LOGO The Nature of Theory in Information Systems by Shirley Gregor 指導教授 : 洪新原教授 組員: 602530036簡郁珊 602530030蔡孟如 602556017楊宗承 102年 9月 大綱 Abstract introduction 在理論中不同的觀點 Classifying theory in IS Five types of theory in IS The Nature of Theory in Information Systems 摘要 The Nature of Theory in Information Systems LOGO 介紹 介紹 What is theory Definition of theory the nature of theory The Nature of Theory in Information Systems 介紹 Theory elements The Nature of Theory in Information Systems 介紹 思考知識或理論架構可能出現的問題 譬如: What is theory? 什麼是理論 How is theory constructed? 理論是如何構成的 而這些問題被歸類為四個互相關聯的類別 The Nature of Theory in Information Systems 介紹 Domain questions. Epistemological questions Text 四種問題的類別 Socio-political questions The Nature of Theory in Information Systems Structural or ontological questions 介紹 Domain questions. 領域問題 What are the core problems or topics of interest? 核心問題或感興趣的話題是什麼 What are the boundaries of the discipline?學科的界線是什麼 The Nature of Theory in Information Systems 介紹 Structural or ontological questions. 結構或本體論的問題 What is theory?什麼是理論 How is this term understood in the discipline? 學科是如何理解這個術 語 How is theory expressed? 如何表 達理論 The Nature of Theory in Information Systems 介紹 Ontological 是由實體(entities)、屬性(attributes)、以及 關聯(relations)三個概念組成 實體 entities 關係 relations 屬性 arreibutes The Nature of Theory in Information Systems 介紹 Ontology 廣義: An ontology is an explicit specification of a conceptualization 其他重要性定義 1. Shared conceptualization 2. logical theory 介紹 Ontology是共享概念模型的形式化規範說明, 該定義有四層含義 1. • Conceptualization 2. • Explicit 3. • Formal 4. • share The Nature of Theory in Information Systems 介紹 Epistemological questions. 知識論 的問題 How is theory constructed?理論是 如何構成的 How can scientific knowledge be acquired? 如何獲得科學知識 What research methods can be used?什麼研究方法可以使用 The Nature of Theory in Information Systems 介紹 Epistemological 探討知識的本質、起源和範圍的一個哲學分支 目的 the nature of knowledge the extent or scope of knowledge The Nature of Theory in Information Systems 介紹 先驗知識 僅憑推理得到的知識,而不受直接或間接經驗的影 響 (經驗:指通過感官對世界的觀察) 後驗知識 知識的得來和證實需要藉助經驗,又稱經驗性知識 知識論的核心問題之一為是否存在先驗綜合知識 The Nature of Theory in Information Systems 介紹 知識架構圖 knowledge is justified true belief知識是「証明為真的信念」 The Nature of Theory in Information Systems 介紹 Socio-political questions. 社會政治 問題 Where and by whom has theory been developed? 理論在哪,由誰所開發 How is knowledge applied? 知識如何應 用 The Nature of Theory in Information Systems LOGO 在理論中不同的觀點 在理論中不同的觀點 Generalization Data is form the foundation for theoretical development. The notion of prediction entails some conception of generality. In order to predict what will happen in the future, we need a generalization that includes future events. The Nature of Theory in Information Systems 在理論中不同的觀點 Causality The idea of causality, or the relation between cause and event, is central to many conceptions of theory. The ability to make predictions from theory can depend on knowledge of causal connections. The Nature of Theory in Information Systems 在理論中不同的觀點 Four prominent approaches to the analysis of event causation can be distinguished (see Kim 1999): Regularity (or nomological) analysis. Counterfactual analysis. Probabilistic causal analysis. Manipulation or teleological causal analysis. www.themegallery.com Company Logo 在理論中不同的觀點 Regularity (or nomological) analysis Universal regularity gives rise to universal or covering laws. “There are some causes, which are entirely uniform and constant in producing a particular effect; and no instance has ever been found of any failure or irregularity in their operation” (Hume 1748, p. 206). www.themegallery.com Company Logo 在理論中不同的觀點 Counterfactual analysis Under this approach, what makes an event a cause of another is the fact that if the cause had not occurred, the event would not have (the cause is a necessary condition). www.themegallery.com Company Logo 在理論中不同的觀點 Probabilistic causal analysis There are other causes, which have been found more irregular and uncertain; nor has rhubarb always proved a purge, or opium a soporific to everyone, who has taken these medicines. This view is thought to be suited to the social sciences, where the lack of a closed system and the effects of many extraneous influences make other analysis difficult to undertake. www.themegallery.com Company Logo 在理論中不同的觀點 Manipulation causal analysis. In this view, a cause is an event or state that we can produce at will, or otherwise manipulate to bring about a certain other event as an effect. This analysis relies on an everyday understanding of a cause as an act by an intentional agent, for example, flicking a switch causes a light to turn on. www.themegallery.com Company Logo 在理論中不同的觀點 Explanation In scientific research, explanation is one of the purposes of research. An explanation is a set of statements constructed to describe a set of facts which clarifies the causes, context, and consequences of those facts. Explanation is a way to uncover new knowledge, and to report relationships among different aspects of studied phenomena. The Nature of Theory in Information Systems 在理論中不同的觀點 Prediction A prediction or forecast is a statement about the way things will happen in the future, often but not always based on experience or knowledge. Theories can aim at predictions, which allow the theory both to be tested and to be used to guide action. The Nature of Theory in Information Systems 理論的建構程序 A central question for this essay is how to construct a classificatory scheme for theories in Information Systems The method for classifying theory for IS proposed here begins with the primary goals of the theory. The Nature of Theory in Information Systems 理論的建構程序 歸納法理論建構流程 確定研究問題,界定範圍 建利概念性或理論的結構 將概念操作化,建立待驗證的假說 設計方法蒐集資料,檢定假說 分析檢驗做出結論 確定結論的適用範疇即可能限制 The Nature of Theory in Information Systems LOGO Classifying theory in IS 分辨歸納在資訊系統中的理論 分辨歸納在資訊系統中的理論 analysis & description explanation prediction prescription The four primary goals of theory discerned are The Nature of Theory in Information Systems 分辨歸納在資訊系統中的理論 Components of theories across the taxonomy www.themegallery.com 分辨歸納在資訊系統中的理論 Some components of theory are necessary for other components. Each theory must have some means of representation (include words, either spoken or written, mathematical symbols, operators from symbolic logic, diagrams, graphs, and other pictorial devices.) The Nature of Theory in Information Systems 分辨歸納在資訊系統中的理論 A single concept can have more than one physical representation: for example, the mathematical symbol “=” represents the same concept as the words “is equal to.” Each theory must also have constructs, which refer to the entities (physical phenomena or abstract theoretical terms) that the theory concerns. All the other components of theory depend on these basic components. The Nature of Theory in Information Systems LOGO Five type of theory in IS 在資訊系統中的五種理論類型 Theory for explaining B Theory for analyzing A C Theory for predicting 資訊系統理論 的五種型態 Theory for desing and action E The Nature of Theory in Information Systems D Theory for explaining and predicting 在資訊系統中的五種理論類型 There is some variation within each theory type, with different types of work depending on the focus of work undertaken and the scope of the theory. The classification is dependent on the main or primary goals of the theory, rather than goals that are present only to a minor degree. The Nature of Theory in Information Systems 在資訊系統中的五種理論類型 Type I: Theory for Analyzing Analyze & state “what is”. The most basic type of theory. They describe or classify specific dimensions or characteristics of individuals, groups, situations, or events by summarizing the commonalities found in discrete observations. The Nature of Theory in Information Systems 在資訊系統中的五種理論類型 Type I: Theory for Analyzing Theory that describes and analyses is valuable, as stated above, when little is known about some phenomena. Any evidence gathered would be expected to have credibility. The Nature of Theory in Information Systems 在資訊系統中的五種理論類型 Type I: Theory for Analyzing The Nature of Theory in Information Systems 在資訊系統中的五種理論類型 Type II: Theory for Explaining This type of theory explains primarily how and why some phenomena occur. Explanations of how, when, where, and why events occurred may be presented, giving rise to process-type theory. The Nature of Theory in Information Systems 在資訊系統中的五種理論類型 Type III: Theory for Predicting These theories are able to predict outcomes from a set of explanatory factors, without explaining the underlying causal connections between the dependent and independent variables in any detail. The focus of the theoretical model could be on prediction Reasons to justify the ascription of causality in regularity relationships might not yet have been uncovered. The Nature of Theory in Information Systems 在資訊系統中的五種理論類型 Type III: Theory for Predicting The Nature of Theory in Information Systems 在資訊系統中的五種理論類型 Type III: Theory for Predicting Associated research approaches include statistical techniques such as correlation or regression analysis and data mining. The existence of regularities or correlations between two variables does not necessarily imply a causal relationship. The Nature of Theory in Information Systems 在資訊系統中的五種理論類型 Type IV: Theory for Explaining and Predicting (EP Theory) This type of theory says what is, how, why, when, and what will be. EP theory implies both understanding of underlying causes and prediction, as well as description of theoretical constructs and the relationships among them. Many research methods can be used to investigate aspects of the EP theory type. The Nature of Theory in Information Systems 在資訊系統中的五種理論類型 Type IV: Theory for Explaining and Predicting (EP Theory) 在資訊系統中的五種理論類型 Type V: Theory for Design and Action This type of theory says how to do something. It is about the principles of form and function, methods, and justificatory theoretical knowledge that are used in the development of IS (Gregor 2002a; Gregor and Jones 2004; Walls et al. 1992). The Nature of Theory in Information Systems 在資訊系統中的五種理論類型 Type V: Theory for Design and Action 在資訊系統中的五種理論類型 Interrelationships among Theory Types The Nature of Theory in Information Systems LOGO Concluding remarks 結論 完成研究的程序 Combinations of four goals lead to the five types of theory The Nature of Theory in Information Systems LOGO 補充資料 補充資料 Classification of articles in MIS Quarterly and Information Systems Research (March 2003 – June 2004) 在MIS季刊和資訊系統研究中,文章的分類 Theory Type Frequency of Occurrence 1.Analysis 3 2.Explanation 4 3.Prediction 1 4.Explanation and prediction (EP) 33 5.Design and action 9 Total 50 The Nature of Theory in Information Systems 補充資料 Classification of articles in MIS Quarterly and Information Systems Research Analysis 18% 6% 8% 2% explanation prediction 66% explanation&predicti on design&action The Nature of Theory in Information Systems 在資訊系統中的五種理論類型 Application of the Taxonomy The taxonomy was used to classify 50 research articles in two leading journals to demonstrate its applicability Issues of MIS Quarterly and Information Systems Research from March 2003 to June 2004 were used as the source of the articles. All articles except issues and opinions, review articles, and research essays were included in the classification process. The Nature of Theory in Information Systems 在資訊系統中的五種理論類型 Classification was performed by the author and a junior researcher independently, using the distinguishing attributes in Table 2 as the primary basis for decisions to assign an article to one of Types I to V. The purpose of this classification activity was not to determine the relative frequency of publication of different theory types, but to test on a small scale whether the classification schema is (1) exhaustive, (2) understandable, and (3) does not have unnecessary categories. The Nature of Theory in Information Systems 在資訊系統中的五種理論類型 The activity showed that the schema appears to be exhaustive: no papers were found that could not be classified under the schema The decision rules to allocate theory to a category appear to be understandable, as the junior researcher was able to apply them independently and arrive at similar conclusions to the author. The Nature of Theory in Information Systems 在資訊系統中的五種理論類型 The question arises as to whether the Type III category is really necessary. Only one article was found with theory that fell into category III: prediction without causal explanation. It is believed that this category should be retained, even if instances in this class are few, both for analytic completeness and as it is a type of theory recognized by a number of authors. The Nature of Theory in Information Systems LOGO Click to edit company slogan .