Type 1 savings. (tell the story with cause–effect relationships, on how the proposed change should create the desired financial result (savings) in your project ) Show the financial calculation savings and assumptions used. Type 2: Describe the chain of causality that shows how you determined the Type 2 savings. (tell the story with cause–effect relationships, on how the proposed change should create the desired financial result (savings) in your project ) Show the financial calculation savings and assumptions used. Assumption #1 (i.e. Labor rate used, period of time, etc…) Assumption #2 (i.e. contractor hrs or FTE, source of data, etc…) Describe the Type 3 Business Impact(s) areas and how these were measured Assumption #1 (i.e. source of data, clear Operational Definitions?) Assumption #2 (i.e. hourly rate + incremental benefit cost + travel) Assumption #1 (i.e. project is driven by the Business strategy?) Assumption #2 (i.e. Customer service rating, employee moral, etc…) Other Questions Stakeholders agree on the project’s impact and how it will be measured in financial terms? What steps were taken to ensure the integrity & accuracy of the data? Has the project tracking worksheet been updated? Enter Key Slide Take Away (Key Point) Here International Standards for Lean Six Sigma 9 Current Status Key actions completed Issues Lessons learned Communication, team building, organizational activities Lean Six Sigma Project Status and Planning Deliverables/Tasks Completed last week Upcoming Deliverables/Tasks - 2 weeks out Comment Due Revised Due For deliverables due thru: Actions Scheduled for next 2 Weeks Deliverable/Action Who Due Revised Due Commen Current Issues and Risks Who Due Revised Due Recomm Issue/Risk Enter Key Slide Take Away (Key Point) Here International Standards for Lean Six Sigma 10 Next Steps Key actions Planned Lean Six Sigma Tool use Questions to answer Barrier/risk mitigation activities Lean Six Sigma Project Issue Log No. Description/Recommendation Status Open/Closed/Hold Last Revised: Revised Due Due Date Resp Comments / Resolution Date 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Enter Key Slide Take Away (Key Point) Here International Standards for Lean Six Sigma 11 Lessons Learned 1. ? 2. ? 3. ? 4. ? 5. ? 6. ? 7. ? 8. ? 9. ? 10. ? Enter Key Slide Take Away (Key Point) Here International Standards for Lean Six Sigma 12 Project Contributors Steering Team Support Team <Name>: <Contribution> <Name>: <Contribution> <Name>: <Contribution> <Name>: <Contribution> <Name>: <Contribution> <Name>: <Contribution> <Name>: <Contribution> <Name>: <Contribution> <Name>: <Contribution> <Name>: <Contribution> Project Ownership Team Deployment Team <Name>: <Contribution> <Name>: <Contribution> <Name>: <Contribution> <Name>: <Contribution> <Name>: <Contribution> <Name>: <Contribution> <Name>: <Contribution> <Name>: <Contribution> <Name>: <Contribution> <Name>: <Contribution> Enter Key Slide Take Away (Key Point) Here International Standards for Lean Six Sigma 13 Sign Off Once the project is complete and has been reviewed by the Green Belt/Black Belt or other Quality mentor, the project should be reviewed with Deployment Champion, Project Sponsor, Process Owner, Master Black Belt and other project or process stakeholders. In addition, financial benefits of the project (or the method used to estimate financial benefits) should be confirmed by your Process Owner and/or finance representative. Policies & Procedures for the Improve & Control phases were documented & communicated on MM/DD/YY I understand the New Policies and Procedures I understand and take responsibility for monitoring the Defect Measurements as delineated in the Control Plan I will report the progress on this sub-process on a regular basis to the customer I have reviewed this project’s financial benefits with the Champion, Sponsor, and Finance I understand the corrective action procedure and am responsible for ensuring that action items are completed to hold the gains and capture the financial benefits Enter Name Here Enter Name Here Enter Name Here Enter Name Here Sponsor / Process Owner Executive Director Financial Representative Green Belt/Black Belt Enter Name Here Enter Name Here Enter Name Here Enter Name Here “Other” Key Stakeholder “Other” Key Stakeholder Master Black Belt Deployment Champion Enter Key Slide Take Away (Key Point) Here International Standards for Lean Six Sigma 14 Tollgate Reviews Backup Slides D M A I C Project Charter Financial Impact Problem/Goal Statement Problem: Describe problem in non-technical terms Statement should explain why project is important; why working on it is a priority Goal: Goals communicate “before” and “after” conditions Shift mean, variance, or both? Should impact cost, time, quality dimensions Express goals using SMART criteria Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Resource Requirements, Time Boundaries Explain leverage and strategic implications (if any) Team State financial impact of project Expenses Investments (inventory, capital, A/R) Revenues Separate “hard” from “soft” dollars State financial impact of leverage opportunities (future projects) Tollgate Review Schedule PES Name Project Executive Sponsor (if different from PS) PS Name Project Sponsor/Process Owner DC Name Deployment Champion GB/BB Name Green Belt/Black Belt MBB Name Master Black Belt Core Team Role % Contrib. LSS Training Team Member 1 SME XX YB Team Member 2 TM XX GB Team Member 3 SME XX PS Extended Team Team Member 1 BFM XX Not Trained Team Member 2 IT XX Not Trained Tollgate Scheduled Revised Define: XX/XX/XX Measure: XX/XX/XX XX/XX/XX Analyze: XX/XX/XX XX/XX/XX Improve: XX/XX/XX XX/XX/XX Control: XX/XX/XX XX/XX/XX Review high-level schedule milestones here: Phase Completions Tollgate Reviews Complete XX/XX/XX XX/XX/XX XX/XX/XX XX/XX/XX XX/XX/XX Enter Key Slide Take Away (Key Point) Here International Standards for Lean Six Sigma 16 Measure Overview Process Capability I-MR Chart of Delivery Time 40 U C L=37.70 Individual Value CTQ: ? Unit (d) or Mean (c): ? Defect (d) or St. Dev. (c): ? PCE%: ? DPMO (d): ? Sigma (Short Term): ? Sigma (Long Term):? MSA Results: show the percentage result of the GR&R, AR&R or other MSA carried out in the project Root cause: Quick Win #1 Root cause: Quick Win #2 Root cause: Quick Win #3 _ X=29.13 30 25 LC L=20.56 1 28 55 82 109 136 O bser v ation 163 190 217 244 U C L=10.53 10.0 7.5 5.0 __ M R=3.22 2.5 0.0 LC L=0 1 Root Cause / Quick Win 35 20 Moving Range Graphical Analysis 28 55 82 109 136 O bser v ation 163 190 217 244 Tools Used Detailed process mapping MSA Value Stream Mapping Data Collection Planning Basic Statistics Process Capability Histograms Time Series Plot Probability Plot Pareto Analysis Operational Def. 5s Pull Control Charts Enter Key Slide Take Away (Key Point) Here International Standards for Lean Six Sigma 17 Analyze Overview Hypothesis Tests Example: ANOVA Example: ANOVA Example: Chi Squared Example: Pareto Factor (x) Tested Value Add Analysis - Current State p Value Location Part vs. No Part Department Region Observations/Conclusion 0.030 Significant factor - 1 hour driving time from DC to Baltimore office causes ticket cycle time to generally be longer for the Baltimore site 0.004 Significant factor - on average, calls requiring parts have double the cycle time (22 vs 43 hours) 0.000 Significant factor - Department 4 has digitized addition of customer info to ticket and less human intervention, resulting in fewer errors n/a South region accounted for 59% of the defects due to their manual process and distance from the parts warehouse Takt Tim e = 55 Task Time (seconds) Hypothesis Test (ANOVA, 1 or 2 sample t - test, Chi Squared, Regression, Test of Equal Variance, etc) Value-Add Analysis Effect Root cause: Effect Root cause: Effect 40 20 0 2 3 4 CVA Time 5 6 Task # BVA Time 7 8 9 10 NVA Time Tools Used Root Cause / Effect Root cause: 60 1 Describe any other observations about the root cause (x) data 80 Value Add Analysis One-Way ANOVA Two-Way ANOVA Pareto Plots Simple Linear Regression Multiple Regression Test for Equal Variance Scatter Plots C&E Matrix Complexity Cause & Effect Diagram Kaizen/Quick Wins FMEA Control/Impact Chart T-Test Other Enter Key Slide Take Away (Key Point) Here International Standards for Lean Six Sigma 18 Improve Tollgate Checklist What techniques were used to generate ideas for potential solutions? What narrowing and screening techniques were used to further develop and qualify potential solutions? What evaluation criteria were used to select a recommended solution? Do proposed solutions address all the identified root causes, at least the most critical? Were the solutions verified with the Project Sponsor and Stakeholders? Has an approval been received to implement? Was a pilot run to test the solution? What was learned? What modifications made? Has the team seen evidence that the root causes of the initial problems have been addressed during the pilot? What are the expected benefits? Has the team considered potential problems and unintended consequences (FMEA) of the solution and developed preventive and contingency actions to address them? Has the proposed solution been documented, including process participants, job descriptions and if applicable, their estimated time commitment to support the process? Has the team developed an implementation plan? What is the status? Have changes been communicated to all the appropriate people? Has the team been able to identify any additional ‘Quick Wins’? Have ‘learning's’ to-date required modification of the Project Charter? If so, have these changes been approved by the Project Sponsor and the Key Stakeholders? Have any new risks to project success been identified and added to the Risk Mitigation Plan? Deliverables: Prioritized List of Solutions “To-Be” Value Stream Map(s) Pilot Plan & Results Approved Solution and Detailed Implementation Plan Additional “Quick Wins”, if applicable Refined Charter, as necessary Updated Risk Mitigation Plan Deliverables Uploaded to Central Storage Location or Deployment Management System Tollgate Review Has the team developed improvement solutions for the critical X’s, piloted the solution and verified that the solution will solve the problem? International Standards for Lean Six Sigma 19 Control Tollgate Checklist Has the team prepared all the essential documentation for the improved process, including revised/new Standard Operating Procedures (SOP’s), a training plan and a process control system? Has the necessary training for process owners/operators been performed? Have the right measures been selected, and documented as part of the Process Control System, to monitor performance of the process and the continued effectiveness of the solution? Has the metrics briefing plan/schedule been documented? Who owns the measures? Has the Process Owner’s job description been updated to reflect the new responsibilities? What happens if minimum performance is not achieved? Has the solution been effectively implemented? Has the team compiled results data confirming that the solution has achieved the goals defined in the Project Charter? Has the Benefits Realization Schedule been verified by the Financial Representative? Has the process been transitioned to the Process Owner, to take over responsibility for managing continuing operations? Do they concur with the control plan? Has a final Storyboard documenting the project work been developed? Has the team forwarded other issues/opportunities, which were not able to be addressed, to senior management? Have “lessons learned” been captured? Have replication opportunities been identified and communicated? Has the hard work and successful efforts of our team been celebrated? Deliverables: SOP’s Training Plan Process Control System Benefits Realization Schedule, validated by Financial Representative Validated Solution Replication/ Standardization Plan Lessons Learned Transitioned Project Project Risk Performance Deliverables Uploaded to Central Storage Location or Deployment Management System Tollgate Review Has the team implemented the solution, and a control plan to insure the process is robust to change? International Standards for Lean Six Sigma 20 Lean Six Sigma DMAIC Improvement Process Define Define the opportunity from both the customer and business perspective Measure Understand the baseline process performance Analyze Identify the critical X factors and root causes impacting process performance Improve Develop solutions linked to critical x’s Control Implement solutions & control plan Enter Key Slide Take Away (Key Point) Here International Standards for Lean Six Sigma 21 Measurement Systems Analysis (Optional) Total Gage R&R Repeatability Reproducibility operator Part-To-Part Total Variation 41.38 For Continuous Data, use Minitab GR&R Study For Discrete data, use AR&R Excel Tool 41.38 For more information, see Notes section of this slide 0.00 Known Population Individual 1 Individual 2 Match Match 0.00 Sample # Attribute Try #1 Try #2 Try #1 Try #2 Each Other Known 91.04 1 pass pass pass pass pass N N 100.00 2 pass pass pass pass pass N N 17.12 17.12 0.00 0.00 82.88 100.00 Conclusions: 17.12% of component variation from measurement system, 82.88% of component variation from part-to-part measured Gage name: Date of study: Reported by: Tolerance: Misc: Gage R&R (ANOVA) for time Xbar Chart by operator 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 1 operator*part Interaction 2 operator 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 Average 3.0SL=75.30 X=59.80 -3.0SL=44.30 0 part 1 2 1 R Chart by operator 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 1 3.0SL=56.83 R=26.87 -3.0SL=0.00E+00 0 Oper 0 Reprod Percent 4 1 Part-to-Part 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 part 1 2 3 fail fail fail pass pass pass fail fail pass pass fail fail pass fail fail fail pass fail fail fail fail pass fail pass pass pass pass pass fail fail pass fail fail fail pass fail "REPEATABILITY" -> "ACCURACY" -> 2 Response By part %Total Var %Study Var 50 Repeat 3 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 Components of Variation 100 Gage R&R 2 Response By operator 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 4 fail fail fail pass fail pass pass pass pass pass fail fail pass fail fail fail pass fail fail fail pass pass fail pass pass fail pass pass fail pass pass pass fail fail pass fail 100.00% 85.00% pass fail fail pass fail pass pass fail pass pass fail fail pass fail fail fail pass fail N Y N Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y N Y N Y Y Y Y N Y N Y N Y N N Y Y Y N Y N Y Y Y Y 80.00% 70.00% "OVERALL REPEATABILITY & REPRODUCIBILITY" -> 65.00% "OVERALL REPEATABILITY, REPRODUCIBILITY & ACCURACY" -> 55.00% Enter Key Slide Take Away (Key Point) Here International Standards for Lean Six Sigma 22 Control Chart (Optional) P Chart for Total Defectives Proportion 0.10 Control Chart Findings Feb/Mar Data Confirms Process Has Remained In Control 3.0SL=0.08162 0.05 ? ? ? ? ? P=0.03817 0.00 -3.0SL=0.00E+00 0 50 100 150 Sample Number Enter Key Slide Take Away (Key Point) Here International Standards for Lean Six Sigma 23 Takt Board – Monitor (Optional) TAKT BOARD: <Department Name> Last Week: <CTQ> This Week: <CTQ> Day Scheduled Actual Diff (+/-) Comments Enter Key Slide Take Away (Key Point) Here International Standards for Lean Six Sigma 24 Mistake Proofing (Poke Yoke) (Optional) Solution: Make use of existing bar codes on shipping paperwork to mistake proof receiving function. Validate with suppliers (shipping company) that all shipping containers will have barcode label ($0) Purchase RF (wireless) bar coding equipment and software ($100/gun * 20 guns) Train all longshoreman on use and care of equipment ($50/hr * 20 hrs) Install error metrics for error tracking ($100) Enter Key Slide Take Away (Key Point) Here International Standards for Lean Six Sigma 25 Cultural/Educational Issues (Optional) Force Field Analysis: 1. Select a process control Driving Forces Restraining Forces method & explain why this choice for your project. 2. Identify 4-6 cultural/educational barriers to successfully implementing your process controls & potential solutions using the Force-Field Analysis Table below: Enter Key Slide Take Away (Key Point) Here International Standards for Lean Six Sigma 26 Replication (Optional) Replication Goals 29% $ savings captured with 1st completed project in 10 week project 70% $ savings captured with 5 locations replicated in 6 months 100% $ savings captured with 9 locations replicated in 9 months Replication Strategy Build change team Train / Kaizen Dashboard Metrics 10 Wks 6 Mo 9 Mo Enter Key Slide Take Away (Key Point) Here International Standards for Lean Six Sigma 27